Chapter 2: Why do we have to use money? (5 of 6)

[cywongdigi1984]

that is the problem of society nowadays when the knowledge and talent doesn't means anything. career suppose to be a tools to earn money but it is not about pursuing self interest. it end up the society that is materialistic and soulless about life. the advancement of technology suppose to let human work lesser but human nowadays is getting more stressful, competitive than before. how far we can predict our own future? no one wish to work and work for the rest of life for survival.

[cmoleon]

(before the end of the soviet empire, i had the opportunity to see highly sophisticated, disciplined, efficient 'scientists' who 'earned' less than a truck driver in their country; even today, e.g. comparable medical staff in such places on average 'earn' much less than in

'western' countries, and enjoy less of a social standing).

[stevebritgimp]

One interesting thing I've come across in my internet travels is Dancing Rabbit. It's something out of Monty Python, like an anarcho-syndicalist commune. They are an experimental community in Missouri. They use a currency, which is related to hours of work. So all labour is measured in hours of work. Hours then have a paper token which is used for exchange, and also is stored in a bank, and has an external exchange in US dollars.

[ToddAllenGates]

This doesn't seem all that different from just using money ... although I suppose if the people in the commune feel very alienated from money, this may seem like an improvement.

Also, this seems to rest on the premise that all hours of labor are equal. But are hours of brain surgery labor = to hours of babysitting? Maybe this type of thing works in a commune, but it would probably wreak havoc in a large society: it would be a disincentive to learn complex skills.

[cmoleon]

although i basically agree with your argument, it seems a little too simplistic - if you consider that people often do whatever it is they choose to do because that is what they prefer to do, even regardless of incentives: though it obviously overall does not work and is tyrannical and injust, remarkably even socialism seems not to prevent complexity and specialization;

[ToddAllenGates]

> although i basically agree with your argument, it seems a little too simplistic - if you consider that people often do whatever it is they choose to do because that is what they prefer to do, even regardless of incentives

True, I'm speaking in large general terms. I know it doesn't hold true for many individuals--including myself! I spend many hours on my writing & music, and even if I were absolutely *certain* it would never pay off financially, that wouldn't change my behavior at all.