Added: 2 years ago
From: NanoThermite911
Views: 3,607
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We were duped by the mainstream media... google,

    "september clues"

  • The persons who planned all this and you know who you are??....YOU KNEW how easy and capable this was to pull off and knew America was so controlled by your MEDIA and by idiousy probably by seeing all the goof balls in every facet of this countrySTATE and FEDERAL...however you did not count on how powerful THE INTERNET would become; did you??

  • Excellent,very concise and packed full of info,links etc. Good job.

  • oops missle not middle. Damn iPhone auto correct.

  • Halfgerman,

    Yes what I said definitely adds weight to your propsal. It is possible that the plane distance was used to distract people from the middle. Or given the planes crashing into the wtc they could have also assumed the flying object was another plane. Obviously it wasnt a plane.

  • during the interview between 6:00 -7:30 especially at 6:29. the orders could have been to strike the pentagon with a missile no?

  • halfGerman,

    Very unlikely. If you look in the description there are the NORAD orders by cheney, that prevent standard protocol for shooting down hijacked planes - unless authorized by Cheney or Rumsfeld. First time anyone ever setup extra step to follow standard FAA procedure.

    The context is that the guy talking to cheney saying "50 miles away, 30, 10 - do the orders still stand". Is asking if they can have the authorization to shoot down the incoming object. Declaring it's distance.

  • yes, thats what the video implies. congrats. u can figure out that 2+2 isnt 2.

    im saying that it could have all been staged, bullshitting the distance, completely making up a "shadow plane" if you will. its most possible that the projectile that hit the pentagon is a disarmed cruz missle. it has to come from 50+ miles away and its the shape/size of the hole. no expolsive damage ever reported. could have been laid pyrotechnics if u wanna go that far. that is still more likely than a jet

  • Furthermore,

    The Pentagon is the most secure building in the world. It has over 60 anti aircraft missle devices around it that will automatically shoot down any Non US military aircraft heading towards it. All citizen travel is based on commercial planes with commercial transponders.

    In the movie Zero: investigation in 911 by a Nobel prize winner - Top air force personnel discuss the stand down orders , and first time anyone put a block of shoot downs. Also how the plane would be shot down.

  • this.... this is a useless heap of words.

    you yourself disprove that it could ahve been an american commercial flight, it would have been auto shot down.

    going from there it proves that the missile system you speak of (which i havent checked up on) had to have been manually messed with for anything to hit the pentagon. missile or non military plane. (missiles are military aircraft bee tee dubs). all u have is given my arguement more weight.

  • You owe it to your country to look into both sides of the 9/11 debate. There are many well researched videos, aside from the ones that turn people off and are poorly done like Loose change. Good places to start

    !! Zero: Investigation into 911 (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

    WTC7 Freefall - No Longer Controversial. Scientifically Proven and self verifiable. @

    watch?v=gC44L0-2zL8

    Architects and Engineers for 911 truth @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI

  • great film...it summarizes a lot of info out there very quickly.

    Probably overwhelming for those whom are uninformed on the basics of 9/11 conspiracy however the links help.

    Keep up the great and important work, NT911

  • there were nt any planes at all! All were fabrications by preplanned media pics angles no one on the gtround actually saw airplanes fly in it!

  • No Planes = Disinformation

    How can you refute all my evidence that shows that AWACS was used on 9/11?

  • @sutadi1970 I thought no plane theory is ridiculus untill i saw Russian blue beam just type in "namiastka blue beam" in youtube , the norway spiral could have been amde by blue beam as well . The no plane theory sudentlly ebcome more real but i still think moust of the people that represent thsi theory are goverment fakes

  • OH! Of course... because you cannot build one, it must have been the Muslim fanatics.

  • MQ-9 Reaper

  • buahahha  hwohooo go back to your small box of secruity and ignorance, you can't handle the truth

  • and ladies and gentelmen this is the average american , this is the way average american thinks , brainwashed...

  • @whatever2dont

    They DO have remote control for large airplanes...

    Please look up in google, "Operation Dirty Trick"

    This states as far back as the 70's we've been capable of remotely controlling large commercial aircraft.

  • Awesome vid, 5 stars!

    Thank you NT11.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more