Added: 3 years ago
From: MesoamericaInAztlan
Views: 4,556
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • alemeda florence thats where the barrios at. Viva huntington park

  • STFU monkey slave....snap out of your monkey world fantasy! LOL

  • I've read that the colosal olmec head we're Olmec ball player superstars! I know this sounds funny but its kind of interesting.

  • Stop this Bullsh*t. Talking about the statute being a "native Indian". I saw original pictures of this statute and it had "cornroll braids". Nobody other group can wear cornroll braided hair - except Africans. This statute was a Moor and his helmet is the same helmet that can be seen on Nubia kings! Now I understand why the world hates us. This world is showing who the real kings are...

  • @fnkdrmmr your a retard there may have been an Australoid presence in prehistoric america and that is what accounts for the negroid like features and modern south american natives! but that said Melanesian and negrito peoples have been isolated for some time from there African cousins and are culturally and genetically distinct they also mixed heavenly with mongoloid peoples! no way does an early Australoid presence support a west African sea voyage that was responsible for olmec culture

  • @SUPERDYKEful Sorry. You're the retard... As stated, this Olmec head has the same features as the Nuba people, with the same "royal helmet" that is found in the pyramids in Sudan (Nubia). And yes, the Olmec has the same style of braids found in the Sudan. Yes, Australoid types do exist, but Africans populated the Earth - prior to Whites and other Asian type evolving. You people like re-naming people & things to keep everybody confused.

  • @fnkdrmmr lol i am so sending you A PM your dumb ass needs some reeducation!!

  • @fnkdrmmr tellem funky drummer. school these goofballs

  • @fnkdrmmr The early Inca of Peru wore cornroll braids. You clearly know nothing about Mesoamerican culture and are advised to butt out of this discussion. The Olmecs were neither "white", "black", nor "Australoid". Your arguments come off not only as an attempt to self-medicate a mental illness, but as racism. You cannot compensate for a stolen history by stealing the history of others. To perpetuate the theft of Native American culture begun by racist Europeans is the act of an "Uncle Tom".

  • @MooPotPie I'm not disrespecting "MesoAmerican" culture. I find it hard 2 believe that an "Indian-type" w/straight hair was corn-rolling his hair. Braiding is NOT

    the same as corn-roll. A person needs 2 have dry, wooly hair in order 2 wear

    corn-rolls. I am not attempting 2 steal anybody's culture, I'm simply stating facts.

    The headdress on the Olmec statute is the same exact headdress worn by the ancient

    Nubian Kings. This Western education has lied to us. & no, I'm not self-medicating.

  • @fnkdrmmr Fair enough, then the Inca braided their hair. We know this from their mummies…but the Olmec headdress may still be seen worn by isolated tribes in the Amazon today. The features of the heads, which indeed bear resemblance to "negroid" features when viewed from the front, appear decidedly "Polynesian" from the side and are IDENTICAL to those of Indians still living in the region who have no trace of African hair texture, a dominant genetic trait. I agree w/ you about Western (cont'd)

  • @fnkdrmmr (cont'd) "education", but my sources are Mesoamerican, not biased Eurocentric B.S.. No one disputes 1400 years of distortion and eradication of West African history. But there remains no archaeological, much less DNA, evidence of Africans in the New World prior to the 16th century and science must remain objective. Until verified DNA results on Olmec remains are published this is a moot debate. Should the DNA prove African migration, so be it. I'm skeptical, but truth will set us free.

  • @fnkdrmmr Sounds like you've been highly influenced by the works of Paul Barton, but personally, I have to dismiss both Euro- and Afro-centric theorists on grounds of questionable neutrality. We tend to talk ABOUT Mesoamericans rather than talking TO them. The good news is that DNA does not lie. New Olmec remains have been found recently at La Venta and DNA testing is rumored to be forthcoming. I will say this: the elongated male skulls are very strange and non-typican Asian indeed. Hmmm ...

  • silly monkey slaves WISH they were natives.....why? arent you proud of your west african heritage?

  • @mrtundra45 Monkey slaves? You people r so stupid. The Conquistadors ravished you "Native Indians" - & today, you all speak Spanish and claim Cortez as your lineage. Read a book, & not get drunk & high. The Spanish used your people as human taxi cabs as they made your people carried them on their backs from 1 part of central America to the other. Lastly, you've been lied too in school. Columbus was brought over here by Moors, he thought he was in India - hence your silly title native Indians.

  • @fnkdrmmr your brothers and sisters back in Africa sold you to the whites hence why you are on ytube living in your monkey fantasy and not starving.

  • @SUPERDYKEful Most "Blacks" in America did not come here via the "West African" slave trade. Stupid, we where here before you Caucasians came over as raiding homo-pirates. Sorry, I'm not wasting my time conversing with you. It's clear you people like to attach yourselves to things that you have no idea of what it means spiritually and physically, i.e, ancient Egypt. Don't worry, the Sun (Ra) will burn you people to a crisp or will kindly give skin cancer. Good Luck.

  • @fnkdrmmr what a clown Olmec civilization was Native American!

    its clear you don't understand stealing other peoples history's is wrong!!

    i bet you don't know a dam thing about the nok or Zulus your to busy thinking non African civilizations were black even if they were what have you as an individual done to go down in history?

  • @SUPERDYKEful Why in the world are you naming the "nok" or "Zulus" as my history? Africa is a vast & large continent. You are brainwashed by Hollywood. Africa has over a 1000 subcultures. I was born in Sudan (ancient Nubia and part of ancient Egypt). As mentioned, you are either part of those raiding homo-pirates that conquered your land or sadly one of those conquered. As mentioned, the Olmec head has corn-rolled braided hair - now, you say, the Indians or Hispanic have nappy hair - lol.

  • Those Heads Look Like Blacks From Africa Not Mexico....WOW

  • I think Black people should know when they see a reflection of themselves carved in stone since we perfected stone carving in Kush and Egypt. We know what are people look like and these stone heads don't look nothing like a Mayan, Aztec, Mexican or a Spaniard. I have seen these same faces and heads on the streets of Detroit, Chicago, Mississippi, Alabama and Africa. These stone heads look like the Nuba wrestlers in Africa or the people of Gambia, Ghana, Nigeria, etc. "They Came Before Columbus".

  • Its true that the rumor of it being african was started by archeologists nd white ppl.They even said it was asian.

  • Much respect to the African Dogon tribe and the Sudanese for traveling to the Americas and making these colossal heads.

  • @coreyaustin1 you got the wrong continent fool, Olmecs were Native American from Mexico...not africa.

  • @zinakan It's obvious you have been brainwashed by European philosophy. Native Americans are Asian and African mixed. It's simple water colors, if you mix yellow and brown, you get a reddish color. Why do you think Columbus call them the "red" people?

  • @coreyaustin1 how come native americans dont have afros than

  • @1980vince For the same reason Puertoricans don't. Or Brazillians. Afros aren't always inherited when blacks mix with another race.

  • @coreyaustin1 proves native americans aint african get over it . for the last time your getting us angry with your lies.

  • @1980vince Us who? I didn't say the Native AMericans were AFRICAN, I said they have African roots that date back 1 generation. Can't argue the facts can you? What Jose Maria y Serrano stated proves me right.

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Well that would debunk the dominant gene by blacks wouldn't it. The problem with Africans in America first, is there is no physical evidence. The stone heads look Amerindian not Ethiopian, Nubian or any African.

  • @blokcom It's funny that YOU say the stone heads don't look Ethiopian, yet the man who discovered them with his OWN EYES said they look African. Now you tell me, who should I believe? You're not that smart of a character are you......?

  • @coreyaustin1 ; It's the, "oh, if a white man said it it must be true" ...when it plays into your fantasies. Seems like your not the smart one.

  • @coreyaustin1 U talking abt 1862 thats outdated research.Theres new research nd advancements on this issue.Also if they were african or mixed with african wheres the wheat in mexico before 1492 or the corn in africa before 1492.It never exsited.Another is the bering straight theory also started by whiteppl.If we came from asia wheres the rice before1492?These historians say we came from asia,but u dnt see the asian ppl claiming r culture or saying they brought us culture.

  • @chikawak Everything you are writing still can't explain why there are huge heads with African features in a place where the people's features don't look the same as the head. Do you see any other culture with statues of other races erected on their land? That would make no sense right? It's obvious Asians didn't bring rice with them. Rice can't grow in cold climates. To make it to America you would have to go through extreme cold 1st to get here unless they came by boat which they didn't

  • @chikawak Show me this new research that goes against Jose Maria y Serrano claims, and I'll show you a web of lies that follows......

  • Comment removed

  • @coreyaustin1 ; This comment of yours is laughable. You Afrocentrics talk about 'brainwashed' and bringing big truths, when your following a Eurocentric version of the Amerindians as being "black." Don't you see the contradiction there? Simply, you have no physical evidence Africa was in Mexico "inventing civilizations." "Brainwashed." Riiiiight.

  • @zinakan also, Archeologist Jose Maria y Serrano discovered the first Olmec head in 1862 at Tres Zapotes. He published a short passage in the bulletin of the Mexican Geographical Statistical Society. And he said, “As a work of art it is without an exaggeration, a magnificent sculpture. But what amazed me was that the type that it represents is Ethiopian (African). This is documented. Marinate on that!

  • @coreyaustin1 Looks african is not proof.It doesnt mean ppl looked like that.How abt the heads thatlook really fat like a overweight person.There must of been alot of overweight ppl back then lol.

  • @coreyaustin1 that was very nice of them to swim here carve these heads then swim back. It's especially nice of them since they didn't even carve any for themselves in Sudan. Thanks again Dogon tribe.

  • @RazorRedPresa ; Excellent point. Instead, Corey would rather have feel good false history to try to "uplift" himself, but forgetting that these claims were brought on by whites first, which is ironic.

  • @blokcom No need to claim my history is false. Many theologists as well as archeologist and historians agree with my claims. It's funny how you claim I'm Afrocentric and I'm not. It's obvious you are Eurocentric though. The Olmec civilization died off, or were taken out by the Europeans, they are known for doing that around the world right? The Spanish Portugese and French invaded south and central america 1st right?

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Most don't agree with your claims. Yeah man, your an afrocentric. The Olmec died off? Or "taken out by the Europeans?" LMAO.. Seems like you don't know jack about the Olmec, smart guy. lol.

  • @blokcom Those who disagree with me are Eurocentric racists. You and them obviously have a lot in common. I know more about this than you EVER will imagine.

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Your just full of predictable quotes. You don't even realize it. The fact is, you don't know jack about "this." This is a fact jack. Actually brainiac, you afrocentrics are the ones who have a lot in common with Eurocentrics. Now deal with it.

  • Comment removed

  • @coreyaustin1 Why dont u tell the california natives that africans lived there before nd see what they tell you.They will laugh at ur ass.I gues you would rather believe some ignorant, pirate,smelly,crazy ,lusting for gold european.

  • @chikawak Of course Californians of now would laugh. They have been brainwased as well. Look it up. the oldest human fossil on American soil was found in California, AND it was said the skull was negro as well. You say it's important that ppl know their history, I know my history. If you aren't an Olmec how can you claim it? It's obvious these heads aren't Native American or Mexican. No one EVER claimed native americans had help from the aliens. Whites called all of you savages.

  • @coreyaustin1 ; The Olmec heads are Native. They look Native not Africa. That's your delusion. Blackwash. Deal with it. 

  • @coreyaustin1 Also in eygpt there r many,many statues nd faces that dont have broad features what soever.Does that mean they r mixed with another race.If not why is it ok for african ppl to have variations in the way they look,but when it comes to the native ppl we cant.HAVE SOME RESPECT!! This will be my last response to you.

  • @chikawak Olmecs were never african! It makes perfect sense if a ppl r gng to travel in ship or boat for long distances that they would bring food or crops from their homeland.There was no african crops here in the americas before the arrival of euros.There was no domesticated animals either before europeans came.africa had domesticated animals like goats,cattle nd even horses which egytions had.

  • @chikawak So I guess the native Americans chose to make statues of black men and not themselves right? Explain that one ole wise one.....

  • @coreyaustin1 Who said they were african.none of them have paint on them.My computer was down for a couple of weeks.Ok u hebrew,islamic,jew,moor,israli­te,washitaw,whatever u are.

  • @coreyaustin1 Yes there r ppl that r native nd african, that happened after 1492, nd that avery small minority.Broad features nd braids r also worn by natives to this day.U want more facts go to youtube.com/user/salsassin channel.this guy can break it down way better than i can.

  • @chikawak That whole 1492 shit was bullshit. You really think Cristobal Colon was the 1st European to be on American soil? Salsassin and I have had many debates over it and he couldn't stump me either. He deleted all my comments because he couldn't answer any of my questions and he didn't want to appear defeated on his own posts. He's actually funny to me. Cristobal Colon's (Columbus) 2nd navigator to the America's (after he made a mistake thinking it was India) was Nigerian.

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Afrocentricism is bullshit and is already being exposed for what it is. Your nothing but lies.

  • @chikawak Portugal was actually the 1st Europeans to reach the Americas, they started the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade in South America 1st. And when they went further north into California they have in their journals that they saw Africans who had obviously had Nubian/Egyptian civilization similarities. This is documented. Salsassin speaks half truths and adds his own philosophy of Eurocentricism to it.

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Lies. If there was contact doesn't mean the built up the Americas you afro centric dingity dongs try to say. Salsassin has debunked those claims. But even with out the science you have no evidence. Only outlandish claims by idiot Van Sertima and dumbass Winters.

  • @coreyaustin1 I dont really care what foreingors came to r lands first.My point is we built r civilaztions out of r own genius.We did not need help from africans,aliens,moors etc.The portuguese associated r societies with african cus they did nothave nothing else to compare to.Also back then those europeans were very ignornant abt r societies.All the lies ,killings,etc not very good sources.

  • @chikawak ; the dude talks about Eurocentricism but fails to recognize the striking similarities to Afrocentricity. Both garbage ideologies. Despite the evidence Salsassin shows that this guy corey is blackwashed, like how people are whitewashed. Two different coats of paint but the same effect.

  • @blokcom Thats why its important that r ppl know there true history,or else they will fall for these lies.

  • @blokcom There is so such thing as blackwashed. Blacks are going back claiming history and whites can't take it because their ancient lies are being exposed so they try to say our info is false. It's the ole bait and pull trick. Salsassin was defeated in a debate by me, ask him yourself if he's man enough to admit it. It's funny, I have never heard of Van Sertima or Winters. I have more reliable sources

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Afrocentricism = Blackwashing. With this comment, you are proving your self a fraud and a liar and dumb.

  • @coreyaustin1 U afrocentrics r confused first u say they r nubian then ethiopian then eygtion.U guys r really confused u call urselves hebrews,moors ,islamic,jews nd the list goes on.

  • @chikawak of course Egypt has different statues with different features. It was conquered how many times? LOL, Nubia, Arab, Mesopotamia, Greece etc conquered. It would only make sense right? I would stop responding too if I were you, you're digging a bigger hole for yourself.

  • @coreyaustin1 Theres was no wheat or watermelons here before the euoros came.When the euros came they brought euro,african crops nd even domesticated animals.Why wouldnt africans bring watermelons nd wheat nd farm animals here. Why cus olmecs were not african.Soon these afrocentrics r gng to say that the eygtions were eating tacos,pozole,tamales which r native foods.

  • @chikawak It took you a week to respond with that garbage of an explanation.....?...I pity you and your half truths my friend. The world will know soon enough

  • @coreyaustin1 Yep just as i figured u cant answer simple common sense questions.U reply by trying to insult me,u have nothing concrete to say.Im pretty sure u have seen the salsassin videos that show many native ppl with broad features.

  • @coreyaustin1 U also call urselves isralites.So i guess every native is wrong nd u r right.None of r elders ,wise ppl or creation stories say that africans came or taught us how to build societies.

  • @coreyaustin1 Ur claims will never become reality.Nd not cus of white ppl, but cus we the native ppl will not put up with that.U have no real proof,just quotes other ppl said.Nd plz stop gng to mexico nd telling ppl there that the olmecs r african.Nd the olmecs r native nd they r my ancestors,cus im native to this land nd u r not.Ur home is across the ocean.

  • @coreyaustin1 And who are your reliable sources? Who ever they are, from your comments you seem seriously misinformed and ignorant. There is no evidence or any logical reason to believe the Olmecs were from africa. So stick to making your wack ass beats and leave Native culture to Natives. nice try though..... Peace out brotha

  • Evidence supports the African origin & perpetuation of an Olmec civilization in Mesoamerica from 1200 BC. The ones I will point out are the "African" scripts found during archaeological excavation, the presence of "African skeletal" & materials excavated from Olmec graves. The writing system used by Olmec, which was later adopted by the Mayans, was first used by the Mande speaking people in "North Africa" It is called Libyco-Berber.

  • @ScarBro2006 you are dilusional....no such things have ever been found.....Believe what you want, but let me just say you are IGNORANT. I shouldnt even reply to this bullshit....

  • @zinakan - Prove to me that these things have not been found. Tell me what things have not been found, & I will tell you where to go observe it, with your own two eyes. I suggest you stop being ignorant and go see for yourself. You are disputing facts and evidence. I suggest you start your journey at anthropological museum (Museo de Antropología) in Veracruz Mexico to open your eyes, and you will come to see who is delusional.

    "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

  • @ScarBro2006 lol prove to me those thing have been found! There is no evidence of any of that nonsense.,,I have been to la venta and san lorenzo and i have never seen anyone that looked african there..... My grandma is from veracruz!! ...Africa is way across the atlantic ocean, you should take a look at a map sometime. stop reading bullshit.....

  • Comment removed

  • @zinakan I can clearly see you're in way over your head, and you will only resort to opinion, feelings and nonsense. I presented you with facts which I know you "cannot" dispute. I shouldn't have to spoon feed you anymore, as this info is very easy to obtain and see in person. You do know the Olmecs were able to walk from Africa to the Americas, as the continents were interconnected at the time? You're in way over your head, and I am wasting my time. Good day.

  • @ScarBro2006 you said the Olmecs were around at 1200 b.c......and now you said the continents were connected at that time??? wow now i know your a real idiot.....your the stupidest of these nuts on here......get lost you ignorant racist fuck.....Leave Native american history and culture alone..

  • Comment removed

  • @zinakan You're only making yourself look the fool! I said "Evidence supports the African origin & perpetuation of an Olmec civilization in Mesoamerica from 1200 BC". I am talking of two things! The origin which I refer to the (skulls) & the influence "from" 1200 BC in Mesoamerica (script/materials). I did not say the Olmecs started at 1200 BC. You're very stupid, & I am not a racist. Clearly, you can only resort to opinion, feelings & nonsense. You're not smart enough for any conversation.

  • @zinakan HAHAHAH your the one that said people walked over cause the continents were joined...There is no evidence to suport your stupidity....there is no scripts from Africa you idiot....keep believing it though, im sure it makes you fell good. Olmecs were Native and their descendants still live in the same region.....I resort to logic, you resort to ignorance. Use your brain for once in your life YOU RACIST DONKEY, LEAVE NATIVES ALONE! AFRICANS HAVE THEIR OWN CONTINENT!!

  • @coreyaustin1 ; Okay, how bout this. White people were the first people in Africa. They migrated down into Africa and over time their hair became curly and their skin darkened. They are the San people, who are descended from Neanderthals. Later on, they moved up into Egypt and became reddish in color. We could just "invent" history as we go along.

  • They were a race of Polynesian Giants!!! 

  • There Natives not black africans

  • Hey this is on Alameda and florence blvd

  • Black people have never like Starbucks.

  • wow he fogot to say that they were black..... wow

    he failed

  • there not black ....lol...

  • I went to Veracruz and explored the state. The colosal heads at the museum in Xalapa were magnifico. They are very huge. If one rolled over, you are done for. :).... anyway

  • thats awesome, i made one for a project last year.

  • Bro, Thanks for the comment. It's all work in progress but we'll get there. Give me a call or send me you contact info.

  • ... there's a little of m. night shyamalan in you Tocatzin ;).

    Fantastic installment my friend! Keep them coming.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more