Some wrote that you should sue the Police. Unfortunately, this isn't going to happen as the Defence Attorney will file a Motion to Dismiss on grounds of failure to state a case (in other words you fail to have "standing" in court because you can neither prove loss, harm or injury- which is true). You may notice that this is difficult for you though, but can be proven to work if you push the issue or at least gives you very good grounds for appeal..
For instance, he threatened to arrest you for filming. No loss, harm or injury cam e to him and therefore he does not have the necessary "standing" (civil) or "Corpus Delicti" (criminal) to put forth a case and leaves the court without jurisdiction (not the court cares since they're corrupt to the core).
For more information see- MarcStevens3 channel and MarcStevens(.)net
Worth purchasing "Adventures in Legalland" too.
Furthermore, Marc will be holding seminars at the up coming PorcFest
In CANADA there are no laws against filming in public...
its an extension of the unalienable right to freespeech and freedom of the media.
Know your rights : and educate those who dont know.
The Police Officers in CANADA should know this this basic constitutional law
I would think its asimilar in the USA ?
Note:
The Police have a duty to investigate distress calls ; Sometimes this is used as a lawfull excuse for ilegal entry and searches. lawfull intention also saves lives !
Good for you. Cops should know the law well enough to know they may ask to not be videotaped, but may not compell compliance absent statutory authority.
I oppose drug prohibition, but do not blame the cop enforcing the law. Likewise, I expect the cop who opposes my videotaping from public grounds of public activity to likewise tolerate me. It is inexcusable for an officer who claims "just doing my job" when making an unjust arrest to later enforce his whims outside the law when it suits him
And I hope one day some cop knocks your teeth down your throat for looking at him funny (he thinks), says you took a swing at him, and sends you to live with big bubba.
@BackdoorBandit956- No need to hope. If you read "Call 911 and Die" it will show you that the Police have proven track record of not turning up when they're needed, and attacking, also sometimes killing, the person that asked for help.
You who want to record people voice are hypocrites. You passed a law that make it illegally to record some ones voice unless they agree. That was you did not want cops, fbi, husbands, wives catching you doing some thing wrong and using it court. The state made it a felony. I do think it is a crappy law. Just wait you will get another one just a crappy in time.
Posting a video of public officials abusing their power is making Keene despise Ridley? You are kidding right? Unless you mean it is making those that abuse their power in Keene hate Ridley. That would make sense.
no, they're going around burning bridges and acting like complete jerks and looking for trouble. There are ways to change things. Police are people, and they're intentionally trying to goad police into a reactions. I'm not saying their actions are correct, but christ people pick your battles and stop acting like holy crusaders over couches? Death threats over couches?
dude, every video I've watched shows complete untruths. "note how he steps onto the property to make the arrest" uh, nope, must have missed THAT point too. All your vids make you and your cronies look like complete idiots. Don't you see that yet? Do you have a day job as a productive member of the American workforce?
Actually it's completely and totally legal to videotape a corporate debt collector, I mean cop. You should have gotten him to state the ACTUAL law and if he couldn't then just continue filming then when they release you and they will have to, you lawyer up and sue.
I believe that if public employees believe they have the POWER (not right) to video and audio record their encounters with the public, then the public should likewise have the unencumbered RIGHT to likewise record any events in public or on publicly-owned property (such as courtrooms, government buildings, and the like). That seems equitable and fair.
And who has all the CCTV cameras, dashcams, satellite cams, and traffic scammeras? Not us. What's good for the goose, is good for the gander!
From what I understand from your previous vids Dave, the NH statutes are unclear with respect to audio recording, but not video recording. Is that correct?
I believe you also mentioned that there is a bill being proposed in your state legislature that will clarify your right to record public employees in the exercise of their public duties. if I'm not mistaken, what is the bill identifier?
In other states they would charge you for wire tapping, resisting arrest, and probably assault on an officer for questioning their authority and asking them about the law. In NH, it seems they just kidnap you for a while... catch and release style.
I'm in Arizona. The cops around here are a mixed bag. The Sheriff is corrupt, but his deputies are for the most part pretty good guys. The city police are generally the type that harass and enforce, however there are some good guys on the force. It's not as bad as other places, but probably not as good as NH.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio! ahahaha. Pink underware and all of that? Yeah, he's just a little corrupt. I've heard some things about him. He said on Lou Dobbs, "I get sued everytime I flush the toilet!". I can't imagine why...
RP4409 is Arizona based. Check out there Youtube channel. They've been going after all of the scameras placed on your roadways there - and just got the issue on the Arizona ballot for the next election.
Well, I wasn't referring to Arpaio, but I'm sure he fits the description. He's a sitting sheriff who's traveling around pitching his dumb book. I agree with some of his methods, but others stink to high heaven.
I actually meant the Pima County Sheriff Dupnik, just south of Phoenix. During elections he's got a goon squad that runs around uprooting his opponents signs, defacing property, and threatening people. It's pretty bad. "Somehow" he always wins...
It's much more politically expedient to go after the brown-skinned foreign worker than the upstanding pillars-of-the-community white skinned business owner who illegally employs them.
Sheriff Arpaio is one of the most popular public figures in Arizona.
I suspect his popularity would diminish substantially if he went after illegal employers.
Too bad he's concerned with the popularity contest.
We need to find the actual laws and make up cards. So when the cop says stuff like that, we can SHOW HIM THE LAW. I think it would help both the videographer with added confidence and possibly prevent a cop from "accidentally" arresting you for breaking a law that doesnt exist.
after great thought, I've found that if it's good enough for police to tape me, then it's fine with me to tape them. After all, everyone knows if you don't have anything to hide you have nothing to worry about lol
You keep showing us the jersk in NH and I'm starting to think twice about moving there. Can we get a video of liberty loving public servants that understand they serve the public please? That would actually be a good video subject.
dude i am constantly airing videos of nice NH officers and politicians . they are totally the rule and not the exception. I aired one today. are you just not watching or what?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
After great thought - I think I have discovered why these men and women don't want to be videotaped. I *might* be wrong...but maybe...just maybe - they don't feel like having their pics posted on the internet so they can just be called fascist pigs by the ilks of your following. Ya think? Maybe? Hm?
maskedphrogg - since you wrote this literary diatribe to me - let me just say in response to your question...OMG! OMG! I don't know! OMG!
CuCkOo cUcKoO....are you getting the message yet that I think you just wasted a whole lot of time writing what you did? THIS....amuses me greatly. THANKS! I need one more red thumbs down and I win a free toaster.
i didn't even realize that the officer entered the property to take cooper away. what if cooper were an unmanned or remotely-operated surveilance camera? it's on the property. the cop enters to stop the terrible crime of filming his immoral actions. that would be a crime. hm.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Thank you for being the first to prove my point. You can hide behind your philosophy for liberty vids all you want - but at your deepest core - you are exactly what this world doesn't need....you are no better than what you claim others to be - and your hatred only stings those who truly do believe in freedom.
One may film from one's property.
CelestialEmbodiment 10 months ago
Some wrote that you should sue the Police. Unfortunately, this isn't going to happen as the Defence Attorney will file a Motion to Dismiss on grounds of failure to state a case (in other words you fail to have "standing" in court because you can neither prove loss, harm or injury- which is true). You may notice that this is difficult for you though, but can be proven to work if you push the issue or at least gives you very good grounds for appeal..
OldSmellyCrotch 1 year ago
For instance, he threatened to arrest you for filming. No loss, harm or injury cam e to him and therefore he does not have the necessary "standing" (civil) or "Corpus Delicti" (criminal) to put forth a case and leaves the court without jurisdiction (not the court cares since they're corrupt to the core).
For more information see- MarcStevens3 channel and MarcStevens(.)net
Worth purchasing "Adventures in Legalland" too.
Furthermore, Marc will be holding seminars at the up coming PorcFest
OldSmellyCrotch 1 year ago
In CANADA there are no laws against filming in public...
its an extension of the unalienable right to freespeech and freedom of the media.
Know your rights : and educate those who dont know.
The Police Officers in CANADA should know this this basic constitutional law
I would think its asimilar in the USA ?
Note:
The Police have a duty to investigate distress calls ; Sometimes this is used as a lawfull excuse for ilegal entry and searches. lawfull intention also saves lives !
canadastreetmedia 1 year ago
Good for you. Cops should know the law well enough to know they may ask to not be videotaped, but may not compell compliance absent statutory authority.
I oppose drug prohibition, but do not blame the cop enforcing the law. Likewise, I expect the cop who opposes my videotaping from public grounds of public activity to likewise tolerate me. It is inexcusable for an officer who claims "just doing my job" when making an unjust arrest to later enforce his whims outside the law when it suits him
jjjooommm222 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ridley is a cock sucker!!!! I hope this mother fucker needs the police to help him one day and they never show up!
BackdoorBandit956 2 years ago
And I hope one day some cop knocks your teeth down your throat for looking at him funny (he thinks), says you took a swing at him, and sends you to live with big bubba.
newdarnaccount 1 year ago
@BackdoorBandit956- No need to hope. If you read "Call 911 and Die" it will show you that the Police have proven track record of not turning up when they're needed, and attacking, also sometimes killing, the person that asked for help.
OldSmellyCrotch 1 year ago
A. You tell the Cop you are within your rights to film them in Public.
B. You tell the Cop to leave the Property if he crosses onto it.
C. You sue them if they violate either of those demands.
mi6QBranch 2 years ago 4
he can do what the hell he wont on his own land so he can tell them to go suck a C,ck
BRAINSTORM555 2 years ago
You who want to record people voice are hypocrites. You passed a law that make it illegally to record some ones voice unless they agree. That was you did not want cops, fbi, husbands, wives catching you doing some thing wrong and using it court. The state made it a felony. I do think it is a crappy law. Just wait you will get another one just a crappy in time.
samatention 2 years ago
hey. this isn't helping, it's hurting. You've made keene despise you.
kungfuwookie 2 years ago
Posting a video of public officials abusing their power is making Keene despise Ridley? You are kidding right? Unless you mean it is making those that abuse their power in Keene hate Ridley. That would make sense.
Maxwedge12000 2 years ago
no, they're going around burning bridges and acting like complete jerks and looking for trouble. There are ways to change things. Police are people, and they're intentionally trying to goad police into a reactions. I'm not saying their actions are correct, but christ people pick your battles and stop acting like holy crusaders over couches? Death threats over couches?
kungfuwookie 2 years ago
dude, every video I've watched shows complete untruths. "note how he steps onto the property to make the arrest" uh, nope, must have missed THAT point too. All your vids make you and your cronies look like complete idiots. Don't you see that yet? Do you have a day job as a productive member of the American workforce?
beebo02 2 years ago
If the video disturb you so, may I suggest stop watching them? This way you will be free to find something else to whine about. LOL
Maxwedge12000 2 years ago
You can suggest that all you want, however, you have your opinion, while I have mine.
beebo02 2 years ago
good
kmassabe 2 years ago
Actually it's completely and totally legal to videotape a corporate debt collector, I mean cop. You should have gotten him to state the ACTUAL law and if he couldn't then just continue filming then when they release you and they will have to, you lawyer up and sue.
exacerbatedtaboo 2 years ago 2
I believe that if public employees believe they have the POWER (not right) to video and audio record their encounters with the public, then the public should likewise have the unencumbered RIGHT to likewise record any events in public or on publicly-owned property (such as courtrooms, government buildings, and the like). That seems equitable and fair.
And who has all the CCTV cameras, dashcams, satellite cams, and traffic scammeras? Not us. What's good for the goose, is good for the gander!
P3rf3ctStorm 2 years ago
From what I understand from your previous vids Dave, the NH statutes are unclear with respect to audio recording, but not video recording. Is that correct?
I believe you also mentioned that there is a bill being proposed in your state legislature that will clarify your right to record public employees in the exercise of their public duties. if I'm not mistaken, what is the bill identifier?
P3rf3ctStorm 2 years ago
So your on private property and the officer is saying you cannot video tape?
cdimmm 2 years ago
In other states they would charge you for wire tapping, resisting arrest, and probably assault on an officer for questioning their authority and asking them about the law. In NH, it seems they just kidnap you for a while... catch and release style.
watcher8o 2 years ago
What state do you live in? You might consider re-locating to Keene!
P3rf3ctStorm 2 years ago
I'm in Arizona. The cops around here are a mixed bag. The Sheriff is corrupt, but his deputies are for the most part pretty good guys. The city police are generally the type that harass and enforce, however there are some good guys on the force. It's not as bad as other places, but probably not as good as NH.
watcher8o 2 years ago
Sheriff Joe Arpaio! ahahaha. Pink underware and all of that? Yeah, he's just a little corrupt. I've heard some things about him. He said on Lou Dobbs, "I get sued everytime I flush the toilet!". I can't imagine why...
RP4409 is Arizona based. Check out there Youtube channel. They've been going after all of the scameras placed on your roadways there - and just got the issue on the Arizona ballot for the next election.
P3rf3ctStorm 2 years ago
Well, I wasn't referring to Arpaio, but I'm sure he fits the description. He's a sitting sheriff who's traveling around pitching his dumb book. I agree with some of his methods, but others stink to high heaven.
I actually meant the Pima County Sheriff Dupnik, just south of Phoenix. During elections he's got a goon squad that runs around uprooting his opponents signs, defacing property, and threatening people. It's pretty bad. "Somehow" he always wins...
watcher8o 2 years ago
A few years ago Sheriff Arpaio was been deputized by the department of homeland "security" to make immigration arrests.
He does these huge dragnet sweeps in Hispanic neighborhoods to round up as many people as he can.
If law enforcement was serious about stopping illegal immigration they would crackdown on the businesses that are hiring these people.
Take away the jobs and the immigrants will have no incentive to be here.
fczwartek 2 years ago
Sounds like an excellent plan fczwartek. Too bad "they" aren't heeding such common sense advice. Must be the profit-motive eh?
P3rf3ctStorm 2 years ago
It's much more politically expedient to go after the brown-skinned foreign worker than the upstanding pillars-of-the-community white skinned business owner who illegally employs them.
Sheriff Arpaio is one of the most popular public figures in Arizona.
I suspect his popularity would diminish substantially if he went after illegal employers.
Too bad he's concerned with the popularity contest.
fczwartek 2 years ago
Cops...they have no problem with cameras in public. At least not the ones they point at us!
Same goes for guns.
hampsom 2 years ago
good collection of videos.
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
if i move there can i bring my guns
HandsHeldHigh1 2 years ago
of course. If you are flying its best to mail your guns to an address here though. :)
vampzim 2 years ago
I'm willing to bet that for every home there is at least one gun here in NH. That is probably a VERY conservative estimate. BRING 'em!
LumpyRevolution 2 years ago 2
they dont have the right to tell you to stop vidoe taping
HandsHeldHigh1 2 years ago
It's a simple act of the NH legislature to say, "No state employee may refuse to be recorded in the performance of their duty."
Privacy is for private people, in my opinion. Anyone who wants to be a bureaucrat can darned well be recorded while they get paid with tax money.
CurtHowland 2 years ago 2
They have the right to ask you, you have the right to refuse compliance.
mi6QBranch 2 years ago 2
We need to find the actual laws and make up cards. So when the cop says stuff like that, we can SHOW HIM THE LAW. I think it would help both the videographer with added confidence and possibly prevent a cop from "accidentally" arresting you for breaking a law that doesnt exist.
vampzim 2 years ago 3
after great thought, I've found that if it's good enough for police to tape me, then it's fine with me to tape them. After all, everyone knows if you don't have anything to hide you have nothing to worry about lol
TEBON 2 years ago 3
You keep showing us the jersk in NH and I'm starting to think twice about moving there. Can we get a video of liberty loving public servants that understand they serve the public please? That would actually be a good video subject.
stracinsrt4 2 years ago
We're working on it but we need you and you likley need us more. It's going to happen faster if you come! :)
Hope to see you soon!
LumpyRevolution 2 years ago
That raises a good question:
Are there any FSP police officers?
watcher8o 2 years ago
dude i am constantly airing videos of nice NH officers and politicians . they are totally the rule and not the exception. I aired one today. are you just not watching or what?
RidleyReport 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
After great thought - I think I have discovered why these men and women don't want to be videotaped. I *might* be wrong...but maybe...just maybe - they don't feel like having their pics posted on the internet so they can just be called fascist pigs by the ilks of your following. Ya think? Maybe? Hm?
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
so much for 'great thoughts'
TEBON 2 years ago
Oh goodie - I have sparked a neuron and have made you take the time to give me a coveted thumbs down. * like fishing in a barrel *
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
Too bad none of the commentary on this incident "sparked any neurons" in you.
This fella was video recording Public Space from Private Property. Public roads are public space
Let us review.
LEO has sworn oath to uphold Law.
Law is clear that there is No Expectation of Privacy while in Public Space
LEO violently stops lawful activity of recording from Private Space
LEO has sworn oath to uphold Law
Why isn't LEO arresting himself for acting in opposition of Law that is well established?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
maskedphrogg - since you wrote this literary diatribe to me - let me just say in response to your question...OMG! OMG! I don't know! OMG!
CuCkOo cUcKoO....are you getting the message yet that I think you just wasted a whole lot of time writing what you did? THIS....amuses me greatly. THANKS! I need one more red thumbs down and I win a free toaster.
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
Yes, thank you
Always brings pleasure flushing the trolls
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
TYRANNICAL FUCKS!!!
unodepoalli 2 years ago 4
uh. that's a wee bit extreme, don't you think?
i didn't even realize that the officer entered the property to take cooper away. what if cooper were an unmanned or remotely-operated surveilance camera? it's on the property. the cop enters to stop the terrible crime of filming his immoral actions. that would be a crime. hm.
intrepgun 2 years ago
Cooper was filming from his father's property... why don't people enter that into the equation?
LumpyRevolution 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thank you for being the first to prove my point. You can hide behind your philosophy for liberty vids all you want - but at your deepest core - you are exactly what this world doesn't need....you are no better than what you claim others to be - and your hatred only stings those who truly do believe in freedom.
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
It's so sad that you don't understand freedom or are not capable of granting it to yourself. Sad and pathetic... truly shameful.
LumpyRevolution 2 years ago