Man, the time goes by and I keep noticing one thing.....how creationists avoid these subjects, and when those that do stick their heads in here get called on their nonsense they don't come back or try to refute anything. Nothing like real, hard science to bitchslap mythology.
@Biblesmackministries the issue here is one of heat. The deposits covered are specifically evaporite deposits as evidenced by the presence of pollen and other contamination (such as plant and other animal material). The amount of heat for the evaporation of water is a known quanity from chemistry. Simply put, the amount of salt that exists simply outweighs the amount of time possible per the "noachian flood". Examine the data for the Opeche Shale and see what I mean.
@Biblesmackministries Sorry for the late response. Been sometime since I've been to this channel. Since no one responded, I'll hook you up. Actually, the type of salt is key, because it comes down to one thing: heat. The amount of salt found requires a specific amount of heat input to evaporate that much seawater. To introduce that much heat energy into the system in the space of the given timeframe (1 year for the Noachian Flood) would destroy ALL LIFE. Just some math, chemistry, and physics.
Excellent, excellent, excellent! I also love to note how pollen shows that grasses are relatively recent players on the scene as far as plants go. And that morton website! A GLODMINE!
pretty good video ; though as another commented as well, a little bit of sound would be very lovely - either some cheesey music or just yourself reading aloud (also would help catch the blind audience? ^^)
Thank you and you're right, this video was one of my first and I hardly had the skills to make a video like this. In the last videos I used a bit of music, but the next video (a short one for testing) will have my voice in it and will be wide-screen. :)
@Terrencje There's also a paper out from the Journal of Sedimentation that might help you explain your points a bit better: "Sedimentology of Ancient Saline Pans: An Example from the Permian Opeche Shale, Williston Basin, North Dakota, USA" by Benison and Goldstein. Got some good figures that might help visualize the issue.
One thing I've noticed is the great lack of creationist commentary on your videos. I think this is due to the fact that they come here, see all these references, hear your clear discussion and realize they've really got no chance. I'm going to have to start posting links to some of your work in Nephy's comments. Stir the pot a little more!
I tied debating these topics to me once but he just talked around it. I also send my videos as responses to many creationist but they are either ignoring, can't explain it in their model or just don't understand.
Another question: Why are bryozoan and coral reefs stratified in the fossil record?
InternetDarkLord 10 months ago
Man, the time goes by and I keep noticing one thing.....how creationists avoid these subjects, and when those that do stick their heads in here get called on their nonsense they don't come back or try to refute anything. Nothing like real, hard science to bitchslap mythology.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
While I am not gong to claim to be an expert, and it has been a while since I updated myself on creation science.
I think you are leaving out a few details.
a. Creation science holds to an ice age following the flood, how does that interact?
b. does your findings really fall in line with the evolutionary view of 6 ice ages?
The ocean is always depositing salt why is this such a contradiction especially in light of the earths shifting tectonic plates.
In Christ,
Matt
Biblesmackministries 1 year ago
@Biblesmackministries the issue here is one of heat. The deposits covered are specifically evaporite deposits as evidenced by the presence of pollen and other contamination (such as plant and other animal material). The amount of heat for the evaporation of water is a known quanity from chemistry. Simply put, the amount of salt that exists simply outweighs the amount of time possible per the "noachian flood". Examine the data for the Opeche Shale and see what I mean.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
@Biblesmackministries Sorry for the late response. Been sometime since I've been to this channel. Since no one responded, I'll hook you up. Actually, the type of salt is key, because it comes down to one thing: heat. The amount of salt found requires a specific amount of heat input to evaporate that much seawater. To introduce that much heat energy into the system in the space of the given timeframe (1 year for the Noachian Flood) would destroy ALL LIFE. Just some math, chemistry, and physics.
NorthForkFisherman 10 months ago
All of geology proves creationism wrong and the earth is millions of years old.
But rocks and fossils are invisible to YECs.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Excellent, excellent, excellent! I also love to note how pollen shows that grasses are relatively recent players on the scene as far as plants go. And that morton website! A GLODMINE!
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
@NorthForkFisherman Damn: Goldmine! Really need a spellcheck.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
pretty good video ; though as another commented as well, a little bit of sound would be very lovely - either some cheesey music or just yourself reading aloud (also would help catch the blind audience? ^^)
GronTheMighty 2 years ago
Thank you and you're right, this video was one of my first and I hardly had the skills to make a video like this. In the last videos I used a bit of music, but the next video (a short one for testing) will have my voice in it and will be wide-screen. :)
Terrencje 2 years ago
@Terrencje There's also a paper out from the Journal of Sedimentation that might help you explain your points a bit better: "Sedimentology of Ancient Saline Pans: An Example from the Permian Opeche Shale, Williston Basin, North Dakota, USA" by Benison and Goldstein. Got some good figures that might help visualize the issue.
NorthForkFisherman 10 months ago
One thing I've noticed is the great lack of creationist commentary on your videos. I think this is due to the fact that they come here, see all these references, hear your clear discussion and realize they've really got no chance. I'm going to have to start posting links to some of your work in Nephy's comments. Stir the pot a little more!
magick205 2 years ago
Haha maybe he will respond :)
I tied debating these topics to me once but he just talked around it. I also send my videos as responses to many creationist but they are either ignoring, can't explain it in their model or just don't understand.
Terrencje 2 years ago
add some sound man to youre vid good clean polished arg tho over all nice
hereticjoeyjoey 2 years ago
Damn but you deserve far more views! I am going to share this one out and hope that it gets the views it deserves. Well done and well researched.
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
Great video, unfortunately the points are beyond most creationists.
LithodidMan 3 years ago
At least some people will find it worth the watch :)
thanx for the nice comment.
Terrencje 3 years ago