Added: 1 year ago
From: conferencereport
Views: 440
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I fight in the gym doing Martial Arts. true consensual suffering. You go through phases where for a period of time you're almost overwhelmed with the (undeniable?) fact that you are a true idiot. I mean a genuine fool, without question. At times like these, you go to the gym and get in a fight, and you usually win. It's strange how motivation works, but discipline definately overlaps with joy when you don't stop the practice.

  • How far do you walk in a week. Doesn't your arm get sore holding that camera up?

  • cool

  • Consensual suffering is not a complex issue. The suffering that Gary is talking about weighing in his ethical equation, is the non consensual suffering that you impose on other sentient life.

  • @TheAnthrochocobo Thank you for your insightful comment. One does need to be reminded that there are those out there like you with a lot to say.

  • carrying on living could be considered 'consensual suffering' to some...(?)

  • @TWITfromURANUS Spot on!

  • Now "consensual violence" is an oxymoron. Guess you meant consensual suffering.

  • @esaman What about boxing matches?

  • @chitchcott Stepping in boxing ring means you are asking for it. The opponent is just fulfilling your wishes. The same thing as going to the dentist, or riding a bike down a hill off-roads. If you are too stupid to understand the risks then it is an accident by stupidity not suffering by violence.

  • @esaman Sure, you're asking for it, which is why it's consensual. Are you saying boxing matches are not violent?

  • @chitchcott I already answered that. No, they are not truly violent. They are violent in the same way a storm can be said to be violent. It is a rhetorical use of analogy to true violence. It should be quite obvious that the defining feature of something being an act of aggression/violence is it being against the wishes of the victim. So nothing consensual should be called violent at least for the purpose of discussion on ethics.

  • A video on dignity may be usefull at this point

  • What about the negative experience of being aware of one self in a bit of rock flying in space? Isn't that what REAL suffering is? No God, no belonguing that soothes, no discernible reason for things to be apart from alleatory aglomerations of matter. That is REAL suffering, not the simple foot ache that (nevertheless and annoyingly) redirects one to the awereness of ones situation in history. Oh, all you heroes (not) that live without a need for belonguing (yes in the religious sense: Religare)

  • @miguelbinha And you're not heroes because you can't feel the pain of separation. You don't feel it! You annalyse the concepts, brilliantly in my view, but you don't live the ultimate concequences of such reasonings for the justification of man's condition. You dress as a bunny, who knows as a reflux of your subconscious premonition of the possibility of the absurd, you look for the soothing nothingness of meditation. Assume your condition of lackness and cry like a lost boy.

  • Suffering has to be non-consensual. Really the point of some suffering is that it is about learning. To suffer hunger indicates that eating is a good idea, to suffer teeth pain marks going to the dentist and being better at brushing teeth. Suffering through a personal loss teaches that relationships matter to us etc etc.

    The worst suffering is the one that prevents the escape. Perpetual hunger, indefinite physical pain, sustained social deprivation when no lessons learned help.

  • Not a directly response to it but an earlier vid upon the same concern: /watch?v=azOnoqn83UU

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more