Added: 2 years ago
From: RussMoxham
Views: 12,147
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (255)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • look at his smile ? It says "ahah Hitler lost the war now we will still be in power and you all will work for us."

  • holocaustdenialvideosdotcom. codohdotcom, adolfthegreatdotcom

  • The art is cool, but are pigs really that bad? Most pigs I know of are a hell of a lot more benevolent than Hitler was.

  • jews r evil

  • @glockker i agree people are good at heart except jews, they are the source of world problems and crimes against humanity such as the holocaust

  • MUFTI MAT-YOYA!

    MUHAMAD MAT -YOYA!

    SAAR`IL BANAT-YOYA!

    BANAT AL SOUK-YOYA!

  • What does he want ? Money.

  • jews = 2 feets PiGs

  • You can do something similar with a $1 note and George Washington.

  • Maybe that is the truth he is saying,

    that it was all an illusion.

    Hitler said that the victors write the history.

    Is the truth that what we have been fed

    has all been no more truthful than a magician's slight of hand?

  • damn jews

  • 5 Million Germans are killed in WWII & this is a proven fact.

    Also this video sucks, no new information.

    OK now I know, if you folding 4 pigs you will get a Hitler face. WTF ☠

  • hitler is a pig. thats what the pic was saying..

  • oh my god :O

  • So Hitlers true form was a pig, would have never guessed.

  • What the hell did I just watch? What's the point of this video?

  • @Time2Keeper1 I'm sorry if the visual communication in the clip here didn't work for you. Given the context as described, I'd have thought the essential message was very clear. I take it to be that Hitler was not that great a guy.

  • Comment removed

  • @RussMoxham Well, personally the guy looked like he could've been a Kappo, with the evil look and all, so I wasn't sure what it was supposed to be.

  • @Time2Keeper1 I can see no hint of an evil look here. As far as I can see, Moldo is smiling--despite having lost most of his possessions, family, friends and community during the war. I daresay that if he were holding a Bible or a sandwich or if the information here did not state that he was Jewish, you would not be in a position to look at what seems to me a rather pleasant old man and to say: 'Aha, yes--it's obvious! He is an evil Jew and he probably betrayed his friends for soup.'

  • @RussMoxham Pleasant old man? He's peering into my soul!! But seriously, I understand if you are in "defense mode" but this movie was meant for nothing other than moral sensationalism. He probably betrayed his friends for soup, I don't know, but this has nothing to do with what he is, you didn't have to be a Jew to be a Kappo.

  • @RussMoxham

    that he is a jew is obvious to any non-oligophrenic person that has any minor knowledge of the jewish facial features.

    And that he is full of sh*t is obvious to any1 that knows anything about that part of ww2 history called "holocaust". By anything I mean of course historical facts, not the bullsh*t propaganda that you read in the newspapers or that your school teacher told you.

    Sieg Heil

  • @RussMoxham 6 million ya if thay count the survivors maybe fue jews died just for being jewish how many of thes jews were gay disabled mentaly or other wise as well as a kike what aloud a crap

  • @Time2Keeper1 " What's the point of this video?" It's just a part of 24/7 advertising of the "holocaust".

    Authors of this science fiction are aware that left without constant pressure people may start to thing .

    This crap should cut you of from logic.No matter how stupid it should be with you non stop.

    Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

  • UP YUR BUM TOTAL CRAP.

  • The figures come from the world census statistics and are available in various encyclopedias and almanacs among other publications. Look it up! Then keep telling us all about how so many were killed by Hitler. Jews were mouthing off about 6,000,000 Jews in Europe were dying of starvation, abused and displaced and this was in 1927. Make up you mind. A Jew can whine his ass off and at the same time stick a knife in your back.  You are worse than Muslims.

  • @SpincterManBubba Even if I were Jewish, I don't think you'd have any cause to judge me as such as opposed to treating me as an individual. As it is, your judgement is wholly inappropriate. And saying that these figures you cite like gospel 'are available in various encyclopedias' etc. is not an adequate attribution in my view. You may be right, but it's you who are bringing these figures to the table, so to my mind you are the one who ought to know who compiled them, how, why, when, etc.

  • In 1939 the world census estimated the world's Jew population to be 15,000,000 total. In 1946 the world census estimated the world's Jew population to be 15,000,000 total. Who died and how come there are so many that claim to be "Holocaust Survivors?" Interesting! Jews gave us that information and they also wrote the Bible. Doesn't say much for either source. How come only Jews and blacks have Sickle cell anemia. Simple, they are of the same bloodline.

  • @SpincterManBubba What census? Compiled by/for whom, from what data? 'So many' supposed Holocaust survivors? Not enough, to my mind. And most of them must be dead by now. You probably just have a bigot's hypersensitivity to Jews! And do Jews get sickle cell? It wouldn't follow that they were especially closely related to Blacks. Sickle cell is recessive, prone to die out in populations not exposed to malaria. Where malaria has existed, sickle cell has been linked to reduced susceptibility.

  • With the number of survivors growing every day, is it safe to say the evil Nazis didn't do as good a job killing Jews as advertised? ;)

  • @NSgreenRegime I'm not sure I entirely understand the question. Is there some science or statistics involved here or what? I think it's fair to say that even camp survivors had children, and that many of their children have had children, etc. Good for them.

  • @RussMoxham Jewry uses the Holocaust for profit and power; so much of it is fabricated; if they (the Jews) were universal in spirit, as they have so many believe, they'd open the public's eyes to the many mass atrocities.

    It's a sad world when my friends and family have no idea what happened in Russia, China and to the Germans, and only care about what happened to the poor innocent Jews.

    Why was it they were hated? Oh yeah, because Hitler was evil.

    What a fucking stupid consensus.

  • @NSgreenRegime The fact that not everyone knows what happened in Russia etc. doesn't imply that people shouldn't care/know what happened to the Jews. My feeling is that it'd be a worse world if people didn't know about at least some of these things. As to the Jews' having been 'hated'--in my view largely as the Jews, an ethnic group, without much regard for what any of them did as individuals: in my country at least, being hated is not a capital offence. What capital offence did they all commit?

  • @RussMoxham They lacked a natural connection to German soil and folk. Mankind is organic and thus one with the earth; Jews had no soil (until Israel) thus are detached from the earth, but still remained one with one another, therefore they've always depended upon a host who IS grounded to survive; yet they still aim to uproot the host, although to do so is detrimental to everyone including them. Even with Israel nothing's changed; it's like their operating base. I'm not speaking of every Jew.

  • @NSgreenRegime I'm really not sure I've heard such a load of pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo in my life. It sounds like a '50s sci-fi film. Apart from anything, if you consider the references to earth, land, etc. in the Bible (you could start with Genesis 3.19), you'll find that Jews have been singing and preaching about the earth for millennia. (They've also been walking around on it.) And Western ideas of a 'natural connection' to the land draw heavily on the (Jewish) Book of Genesis!

  • @RussMoxham It draws heavily from human nature, the Semitic book of rules and contradictions came later; and by and large denied nature! You can't draw someone like me (a pagan) into an "everything is doctrine" presupposition.

    The land where a man grows up is intrinsically a part of him forever, his personality and way he perceives life is in great part reflective of this relationship with the soil. Mankind's reverence and understanding of nature is prerequisite to man and earth survival.

  • @NSgreenRegime I don't doubt the importance of a human's connection (or lack of one) with the land. I come from a village of some 250 people. I doubt the importance of any connection to a *particular* land, state, etc. (geopolitical entity). At most, I think it's an emotional tie. To me it's far less important than kinship with one's fellow human. Your system also implies that migration is imperfect; I don't accept that. Humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers before farming and I am part 'Gypsy'!

  • @NSgreenRegime Also, you're probably aware that many of today's forms of paganism are, at best, reconstructed, whether, for instance, from modern conceptions of long-dead, poorly documented Celtic Druids or, in the case of Ásatrú, mainly from Icelandic sagas consigned to manuscript centuries after the events they purport to depict. Nobody, you will agree, is without roots and influences, but they're not always manifested the same way. Today's paganism is, as much as anything, counter-doctrine.

  • @NSgreenRegime Finally--excuse me for going on--you imply that Jews in, say, Germany were parasites because they supposedly lacked a natural connection to the (German) land of the kind that you posit. That raises the question whether every city dweller in the world who barely knows one end of a farm animal from the other isn't also a parasite. I don't think so. It's because city life became the norm that paganism, in response to it, has become so popular.

  • @RussMoxham Today's non-Jewish city dweller is diverse, I think, ranging from human waste to very high-quality. A great many non-Jews ARE parasitical money grubbers. And money is indeed the measurement of success and class in a man today - a consensus signifying Western man's degeneracy.

    Many of the greatest men in history lived in moderate poverty; they were among the highest on the aristocratic pyramid. Conversely the money grubber was considered among the lowest and weakest sort of man.

  • @RussMoxham The money obsessed strive for an abstract want-filling element that never satisfies because they lack potential for inner wholeness. Their downward looking of all others and willingness to ruin lives in their strive for more money is testament to their spiritual inferiority.

    As for pagan resurgence, I think it's demand by Nature herself, for its failing to resurge will mean the earth's destruction. Overpopulation and expansion of cities reflects the imbalance that must be corrected.

  • The jews perpetuate this holocaust rubbish to gain sympathy from the ignorant & promote an agenda of jewish supremacy. Not a single concentration camp resident addressed a complaint with SS officers concerning "alleged" atrocities at the concentration camps. The "death" camps were routinely inspected by the Deutsches Rotes Kreuz & operated within the guidelines enacted at the Wannsee Conference. The zionist swine were provided with food, shelter, clothing, sanitising showers, & medical care.

  • @Seadweller451E You lost me at 'holocaust rubbish', but--the Rotes Kreuz (Red Cross)? Really? How, I wonder, did those conversations go? (Guard: Would you like me to take you to the secret gas chamber now? Red Cross Official: No thank you, please just show me a few more smiling detainees and I can go.) Can you explain why there are also clear indications of large-scale concentration camp death among Slavs, Roma, disabled people, homosexuals, Freemasons, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc. etc.?!

  • Zionist swine!!!

  • @Seadweller451E Well, that one just made me snort (or oink?) in amusement. I'm not a Zionist; not a Jew; not even of Jewish descent as far as I know; and not prepared to throw a whole race, nation or ethnic group on the garbage heap without their having done the slightest thing collectively to taint even one fraction of a second of my life. In throwing around words such as 'swine' in this way, mostly people just demonstrate that they themselves lack human empathy/sympathy/compassion.

  • JEWS MURDER & SELL ARAB ORGANS!

    ORGAN TRAFFICKING IS NOW a multi-million dollar business. Couple this with the Zionists having an obsession for self-preservation and the Jewish Talmud’s view of Arabs being sub-human, Israel is a leading trafficer in the organ transplant business.

    The University of Tel Aviv’s Israel Institute for Forensic Medicine, operating under the cover of DNA profiling of “criminals,” (murdered Arab Palestinians), is the prime operator in the organ transplant business.

  • @MsPamAnn Wow, that's one of the most disturbing probable urban myths I've heard--right up there with Germans' eating Belgian babies in the First World War and, so it would seem, soap made from concentration camp detainees under the Nazis. You really should find an appropriate place to post the comment, i.e. not just on any old YouTube page that propagates the view that Jews are not inherently evil, hook-nosed Shylocks who use their mutant tentacles to steal companies and catch children to eat.

  • @MsPamAnn Just out of interest--I can see that it's something you're passionate about--how exactly do you murder an organ? Do you just play Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D Minor really badly?

  • WTF this old son of a bitch want to proove...that Hitler was 4 times a pig? Guess he had nothing else to do in Auschwitz than to draw....pathetic old crook! He should be thankful he got what to eat...

  • @Matthias3388 I believe what he is folding here was printed and widely circulated. If you already know enough about him to label him a crook (on what basis?) perhaps you would tell us what legal and/or moral code provided objective authority for the extermination of his family and most of his Jewish community in Corfu. Perhaps you would also explain how, why, to what end, etc.

  • @RussMoxham Perhaps i wold like to say many things and perhaps many of the things you know are well fixed into your own judgement...and perhaps it is useless to debate...

  • @Matthias3388 Thanks for a polite reply. I would hope as many people as possible who, for whatever reason, dislike Jews would at some point consider the idea that there was nothing that every one of these individuals--men, women, children and, I suppose, unborn babies/foetuses--did in the years before the Second World War to deserve to be rounded up without recourse to justice and, for instance, forced into hard labour, shot or gassed, to have their bones used to line driveways, etc.

  • @Matthias3388 Ignore him, he still refers to old Holocaust myths - now officially debunked by Holocaust historians.

    HE ignores that fact that hundreds of eyewitnesses (who reieved Holocaust respairations) have been proven frauds.

    HE ignores that fact that there is overwehlming physical evidence against the old and staged Holocaust evidence.

    HE even makes things up without being sure its so... e.g.. "But the Nazis were hardly about to leave Zyklon B containers around"

  • @VitaminsAndPiss It's easy to accept that claims etc. have been 'officially debunked' (hardly objective) when it suits one's purposes. Officially? By what official(s), then? Debunked? Or just plausibly contested? 'Overwhelming physical evidence against'? Feel free to list some, with academic references, so we needn't just take your word for it. What did I make up when I said that the Nazis were hardly about to leave Zyklon B around with full details of how they'd used it and what for?

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Also, however many people have made false Holocaust claims (e.g. to get money), I don't see how that puts the whole Holocaust in doubt. I think it's fair to say this is about more than a few hundred people. It's about a few million people who apparently existed before the war but not at the end of it. In places like Warsaw, there are still countless buildings officially owned by Jews who evidently went somewhere, without cashing in their assets, and never came back.

  • @RussMoxham And when I say 'officially' here about the ownership of buildings, I mean that there are, verifiably, large numbers of buildings listed in land registries under the names of Jews who evidently went somewhere in a hurry and never came back

  • @RussMoxham

    So what? Millions of men died because Jewish bankers/ Zionist started a war to destroy western culture and create Israel. It’s only a matter of time before the rich Jews at the top of the banking world leave America and the West to go to live in china. The poor Jews will be screwed once again but America and the other x British colonies are dead soon anyway. Just like Germany was in 1945. Only this time the enemy wont be so nice after the war.

  • @MsCivilwar You're typing lots of words that seem to make grammatical sense here but I've no idea what, if anything, most of them mean. I will say that Jewish bankers or Zionists had no need to start either world war to establish Israel (e.g. many Palestinian landowners were happy to sell up). You still haven't said how they caused, say, the second one anyway. By convincing Hitler to invade Czechoslovakia? Poland? By dictating the Treaty of Versailles? By shooting Franz Ferdinand back in 1914?

  • @RussMoxham

    Russ you are learning. I would say keep going but I dont think its best for u to learn what im talking about. Its better to stay uninformed and be proude of your jewish blood. No one like a self hater and thats what you will be when you realise WE ARE RIGHT.

  • @MsCivilwar You're a legend. So far I've traced (parts of) my family tree back to the early 1700s at least and--no sign of Jewish blood. (I'd be delighted if I had some.) It amuses me that people call a group of plotters a 'cabal' (ultimately derived from 'Kabbalah'), as if Jews were always getting together to chant in arcane ritual Hebrew about their plans for world conquest or something, when actually it's not so much the Jews who skulk in the shadows or talk mumbo-jumbo as most neo-Nazis.

  • @RussMoxham Thats right, they didi it to get money, not only did they turn out to be the people with the most 'chilling' stories, but the government or holocaust historians never caught them out on it. It was revisionists and 'rouge' historians.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Thanks, as ever, for replying, but you can't expect to put the world to rights in 41 words. None of this stuff is debunked just because you say it is or because you read something about it once that impressed you. So elaboration would be welcome. Alternatively--who the hell are you to deny the stories of a few thousand people you never met?! How much evidence do you want? A few thousand witnesses not enough? Why not? Because you don't like what they're saying? Well, tough.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss And still the most telling piece of evidence, which you have yet to address, is the sheer paucity of Jews in post-war Central and Eastern Europe. Did they all cease to exist to make money too?! Did you meet them before they vanished?

  • @RussMoxham Yes, sorry, I forgot that you enjoy lecturing over 2 comments, only one registered in my message bank.

    You should look into how many European Jews litterally changed their names from Yiddish to Slavic names after 1945, when the iron curtain was tossed over half of Europe, and the millions that changed their names from Yiddish to Hebrew from 1945 up until the mid-1950s.

    ANd when a final demographic assessment was done in the 1950s, why so many 'disappeared'.

    Explainations...

  • @VitaminsAndPiss As to the first part, about 'lecturing over 2 comments'--sorry, you lost me there.

    Anyhow, if you're correct, it was very nice and devilishly clever of all those name-changing Jews to leave their property to non-Jews in Central and Eastern Europe and donate so many assets to the Nazis. Really?! Do you even listen to yourself?!

  • @VitaminsAndPiss My point, about the properties in, say, Warsaw that are still legally registered under Jewish names from before the Holocaust, is no longer really about the names. Many such properties were claimed by councils and other authorities and handed on to third parties, i.e. it was a change of de facto ownership, not of names. The only reason this was possible is that the legal owners were not around to complain. So where did they go without selling their properties?

  • @RussMoxham DUDE! millions of Jews changed their names, why don't you just bother to see (research) what I'm talking about if your such a truth seeker.

    BTW 2 million Jews dissapeared into ASia over the Ural mountains between 1941 - 1942 during the massive Soviet retreat into its own interior. thats 2 million in 1 year that were 'exterminated' right there.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss By my calculation, the Urals are about 3,000 km east of Warsaw, i.e. far into Russia and beyond the Nazis' essential sphere of influence; perhaps you'd care to explain what population(s) of (alleged) victims of extermination the 2 million people you mention here are even supposed to account for.

  • @RussMoxham Dude, i can't keep doing this.

    Its childish.

    You haven't been able to counter anything I have said. Just mention something else.

    Believe it or not, you in denial.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss The philosopher Sir Karl Popper (with his Jewish heritage) pointed out more than 75 years ago that saying someone was in denial was unscientific because it did not allow for disproof (or, in his terminology, it was not 'falsifiable'). That is, you just did the intellectual equivalent of telling me there was no Holocaust because you say so. I still hold the imperfect testimony/arguments of a few thousand Jews (and others) in higher regard than yours. But thank you for popping by.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss With regard, again, to these 2 million Jews, if you know about them then it hardly seems likely to me that the historical consensus on the Holocaust completely neglects them. In any case, for our purposes here, I'm not sure it matters what any Jew was doing in the Urals (let alone to the east of them) in the early '40s; you fail to establish that these 2 million are among the millions allegedly exterminated a few thousand km west of the Urals.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss And the same goes for Jews who changed their names. You know about them because they're part of the historical discussion that has informed the consensus--i.e. the fact that you know about them does not support revisionist claims.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Anyone familiar with Jewish literature also knows it's not big on pastoral imagery, because Jews learned to associate country life with vulnerability. It's therefore not clear to me what on earth the Holocaust deniers think could have motivated a couple of million Jews to undertake the expedition into Central Russia before the Final Solution even reached its height. Whatever they're supposed to have been running so far away from Central Europe for--it must have been bad.

  • @RussMoxham Deborah Lipstadt, a Holocaust historian, look quotes up by her, she debunks the soap myth, and it was either her or another one that debunked the 'bones on roads' lie.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss OK, so you're citing one historian and you're not even sure whether she alone (or she and 'another one'--one?!) made all the points you've mentioned. That's not really much of a law case, now is it? I certainly don't see that it gives you just cause to go around saying this or that has been 'debunked'. How do the (presumably disputed) arguments of one or even two historians beat the reports from, say, numerous camp survivors?

  • @VitaminsAndPiss While I now understand that Lipstadt and many other Jewish scholars reject the soap claim--thanks for mentioning it--she is a professor of Jewish and Holocaust studies. The historian David Irving sued her and her publishers for accusing him of Holocaust denial. So the one authority you've named as far as I can remember could hardly be less of a Holocaust denier. It's a bit like scouring 'Mein Kampf', finding one nice sentence about Jews and denying the Holocaust because of that.

  • @ExtacyOfMorbidDeath Now, what if I turned around and said this were actually a Christian? Impossible? Why? I don't see any cartoon tentacles or a comedy nose. I don’t see any skullcap or rabbi curls. I don’t see any features at all that tell me what’s in this man’s pants or his heritage. If you can’t judge him as a person--as anything other than a Jew--in my opinion you are, at best, selling yourself far too short.

  • whats the point of this cunting video?

  • @ivorbigonee Does it cunting need one?

  • @RussMoxham yes.

  • @ivorbigonee Oh, OK--I didn't know that. I thought YouTube was just a place for people to post video clips. You're probably going to have a job on your hands weeding out the pointless videos.

  • I HOPE U DIE FROM CANCER TOGETHER WITH UR KIDS AND GRANDSONS

  • @nektorhond I welcome such comments; they show me why I posted these clips

  • Awwwww Look...you took a family portrait of my Jewish family and folded it into a portrait of Adolf. That is nice artwork. :o)

  • @HitlerWasRight2010 OK, so we've established that Hitler fans don't like Jews. Does anyone else have any interesting points to make?

  • 0:15, look a his smug Jew smile.

    I bet you he's thinking.

    "I can say the most outragous shit [like I saw gas chambers] and people will believe me because I did a retarded paper folding of Hitler that had pigs on it."

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Maybe he's happy to meet someone who doesn't hate him for having survived hell or happening to have been born Jewish. Claims of genocide are not as extreme as the fact that people who weren't even born when the alleged acts took place presume not only to deny all the claims but also to condemn the thousands of people who have made them.

  • @RussMoxham Yes, very good, very liberal, blah blah...

    THe holocaust was a hoax, and this Jew is a liar.

    Somehow 'Labour camps with delousing facilities'...

    turned into 'Death camps with no delousing facilities, but the Nazis still gave you a haircut and tatoos before they gassed you, apparently'

    I bet your to brainwashed to even know what i'm stabbing at.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss You're conflating numerous different claims and situations here. I don't think alleged survivors of any of these camps generally claim the camps were all the same, that everyone was treated identically or that what happened, say, at Auschwitz during a certain month/year was the same as what happened there the next. Far from it. Incidentally, calling people brainwashed just because they disagree with you is clearly an indiscriminate response and, as such, ineffective.

  • @RussMoxham Your brainwashed because you have very little knowledge of the Revisionist arguement, which is not replyed to with a proper rebuttal by holocaust supporters, but with "Hey, anti-Semetic shut up!"

    Once you see the Revisionist arguement, you'll understand why people have such blatan hostile attitudes towards these bogus documentries that repeat fabricated sources and call it fact.

    I'm not brainwashed, I've heard the official story my hwole life, and believed it for most.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss That I find most revisionist claims (I hesitate to say 'arguments'--I've seen no real revisionist logic on YouTube at least) irrational doesn't mean I'm brainwashed. It means I have respect for logic and Occam's razor. I feel that any logical disproof of the Holocaust would have to be far longer, contain more variables and therefore be less credible than any proof. It makes little sense to me that people who weren't there presume to rubbish all Holocaust claims.

  • @RussMoxham Hmmm, yes, well the evidence for the Holocaust arguement are entirely eyewitness, indeed, many of these people saw horrible things, but not gas chambers.

    These have been 100s of eyewitnesses living in Israel whih have been proven (and not by their own government) to be frauds.

    The revisionist argument is based entirely on physical evidence...

    There is NO proof of Zyklone B ever being used in the supposed gas chamber.

    Ground penerating radar has found no mass graves. So on

  • @VitaminsAndPiss One of revisionism's key problems is--it relies on an 'argumentum ex silentio' (argument from silence); it builds on an alleged lack of evidence of holocaust, not on positive evidence of its own. But the Nazis were hardly about to leave Zyklon B containers around with labels saying: 'We used this in the shower blocks--see records/ask attendants for details'. We still have Nuremberg, a critical mass of eyewitness reports (see the British Library's 'Voices of the Holocaust'), etc.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss As for how (un)reliable eyewitness testimony can sometimes be--in my country, a generation of people (mostly men) who survived such horrors as the Battle of the Somme in the First World War returned with stories and memories that changed over time, but the interviews that were done with them still tell us something of the reality. One person's story may be true or false. When thousands of people tell essentially the same story, or did, for decades, that is something else.

  • As a mattar of fact the Nazis left thousands of cans of Zyklon B at Auschwitz, no one denies that. Its on the display at Auschwitz, cans of Zyk .B.

    Now the problem is that the gas chamber that was KNOWN (but not mentioned) to be used for delousing is still registered off the charts for Zyk. B detection, but the official gas chamber has no traces of Zyk. B.

    Bones to line driveways? Pfft...

    That was debunked 20 years ago along with the 'skin as soap' myth.

    Your sources are old

  • @VitaminsAndPiss What is "the 'skin as soap' myth"? I've not heard of making soap from skin--fat, yes, but not skin. Skin for lampshades, fat for soap--those are the claims, I think (though not mine). Again, if you have academic references (useful in connection with words like 'debunked'), they would be welcome. Bones (ash) to line driveways? Not my claim--Primo Levi's, for one. I suspect he knew more about Auschwitz than you do; he stayed there. My sources--old? Like the camp survivors. So?

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Let's cut to the chase here: how would you account for the clear collapse in the numbers of Jews across Central and Eastern Europe before 1945? Where did they go? Where did the culture go? Where, just for instance, did a huge chunk of the population of the Old Town in Vilnius in Lithuania actually GO--if not to its collective death in the camps? We can debate about the murder weapon (all properly attributed information is welcome) but--hasn't there been a murder here?!

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Your own authority, Deborah Lipstadt, refutes most of this at some length in an article on the BBC History website. Anyone interested can copy and paste, say, the sentence 'Deborah Lipstadt discusses how misinformation and false claims are used to question the reality of the Nazis' attempt to exterminate Europe's Jews' into a search engine.

  • @RussMoxham I know she defends the Holocaust fraud, thats normal...

    but she rufutes, with real evidence, and as someone with her occupation, that soap myth, which I happen to hear is still being told in schools today as fact. Varoius other stupid myths such as the 'pelvis ashtray' and 'shrunken Nazi heads' have been refuted by the people that created them the US ARmy 'Psyche Warfare Team'.

    The Nazis hated Jews, thats a fact, they did horrible things to them, thats a fact. No gas chambers.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss But it's at best selective or partisan to accept an academic's arguments when it comes to refuting some of what I at least see as some of the more extreme claims (let's say about soap) and then to dismiss the same person's arguments (let's say Lipstadt's) when it comes to the essential claim about gassing. Lipstadt clearly argues that Jews and others were gassed, so why is she an authority you think it's worth citing when and only when she says something that you believe?

  • @RussMoxham O.K. dude. Whatever creates the reality you want..

    "In WWII

    It was naught naughty HItler against good good goody Allied good guys. Democracy was delievered and that is why the US is constantly at war with some country, somewhere in the world since 1945 and justifies this with the holocaust story, because naughty bad evil Germany was naughty evil naughty bad and that is why the US must invade Korea, Vietnam, Iraq (1991), etc..."

    Sleep well honey (kiss on forehead).

  • @VitaminsAndPiss If the States fabricated the Holocaust, to justify fighting Nazi Germany, why were US forces in Europe on such a scale? So the States could destroy it and then pay to make it wealthier than ever with the Marshall Plan?! And if the States had bothered to fabricate the Holocaust to justify war with Germany, methinks it would've wanted more than Pearl Harbor or mere utilitarianism to justify the killing of a few hundred thousand defenceless civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss This also seems illogical to me because, with US backing, my own country, the UK, for one declared war against Germany as early as 1939, years before the worst Nazi atrocities were inflicted on Jews, Slavs, Roma, Freemasons, Jehovah's Witnesses, disabled people, homosexuals, etc. and obviously before the UK or the States knew about them. UK Prime Minister Chamberlain was clearly keen to avoid war, acquiescing to Germany's seizure of the Sudetenland. But the Nazis wouldn't quit.

  • @VitaminsAndPiss Before war broke out in Europe in 1939, multiple countries had to turn a blind eye, for instance, to the Nazi militarisation of the Rhineland in 1936, which broke the terms of peace after the First World War. While many Austrians were clearly delighted when the Nazis arrived in 1938, it's plain from contemporary footage that the same was not true when the Nazis went on from the Sudetenland to seize the rest of Czechoslovakia in 1939--let alone Poland. Whose fault is it anyway?

  • That's supposed to wow everyone? Fuck him. He should not have survived. Him or anyone else who stood in the way. Everyone knows that the reason jews don't eat pork is that even jews don't practice cannibalism.

  • @norseman58 'Stood in the way'? Of what? Of all the other nameless men, women and children being shuffled into the shower blocks? Of an empire that would have been happy to wipe that English language of yours from the face of the earth? If, on some level, you're really a Norseman and not just a wannabe, perhaps you will understand a little Icelandic (which is very close to Old Norse): Farðu í rass og rófu fávitinn þinn.

  • @RussMoxham kill yourself, you pretentious douche-bag. Every strong Alpha-male from Europe either died in ww1 or ww2, or migrated to America. Faggots like you are why the strong Norse no longer live in Europe. Read up on some real history after you remove the cock from your ass. Suck Dick minn, Gyðingur

  • @norseman58 Pretentious? I'm not the one calling himself 'norseman'. I lived in Iceland for 5 years, I'm a member of the Icelandic Embassy's choir in London, I'm a professional translator of Scandinavian languages for the US Govt et al. and at university (BA Hons Modern Icelandic) I won the nationwide Townsend Award of the Viking Society for Northern Research for my academic work in the field of Mediaeval Scandinavian studies. Most of what you think you know about the Norsemen, I know is wrong.

  • @RussMoxham Thanks for the list of accolades, choir-boy. Don't care about what some academic fag has awarded you. I don't care about what you think you know about Northern Europe. I worked for the Government too. Norseman was a call-sign given to me when I was In 3rd battalion 5th Marines.

  • @norseman58 And there was I thinking it was probably just a pretentious way of saying 'Minnesotan' or something of the kind. Were there any other scholars of Scandinavian history in your company?

  • @norseman58 Ég get undirstrikað hvað þú ert fáfróð/ur um norræn mál og menningu með því einasta að skrifa þetta á íslensku, sem þú munt ekkert skilja, þótt þú þykist vera norræn/n, nema kannski ef þú notir þýðingarforrit eins og forritið sem þú hefur notað til að finna orðið „Gyðingur‟ (sem annars á ekkert við mig) án þess að geta einu sinni skrifað heila niðrandi setningu. Þó ætla ég ekki að biðja þig totta mig; ekki myndi ég telja það vera sæmilega hegðun fyrir mig sem gagnkynhneigðan karl.

  • @MsPamAnn Nice venom. Now try reason.

  • It seems that these people known as the one's who Hitler killed always leave a secret code behind on everything, like an owl on a dollar bill, their pyramid with their one eye the new world order symbol under it. I think if we jump out to the bigger picture and see that in history the same was done from the romans and earlier it makes us think then why does history keep repeating its self, with acts against these peoples. their society could have a big secret that we dont know all know of.

  • @MrSinantra Are you insinuating that there is a close relationship between Freemasonry and Judaism? I don't know whether the Nazis thought so when they were killing members of either group. Anyway the fact (or alleged fact?) that the Nazis did kill them does not imply there was just cause to do so. The Nazis also victimised political dissidents, homosexuals, Roma Gypsies, disabled people, Jehovah's Witnesses, Slavs, et al. All of these were people, treated--at best--like animals.

  • @RussMoxham There is a connection between Ashkenazi Khazar Jews and the freemasons. Further to that, Zionists and the people controlling the worlds banks. This is what brought about the war.. and wars that continue today. It's no secret Vietnam was about money, that Iraq had no WMD's and that billions were 'lost' (to the bankers) in lucrative contracts over there. The mistake Hitler made was to discriminate against ALL Jews, and the other groups.

  • @PeterGratrex What Hitler did was wrong, but the Allies are equally, if not more guilty of genocide and attrocities in the war. You only need look up Allied & Soviet war crimes to scratch the surface. The bombing of Dresden, the Katyn forest massacre (blamed on the Nazi's), American treatment of American Japanese during the war, and German's after the war. In total, this left tens of hundreds of thousands dead. But because Hitler lost, his deeds were exaggerated, and only he is painted evil..

  • @PeterGratrex Although I disagree with the equality of deeds statement you made, I do think people neglect to realize the damage the Allies did. My mother was a child in Frankfurt, being "protected" as a "perfect" child in Hitler's eyes. Before and after she was shipped off to Poland and Russia for "protection", she witnessed unbelievable horrors that haunted her until her death in 2006. Year later, after marrying my father, she came to America and was treated like a monster.

  • @PeterGratrex I agree that people overlook Allied war crimes in the Second World War, but frankly, Hitler's 'deeds' don't need a lot of exaggeration to look bad. Death camps and the desolation of a country--a continent --are ample material for negative spin.

  • @RussMoxham For sure, but one has to question just how many people were killed in these so called 'death camps' which were originally built to keep political prisoners and for labour. Auschwitz had a swimming pool and a theatre for inmates. Hitler was largely working in the interests of the Germanic people as he regained territories lost from WWI before France and Britain declared war. He was then more or less forced to expand to avoid getting surrounded or fight on two fronts (kinda ironic).

  • @PeterGratrex I think it's OK to question anything reasonably, but the presence of a swimming pool etc. in Auschwitz says little. The Nazis knew it was often easiest to treat people like animals while letting them retain some sense of humanity (and perhaps a little hope). Some people were taken to the camps in fancy railway carriages, not cattle trucks. The front end of Treblinka was allegedly fitted out as a normal train station, to pacify new arrivals, making them easier to control.

  • @PeterGratrex Also, I think you're stretching it when you say 'Hitler was largely working in the interests of the Germanic people'. Even if I replace 'Germanic' with 'German' (the Anglo-Saxons and Franks were Germanic too), and admit Hitler tried to serve German interests, he did so by violating the terms of peace, biting off more than he could chew and precipitating a war on multiple fronts that ruined Germany. Arguably, whatever his aims, he worked as much against German interests as for them.

  • @PeterGratrex I'm not sure discontentment with the status quo is just or sufficient cause for mass murder

  • @MrSinantra Anyway I think the popular fascination with Masonic and Classical imagery often derives (ironically) from a lack of historical awareness. A lot of Classical imagery never went away; the peoples who succeeded the Roman Empire adopted it (along with Christianity, Classical legal structures, etc.). The use of some of it has continued to be a way for ruling elites to give themselves an air of authority. To me this is neither mysterious nor sinister.

  • @MrSinantra I think almost always when conspiracists talk about 'them', 'these people', etc. with reference to supposed hidden elites, such language disguises fuzzy thinking. All anyone achieves by talking about 'them' in this way is to deny the need for specific statements about particular people and to distance themselves from objective analysis of the matter--or people--at hand. Bring me the head of one of 'these people' on a plate and maybe I'll know to whom you're referring.

  • four kinds of a pig right ? Yeah that sounds right

  • I love pork. More for me.

  • @ThorOdinson14 More for or more like?

  • @MsCivilWar, this is just pathetic. I say my background is Christian, I even quote the New Testament some places here on YouTube, and you decide I'm a Jew. Because... what? I have a dark complexion? Or you have to be Jewish to acknowledge the Holocaust or to challenge the idea of any Jewish conspiracy? Look, Jesus (or Yeshua) was the King of the Jews. The New Testament is all about Jesus' claim to the throne of David, about Jesus' claim to be the fulfilment of Jewish prophecy, about--LOVE.

  • @RussMoxham

    No, I have not counted you as one of the two Jewish people I know. The reason I assumed you were Jewish was your one sided arguments, but if im wrong thats fine. Im happy to admit to being wrong. I hope you never have to suffer for being white, with the way things are going we white people will be a minority very soon and then even you will see what we are on about.

  • @RussMoxham

    Your still going on about that. .........

  • lol,,, that is kickass...and the guy is like thinking is that cool r what lol ,,,,great :)

  • MsCivilwar, it's at least arrogant to say most people don't know the truth. I mean, OK, you have your opinion, but what puts you in a position to say a few thousand people who claim to be death camp survivors (or don't talk about the camps at all) know less than you do about what did or didn't happen to them, or about the reasons? It makes no sense.

  • @RussMoxham I understand your intentions are good, but you fail to see there is truth in the extreme rights version of events. Until you can look at our arguments and prove them wrong, you are just a sheep pushing other peoples lies.

  • Good one Jew! Did you spend all your time in Auschwitz making that. I'm guessing with all the spare time you had aside from swimming (in the Auschwitz swimming pool) reading (in the Auschwitz library) and watching plays (in the Auschwitz theatre) you must have done something to pass the time.

  • Judas666Schrader--that's a discussion/rant/bizarrely inhuman comment we've already had. I still prefer holiday camps where the staff don't kill the guests.

  • Suggesting that the arbeitslager were much better than history suggests is simply a discussion/argument. If you would spend the time to actually do the research without falling into some pathetic moral dilema fuelled by your bias, you would not be arguing with me.

  • Biased, yes. Against genocide.

  • Judas666, here's a story to illustrate what I'm feeling here.

    One BBC reporter who went to Rwanda during the Rwanda Genocide in 1994 saw a funeral procession involving an ultra-long coffin and asked why. The answer was that a woman had been impaled or effectively raped to death with a tree. As nobody could extract the tree, it and the woman were buried together.

    That's up there with the worst of man's inhumanity to man. So was the Holocaust. This stuff just does not need to happen.

  • and another note to all you non-jews who read these comments... google "day of attonement" you can see what the jews celebrate yearly. they swear to lie to non-jews and deceive them whenever possible. go look it up! see if im lying!

  • johnpaps, it's 'atonement', and if anyone out there wants to know about Jews--maybe they should meet some Jews.

  • I know two. They both back stab and one is extremly cheap when it comes to money. The other one would sell his bestfriend for $10 bucks.

  • I'm sorry--again... I don't want to be rude here, but this is like a bad joke. You know two Jews (I think you meant) so... what? You're an expert on Judaism or Jewish ethics or something?

    Did you ever think maybe these two Jews' acted the way they act for some other reason than that they're Jewish?! Where's the logic?

    I might as well say something like--I know a guy from Sweden and he doesn't have any hair. So--what does it prove or even suggest?!

  • RussMoxham ... who the hell are you really?

    you say youre not jewish yet you seem to spend a hell of a lot of time defending the jews and bashing JESUS whenever you can. you either have no life or, you are working for your rabbi by posting your crap here trying to defend all the scum jews of the world. EITHER WAY, YOURE A BIG LOSER! GO HANG YOURSELF!

  • P.S. johnpaps, in case you're not clear on this (I forget who knows and who doesn't), my background is Christian. I wouldn't say I'm really a Christian or anything else myself--maybe a humanist--but anyway, if I were really a Christian, I wouldn't believe in genocide... not if I'd read the Bible anyway...

  • Your a jew dont lie.

  • i know at least 20 jews and they are all cheap, rich and racist against non-jews... what does that prove??? how many do i have to know before im worthy of an opinion??? jews are treated like parasites because thats what they are. they have been the way they are since the begining of time. they have been kicked out of countries countless times in history. why? think! enough with your "poor unfortunate people" argument. they just get whats coming to them.they get what they ask for!

  • johnpaps, I'm not bashing Jesus. Saying he was a rabbi is not bashing him--it's a fact. I've quoted the New Testament on these pages, so I'm not sure what you mean. You're the one who's rubbishing the principle of Christian love. I'm guessing Jesus would not have been a fan of Hitler.

  • As for Jews and finance (that old chestnut!)--you remember Jesus threw the money-lenders out of the temple? So, his followers saw money-lending as unholy. Jews who didn't think he was the Messiah had no reason to agree. Later, in Christian societies where Christians would not lend money, some Jews would. Had there been no (Christian) market for their services, they'd have gone out of business. Banking was often one of the few professions that were open to Jews, because to Christians it was not.

  • there you go again with your anti-christian jabs... youre jewish alright, im sure of it. as for money lending, jews got into that because christians lend money without charging intrest. intrest is a jewish idea.

    dont try defending the guilty. jews are the scum of the earth. jews are the only religious group who knowingly deceive others for monetary gain. its in their filthy blood to do so.

  • @johnpaps lol im sorry sir but i believe the whole world does that huh??? lol..

  • Actually, johnpaps, 'jews got into that' because there was pretty much nothing else profitable they were legally or even practically allowed to do in Christian society. Christians were forbidden to lend money because of Jesus' view of money lenders. Jews didn't have to think about Jesus' teaching. And people wanted to borrow money, so Jewish money lending was tolerated. As for all that other stuff--rhetoric can be interesting, but logical argument is stronger.

  • That Chestnut hay. So you know about it but have convinced your self its not true and im just a hater for bringing it up right.

  • And in, say, Tsarist Russia, in Jewish communities that often came under attack from a whole bunch of different kinds of people from the Tsar's Cossack cavalry down, and where people might see everything they owned destroyed without warning in minutes (and why?), of course people were careful with money. The alternative was likely starvation. This isn't rocket science. Slavery has left its mark on African-American culture and 1,500+ years of anti-Semitism have left their mark on many Jews.

  • Yes your such a victim. Keep playing the victim so no one else is allowed to point out all the wrongs your culture or religion has brought on western society.

    This excuse is starting to run thin. And when the dumb sheep work out what really happen in ww2 they will want to kill all of you again and for real this time.

  • Actually, MsCivilwar, you know what? Keep abusing me. Pile it on like maple syrup. Coming from a Christian background, I ought to know how to turn the other cheek ;) I've got to say, there are few things more poignantly satisfying to me than being criticised or even attacked for standing up, in some small way, for human rights.

  • You are a jew didnt we clear that up weeks ago?

    I'm a human and have rights. Your a dope who has run out of dumb arguments.

  • @MsCivilwar Erm, you cleared it up. For your purposes. By circumventing what most people consider as the necessity of having a leg to stand on. You said before that you knew two Jews. Well, if you counted me there (I don't think you did, actually) you only knew one. Look, I don't mind people thinking maybe I'm Jewish, but some kind of reason might be nice. Tony Bennett used to walk at the front of civil rights marches with Martin Luther King and co. So what? He must be black?

  • Anyhow, johnpaps, what's your point? Iranian ayatollahs have been yelling 'death to America' for decades, but I don't think that's a good argument for carpet-bombing the place. An ENTIRE ETHNIC/SOCIAL/NATIONAL GROUP needs to do something pretty darn bad, down to THE LAST MAN/WOMAN/CHILD, to deserve to be exterminated. Some people would say that, in the Jews' case, that something was the Crucifixion. I don't buy it. Christ was Jewish, and is not known for advocating genocide.

  • where do you spin your webs buddy?

    you got even me confused. iranians live in iran. jews live everywhere. they deceive their host nations for the benefit of israel. im done arguing with you. theres no sense to your lies and justifications. all your proofs are the lies older jews cemented as proofs to the unknowing or unsuspecting peoples of the world. GOD knows the truth and JESUS wil judge you all.

  • My point, paps, is that the mere fact that someone (say, a Jew who observes Atonement, or an ayatollah saying 'death to America') doesn't share all your values is not a valid argument for wholesale slaughter. What would life be like if we all had to be the same?! I don't expect people to be put to death for being different. Apart from anything, it's an affront to the liberal values that give you the freedom to speak of Jesus here.

    As for judgement--'judge not, lest ye be judged' (Matt: 7.1)

  • Incidentally, johnpaps--sorry that I find myself belabouring this point--Jesus was a Jew. Anyhow I don't think anyone who's prepared to say that 'JESU