it depends on year, from 1998-2000 all the ls1's made around 280-290RearWheel HP even in the vette, 285-295hp at wheels with WS6/SS, but the 01-02 LS1's in the F bodys got the new LS6 Z06 vette intake,injectors(28lb per hr) bigger throttle body,ls6 clutch. Machines werent re-tooled again for the last 2 yrs of production so they used LS6 parts. 6.0L truck cams installed because they had more hp than vette from the ls6 parts. WS6 was made by ASC in 01-02 and had 300-315rwhp and beat the vettes.
@kief4diamonds now cobras on the other hand....i hand out much respect...ive got two under my belt now...but they are lightly modded. and thats only cuz i go from a dig with a stalled auto in a street race past 90mph i get passed....my friends black 04 has headers pulley and intake bassani and a tune and hes at 460rwhp and he barely caught back up with me at 95-100mph. cold night for the s/c too. i love both cars though...wish i had both.
WS6 makes around 325 to the rear. Upgrade with a better clutch and lightweight flywheel and you'll up it by maybe 15 or 20 cause you lose about 50 horsepower from the crank to the wheels. So basically the LS1 engine makes 375 at the crank. With a cam, full exhaust manifold, and a clutch and flywheel you could be into the mid 12's in the quarter depending on your elevation. At sea level with a damn good driver they can do almost solid 13. Hope that helps.
@sabbathofcolorblack i drove a 5.0 2011 the other day and its just not as much of a drivers car as the t.a........if you can get a trans am you should.....mustang will probably never die.......gm is retarted.
it depends on year, from 1998-2000 all the ls1's made around 280-290RearWheel HP even in the vette, 285-295hp at wheels with WS6/SS, but the 01-02 LS1's in the F bodys got the new LS6 Z06 vette intake,injectors(28lb per hr) bigger throttle body,ls6 clutch. Machines werent re-tooled again for the last 2 yrs of production so they used LS6 parts. 6.0L truck cams installed because they had more hp than vette from the ls6 parts. WS6 was made by ASC in 01-02 and had 300-315rwhp and beat the vettes.
mrsrazzle1 6 months ago
jakemyster27..... its around 350 @ the flywheel
CobraKiller04 2 years ago
@CobraKiller04 your right.
kief4diamonds 1 year ago
@kief4diamonds now cobras on the other hand....i hand out much respect...ive got two under my belt now...but they are lightly modded. and thats only cuz i go from a dig with a stalled auto in a street race past 90mph i get passed....my friends black 04 has headers pulley and intake bassani and a tune and hes at 460rwhp and he barely caught back up with me at 95-100mph. cold night for the s/c too. i love both cars though...wish i had both.
kief4diamonds 11 months ago
If its stock i'd guess 315 at the rear.
Transam941 4 years ago
do you know that for fact? I'm considering a trans am over a mustang GT and if thats true that would definitley help out my choice. thanks mate
sabbathofcolorblack 4 years ago
WS6 makes around 325 to the rear. Upgrade with a better clutch and lightweight flywheel and you'll up it by maybe 15 or 20 cause you lose about 50 horsepower from the crank to the wheels. So basically the LS1 engine makes 375 at the crank. With a cam, full exhaust manifold, and a clutch and flywheel you could be into the mid 12's in the quarter depending on your elevation. At sea level with a damn good driver they can do almost solid 13. Hope that helps.
lpxstr33tsoldier 3 years ago
@sabbathofcolorblack i drove a 5.0 2011 the other day and its just not as much of a drivers car as the t.a........if you can get a trans am you should.....mustang will probably never die.......gm is retarted.
kief4diamonds 1 year ago
without numbers this vid is pointless >.>
Destinedtodie 4 years ago