Added: 4 years ago
From: fearmyaim112
Views: 8,853
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hey nice video here but it would be cool if you could set in the description of the song but please reply me and tell me what awsome song that is

  • A tribute to the bravest of the brave - the US GIs.

    We owe all of you a great debt - those of you who fought, and also those that didn't fight. Let us not forget the non-coms - the medics, the ambulance drivers and the women, the WASPs, who often flew dangerous missions.

  • no britain wins ww2

  • @Chelseaboy13UKM4 NO THE FUCKING ALLIES WON WW2 NOT ONE NATION!

  • War is hell on all sides, in reality there is no "evil nazi beasts".

  • The Russian winter saved the Russians. Otherwise the Germans would have taken Moscow and the oil fields.

  • The Russian winter saved Russia or the Germans would have taken Moscow and the oil fields. Napoleon suffered a similiar fate.

  • The Russian winter saved Russia or the Germans would have taken Moscow and the oil fields. Napoleon suffered a similiar fate.

  • So.... this video...

    Wheres the British?

    The French?

    The Germans?

    The Russians?

    The Canadians?

    The OTHER forces who fought in world war 2?

    Typical as usual...

  • Just because Russia lost the most soldiers to the war does not mean they did the most to defeat the Germans.

  • officially ussr destroyed 85% of nazi war "machine", reach berlin and finish hitler campaign... All this after a cowardly and unexpected invasion. Imagine germany taking power of moscow. the 2ww and recent history would be a bit different.

    Even nowadays russia makes all years parades to tribute all who was sacrified to that war. Something that i never saw in usa. Americans have probably the best army in the world but who cares? that means more impact in wars?

    anyway u're wrong.

  • That's funny, 85%? Germany committed 3 million troops to Operation Barbarossa and 8 million to the entire war effort. It was evenly matched between the Russians on Eastern front and the Brits and Americans on Western front and the North Africa Campaign. Also, the US Military has made a point of never wasting time on training military personnel for military parades.

  • well according official data: "Over 4.5 million troops of the Axis powers invaded the USSR"

    And other 8 million that u list includes german troops destroyed outside ussr by ussr.

    u're obviously a american but don't be a crook as many ones.

    btw, for ur information there's military parades in all countries. that one I mentioned is more relevant since it honors fighters of ww2. Its not a question wasting time.

    wrong again.

  • So 4.5 millon plus 8 million were destroyed by the USSR alone? That's 150% of German troops committed to the entire war effort. Also, the Victory Parades you speak of honor the Politburo more than any one soldier. Dragging out the anti-aircraft batteries and ICBM engines to Red Square was more of a show of strength to the West than to honor the fallen soldiers of WWII. Especially since many of those soldiers were sent right back to the Gulag system where they came from after the war.

  • Germany deployed roughly 150 Divisional equivalents inside Russia. From 1943 onwards, the Germans deployed 122 divisions from Norway to France. Thus by D-Day, the Germans were equally committed on both the Eastern and Western Fronts.

  • If it wasnt for Russia Germany had defeated USA and England in less then a month.

  • @zingovalp

    So... why did Germany loose the Battle of Britain then?

  • Germany dindnt lose. Only the small part of luftwaffe stationed in France.

  • @krabbfiskarnful

    ...So if Germany didn't loose, then why did they not invade Britain? After the Battle of Britain Germany didn't invade Britian because they didn't have the air supremacy which was needed, so they invaded Russia. Think about it, Germany could of kept going with out the "small" part of luftwaffe stationed in France.

  • The reason Germany didnt won the war was becuase of the dumbass Hitler.

  • Yes that's why Hitler managed to take over most of Europe, minus Britain.

    They could of won, if Britain hadn't of kicked their arses in the Battle of Britain!

  • Well actually Britain took more casualties during the battle becuase luftwaffe had better fighters (BF109) compered to Hurricane and Spitfire.

  • Acctually the Spitfire had better manuver capabilities than the BF109. And acctually we had less casualties that what the Germans had. The Hurricane was more of a Bomber killer, Spitfire more a BF109 killer.

  • Um... No. Hitler was an idiot and that is why the allies won (Also they had the huge support of russian troops). In fact, the only thing britain did right in that war was pushing the germans out of the middle east, which they later lost due to the german-influenced-and-funded extremist groups.

  • @gishkiman

    I really couldn't give a shit on what people say about "Who won the war," and "Oh Britian did fuck all", all I care about is that I live in a bloody free world because of the Americans, Britain, the Allies and Russia having had won the war. If you want to moan about the war, moan to the people who fought in it if your feeling that cocky about it.

  • I'm not moaning about the war, I am clarifying the details. The war was necessary and I am not disrespecting the people who fought in it. The allied cmanders made mistakes, the soldiers just followed them.

    Such as, I think the war in the middleeast is pointless and a waste of lives and resources. I don't mean disrespect to the people fighting in there, but more to those who command them to stay.

  • @gishkiman

    Ah ok dude. If you would of said commanders in the first place then I would of understood more :D

  • @BOT101st Hitler invaded Russia to impress Britain as Churchill had turned down Hitlers offer of Britain keeps India, Germany takes Europe.

  • @egzy101

    In english please?

    Hitler invaded russia because he couldn't go through with operation sealion because he knew it wouldn't succeed. Hitler had some ties with Britain and they NEARLY became allies before the beggining of the war (Chamberlain and Hitler treaty shizzle)

    But yeah I know what you mean.

  • Even Germany and the Soviets together could not have defeated the USA on our own soil.

  • @t239 Why would anyone attack USA? You cant even abuse their woman becuase you would just get a tramatic experience yourself at the first look at them. Just farmers and Hamburgersbars.

  • Comment removed

  • Yeah, right. MY OWN FATHERLAND'S MEN FIGHT AGGENST THAT GODDAM RUSSIA AND/OR SOVIET RUSSIA! GREETINGS FROM FINLAND AND FUCK RUSSIA!

  • thank god for russia :)

    you saved our asses in ww2 not the usa

    americans are just glory hunters, they are not true allies, russians would be better allies.

    greetings from england.

  • hm actually russia had plans to overwin europe for its own out of revenge they didnt wanted to help us they just wanted revenge cuz germany and russia where allies in 1939 they both attacked Poland and then hitler desided to attack stalingrad and thats why russia wanted revenge...... they didnt save us they never did.....

  • yawn, well i think they did, they reached berlin first, after having there land ravished and there women raped, did that happen to america, no. and i find it extremely annoying how americans think they fought the japs on there own. the british came from india to attack the japs in china, burma etc. you fought on some pacific islands we fought along mainland asia. the anzac forces also fought hard in png.

    and after we did you took the credit and blankes us out, bastards.

  • And the Soviets never gave up never surendered they faught with or with out weapons they still never gave up they faught there hearts out and they werent afraid of death!

  • of course they were afraid of death, had no choice.

    1. retreat = killed by your own side.

    2. pow = killed by germans or your own troops (that considered you a traitor)

    So only hope to stay alive is to keep on fighting to the end, and try to win at all costs.

  • the Germans were good cause they had the SS but the Japenese killed most of our men because they were taking and torcherd and my grandpa said it was brutal!

  • My grandfather was in the army at the korean war and ww2 4 tours but he came back the meanest man around but he was awesome

  • this video is great~!!!!!!! song matches it 2

  • god bless thoes troops

  • How i can see wold war 2 in movie in youtube

  • type omaha beach

  • Heres how I view the war.

    British Resolve inspired us all

    The Soviets took the bulk of the casulaities

    The USA paid the bills

  • How the war actually went:

    Soviet killed the wemacht.

    The British held their ground.

    USA had a minor role.

  • are you kidding me?? you must have been educated under the USSR if you believe that. The united states gave the soviet union the most food out of anyone. Without the lend lease the USSR would have been utterly destroyed. Saying the US had a minor role shows your ignorance of history.

  • I wouldnt say that the USA had a minor role. The western offensive wouldnt be possible without them.

    What is true is that the Soviets did the most to defeat nazi germany.

    Consideruing that the germans never had over 55 div at one time in the west, while they had 157 div. on the eastern front, who recived the major amount of new weapons and little reinforcements. Going to the western front usualy was considered a blessing to rebuild partialy destroyed units from the eastern front.

  • The germans also had about 25 div. in Italy which can be added to the 55 mentioned before. So imagine facing all those divs + weapons + all there losses during the eastern front. the war would have been very much longer.

  • USSSR killed many of there own ppl to and made them fight. no telling how many were killed bythere own bullets

  • only footage of american

    boring!!!

  • not only,its like 2 maybe 3 other nations :D

  • too bad the Fuhrer did not win.

    88

  • yeah..

  • germany had easily the coolest army of world war two, with their severe feld-grau uniforms and sharp helmets. then came the americans with their laid back baggy fatigues. after then the British with more practical uniforms and cool helmets, after them the Japs and finally the french.

  • The Germans certainly had great camo, but the uniforms I like best were American

    m1942s

  • 2bh the Germans had the most Modern army of the second world war, and that was definitly demostrated with their troops uniform and equipment, which was better than that of the Americans and British and Japanese, though perhaps a little behind considering the americans M1Garand and British Lee Enfields (the best rifles of their era's)

    but i like german camo, and the style of their uniforms which are closer to modern kit than any other army of the period.

  • fucking nazi, you didn't learn a thing in the shcool! haven't you?

  • view my army video

  • We are not polish,we are ukrainian.And Russia wins WW2!

  • not :P

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more