During the final stages of World War II in 1945, the United States conducted two atomic bombings against the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, the first on August 6, 1945, and the second on August 9, 1945. These two events are the ONLY use of nuclear weapons in war to date.
maybe scott ritter would like to tell us all how to deal with terrorist , i just find it funny how libs are always attacking bush on the way he deals with terrorist but yet they never have a plan
look up Ron Paul if you want a "lib" to tell you how to deal with terrorists. The fact of the matter is that this is a guerilla war, to such a large degree that standard military operations will not defeat this enemy.
Anybody watching the government long enough knows that this war has little to do with our saftey, and everything to do with scaring the world into submission. Think every Al-Qaeda will raise his hand and let the US take them away? No. New gameplan please
whats up with conservatives being pussies all of the sudden? iran wouldn't stand a goddamn chance. fat ass republicans send out soldiers like me to take care of them so they can count their money, and grow dumber and more bigoted. i've never seen such cowardice, ignorance, and carelessness in american's as the right wing has shown these past 8 years. rep. need to grow some balls and stop worrying about every little thing that happens in the world and start worrying about things back home.
Question to Bill: "Do you think we're winning in Iraq?" Bill's stupid answer: "I don't know, I know we're not losing" (!!!?). WE'RE NOT!? Over 4,000 dead (and counting) AFTER Bush's bullshit publicity prank on board the carrier standing in front of a giant 'MISSION ACCOMPLISHED' SIGN!? We have to PAY the combatants NOT TO FIGHT in order to avert civil war! And THIS is the douche-bag the boobus American public get their "news" from!
youtube search 'blackwater' then 'halliburton commercial' then 'kbr water', then google 'private soldiers pbs' and 'U.S. Troops in Iraq being Electrocuted by Halliburton'
then youtube 'ISRAEL is NOT WORTH A SINGLE AMERICAN LIFE OR DOLLAR', then 'hillary aipac', then google video 'aipac'
im so fed up with all the mainstream media. i use to hate it but also thought it was funny... now i cant take it. its ruining this country and its sad b/c it seems that you cant stop it.
You'll notice that O'Reilly won't go head to head with Ritter. In fact, NONE of the neo-con political shows (Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.), or ANY pro-war show or periodical will take on Ritter one on one because they know he will shred their arguments and biases. All they can hope for is to smear Ritter in some fashion, which they have already tried and failed.
Why does the "right" or the"conservatives" always like to put everyone in a category and why is compassion towards another race of people seen as a negative?
Andy WHY do they want to "kill us"!? Have you read ANY of Ritter's reports? Do you understand ANYTHING about what is going on both in this country and abroad? And, who's "killing" who? What country has invaded and is now occupying WHO!? Whose people are being slaughtered RIGHT NOW!? You REALLY need to educate yourself and stop being just another neo-con war apologist spewing sound-bites.
They want to kill us because of their religion. It has nothing to do with "us". They have been trying for over 1400 years to kill the West. You are an apologist for them and I suggest you stop attempting to justify 9/11 and other atrocities. It is pathetic. YOU need to educate yourself.
You are INSANE! You just spouted another neo-con sound bite ("their religion is to blame, no US!"). How pathetic! If the US is already in THEIR country, killing THEIR people, wiping out THEIR industry and infrastructure, how in God's name are THEY going to "KILL US"!? That's not making "apologies" for anyone, dufuss. Let's hear your grand scheme for an Islamic invasion!
Wow, you are truly deluded. It is the terrorists/insurgents that are killing people civilians- not the US military. Get that through your thick skull. It is obvious you have no grasp on history whatsoever.
By "insurgents/terrorists" you mean Iraqi Freedom Fighters, right!? The reality is that if American troops were not in Iraq then all this slaughter would not be taking place. Again, you dodge the question. How will Islam mount an invasion of America?
So you would rather live under hussein? You would actually like that? Well I guess you and him could have ridden around in cars and joked as 100s of thousands were being executed in front of you. Then you could have been sodomized by him- muslim style and his elite guards since you like him soooo much. You dodge my question again as usual.
Are you coherant!? How do you figure I would want to "live under Hussein"? How on earth did you come to that conclusion? I've "dodged" your question"!? Was there really a "question" somewhere in all this gibberish? You're not making any sense. You sound like John McCain. What is your problem?
Actually, if I had my choice between Hussein and what we have now, A Resounding YES! At least Hussein kept the religious clerics at bay. Now, even pro US Iraqis say Iraq is WORSE as a result of the invasion.
That is quite possible but ONLY if the US unleashes the nuclear genie. At that point the entire Arab world will be gunning for us and, yes, it's possible (probable)that one of our cities will be taken out in retaliation. However, that is RETALIATION, not some neo-con inspired nightmare about some non-existant ability of Islam to invade us.
They want nukes for power generation so their people can enjoy the same luxuries you do like hot water, a hot meal etc available to more people within the populace.
Religious fundamentalism and terrorism are bred in extreme poverty where those simple day to day items are not available.
uh here we go again jizzmonger. blame it all on the poverty right? So if I get you "logic" then if I were poor I would be allowed to rape and pillage a village correct? Wow scary logic there bud!
This is why people like you are kept powerless by the system.
We can't have someone with logic as horrible as yours in a position where important decisions have to be made...especially not ones concerning foreign policy.
Actually I thought libs hated the system. ya know, it kept the little guy down kind of bull shit we hear from failures like yourself. You can't defend your logic so you went on about 'the system'. roflmao!
Actually, if you really knew what you were talking about (which you don't) you'd realize the Democrats are right in there with the neo-Con warmongers. The Democrats, led by both Hillary and Obama, have betrayed the anti-war movement. Also, by "exremists" you mean like extreme militarist, warmongering John McCain, right?
Betrayed the "anti-war movement". Wow what a crime. Do you mean the anti-war movement that was willing to sell out to the Soviets and do anything to help the north Vietnamese?
Once again, we had an illegal war that we never should have been in. The Soviets were already neck deep into Vietnam anyway. And what has been the outcome of that war which cost over 58,000 US dead 304,700 wounded and over 3,000 mia/cia?
What did we have as an outcome of that war? Well, lets see. Oh yes, millions dead and 700,000 south vietnamese had to go to re-education camps. Thanks you American left! It is resoundingly clear that you hate freedom.
Well, see, I don't give a shit about the Vietnamese. I care about AMERICANS! 58,000 dead, 304,700 wounded, and over 3,000 mia/cia is not worth a million Vietnamese. A BILLION Vietnames!
Well you show your true colours. You have also shown that you are out of steam and have no arguments left that are sufficient to counter my otherwise stellar argument. Game. Set. Match.
Who is "our" side, dunce? Did you even watch this video? If so, did you happen to listen to what Scott Ritter said? If HE can't convince you then no one can. And, btw, Ritter - Like Me - is a card carrying REPUBLICAN, not a "Leftist," you idiot!
You are nothing but a shill for the warmongering military industrial complex which is tearing this nation apart. I hope you're happy about that, you sorry fuck!
Perhaps you should actually READ the constitution. Then maybe people like you would not be given any credence. And here we go again with the "military industrial complex" BS. *sigh*. Why must everything in this country come down to conspiracy theorists nutjobs...?
I know the Constitution backwards and forwards, but apparently you don't. There's no "conspiracy" about the Military Industrial Complex since that term is a commonly used term to describe exactly what it is. You need to get your head out of Fox News' ass.
what is conspiratorial about the fact that america has military bases in over 100 countires areound the world? Is that not a military complex? Is the military not provided with infastructure through industrial corporations? Thus they have the same intrests? Is the military not bankrolled from tax dollars? Im sorry, but you are a nut job if you cant put 2 and 2 together, and turn around and call it a conspiracy theory. WAKE UP!
Tell me, why do you have a problem with making money? Really, why? What is up your ass? I find the conspiracy is that you think it is a bad thing out to get you.
Please,thats not what you meant when you said conspiracy initially, so dont try to twist it now. Now that i've demonstrated that its not a conspiracy, ill answer your questions. I didnt say anything is out to get me. I dont have a problem with making money. Im LOSING money to fund the military industrial complex. Also we spend 177million dollars PER DAY, to fight the Iraq war. Guess who is paying for that? Even Mitt Romney stated that 20% of tax money goes to the military, and thats pre-iraq.
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
You cant properly interpret facts. Understand this: taxes are a part of GDP. How much of our tax dollars go towards the military? answer: 20% SO my point still stands. Also ask yourself this: Who's getting rich off the war? Not to mention that the war is ILLEGAL both as mandated by international law and if you look at the reasons for going into Iraq, also illegal under our own constitution. Also, blind partisanship(which you embrace leads to nothing except closed minded people like yourself.
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
You cant properly interpret facts. Understand this: taxes are a part of GDP. How much of our tax dollars go towards the military? answer: 20% SO my point still stands. Also ask yourself this: Who's getting rich off the war? Not to mention that the war is ILLEGAL both as mandated by international law and if you look at the reasons for going into Iraq, also illegal under our own constitution. Also, blind partisanship(which you embrace leads to nothing except closed minded people like yourself
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
My point stands. 20% of our tax dollars go to fund the military. Which is more in context of our conversation than your total GDP fact. I think you know I have a point so you are trying to divert the attention from that by reposting the same fact over and over, instead of engaging in an intellegent discussion. In other words you know Im right, so now you are covering your ears, closing your eyes and chanting something that makes you feel comfortable. Way to act like a stubborn child!
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
20% of our tax dollars support the military, which has a more direct impact on citizens than does the total spending of GDP on the military. is that too hard for you to understand? LESS of our tax dollar are spent on education. I guess you dont understand the difference between GDP and TAXES. You see how stupid you look now? Your like a mini-replica of the bush administration "stay the course stay the course stay the course stay the course" except your is on gdp. 20% of TAXES = MILITARY
youtube search 'blackwater' then 'halliburton commercial' then 'kbr water', then google 'private soldiers pbs' and 'U.S. Troops in Iraq being Electrocuted by Halliburton'
then youtube 'ISRAEL is NOT WORTH A SINGLE AMERICAN LIFE OR DOLLAR', then 'hillary aipac', then google video 'aipac'
Iran will not use nuclear and they prooved to be honourable fighters in the 1981 western backed war against them. Western chemical weaponswere used against thier soldirs and 50 000 plus soldires dies from that but they didnt respond with chemical eventhough they had the technology. USA prooved to be dirty in hirosheema. Irans supreme leader prohibits the creation of nuclear as a weapon.
America Does not need to get in a war by ourselves to invade Iran. If Iran armed itself and was becoming a nuclear nation with terroistic intent, the UN would intervene with a Coalition of troops. Why does AMERICA have to take on the WORLD.
captaincherios go eat ur cereals...wat r u talking about....u must not have left ur home town bc incase u dont know...not only do the middle east or asia not like the US (forign policy) but europe, South America do not aprrove of the US either. Look at anyone who travels and puts a flag on their bags its always a dual flag of US and canada...u know why????
If GWB goes to war with iran everyone might as well say hello to nuclear fallout. Iran isn't afraid to use nukes on us. The Iranian president is a hardliner. GWB needs to stfu already.
......That's inhumane and unethical, and it cannot be justified by religion. And if you want to compare that to the United States in Iraq and set aside the tyranny Hussein brought about for I think it's 30 years to the Iraqi people then I can safely say you are liberal with no fucking balls.
Iran is under a propagandist media. Kill the jews. Kill America. It's as clear as black and white. And if you think a sovereign nation like ourselves doesn't have the descency to keep to ourselves from using military diplomacy and Iran does then you need to read up on history. Move to Canada. Maybe France. And on the notion that O'reilly compares the Iran regime,(not Ahmananandadjd) but the underlying regime in charge to children is a logical one. Kill the blood of the jews in the name of Allah?
Kill the muslims their all terrorists.Who installed saddam,and who gave him wmd to use on iranians,who installed the shah,iranians have every right to hate americans,americans have no right to hate iranians.
ehh? me sayn "Kill the muslims their all terrorists." is an example of the american propaganda.Americans need to back off,they cant fix problems,only create more.
this liz pinhead really shows the ignorance of the left. we need to defend our freedom and stop a psycho killer like the president of Iran. this other liberal idiot that speaks at the end of the video really shows that the liberals have no guts and don't even know that these Islamic terrorists have already attacked one of our cities, and that giving them a nuclear weapon will increase the death count.
At this point with the Bush administration, I trust Iran more not to use Nuclear Weapons than the US. You seem to become more and more scared and radical...
Misguided fools like your self also trusted Hitler and millions lost there life as a result. I am proud to live in the land that allows for free dialog and the land that has liberated more counties from oppression then any other in the history of man kind. A land where a woman is free of being stoned, beheaded, or beaten and has the same rights as man a land where all minorities are treated with respect and tolerance a land that has spilt young blood to stop homicidal maniacs such as your leader
This really shows the downward spiral of thinking involved with "going to war" Sadly, I think what Bill says about the democratic party is coming out to be true, most of them ARE pro-war, and its because they are sellouts. They don't care bout saying what's right or standing up for what needs to be done. They are worried about SPIN and elections.
This guy was right before Iraq and was shunned....I wonder if we are going to ignore him again. Then you will have Billy sayinq we gotta stay the course in Iran also and maybe even Nuke it to protect our boys...and it will never end.
During the final stages of World War II in 1945, the United States conducted two atomic bombings against the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, the first on August 6, 1945, and the second on August 9, 1945. These two events are the ONLY use of nuclear weapons in war to date.
AltijdOnderInvloedSh 2 months ago
maybe scott ritter would like to tell us all how to deal with terrorist , i just find it funny how libs are always attacking bush on the way he deals with terrorist but yet they never have a plan
cocobear33 2 years ago
@cocobear33
look up Ron Paul if you want a "lib" to tell you how to deal with terrorists. The fact of the matter is that this is a guerilla war, to such a large degree that standard military operations will not defeat this enemy.
Anybody watching the government long enough knows that this war has little to do with our saftey, and everything to do with scaring the world into submission. Think every Al-Qaeda will raise his hand and let the US take them away? No. New gameplan please
HairLikeCottonCandy 2 years ago
omfg, what a word twisting little dick bill is... fucking christ this asshole should jump of a bridge
VenusDoom3 2 years ago
whats up with conservatives being pussies all of the sudden? iran wouldn't stand a goddamn chance. fat ass republicans send out soldiers like me to take care of them so they can count their money, and grow dumber and more bigoted. i've never seen such cowardice, ignorance, and carelessness in american's as the right wing has shown these past 8 years. rep. need to grow some balls and stop worrying about every little thing that happens in the world and start worrying about things back home.
bickybocky 3 years ago
Scott Ritter OWNS chickenhawk O'Reilly.
OneCounterfeitSoul 3 years ago 3
Scott Ritter rocks. He reminds me of Ron Paul
mohimohi1983 3 years ago 7
Awesome, that's what I call in you face big bully.
I love when people face these Fox news bullies and answer his false choice questions straight.
The purpose of these questions is to intimidate the person into not given a straight answer.
An example would be:
Bill, what to you like More a bathe with Luhfas or a buffet of Falafel?
JerezJulio 3 years ago
Question to Bill: "Do you think we're winning in Iraq?" Bill's stupid answer: "I don't know, I know we're not losing" (!!!?). WE'RE NOT!? Over 4,000 dead (and counting) AFTER Bush's bullshit publicity prank on board the carrier standing in front of a giant 'MISSION ACCOMPLISHED' SIGN!? We have to PAY the combatants NOT TO FIGHT in order to avert civil war! And THIS is the douche-bag the boobus American public get their "news" from!
1factoid 3 years ago
why have I never seen this clip of oreilly?
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
O'really is a fucking moron , somebody shoot him.
Renrussian 3 years ago
youtube search 'blackwater' then 'halliburton commercial' then 'kbr water', then google 'private soldiers pbs' and 'U.S. Troops in Iraq being Electrocuted by Halliburton'
then youtube 'ISRAEL is NOT WORTH A SINGLE AMERICAN LIFE OR DOLLAR', then 'hillary aipac', then google video 'aipac'
google 'iran china oil' they're allies!
hggh22 3 years ago
oreilly is a joke, he calls himself a warrior, youtube 'culture warrior bill oreilly'
hggh22 3 years ago 2
im so fed up with all the mainstream media. i use to hate it but also thought it was funny... now i cant take it. its ruining this country and its sad b/c it seems that you cant stop it.
rockaction9 4 years ago
You'll notice that O'Reilly won't go head to head with Ritter. In fact, NONE of the neo-con political shows (Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.), or ANY pro-war show or periodical will take on Ritter one on one because they know he will shred their arguments and biases. All they can hope for is to smear Ritter in some fashion, which they have already tried and failed.
1factoid 4 years ago
If USA acts they lose a city. If they don't act they lose a city.
kjogar 4 years ago
I like Ron Paul's non-interventionists approach.
And no, it is not to be confused with isolationism.
InTheSticks1881 4 years ago
So Liberals don't care if the US is is any danger. But they do care if the iran is... wow they are more idiotic than I thought possible.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Why does the "right" or the"conservatives" always like to put everyone in a category and why is compassion towards another race of people seen as a negative?
AngryAgain 4 years ago
Compassion towards another race is fine but libe are compassionate to the ones that want to kill us!
Northgrant 4 years ago
Andy WHY do they want to "kill us"!? Have you read ANY of Ritter's reports? Do you understand ANYTHING about what is going on both in this country and abroad? And, who's "killing" who? What country has invaded and is now occupying WHO!? Whose people are being slaughtered RIGHT NOW!? You REALLY need to educate yourself and stop being just another neo-con war apologist spewing sound-bites.
1factoid 4 years ago
They want to kill us because of their religion. It has nothing to do with "us". They have been trying for over 1400 years to kill the West. You are an apologist for them and I suggest you stop attempting to justify 9/11 and other atrocities. It is pathetic. YOU need to educate yourself.
Northgrant 4 years ago
You are INSANE! You just spouted another neo-con sound bite ("their religion is to blame, no US!"). How pathetic! If the US is already in THEIR country, killing THEIR people, wiping out THEIR industry and infrastructure, how in God's name are THEY going to "KILL US"!? That's not making "apologies" for anyone, dufuss. Let's hear your grand scheme for an Islamic invasion!
1factoid 4 years ago
Wow, you are truly deluded. It is the terrorists/insurgents that are killing people civilians- not the US military. Get that through your thick skull. It is obvious you have no grasp on history whatsoever.
Northgrant 4 years ago
By "insurgents/terrorists" you mean Iraqi Freedom Fighters, right!? The reality is that if American troops were not in Iraq then all this slaughter would not be taking place. Again, you dodge the question. How will Islam mount an invasion of America?
1factoid 4 years ago
So you would rather live under hussein? You would actually like that? Well I guess you and him could have ridden around in cars and joked as 100s of thousands were being executed in front of you. Then you could have been sodomized by him- muslim style and his elite guards since you like him soooo much. You dodge my question again as usual.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Are you coherant!? How do you figure I would want to "live under Hussein"? How on earth did you come to that conclusion? I've "dodged" your question"!? Was there really a "question" somewhere in all this gibberish? You're not making any sense. You sound like John McCain. What is your problem?
1factoid 4 years ago
You would rather hussein be in control. That's how I came to my coherent, clear conclusion.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Actually, if I had my choice between Hussein and what we have now, A Resounding YES! At least Hussein kept the religious clerics at bay. Now, even pro US Iraqis say Iraq is WORSE as a result of the invasion.
1factoid 4 years ago
Northgrant didnt listen, the guy expresses concern that an american city will be destroyed if americans unleash nuclear war...
TranceDevotee 4 years ago
That is quite possible but ONLY if the US unleashes the nuclear genie. At that point the entire Arab world will be gunning for us and, yes, it's possible (probable)that one of our cities will be taken out in retaliation. However, that is RETALIATION, not some neo-con inspired nightmare about some non-existant ability of Islam to invade us.
1factoid 4 years ago
Iran has been proven a non-threat.
They want nukes for power generation so their people can enjoy the same luxuries you do like hot water, a hot meal etc available to more people within the populace.
Religious fundamentalism and terrorism are bred in extreme poverty where those simple day to day items are not available.
jizzmonger 4 years ago
uh here we go again jizzmonger. blame it all on the poverty right? So if I get you "logic" then if I were poor I would be allowed to rape and pillage a village correct? Wow scary logic there bud!
Northgrant 4 years ago
This is why people like you are kept powerless by the system.
We can't have someone with logic as horrible as yours in a position where important decisions have to be made...especially not ones concerning foreign policy.
jizzmonger 4 years ago
Actually I thought libs hated the system. ya know, it kept the little guy down kind of bull shit we hear from failures like yourself. You can't defend your logic so you went on about 'the system'. roflmao!
Northgrant 4 years ago
I believe in the system because I see how it keeps people like you out of power.
It's a wonderful system if it marginalizes people like yourself.
jizzmonger 4 years ago
I like the system more because it keeps dems and extremists out like yourself.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Your best reply was merely copying me.
LOL
jizzmonger 4 years ago
...
Northgrant 4 years ago
Actually, if you really knew what you were talking about (which you don't) you'd realize the Democrats are right in there with the neo-Con warmongers. The Democrats, led by both Hillary and Obama, have betrayed the anti-war movement. Also, by "exremists" you mean like extreme militarist, warmongering John McCain, right?
1factoid 4 years ago
Betrayed the "anti-war movement". Wow what a crime. Do you mean the anti-war movement that was willing to sell out to the Soviets and do anything to help the north Vietnamese?
Northgrant 4 years ago
Once again, we had an illegal war that we never should have been in. The Soviets were already neck deep into Vietnam anyway. And what has been the outcome of that war which cost over 58,000 US dead 304,700 wounded and over 3,000 mia/cia?
1factoid 4 years ago
What did we have as an outcome of that war? Well, lets see. Oh yes, millions dead and 700,000 south vietnamese had to go to re-education camps. Thanks you American left! It is resoundingly clear that you hate freedom.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Well, see, I don't give a shit about the Vietnamese. I care about AMERICANS! 58,000 dead, 304,700 wounded, and over 3,000 mia/cia is not worth a million Vietnamese. A BILLION Vietnames!
1factoid 4 years ago
Well you show your true colours. You have also shown that you are out of steam and have no arguments left that are sufficient to counter my otherwise stellar argument. Game. Set. Match.
Northgrant 4 years ago
God, what an idiot. I'm SO glad your not on our side. Let whoever the hell you're for have you, with my blessing.
1factoid 4 years ago
Our side is winning. HAHAHA how's it feel to have someone questioning the left? You arguments crumble like old cheese.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Who is "our" side, dunce? Did you even watch this video? If so, did you happen to listen to what Scott Ritter said? If HE can't convince you then no one can. And, btw, Ritter - Like Me - is a card carrying REPUBLICAN, not a "Leftist," you idiot!
1factoid 4 years ago
Hey, you're the one who brought up "sides". I merely ran with it. I called your bluff.
Northgrant 4 years ago
You are nothing but a shill for the warmongering military industrial complex which is tearing this nation apart. I hope you're happy about that, you sorry fuck!
1factoid 4 years ago
"Game, set, match"!!!? What part of "ILLEGAL"OR "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND!? "Game, set, match," MY ASS!
1factoid 4 years ago
Perhaps you should actually READ the constitution. Then maybe people like you would not be given any credence. And here we go again with the "military industrial complex" BS. *sigh*. Why must everything in this country come down to conspiracy theorists nutjobs...?
Northgrant 4 years ago
I know the Constitution backwards and forwards, but apparently you don't. There's no "conspiracy" about the Military Industrial Complex since that term is a commonly used term to describe exactly what it is. You need to get your head out of Fox News' ass.
1factoid 4 years ago
commonly? So that denotes truth? I hear rosie o'donnell a lot. Does that mean what she says is true?
Northgrant 4 years ago
what is conspiratorial about the fact that america has military bases in over 100 countires areound the world? Is that not a military complex? Is the military not provided with infastructure through industrial corporations? Thus they have the same intrests? Is the military not bankrolled from tax dollars? Im sorry, but you are a nut job if you cant put 2 and 2 together, and turn around and call it a conspiracy theory. WAKE UP!
lufo530 4 years ago
Tell me, why do you have a problem with making money? Really, why? What is up your ass? I find the conspiracy is that you think it is a bad thing out to get you.
Northgrant 4 years ago
Please,thats not what you meant when you said conspiracy initially, so dont try to twist it now. Now that i've demonstrated that its not a conspiracy, ill answer your questions. I didnt say anything is out to get me. I dont have a problem with making money. Im LOSING money to fund the military industrial complex. Also we spend 177million dollars PER DAY, to fight the Iraq war. Guess who is paying for that? Even Mitt Romney stated that 20% of tax money goes to the military, and thats pre-iraq.
lufo530 3 years ago
One simple indisputable fact
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
Northgrant 3 years ago
You cant properly interpret facts. Understand this: taxes are a part of GDP. How much of our tax dollars go towards the military? answer: 20% SO my point still stands. Also ask yourself this: Who's getting rich off the war? Not to mention that the war is ILLEGAL both as mandated by international law and if you look at the reasons for going into Iraq, also illegal under our own constitution. Also, blind partisanship(which you embrace leads to nothing except closed minded people like yourself.
lufo530 3 years ago
One simple indisputable fact
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
Northgrant 3 years ago
You cant properly interpret facts. Understand this: taxes are a part of GDP. How much of our tax dollars go towards the military? answer: 20% SO my point still stands. Also ask yourself this: Who's getting rich off the war? Not to mention that the war is ILLEGAL both as mandated by international law and if you look at the reasons for going into Iraq, also illegal under our own constitution. Also, blind partisanship(which you embrace leads to nothing except closed minded people like yourself
lufo530 3 years ago
One simple indisputable fact
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
Northgrant 3 years ago
My point stands. 20% of our tax dollars go to fund the military. Which is more in context of our conversation than your total GDP fact. I think you know I have a point so you are trying to divert the attention from that by reposting the same fact over and over, instead of engaging in an intellegent discussion. In other words you know Im right, so now you are covering your ears, closing your eyes and chanting something that makes you feel comfortable. Way to act like a stubborn child!
lufo530 3 years ago
One simple indisputable fact
4% of GDP goes to the war. That is all. More is spent on education. And yet Americans become even more dumb (the ones who vote democrat for those with slow cognitive skills and such).
Northgrant 3 years ago
20% of our tax dollars support the military, which has a more direct impact on citizens than does the total spending of GDP on the military. is that too hard for you to understand? LESS of our tax dollar are spent on education. I guess you dont understand the difference between GDP and TAXES. You see how stupid you look now? Your like a mini-replica of the bush administration "stay the course stay the course stay the course stay the course" except your is on gdp. 20% of TAXES = MILITARY
lufo530 3 years ago
youtube search 'blackwater' then 'halliburton commercial' then 'kbr water', then google 'private soldiers pbs' and 'U.S. Troops in Iraq being Electrocuted by Halliburton'
then youtube 'ISRAEL is NOT WORTH A SINGLE AMERICAN LIFE OR DOLLAR', then 'hillary aipac', then google video 'aipac'
google 'iran china oil' they're allies!
hggh22 3 years ago
I have a question. Do you own a tin hat, or a collection of tin hats? What is your favourite tin hat to wear?
Northgrant 3 years ago
Iran will not use nuclear and they prooved to be honourable fighters in the 1981 western backed war against them. Western chemical weaponswere used against thier soldirs and 50 000 plus soldires dies from that but they didnt respond with chemical eventhough they had the technology. USA prooved to be dirty in hirosheema. Irans supreme leader prohibits the creation of nuclear as a weapon.
shorty40merza 4 years ago 2
were not losing it!!!...ppl r losing their lives....Bill "Kangis Khan" Oreilly
fsem10 4 years ago
America Does not need to get in a war by ourselves to invade Iran. If Iran armed itself and was becoming a nuclear nation with terroistic intent, the UN would intervene with a Coalition of troops. Why does AMERICA have to take on the WORLD.
captaincheerios 4 years ago
captaincherios go eat ur cereals...wat r u talking about....u must not have left ur home town bc incase u dont know...not only do the middle east or asia not like the US (forign policy) but europe, South America do not aprrove of the US either. Look at anyone who travels and puts a flag on their bags its always a dual flag of US and canada...u know why????
fsem10 4 years ago
If GWB goes to war with iran everyone might as well say hello to nuclear fallout. Iran isn't afraid to use nukes on us. The Iranian president is a hardliner. GWB needs to stfu already.
DMNKsTWIN 4 years ago
......That's inhumane and unethical, and it cannot be justified by religion. And if you want to compare that to the United States in Iraq and set aside the tyranny Hussein brought about for I think it's 30 years to the Iraqi people then I can safely say you are liberal with no fucking balls.
WebbA7X 4 years ago 2
could not have said it better my self!!!
0Hermes00 4 years ago
Iran is under a propagandist media. Kill the jews. Kill America. It's as clear as black and white. And if you think a sovereign nation like ourselves doesn't have the descency to keep to ourselves from using military diplomacy and Iran does then you need to read up on history. Move to Canada. Maybe France. And on the notion that O'reilly compares the Iran regime,(not Ahmananandadjd) but the underlying regime in charge to children is a logical one. Kill the blood of the jews in the name of Allah?
WebbA7X 4 years ago
And you are under the propagandist media.
Kill the muslims their all terrorists.Who installed saddam,and who gave him wmd to use on iranians,who installed the shah,iranians have every right to hate americans,americans have no right to hate iranians.
colmmernagh 4 years ago
Ha ha.
Our interference created the problem so more interference should fix the problem.
If a little screw things up then more should make them right. LOL
jizzmonger 4 years ago
ehh? me sayn "Kill the muslims their all terrorists." is an example of the american propaganda.Americans need to back off,they cant fix problems,only create more.
colmmernagh 4 years ago
this liz pinhead really shows the ignorance of the left. we need to defend our freedom and stop a psycho killer like the president of Iran. this other liberal idiot that speaks at the end of the video really shows that the liberals have no guts and don't even know that these Islamic terrorists have already attacked one of our cities, and that giving them a nuclear weapon will increase the death count.
hermesgoes 4 years ago
At this point with the Bush administration, I trust Iran more not to use Nuclear Weapons than the US. You seem to become more and more scared and radical...
And you've actually done it before... TWICE
simras1234 4 years ago
Misguided fools like your self also trusted Hitler and millions lost there life as a result. I am proud to live in the land that allows for free dialog and the land that has liberated more counties from oppression then any other in the history of man kind. A land where a woman is free of being stoned, beheaded, or beaten and has the same rights as man a land where all minorities are treated with respect and tolerance a land that has spilt young blood to stop homicidal maniacs such as your leader
hhhhvfrvfrvfr 4 years ago
Excellent Video mon
Jimraynor45 4 years ago
George Bush and his admistration is EVIL,,,
Go to Hell for all Bush supporters...
tvtechwonV 4 years ago
O'Reilly is so sleazy. "if Iran keeps misbehaving". Children misbehave.
CrazedLeper 4 years ago
your an idiot, take a cold shower, and relax
0Hermes00 4 years ago
This really shows the downward spiral of thinking involved with "going to war" Sadly, I think what Bill says about the democratic party is coming out to be true, most of them ARE pro-war, and its because they are sellouts. They don't care bout saying what's right or standing up for what needs to be done. They are worried about SPIN and elections.
alysseumwarrior 4 years ago
This guy was right before Iraq and was shunned....I wonder if we are going to ignore him again. Then you will have Billy sayinq we gotta stay the course in Iran also and maybe even Nuke it to protect our boys...and it will never end.
DelinquentFaith 4 years ago
good point ! Couldnt have said it better..whos is this guy ?
thiravia 4 years ago
Iran 'missbehaves' and must therefore be attacked? No comments... Iran develops a nuclear weapon? Even less comments...
germanicus24 4 years ago