Added: 5 years ago
From: webidiotbox
Views: 2,180,902
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,379)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • still good video

  • i made a enterprise with lights and what star ship is that it look like the enterprise c when it should be a enterprise d plus mine looks cooler

  • star wars hell yer

  • Star Wars!

  • Thumbs up if starwars is better than star trek

  • Kirk doesn't deserve to say Piett's lines. Snubfighters ftw.

  • like yhe words of Han solo YAHOOOOOO

  • hell yeah!!!

  • STAR TREK HATER

  • Well, now we know it's impossible to have the force be with you, and not live long and prosper at the same time.

  • did u see kirks head fall of at 2:46

  • WOW. ST Shps have WAY better aim than that. No way is it even close.... ST Ship was full of imposters anyway.

  • The 3 X-Wings and 1 A-Wing pwned

  • Incorrect; by the first season of TNG the typical crew compliment was 1,014. By later seasons it was very hard to estimate the number of acting crew members because many served on the Enterprise D and later left to serve on other vessels.

  • 1,118 peopl were on the enterprise

  • now, if it were voyager...

  • Yes in your face star trek nerds! Star Wars rules forever!

  • how the hell does star wars win! >:(

  • Like if watched in 2012!!!!!!!!!!

  • Great!!!!! Love the face, you've got to get Dan Miga or whoever it was to make more like this

  • 2:08 The single most epic rage face ever. RRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH

  • IM HITTTTT!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! BAM!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

  • F star wars star trek beater 45 years

  • the enterprise is always sopose to win

    

  • OH MY GOSH!

  • The USS teapot.

  • Love this. xD

  • LAME!

    

  • WTF UR GUYS HAVE DIFFERENT UNIFORMS ON FUCK U.

  • the empire may not beat the federation but the rebles might.

  • Star Wars=Star Trek Let us all be friends they are both incredible.

  • Enterprise Stupiddddddddddddddd !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • If that's Picard? why the hair? o.O

  • @DCdabest Actually that was a mash-up of TOS and TNG crews, the captain is Kirk. The other ones are Chekov, Scotty (TOS), Data, Troi (I'd guess) and Riker (TNG).

  • @IndianaCat94 meaning that he just killed all the good charactors from both shows

  • star wars rules,man!

  • WTF star trek should have won

  • and star wars ships are slow .6 past lightspeed, or warp 1.6 is the fastest i have heard a star wars ship go

  • ok first off star trek has lasers but they only effect the shields by less then 1% and second @1065chris star wars frequency's are too slow to be picked up by standard instramints

  • AWESOME!!

  • Good guys vs Good guys is STUPID!!! The Enterprise crew would never do that!!! And by the way whoever made this messed up Kirk he would NEVER say Imperial Captain lines He sounds TOOO MUCH like admiral Piett!!! A better idea idea for a Lego Star Wars/Star Trek would be a what if story about the Enterprise fighting the Empire alongside the Rebels. Now THAT would ROCK!!!!!

  • i remember watching this before i had an accout on 06 we had no copyrigth claims back then because i went on almost every video and it never said this has been blocked

  • @wicked505juggalo lol classic star wars only had two chicks in the entire saga^^only one as a main charackter.

  • As a nerd, this was funny. However the continuity errors are jamming my brain!

  • GO STAR WARS

  • Videos so old! I remember watching this in my youth!

    

  • star wars ever strikes back !!!!!!!!!!!

  • i belive i can tell what happend

    the star treck people jamed the trancmishions to stop the rebels from saying hello so they attacked

  • That was badass!!!!

  • Great, except I don't think the alliance would attack a ship just because it jamming their transmissions.

  • but then they encounter the borg... Gutted to be star wars :/

  • no jedi or sith... star trek got off easy

  • so star wars won......

  • Star Trek pwns star wars. But they both kick major ass. Hey, they're better than babylon 5.

  • @HardRockInc9000 nah star wars pwns star trek

  • @StepheNxMantoN I'm not even gonna bother arguing with you. All you want to do is start a flame war.

  • star trek is gay star wars kicks ass

  • dis is the best star wars vs star trek i hew seen....but wer ar the empire

  • just laik star wars super star destroyer

  • Maybe the OLD Star Trek could have been beaten by star wars but not the NEW Star Trek! (2009 Version)

  • star wars won! of course!

  • damn whoever made this video! Star Trek could beat up star wars without even attacking. Star Trek rules!!!!!!

  • @TaskForceElites lol are you seriously raging about a hilariously bad made video by someone unknown? americans just have way too much time...

  • @blackcrowdkilla ikr i was sooooooo bord i decided to comment on every video i could think of!

  • @TaskForceElites you r totally WRONG star trek copied starwars in every way

  • @marvelkid10

    You retard, star trek came out in1967 and star wars came out in 1977. Do the math(if you can)

  • This was the first YouTube video I saw.

  • LOL

  • h3ck n0 k!ll3r. STAR WARS RUUULES!!!!!!

    The Enterprise 1701 (the one in the vid), all I got to say is, HAHA, that would so totally happen. Like scotty shut the thing down around a planet, so I hear. Ha!

  • this is not a good video because star trek must winning!

  • Cute. Well done, webidiotbox.

  • Sheesh....all they neede to do was cross-link the Heisenberg compensaters to the alluvial dampers ad set the dilithium matrix frequency to 343.72 gH. Better yet, they should see "Hick Trek" to see how it's really done.....

  • @Perion Well, the Federation could help you guys too... For you see, have you heard of the Undine (or Species 8742?) Well, these guys are powerful enough to stop the Borg. And they hate just about everyone in the Star Trek galaxy... So. Yeah. I think you're gonna need our help. WHY? Well, just about every single one of their ships can literally NOT be damaged and 2, only the Federation contains the blueprints to the warheads capable... Crap. We gave those to them. No seriously, we did.

  • wait is this tng or tos?

  • what poop! the enterprise has auto lock phasers. they canèt miss. no its impossible!

  • @TheStarwarsiscool Uh, HELLO! Jamming!!! Incom specialy equipped the T-65 X-wing with Jammers.

  • @TheStarwarsiscool They've missed many times before, and FighterGuDude3214 is correct.

  • @TheStarwarsiscool a wings are fastest in the galaxy....

  • @TheStarwarsiscool There actually WAS an alien life form newely discovered in New Jersey!!! /watch?v=sNYUoSKf2YI

  • Star Trek for the win!

  • a galaxy class could lock on to them with there phaser's. X-wings would not stand a chance

  • @ISSExcelsior2863A uh, no, X-Wing ECM is too powerful for them to get a lock, they would be blown apart by the proton torpedoes, which carry 8 times the firepower of a Photon Torpedo.

  • UUUGGGHHHH! Why the hell is it that its always Star Trek Versus Star Wars? Come ON! Star Wars is a whole different reality than Star Trek. They got Jedi and the Death Star, and Star Trek got Vulcans and the Borg. Its two different types... *Personally, the Enterprise should have detached, or get the Borg or Q to do it.... X-Wings wont stand a chance against the Borg, so would the Death Star....*

  • @julsf14 The Borg wouldn't be able to do anything to Star Wars ships, they are just too powerful, and before you say "They would adapt and assimilate" they wouldn't be able to.

    The Borg have shown various limitations in their capability to adapt and assimilate, Star Wars has displayed that their technology reaches or exceeds all these limitations.

  • @Perion CAN we please just stop arguing? Please, this is ridiculous. What makes ANYONE think that Star Wars would even WANT to fight Star Trek? I mean, if you guys are so SUPERIOR, why would you want to fight in the first place. As a lover of Star Trek and a liker of Star Wars, just stop. It's ridiculous.

  • if your tryin to say star trek sucks your right

  • @uptighthippie you are very wrong

    ièm a loyal star wars AND star trek fan. both are awesome.

  • The person who made this must like star wars more than star trek!

  • yo guys im working on a stopmotion flick on my other channel, livetofightagain. (u can find it under my suscribtions or suscribers) it's sorta HALO and star wars with a slight dash of WW2, thanks

  • This video was made during opposite day. :)

  • 2:55 BOOM SHOCALOCKA

  • Press 8! LOLZ

  • This was awesome 10 pts. to Gryffindor!

  • A-wing kamikaze!!!!!!!!

  • STAR WARS ALL THE WAY!! YAY X-WINGS WON! No offense to those who like Star Trek......

  • star wars is better star trek doesnt make sense

  • 2:43

  • Comment removed

  • star wars is much better

  • I think both SW and ST are amazing

  • GO STAR WARS

  • Would all the bickering just hush and appreciate this for the piece of comedy it's meant to be? Both sides, Trek and wars, sound dumber when they bicker like this.

  • @landencoolsims

    The Enterprise died because it's funny, and because I'm more of a Star Wars fan than a Trekkie. That's about it.

    

  • Screw the haters...

    Give me my eezo mass drivers.

  • how dare u treat star wars like this

  • @Scinlao A Star Destroyer is equipped with mostly long-range sensors, and they are not suitable for detection of targets very close to the hull. Just because they're not designed to detect ships at such short ranges doesn't make them inferior. They are long-range sensors and nothing more, period. And if Star Trek sensors are so superior, why have they failed many times to detect ships that are only hours away at sub-light speeds, and even failed to penetrate a few meters of common minerals?

  • @Scinlao That's relative. A small cloak that can hide a shuttle in Star Trek from sensors might not be strong enough to hide it from Star Wars sensors, which means that it would have to increase in size and power consumtion to might be able to hide. The only reason that the Falcon might be considered a too small ship for a SW cloaking device is perhaps that it can't produce the power needed for a strong enough field to hide from more powerful sensors.

  • @Scinlao The two biggest problems with anti-matter is that it is

    1. Very unstable. Slightest touch to normal matter and you will be turned into vapour in a millisecond.

    2. Expencive and slow to create. It cost vast amounts of money and time today to even create the most minuscule amount of it. The funny thing is that it require more energy to make it than you would get from it, and you will still loose 50% of the energy generated by antimatter thanks to neutrino convertion.

  • @Scinlao It should be easy to use mirrors and lenses to focuse a laser beam (that would hardly cost power) since we use it today. The problem with plasma is that you would have to find a containment field for it, and once you have the containment field it might be far more effective than the plasma itself.

  • @Scinlao You should be aware though (as I understand it ) that theories that has been accepted as possible might not be realistically plausible to create anyway. Scientist might accept the consept of warp drive as possible but they would most likely say that we could never realistically be able to create one anyway. I,m just saying.

  • @Scinlao It's not that much kinetic energy, not enough to rip through a hull (if the hull is not like paper that is). The largest part of the damage comes from heat most likely (i'm not gonna pretend to be an expert in this matter), so the damage should be almost equal from a 50 gigawatt phaser and a 50 gigawatt laser, maybe even more from a laser as it can easily be more focused.

  • @Scinlao Star Trek never uses science either, they use technobabble to describe something(which often includes some funky sub-space field or modulation, or both), but I heard that Gener Roddenberry did use some scientific ideas that are based on modern scientific theories, such as the thing you mentioned about the warp engines, but he never explained it that much in TOS as it contained almost no technobabble. Also, if you want star wars tech explained, by a tech book. I did and i'm very pleased.

  • @Scinlao But the power is still the same. Plasma and light damage through heat transfer, so what's the difference between 50 gigawatt of heat and 50 gigawatt of heat?

  • @Scinlao And a point about lasers vs phasers, it's not the name that makes something more powerful than the other, it's the power the weapons possesses. What's the difference between a 50 gigawatt laser or a 50 gigawatt phaser for example?

  • @Scinlao Yet it can take hours for messages to reach its destination (or even weeks if I remember correctly).

    And it's not that they need to build it, it's that they can't build something so large that quickly. It was the constuction speed I was thinking about. It took the Empire a few years or months to build a 900km wide battle station, while it takes years for the Federation to build a single 600 meter long warship, thus it shows that the Empire has superior production technology.

  • @Scinlao Turbolasers are not lasers. They are something else. And they are powerful enough to melt the crust of a planet which a phaser has never done before as I know it. A federation warship would be turned into a cloud of steam in an instant.

    Star Trek is hardly scientifically accurate. And even if it was it still doesn't disprove that the Empire is faster thus more advanced in its propulsion.

  • @Scinlao If the Federation is more advanced then the Empire, then why can't they travel through their entire galaxy in hours, why can't they build moon sized battle stations in months, why can't they have instant communication across thousands of light years etc. The Federation is primitive in every technological way possible (except transporters as the Empire doesn't have them). Speed, material science, firepower, shields, construction technology, communication, you name it. Think about that.

  • star trek rocks :( dont blow up the enterprize

  • ppl think spock can give vader a pinch but vader has no neck neither shoulders xD

  • trekkies are a load of *******

  • TREKKIES CAN GO SUCK IT !

  • Star Trek vs Predator:

    /watch?v=rIL_J499Esg

  • This video may not be yours, but it's VERY ENTERTAINING !!!!!

  • Phasers are pin point accurate they can hit a ship going at high warp speed @ 200km away

    if you watch SW you see them miss 800 times b4 they hit somthing

    lame video

  • EAT THIS, TREKERS!

  • Lasers in Star Wars aren't actually lasers. It was a slang term, while the actual weapons are particle beam technology.

  • @mortman200 Plasma weapons, I thought?

  • @thelyniezian Older style weaponry and Ion Weapons are based off of Plasma weapons.

    The DC-15 Blaster Rifle used by clone troopers were plasma based.

    Stormtrooper E11 Blaster Rifles are particle based.

    Hope that clears it up a bit.

  • that was awsome go star wars!!!!!!!!!!:)

  • you trekies commenting on this are such nerds (face palm)

  • 1 captin kerk didnt have such a wierd voice 2 captin kerk wouldnt say first catch of the day cause he didnt like hurting ppl...

  • LOL. IM HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!!!!!!!!!!­!

  • love the video ;)

  • Tractor beam would tear the fighters apart.

    The thing about weapon power levels are, they're meaningless really because the technology is different. SW uses lasers which are directed energy beams, ST uses Phasers which are phased energy beams. The phased energy is necessary for damaging the enterprises shielding, directed energy won't even damage navigational shielding, so it's no contest really.

  • @igard81 And yet they have been damaged by simple rocks and electromagnetic weapons (lasers are electromagnetic weapons). The destructive energy is all that matters, not what the beam is made of.

  • See that's the thing. If Picard was commanding this battle, Star Wars would have been destroyed.

  • If Star Trek fans are called "Trekkies," then what are Star Wars fans called? "Warries?"

  • @dookey4635532  lucas hounds, and their called trekkers now. BABULON 5 FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @dookey4635532 No we're called ''The Guys That Know the Good Saga''

  • @CengoShow Ha Ha!

  • @dookey4635532 HA HA To you! :D

  • @CengoShow For what? I don't really support either side.

  • @dookey4635532 Oh I thought you were a trekkie :D

  • WOO GO STAR WARS

  • it is always the a wing

  • Its all ways the A-wing that crashes into the bridge, lol!!

  • I'M HIT!!!! I'M HI-!!!!(BBOOOOMM!!!!!!!!

  • Because all the enterprise had to do is target phasers. Lol the fighters would just blow up, considering they dont have shields xD

  • @RCian2000 Most rebel fighters have shields.

  • @onlypeaceindeath Doesn't matter xD Particle Phasers could drain the significantly lower class shields of the small fighters. And Btw, when the Enterprise targets an enemy, the photon or quantum torpedoes should track and follow them.

  • @RCian2000 Wouldn't work because of the insane amount of jamming "all" Star Wars combat crafts produces.

    Star Wars fighters are designed to fight with some efficiency in such a strong ECM filled environment that pretty much all of their sensors have been rendered useless( they did it during the battle of the first Death Star). A Quantum/Photon torpedo would have serious trouble to hit even one fighter.

  • some Star War fans dream there!

  • star trek could destoy the fighters with ease

  • @Orangeminka I am inclined to agree. people think that star wars ships are so much better, but star trek ships are faster and stronger. In short star trek would win

  • @loganonamac7 actually Wars ships are both faster and stronger. You do know that the numbers for weapon power and shield strength are out there and Star Wars is consistently many orders of magnitude greater than the numbers Star Trek uses right?

  • Star trek should have won Lol

  • @RCian2000 no

  • star wars is way better

  • @addison100100  you are so right star wars is better

  • haha star trek blew up XD

  • Ha Ha Ha Imagine if the Enterprise took on the Falcon. I would like to see theDeath Star destroy a Borg Cube.

  • star wars rules.star trek sucks.(sigh)i wish i was lego.

  • 2:39 the best

  • Captain Kirk has the Enterprise D? Wow there is a little historical error.

  • I'd have thought that the Ent D being made of lego was the historical error you should be noticing.

  • I find Star Trek fans lack of faith disturbing.

  • Why the hell is captin Kirk talking to Data? Isn't TOS set about 2 hundred years before TNG?

  • @gravygwundud 100 I think. But you're right, they are entirely differnt crews and Kirk would have been an old man at the very least by the time Data was made.

  • 1071 are star trek fans -_-

  • @james65508

    Oh, fuck you... I'm a Trekkie and I thumbed this up...