Added: 3 years ago
From: Mmkeeday926
Views: 192,636
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (221)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • seen a russian vid . WAAAAAYYYY BETTER

  • Jut an ordinary acrobats, no improvement. Try comparing on a SU-37. you'll be surprised!

  • mig 29 

  • it just looks likes it floating :O EPIC :D

  • @weewaa101 LOL! Now, regarding the glide slope and angle of attack, I ....

  • Wow, that thing is agile.

  • amazing jets looks like its going slowbut thats most likely due to safety as its a air show.

  • @burninghalls its going slow to show how much agility it has and so people can actually see it not just boom boom all a sudden its higher or lower then it was before lol

  • f22 is just a sexy plane, i bet its as good in bed as it is in the sky.

  • F22A raptor was desighned in 1986 to act as a direct replacement for the F16A falcon and the F15 eagle in the role of primary air superiority fighter. production started 1991

    F35A is being designed to replace the F16(moltirole verient) F/A18A hornet series (reg, super, and EW models) AV8B HARRIER marines use them (along with other countries like UK).... F35A uses F22A parts in its development (with improved electronics) but is NOT replacing the F22A.

    wanted to clear that up for some poeple....

  • if i ever become a pilot im gonna spray a decepticon emblem on the nose haha

  • Acrodats do acrodatics, aircraft do AEROBATICS & THE F-22 is pretty damn good at it

  • That F22 Raptor is possessed, lol.

  • USA!!!!!!

  • Thats amazing

    

  • @matty101a lmfao!!!!

  • No doubt about superiority of f-22.. but i have to agree.. crazy manovers using vetorial trhotle as SU-37 i´ve never seen yet..

  • I was at this airshow and this was the 1st time I ever saw an F-22 fly. It was very impressive. I have since seen the F-22 fly at Reno and the demo was no where near as good as this one - this guy at Nellis was really yanking it around the sky. That was an awesome airshow but the weather was shity. Thanks for posting.

  • 12 Libyan pilots disliked this video

  • @matty101a: The F-22 isn't in service, but the libyans shit her pants, anyways.

  • @TankNutJohn89 Actually the F-22 formally entered service December 2005

  • @cjmsr6669: Yeah, i mean it isn't in use for Libya.

  • @TankNutJohn89 Ya from everything I have read about the jet its relavance would be very limited if at all with an incursion like Libya based on the fact its an air superiority fighter with limited ground attack capability. I don't believe there is much air to air combat going on there.

  • @cjmsr6669: There is a "No Fly Zone" and the lybian Airforce is nearly destroyed.

  • @matty101a its now 14 LOL

  • crazy acrobatics this SU 37 but 22)))))

  • Thrust vectoring has changed the way that jet fighters will move forever. These maneuvers are impossible any other way....

  • Starscream!

  • esas maniobras simples las realiza el SU 35 y MIG 35 que podra ahcer el PAKFA T 50...........?

  • @CGAM01 No hay PAKFA hasta 2015. SU35 y MIG 35 NO PUEDEN hacer esas maniobras.

    Los Rusos son mentirosos.

  • @newmanfrigan se ve que no sabes lo que es empuje vectorial en tres direcciones, el f22 solo tien empuje en 2. por cierto la tecnologia furtiva es sovietica. creo que debria leer antes de comentar

  • aerobatics, not acrobatics

  • My beamer can do all of that =.=

  • I seen a couple of other planes do the same, so it's not that crazy after all. Crazy not at all...

  • @ghm389 still crazy, just not the only plane that can do it.

  • -Apply Gravity Here-

    !!-Error-!!

  • p51d mustang is better than this crap here

  • Great job canceling the F-22 program, Gates. You're a military genius !

    NOT !!!

  • @imallpissedoff F22 is awesome, but crazy expensive to maintain. also, there is no clear role for them, they don't have a purpose ATM.

  • WTF? How can it fly like that. This is not an airplane, it's a helicopter in disquise!

  • You could see Iron Man holding on to the belly.

  • Focus!

    

  • 3:33 got to copy that move ((SWEET))

  • bombs away

  • Best plane in the skies

  • Tom Cruse needs to pilot F22 in the next "TOPGUN" movie!

  • @nismotech NOT, TOPGUN was Navy shit planes. This is US AIRFORCE, key word, AIRFORCE. We get the good shit not the Navy.

  • @lander4545 I don't really understand your comment but if you don't understand the meaning of "Stealth Air Superiority fighter" then why are you even watching this?

  • Very cool and a great video. Thanks.

  • this nothing compared to the aurora hypersonic fighter

  • SOO ? it is same like Russian SU37 and Jevgeni Frolov many year before

  • SOO ? it is same like Russian SU37 and Jevgeni Frolov

  • 2:05 to 2:25 I had a tiny thought in my mind that there might be something going wrong... Nice plane.

  • Flashes the crowd at 0:57 ! :D awesome plane :)

  • starting at 1:55 is amazing

  • @AllofStewie Maneuvers beyond that of the F-22's are pointless in dogfights.

  • @Silencer0151 Dogfights aren't in the Raptor's lexicon,you'll be M.I.A. long before that! ;)

  • @lander4545 Amen. Someone talking sense.

  • slow reacting and bad manuv. plane, but cool electronics.

  • Nice moves but can it fight ?

  • Trying to beat Su-37 aerobatics but dont even come close to it!

  • @Paezuzu  even to Su-27SM1

  • @Paezuzu Who cares? It'll shoot that faggey russian trashpile outta the air before it can do it's girly twirls.

  • its comforting to know the us in on the good side... i am confident when shit hits the fan the american airforce will save us.

  • Come on, does anyone actually think another country can compare to this? The answer is no.

  • @chadnessify

    The upcoming Chinese J-20 and Russian PAK-FA begs to differ.

  • @stormy001 Those are fifth generation fighters, the J-20 will not be operational in the military till' at least 2014, and the PAK-FA until at least 2012. We have had the F-22 since 2005. The F-22 is still superior, and when these planes actually show up the F-22 will be updated accordingly. The US already has a SIXTH gen prototype in the works, the F/A-XX, the successor to the F/A-18. Unless something catastrophic happens we will ALWAYS be superior.

  • @robs104 Ah, you mean like your foreign debt being $14.19 trillion? Better prepare some warm blankets for the FEMA camps.

  • @procletnic Been hearing that for a while now. It doesn't matter, because the debtors don't dare call the debt in as their own economies will go even worse.

    Actually, rumors of our demise have been to early spouted for as long as I can remember....

    I don't believe you. You're a liar!

  • @procletnic FAIL and the fourth comment on my channel proves why. European Union debt about $33 trillion the US debt $14 trillion, and dont come back with 'the EU is not a country' cuz nobody cares, the US is a big country and obviously we're not gonna compare Finland to the US...

  • @DeathValleyRoad Actually you are the one that fails. If you are going to view EU as a whole entity than why not mention that EU has bigger GDP and is a bigger economy than US is? Also the EU debt is at $13,7 trillion and not $30 trillion. You are adding Eurozone debt with EU debt which shows that you dont have any economical knowledge. Continue sleeping while the bankers rob you.

  • @procletnic Actually you have to add up the Euro states debt, and guess what, its over 33 trillion. Of course it has a bigger economy, and it also has more people but still, if we were to compare the US with a couple of Eurocountries that have a population of 310 million, the US would still have a smaller debt. I know its hard to accept, but while the American citizen's debt is $45 000, the average European citizen's debt is about $220 000.

  • @robs104 the f22 is gone dude we dont make it anymore it was one of the worst jets made by america...

  • @DrummingBonham You're an idiot. It's the best jet ever built period. Until the next American jet. Which is already operational. I've seen and filmed it. Enjoying your stupidity though, I must say! Wank on Bonham. Wank on.

  • @newmanfrigan Hmm i wonder why it has been thrown out by the US? It had a major breakdown ever 1.7 hours of flight... and it just cost too much so they have replaced it with the F-35, the F-35 is replacing the f16 too... so yea its like using a gold toilet seat

  • @DrummingBonham The F-35 is not a replacement for the F-22. It is designed for a totally different mission profile and does not have the same air to air capability as the F-22. And your maint number is way off base.

  • @Toddinfantry Yes the F-35 is the replacement for the f-22 the military announced it

  • @DrummingBonham You might want to brush up on your reading there slick, the F 35 is replacing the F16, FA 18 and the Harrier not the F 22. the F 22 is replacing the F 15.

  • @DrummingBonham You either misheard or heard just what you wanted to hear. The F-35 is a direct replacement for the air combat/ ground attack (FA) aircraft such as the F-16, the FA-18 and the AV8. Go back and check you will see I am correct.

  • @robs104 The F/A-XX...

    I'd like to inform you that Belgium already has a 7th gen fighter operational. It's nuclear powered, has mach 9 capability, fire-and-forget air-to-terrorist missiles, and bluetooth. It is actually in this vid, performing 40g barrel rolls in invisible mode.

  • @thekenemy You forgot the cancer curing 20mm cannons. (:

  • @thekenemy It also has a tv, option to fly unmanned and has the ability to fly in space and destroy martians...

  • @thekenemy may i see the link?

  • @thekenemy Bah, that's nothing. Here at Spain we are having a 12 gen fighter bomber. Top speed is Warp 2.24.

    It's in the vid too. Well, more like in the area, because it is currently underground fighting Satan with Ground-to-Satan GTS-666 Smart holy munitions.

  • @thekenemy And there an app for it so you can fly it using just your iphone!!!

  • @thekenemy and bluetooth rofl

  • @thekenemy Um, I thought the f/a-xx was an American plane, and it isn't operational? Of course, if the comment was a joke, I look like a complete idiot! LOL

  • @thekenemy dude that is by far the best comment on youtube ever !

  • @thekenemy thats old technology bro

  • @robs104 if you could just "update" to make it better, we'd just keep updating the F-15.

    The F22 is being shown the door, the F35 is what the US is planning on using to counter the J-20 and company. lower physical performance with better situational awareness (and technology in general).

  • @isays That is not correct. It is simply being stopped at 187 planes. The F35 is a Strike Fighter and will fare poorly if left alone to dogfight. The F22 will fly CAP and the F35 will knock out the ground targets while still being able to put up a decent resistance.

  • @newmanfrigan in a dogfight is when situational awareness matters most (and is what the f35 specializes in). top speed doesn't matter often in a dog fight, and it can get away with being less maneuverable because the cannons are actuated and can shoot in other directions than strait forward.

    actually im not a pilot, i just made that shit up about the dogfight :p.

    f22 is still being shown the door. too expensive and labour intensive to maintain. f35 looks like it may be following suite...

  • @storm Upcoming is the Key word. And they will fail. There is no significant production (or understanding) of advanced composites in Russia or China. US and Europe are the ONLY places that know how to produce these materials. Also, the claim that they will not need the upkeep or cost of the Raptor belies a further ignorance of how a Stealth plane is built and maintained. It costs dozens of hrs per flight hour and 100s of Millions...there is no other way to do itEither lying or in for a surprise.

  • it's called aerobatics

  • We are still very far behind from the aliens.

  • @sactownism your comment hightens my expectations for battle los angeles. cant wait!

  • @TradeMark2003 Can't wait to see that movie myself!

  • @sactownism True. Let's hope that we only fight them in the movies.

  • Wow!! the f-22 is as maneuverable as the SU-37, now the Russians are doomed.

  • I keep thinking the X-Men are gonna jump out of that thing

  • Thats not flying! Thats drafting in a plane

  • @BCBU2410124 drifting?

  • @keffje007 Typo.. and yes

  • beatiful but to expensive

  • 1:59-2.23 is nuts!

  • Talented pilot

  • at 1:55 "This isn't flying. This is falling with style! "

  • You might wanna try to work on your English before you worry about the air force son

  • Fuck you Osama....I hope one of these kill all your wives

  • dat

  • dat plane is very unstable n i was dinking about my future of going to the air force i might not be doing

  • @fuzer25 dat plane in da sky isnt da one i vant to fly when i get da hair on da balls

  • And pricetag per plane is 340mill not 150mill, 50.000$ per hour of flight for maitenence and rises, plus for all weather fighter extreme sensitivity on a rain since it kinda likes to rust alot is not good thing, at all. Nuff said. F-22 is complete fiasco and everyone knows it deal with it. Oh and @gypsykingg you should check how e-radiation works, when you start broadcasting something, it doesnt matter how small you are, others can see you and detect you with ease. Othervise f-22 is blind as bat

  • "The F-22's manufacturer, Lockheed Martin, and the Air Force cite a 30:1 kill ratio between Raptors and their prey. " - washington post, cnn, nbc has same ratio, so 300/0 works only in your fictional brain. At best, if you look @ patriotic US forums you will get 110/1. Second 187, ok, "2/3 of F-22's are downed due to corosion problems" same source as previous, thats, what 65 operational airplanes? And what it makes it good plane when you have to do 30h maitenence just to have 1.7h of flight?

  • it looks like its floating

  • Dude, enough with the focus shit!

  • aaand this: watch?v=KaoYz90giTk

  • Comment removed

  • meh, russian airplanes can do this since 1980's

  • @sstojsin uh you realize these maneuvers are nothing new to most fourth generation fighters? it's not so much the maneuvers that makes the f22 a great plane- but stealth and efficiency at speed. russian planes don't have that yet. so suck it, meh.

  • @onojmai uh you realize this video is about f22's manuverability and not it's stealthness? About efficiency at speed eurofighter beat in in dogfight (within visual range) that was staged a year back i belive, BVR was canceled by USA army next day Even efficiency at speed russian vise, 30 year old sukhoi's do better F117 is stealthier than this thing and 1 was shut down, 2 damageg via 40 year old AA systems. So there is nothing special about this airplane, well maybe it's pricetag. So, suck it

  • @sstojsin the eurofighter has the manuverability of an f 16 you dumb fuck. during operation red flag the f-22 had a 300-0 kill/death ratio over allied fighters. the f-117 was not stealthier than this jet what so ever. this aircraft has a RCS of .001 meters. the pilots helmet will show up on radar before the jet. You're a fucking idiot, jsut because you read some shit on wiki does not make you an expert. You sound so fucking retarded.

  • @gypsykingg you are fcking peace of retarded shit! for breakfast you eat donkey bolloks, for lounch horses and for dinner your! you are so fat and stupid you cant wipe your own ass you have to pay crane to lift you and make small worm hole to wipe it. I can do more unnecessary insults if needed, but do return on subject. Then if craptor is so super-duper, why is it canceled? Even Mcane was against it i belive. Oh and your national tv stations said it all, not wiki.

  • @sstojsin it was canceled because we don't need any more. 187 is plenty when you have a 300-0 kill/death ratio you dumb cock garden. and at 150 million a piece and the cost to maintaine it, it would just be a waste of money to buy more when there is nothing out there that can touch it you dumb fuck. McCain was against it because he is againt the air force all together and is an old pice of senile shit. National tv will tell you anything to get them on your side whether its good or not.

  • @onojmai and this: watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M

  • No ordinary human can fly this thing.

    It is capable of moves that go way beyond 10g.

    Has anybody ever seen detailed photo's or film of the cockpit???

    No...cause it's fuckin' alien.

  • @UHOHYESYEAH lol, or maybe the shits remote controlled.

  • aerobatics* thank you

  • What this shows is how quickly it can point in the right direction. Coupled with being extremely hard to paint with radar...amazing plane.

  • su-37 can do much better than this,,, c

  • @kambing435

    I can top that... Su-47!

  • @kambing435 F-22 kicks the shit out of an Su-37.

  • @kambing435 yeah but the Su-37 isn't an operation fighter!

  • America's air superiority guaranteed=))))

  • @gunlover94 ya lets see the rest of the world try to top that :)

  • LEMON!!!

    For every 1.7 hours of flight it has a failure.

    For every 1 hour of flight, 30 hours of maintenance is required.

  • Great clip, excellent airplane.

  • @Mmkeeday926

    If you these F-22 raptor tricks/aerobatics are crazy for you... What more for the Su-37 Russian fighter Jet?

  • its not acrobatics its called aerobatics

  • You probably wont get to see what they are fully capable of.....and the ones that do usually wont be around long enough to tell about it...........

  • Incredible !

  • HOW???!!!!! (1:50-2:15)

  • @rodrigo100330 thrust vectoring. Pretty cool shit hah.

  • Hell !!! It's so bad ass you can't keep it in focus !

  • Comment removed

  • nah like the sukhoi's with arobatics better lol fail english xD

  • well thats a step climb. :D

  • This jet is balls my bud is so lucky he flys one.id sell my left nut to just sit in this jet

  • i bet newton is rolling in his grave

  • I still dont get what is so special about this plane. Same stuff was done years ago by the Russians/soviets and they didn't need multi billion dollar design systems. zzz zzz. Good video, nice plane but would rather watch the russians.

  • @hsvenforcer yeah, but russian planes are very short-lived... they're designed to handle only a few thousands miles of flight... more over, the SU37 didn't do it thanks to vector thrust

  • @kyro1979 i know there engines didnt live long but afaik the airframes did alright. I know the AL-31FP in the SU-30 was something like 1000hrs between overhauls and 3000hrs it was replaced.

  • Great video, not to be rude but airplanes do aerobatics not acrobatics.

  • same like SU-37 many year ago and Jevgeni Frolov

  • Damn, and this is not even close to what its capable of

  • damn, doesnt that thing stall ever :D Awesome flying

  • No need for autofocus when filming an airshow. Set it manually to infinite focus range. Then, if the plane gets out of focus you better duck because you know its close by!

  • @DrBergdahl HAHA!! SPOT ON....SPOT ON!

  • first time i saw a US pilot fly this crazy, usually the best are the Russians, fly slow and on edge with th eplane ever so stalling all the time, i would love to see this with an F16 which should be very recoverable due to its high thrust to weight ratio.

  • Crazy indeed....

  • great fighter! now try reducing the cost, remove the thrust vectoring and improve maneuverabilty... impossible? well it's been proven wrong with the SU-47 "Berkut"!

  • @HudsonM1A2 thought the su-47 had vectoring

  • @HudsonM1A2 oh never mind it must have been a nother russian jet i saw

    the video had them testing the thrust vectoring tech and then they showed a jet doing backflips like on a single axis

  • I want one. Think they'll let me try before I buy?