ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
@akanippy actually they can they are opposed to the paedophile priests and all priests that are known to have done this are exiled, so get your facts rights !
Wether they want him there or not it doesnt matter. Its the choice of the school and their attendees. Plain and simple, if they want him there they can have him there, if not then no. Thats it.
Hail Mary full of grace the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary Mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.
What are the Catholics afraid of? Why are they afraid of people that have different ideas? Let's face it, nobody wants abortion, but lets keep it legal!
Mister Commie Kremlin trained Apparatchik Negro Dope Smoking Cocaine Snorting Penis Sucking Mister President of this here United States elected by an electorate that have been sucking Jews' peni for the past 100 years finally received an Honorary Doctorate Degree from a Freemasonry satanic Jewish penis loving institution called Notre Dame, a post 1958 Catholic university that is no longer Catholic. What does this mean? It means an animal can get a PhD. It does not mean anything.
Rob has a terrible time listening. He is a bully "answer my question", "answer my question", "answer my question", "answer my question", "answer my question"
Really Rob, he answered it before you asked the question.
Church bows before the State, like it or not. Mr. Donahoe, who would be much happier in the days of the inquisition, doesn't realize that other people's opinions matter, not just his.
Also, why is Donahoe always so ANGRY? Not a good role model for his cause.
For the record, the chick moderating brought up a valid point between "honoring" and "listening" to which Boston did not reply... a method which he has criticized people for about Creationism. I'm not a proponent of Creationism, but what's fair to the goose is fair to the gander, and Mr. Boston lost validation for not directly responding to the question. Seems he was so inflamed by Donahue he forgot his own debate tactics?
I can't figure out why Obama would even accept an honorary degree from such a vile organization, one affiliated with the disgusting Catholic Church. Would he also accept an award from the KKK? Might as well The KKK also has Jesus as their central focus.
Bill Donohue is a filthy, ugly piece of retarded shit from a child-molesting cult of sick, vacuous pedophiles who perverted Humanity for nigh on 1500 years.
None of these scum should have any voice other than responding to roll-call in the prison they're sent to for child-abuse.
The blond idiot is a Creationtard as well, but that's NO surprise from FOX.
That host is really friggin cute. What's here name? Bill Donohue is a mean spirited hate filled religious nut. If someone insults christianity he gets a spot on the news, but his fat ass can insult whoever he wants because he is the leader of chruch movement. And Rob Boston called him out on it.
I really really really hate Bill Donohue, probably almost as much as he hates all unwealthy nonwhite noncatholic nonsuperconservative humans. But I find his antics entertaining, and apparently so do many others. Its sad that hes serious.
@acme181169 - "Abortion is WRONG, but fucking children is OK!"
A good point. B4U-ACT is a Maryland-based group of mental health professionals, psychiatrists and pedophiles who want to normalize pedophilia. Instead of pejoratively calling them "pedophiles, they would prefer that society refer to them by the sensitive and socially-accepting "minor attracted persons." Its going to be next to impossible in the coming decades to protect our kids against these predators.
why doesnt bill help protect the children that are being molested by his fellow travelers in the catholic church if he cares so deeply about protecting children
Ah, note the guy said "church hierarchy" and Bill said "bishops". what about the laity? do their opinions mean completely nothing?
Ha! When Bill said the word "layman" he said it with such disdain. How arrogant. Clearly he supports the inequality between priests and laity. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that one of the reasons for the Protestant reformation?
Arbishop Burke: The purpose of a RC university os to promote "the truths of the faith"....ie indoctrination. I don't think Obama SHOULD have appeared there!
@ClarkKasheta Wishful thinking does not make it true. I cannot believe, with all their money, that this is the best spokeperson that the band of pedophiles church could come up with..........
I love how people get angry at "bill" for defending his church "no matter" what.
and yet we have lawyers defending rapist,murders and thives everyday.
oh innocent until proven guilty!!! yeah right. if you like for ex Peter Althin decieds to only protect rapist and murders... then there is something really wrong with you. he knows they arnt innocent, he just is in it for the money. same with pshycologist who hid their mental patients from the police for murdering,raping out in the street.
Why does Bill blink so damn much when he talks? Is it because he is feeling stressed, lying, or is giving us an arrogant signal? When someone is blinking rapidly when they speak it tells a lot about them.
Boston isn't even a Catholic, he has no business debating this at all. Non-Catholics don't get to speak on behalf of Catholics. It doesn't work that way.
@ModerateGuy738 Hell yes it does, when the band of pedophile enablers can hypocritically moralize and stick their noses in everyone else's business by trying to legislate their phony, hypocritical brand of "morailty". They want such a voice in politics?? Then, tax 'em just like any other busniness because that's what they are.....
Megyn Kelly didn't do anything unfair. She stuck true to the facts - she didn't fabricate that quote, it came straight from the bishops. Notre Dame acted irresponsibly in honoring a man who is pro-actively working against the Doctrine of the Church in his public policy. Why is that so hard for Boston to understand?
Anyone ever notice that everytime there's a secularist vs. religious debate on fox, this dumb blonde bitch ends up siding with the catholic after she stutters for a while?
@thespainisharmada that is fallacious. you can't reject a religion because of a person. that would be like a leftie denouncing comunism because of stalin, pol pot etc
@trollingandhating Isn't communism widely denounced already from people like Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, and Mao? I haven't denounced my religion because of Bill Donohue, but he was a contributing factor.
@thespainisharmada You denounced Catholicism because of Bill Donahue? Sure, he's a dork, but I denounced it because there is no god... Bill's just more proof of that...
It's ridiculous how fat-ass BD and other conskervatives always conscript pro-choice people into their bullshit label, "pro-abortion". I don't know anyone who fits that label. He's such whiny dickhead...........
To REALLY know and expose the worst flaws of the Roman Catholic church - which the media hasn't even discovered yet -, you've got to have known it from THE INSIDE.
To see what I learned as a priest and seminary professor, Google "JesusWouldBeFurious" (one word).
@AfroImpi no my friend , the idiots are the ones who dont support him, my comment seems to be in the highest rated section, so looks like i,m not the only one who agrees with him, just maybe one of the very few who has the gall to say it out loud
@mjcbm2008 I don't think your comment is in the highest rated section, and besides i'd not be very proud to be supportive of such hypocrite individuals like him...
Thanks for your clear an insightful look into the mentality of the Roman Catholic Church. Your argument is clear, concise and utterly without basis as it is simply an ad hominem. Get a better argument you Jew-baiting defender of child molesters. Even in prison, you would be considered the lowest of the low.
@usurynation, that's complete crap 69% of perverts and molesters tend to be white,strait and between 28-45 so as before your logic does not hold water, which is becoming a trend with you, you still have not replyed to my original question, why is it that churches that accept gay bishops and pastor do not have the same problems as the catholic church when it comes to abusing young kids?
@TheDalinkwent i think u need to google "john jay study" that was carried out on abusers in the church 81% of the victims were male aged 14-17, also fact almost 300,000 cases of abuse were reported in schools throughtout america from 91-2000, in those 9 years alone!! the church,s abuse pales in comparrison. u can be sure when the other churches and institutions are subject to the same scrutinity as the r.c church the abuse is just as bad, in my opinion it will be a lot worse
@usurynation, have you ever watched "to catch a predater"? most of those case's envolved strait men molesting young girls, so why do you keep using the failed logic that only gay people commits these act's, but the bigger point is why in churches that openly accept gay bishops and pastor's this isn't a problem or as big a problem as in the catholic church?
WOW! now who'snot making sense, while your right that how they got in doesn't matter, because know one can tell the future, the bigger point is, why nothing was done when they did know, that's seems to be a concept you can't grasp, didn't you say in a earlier post that 85% of the case's involved boys, so what were the other 15% alien's? kind put's a hole in your "only gays abuse young boys" nonsense.
Are you saying that it is ok for a man to be attracted to a 13 yr old? That you believe this erases any criminality or moral implications? Note, I didn't indicate gender, simply age. So, if a priest is caught banging a 13 or 14 year old there is no problem? Is this the hill you wish to plant your flag on? Cause it's the one Bill Donohue is standing on and he's an utter fucking moron.
considering that these things happen the most in the Catholic church in the U.S and in other country's and the people who are supposed to represent the faith do nothing but cover and defend the action's of these monster's.
@TheDalinkwent the media wants us to believe it is a catholic problem but it is most certinaly not , as for" why churches who allow gays to be bishops dont have the same problem" well we will never know until the media turns on them and calls for them to be investgated, which thy wont because they have accepted all forms of immorality and are no stumbling block to having "objective morality" imposed on society, and that sits great with the bigoted media, but the rcc ! no thats gotta go.
@mjcbm2008, You guys all use the same logical nonsense to defend the Catholic church, it's always the media's and gays fault, so it's wrong to report 30 years of child abuse that's prevalent with preist? I don't blame the Catholic Church for what these monster's do, but I do have a problem with the church defending and covering up there actions, all because they think their reputation is more important than children.
@TheDalinkwent more like 60 yearsof abuse, i agree what the bishops did by putting the church first was dispicable, but back then it was the norm to remove the offender for therapy and reinstate him afterwards tht was for all institutions(still is today in some institutions) but thank god that has changed in the church now, the problem is the media protrays the church as not doing anything even thought they have taken great measures to ensure it dosent happen again,
@mjcbm2008, The Cathoilic Church has not taken the proper steps to ensure this doesn't happen, instead of the Pope and his ilk being upset about the monster's running around the Church, they blamed the media and Jew's for horrible history with child abuse, yea real classy move.
@TheDalinkwent no one inth church hs done more to combat abuse and abusers than the pope, especially when he was cardinal ratzinger as head of the conregation of the doctrine of the faith, when his office wasgiven sole responsability of handling and combating abuse it,s because of him that there is now in place a zero tolerance policy reguarding abuse
@mjcbm2008,Sorry blaming the media and jews for your child abuse problems, is the opposite of "zero tolerance", when the Pope was head of the cardinal ratzinger he was aware of the child abuse accusations and had the power to remove and bring the guys in question to justice, yet he hid all the evidence and instead moved the preist in question to another location, if the Pope was really fighting abuse, he would be knocking heads instead of pointing fingers.
@mjcbm2008 ratzinger dident recieve this responablity until 2001, you must be referring to th recent smear campagin by the nyt and other media outlets, actually it fell flat on its face the pope was totally exonerated (yeah i know if we were relying on the media to inform us of that we would still be waiting) do i feel the media has an agend? yes, the amount of lies,half truths, misleading statments by the media are to great to be ignored,the media is meant to report honestly not push an agenda
@mjcbm2008 simply enuf all the pope hadda do was turn names of pedophiles ove to the police, the church insists they take care of it in house. its damage control. the pope and the church cares only for preserving its power.
@TheDalinkwent if we were to balieve the media we would be forgiven for thinking that at least 60-70% of priests were abusers, in fact at the worst point in the abuse crisis worldwide there stood accused 4% of priests worldwide out of that less than 1% were convicted and that was at the peak of the crisis.but this in no way excuses the abusers or the bishops who covered it up, my point is to point out the bigotry in the media when reporting on the church
@mjcbm2008, While i'm glad that you denounce the actions of some in the Catholic Church, you still seem to paint the Church as the victim's of bigortry because the media actually exposed the Pope and many other Bishops, the outrage and anger is not mearly about the child abuse, but it's about the idea that the Pope would put the churches reputation over the safety of children, and the Vatican as a whole was complicit in these actions.
@TheDalinkwent compensate the victims ,yes. get rid of abusers and the bishops who covered up for them yes. but what i am not for is punishing and persecuting the innocent men and women in the church along with the guilty and neither would anyone with any sense of moral justice.
@usurynation, So when a strait person rapes and abuse's children, should the strait community speak out as well? you keep using the "gay logic" while still ignoring evidence of the abuse of girls by priest and the abuse of boys by the Nun's, it's funny how catholic's are the most outspoken about gays, yet keep letting them in the church(as you keep saying) yet they do NOTHING when they abuse power, time to find a new logic.
Organizations are responsible for those they place in leadership positions....it is a fact in law, so accept it.
If you fall for this Bill Donohue nonsense that the attacks were on "post-pubescents" and that somehow this makes it better, you are an immoral, depraved individual.
Gay men are attracted to MEN. Lesbian women are attracted to WOMEN. Priests are attracted to the underage. Bishops and cardinals cover it up.
Uhhh, yeah, an organization is actually responsible for who they put into positions of authority. Imagine that, eh?
And this isn't a gay issue, it is an issue of paedophiles being detected and protected by the church, right up to and including the pope. Frankly, the RC church should be declared a criminal organization (just like the SS) and all it's leadership arrested and jailed.
@usurynation, so what about the many case's of girls being molested by priest? or the nuns who made boys engage in sexual acts as punishment? or the nun's wo molested boys as well? those are at least 35% of the charges, and it's quite justified to condemn the entire catholic church, seeing as the POPE himself covered up these acts and the vatican protected these crimes for decades, you seem determined to pin this as a gay problem instead of a Catholic problem.
@usurynation, So you blame the problem's on Homosexuals. but give the people who covered it up a pass, and many of the priest who are under fire also abused young girls there's even case's of Nun's abusing boys so your gay logic is really a strawman, the bigger issue is why didn't the people in power stop these sick fucks and kick them out of the church? instead they moved them around and protected them from legal action, like I said why aren't you screaming about that?
@usurynation, Homosexuals are not the problem in the Catholic church, it's the Pope and other priest who ignored and protected priest they knew were abusing children, even if your strawman about gays were true, why is it the pope can speak out about a movie that offends him, but be silent about child abuse? why is the pope blaming the media for investigating these horrible crimes instead of knocking heads and using his power to stop these sickos from abusing?
Diddle all the underaged, brainwashed, vulnerable boys you want....but make a decision regarding your own body and the catholics become a lynch mob against you.
Diddle all the underaged, brainwashed, vulnerable boys you want....but make a decision regarding your own body and the catholics become a lynch mob against you.
What a moron Rob Boston is. What was he doing on the show anyway. Of course it was a horrible mistake to give the idiot Soetoro an honorary degree. It quite literally must have been carried out by some coterie of moronic marxist infiltrators to the university.
We are getting a sort of plague of stupid atheists at the moment. I never would have thought it could happen 30 years ago.
It is an absolutely abhorrent way to carry out a debate when the two sides try to talk over one another, but when the person moderating it talks over the debaters? How can anything useful arise from this?
The same Catholics that protest a President for speaking at a College because he has differing views, but ignore and protect preist who are abusing children.
Audotorg- "Debates and defeats?" He didn't even have his facts right. He thinks the Catholic Church equates the death penalty with abortion? The Church is officially against the death penalty, yes, but it is also officially against stealing comic books. But there is no moral equivalency in the Church between the murder of an innocent baby and the legal execution of a convicted serial killer who has received exhaustive due process. Again, both are wrong, but not equal.
Look at all the hate-filled, intolerant, anti-Catholic bigotry posted in the comment section of this web page. And this from the same people who ceaselessly trumpet the virtues of diversity and tolerance! I guess the radical secular jihadists on the left are willing to tolerate just about anything, just as long as they agree with it. Thank you, Bill Donahue, for standing up to these bigoted bullies.
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
@Mogley52 Rodhocetus kasrani not to mention Archaeopteryx.
Also, what do you think of vestigial traits? What is the purpose of non-functioning pelvic bones on a whale? Please respond.
Cartr1dgeBased 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 1 week ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 1 week ago
@akanippy actually they can they are opposed to the paedophile priests and all priests that are known to have done this are exiled, so get your facts rights !
123morian 2 weeks ago
The Roman Catholic Church is in no position to dictate on moral issues. Their record in the paedophile priest scandal is appalling
akanippy 1 month ago 2
Wether they want him there or not it doesnt matter. Its the choice of the school and their attendees. Plain and simple, if they want him there they can have him there, if not then no. Thats it.
AABREU80 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hail Mary full of grace the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary Mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.
archangelco 2 months ago
This is 2.5 years ago now, and nothing really happened. Apparently Rob Boston was right when he said that this is a manufactured controversy
Altamira1835 2 months ago
Chester chester priest molester
sablemase 3 months ago
What are the Catholics afraid of? Why are they afraid of people that have different ideas? Let's face it, nobody wants abortion, but lets keep it legal!
deweypug 4 months ago
Mister Commie Kremlin trained Apparatchik Negro Dope Smoking Cocaine Snorting Penis Sucking Mister President of this here United States elected by an electorate that have been sucking Jews' peni for the past 100 years finally received an Honorary Doctorate Degree from a Freemasonry satanic Jewish penis loving institution called Notre Dame, a post 1958 Catholic university that is no longer Catholic. What does this mean? It means an animal can get a PhD. It does not mean anything.
Search4diabetescure 4 months ago
Donahue looks like a pedophile!
luv4knowledge 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I would tell then to shove their degree up the ass of the dead jew on a stick
nhbiker1961 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who gives a shit what the church thinks? I know I don't.
nhbiker1961 5 months ago
This is fox news for you, how typical! lol
shooglymoogly 5 months ago
Bias'd host is bias'd.
godzilla5500 5 months ago
I gree with Bill on abortin it's killing the Innocent for the sake of the guilty.
jayhawk88z 5 months ago
@jayhawk88z but according to catholics we're all born guilty anyway, so what's one more baby in hell
fdasherv 5 months ago
FOX news is always offended by logic.
zeroeffects88 6 months ago 10
There's no way this Donohue character is for real. He has to be a troll considering the volume of youtube videos showing him embarrasing himself.
zeroeffects88 6 months ago
Bill, gee what a pious man. You can almost see the fractured ego clinging on for life
EmceeKayR 6 months ago
Comment removed
xMrColex 7 months ago
'How dare he disagree with our ideas! Thus, he shall not be treated with respect and will not be allowed in our treehouse/university!'
That's a child's logic, and it's very silly.
TheBanile 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How can anybody, irregardless of who they are, not have a problem with partial birth abortion?
55k3v1n 7 months ago
This news anchor seemed partial toward Donohue.
doorcodad 7 months ago
STOP STEM CELL RESEARCH
dear god, please give us a cure for parkinsons!!!!!
idiots
spatch8806 7 months ago 2
Boston handed it to that idiot Donohue. Why do they even have Donohue for interviews???? He's a fanatic, polarizing, and moron.
oceans19711 7 months ago
"No what's offensive is you!".....good one dingleberry.
Noxshus 7 months ago
Bill, you are awesome.
chrisman737 8 months ago
fck bill
cygnusx555 8 months ago
bill pedophilla donahue is a complete joke, mindless fool.
lukeafire 8 months ago
I'm really starting to like this Rob Boston guy... this is the 3rd video I've watched with him and he always makes a good case. Go Rob Go!
blahblahreadabook 8 months ago
bill donohue is empty brained moron
bindasbolre 8 months ago
Isn't "truth's of the faith" an oxymoron?
nogodformethankyou 9 months ago 2
@nogodformethankyou Maybe not an oxymoron, but certainly a contradiction in terms.
Noxshus 7 months ago
Rob has a terrible time listening. He is a bully "answer my question", "answer my question", "answer my question", "answer my question", "answer my question"
Really Rob, he answered it before you asked the question.
You really admire Bullies?
zzztek 9 months ago
Church bows before the State, like it or not. Mr. Donahoe, who would be much happier in the days of the inquisition, doesn't realize that other people's opinions matter, not just his.
Also, why is Donahoe always so ANGRY? Not a good role model for his cause.
belodeau 10 months ago 2
thumbs up if all you hear when bill donohue is waah waah waah from the adults from the peanuts cartoons.
TheOniWithin 10 months ago
A wild BILL DONAHUE Appeared!
BILL DONAHUE used "No you are!" retort!
...it's not very effective
RSparowe 10 months ago 3
That David Duke analogy is not the same. Its an honorary LAW degree. Not a degree in divinity or religious studies or something like that.
TheGreatRL 10 months ago
God bless the wonderful work Bob Boston is doing.
YourLovelyMan 10 months ago
For the record, the chick moderating brought up a valid point between "honoring" and "listening" to which Boston did not reply... a method which he has criticized people for about Creationism. I'm not a proponent of Creationism, but what's fair to the goose is fair to the gander, and Mr. Boston lost validation for not directly responding to the question. Seems he was so inflamed by Donahue he forgot his own debate tactics?
im3milesdown 11 months ago
You ever watch Bill Donahue just to see if his head might explode?
TheJcanno8 11 months ago 2
@TheJcanno8 no, but i do watch with much hope that it will.
deveraux009 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can't figure out why Obama would even accept an honorary degree from such a vile organization, one affiliated with the disgusting Catholic Church. Would he also accept an award from the KKK? Might as well The KKK also has Jesus as their central focus.
laminator100 11 months ago
Donahue is retarded and pathetic.
JabberCT 1 year ago
Bill Donohue is a filthy, ugly piece of retarded shit from a child-molesting cult of sick, vacuous pedophiles who perverted Humanity for nigh on 1500 years.
None of these scum should have any voice other than responding to roll-call in the prison they're sent to for child-abuse.
The blond idiot is a Creationtard as well, but that's NO surprise from FOX.
allieron 1 year ago
The Catholic church is the largest pedophile ring the world has ever known
SouthernOregonOrgani 1 year ago
That host is really friggin cute. What's here name? Bill Donohue is a mean spirited hate filled religious nut. If someone insults christianity he gets a spot on the news, but his fat ass can insult whoever he wants because he is the leader of chruch movement. And Rob Boston called him out on it.
MGiants82 1 year ago
I really really really hate Bill Donohue, probably almost as much as he hates all unwealthy nonwhite noncatholic nonsuperconservative humans. But I find his antics entertaining, and apparently so do many others. Its sad that hes serious.
ricktor002 1 year ago
Insults and veiled threats. Typical religious nonsense.
Reerrpad5515 1 year ago
"Fundamental Moral Principals"!!!!
Abortion is WRONG, but fucking children is OK!
acme181169 1 year ago 31
@acme181169 You're talking about the religious right, they are pro-life AND pro death penalty.... :-)
yunged 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@acme181169 - "Abortion is WRONG, but fucking children is OK!"
A good point. B4U-ACT is a Maryland-based group of mental health professionals, psychiatrists and pedophiles who want to normalize pedophilia. Instead of pejoratively calling them "pedophiles, they would prefer that society refer to them by the sensitive and socially-accepting "minor attracted persons." Its going to be next to impossible in the coming decades to protect our kids against these predators.
bgibb101 3 months ago
Rob Boston is only a small step below Hitchens. This guy is great!
mrawesome15 1 year ago
why doesnt bill help protect the children that are being molested by his fellow travelers in the catholic church if he cares so deeply about protecting children
miikefan 1 year ago 2
Ah, note the guy said "church hierarchy" and Bill said "bishops". what about the laity? do their opinions mean completely nothing?
Ha! When Bill said the word "layman" he said it with such disdain. How arrogant. Clearly he supports the inequality between priests and laity. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that one of the reasons for the Protestant reformation?
jshweid 1 year ago
Ah, note the guy said "church hierarchy" and Bill said "bishops". what about the laity? do their opinions mean completely nothing?
jshweid 1 year ago
"No what's offensive is you". My god I pissed myself at that.
wolverine005 1 year ago
Megan Kelly is a god soaked idiot.
The typical aborted fetus is a cluster of 150 cells...a houseflys brain has 100,000 cells. This is not a person yet. Whats the problem.
InverStone 1 year ago
Comment removed
InverStone 1 year ago
It is extremely entertaining to watch Rob Boston debate these clowns.
R0YB0T 1 year ago
Why do these kid-fuckers get so upset about abortion? Hello??? THEY RAPE LITTLE BOYS!
godnotfound 1 year ago
@godnotfound Because every baby aborted is one less child they can rape.
sleazybtd 1 year ago 3
Arbishop Burke: The purpose of a RC university os to promote "the truths of the faith"....ie indoctrination. I don't think Obama SHOULD have appeared there!
steveinchelsea 1 year ago
Too bad Donohue's mom didn't have an abortion.
gupsphoo 1 year ago
Comment removed
ClarkKasheta 1 year ago
@ClarkKasheta
Then you didn't pay close enough attention.
feenythewise 1 year ago
@ClarkKasheta Wishful thinking does not make it true. I cannot believe, with all their money, that this is the best spokeperson that the band of pedophiles church could come up with..........
richwfd2002 1 year ago
Donohue is one of the many reasons why I am no longer a catholic along with the pedophiles the intolerance and of course the nonsense they teach
jpc08109 1 year ago
The U.S. government lets these religions have way too much power what ever happened to the first amendment seperation between church and state
jpc08109 1 year ago
I love how people get angry at "bill" for defending his church "no matter" what.
and yet we have lawyers defending rapist,murders and thives everyday.
oh innocent until proven guilty!!! yeah right. if you like for ex Peter Althin decieds to only protect rapist and murders... then there is something really wrong with you. he knows they arnt innocent, he just is in it for the money. same with pshycologist who hid their mental patients from the police for murdering,raping out in the street.
quezcatol 1 year ago
Why does Bill blink so damn much when he talks? Is it because he is feeling stressed, lying, or is giving us an arrogant signal? When someone is blinking rapidly when they speak it tells a lot about them.
jfdoser 1 year ago
Boston isn't even a Catholic, he has no business debating this at all. Non-Catholics don't get to speak on behalf of Catholics. It doesn't work that way.
ModerateGuy738 1 year ago
@ModerateGuy738 Hell yes it does, when the band of pedophile enablers can hypocritically moralize and stick their noses in everyone else's business by trying to legislate their phony, hypocritical brand of "morailty". They want such a voice in politics?? Then, tax 'em just like any other busniness because that's what they are.....
richwfd2002 1 year ago
Megyn Kelly didn't do anything unfair. She stuck true to the facts - she didn't fabricate that quote, it came straight from the bishops. Notre Dame acted irresponsibly in honoring a man who is pro-actively working against the Doctrine of the Church in his public policy. Why is that so hard for Boston to understand?
ModerateGuy738 1 year ago
Comment removed
ModerateGuy738 1 year ago
Typical Fox News... glad Rob Boston doesn't take this bullshit
rightwingwhiteboy911 1 year ago
Anyone ever notice that everytime there's a secularist vs. religious debate on fox, this dumb blonde bitch ends up siding with the catholic after she stutters for a while?
radafat 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why do rational people even bother appearing on FOX news? They can't win.
badtown88 1 year ago
People like Bill Donohue is why I've denounced Catholocism.
thespainisharmada 1 year ago 30
@thespainisharmada Ditto
theshortestpath 1 year ago
@thespainisharmada amen, brother.
ricktor002 1 year ago
@thespainisharmada There's a wide array of Catholics to choose from to fit that role.
devanteswiing 9 months ago
@thespainisharmada that is fallacious. you can't reject a religion because of a person. that would be like a leftie denouncing comunism because of stalin, pol pot etc
trollingandhating 8 months ago
@trollingandhating Isn't communism widely denounced already from people like Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, and Mao? I haven't denounced my religion because of Bill Donohue, but he was a contributing factor.
thespainisharmada 8 months ago
@thespainisharmada You denounced Catholicism because of Bill Donahue? Sure, he's a dork, but I denounced it because there is no god... Bill's just more proof of that...
nogodformethankyou 7 months ago
@nogodformethankyou It wasn't BECAUSE of Bill Donahue. He's more like the frosting on the cake, the affirmation that I made the right decision.
thespainisharmada 7 months ago
how come a retard like Donahue is on television ?
verbod 1 year ago
@verbod Every appearance he makes is eerily similar, isn't it?
drumrnva 1 year ago
@verbod
Probably because the majority of viewers are fellow retards.
badtown88 1 year ago
It's ridiculous how fat-ass BD and other conskervatives always conscript pro-choice people into their bullshit label, "pro-abortion". I don't know anyone who fits that label. He's such whiny dickhead...........
richwfd2002 1 year ago
You can freeze an embryo. You can't freeze a baby. Are they the same?
pchtermino1 1 year ago
If heaven is real, then Bill Donahue is going to hell.
EyeJustSkateboard 1 year ago
Hold on the Bishops are Energised - Some kids are getting raped.
Recushio 1 year ago
bill donohue is speaking truth and is a target for worldly people loving secularism.
xukeith33 1 year ago
@xukeith33 No, he is a target for people who despise hypocritical, loud mouthed, ignorant bigots like Bill.
Like me.
And yes, I do love the world and want to see it preserved in freedom and peace. Do you?
GermanChocolateCake 1 year ago
To REALLY know and expose the worst flaws of the Roman Catholic church - which the media hasn't even discovered yet -, you've got to have known it from THE INSIDE.
To see what I learned as a priest and seminary professor, Google "JesusWouldBeFurious" (one word).
Rayosun 1 year ago
bill donohue is a great man and we need more lik ehim , well done bill keep it up
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008 - you are an idiot for supporting this cunt.
AfroImpi 1 year ago
@AfroImpi no my friend , the idiots are the ones who dont support him, my comment seems to be in the highest rated section, so looks like i,m not the only one who agrees with him, just maybe one of the very few who has the gall to say it out loud
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008 I don't think your comment is in the highest rated section, and besides i'd not be very proud to be supportive of such hypocrite individuals like him...
jrb92 6 months ago
bil donohue is a great man and thank god for him , pity we dont have more like him in the church
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@usurynation
Thanks for your clear an insightful look into the mentality of the Roman Catholic Church. Your argument is clear, concise and utterly without basis as it is simply an ad hominem. Get a better argument you Jew-baiting defender of child molesters. Even in prison, you would be considered the lowest of the low.
rohanwotan2 1 year ago
@usurynation, that's complete crap 69% of perverts and molesters tend to be white,strait and between 28-45 so as before your logic does not hold water, which is becoming a trend with you, you still have not replyed to my original question, why is it that churches that accept gay bishops and pastor do not have the same problems as the catholic church when it comes to abusing young kids?
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent i think u need to google "john jay study" that was carried out on abusers in the church 81% of the victims were male aged 14-17, also fact almost 300,000 cases of abuse were reported in schools throughtout america from 91-2000, in those 9 years alone!! the church,s abuse pales in comparrison. u can be sure when the other churches and institutions are subject to the same scrutinity as the r.c church the abuse is just as bad, in my opinion it will be a lot worse
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@usurynation, have you ever watched "to catch a predater"? most of those case's envolved strait men molesting young girls, so why do you keep using the failed logic that only gay people commits these act's, but the bigger point is why in churches that openly accept gay bishops and pastor's this isn't a problem or as big a problem as in the catholic church?
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@usurynation
"gays abuse teen boys not strait"
WOW! now who'snot making sense, while your right that how they got in doesn't matter, because know one can tell the future, the bigger point is, why nothing was done when they did know, that's seems to be a concept you can't grasp, didn't you say in a earlier post that 85% of the case's involved boys, so what were the other 15% alien's? kind put's a hole in your "only gays abuse young boys" nonsense.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@usurynation
Are you saying that it is ok for a man to be attracted to a 13 yr old? That you believe this erases any criminality or moral implications? Note, I didn't indicate gender, simply age. So, if a priest is caught banging a 13 or 14 year old there is no problem? Is this the hill you wish to plant your flag on? Cause it's the one Bill Donohue is standing on and he's an utter fucking moron.
rohanwotan2 1 year ago
@usurynation,
you asked "how is this a catholic problem"
considering that these things happen the most in the Catholic church in the U.S and in other country's and the people who are supposed to represent the faith do nothing but cover and defend the action's of these monster's.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent the media wants us to believe it is a catholic problem but it is most certinaly not , as for" why churches who allow gays to be bishops dont have the same problem" well we will never know until the media turns on them and calls for them to be investgated, which thy wont because they have accepted all forms of immorality and are no stumbling block to having "objective morality" imposed on society, and that sits great with the bigoted media, but the rcc ! no thats gotta go.
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008, You guys all use the same logical nonsense to defend the Catholic church, it's always the media's and gays fault, so it's wrong to report 30 years of child abuse that's prevalent with preist? I don't blame the Catholic Church for what these monster's do, but I do have a problem with the church defending and covering up there actions, all because they think their reputation is more important than children.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent more like 60 yearsof abuse, i agree what the bishops did by putting the church first was dispicable, but back then it was the norm to remove the offender for therapy and reinstate him afterwards tht was for all institutions(still is today in some institutions) but thank god that has changed in the church now, the problem is the media protrays the church as not doing anything even thought they have taken great measures to ensure it dosent happen again,
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008, The Cathoilic Church has not taken the proper steps to ensure this doesn't happen, instead of the Pope and his ilk being upset about the monster's running around the Church, they blamed the media and Jew's for horrible history with child abuse, yea real classy move.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent no one inth church hs done more to combat abuse and abusers than the pope, especially when he was cardinal ratzinger as head of the conregation of the doctrine of the faith, when his office wasgiven sole responsability of handling and combating abuse it,s because of him that there is now in place a zero tolerance policy reguarding abuse
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008,Sorry blaming the media and jews for your child abuse problems, is the opposite of "zero tolerance", when the Pope was head of the cardinal ratzinger he was aware of the child abuse accusations and had the power to remove and bring the guys in question to justice, yet he hid all the evidence and instead moved the preist in question to another location, if the Pope was really fighting abuse, he would be knocking heads instead of pointing fingers.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008 ratzinger dident recieve this responablity until 2001, you must be referring to th recent smear campagin by the nyt and other media outlets, actually it fell flat on its face the pope was totally exonerated (yeah i know if we were relying on the media to inform us of that we would still be waiting) do i feel the media has an agend? yes, the amount of lies,half truths, misleading statments by the media are to great to be ignored,the media is meant to report honestly not push an agenda
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008 simply enuf all the pope hadda do was turn names of pedophiles ove to the police, the church insists they take care of it in house. its damage control. the pope and the church cares only for preserving its power.
adzug 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent if we were to balieve the media we would be forgiven for thinking that at least 60-70% of priests were abusers, in fact at the worst point in the abuse crisis worldwide there stood accused 4% of priests worldwide out of that less than 1% were convicted and that was at the peak of the crisis.but this in no way excuses the abusers or the bishops who covered it up, my point is to point out the bigotry in the media when reporting on the church
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@mjcbm2008, While i'm glad that you denounce the actions of some in the Catholic Church, you still seem to paint the Church as the victim's of bigortry because the media actually exposed the Pope and many other Bishops, the outrage and anger is not mearly about the child abuse, but it's about the idea that the Pope would put the churches reputation over the safety of children, and the Vatican as a whole was complicit in these actions.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@TheDalinkwent compensate the victims ,yes. get rid of abusers and the bishops who covered up for them yes. but what i am not for is punishing and persecuting the innocent men and women in the church along with the guilty and neither would anyone with any sense of moral justice.
mjcbm2008 1 year ago
@usurynation, So when a strait person rapes and abuse's children, should the strait community speak out as well? you keep using the "gay logic" while still ignoring evidence of the abuse of girls by priest and the abuse of boys by the Nun's, it's funny how catholic's are the most outspoken about gays, yet keep letting them in the church(as you keep saying) yet they do NOTHING when they abuse power, time to find a new logic.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago 2
@usurynation
It isn't a gay issue. Perhaps you meant to say NAMBLA? Possibly they will vote the Pope as Man Of The Year.
rohanwotan2 1 year ago 2
@usurynation
Organizations are responsible for those they place in leadership positions....it is a fact in law, so accept it.
If you fall for this Bill Donohue nonsense that the attacks were on "post-pubescents" and that somehow this makes it better, you are an immoral, depraved individual.
Gay men are attracted to MEN. Lesbian women are attracted to WOMEN. Priests are attracted to the underage. Bishops and cardinals cover it up.
rohanwotan2 1 year ago
@usurynation
Uhhh, yeah, an organization is actually responsible for who they put into positions of authority. Imagine that, eh?
And this isn't a gay issue, it is an issue of paedophiles being detected and protected by the church, right up to and including the pope. Frankly, the RC church should be declared a criminal organization (just like the SS) and all it's leadership arrested and jailed.
rohanwotan2 1 year ago
@usurynation
Uh, yea it was a boy scout problem you nimrod.
badtown88 1 year ago
Are there actually people who take Donahue seriously?! Jesus this man must be the dumbest human being on earth. What a piece of shit.
badtown88 1 year ago 34
This has been flagged as spam show
@badtown88 thats an insult to shit itself
adzug 1 year ago 2
@usurynation, so what about the many case's of girls being molested by priest? or the nuns who made boys engage in sexual acts as punishment? or the nun's wo molested boys as well? those are at least 35% of the charges, and it's quite justified to condemn the entire catholic church, seeing as the POPE himself covered up these acts and the vatican protected these crimes for decades, you seem determined to pin this as a gay problem instead of a Catholic problem.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@usurynation,"The American Catholic hierarchy has a bishop at it's head who controls the priest in his diocese-he decides what info gets out"
Really? that's your excuse? so abusing kids wasn't important enough info to report?
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@usurynation, So you blame the problem's on Homosexuals. but give the people who covered it up a pass, and many of the priest who are under fire also abused young girls there's even case's of Nun's abusing boys so your gay logic is really a strawman, the bigger issue is why didn't the people in power stop these sick fucks and kick them out of the church? instead they moved them around and protected them from legal action, like I said why aren't you screaming about that?
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
@usurynation, Homosexuals are not the problem in the Catholic church, it's the Pope and other priest who ignored and protected priest they knew were abusing children, even if your strawman about gays were true, why is it the pope can speak out about a movie that offends him, but be silent about child abuse? why is the pope blaming the media for investigating these horrible crimes instead of knocking heads and using his power to stop these sickos from abusing?
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Diddle all the underaged, brainwashed, vulnerable boys you want....but make a decision regarding your own body and the catholics become a lynch mob against you.
rmutt4 1 year ago
Diddle all the underaged, brainwashed, vulnerable boys you want....but make a decision regarding your own body and the catholics become a lynch mob against you.
rmutt4 1 year ago
What a moron Rob Boston is. What was he doing on the show anyway. Of course it was a horrible mistake to give the idiot Soetoro an honorary degree. It quite literally must have been carried out by some coterie of moronic marxist infiltrators to the university.
We are getting a sort of plague of stupid atheists at the moment. I never would have thought it could happen 30 years ago.
GMBCATASTROPHE 1 year ago
It is an absolutely abhorrent way to carry out a debate when the two sides try to talk over one another, but when the person moderating it talks over the debaters? How can anything useful arise from this?
ElNerdoLoco 1 year ago
It's amazing the Catholic church is so outspoken about abortion, but are slient when it comes to child abuse in there own church.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
It's amazing the Catholic church is so outspoken about abortion, but are slient when it comes to child abuse in there own church.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
The same Catholics that protest a President for speaking at a College because he has differing views, but ignore and protect preist who are abusing children.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
I don't usually find Donahue appealing, but he handled the discussion quite well this time.
redgoldbluephantom 1 year ago
Pedophilia is evil also, stupid Catholic piece of shit.
vent5 1 year ago
I believe that jesus will come back one day... and punch Bill Donohue right in the fucking nuts!
Slugg329 2 years ago
Audotorg- "Debates and defeats?" He didn't even have his facts right. He thinks the Catholic Church equates the death penalty with abortion? The Church is officially against the death penalty, yes, but it is also officially against stealing comic books. But there is no moral equivalency in the Church between the murder of an innocent baby and the legal execution of a convicted serial killer who has received exhaustive due process. Again, both are wrong, but not equal.
dseanmat 2 years ago
Look at all the hate-filled, intolerant, anti-Catholic bigotry posted in the comment section of this web page. And this from the same people who ceaselessly trumpet the virtues of diversity and tolerance! I guess the radical secular jihadists on the left are willing to tolerate just about anything, just as long as they agree with it. Thank you, Bill Donahue, for standing up to these bigoted bullies.
dseanmat 2 years ago
Rob Boston looks like Christopher Reeve.
jstephenj 2 years ago
i like what megyn kelly is wearing . it gave me an erection
luxfero 2 years ago
@luxfero You mean what she's not wearing
punnet2 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rob Boston seems so bitter and angry.... Donahue easily got the better hand.
Reazzurro90 2 years ago
Bill Donohue is a CUNT.... cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt
NotDanMartineau 2 years ago 28
@NotDanMartineau I like the guy, im not religious at all.
He just seems to be very angry and gets into every debate.
Like it a lot.
quezcatol 1 year ago
@NotDanMartineau Very mature.........
Ave Maria
HailMary53 1 year ago
Archie Bunker LIVES!!!
yesanded 2 years ago 4