@waseem1173 Defnetly not. just check the cpubenchmark site. 3960X is 14,846 and 3930K is 14,464. A difference of 382. This mean that you wont notice ANY difference doesnt matter what you do
@YouEatMyDust You fail at reading, those scores are listed in order of Passmark's value score, which is a cost to score ratio. Best value core on there was a $16 1.9Ghz dual core value scored at 56~.
I only posted that as helpful reference to those looking to build new systems, helping to show cost to performance. You and nobody else can deny that the 2500K scores lower than the 8150 albeit you wind up paying more for the 8150 (less including motherboard cost)
@YouEatMyDust Ah, not according to those benchmark tests. Linus also did an unbias multi-game benchmark on both and they performed identical. What does that mean? None of the high-end games used to bench the CPUs cappped them out. If you want to believe the 2500K outperforms the 8150 then go ahead, but everything points at both not being fully utilized and the 8150 scoring better for the money, far better when you include motherboard prices between Intel and AMD. My post was for the value minded
@XionEternum A game benchmark has the variable of a GPU bottleneck. I saw his test. It was fine for real world applications, but as a proper CPU examination it simply does not cut it. If you want a proper review of the 8150 look elsewhere.
And as for the 8150 it's perfectly fine as a CPU, but fact of the matter is that it does not perform as well despite being late to the party and it has temperature reading problems. I've seen them running on air 10C cooler than ambient, which is impossible.
@Sektor14g I did look elsewhere, and that's what that back-n-forth topic of conversation was about; the Passmark scores of the current mainstream CPUs. Passmark rates the 8150 score-8511 rank-22 value-35.46 and the 2500K at score-7450 rank-36 value-34.65 And my choices in what CPU I get will be based on ALL available information, never speculation or bias enthusiast elitism. I am running an 1100T at the moment because I have an ASUS M4A79T Deluxe AM2+/AM3 and was using a 9850BE. I sought value.
@viralfunnies Reread the post, it doesn't show the FX chips as faster, 8150 scores 8511 and the 2600K scored 10044. I sorted them by their "cost to score ratio" or value column.
@shootingdutchmen Indeed, AMD are where they should be, top of the cost to performance ratio, including the price difference between Intel and AMD motherboards, far far more cost effective to go AMD. Linus ran unbias benchmarking between the 2500K and 8120 (or 8150, can't remember) and game benches were nearly identical. Why? Because neither core capped out in the games benched.
Really appreciate your candor with your closing comments on the x79 platform. Intel appears to be aggressively marketing this platform to mainstream gamers when it is clearly major overkill. The x79 platform is clearly a workstation class platform where the only significant improvements would be experienced with enterprise applications as you mentioned. BF3 does indeed runs extremely well on a 2500k for 1/5th the price and should do well for a couple years. Intel is mismarketing this platform
@StraightShooter01 a i5 2500k ? heck!! even my 1 year and half i5 760 runs BF3 with no problems at ultra it only use the 85% of the processor @ 1920 x 1080
who ever buy this X79 platform for gaming hes either an idiot or a rich MOFO who only want to show off :) the X79 as you said is a workstation.
@StraightShooter01 Not Entirely, IM using an X58 Platform now as a Workstation/Gaming Platform.
The Chipsets are ideal for A/V rendering. These platforms are designed (in my opinion) to be workhorses and provide some entertainment in the mix.. Bare in mind... they are also setting things up for the next generation of Gaming and OS which should prove to jaw dropping insane. This may sound strange .. I Used Macs for 20 years and I just built my own PC this year.. They are just insanely faster.
@papas182 Really .. Macs are nice and i was even considering building a "Hackintosh" (Still might) .. But when you need speed .. I wasn;t about to drop $4000 on a new Mac Pro .. I got the same results for about $1300 with my Rig. Actually a bit more because i just updated my GPU:
@StraightShooter01 no at all just read the comments below... comments saying that crysis 2 will be gods wrath. Intel know that the heavy multitasking people will notice the extra ram slots already and are trying to market their new cpu's to people who have no need for it to make an extra buck(million-billions of them). Not even that thought people do not really realize that these cpu's are heavily over priced and not that more powerful and even bigger. Intel has people rapped in their fingers.
@RustyRazor2010 Toddler, usually it's alot more pleasant to watch him talk about stuff if he'd look more into it. He just looks plain boring and like he's afraid of the camera. Makes the watcher uncomfortable.
@alluville - Smegma sniff, NeweggTV is probably one of the better (if not best) on point retail vender presentations for new retail hardware and other PC system items on YouTube. You get information, comparisons, valid benchmarks and personal insight from hands on installations along with some timely recommendations from a fairly knowledgeable group of people. Direct links take you to the products mentioned. Congeniality is a plus but is not a mandate...leave Paul alone.
come on asus gfx cards i did not think you would steep that low
MythicDaedra 1 month ago
BF3 ftw! woohoo!!!
eerereps 2 months ago
Awesome video, very well explained, honest and to the point.
fkfontaine 2 months ago
Would really like to see a comparison between the 3960X and 3930K.
Lets see if the 3 extra MB's of L3 cache on the X processor is worth the 5 hundred dollar price increment.
waseem1173 2 months ago
@waseem1173 Defnetly not. just check the cpubenchmark site. 3960X is 14,846 and 3930K is 14,464. A difference of 382. This mean that you wont notice ANY difference doesnt matter what you do
MacumbacaoExtrema 1 month ago
dont you just hate when people show benchmarks?
i would rather see someone try to slow down the processor by actually doing something
OneVerce 2 months ago
This computer turns Crysis into God's Wrath.
TheCharrd 2 months ago
@yo6luk Same here.
Dewnby 2 months ago
did i see another + for x79 u can just always swap your ram out
MrJordiR 3 months ago
what do you have against us faildozer?
gumberly 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA called they want their pc back
playPS3play 3 months ago
I feel bad because i watch LinusTechTips and neweggTV
yo6luk 3 months ago 7
@yo6luk As do I.
hockeyNS1 3 months ago
Show us your system Paul
TheDeigratia 3 months ago
Come on Paul ... give us a peek at your home system. You brought it up and inquiring minds want to know. ;)
drakos365 3 months ago 50
@drakos365 I bet it's a humble yet powerful system, kind of like his personality
viralfunnies 3 months ago
@drakos365 this is the newegg youtube channel not paul's channel
vukvuk5 3 months ago
@vukvuk5 True, but should be ok. It is always interesting to see what parts they choose. Such as Linus' water cooled gaming rig.
drakos365 3 months ago
Did he mention what motherboard hes using?
FatmanQQ 3 months ago
Did anyone see the INTEL XEON 8CORES 16 THREADS????!!!!!
blazeitup94 3 months ago
Just looked at the Passmark CPU list on their website. Google Passmark CPU list since cannot post. Sorted by the value column from highest to lowest.
CPU score rank value price
FX-8150 Eight-Core 8511 22 35.46 $239.99
FX-8120 Eight-Core 7282 40 34.68 $209.99
i5-2500K 3.30GHz 7450 36 34.65 $214.99
i5-2400 3.10GHz 6148 66 33.14 $185.50
i7-2600K 3.40GHz 10044 11 31.89 $315.00
i7 980 3.33GHz 10308 8 17.19 $599.49
i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz 12449 2 9.45 $1,317.58
Hope this helps.
XionEternum 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@XionEternum i5-2500K 3.30GHz 7450 36 34.65 $214.99 > FX-8150 Eight-Core 8511 22 35.46 $239.99 :P
YouEatMyDust 3 months ago
@YouEatMyDust You fail at reading, those scores are listed in order of Passmark's value score, which is a cost to score ratio. Best value core on there was a $16 1.9Ghz dual core value scored at 56~.
I only posted that as helpful reference to those looking to build new systems, helping to show cost to performance. You and nobody else can deny that the 2500K scores lower than the 8150 albeit you wind up paying more for the 8150 (less including motherboard cost)
XionEternum 3 months ago
@XionEternum I bet the 2500k out performs the 8150 easy
YouEatMyDust 3 months ago
@YouEatMyDust Ah, not according to those benchmark tests. Linus also did an unbias multi-game benchmark on both and they performed identical. What does that mean? None of the high-end games used to bench the CPUs cappped them out. If you want to believe the 2500K outperforms the 8150 then go ahead, but everything points at both not being fully utilized and the 8150 scoring better for the money, far better when you include motherboard prices between Intel and AMD. My post was for the value minded
XionEternum 3 months ago
@XionEternum A game benchmark has the variable of a GPU bottleneck. I saw his test. It was fine for real world applications, but as a proper CPU examination it simply does not cut it. If you want a proper review of the 8150 look elsewhere.
And as for the 8150 it's perfectly fine as a CPU, but fact of the matter is that it does not perform as well despite being late to the party and it has temperature reading problems. I've seen them running on air 10C cooler than ambient, which is impossible.
Sektor14g 3 months ago
@Sektor14g I did look elsewhere, and that's what that back-n-forth topic of conversation was about; the Passmark scores of the current mainstream CPUs. Passmark rates the 8150 score-8511 rank-22 value-35.46 and the 2500K at score-7450 rank-36 value-34.65 And my choices in what CPU I get will be based on ALL available information, never speculation or bias enthusiast elitism. I am running an 1100T at the moment because I have an ASUS M4A79T Deluxe AM2+/AM3 and was using a 9850BE. I sought value.
XionEternum 3 months ago
@XionEternum lol FX chips are NOT faster than the 2600k, dont care how many cores it has
viralfunnies 3 months ago
@viralfunnies Reread the post, it doesn't show the FX chips as faster, 8150 scores 8511 and the 2600K scored 10044. I sorted them by their "cost to score ratio" or value column.
XionEternum 3 months ago
Comment removed
XionEternum 3 months ago
Comment removed
XionEternum 3 months ago
Comment removed
XionEternum 3 months ago
Comment removed
XionEternum 3 months ago
the asus gtx 580 is JIZZTASTIC!!!!
yeahbzl 3 months ago
AMD wher ar u? hahahah
in the bottom of the list xD
Danilo552 3 months ago
@Danilo552 haha *not funny*
shootingdutchmen 3 months ago
@shootingdutchmen haha xD
Danilo552 3 months ago
@shootingdutchmen Indeed, AMD are where they should be, top of the cost to performance ratio, including the price difference between Intel and AMD motherboards, far far more cost effective to go AMD. Linus ran unbias benchmarking between the 2500K and 8120 (or 8150, can't remember) and game benches were nearly identical. Why? Because neither core capped out in the games benched.
XionEternum 3 months ago
fuck,this stuff needs to improve its taking 1350 w from the wall fuck that
alukardFE 3 months ago
@alukardFE At max output, hardly that bad. 135 watts is nothing. That's about 0.9 cents an hour.
UnknownXV 3 months ago
@alukardFE Can always get a 95W CPU. These CPUs are for enthusiast overclockers, and rich kids with too much money.
XionEternum 3 months ago
Im happy with my 2500k @ 4.7ghz smallffts prime stable for 12hrs
appleloveTK 3 months ago
@appleloveTK you know you can throw it to 5GHz just look one of neweggs vid about overclocking there should be tut
Astro247z 3 months ago
Beat my cinebench by 6 on my rig :( 2500k @ 4.5 vid on channel if you wanna see...well 200vs 1050 dollars so I think I still win :)
chad362wiley 3 months ago
@chad362wiley I'd bet you that Cinebench isn't utilizing more than 4 cores.
AlmostAGamer 3 months ago
paul u need ur own gaming youtube channel :O
kantion5 3 months ago
wow, my i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz scores about a 7800 on pass-mark. So these new sockets are 2wice as fast as my chip!!!
Chillwaving 3 months ago
Code-name for: to freaking expensive for me...
Chillwaving 3 months ago
Glad i waited time to get a new sandy bridge YO
3sonyps 3 months ago
Ok, I'll stick to sandy bridge but I want a great i7 for video editing any suggestions?
frank14725 3 months ago
@frank14725 Sandy Bridge Core i7-2600k 3.4GHz Quad Core right out of the box with great overclocking potential.
Collecian 3 months ago
@frank14725 2500k for an awesome low priced solution. 2600k for really heavy stuff. Both overclock very well.
iAppleMUSIC 3 months ago
Really appreciate your candor with your closing comments on the x79 platform. Intel appears to be aggressively marketing this platform to mainstream gamers when it is clearly major overkill. The x79 platform is clearly a workstation class platform where the only significant improvements would be experienced with enterprise applications as you mentioned. BF3 does indeed runs extremely well on a 2500k for 1/5th the price and should do well for a couple years. Intel is mismarketing this platform
StraightShooter01 3 months ago 34
@StraightShooter01 a i5 2500k ? heck!! even my 1 year and half i5 760 runs BF3 with no problems at ultra it only use the 85% of the processor @ 1920 x 1080
who ever buy this X79 platform for gaming hes either an idiot or a rich MOFO who only want to show off :) the X79 as you said is a workstation.
frank141289 3 months ago
@StraightShooter01 Not Entirely, IM using an X58 Platform now as a Workstation/Gaming Platform.
The Chipsets are ideal for A/V rendering. These platforms are designed (in my opinion) to be workhorses and provide some entertainment in the mix.. Bare in mind... they are also setting things up for the next generation of Gaming and OS which should prove to jaw dropping insane. This may sound strange .. I Used Macs for 20 years and I just built my own PC this year.. They are just insanely faster.
ZoneTelevision 3 months ago
@ZoneTelevision really bro, 20 years?
papas182 3 months ago
@papas182 Really .. Macs are nice and i was even considering building a "Hackintosh" (Still might) .. But when you need speed .. I wasn;t about to drop $4000 on a new Mac Pro .. I got the same results for about $1300 with my Rig. Actually a bit more because i just updated my GPU:
GIGB X58-UD3R
Core i7 950
6 GB 1033 RAM
Corsair AX 750
Corsair 600T case
Samsung 128 SSD
WD 1 TB CAV Black
HD RADEOn 5970
ZoneTelevision 3 months ago
@StraightShooter01 Agreed.
dchains 3 months ago
@StraightShooter01 once pci-e 3.0 cards are out the 2500k wont last long on the top,then we'll see the ivy brige.
Theairplaneguy4ever 3 months ago
@StraightShooter01 no at all just read the comments below... comments saying that crysis 2 will be gods wrath. Intel know that the heavy multitasking people will notice the extra ram slots already and are trying to market their new cpu's to people who have no need for it to make an extra buck(million-billions of them). Not even that thought people do not really realize that these cpu's are heavily over priced and not that more powerful and even bigger. Intel has people rapped in their fingers.
thecam4444 1 month ago
¡lnɐd
NeoxideMolten 3 months ago
Comment removed
NeoxideMolten 3 months ago
Comment removed
NeoxideMolten 3 months ago
Comment removed
NeoxideMolten 3 months ago
Comment removed
NeoxideMolten 3 months ago
paul
vincentx1o6 3 months ago
He did not get too hot THERMALLY speaking...:O
Novulux 3 months ago
Guys they are only $600:D
What my entire computer cost:D
XxBobbyfinxX 3 months ago
After all those videos with ASUS Motherboards, he still goes with an ASRock Motherboard -___-
IMxLEGITxBEAST 3 months ago
@IMxLEGITxBEAST ASUS actually owns ASRock company so....
madoo87 3 months ago
@madoo87 saaaay whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat
IMxLEGITxBEAST 3 months ago
@IMxLEGITxBEAST
AsRock is the budget quadrant of ASUS.
TheIrredeemable 3 months ago
@madoo87 Exactly
ChiefLeftenant 3 months ago
@IMxLEGITxBEAST He used an MSI board on another Sandy-Bridge E video.
ChiefLeftenant 3 months ago
If you run asus gtx 570/580 direct cu ii in SLI two slots apart, top card gets very very hot..
ASDfasdfasdfful 3 months ago
probing paul.....lol
67able1 3 months ago
LGA 2011 was made for the 1%, ima just wait for the new 22m 1155 in 2012.Occupy Intel!!!!! I will be camping infront of newegg build join me guys
TheArea510 3 months ago
@TheArea510 No.
Veence1987 3 months ago
@Veence1987 You wish you were the one percent
TheArea510 3 months ago
Paul Rocks!
sarsbretta77 3 months ago
Didnt JJ want to spot you an ASUS X79 for the benchmarking? lol
Brofessional2010 3 months ago
one word: WOW!!!
sxyphatboy 3 months ago
Enjoy your honesty and personal opinion Paul.
Dracorock16 3 months ago
I can see you're hardware is exposed
xiXOTICix 3 months ago
Very nice. Perhaps I might be able to afford to "rent" a sandybridge-E for a week. lol
MrBaracas 3 months ago
WOW video card over-kill!!
LXBD 3 months ago 8
he has no facial expressions... it's getting ridiculous and cba to look at him anymore
alluville 3 months ago
@alluville - Jerk, this isn't Ren and Stimpy. He gets the information out and makes his point. What more do you need?
RustyRazor2010 3 months ago
@RustyRazor2010 Toddler, usually it's alot more pleasant to watch him talk about stuff if he'd look more into it. He just looks plain boring and like he's afraid of the camera. Makes the watcher uncomfortable.
alluville 3 months ago
@alluville Hey, don't watch it if you don't like it.
Stop wasting his and your own time.
axerer6 3 months ago
@axerer6 Wow, not saying that. :D All I'm trying to do is help the show be better. Giving some good criteria. You should have seen that.
alluville 3 months ago
@alluville Critique*, and that's not exactly constructive critique.
EvilTomte 3 months ago
@alluville - Smegma sniff, NeweggTV is probably one of the better (if not best) on point retail vender presentations for new retail hardware and other PC system items on YouTube. You get information, comparisons, valid benchmarks and personal insight from hands on installations along with some timely recommendations from a fairly knowledgeable group of people. Direct links take you to the products mentioned. Congeniality is a plus but is not a mandate...leave Paul alone.
RustyRazor2010 3 months ago
@RustyRazor2010 NCIX ftw
APhamx7 3 months ago
@APhamx7 - Agreed...
RustyRazor2010 3 months ago
@RustyRazor2010 So ignorant. Why are you talking off topic..?
alluville 3 months ago
AWWWW SNAP, IT'S PAUL!
GoldenGamer789 3 months ago
paul you sure do blink alot... lol
epyonzeroxxx 3 months ago
@epyonzeroxxx lol
Rowsol84 3 months ago
i'm gonna just buy the processor, cause i can't afford any other PC component after i buy it
marcelobos 3 months ago
PAULL FTW!!!!
jmlarios1379 3 months ago
AWWWW YEAAAAHHH
TalkinWTyler 3 months ago
PAUL!
PCstationTV 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yeah, there are much of them
JouwTuube 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
look at all these comments
vukvuk5 3 months ago in playlist More videos from newegg