james bond saw the chicken cross the road. the chicken asked james bond his name. james bond answered. my name isa bond, james bond. and james bond ask the chicken. the chicken replied. my name is ken, chic ken
Bond movies are kind of getting boring now, they need to give it a twist, like put all the old bonds in there as bad guys against Craig or something lol.
This movie is okay, it's better than TWINE but I think its UTTER BS that Halle Berry got double billing with Brosnan. . . I mean I'm sitting here looking at my Bond mpvie collection and the ONLY one with Bond AND the girl on the side is DAD. God I'm so glad the series went in the direction it did with the reboot and Daniel Craig and going back to Fleming's Bond If it hadn't I was absolutely SURE I was gonna see a Jynx spin off film, which would have been AWFUL.
a). I Love Brosnan as Bond, in fact he is my personal favourite
BUT
b). I do agree that DAD was a major mistep - despite some good moments (e.g. the sword fight). Even Pierce himself has apparently admitted he wasn't satisfied with it.
@17jun1989 He couldn't have said that about Dalton as Ian Fleming died in early 1964 and only got to see the first 2 Connery's. He did call Connery an "overgrown stuntman" though initially but (I think) later accepted him.
I do think though that when the cousin of IF says something about Bond we should at least take note.
In fact its irrelevant whether he's the "closest" to Fleming. Truth is, I've always loved Pierce as Bond. I watched him while I was growing up, I saw his face when the name James Bond came to mind, so for me he will always be the best Bond.
However I always thought the furthest Bond from Fleming was Moore. When I read the books Pierce SOMETIMES came to mind as did Dalton and Connery. There were some moments when Brosnan's Bond was very human (cemetary/beach scene in Goldeneye, reunion with Paris).
I can honestly believe Fleming would picked either him or Dalton for the role. They both have the classy, gentlemanly heir to them. Even Christopher Lee - Fleming's cousin - said he thought Pierce was closest. I wouldn't go so far as to say that but I can certainly picture Fleming liking the "image".
@ventroquilation I don't know about you, but, lines like, "I thought Christmas only comes once a year" aren't my type of humour. That's just incredibly cringe-worthy.
@Pinesol131 Slam the studio not the actor for stinko lines like that. It's funny how handsome men get ragged on for being smug and candy ass. Clooney gets the same flak - smug looking, too GQ-ish. Both these guys don't ride on their looks - they havegenuine talent, intelligence, charisma, depth and tremendous ease in front of the camera. Looks would be last on the list in fact.
@markdjfawkner Well said. Lazenby is my favourite and in my opinion the best Bond. He made Bond believable as a human being and a man that could exist in the real world.
@Pinesol131 Shut the fuck up cunt. If you thought Lazenby was the best, then NO ONE should listen to you dick head. He did one fucking film for a reason. Don't start saying Brosnan was pathetic, he was in the top 2, easy. His class, wits and good looks made him a fantastic Bond. You're a fucking idiot for saying he's pathetic and Lazenby was the best altogether you wanker. Are you fucking blind, deaf, and paralyzed? I think you fuckin' are.
@QuickFox2 I laughed so hard when I read this, honestly. Did you know that Lazenby turned down a seven picture deal? Did you know that Brosnan was fired after four films and still bitches about it in interviews? No, of course you didn't, because you're some stupid Brosnan fan who's totally indoctrinated into thinking that Brosnan was the be all and end all. Brosnan was a one-dimensional, self-entitled, superman. That's not James Bond. You'd know if you took the time to read the books.
@QuickFox2 Can you even read? Moreover, Brosnan's era was just a total cliche, with every "iconic" Bond element shoved into each film tirelessly, such as those fucking lame, gadget-laden cars, that require him to push a button and escape a situation, instead of using his intellect and inventiveness, the way it should be done.
@Pinesol131 Guess what fuck face, they're movies. They are not based 100% on the fucking books. What is it with people like you about the fucking books? There is not ONE movie that is based 100% on the books, get over the fucking books. I don't want to read the fucking books, just watch the fucking MOVIE. I don't give a rats ass about doing research on 1960-70 James Bond movies, as far as I'm concerned the other Bonds weren't as classy or smooth as Brosnan and that's what Bond's about FOR ME.
@QuickFox2 True, none are based 100% on the books, but the sixties films were more based on Fleming then not. The sixties films are still regarded as the best in the series, while the nineties and early thousands are held in the poorest regard. If you think that Die Another Day with it's ultra-fake CGI glacier surfing is quality, then this arguement is over, because you're clearly a indoctrinated moron.
@Pinesol131 I'm a moron? When did I ever say Die Another Day was quality? Brosnan could only work with what the directors gave him you idiot FFS! Do you think Brosnan writes the movies? You're clearly a moron for regarding him as poor because you think the CGI was poor. I know it was poor, most people know it was poor, but Brosnan was a fantastic Bond and millions will agree with me, I don't care if you think he was one dimensional, he was 4 dimensional to me. Just STFU.
@QuickFox2 Um... Timothy Dalton went into the role knowing where he wanted to take the character, his scripts were tailored accordingly. The same too can be said about Moore. Brosnan did not and hence each film was patchy in tone and direction. End of discussion.
@Pinesol131 You think Goldeneye is held in the poorest regard? Goldeneye is regarded as one of the best Bond films ever made you moron. Brosnan revived a franchise that was dying and played that role better than Tim Dalton ever would have. You call him weak? I'm pretty sure he'd snap you in half. Brosnan got the job for a reason, because he was suited to play the role that's why he did four movies :) I'd love to see you play James Bond. Just shut the fuck up and SIT THE FUCK DOWN.
@QuickFox2 Yes, it's clear you're mad, I know. I must be hard being a half-wit. Brosnan got the role because the stupid American market wanted him. I agree, he did revive the franchise, but it wouldn't have needed to be revived had LTK been marketed so badly. Moreover, GE, was written for Dalton, hence it's the best Brosnan film, but unfortunantly he's the weakest link in the film. You only have to look at his first encounter with "JANUS" to see how inept he is, haha. I'd love to see me play too
@Pinesol131dont forget also those stupid court cases i think what quick fox forgot is that by the middle of 94 everyone thought dalton was still going to play bond but he declined it i heard that fans were pissed off that brosnan was chosen hell even lazenby was shocked about the decision which says something
@SFNDMK lazenby sucked... worst bond ever. brosnan and connery they are the best.. and craig is good but he needs to "look" like bond IE: dye your hair brown!
@dawnriku laznby sucked but for me was the best phyical bond and had a lot of emotional depth than brosnan four films combined imo. and as for craig i couldnt really care less if he didnt dye his hair...btw i thought bond hair was black...not brown :O
@SFNDMK No Bond's hair was always a dark brown color. The only thing that was switched up with Craig is he has a light brown hair color, but even that wasn't exactly switched up very much if u consider Roger Moore. I didn't like Lazenby at all I thought he was awful and easily my favorites are Connery and Brosnan. (They're tied for first best Bond actor)
@Charchar425 i don't know then i might be colour blind then :P. as for brosnan i really don't know there's something about that i really don't like i mean moore not my favourite but at least i can enjoy what he was trying to do...i didn't get that from brosnan :/
@SFNDMK Brosnan was kind of a transition from the "ian flemming" style bond and into the 21st century. Keep in mind fleming died in 1964 and millions of fans liked the style. So with Brosnan's movies they strayed away from the "ian flemming style" as subtly as possible. So when Craig came in fans were more familiar with Brosnan's style and could go ahead and "re invent" James Bond.
@QuickFox2 I fully agree with your comment, I thought Pierce Brosnan was excellent, I wish he got the role back in 1987, he could have saved us all from Timothy Dalton.
@Pinesol131 You sound like some try hard film reviewer. Just watch the movies and appreciate Brosnan as Bond, because guess what! He did 4 Films! 3 more than Lazenby ever did! Dick head! He should never have been cast as Bond so stfu about him, no one rates him as the best except you.
@QuickFox2 Um, you'll find that Lazenby is growing in stock as the years go by. The reason that Lazenby didn't do more is because he was talked out of a 7 picture deal by his manager. That's 3 more then Brosnan was even offered, buddy. Brosnan was fired. Brosnan made Bond a one-dimensional, metrosexual, parody of a character. He wasn't tough, he wasn't believable. He was in a word: pathetic. What's also pathetic is your argument. It holds no water at all.
@derekis007 Damn straight! Lazenby is given an incredible amount of flak for nothing. He brought James Bond to life. He made Bond a human being and someone we can believe in. He had incredibly physical presance and his dramatic performance could rival that of the other actors and indeed surpass them.
@Pinesol131 , I don't know about surpassing the others' performances but his acting does get better as the film progresses. A lot of OHMSS really works. And it's really unfair how he and Dalton get slammed so dismissively by people. Saw a BBC chat on Youtube where the host and critics said Liz Hurley, even the Teletubbies would make better Bonds than Dalton. On TV! The gall.
@jemimakahn We'll have to agree to disagree on Lazenby, but I do agree that both him and Dalton get far too much unwarranted flak due to popular perception.
There is good in all Bonds: Brosnan has the eleqence, Connery has the voice and swagger, and Kreig has the body. Still it's a tie between Brosnan and Connery for me. The good vs. the nostalgic.
Pierce Brosnan was the best Bond, I wish he had done another movie after Die Another Day. I don't why they decided to dump him, especially for this pouty blonde thug, who may be a talented actor, but he is just not Bond in looks or personality. Bring back Brosnan!!
@Candy4Panda Fuck sake. Brosnan was pathetic! He looked more like a L' Oreal model then Bond. He was the most smug, arrogant tosser of a Bond and his era was the most lifeless, dull and box-ticking era of the series. Save Goldeneye, his films, were generic, bland and unimaginative.
He can also carry off some of the more cinematic elements brilliantly (the humour). Yes DAD was cheesy but IMO that was NOT Brosnan's fault. He could have gone darker but was never given the opportunity. Screw all you Brosnan bashers!! Physically he fitted the part MUCH than DG does. He also had the eligance and the vulnerability. Even Christopher Lee (a cousin of Ian Fleming) says he was the best Bond).
As someone who has read most of the books AND watched the films its probably fair to say that there is the 'literary' Bond AND the 'movie' Bond. To me Pierce Brosnan is the best. As well as looking pretty much EXACTLY how Fleming described him in the books he also has some very Fleming-esque traits (he's a haunted soul and an obvious womaniser)
@mrbain123 Sorry to tell you, but you've got no idea. Brosnan is about as far from Fleming's Bond as it gets. Lazenby and Dalton were the literal character. They both had the fundamental characteristic of his Bond-- they were human, they both portrayed a character we could believe in and aspire to. Brosnan on the other hand was a one-dimensional, smug, gadget-laden, box-ticking Bond. That's not Fleming. He doesn't look like Fleming's Bond either, Dalton does. You're SO wrong it's laughable.
And about Bond never getting hur, don't act like a moron you know exactly what I mean. Ohhh M mentioned the hospital, you know exactly what I ment when I said he never gets hurt. I was talking about in action, did you ever see Bond bleeding or something like this? NO, and you know that I was talking about that and not your shitty example which you only said cause you didn't know what elese to answer.
no i dont understand what your saying really bond gets hurt all the time not to mention i think in all the movies he gets captured so your saying they should make him die?well that would definatly bring the popularity down
He gets hur but never seriously, he only gets scratches. And that's something that made him the way he was. Doning what he does all the time it is pretty impossible that he doesn't really get hurt. I mean for example when he jumps from the roof in tomorroe never dies with his bmw and just NOTHING happens! That's the Bond way how it used to be. Today he would break all bones. But we don't want that cause his invulnerability made him what he was.
And yes he gets captured. But again there never happens anything! He escapes like it was nothing.
That's always the way bond was. He did everything like it was the easyest thing in the worl, with a smile on his lips and a gentlemenlike behavior and a funny comment.
Nothing of what Bond was back then is left now. He is just an ordinary american actionhero now.
do some easy research everyone has a difffrent amount of pain they can take bond is supposed to have the best physical figure and the easiest thing in the world i have no idea what you talking about plus if he never gets hurt just look at all the older movies hes panting for breath and has blood all over his face after the fight you might not like him cause hes british i have no idea why you dont like it and if he got hurt all the time then james bond popularity would deeply go down
plus i have no idea what your talking about everything like a james bond movie is like this they have injuries at the end like bond and in tmnd nothing happens?watch the scene again buddy there no reason to hate james bond and lets think again severly hurt means he can barely move or unconcious that has happened before tbh i think you dont like him because hes british but thats only a theory
And you also got it right, I don't care about the Books because it is about the movies God damnit!!! The Movies never had much to do with the books since fleming even forbid to make movies out of the books! The script was alsways changed for the movies titles changed and stuff. The moviemakers never cared about flemings idea about Bond! And once again, this is about the movies and not about Ian Flemings idea of Bond in the books!
Fuck, you don't get it, who cares if bond was famous before without the stuff I mentioned, nowadays, well, till about 7 8 years ago he was famous for exactly the stuff I mentioned.
I know so many people that grew up with James Bond and they all say Bond got better and better till Moore and turned bad with Brosnan.
And NO I DO NOT care about Bond is portraied!! That's it! You got it right there! Cause the movies are not about his caracter!
Who cares if Bond was famous before? How about Bond fans, or the Bond fandom in general. No, I'm not talking about the shitty-ass fake Bond fandom that you made up, where you are the biggest Bond fan ever. I'm talking about the real Bond fans. It was because of the film 7-8 years ago, Die Another Day, that the producers discovered that they had fucked up so badly, and strayed so far away from James Bond, that they needed to go back, and do it right. Do justice to Ian Fleming and his character...
I agree with that. Bond did get better until Moore. Then got really bad with Brosnan.
There you have it. You don't care about how Bond is "potraied" (this is how the Craig haters are, complete idiots), yet you bitch about how Craig plays Bond. You say he screwed James Bond. All Craig can do is play the character. The gadgets, the bitches, and all that other shit you bitch about, are all up to the producers, but you say Craig screwed Bond. That's an open confession to being a complete idiot.
Here you are, a Craig hater, saying that these movies are not about Bond, but I found another Craig hater, saying that all the movies were about James Bond. This is how divided the Craig haters are amongst themselves. They don't even know what they don't like. They were just people who cried because, oh no, blonde, and didn't want to get over it, so they look for whatever they can to say he's no good. They don't know anything about Bond, which you've proudly admitted to, they just like to bitch.
You say Brosnan doesn't get hurt, yes, Bond never get's hurt, didn't you get that afer over 20 Bonds? That's also one thing that made him so awesome. I mean, you knew he had to die a hundred times in each movie but hey, he is JB, bond doesn't get hurt, that's just like with Chuck Norris. So you just smile and watch him leaving lika a gentleman with not a single scratch. That's the JB style the made him what he ist! Not Craigs american actionhero style.
Umm.... Brosnan got hurt in one of his films. He did. Remember? The World is Not Enough. That piece of crap. He got hurt in that movie. He got hurt at the beginning of that movie. Maybe, you should do a little research on the Bond films. In fact, in the first movie, M says that he just spent six months at a hospital. Do you just not pay attention? That, he doesn't get scratched, bullshit, didn't come around until Moore, where Bond films really started moving away from Ian Fleming's idea of Bond.
wne was not a piece of crap it still had those great broason shoot outs and it was preety intresting i like tommrow never dies much more but wne was still a great film
Such a shame Pierce didn't do the one more he'd hoped to. Instead we've had two terrible Bond films and possibly the worst actor to play the role ever since DaD.
and for all you Craig Lovers I have an important question..."Why'd THEY MAKE BOND GO BLOND???!?!? its not right they've all been dark haired in the past...and not some man who is too muscular and cool for gadgets! I mean come on...could have had made em die his hair to at least match up to be almost has good has the other actors sorry...I sall Die Another Day on tv when I was little so brosnan fan here has well :)
Where are the gadgets, Q, cars, martinis, weapons, the "Bond.. James B.."
It has nothing to do with JB it's just an ordinary actionmovie, nothing more.
I am like the biggest Bond fan ever but I will never watch any new Bondfilms again.
May be that Craig is more like Flemings books but there is one thing that people who say that don't get: JB didn't get that famous because of the books but because of the movies! Most people don't even know there are books too.
You say Craig screwed the style. So, I sit there, expecting to read examples of how Craig did it. Instead, you ask where the gadgets are, where Q is, where's the martinis (though he clearly drinks martinis - which means you weren't paying attention). The weapons? What, a gun isn't a weapon? The Bond James bond thing, that people bitch about. Truth be told, half of Sean Connery's movies did not have that line. For somethings that's "tradition," he rarely said that....
You want to see a movie where Bond became an ordinary action movie, look at Goldeneye, and watch the opening scene. Or, watch the archive scene. All of Brosnan's films were just typical action movies, for fuck sake - they gave him an automatic weapon in Goldeneye, and all he does is find one spot to sit in and blow the shit out of everyone. Of course, they couldn't hit him. He was only two feet away, couldn't be that hard, but they still missed. Action movies sum up the Brosnan era....
You continue on to call yourself the biggest Bond fan. Now that is an attack, an insult, to every James Bond fan in the world. That you, who knows very little about James Bond, or doesn't even seem to care if the character is portrayed properly, would be the biggest James Bond fan ever. You continue after this to present the idea of the character, being more like what the creator initially intended, as a bad thing. You can't be the biggest Bond fan, and then make that kind of statement....
You then remark that the character was not famous before the movies. How the fuck could you be the biggest James Bond fan, then make an idiotic remark like that? Yes, the books were that famous, and Ian Fleming was famous. It was so famous that producers thought they should be made into movies. Believe it or not, in the 1960s, the movies were quite true to the material. It didn't start going another way until Roger Moore, and from then, up until 2006 with Casino Royale, they were all way off....
Your last sentence is the problem I have with the Craig haters. Its filled with people who don't really know anything about James Bond, and don't care about the character, or what Ian Fleming's idea was about. In fact you start off your post, not with reasons why Craig screwed Bond, but by complaining no gadgets, and no Q, and (even though there were martinis) no martinis. Do you just not care about how James Bond is portrayed? Does he not matter to you?
You seem more concerned about gadgets and shit, rather than the character, or the story. The movies that stayed true to the source material, were the ones that moviegoers really interested in Bond. Craig's movie is the first one since then, to do that, and it has been both critically acclaimed, financially successful, and highly regarded by most of the Bond fandom, the real Bond fandom, not your own little Bond fandom where you are the biggest Bond fan ever....
Yes he drinks Martinis, but what I ment is the scene where he was asked about how he wanted his martini and he replys "do i look like I give a shit"
I nearly pissed my pants when I heared that, that's not James Bond as everyone loved him.
Why don't you understand it, he is what he is, a "myth", because of how the movies used to be, reight because of these things that people like you don't like. His invincibility, the gadgets, Q and and stuff, the odd enemys' odd handymen (Jaws, Oddjob,..)
To sum up what you're saying. You just don't care about Ian Fleming's material, and you don't care about making good films that people take seriously and can connect to. You made up your own idea about James Bond. You pretty much said, fuck you, to Ian Fleming, disregarded him and made up your own idea of James Bond, and now say that Bond must be whatever your perverse idea of Bond is what needs to be. That everything of these needs to cater to your ideas and your ideas only....
Read some of the books. Do a little research on the character. Ignorance is not always bliss and trust me, with Bond, that is true. The more you read into him, the better he will become.
Understand that you're not the biggest Bond fan ever, and then come here and talk about how James Bond is supposed to be....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't know why he considered OHMSS a miss. Lazenby isn't that great at being Bond and the ending is a piece of shit but it's not nearly as bad as Live and Let Die.
in 1980 a boy called "jimmy tooth" was riding across the road on his bike. A car hit him. he got up and got knocked down again. 7 times. the 7th time he lay dead. his last words were " the whole world....7 chances"
now you have read this the essence of Jimmy is with you. He is now giving you 7 chances,well,seven videos...
copy and paste this onto 7 videos or you will have 30 mins a chance,7 chances. 3.5 hours of pain.
then you will die on the floor with your eyes open
I agree they say whenever they start work on another bond film they watch it and from russia and that notes. The bond team say ohmss is the perfect soy film
do you know bond won't drink martini, he'll drink COKE, how stupid is that. he's famous by his martini... not coke... AND he won't say "My name is Bond. James Bond." Stupid...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nah nah... He is by far most corniest Bond actor ive seen Daniel Craig and Sean Connery do it justice, I go as far as saying Gerrald Butler would of done a better job as Bond rather than Brosnan.
@dapimp2811 Wow. Pierce Brosnan was without question the worst Bond ever. He walked around with a smug-sense of entitlement. He hammed the role up with soap-operaesque overrating. His era was the most dull, bland, unimaginative, box-ticking era in the series. Him and his movies, in a word, sucked.
We dont think so of daniel craig looks so much like Boris Becker - the tennis player of 10 years back,Everytime i see daniel its a funny reminder of boris-a blonde 007 doesnt really work at all....especially if he looks like that tennis player.Tony Sc arlett looks and acts the part-go to.JAMES BOND-TONY SCARLETT-youtube
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@all the Daniel Craig haters: You such silly fucking stupid idots. You know nothing about Bond when you say so. You suck,suck,suck. DC is much better then Pierce, but Pierce isn't bad. But Die another Day is the baddest bond film of all time .
Hershey rides again!
jbourne0071 2 months ago
he is bond, james bond
mu11champione 2 months ago
I think his name is Bond.....James bond.
PS360Million 4 months ago
His name is Bond, James Bond.
TheYannick22 8 months ago
press two alot it looks like bond is humping that dude loool
BEATLESRAWSOME97 8 months ago
james bond saw the chicken cross the road. the chicken asked james bond his name. james bond answered. my name isa bond, james bond. and james bond ask the chicken. the chicken replied. my name is ken, chic ken
jeryco25 9 months ago
The name's Bond. Jimmy Bond.
WebVMan 9 months ago
Press the 1911 button! Funny.
Alextheghul 10 months ago
is funny how john cleese played R in the world is not enough, and in Die another day he played Q
30NIGHTCRAWLER30 10 months ago
@30NIGHTCRAWLER30 He got promoted
DTH003 10 months ago
@DTH003 LMFAO XD
30NIGHTCRAWLER30 10 months ago
Bond movies are kind of getting boring now, they need to give it a twist, like put all the old bonds in there as bad guys against Craig or something lol.
Darkstarfoxx 11 months ago
This movie is okay, it's better than TWINE but I think its UTTER BS that Halle Berry got double billing with Brosnan. . . I mean I'm sitting here looking at my Bond mpvie collection and the ONLY one with Bond AND the girl on the side is DAD. God I'm so glad the series went in the direction it did with the reboot and Daniel Craig and going back to Fleming's Bond If it hadn't I was absolutely SURE I was gonna see a Jynx spin off film, which would have been AWFUL.
washbrook45 1 year ago
omg i dont think that anyone can replace pierce bronsan because he has the most "james bond look"
Kennefo 1 year ago
brosnan should have been in casino royale, however he would have been too old for the part
yresme 1 year ago
worst bond movie ever.. give us another goldeneye,, "for england james.... no for me.."
88carlos88 1 year ago
a). I Love Brosnan as Bond, in fact he is my personal favourite
BUT
b). I do agree that DAD was a major mistep - despite some good moments (e.g. the sword fight). Even Pierce himself has apparently admitted he wasn't satisfied with it.
mrbain123 1 year ago
I thought Ian Fleming said Sean Connery didnt portray hes Bond well. And he said at a time Timothy Dalton played hes Bond the Best.
17jun1989 1 year ago
@17jun1989 He couldn't have said that about Dalton as Ian Fleming died in early 1964 and only got to see the first 2 Connery's. He did call Connery an "overgrown stuntman" though initially but (I think) later accepted him.
mrbain123 1 year ago
@mrbain123 Your right, probably someone else said that about Timothy Dalton then.
17jun1989 1 year ago
@17jun1989 Desmond Llewlyn (a.k.a. Q) said he thought TD was the closest to the Fleming's character.
mrbain123 1 year ago
@mrbain123 He was right.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
I do think though that when the cousin of IF says something about Bond we should at least take note.
In fact its irrelevant whether he's the "closest" to Fleming. Truth is, I've always loved Pierce as Bond. I watched him while I was growing up, I saw his face when the name James Bond came to mind, so for me he will always be the best Bond.
mrbain123 1 year ago
Im not denying Lazemby wasn't close either.
However I always thought the furthest Bond from Fleming was Moore. When I read the books Pierce SOMETIMES came to mind as did Dalton and Connery. There were some moments when Brosnan's Bond was very human (cemetary/beach scene in Goldeneye, reunion with Paris).
mrbain123 1 year ago
I can honestly believe Fleming would picked either him or Dalton for the role. They both have the classy, gentlemanly heir to them. Even Christopher Lee - Fleming's cousin - said he thought Pierce was closest. I wouldn't go so far as to say that but I can certainly picture Fleming liking the "image".
mrbain123 1 year ago
Anyone who thinks Die "CGI-infested" Another Day is a quality film is an absolute moron.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
calling OHMSS a miss? I call shenanigans!
GavenRocker 1 year ago
james bond= pierse brosnan
i have stopped watching bond movies since brosnan quit.
prakash2187 1 year ago 2
@prakash2187 Will that means your missing one
of the best part about bond!
58fenix 1 year ago
pierce brosnan IS the best bond!!!!
natte1314 1 year ago
@natte1314 Agree!:D
Martinpianomovies 1 year ago
I love james bond
airsoft0071 1 year ago
@ventroquilation I don't know about you, but, lines like, "I thought Christmas only comes once a year" aren't my type of humour. That's just incredibly cringe-worthy.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131 Slam the studio not the actor for stinko lines like that. It's funny how handsome men get ragged on for being smug and candy ass. Clooney gets the same flak - smug looking, too GQ-ish. Both these guys don't ride on their looks - they havegenuine talent, intelligence, charisma, depth and tremendous ease in front of the camera. Looks would be last on the list in fact.
jemimakahn 1 year ago
@jemimakahn I respect Brosnan as an actor and would agree with your statement in his non-Bond roles. I never brought him as Bond.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
Sean was first, so therefore the best, but Pierce was also good...Craig is definitely the worst
OfficialHopHip 1 year ago
Sean Connery was the best Bond !
fafa194 1 year ago
Lazenby rocked. He is quoted as saying he thought the franchise was dead. Mmmmm.
markdjfawkner 1 year ago
@markdjfawkner Well said. Lazenby is my favourite and in my opinion the best Bond. He made Bond believable as a human being and a man that could exist in the real world.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131 Shut the fuck up cunt. If you thought Lazenby was the best, then NO ONE should listen to you dick head. He did one fucking film for a reason. Don't start saying Brosnan was pathetic, he was in the top 2, easy. His class, wits and good looks made him a fantastic Bond. You're a fucking idiot for saying he's pathetic and Lazenby was the best altogether you wanker. Are you fucking blind, deaf, and paralyzed? I think you fuckin' are.
QuickFox2 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 I laughed so hard when I read this, honestly. Did you know that Lazenby turned down a seven picture deal? Did you know that Brosnan was fired after four films and still bitches about it in interviews? No, of course you didn't, because you're some stupid Brosnan fan who's totally indoctrinated into thinking that Brosnan was the be all and end all. Brosnan was a one-dimensional, self-entitled, superman. That's not James Bond. You'd know if you took the time to read the books.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 Can you even read? Moreover, Brosnan's era was just a total cliche, with every "iconic" Bond element shoved into each film tirelessly, such as those fucking lame, gadget-laden cars, that require him to push a button and escape a situation, instead of using his intellect and inventiveness, the way it should be done.
Please respond, I need another good laugh! =)
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131 Guess what fuck face, they're movies. They are not based 100% on the fucking books. What is it with people like you about the fucking books? There is not ONE movie that is based 100% on the books, get over the fucking books. I don't want to read the fucking books, just watch the fucking MOVIE. I don't give a rats ass about doing research on 1960-70 James Bond movies, as far as I'm concerned the other Bonds weren't as classy or smooth as Brosnan and that's what Bond's about FOR ME.
QuickFox2 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 True, none are based 100% on the books, but the sixties films were more based on Fleming then not. The sixties films are still regarded as the best in the series, while the nineties and early thousands are held in the poorest regard. If you think that Die Another Day with it's ultra-fake CGI glacier surfing is quality, then this arguement is over, because you're clearly a indoctrinated moron.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131 I'm a moron? When did I ever say Die Another Day was quality? Brosnan could only work with what the directors gave him you idiot FFS! Do you think Brosnan writes the movies? You're clearly a moron for regarding him as poor because you think the CGI was poor. I know it was poor, most people know it was poor, but Brosnan was a fantastic Bond and millions will agree with me, I don't care if you think he was one dimensional, he was 4 dimensional to me. Just STFU.
QuickFox2 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 Um... Timothy Dalton went into the role knowing where he wanted to take the character, his scripts were tailored accordingly. The same too can be said about Moore. Brosnan did not and hence each film was patchy in tone and direction. End of discussion.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131 You think Goldeneye is held in the poorest regard? Goldeneye is regarded as one of the best Bond films ever made you moron. Brosnan revived a franchise that was dying and played that role better than Tim Dalton ever would have. You call him weak? I'm pretty sure he'd snap you in half. Brosnan got the job for a reason, because he was suited to play the role that's why he did four movies :) I'd love to see you play James Bond. Just shut the fuck up and SIT THE FUCK DOWN.
QuickFox2 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 Yes, it's clear you're mad, I know. I must be hard being a half-wit. Brosnan got the role because the stupid American market wanted him. I agree, he did revive the franchise, but it wouldn't have needed to be revived had LTK been marketed so badly. Moreover, GE, was written for Dalton, hence it's the best Brosnan film, but unfortunantly he's the weakest link in the film. You only have to look at his first encounter with "JANUS" to see how inept he is, haha. I'd love to see me play too
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131dont forget also those stupid court cases i think what quick fox forgot is that by the middle of 94 everyone thought dalton was still going to play bond but he declined it i heard that fans were pissed off that brosnan was chosen hell even lazenby was shocked about the decision which says something
SFNDMK 1 year ago
@SFNDMK Yep. Well said.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@SFNDMK lazenby sucked... worst bond ever. brosnan and connery they are the best.. and craig is good but he needs to "look" like bond IE: dye your hair brown!
dawnriku 1 year ago
@dawnriku laznby sucked but for me was the best phyical bond and had a lot of emotional depth than brosnan four films combined imo. and as for craig i couldnt really care less if he didnt dye his hair...btw i thought bond hair was black...not brown :O
SFNDMK 1 year ago
@SFNDMK No Bond's hair was always a dark brown color. The only thing that was switched up with Craig is he has a light brown hair color, but even that wasn't exactly switched up very much if u consider Roger Moore. I didn't like Lazenby at all I thought he was awful and easily my favorites are Connery and Brosnan. (They're tied for first best Bond actor)
Charchar425 1 year ago
@Charchar425 i don't know then i might be colour blind then :P. as for brosnan i really don't know there's something about that i really don't like i mean moore not my favourite but at least i can enjoy what he was trying to do...i didn't get that from brosnan :/
SFNDMK 1 year ago
@SFNDMK Brosnan was kind of a transition from the "ian flemming" style bond and into the 21st century. Keep in mind fleming died in 1964 and millions of fans liked the style. So with Brosnan's movies they strayed away from the "ian flemming style" as subtly as possible. So when Craig came in fans were more familiar with Brosnan's style and could go ahead and "re invent" James Bond.
Charchar425 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 I fully agree with your comment, I thought Pierce Brosnan was excellent, I wish he got the role back in 1987, he could have saved us all from Timothy Dalton.
ANOTHERHOLEINYOHEAD 9 months ago
@Pinesol131 You sound like some try hard film reviewer. Just watch the movies and appreciate Brosnan as Bond, because guess what! He did 4 Films! 3 more than Lazenby ever did! Dick head! He should never have been cast as Bond so stfu about him, no one rates him as the best except you.
QuickFox2 1 year ago
@QuickFox2 Um, you'll find that Lazenby is growing in stock as the years go by. The reason that Lazenby didn't do more is because he was talked out of a 7 picture deal by his manager. That's 3 more then Brosnan was even offered, buddy. Brosnan was fired. Brosnan made Bond a one-dimensional, metrosexual, parody of a character. He wasn't tough, he wasn't believable. He was in a word: pathetic. What's also pathetic is your argument. It holds no water at all.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
dude, George Lazenby was AWESOME in "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" why did he only play in one Bond movie??
derekis007 1 year ago
@derekis007 Damn straight! Lazenby is given an incredible amount of flak for nothing. He brought James Bond to life. He made Bond a human being and someone we can believe in. He had incredibly physical presance and his dramatic performance could rival that of the other actors and indeed surpass them.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
@Pinesol131 , I don't know about surpassing the others' performances but his acting does get better as the film progresses. A lot of OHMSS really works. And it's really unfair how he and Dalton get slammed so dismissively by people. Saw a BBC chat on Youtube where the host and critics said Liz Hurley, even the Teletubbies would make better Bonds than Dalton. On TV! The gall.
jemimakahn 1 year ago
@jemimakahn We'll have to agree to disagree on Lazenby, but I do agree that both him and Dalton get far too much unwarranted flak due to popular perception.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
Shadow57534: It's Sean you idiot
InternetSurfer1996 1 year ago
There is good in all Bonds: Brosnan has the eleqence, Connery has the voice and swagger, and Kreig has the body. Still it's a tie between Brosnan and Connery for me. The good vs. the nostalgic.
Wissenschaftsgeck 1 year ago
Pierce Brosnan was the best Bond, I wish he had done another movie after Die Another Day. I don't why they decided to dump him, especially for this pouty blonde thug, who may be a talented actor, but he is just not Bond in looks or personality. Bring back Brosnan!!
Candy4Panda 1 year ago
@Candy4Panda Fuck sake. Brosnan was pathetic! He looked more like a L' Oreal model then Bond. He was the most smug, arrogant tosser of a Bond and his era was the most lifeless, dull and box-ticking era of the series. Save Goldeneye, his films, were generic, bland and unimaginative.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
Connery and Craig are the best of the Bond actors!
MrTeddyBass 1 year ago
John Connery was a WAY better James Bond.
Shadow57534 1 year ago
@Shadow57534 It's Sean. Not John. Retard
themaclover4ever 1 year ago
He can also carry off some of the more cinematic elements brilliantly (the humour). Yes DAD was cheesy but IMO that was NOT Brosnan's fault. He could have gone darker but was never given the opportunity. Screw all you Brosnan bashers!! Physically he fitted the part MUCH than DG does. He also had the eligance and the vulnerability. Even Christopher Lee (a cousin of Ian Fleming) says he was the best Bond).
mrbain123 1 year ago
As someone who has read most of the books AND watched the films its probably fair to say that there is the 'literary' Bond AND the 'movie' Bond. To me Pierce Brosnan is the best. As well as looking pretty much EXACTLY how Fleming described him in the books he also has some very Fleming-esque traits (he's a haunted soul and an obvious womaniser)
mrbain123 1 year ago
@mrbain123 Sorry to tell you, but you've got no idea. Brosnan is about as far from Fleming's Bond as it gets. Lazenby and Dalton were the literal character. They both had the fundamental characteristic of his Bond-- they were human, they both portrayed a character we could believe in and aspire to. Brosnan on the other hand was a one-dimensional, smug, gadget-laden, box-ticking Bond. That's not Fleming. He doesn't look like Fleming's Bond either, Dalton does. You're SO wrong it's laughable.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
Pierce Brosnan is the Best!
genrolecaspe 1 year ago
i hate roger moore
Gencturk92 1 year ago
Hey Bond Fans check out my channel for my Bond animation! With all the bonds!
mattpartridge 1 year ago
Die Another Day:
Song - awful, but somehow catchy
Swordfights: Excellent
Babes: Rosamund was simply irresistible.
Cars: what cars? They were invisible. (surely the worst dramatic idea ever in cinema)
Best scene: The sword fight by a mile
jazzx251 1 year ago
:D ;D
spcellforever 2 years ago
rosamund pike is a sexy actress in die another day
badturkali 2 years ago
this movie was absolute garbage.
brewtality101 2 years ago
i love this movie its the best
4u2luvvvv 2 years ago 7
The names Bond, James Bond!
bigjamesbondfan 2 years ago 20
And about Bond never getting hur, don't act like a moron you know exactly what I mean. Ohhh M mentioned the hospital, you know exactly what I ment when I said he never gets hurt. I was talking about in action, did you ever see Bond bleeding or something like this? NO, and you know that I was talking about that and not your shitty example which you only said cause you didn't know what elese to answer.
h0ktar 2 years ago
its a fictional story dude it entertains me dont know about you people have diffrent opinions
imhood37 2 years ago
Well it may entertein you but to the people who loved bond for what made him so special in the old movies, this is just another american actionmovie.
h0ktar 2 years ago
no i dont understand what your saying really bond gets hurt all the time not to mention i think in all the movies he gets captured so your saying they should make him die?well that would definatly bring the popularity down
imhood37 2 years ago
He gets hur but never seriously, he only gets scratches. And that's something that made him the way he was. Doning what he does all the time it is pretty impossible that he doesn't really get hurt. I mean for example when he jumps from the roof in tomorroe never dies with his bmw and just NOTHING happens! That's the Bond way how it used to be. Today he would break all bones. But we don't want that cause his invulnerability made him what he was.
h0ktar 2 years ago
And yes he gets captured. But again there never happens anything! He escapes like it was nothing.
That's always the way bond was. He did everything like it was the easyest thing in the worl, with a smile on his lips and a gentlemenlike behavior and a funny comment.
Nothing of what Bond was back then is left now. He is just an ordinary american actionhero now.
h0ktar 2 years ago
do some easy research everyone has a difffrent amount of pain they can take bond is supposed to have the best physical figure and the easiest thing in the world i have no idea what you talking about plus if he never gets hurt just look at all the older movies hes panting for breath and has blood all over his face after the fight you might not like him cause hes british i have no idea why you dont like it and if he got hurt all the time then james bond popularity would deeply go down
imhood37 2 years ago
plus i have no idea what your talking about everything like a james bond movie is like this they have injuries at the end like bond and in tmnd nothing happens?watch the scene again buddy there no reason to hate james bond and lets think again severly hurt means he can barely move or unconcious that has happened before tbh i think you dont like him because hes british but thats only a theory
imhood37 2 years ago
"Pierce Brosnan says he will do one more" if only that were true. well I guess we can just take Everything or Nothing for what it's worth.
Nate2764 2 years ago
yeah i wondering about that too :(
thewewguy8t88 2 years ago
You don't know nothing about the Bond style, you yust think you are cool because you like the new "real" Bond.
h0ktar 2 years ago
And you also got it right, I don't care about the Books because it is about the movies God damnit!!! The Movies never had much to do with the books since fleming even forbid to make movies out of the books! The script was alsways changed for the movies titles changed and stuff. The moviemakers never cared about flemings idea about Bond! And once again, this is about the movies and not about Ian Flemings idea of Bond in the books!
h0ktar 2 years ago
Fuck, you don't get it, who cares if bond was famous before without the stuff I mentioned, nowadays, well, till about 7 8 years ago he was famous for exactly the stuff I mentioned.
I know so many people that grew up with James Bond and they all say Bond got better and better till Moore and turned bad with Brosnan.
And NO I DO NOT care about Bond is portraied!! That's it! You got it right there! Cause the movies are not about his caracter!
h0ktar 2 years ago
Who cares if Bond was famous before? How about Bond fans, or the Bond fandom in general. No, I'm not talking about the shitty-ass fake Bond fandom that you made up, where you are the biggest Bond fan ever. I'm talking about the real Bond fans. It was because of the film 7-8 years ago, Die Another Day, that the producers discovered that they had fucked up so badly, and strayed so far away from James Bond, that they needed to go back, and do it right. Do justice to Ian Fleming and his character...
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
I agree with that. Bond did get better until Moore. Then got really bad with Brosnan.
There you have it. You don't care about how Bond is "potraied" (this is how the Craig haters are, complete idiots), yet you bitch about how Craig plays Bond. You say he screwed James Bond. All Craig can do is play the character. The gadgets, the bitches, and all that other shit you bitch about, are all up to the producers, but you say Craig screwed Bond. That's an open confession to being a complete idiot.
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
Here you are, a Craig hater, saying that these movies are not about Bond, but I found another Craig hater, saying that all the movies were about James Bond. This is how divided the Craig haters are amongst themselves. They don't even know what they don't like. They were just people who cried because, oh no, blonde, and didn't want to get over it, so they look for whatever they can to say he's no good. They don't know anything about Bond, which you've proudly admitted to, they just like to bitch.
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
You say Brosnan doesn't get hurt, yes, Bond never get's hurt, didn't you get that afer over 20 Bonds? That's also one thing that made him so awesome. I mean, you knew he had to die a hundred times in each movie but hey, he is JB, bond doesn't get hurt, that's just like with Chuck Norris. So you just smile and watch him leaving lika a gentleman with not a single scratch. That's the JB style the made him what he ist! Not Craigs american actionhero style.
h0ktar 2 years ago
Umm.... Brosnan got hurt in one of his films. He did. Remember? The World is Not Enough. That piece of crap. He got hurt in that movie. He got hurt at the beginning of that movie. Maybe, you should do a little research on the Bond films. In fact, in the first movie, M says that he just spent six months at a hospital. Do you just not pay attention? That, he doesn't get scratched, bullshit, didn't come around until Moore, where Bond films really started moving away from Ian Fleming's idea of Bond.
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
wne was not a piece of crap it still had those great broason shoot outs and it was preety intresting i like tommrow never dies much more but wne was still a great film
imhood37 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was a piece of crap.
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
lol how watch the movie one more time its not the best bond movie but its still really good
imhood37 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I've seen it plenty of times. Piece of crap....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
thats your opinion dude its not a bad movie ceartain parts i didnt like but all james bond movies are good
imhood37 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes. It is my opinion. And I'm going to say it again. It is a piece of crap....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
No one has a match against fantastic sir Pierce Brosnan ! He is the best bond ever.....
andreshems67 2 years ago
Such a shame Pierce didn't do the one more he'd hoped to. Instead we've had two terrible Bond films and possibly the worst actor to play the role ever since DaD.
JackTraven2525 2 years ago
James Bond RULES!!!!!!!
007filmfanatic 2 years ago 10
All of the Bond movies and actors are fantastic!
bigjamesbondfan 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Daniel Craig and Sean Connery are the best 007s hands down.
1. Daniel Craig
2. Sean Connery
3. Timothy Dalton
4. George Lazenby
5. Roger Moore
6. Pierce Brosnan
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
sean connery and pierce brosnan are the best to 007s hands down
CaptainAndrewMorgan 2 years ago 10
sean connery and pierce brosnan the best james bond 007
1 sean connery
2 pierce brosnan
3 roger moore
4 timothy dalton
5 george lazenby
6 daniel craig
9mariotoledo 2 years ago
"I think my mouth is too big"
"no its the right size"
Best line ever
3star2nr 2 years ago 3
and for all you Craig Lovers I have an important question..."Why'd THEY MAKE BOND GO BLOND???!?!? its not right they've all been dark haired in the past...and not some man who is too muscular and cool for gadgets! I mean come on...could have had made em die his hair to at least match up to be almost has good has the other actors sorry...I sall Die Another Day on tv when I was little so brosnan fan here has well :)
StuartTheGamerNerd 2 years ago
i'd love 2 b an evil villian in a bond film
TuRdSandwitch18 2 years ago 2
I hate the new James Bond. Sean Conrey and Pierce Brosnan are the best.
metalsnake27 2 years ago 4
And Daniel Craig!!
dyscon8 2 years ago 5
Nope! Not Daniel Craig!^^
MisterSaltarello 2 years ago
Yes! Daniel Craig!
ZombieMan04 2 years ago 3
Craig screwed the whole Bond style.
Where are the gadgets, Q, cars, martinis, weapons, the "Bond.. James B.."
It has nothing to do with JB it's just an ordinary actionmovie, nothing more.
I am like the biggest Bond fan ever but I will never watch any new Bondfilms again.
May be that Craig is more like Flemings books but there is one thing that people who say that don't get: JB didn't get that famous because of the books but because of the movies! Most people don't even know there are books too.
h0ktar 2 years ago
You say Craig screwed the style. So, I sit there, expecting to read examples of how Craig did it. Instead, you ask where the gadgets are, where Q is, where's the martinis (though he clearly drinks martinis - which means you weren't paying attention). The weapons? What, a gun isn't a weapon? The Bond James bond thing, that people bitch about. Truth be told, half of Sean Connery's movies did not have that line. For somethings that's "tradition," he rarely said that....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
You want to see a movie where Bond became an ordinary action movie, look at Goldeneye, and watch the opening scene. Or, watch the archive scene. All of Brosnan's films were just typical action movies, for fuck sake - they gave him an automatic weapon in Goldeneye, and all he does is find one spot to sit in and blow the shit out of everyone. Of course, they couldn't hit him. He was only two feet away, couldn't be that hard, but they still missed. Action movies sum up the Brosnan era....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
You continue on to call yourself the biggest Bond fan. Now that is an attack, an insult, to every James Bond fan in the world. That you, who knows very little about James Bond, or doesn't even seem to care if the character is portrayed properly, would be the biggest James Bond fan ever. You continue after this to present the idea of the character, being more like what the creator initially intended, as a bad thing. You can't be the biggest Bond fan, and then make that kind of statement....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
You then remark that the character was not famous before the movies. How the fuck could you be the biggest James Bond fan, then make an idiotic remark like that? Yes, the books were that famous, and Ian Fleming was famous. It was so famous that producers thought they should be made into movies. Believe it or not, in the 1960s, the movies were quite true to the material. It didn't start going another way until Roger Moore, and from then, up until 2006 with Casino Royale, they were all way off....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
Your last sentence is the problem I have with the Craig haters. Its filled with people who don't really know anything about James Bond, and don't care about the character, or what Ian Fleming's idea was about. In fact you start off your post, not with reasons why Craig screwed Bond, but by complaining no gadgets, and no Q, and (even though there were martinis) no martinis. Do you just not care about how James Bond is portrayed? Does he not matter to you?
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
You seem more concerned about gadgets and shit, rather than the character, or the story. The movies that stayed true to the source material, were the ones that moviegoers really interested in Bond. Craig's movie is the first one since then, to do that, and it has been both critically acclaimed, financially successful, and highly regarded by most of the Bond fandom, the real Bond fandom, not your own little Bond fandom where you are the biggest Bond fan ever....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
Yes he drinks Martinis, but what I ment is the scene where he was asked about how he wanted his martini and he replys "do i look like I give a shit"
I nearly pissed my pants when I heared that, that's not James Bond as everyone loved him.
Why don't you understand it, he is what he is, a "myth", because of how the movies used to be, reight because of these things that people like you don't like. His invincibility, the gadgets, Q and and stuff, the odd enemys' odd handymen (Jaws, Oddjob,..)
h0ktar 2 years ago
To sum up what you're saying. You just don't care about Ian Fleming's material, and you don't care about making good films that people take seriously and can connect to. You made up your own idea about James Bond. You pretty much said, fuck you, to Ian Fleming, disregarded him and made up your own idea of James Bond, and now say that Bond must be whatever your perverse idea of Bond is what needs to be. That everything of these needs to cater to your ideas and your ideas only....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
Read some of the books. Do a little research on the character. Ignorance is not always bliss and trust me, with Bond, that is true. The more you read into him, the better he will become.
Understand that you're not the biggest Bond fan ever, and then come here and talk about how James Bond is supposed to be....
ZombieMan04 2 years ago
well thats a possitive thought.....
(wtf??)
Computerdisplay 2 years ago
Who doesn't love Bond?
bigjamesbondfan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't know why he considered OHMSS a miss. Lazenby isn't that great at being Bond and the ending is a piece of shit but it's not nearly as bad as Live and Let Die.
Whyavier 2 years ago
Halle Berry is so hot!
bigjamesbondfan 3 years ago 5
A little poignant when the reporter states at the end, "Pierce Brosnan will definately do a fifth Bond film then.."
That would of been good!
TRUMPER007 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Harrison Ford would do great as James bond.
jedilord88 3 years ago
considering him or Dalton in 1987- YES.
HeinzPL 3 years ago
If we are going to use old people for James Bond from now on the only guy with the right to do it would be Connery.
Computerdisplay 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
in 1980 a boy called "jimmy tooth" was riding across the road on his bike. A car hit him. he got up and got knocked down again. 7 times. the 7th time he lay dead. his last words were " the whole world....7 chances"
now you have read this the essence of Jimmy is with you. He is now giving you 7 chances,well,seven videos...
copy and paste this onto 7 videos or you will have 30 mins a chance,7 chances. 3.5 hours of pain.
then you will die on the floor with your eyes open
jk19studios 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol ur retarded
chromeunit 3 years ago
I certainly don't count OHMSS as a 'miss'!!!
It might just be my favourite bond movie!
simonjeffery13 3 years ago 3
simonjeffery13 - I agree with you. OHMSS is one the top 5 best Bond movies. It's well written.
coolcat20million 3 years ago
great plot but i dont think the aussie (george) done it for bond
dagiantpoo2 3 years ago
I agree they say whenever they start work on another bond film they watch it and from russia and that notes. The bond team say ohmss is the perfect soy film
bigzooweek 3 years ago
Most definatly, there hasn't been another Bond film that has ended like it.
batmanofni 3 years ago
what is OHMSS?
chromeunit 3 years ago
On her majesty's secret service
britboy564 3 years ago
why didnt he do another one? i mean pierce?
menotrequired 3 years ago
harrision ford as james bond :D......
jjjjjhulk 3 years ago
die another day was one of the worst bond films
NottinghamForest22 3 years ago 5
do you know bond won't drink martini, he'll drink COKE, how stupid is that. he's famous by his martini... not coke... AND he won't say "My name is Bond. James Bond." Stupid...
principohan 3 years ago
Well if we're going into drink Bond would've drunk a Vespa, a drink he named himself...
evilotto77cheese 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hated it when he was James Bond did it no justice at all.... Pierce Brosnan thanks for ruining the series of movies
KeithAlexandre 3 years ago
pierce brosnan was a freakin genius you idiot!!! best bond by far!
dapimp2811 3 years ago 18
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nah nah... He is by far most corniest Bond actor ive seen Daniel Craig and Sean Connery do it justice, I go as far as saying Gerrald Butler would of done a better job as Bond rather than Brosnan.
KeithAlexandre 3 years ago
BROSNAN IS THE BEST
pkmag7 3 years ago 8
DEFINITLY!!!
why doesn't he do it anymore :(
he was the best
not to mention gorgeousss!
411smithy411 3 years ago
@dapimp2811 Wow. Pierce Brosnan was without question the worst Bond ever. He walked around with a smug-sense of entitlement. He hammed the role up with soap-operaesque overrating. His era was the most dull, bland, unimaginative, box-ticking era in the series. Him and his movies, in a word, sucked.
Pinesol131 1 year ago
Comment removed
jemimakahn 1 year ago
que asco me da este tio! la puta madre que le pario
pantonez 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all single guys check my profile
abati04 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Pierce is da best 007. Daniel Craig sucks...
principohan 3 years ago
THATS WAT I SAY
pkmag7 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We dont think so of daniel craig looks so much like Boris Becker - the tennis player of 10 years back,Everytime i see daniel its a funny reminder of boris-a blonde 007 doesnt really work at all....especially if he looks like that tennis player.Tony Sc arlett looks and acts the part-go to.JAMES BOND-TONY SCARLETT-youtube
modestyblaisegirl 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's very easy to tell Brosnan is the best bond so far, second comes Sean Connery. The rest is just shit.
barthoedemaker 3 years ago
who's that lady next to Brosnan around 1.19? is it his wife?
ruantengyi 3 years ago
yeah thats his wife.
bananaoil7 3 years ago
Really, wow, she is so beautfiul! i wonder what's her name?
ruantengyi 3 years ago
I'm almost 100% sure cause I saw an interview with him and his wife and I think it's the same lady.
Yeah she is really beautiful!
bananaoil7 3 years ago
Kelly-Shay Smith!!!!
seanknew 3 years ago
yes keely shave smit
kissxxxlove452 3 years ago
c'mon pierce brosnan is the best bond.
rig48 3 years ago 3
james bond is cool.
if were to rate the actors.
Its Pierce, Moore, Connery, Craig, Dalton, Lazenby.
AK123dun 3 years ago
its the right size
GFAWJ 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@all the Daniel Craig haters: You such silly fucking stupid idots. You know nothing about Bond when you say so. You suck,suck,suck. DC is much better then Pierce, but Pierce isn't bad. But Die another Day is the baddest bond film of all time .
agentzero1234 3 years ago
i think ur retarded.
mrwario1 3 years ago 2