Fourier Analysis 8: Convergence Theorem of a Fourier Series

[invaderjmgjerwin]

XD..tape rolled out

[khalidwalankar]

CAAAAALM YOUR BAAAALLS, no one is running after you!!! or maybe wanna pee? PAUSE IT AND GO then come and talk SLOWLY PLEASE

[AryaSravaka]

@khalidwalankar man, he is doing this for free, Apprieciate his noble work, It s us who need to listen carefully

[peonyguo]

fourier series is still so confusing.....

I read a lot of books

still a lot of that i don't understand

[Ganjin88]

Try reading paul's math notes. Maybe that would help.

[AryaSravaka]

@Ganjin88 bullclio01 's channel..so good for calculus 3. Donylee thanks gre8 wrk

[bluesrunthegame]

At x sub zero or "x not" as you say, I see that the fourier series converges to half the sum of the limit of the function f of x to "x not" from the left and from the right. But I don't understand why the fourier series oppraches that value as the function approaches "x not". If we go a certain distance away from "x not" in the example the graph is continuous, so shouldn't the fourier series lie on the graph? Thanks for the lecture.

[in00bee]

I think he's saying x nought, just btw...

[en14vn]

thanks, the lecture is great.

btw, are you talking like that on purpose?

haha great videos though

[shinigami0018]

Great videos, good job man, u rock.