@TheDerekWN hahaha , you definetly cannot , Shadows at 4 times resolution and Animated Trees over the whole Region will fuck your PC very badly im not even sure if you can activate Deferred at all xD
@MsKristy111 , actually its a very old Video , just btw , check out the newest one and no everything you´ve counted is not Extreme Graphics , not for Second Life , Second Life is extremly limited in Graphic and Physics , and the worst is most of the 60000 users a day can´t even see the Windlight Shader which brings water reflections and sky textures , its a shame
scripted movements in sl look unnatural , and avatar movement through bush or grass areas is comical as is the 1 dimensional view to a 3d object close up , top games are in a different league to this.Imagine picking up object in sl throwing at a tree and a branch or leaves falling to the floor,thats extreme graphics,not just a distant visual
SL doesnt use PhysX....its just very NVidia Optimized.... the reason why its so fucking crap on ATI.... and yea maybe there are some benefits of SLI in SL....but i´ve never heard of more FPS in SL with SLI.... always less..
From what I read in forums ATI si not the way to go if you are looking for the maximum quality graphically since some options don't seem available and apparently is not OpenGL friendly re: fps. However I have seen an ATI card that had beautiful graphics but that wasn't in shadows etc. Would be nice to have the option to test all these thingson the same PC :-).
theres no benefit from using a ATI card its the opposite , its much harder to get Shadows completly correct working like on NVidia, and SL´s Engine is Originally about 9 Years old and were redone in 2003 when it released, but against Crysis its very moddable and depends 99% of what YOU are making out of it, it can look so FUCKING realistic sometimes , just with the right Sky , Daytime , and Settings...
When I research the benefit of SLI I know you say it has ZERO benefit yet others say they do benefit. Possibly because they don't have their single card optimized? Some say you need to enable SLI in Full Window mode at the monitors native resolution or use SLI antialiasing which may be a big benefit and someone mentioned using a card dedicated to physx but does SL use that technology. Nvidia says SLI is supported (maybe not well though). I can' find benchmarks anywhere or tests.
I agree that depending on your system SL does look very realistic especially with Windlight. I like to use windlight to light avatars for filming purposes rather than facelamps. Those attachmeents are hideous :-).
this Video is very old btw , i can run GI with avg 20 FPS on this SIM with same Sys as in this Video, but yes more CPU mhz means faster SL, and better Video Card than GTX 260 is mostly useless (btw GTX 260 is the best you can have for shadows , its a Video which seems like work all perfect for Shadows in Second Life)
My theory is the better the vid card the more effects at the same fps as the slower vid card? I did some tests with SLI for a year. It works if you consider going from 200 fps down to 30 fps :-). I checked some utilities and the single card is loading at about 70% (gtx 460 768mb). In SLI both cards are loading at 50% so they appear to be doing SLI however the performance SUCKS. I have tried having the extra card do the AA but not sure how to do that in the Control Panel.
Performs very well depending on which viewer and when. I heard SL has tried a few different things and then changed nack for the moment and also the latest Nvidia drivers seem to have majotr problems with OpenGl with a lot of software including Adobe apps so a lot f people using those for income are not happy. Supposedly a fix in Jan. but it's been a good few months as an issue.
yes Crysis runs thousand times better..... this Video is Old, very old its from the original 2.0 Viewer which has a max FPS of 15 with Global Illumination (which actually looks like shit like you can see in this video) Kirstens S20 now runs with 25 FPS even with Global Illumination on and looks thousand times better
no, because i activated Global Illumination, wich halfed my FPS from 30 to 15, then set the Shadow Resolution to 5 times which causes 10 more FPS to fall
@NiranV Hey niran i have 5970 and i7920 when i have everything max it just crashes on loading. when i disable RenderUsefbo it works. But then its no shadows. And light is kinda wierd ? I have my latest driver my os is win7 x64
i hate those 470´s and 480´s they´re crap , i wait until a 460 comes out and no i dont get a new card, because my card is more than enough for everything even vor Kirsten Viewer with Shadows , watch my other Videos to see it
first, the "Lag" comes from Global Illumination which halfed my 30 FPS to 15, second i set the Shadow Resolution to 5 , which means they are 5 times more precise which caused my frames to drop to 5 , normally it doesnt lag so much, watch my other Videos and you´ll see it @LilBaby im using GTX 260
So is there any benefit to using a faster video card than a 260GTX? When you enable shadows etc. I read that most of the performance it is due to the cpu? So the faster the cpu the better? From what I have read and seen cpu speed is more important than the number of cores? And optimizing the speed of your overall system ie: multiple hard drives and ram disk.
pretty! one of kirstens viewers? i asked about the lag, and he said that he'll be working on the render code eventually! which means we might be able to use this as our default viewer at some point~ atm it's too laggy for me :(
Can someone say shitty PC?
TheDerekWN 2 months ago
@TheDerekWN nope , just shity settings
NiranV 2 months ago
@NiranV That's why I can run those same settings at 60 FPS.
TheDerekWN 2 months ago
@TheDerekWN hahaha , you definetly cannot , Shadows at 4 times resolution and Animated Trees over the whole Region will fuck your PC very badly im not even sure if you can activate Deferred at all xD
NiranV 2 months ago
@TheDerekWN anyway , if you watch my other videos you will see that i can run Deferred with way better graphics than this old shit with 30 FPS easily
NiranV 2 months ago
fps 5 ???
Online969 3 months ago
wow, my graphics suck ass compared to this.... well it sucks ass to average graphics anyways
windy1311 3 months ago
whats the name of this song. this is my preferred type of music
burster8boostar 4 months ago
@burster8boostar sorry i dont know anymore... its one of those audioswap things and i dont know which....there are so many
NiranV 4 months ago
@NiranV then let me know when you find it again
burster8boostar 4 months ago
Low FPS :P
Dawdan2 9 months ago
well you have the same lag on ultra than me in the lowest quality where everything looks gray and awful ¬¬ LOL
rOdriigO1997 1 year ago
@MsKristy111 , actually its a very old Video , just btw , check out the newest one and no everything you´ve counted is not Extreme Graphics , not for Second Life , Second Life is extremly limited in Graphic and Physics , and the worst is most of the 60000 users a day can´t even see the Windlight Shader which brings water reflections and sky textures , its a shame
NiranV 1 year ago
scripted movements in sl look unnatural , and avatar movement through bush or grass areas is comical as is the 1 dimensional view to a 3d object close up , top games are in a different league to this.Imagine picking up object in sl throwing at a tree and a branch or leaves falling to the floor,thats extreme graphics,not just a distant visual
MsKristy111 1 year ago
SL doesnt use PhysX....its just very NVidia Optimized.... the reason why its so fucking crap on ATI.... and yea maybe there are some benefits of SLI in SL....but i´ve never heard of more FPS in SL with SLI.... always less..
NiranV 1 year ago
@Kai2oo6
What would they be?
fuzonacid 1 year ago
@Kai2oo6
From what I read in forums ATI si not the way to go if you are looking for the maximum quality graphically since some options don't seem available and apparently is not OpenGL friendly re: fps. However I have seen an ATI card that had beautiful graphics but that wasn't in shadows etc. Would be nice to have the option to test all these thingson the same PC :-).
fuzonacid 1 year ago
theres no benefit from using a ATI card its the opposite , its much harder to get Shadows completly correct working like on NVidia, and SL´s Engine is Originally about 9 Years old and were redone in 2003 when it released, but against Crysis its very moddable and depends 99% of what YOU are making out of it, it can look so FUCKING realistic sometimes , just with the right Sky , Daytime , and Settings...
NiranV 1 year ago
When I research the benefit of SLI I know you say it has ZERO benefit yet others say they do benefit. Possibly because they don't have their single card optimized? Some say you need to enable SLI in Full Window mode at the monitors native resolution or use SLI antialiasing which may be a big benefit and someone mentioned using a card dedicated to physx but does SL use that technology. Nvidia says SLI is supported (maybe not well though). I can' find benchmarks anywhere or tests.
fuzonacid 1 year ago
@NiranV
I agree that depending on your system SL does look very realistic especially with Windlight. I like to use windlight to light avatars for filming purposes rather than facelamps. Those attachmeents are hideous :-).
fuzonacid 1 year ago
Furries!
brianchris4 1 year ago
this Video is very old btw , i can run GI with avg 20 FPS on this SIM with same Sys as in this Video, but yes more CPU mhz means faster SL, and better Video Card than GTX 260 is mostly useless (btw GTX 260 is the best you can have for shadows , its a Video which seems like work all perfect for Shadows in Second Life)
NiranV 1 year ago
@NiranV
My theory is the better the vid card the more effects at the same fps as the slower vid card? I did some tests with SLI for a year. It works if you consider going from 200 fps down to 30 fps :-). I checked some utilities and the single card is loading at about 70% (gtx 460 768mb). In SLI both cards are loading at 50% so they appear to be doing SLI however the performance SUCKS. I have tried having the extra card do the AA but not sure how to do that in the Control Panel.
fuzonacid 3 months ago
@fuzonacid mostly correct , theres still a chance SL just doesnt like your PC and performs shity no matter what you got
NiranV 3 months ago
@NiranV
Performs very well depending on which viewer and when. I heard SL has tried a few different things and then changed nack for the moment and also the latest Nvidia drivers seem to have majotr problems with OpenGl with a lot of software including Adobe apps so a lot f people using those for income are not happy. Supposedly a fix in Jan. but it's been a good few months as an issue.
fuzonacid 3 months ago
@fuzonacid the driver issues have been fixed , atlast for my GTX 460 which was the worst in that case
NiranV 3 months ago
you actually lag.
KKOPPI 1 year ago
yes Crysis runs thousand times better..... this Video is Old, very old its from the original 2.0 Viewer which has a max FPS of 15 with Global Illumination (which actually looks like shit like you can see in this video) Kirstens S20 now runs with 25 FPS even with Global Illumination on and looks thousand times better
NiranV 1 year ago
Quick question? Does Crysis run better than second life?
scoutbr00 1 year ago
O.O thats awesome!!!
YiffMeHMM85 1 year ago
no, because i activated Global Illumination, wich halfed my FPS from 30 to 15, then set the Shadow Resolution to 5 times which causes 10 more FPS to fall
NiranV 1 year ago
@NiranV Hey niran i have 5970 and i7920 when i have everything max it just crashes on loading. when i disable RenderUsefbo it works. But then its no shadows. And light is kinda wierd ? I have my latest driver my os is win7 x64
arvid950 1 year ago
shadows sucks (too unnatural)
and some laggy? why? cause recording?
daysetx 1 year ago
i hate those 470´s and 480´s they´re crap , i wait until a 460 comes out and no i dont get a new card, because my card is more than enough for everything even vor Kirsten Viewer with Shadows , watch my other Videos to see it
NiranV 1 year ago
first, the "Lag" comes from Global Illumination which halfed my 30 FPS to 15, second i set the Shadow Resolution to 5 , which means they are 5 times more precise which caused my frames to drop to 5 , normally it doesnt lag so much, watch my other Videos and you´ll see it @LilBaby im using GTX 260
NiranV 1 year ago
@NiranV but the gtx 260 sucks either go get the ati 5970 or the new gtx 480 :)
tandis97 1 year ago
@NiranV
So is there any benefit to using a faster video card than a 260GTX? When you enable shadows etc. I read that most of the performance it is due to the cpu? So the faster the cpu the better? From what I have read and seen cpu speed is more important than the number of cores? And optimizing the speed of your overall system ie: multiple hard drives and ram disk.
fuzonacid 1 year ago
Woow! Its lagging for me! You should buy a new card!
dragkill36 1 year ago
What graphics CARDD? D;
LilBaby1366 1 year ago
pretty! one of kirstens viewers? i asked about the lag, and he said that he'll be working on the render code eventually! which means we might be able to use this as our default viewer at some point~ atm it's too laggy for me :(
IzzyBunneh 1 year ago
that looks great,
FurratVultee 2 years ago