Added: 5 years ago
From: yickster
Views: 62,363
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • FUCKING TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE cover. It makes me laugh to read all of the thick people on here who are leaving comment like: "It's HIS version, except it for what it is". FUCK NO! Fuck off, I don't give a shit that it's "his version', it'll NEVER be anywhere near the same quality as the original. Stick to writing jingles for TV commercials Jose!!

  • @tnsandland Who ever said it had to be as good as the original? It's just his take on a song, get over yourself.

  • I Love how this version sounds like a red indian tribal spell or something! its so magical :) love the song completely

  • Red Indian tribal spell? Dude what? Wow, people can be so arrogant without even knowing it.

  • i wasnt being arogant you prick i was just saying how the song sounded to me and why i liked it,

    and who goes and reads comments on songs that are 10 months old?? get a life

  • So the best you can come back with is that I reply on a 10 month old comment..

    First, what difference does it make if you said it 10 years ago or 10 minutes ago? You said it.

    Second. youtubes comments system is fucked up, sometimes they show year old and minute old comments, on the same page.

    So why don't you go study some history about the "Red Indians" get back to me, and tell me that this sounds like a tribal spell or whatever.

  • clearly there is no improving on what massive attack produced in the first place so all your arguments seem mundane irrelevant and rather pointless.... leave the covers for ur cheesy local coverbands!

  • this was a nice surprise to hear on house

  • I love his voice

  • To be fucking honest with all of you dick heads bitching out there, Massive Attacks is the most superior. Gonzalez' and Faukner's versions are both excellent for different reasons. Stop bickering over nothing.

    There's some immature people out there.

  • This is fucking youtube, what do you expect half the people here have nothing going on up in their head.

  • Quit arguing about which is better, instead just listen to the song.. Both songs are great, thats that.

  • Piss off cock head.

  • No, it doesn't have the crazy percussive fingerstyling of Newton. However, this guy's voice is ten times better, and it goes well with the otherwise simple yet effective accompaniment

  • newton faulkner doesnt come close to jose. newton faulkner is like a talented james blunt, really talented but cheese.

  • making it more 'individual' isn't necessarily a good thing. changing a song can take away what makes that song special.

    i personally think this is a good cover. he kept the feeling of the music intact. he didn't try anything outrageous. that said, he added very little extra depth. but that's just my opinion.

  • individuality? lol Newton's version is MUCH closer to the original than this, Jose put MUCH more of himself into this version.

    If you're going argue a point, don't pull information out of your ass joeyluvsrockmusic

  • i honestly dont like arguing, i really do like jose gonzales just not this cover he is very talented acoustically, but to say im pulling info out my ass doesnt make sense, newton combines a unique fingerstyle guitaring technique combine with using his own guitar as percussion plus singing at the same time believe me is alot harder and more creative then jose's technique.. now heartbeats that was an awesome cover

  • I wasn't talking about which was technically harder to perform. You used the work individuality as an argument, which is what I responded to. Newton's cover is clearly much closer to the original, thus, it's less of himself. He is playing the same notes, but using a different medium, however Jose has changed things. It is not more creative to cover a song while playing the same notes yet using another instrument/medium at all. There is also much less risk.

  • love this guy!

  • Beautifull song. I brought his album, in our nature the other day. Its really nice to listen to.

  • Is this from the Independent Armchair gig in Obs?

  • great...but where the fuck is he?j

  • yeah it's very cool.

  • what an awesome version. his earthy vocals is a direct contrast to liz fraser's ethereal vocals!

  • No you're wrong. You are poop. And your name is perfect for you.

  • You are a poop.

  • well the recording is weak so that does not help

  • You are correct there.

  • totally agree.

    it's a good version, though.

  • damn... i love massive attack... but this guy made some great work!!

    I think I prefer this version

  • Jose Gonzalez? I thought he was a reliever for the Braves

  • Awesome!!!!

  • what a fucking legend, jose gonzales rules and this is better than the massive attack version

  • I guess you're a Retard boy from Mongolia.

  • ha, i dont think so. he's good nd all, but frasers voice is absolutely magical. no comparison, sorry

  • bing!

    hahahahahahahaha

  • just saw him lastnight at the fillmore SF. he did this cover at the very end.

    i was blown away.

    jose is amazing :)

  • the version of the knife is the original

  • actually this is a massive attack cover

  • Actually they were talking about the other song.

  • I love his song "heartbeats"... thats so good. have you heard the knifes version of it? it`s cool..

  • jose gonzalez is amazing, and this cover is amazing.

    love massive attack.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more