Philosophy: On What There Is W.V. Quine, Part I

[sirclarkroberts]

Slow the fuuuckk down... This isn't easy to conceptualize.

[analyticaa]

@Myushu Ah! I thought when you referred to 'this post' your referent was this Youtube post, since your comment didn't include '@stevestevejam'.

[namesameasu]

Where's part II?

[QMPhilosophe]

This is a SEMINAL essay in 20th Century Philosophy by one of the great analytic philosophers of our time. How can anyone mistake this for gibberish spit out of the Postmodern Essay Generator? Ahhh.....how the cloak of anonymity provides a forum for nitwits and cretins.

[analyticaa]

@Myushu You should probably look up Quine (since it is obvious you never have, nor will read his actual work) so that you won't embarrass yourself in the future.

[stevestevejam]

Sartre Diatribe, Lockean Afflictions. And Paramendes rather than Platonic, Russel rather than Wittgenstein or Heidegger, the confusion as a notion is a confusion of the self, the confusion which refracts the strong hold to traditional ethics, and supplemented views of story telling.