Added: 4 years ago
From: dongdong2012
Views: 47,806
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (179)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ... It is NOT a sacrifice

  • The rcc says "Christ...commanded that his bloody sacrifice on the Cross should be daily renewed by an unbloody sacrifice of his body and blood in the Mass under the simple elements of bread and wine." (The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 10, Pg. 13, Article: "Mass, Sacrifice of"). Jesus never made such a command. If you'll check the references in Matthew 26 and I Corinthians 11, you'll see for yourself that the Lord's Supper is a MEMORIAL and a SHOWING of Christ's death until He comes again...

  • @kiwichristian2009

    Before u give ur "opinion" again, you should read what is a "memorial sacrifice" in the Old testament (Levitic). And then, you should ask yourself why are you saved if His sacrifice ended 2000 years ago.? You propably not even know what is a sacrifice. You think "killing" Jesus was "the Sacrifice" when the Truth is that A SACRIFICE is blood offered to God. That´s what Jesus is doing right now so you and I can still be saved 2000 years later

    Go and read some more

    Blesses

  • Cardinal Newman, in his book, "The Development of the Christian Religion," admits that ... "Temples, incense, oil lamps, votive offerings, holy water, holidays and season of devotions, processions, blessing of fields, sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure (of priests and monks and nuns), images ... are ALL of pagan origin..." (Page 359).

  • Did Jesus says we cannot receive him in our hands? Pls read the bible the last supper his disciples received him in their hands

  • @trinity93256 It's not in the Bible. It's simply out of respect and recognition that we are not worthy enough to even touch him. The Host in the palm is not a sin, but it is ALWAYS preferable on the tongue, as it has been done for 2000 years.

  • @Killermuffin1 The word Bible is not in the Bible, neither is the Holy Trinity, and BTW what about the word the fundementalists would have us believe...The Rapture? Can't be found anywhere in the Bible. Jesus did NOT say a Memorial, rather He said" Do it in memory of me" , two different words, two different concepts.

  • I don't know how if you study history and the reformation by Martin Luther you could deny the Apostolic Catholic Church as the true church! A church created by Christ.

  • Totally real. Praise Jesus! He is King, and all you who don't believe, I pray for you. I am sorry you don't believe. You who judges without knowing anything. You will one day see your faults. Don't worry. We will ALL be judged. God bless you :)

  • FAKE YOU HAHAHAHAHAH

  • Exodus 20:4...."Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth." 

  • @johnthreesixteen316 Context makes all the difference in understanding.

  • @johnthreesixteen316 Ezekiel 41:17-18 "To the space above the door even to the inner room and on the outside and on all the walls round about in the innger room and the nave were "carved likenesses of Cherubim and palm trees, a palm tree between cherub and cherub, every cherub had two faces"

    1 Kinga 6:29 He carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubim and palm trees and open flowers

  • @johnthreesixteen316

    I imagine you have a problem with the Ark then, or David praying, kneeling, and sacrificing before it? Perhaps with Moses and the seraphim lifted high? Maybe you would also disagree with anyone who has "graven images" of their relatives on their walls? The Bible is full of symbolism, Christianity has been taught from it to the illiterate, your fundamental interpretation is so full of problems. Pax Christi, may your eyes be opened.

  • @LordHaveMercy956 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image

  • @johnthreesixteen316

    I'm sorry, your fallible interpretation is hindering your ability to answer questions. Try again next time, Pax Christi.

  • i believe

  • Yeah! Intelligent response! Not!

  • Yeah! crackers!

  • I just checked the King James Version, and funnily enough, His disciples - who refused to believe what He was saying about His Body and Blood - left on chapter/verse 6:66...Just thought I'd share that for everyone...Coincidence...?

  • @latinmasslover

    with respect to your observation about john 6:66: WOW!

    I noticed after seeing your comment that there is no other 6:66 in the Gospels-- there is no corresponding reference in Matthew, Mark, or Luke, so the 6:66 in John stands out all the more as a sign that merits prayer and contemplation in the Spirit. In spite of all ecumenical desires, is it perhaps that protestantism at heart is in the grips of a spirit of rebellion against the authority that is God and God's Christ?

  • @latinmasslover antichrists left Jesus! Are you gonna do the same?

  • @JezusSlave Is the question directed at me? That was the whole point I was making in quoting John 6.

  • Just as Cain vainly tried to impress God with the works of his hands, so do Catholics try to impress God with their good works and ceremonialism. Catholicism is a damnable lie that has been in the world since Cain. God will smash the Catholic Whore with His judgments.

  • Comment removed

  • @kiwichristian2009 Where does the Bible say WHY Cain's sacrifice was not accepted? If you read the Scripture without trying to corrupt them, you would have noticed that the blood sacrifice of Abel (compare with the Sacrifice of the Mass) was accepted whereas the non-blood sacrifice, the sacrifice of Cain - the "fruit" of the earth (compare to Protestant bread and juice) was not accepted.

  • What a shock. Ask an anti-Catholic to back up an accusation and...*silence*

  • @latinmasslover Good job i am not anti-catholic, then! :)

  • @kiwichristian2009 How do you figure that? Because you AGAIN get off topic and avoid issues you have no defense for? You're a typical anti-Catholic.

  • @kiwichristian2009 Coming back to answer things only AFTER someone calls you on it just proves their point.

  • Obviously Jesus words, "this is my body" should be taken symbolically because it falls within a long list of symbolic statements Christ said: "I am the bread," (John 6:41), "I am the vine," (John 15:5), "I am the door," (John 10:7,9), "I am the good shepherd,"(John 10:11,12), "You are the world the salt, (Matthew 5:13), "You are the light of the world the salt, (Matthew 5:14)

  • @kiwichristian2009 Read John 6 in context. The people took Him literally here, and not in other places where He was in fact speaking figuratively. His first disciples left Him because "this is a hard saying, who can accept it?" You are no different. You refuse to believe Christ, His Word, and thus you corrupt the Scriptures to suit your fance, as Peter warns of in the Bible as well.

  • @latinmasslover My friend, funny how you tell me to read something "in context", when you and other catholics completely take Matthew 16:18 out of context. Before removing a splinter in my eye, make sure you remove that log out of yours. I believe Christ 100%. Nowhere did He establish the roman catholic "church" or indeed a religion. Remember, here is NO evidence for the Papacy from Peter himself.

  • @kiwichristian2009 Liars refuse to address truth by changing the subject.

  • Why does the Eucharist turn into the heart of a baby for all to see I wonder? How many beautiful babies have been killed by the abomination of abortion? about 35 million to date after Roe vs Wade in the U.S. alone. More persons killed by abortion than by all the wars in the history of mankind.

  • @proudmomoffive It doesnt turn into anything. It is just typical catholic anti-Christian fairytales.

  • Religion is not this.

    Religion is love and freedom.

  • Why was she crying?

    And was that supposed to be blood?

  • then you belive jesus is a literal lamb in haven going baaa baa baa o ok

  • then you said jesus said drink blood is literal .

    im sorry but if you think the bible is literal interpretations of scriptures are easily refutable scientifically and theologically then why would you take jesus word as literal your a fool son

  • No its not the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the World it is a piece of mass produced bland tasting sun waffers. Jesus never used round cakes this came out of paganism of the solar deity. He use real bread broken into little pieces and said eat this bread. this is my body broken for you, where did he change it to actual flesh. it might be interesting to note that in the OT meat offerings were of bread not animal flesh He knew it was bread and he knew the wine was wine

  • holy scriptures says dont eat anything with blood still in it and dont drink blood the rcc says we dont care what the bible says drink jesus blood wow which should i belive ? ill belive the bible not man

  • and in the Bible, Christ commands us to eat His Flesh and drink His Blood. End of story. Look at the beliefs of the early Church, they all acknowledge the truth of that statement. read Ignatius of Antioch, disciple of John the Apostle.

  • Wow a catholic quoting the bible image that why dont you read the rest of the chapter

    Jhn 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life.

    Its quit obvious when jesus said drink my blood he was not contradicting the new and old testament that said do not drink blood your rcc just dont believe the bible thats why they hate sola scriptoria because it proves them wrong

  • um, the rest of the chapter proves the Catholic position right. His disciples left Him because they took Him literally. He never explained what was "really" meant by those words, which means they understood Him perfectly.

    you're last comment is amusing. just out of curiousity, where does the Bible teach sola scriptura? the Church doesn't believe it because the Bible doesn't teach it.

  • The holy scriptures do not lie Jesus does not lie nether does it contradict its self when the word of god says dont drink blood it means dont drink blood the Jesus says drink my blood he has to me it spiritually .

    You ether believe the words of god himself or mans traditions its your choice . When your consider Jesus said the words I speck are spiritual proves he was not talking of cannibalism

  • Comment removed

  • you're not answering my question.

    where does the Bible teach sola scriptura?

    i'll throw another out. where in the Bible does Christ say to read the Scriptures?

    it's interesting how you have the nerve to accuse us of following "traditions of man" when you can't even back up your fundametal belief with His words. your belief goes back to Martin Luther. A man.

  • Word means in greek logos

    1) of speech

    a) a word, uttered by a living voice, embodies a conception or idea

    b) what someone has said

    1) a word

    2) the sayings of God

    3) decree, mandate or order

    4) of the moral precepts given by God

    We get the word logo from it

    As you can see the bible is the written word logos that Jesus said

  • .1Pe 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto youEph 5:26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word

    i have over 20 of these do you need more

  • Comment removed

  • @latinmasslover "Now these things, brethren, I have figuratively applied to myself and Apollos for your sakes, so that in us you may learn not to exceed what is written, so that no one of you will become arrogant in behalf of one against the other." 1 Corinthians 4:6

  • @kiwichristian2009 1 Corinthians 4:6 makes no reference to the Scriptures, but to what is written. As the Church relies on many things that were written and not a few select books, you really have no defense with this verse.

  • @latinmasslover Matthew 4:1-11. Three times Jesus was tempted by the Devil and each time Jesus replied exactly the same three dangerous words that defeated the Devil: "IT IS WRITTEN" Read it for yourself! If any one could have used oral tradition, it was Jesus, yet he chose the only safe and sure way to defeat Satan: Scripture. We just wish that the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches held scripture alone in the same high regard!

  • @kiwichristian2009 Not really. Satan tried to corrupt the Scripture, so Christ countered it by putting it in context. Your point is once again moot.

  • @latinmasslover Paul did not say, "The things are to teach you not to exceed my oral teachings." Instead the emphasis is on showing the supremacy of scripture over oral tradition. What makes this even more powerful, is the fact that in 54 AD, only a few of the New Testament books were written, yet the church was still warned to abide within the scripture she had

  • @kiwichristian2009 Where in the Bible was the Church warned of this? Paul says to adhere to the spoken and written word, and no where in the Bible does it say that your one passage overrides several references that counter your modern interpretation. You're again taking the Scriptures out of context.

  • wow are you for real or making fun of rcc. because the Bible doesn't teach it. Are you kidding me . Or are you smoking crack . The bible dont say nothing of the teachings of mary and you say nothing of that. how about kissing a popes ring where in the world is chapter and verse for that

  • @latinmasslover Must Christ be continually sacrificed in the mass, or was His blood sacrifice on the cross 100% sufficient to pay for all our sins for ever? In John19:30 Jesus said, "IT IS FINISHED", which in the Greek is "Tetelestai" meaning "to make an END, to ACCOMPLISH, to COMPLETE something, not mearly to end it, but to bring it to perfection or its intended goal."

    

  • @kiwichristian2009 Is God bound by time? Learn what the CHURCH says the Mass is, not what some ignorant bigot says it is.

  • Judas was a disciple of Jesus him self ,so what do I care about people writing things that go agents the bible 7 letters to the 7 (not one) churches one of the churches where church of Satan 2000 yrs later its getting worst

  • 2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth .you being cathlic night not know the word here means bible

  • @beingther The problem with you fundamentalists or whoever you are is that sometimes you take the Bible literally and sometimes you take it symbolically depending on how it suits your agenda. JESUS was clear and insisted on eating his body and drinking his blood like in no other text, if you cannot swallow that do not claim that this is not what Jesus meant. Fundamentalists literal interpretations of scriptures are easily refutable scientifically and theologically. So go preach somewhere else.

  • Bible literally and sometimes you take it symbolically depending on how it suits your agenda

    are you smoken crack or what your taking the bible literaly you said Fundamentalists literal interpretations of scriptures are easily refutable scientifically and theologically but you say dink jesus blood ltleraly your a nut son and a biget

  • This is what Jesus SAY you idiot, Denial can go a long way with subjective minds! 2000 years Christians believed in that who are YOU and your born again fake preachers to criticize that.

  • o im sorry you are on crack i thought you where just crazy.

    look you said you take the Bible literally and sometimes you take it symbolically depending on how it suits your agenda .then you said literal interpretations of scriptures are easily refutable scientifically and theologically

  • If you understand LOGIC you would get it. I am referring to Born again attitutude: They claim that scriptures should be interpreted literally ALWAYS ( I do not agree with that so I do not have to prove to you anything) so Igave an example where Born again DO NOT TAKE THE TEXT literally. You were very weak in math I imagine.

  • so you always take it litteraly do

    you

  • NO I DONT but Born again CLAIM they do

  • so you dont take the bible literaly really is that what your saying o then jesus was not a literal person that died on a cross o ok i got it its not at all literal o ok

  • your doing exatly what your saying these born agen people do quit smocking dope and take to me when your sober k

  • You are the BIGGEST IDIOT I have met on the net so far and I have met many, learn how to speak then learn how to think. NO NEED TO TALK (take!!!) TO YOU AGAIN.

  • Comment removed

  • lol Its always personal attacks when you have nothing to back up your silly theology . your not the BIGGEST IDIOT i have talked to, your just a Average Kool-Aid drinking brainwashed catholic full of hate and totally deceived

  • @beingther Bible Clealry mentions that Jesus Pbuh Was not crucified it was a lie about him ...read ur book n see how ur saints and pope have astrayed u from Reality !! they are misleading people

  • i dont know how Jesus Pbuh Was but jesus christ was crucified and im not rc

  • What religion do u follow ?Omg when i am saying that it in the bible that he wasnot crucified ! then my dear I can proof u with the verses ! i need ur email add I wil mail u in detail .....pls let me knw what do u follow ?

  • I dont fallow religion I study the bible kjv with the strongs concordance

    But I pray that the holy spirit leads me to all truth before I study . you dont need my email just send me a personal message

  • only god know who a saint is not me im not a cathlic

  • @fyunuskhan : do u even know anything about the bible???? wat a joke...read what u r talking about before declaring something as stupid as this in public!

  • @atuatman Jesus is giving Himself to them in the Eucharist. It's been done for 2,000 years. Koreans are faithful people, not like Europeans and Americans. He is manifesting Himself to those people for faith reasons. You wouldn't understand b/c you know nothing about it. These are holy people. They suffer a lot in Korea. This is a consolation for them.

  • your right im not good at math

    but i know numbers in the bible like 1=god2=unity3=Perfect witness 4=world wide5 = grace and ministry 10 =law on and on

  • @latinmasslover In John chapter 6 Christ is speaking about eating His flesh. Then He goes on to explain what He meant....."63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." He is clearly speaking figuratively when he says to 'eat His body and drink His blood'. In JN 6:63 He even told us the words are SPIRITUAL! Jesus SAID the words are SPIRITUAL the FLESH profits NOTHING!

  • Its amazing the way a human mind will deceive its self. if they want to believe a lie .

    They look for proof to over come there dough no matter who perverse it is .

    I can prove to you from the bible ,that satan is god if you really want to believe it .man can and does believe all kinds of foolishness

  • False signs and lying wonders, as a Christian i find this completly repugnant. and it is off the devil and not God. But these gullible sheep. the blessed virgin mary was there. Another false sign and lying wonder.

  • Its funny that bread turned to blood I thought it was the wine turned to blood so what is the point of this video it goes agenst what they believe

  • as the crucified Christ, there is blood in the body as well. It confirms not denies the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist. He said to eat his body and drink his blood. In the true since of bread 'turning' to blood is inconsistent as the body itself is broken and his blood shed for all so that all may come to believe in Him.

    God bless you.

  • Several Problems with what your saying about the flesh having blood in it

    First the bible says dont eat flesh with blood in it another is 1Cr 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

  • Act 15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, so you take mans techings over gods word o ok

  • Most of the pilgrims usually keep their own cameras and cellphones. Of course there are photagraphers to take records to report to the Catholic Church.

  • I am a Catholic. There's no such thing as drama... The holy mass is very sacred for us Catholics. It is the highest form of prayer. The miracle is true. Scientist and researchers proved that the eucharist really made from human flesh, comes from "cardium muscle" or heart muscle... There are a lot of Eucharistic miracles all over the world and thousands proved it was real. Jesus Christ is truly present in the Eucharist. It is in the BIble.

  • im so sad for you if all you have as the highest form of prayer is the mass .

    if you understud you are the temple of the holy ghost you could have true comunnun

  • I am a Catholic. There's no such thing as drama... The holy mass is very sacred for us Catholics. It is the highest form of prayer. The miracle is true. Scientist and researchers proved that the eucharist really made from human flesh, comes from "cardium muscle" or heart muscle... There are a lot of Eucharistic miracles all over the world and thousands proved it was real.

  • @Namrochi1 Show me this proof, please. For my part, i remind you that Christ said His words were SPIRITUAL, not literal!

  • Comment removed

  • @kiwichristian2009 Where exactly does Christ say that His words are not literal? "Spiritual" doesn't mean "ignore everything I just said and will continue to say." His words are life, as He also said. You can obey Him and say "I don't understand, but I trust" or you can say "Your word isn't good enough." His followers left Him because they would not accept what He taught. His Apostles didn't understand HOW He could be saying what He did, but they nevertheless accepted it.

  • Catholicism in England and France started out from lies from scamming priests in a church that was more of a power craving government.

  • this crap undermines the Church. people snapping pics as she sticks out her tongue for them.

    thanks for turning the eucharist into a circus side show.

  • Even in Jesus' time there were those who walked amid the circus acts. However, even Christ performed miracles within crowds. Thinking on it seriously, this particular event may actually call people to Christ and those who do not believe may come to believe. Pray on this and let your heart be not hardened.

  • I don't quite agree of what they're doing.

    Eucharist is a sacred ceremony, but there are many reporters, photographers who come not for God, but special working for media.

    Luke 4:12 "..Do not put the Lord your God to the test"!!

  • i don't agree with it either, it's way too much ritual and like a cult what they're doing...

  • Jesus ordered this in the Bible.

  • yeah what a miracle...amazing what saliva, food coloring, and a little bad acting can do :D

  • Those miracles have too many photos, videos, samples, test reports, witnesses all over the world, especially in Korea. So at least it is very clear that the woman did not bite her tongue.

  • Catholic church has some hundreds of such miracles approved by

    the Church and continued perpetually since its history.

  • the catholic church is nothing more than a satanist religion. the pope is the antichrist and the vatican is the biggest mafia in the world. i spit on the pope and everyone who prays to the pope. he is nothing more than a idol which every catholic thinks he is holy and bow down to him. FUCK THE POPE

  • @insanedf Amen, apart from the swearing. The Pope, is, of course, an Antichrist, while the religious machinery of the Vatican itself is the Whore of Babylon (as it derives its rituals and symbolism from the Babylonian religion of the seductive Semiramis). The Beast is the political structure of the so called "Holy Roman Empire of the Vatican, which will eventually amalgamate into a One World Religion and Government.

  • The woman bit her tongue... what miracle??

    Transubstantiation means just that - the body and blood of Christ exist in this world in the form of the Host. It's not a pretense, the bread is not just a "disguise." The bread IS the Body of Christ, according to the classic doctrine by Aquinas... therefore, there is simply no room for this sort of hokey "miracle."

  • I'll pray for you.

  • @JKrten1 Transubstantiation is a false doctrine because Jesus is not a liar: In Mt 26:29 after Jesus had said, "this is my blood" and prayed, he still referred to the contents as, "fruit of the vine". If transubstantiation of the juice into blood had occurred, as both Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches say it was at this time, then Jesus would never have referred to it as "fruit of the vine' but rather "blood".

  • @kiwichristian2009 You have to understand that Jesus spoke in parables - in one of them he spoke of the Fruit of the Vine in reference to Himself as the Vine, we Christians as the fruit. So in calling the contents of the cup that, he almost certainly didn't mean to merely point out that wine is made out of grapes. Anyway, I'm Anglican - I believe in the Real Presence, but NOT "transubstantiation" per se. Still, I take Jesus seriously when he says, "This is my blood."

  • @JKrten1 My friend. When Christ said to eat His body and drink His blood He was speaking figuratively, not literally. The Book of John also says "unless a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God." Does this mean we need to be pushed out of our mother's womb again? Of course not. That would be impossible. Christ offered His body and blood on the cross for us. He wants us to accept His body and blood sacrifice for the atonement of our sins. Christ also said He was a door.

  • @kiwichristian2009 If you read what you quote, Christ explains what He meant by being born again. He did not explain an alternate meaning in John 6, precisely because there was NO alternate meaning. His followers knew when He was speaking literally and when He was not, hence they LEFT HIM when He said "eat My Flesh and drink My Blood" but made no issue when He said that He was the "gate" or the "door" or the "vine".

  • i got scared

  • There is something weird about this miracle. Do not get me wrong, I am a believer and I believe in miracles, but this miracle is too dramatic, attention-seeking etc..It is supernatural in origin, no doubt about that, but where is it coming from, that is the question! It is possible that I am wrong, and may God forgive me if I am, but I think this could be the work of the evil one. Well Vatican will investigate this and they will tell us what kind of a miracle this is.

  • They also said Jesus cast out demon by the power of Beezebul

  • ??????

  • Not yet , but in the preocess of investigation by a bureau of Vatican.

  • Has this miracle been approved by the Church yet?

  • What a powerful testament because it is not from men but from God.

  • John 6:33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.

    The Bread He speaks of ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT be FLESH since he did not bring His Flesh with Him from Heaven!

    Try substituting the word FLESH in this verse. That is HERESY

    Word became FLESH

    Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, MADE OF A WOMAN

    Of the SEED of a woman Gen 3:15

  • and many lulz were had.

  • God did it for the lulz.

  • a signs of the coming of the lord

    praise god!

  • Rev.Father Sun who is witnessed the Euchraistic miracle and on this video visited naju again on Nov 24,2008 with his 34 companions and he celebrated the Mass for pilgrims. he firmly believed that the Naju Mary's signs on Naju

  • It would have been more convincing if the camera hadn't cut away just before the "miracle" happens.

  • oh Holy God...Praise Lord..U r My Saviour N Soul..Thank God...

  • oh whenever I doubt God's existence I just read up and watch Eucharistic Miracles. This is buetifull

  • sono cattolico ma questo mi impressiona..

  • "I am the living Bread that came down from heaven :whoever eats this bread will live forever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world."

    "Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life , and I will raise him on the last day. For My flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink l."

    Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him."

  • @teresasfsol The very record of historically, (Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Cyprian and Hippolytus) which the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches love to quote as authority, proves that before 200 AD, the church viewed the bread and juice as symbols. Conversely, the earliest historical hint of transubstantiation was in the 4th century.

  • @kiwichristian2009 Hmm, so what do you have to say of the writings before 200 AD that say that the bread and wine become the Body and Blood of Christ?

  • @teresasfsol Obviously Jesus words, "this is my body" should be taken symbolically because it falls within a long list of symbolic statements Christ said: "I am the bread," (John 6:41), "I am the vine," (John 15:5), "I am the door," (John 10:7,9), "I am the good shepherd,"(John 10:11,12), "You are the world the salt, (Matthew 5:13), "You are the light of the world. (Matthew 5:14)

  • Comment removed

  • @kiwichristian2009 The more you talk the more you show yourself to be dishonest...I'm starting to wonder if you're in fact a Catholic who's trying to make Protestants look bad rather than a Protestant trying to make the Church look unbiblical... This issue of symbolism has already been addressed and you have NOT countered it.

  • @latinmasslover In what way am i dishonest?

  • @kiwichristian2009 John 6 makes it more than obvious that He wasn't speaking symbolically, and I already said why that was and explained (as the Scriptures already explained) how it differentiated from the symbolisms He used. You never countered the Scripture on that, but continue to use an argument that doesn't suffice in order to prove an untruth.

  • what a miracle!

    and so useful!

    much more important then making hurricanes less windy.

  • wonderful... this is amazing!

  • Incredible! Wonderful Jesus is alive today. He is present in The Blessed |Eucharist. Jesus is with us till the end of time as He promised long ago.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Welldone and God bless †

  • @benaggreyfynn In John chapter 6 Christ is speaking about eating His flesh. Then He goes on to explain what He meant....."63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." He is clearly speaking figuratively when he says to 'eat His body and drink His blood'.

  • @kiwichristian2009 Your response to teresa. and benag. are perfect examples of why I called you dishonest. Try reading ALL of John 6, read the context of the situation, and you will see how He was in fact speaking literally - and His disciples knew it. The ones that accepted it stayed with Him, the ones that did not left Him.

  • look at that statue of mary.... that was disgusting.

  • @lithaine That's because that's all they are.

  • its cool how theyre showing all the miracles, but if you need this to actually start to believe, than shame on you. I don't know the exact quote in the bible but it said something like -blessed are those who believe and did not see, jesus said that after one of his disciples did not believe he had resurected, and came running to check the holes on jesus. Oh yeah, and also, let the woman close her mouth and pray for god sakes... this became like a media day, and i dont like that...

  • do u know wats wierd my nickname is naju

  • Those who believe in God and can not believe the supernatural power and still wish to be his children.

  • People must understand that God is only showing his amazing mercy and love through this miracles. Thats why you hear priest shouting all the time "Jesus is our savior". Its because he just realized the Truth....in that moment you cannot do nothing else but only glorify Jesus Christ, cuz you just realize how much He loves us.

  • but this here is "NAJU JULIA IS OUR SAVIOR", check yur ears

  • @gamerjinho But our only savior is JESUS!

  • @kiwichristian2009 Catholicism doesn't deny this.

  • @latinmasslover "Sinners receive pardon by the intercession of Mary alone." St. John Chrysostom. "All those who seek Mary’s protection will be saved for all eternity." Pope Benedict XV.For God has committed to Mary the treasury of all good things, in order that everyone may know that through her are obtained every hope, every grace, and all salvation. For this is his will, that we obtain everything through Mary.” - Pope Pius XII . Dont forget the satanic visions that say she can save you.

  • @kiwichristian2009 What's your point? I didn't see one quoted statement saying that Mary is the Savior, only that the Lord uses her to bring souls to Him. By the way, care to quote the letters where you got these so that they may be read in context?

  • @latinmasslover "through her are obtained every hope, every grace, and all salvation." This is a lie. We receive all salvation through JESUS CHRIST ALONE. No mention EVER in the Bible does it suggest that we need any other intermediatry person.