This is disgraceful and rep. frank should be ashamed of his comments. Have some respect for a sitting supreme court justice. What an absolute disgrace. How did this guy get elected? Fucking faggot.
@woppy42 Gag on u??!!!! Hell, If I wanted to smoke a cigarette I'd buy a pack of marlboro's. Don't make me laugh. As far as fucking me... puhlease. You're really brave behind a keyboard. Come down to dallas and I'll show you what a longhorn is for... And I promise you won't enjoy it.
@woppy42 How original! I hope u didn't strain your pea brain with that one but if thats one of your fantasies then more power to you. Just don't expect me to support your marriage request to Steve. *Gag Gag*
Excuse me, but WHY DIDN'T ANYONE TELL ME that there was a news network dedicated to the gays?! It's like a FOX News for for the gay crowd! But in all seriousness, I'm happy for them.
IF scalia is a homophobe then we need someone like that on the Supreme court to counter the Intelligephobe's everywhere else. Barney Frank is the most arrogant, selfish mafo out there. I'd take a baseball bat to him, rangel , reid and pelosi any day of the week! The fact that these people got "reelected" speaks volumes to the level of electorate corruption that only seems to be a problem when a republican gets elected.
What a ridiculous, powerful claim, and reporters don't even give it a follow up. Frank had more to do with the financial crisis than anyone, lets get him out of Congress!
@anikinippon Would it bother you if he was? Most people who like Antonin Scalia would be happy to know he's a homophobe. May want to better reconcile your conflicting beliefs. Here's a fun little task - try to find anything that would support your theory that he "is not a homophobe" and, if you not only can't (and actually find more evidence that he is), maybe rethink your thoughts about him.
@strweed Absence of evidence in not a strength of an argument, it's a weakness. It's on a legal basis that he makes his legal opinions, not from bias and prejudice.
Just because it's an anti-incumbent year that doesn't mean there all bad. It's just a few incumbents that have screwed up. I always keep in touch with my Rep. and try to see them every few months. You should try the same because to call them all scumbags isn't right, because it is only a few of them that fucked up.
I'm from the San Francisco Bay Area. Population is really big here. And, yes I met my Rep when I was 10 years old and still know her today, my father was a huge supporter and contributer. I've always gotten a response from my Rep. and it seems that in your case your Rep. is just impotent. If your Rep continues with this path then I guess this Rep. isn't representing you and vote them out. Just curious what political party or affiliation does your Rep. belong too if at all?
You've got it all wrong to assume what your saying. I was introduced to my Rep. by my father. I became involved and active in supporting my Rep. in High School by doing everything from calling up potential voters to creating a website to gain more votes. Don't be so quick to judge because it becomes ludicrous to make an assessment about me when you don't have any idea how much time and effort I placed in helping my Rep. get re-elected.
Your either oblivious or certainly stupid. Your assuming because of my fathers connection I have the luxury of knowing my Rep. Anyone can get to know their Rep. as long as they care. Now it's not my fault that you have a shitty Rep. Vote them out! Now going on to make comments on naivety and sheltered behavior when you don't know the other person is a dangerous attitude. Don't be a prick and go on to state that you know the TRUTH because you don't know shit!
Your two messages tell me your more frustrated than I thought, wow not enough characters to write about. Damn your Rep. is that bad huh? My Rep. is the shit that's why I voted for her, too bad we can't all have that luxury. I just finished a year at my school of education and I'm also a Beaver but can't recall our mutual school being known for politics and law. So, forgive me if I have doubts about your presence at our mutual school. And, UT Grad what a crook.
Bullshit...you don't even know where Caltech is located. Give me Dabney Houses significant motto and Ricketts House sick ass slogan. BTW what was your house if at all.
Your dead wrong as to what house I belonged to at Caltech. What house did you belong too? I'm also curious if you knew whom were our biggest rivals as a learning institution at Caltech were?... because anybody who attended knows those fuckers. Ohh....and by the way I will not be returning to Caltech this year because because I will be pursuing other opportunities at Cal this upcoming fall. Better grad school then your gay UT.
Left Caltech because of a change in major. And, you still haven't told me anything about your supposed Caltech experience. Come on give me at least our rivals and do it to convince me. And, Jonas Zmuidzinas was my intro to Physics instructor by the way.
Stop lying through your ass. I rarely ever went to Dabney house even though it was really nice so I couldn't comment on your mural if it was even there. So, once again who was our rival school? Answer me that because you're not convincing anyone. BTW what was your major there because clearly you didn't major in politics at Caltech.
BTW loser I was a Flem (Fleming House). And, really if you truly went to Caltech anyone can tell MIT is our rival, but a real student would know about our rocky relationship with our other school. Give you a hint they're much more local then MIT.
No shit MIT is Caltech's rival but quick question why did it take you so long to respond to this? This is because you're bullshitting me loser. MIT should of been the first thing that came to mind, there really is no other that comes to mind. Stop looking up info of Caltech and stop being a prick. I choose to attend Cal because Caltech didn't have my major and that's why I left fool.
Same-Sex marriage and other homosexual policies are a state issue. The United States Constitution does not say anything about it. Advancement of the homosexual agenda has never been able to pass through the democratic process. That is why advocates of homosexual policies try to use people like Barney Frank in the federal government and the state courts to obtain what they never will through elections.
Scalia might be a social conservative, but that does not make him a homophobe. I have gay friends who know I don't support gay marriage.
The reason Scalia and probably Thomas would not strike down the Defense of Marriage Act however, is that they are originalists who interpret the constitution as it is. Since there is no Right to Marriage in the Constitution, they leave it up to Congress. They're not saying "No gay marriage." They're saying "let it come democratically."
Having a job is not a right, but back to my main point which was that being against equal rights does classify someone as a bigot. What do you think a bigot is? I'm tired of conservatives whining about name-calling it's getting old. I thought you guys weren't politically correct.
People wake up the gay subject isnt a fed. issue its a local goverment issue that we the people vote on and it will pass or fail....But i guess these a-holes have nothing to talk about ...
If you disagree, they call you names: racist, homophobe, hatemonger, redneck....
The democrats are the party of social division.
Barney Frank has been horrible for this country. He is one of the MAIN reasons for the economic collapse. If he had done his job (regulation on the lenders) rather than push his ideology, the US wouldn't have had to go through the 2008/9 the economic mess.
barney fag is just mad because scalia doesn't buy into the homosexual agenda, scalia is for civil liberties (he voted to strike down flag burning law, defends jury trial rights vigorously etc) however scalia recognizes that the constitution says nothing in defense of homosexuality, and that there are correct historical, medical and moral reasons for opposing homosexuality, that doesn't make you a bigot
the Constitution also says what the course of action should be if a runaway slave was captured...should we use those "insights" today as well?? the point you IDIOT is that a document written over 200 years ago cannot possibly speak to every concern of a 21st century society!! that is why judges should exercise COMMON SENSE and not mask their bigotry, racism with bullshit legal talk. if you're worried about medical and moral issues with homosexuality, then DON'T HAVE GAY SEX!!!
That is incorrect. We amended the Constitution to remove that language.
And you are correct inasmuch as there are certain concerns that the framers could not have foreseen. This is why we have a legislature. If you want a constitutional right to homosexual conduct, marriage, and the like, pass a law or amend the Constitution.
The Constitution does no such thing as we have amended it.
If you feel that the document does not speak to our current concerns, you have the option to attempt to amend it.
Until you do so, the Constitution means exactly what the current text says. Judges ought to be faithful to that literal text, even if you find the results repulsive. For those things the Constitution does not deal with, the judiciary ought to law the duly elected legislature and individual states do their jobs.
Your legal reasoning on (the medical and moral are more complex), but please don't stoop to Frank's level of name calling. He does it because he has no argument and is filled with hate. Your actual argument is not one of a bigot, but the "Barney Fag" comment gives the impression that you are. You articulated a rational argument, and hopefully are not filled with hate, but the name calling destroys the credibility of your comments and undermines rational discourse.
Scalia is for civil liberies and yet voted to deny trials to people on American soil without any reason? That makes no since.
There are no medical reasons to oppose homosexuality(no major medical association says there is), each person should decide what's moral, not the government, and slavery is also historically fine so it that right?
Medical reasons for opposing homosexuality? Is that why the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychoanalytic Society all support gay marriage?
Nice try. Don't waste my time again with your sub-human IQ.
2. I did not say that any major medical associations support gay marriage. However, I am saying that they are saying that their is no medical reason to oppose it.
You have yet to respond to any of my points, and you seem to use name calling instead.
Serves them right. Barney Frank is not a licensed financial advisor. People take tips from friends and family, then blame financial companies when they lose money. Fuck em all.
@dortmundpls didn't frank say that like 4 years be4 freddie mac started having serious problems? it's not like he said it a week or a month b4 they started having serious problems.
@dortmundpls He didn't say that retard. Also GUESS who was in the majority at that time, when they could have done something about it -- REPUBLICANS - controlled both House and Senate. If you watched something other than Faux Noise, you'd know that.
Wish he would get the cock out his mouth so we can understand him. Actually, I dont want to understand him. His actions regarding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have cost this Country so much. Do some research people on his connection to them companies. He didnt want to add regulations to these two companies because he had his cock in one of the companies' employees' ass. Look into it people. Sad to say it is very true.
imanerd36.. You're an idiot..You are the type of person that tears down the moral fabric of this country..MOVE TO FRANCE WILL YA... I'll buy you the ticket.
Believe it or not, the USA would not exist if it were not for France. They bailed us out in the Revolutionary war(yes, I realize we bailed them out later.) You and your set morals and my set of morals do not mean more than anyone elses, since we are all equal. BTW: The founding fathers who built this country on religion, read some of their quotes about church, ect.
History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.
-Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813
From what I understand, Scalia along with other conservatives supported legislating what adult gay people do in their bedrooms. That seems pretty homophobic to me.
Then you don't understand much. There have been sodomy laws in almost every state for years. They were declared unconstitutional in Lawrence v. Texas. How could Scalia (not even a member of the Legislature) support an Act that has already been declared unconstitutional?
robislost, homosexual sodomy has nothing to do with the defense of marriage act, justice anthony kennedy specifically said the ruling had nothing to do with gay marriage in his ruling
Many things can be blown out of proportion, except the specific comments about Scalia being a homophobe. Frank is a complete moron and a liar he uses being a homosexual to his advantage nothing more.
Well you're basically full of something. The only ones that use religion to their advantage are Muslims (terrorists) . Since we were founded with freedom of religion (not freedom from), your statement is void of logic and reason.
If you do not like the way the country was founded, I'm certain you are free (only in America) to leave and start your own elsewhere. When you actually graduate you'll start to understand.
P.S. Frank is a BUM and should be in prison, but he'd enjoy it way too much.
Oh boy! Another tolerant name caller! Let's look at that wonderful statement of yours, what about pedophiles or beastiality? Where's the freedom of? How can you deny them their right to 'freedom of'?
Hypocrisy and falsehoods.....By the way, sisnce you're such a loving, tolerant lefty I'm certain you had to restrain your self with "idiot" eh?
and did you seriously just equate homosexuality to pedophilia & bestiality? nice. so you can't see the glaring difference between two consenting adults who happen to be gay and someone victimizing animals or children? thanks for pissing on the constitution.
you know, it's not like the Christine Todd Whitmans or the Chris Buckleys or the Colin Powells stopped beleiving in God or the notion of limited govt; they were chased away by a bunch of loons with "GOD HATES FAGS" signs.
It actually hold more than yours....sodomites and beastiality have held the same category for centuries...as a twisted decrepit form of sexual pleasure, nothing more.
What consenting adult do in their own home is fine, but forcing a societal change based upon a sexual habit is another.
Sodomy is not the same as race creed or color...there fore is not subject to the same interpretation by the law...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
LMAO @ ponyboy.. Hey ponyboy.. Do you suck a dick that's freshly pulled out of that nasty ass? You sick disgusting FAGGOT RUMP RANGERS ARE DISGUSTING !
Thank you for posting this, CBS.
writersblock26 3 months ago
This is disgraceful and rep. frank should be ashamed of his comments. Have some respect for a sitting supreme court justice. What an absolute disgrace. How did this guy get elected? Fucking faggot.
robb817 6 months ago
@robb817
The truth hurts.
Einsteinbomb 5 months ago
@woppy42 Gag on u??!!!! Hell, If I wanted to smoke a cigarette I'd buy a pack of marlboro's. Don't make me laugh. As far as fucking me... puhlease. You're really brave behind a keyboard. Come down to dallas and I'll show you what a longhorn is for... And I promise you won't enjoy it.
chillichomper 6 months ago
@woppy42 How original! I hope u didn't strain your pea brain with that one but if thats one of your fantasies then more power to you. Just don't expect me to support your marriage request to Steve. *Gag Gag*
chillichomper 6 months ago
If it as up to Barney The Banking Queen every Congressman would be allowed to run a male prostitution network out of his home.
YOUGET4REAL 11 months ago
youtube
/watch?v=wZlyRnx1VNE
shanekg45 1 year ago
Excuse me, but WHY DIDN'T ANYONE TELL ME that there was a news network dedicated to the gays?! It's like a FOX News for for the gay crowd! But in all seriousness, I'm happy for them.
NightRangerII 1 year ago
Go get a hooker Barney!!!!
tom87pate 1 year ago
Gosh.. Poor guy. He's mentally retarded...
Nashhinton 1 year ago
@Nashhinton
you can't call a judge mentally retarded !
wakniss 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wakniss, Gosh.. Poor guy. BARNEY FRANK's mentally retarded... :P
Nashhinton 9 months ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 9 months ago
@wakniss i concur. comparing anyone like to scalia to the mentally retarded is a gross insult to the latter.
iago68 7 months ago
IF scalia is a homophobe then we need someone like that on the Supreme court to counter the Intelligephobe's everywhere else. Barney Frank is the most arrogant, selfish mafo out there. I'd take a baseball bat to him, rangel , reid and pelosi any day of the week! The fact that these people got "reelected" speaks volumes to the level of electorate corruption that only seems to be a problem when a republican gets elected.
chillichomper 1 year ago
Hate crimes are stupid. We are not groups, we are individuals.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
What a ridiculous, powerful claim, and reporters don't even give it a follow up. Frank had more to do with the financial crisis than anyone, lets get him out of Congress!
netster007z 1 year ago
Antonin Scalia is not a homophobe, what is this dood talking about?
anikinippon 1 year ago
@anikinippon Would it bother you if he was? Most people who like Antonin Scalia would be happy to know he's a homophobe. May want to better reconcile your conflicting beliefs. Here's a fun little task - try to find anything that would support your theory that he "is not a homophobe" and, if you not only can't (and actually find more evidence that he is), maybe rethink your thoughts about him.
strweed 1 year ago
@strweed Absence of evidence in not a strength of an argument, it's a weakness. It's on a legal basis that he makes his legal opinions, not from bias and prejudice.
anikinippon 1 year ago
barney frank is an idiot and asshole.
hint0122 1 year ago
Barney Frank is a scumbag just like every other person on the Hill, homo or hetero.
GodIsTheOnlyJudge 1 year ago
@GodIsTheOnlyJudge
Just because it's an anti-incumbent year that doesn't mean there all bad. It's just a few incumbents that have screwed up. I always keep in touch with my Rep. and try to see them every few months. You should try the same because to call them all scumbags isn't right, because it is only a few of them that fucked up.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
I'm from the San Francisco Bay Area. Population is really big here. And, yes I met my Rep when I was 10 years old and still know her today, my father was a huge supporter and contributer. I've always gotten a response from my Rep. and it seems that in your case your Rep. is just impotent. If your Rep continues with this path then I guess this Rep. isn't representing you and vote them out. Just curious what political party or affiliation does your Rep. belong too if at all?
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
You've got it all wrong to assume what your saying. I was introduced to my Rep. by my father. I became involved and active in supporting my Rep. in High School by doing everything from calling up potential voters to creating a website to gain more votes. Don't be so quick to judge because it becomes ludicrous to make an assessment about me when you don't have any idea how much time and effort I placed in helping my Rep. get re-elected.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
GodIsTheOnlyJudge 1 year ago
@GodIsTheOnlyJudge
Your either oblivious or certainly stupid. Your assuming because of my fathers connection I have the luxury of knowing my Rep. Anyone can get to know their Rep. as long as they care. Now it's not my fault that you have a shitty Rep. Vote them out! Now going on to make comments on naivety and sheltered behavior when you don't know the other person is a dangerous attitude. Don't be a prick and go on to state that you know the TRUTH because you don't know shit!
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
Your two messages tell me your more frustrated than I thought, wow not enough characters to write about. Damn your Rep. is that bad huh? My Rep. is the shit that's why I voted for her, too bad we can't all have that luxury. I just finished a year at my school of education and I'm also a Beaver but can't recall our mutual school being known for politics and law. So, forgive me if I have doubts about your presence at our mutual school. And, UT Grad what a crook.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
Bullshit...you don't even know where Caltech is located. Give me Dabney Houses significant motto and Ricketts House sick ass slogan. BTW what was your house if at all.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
Your dead wrong as to what house I belonged to at Caltech. What house did you belong too? I'm also curious if you knew whom were our biggest rivals as a learning institution at Caltech were?... because anybody who attended knows those fuckers. Ohh....and by the way I will not be returning to Caltech this year because because I will be pursuing other opportunities at Cal this upcoming fall. Better grad school then your gay UT.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
Left Caltech because of a change in major. And, you still haven't told me anything about your supposed Caltech experience. Come on give me at least our rivals and do it to convince me. And, Jonas Zmuidzinas was my intro to Physics instructor by the way.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
Stop lying through your ass. I rarely ever went to Dabney house even though it was really nice so I couldn't comment on your mural if it was even there. So, once again who was our rival school? Answer me that because you're not convincing anyone. BTW what was your major there because clearly you didn't major in politics at Caltech.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
BTW loser I was a Flem (Fleming House). And, really if you truly went to Caltech anyone can tell MIT is our rival, but a real student would know about our rocky relationship with our other school. Give you a hint they're much more local then MIT.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
No shit MIT is Caltech's rival but quick question why did it take you so long to respond to this? This is because you're bullshitting me loser. MIT should of been the first thing that came to mind, there really is no other that comes to mind. Stop looking up info of Caltech and stop being a prick. I choose to attend Cal because Caltech didn't have my major and that's why I left fool.
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Comment removed
mitchelltoddj 1 year ago
@mitchelltoddj
So, how many rotations as a frosh did it take you to find out that you didn't belong at Caltech?
Einsteinbomb 1 year ago
Same-Sex marriage and other homosexual policies are a state issue. The United States Constitution does not say anything about it. Advancement of the homosexual agenda has never been able to pass through the democratic process. That is why advocates of homosexual policies try to use people like Barney Frank in the federal government and the state courts to obtain what they never will through elections.
colonialmilitias1776 2 years ago
Ha-Rumf! Well-said.
Barney Frank should stick to making banks give loans to those who can't meet the standard loan requirements. Way to go Barney!
socalcraigster 2 years ago
@colonialmilitias1776
I like how you guys are such populists when it comes to things you don't like.
catbuffalo 1 year ago
Scalia might be a social conservative, but that does not make him a homophobe. I have gay friends who know I don't support gay marriage.
The reason Scalia and probably Thomas would not strike down the Defense of Marriage Act however, is that they are originalists who interpret the constitution as it is. Since there is no Right to Marriage in the Constitution, they leave it up to Congress. They're not saying "No gay marriage." They're saying "let it come democratically."
whatevalife6 2 years ago
scaclia is a textbook case of an "activist judge." where's the vitriol from the Usual Suspects about his using the bench as a podium?
TheConcernedPatriot 2 years ago
when in doubt, call someone a racist or something else to get them to shut up. typical
hint0122 2 years ago
@hint0122
How does being against equal marriage rights not make you a bigot? Explain that to me. Seems justified to me.
catbuffalo 1 year ago
nothing is equal since you take some rights away from others.affirmative action is meant to be equal, but is it?
hint0122 1 year ago
@hint0122
Having a job is not a right, but back to my main point which was that being against equal rights does classify someone as a bigot. What do you think a bigot is? I'm tired of conservatives whining about name-calling it's getting old. I thought you guys weren't politically correct.
catbuffalo 1 year ago
in my view, let gay people marry. why shouldnt they be just as miserable as the rest of the world is
hint0122 1 year ago
People wake up the gay subject isnt a fed. issue its a local goverment issue that we the people vote on and it will pass or fail....But i guess these a-holes have nothing to talk about ...
EyetalionMafia 2 years ago
If you disagree, they call you names: racist, homophobe, hatemonger, redneck....
The democrats are the party of social division.
Barney Frank has been horrible for this country. He is one of the MAIN reasons for the economic collapse. If he had done his job (regulation on the lenders) rather than push his ideology, the US wouldn't have had to go through the 2008/9 the economic mess.
designtoad 2 years ago 2
barney fag is just mad because scalia doesn't buy into the homosexual agenda, scalia is for civil liberties (he voted to strike down flag burning law, defends jury trial rights vigorously etc) however scalia recognizes that the constitution says nothing in defense of homosexuality, and that there are correct historical, medical and moral reasons for opposing homosexuality, that doesn't make you a bigot
abasi2008 2 years ago
the Constitution also says what the course of action should be if a runaway slave was captured...should we use those "insights" today as well?? the point you IDIOT is that a document written over 200 years ago cannot possibly speak to every concern of a 21st century society!! that is why judges should exercise COMMON SENSE and not mask their bigotry, racism with bullshit legal talk. if you're worried about medical and moral issues with homosexuality, then DON'T HAVE GAY SEX!!!
pitar821 2 years ago
That is incorrect. We amended the Constitution to remove that language.
And you are correct inasmuch as there are certain concerns that the framers could not have foreseen. This is why we have a legislature. If you want a constitutional right to homosexual conduct, marriage, and the like, pass a law or amend the Constitution.
ahirsch116 2 years ago
The Constitution does no such thing as we have amended it.
If you feel that the document does not speak to our current concerns, you have the option to attempt to amend it.
Until you do so, the Constitution means exactly what the current text says. Judges ought to be faithful to that literal text, even if you find the results repulsive. For those things the Constitution does not deal with, the judiciary ought to law the duly elected legislature and individual states do their jobs.
FAHayek89 2 years ago
Your legal reasoning on (the medical and moral are more complex), but please don't stoop to Frank's level of name calling. He does it because he has no argument and is filled with hate. Your actual argument is not one of a bigot, but the "Barney Fag" comment gives the impression that you are. You articulated a rational argument, and hopefully are not filled with hate, but the name calling destroys the credibility of your comments and undermines rational discourse.
FAHayek89 2 years ago
we are sick of your idiot agenda...
magicwhiteguys 2 years ago
Scalia is for civil liberies and yet voted to deny trials to people on American soil without any reason? That makes no since.
There are no medical reasons to oppose homosexuality(no major medical association says there is), each person should decide what's moral, not the government, and slavery is also historically fine so it that right?
imanerd36 2 years ago
Uneducated trailer trash say what?
Medical reasons for opposing homosexuality? Is that why the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychoanalytic Society all support gay marriage?
Nice try. Don't waste my time again with your sub-human IQ.
HomophobeGetsSmacked 2 years ago
1. I did not say you were trailer trash.
2. I did not say that any major medical associations support gay marriage. However, I am saying that they are saying that their is no medical reason to oppose it.
You have yet to respond to any of my points, and you seem to use name calling instead.
imanerd36 2 years ago
Reminds me of when Barney said Freddie Mac was a sound investment on national TV right before the bank crisis and people lost millions.
Never rely on a politicians promises, whatever side of this issue your on.
dortmundpls 2 years ago 14
@dortmundpls
Serves them right. Barney Frank is not a licensed financial advisor. People take tips from friends and family, then blame financial companies when they lose money. Fuck em all.
jvswerbo 1 year ago
@dortmundpls didn't frank say that like 4 years be4 freddie mac started having serious problems? it's not like he said it a week or a month b4 they started having serious problems.
exbronco1980 1 year ago
@dortmundpls He didn't say that retard. Also GUESS who was in the majority at that time, when they could have done something about it -- REPUBLICANS - controlled both House and Senate. If you watched something other than Faux Noise, you'd know that.
rakrobn 1 year ago
silly cocksucker
crayhead 2 years ago
And Barney is an obvious heterophobe.
SezLoMain 2 years ago
theres a news company called 365 gay news? ahahahahahahha oh my god
dz2ny 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Get these queers off of my TV and OUT of this country !! You liberal MORONS ! They tear at the moral fiber of LIFE itself....It's disgusting
JCRReality 2 years ago
Wish he would get the cock out his mouth so we can understand him. Actually, I dont want to understand him. His actions regarding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have cost this Country so much. Do some research people on his connection to them companies. He didnt want to add regulations to these two companies because he had his cock in one of the companies' employees' ass. Look into it people. Sad to say it is very true.
bhaverstock 2 years ago
we're here to stay...whether you like it or not!!!!
erkekler 2 years ago
Morals are subjective, not facts. There is no right or wrong answer to any moral question.
imanerd36 2 years ago
imanerd36.. You're an idiot..You are the type of person that tears down the moral fabric of this country..MOVE TO FRANCE WILL YA... I'll buy you the ticket.
JCRReality 2 years ago
Believe it or not, the USA would not exist if it were not for France. They bailed us out in the Revolutionary war(yes, I realize we bailed them out later.) You and your set morals and my set of morals do not mean more than anyone elses, since we are all equal. BTW: The founding fathers who built this country on religion, read some of their quotes about church, ect.
imanerd36 2 years ago
History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.
-Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813
The First Amendment is there for reason. Idiot.
swev89 2 years ago
Forget about the fags, where is Obongo's birth certificate?
StinkingHombre 2 years ago
From what I understand, Scalia along with other conservatives supported legislating what adult gay people do in their bedrooms. That seems pretty homophobic to me.
anatolebroyard 2 years ago
Then you don't understand much. There have been sodomy laws in almost every state for years. They were declared unconstitutional in Lawrence v. Texas. How could Scalia (not even a member of the Legislature) support an Act that has already been declared unconstitutional?
robislost 2 years ago
robislost, homosexual sodomy has nothing to do with the defense of marriage act, justice anthony kennedy specifically said the ruling had nothing to do with gay marriage in his ruling
abasi2008 2 years ago
Many things can be blown out of proportion, except the specific comments about Scalia being a homophobe. Frank is a complete moron and a liar he uses being a homosexual to his advantage nothing more.
Drumboy5165 2 years ago
Like how republicans use their religion to their advantage, and nothing more?
ponyboy316 2 years ago
Well you're basically full of something. The only ones that use religion to their advantage are Muslims (terrorists) . Since we were founded with freedom of religion (not freedom from), your statement is void of logic and reason.
If you do not like the way the country was founded, I'm certain you are free (only in America) to leave and start your own elsewhere. When you actually graduate you'll start to understand.
P.S. Frank is a BUM and should be in prison, but he'd enjoy it way too much.
Drumboy5165 2 years ago
you CAN NOT have "freedom of" if you don't have "freedom of"
you're an idiot.
TheConcernedPatriot 2 years ago
Oh boy! Another tolerant name caller! Let's look at that wonderful statement of yours, what about pedophiles or beastiality? Where's the freedom of? How can you deny them their right to 'freedom of'?
Hypocrisy and falsehoods.....By the way, sisnce you're such a loving, tolerant lefty I'm certain you had to restrain your self with "idiot" eh?
Drumboy5165 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheConcernedPatriot 2 years ago
and did you seriously just equate homosexuality to pedophilia & bestiality? nice. so you can't see the glaring difference between two consenting adults who happen to be gay and someone victimizing animals or children? thanks for pissing on the constitution.
you know, it's not like the Christine Todd Whitmans or the Chris Buckleys or the Colin Powells stopped beleiving in God or the notion of limited govt; they were chased away by a bunch of loons with "GOD HATES FAGS" signs.
TheConcernedPatriot 2 years ago
Just get over that argument, you know it hold's no water.
Animal's and children can't consent to sexual relation's OR sign a marriage license. Two adult's can. Next please.
SebastienCade 2 years ago
It actually hold more than yours....sodomites and beastiality have held the same category for centuries...as a twisted decrepit form of sexual pleasure, nothing more.
What consenting adult do in their own home is fine, but forcing a societal change based upon a sexual habit is another.
Sodomy is not the same as race creed or color...there fore is not subject to the same interpretation by the law...
Next please!
Drumboy5165 2 years ago
Comment removed
SebastienCade 2 years ago
should read: "freedom of" if you don't have "freedom from"
I R an idiot too.
TheConcernedPatriot 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LMAO @ ponyboy.. Hey ponyboy.. Do you suck a dick that's freshly pulled out of that nasty ass? You sick disgusting FAGGOT RUMP RANGERS ARE DISGUSTING !
JCRReality 2 years ago
It was a small part of the interview, but in this era of YouTube the small stuff can be blown out of proportion.
abarzilai664 2 years ago 7