great --- hey give the Clintons credit for creativity in changing the rules...imagine what Bush could say if he could come up with some many versions.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Keith Olbermann is a ridiculous posturing hack. He is no better than Bill O'Reilly. The two of them should be put in a burning boat and floated out to sea.
Whether you support OBAMA or CLINTON you should never accept the theory that some state dont count. How can you supporters of Mrs Clinton talk about states not counting while trying to get Michigan and Florida to count. Talk about talking out the side of your neck.
Olbermann you are a raving lunatic and a sexist pig. This is a democracy and we are not done voting. OBAMA CANNOT WIN WITHOUT THE SUPERDELEGATES (show that math) EITHER AND PEOPLE ARE STILL VOTING. The majority of the American people don't even know who Olbermann is. I vote in a caucus state and Obama thugs stole this election with the undemocratic caucuses.
You are SUCH a liar, I live in a caucus state also (state delegate for Obama) the HRC people TRIED to lock the door and one of them took off with the signup sheets (27 of them) for Obama. During the district delegate more than 65% of HRC delegates DID NOT SHOW UP, they tried to "change the rules" but was defeated.
Unlike HRC Obama follows the rules and does not try to change to STEAL this election or anything else.
Gee, I wonder who he wants to win? It would be nice if the media would get their lips of Obama's ass. He's gotten a free ride with the media this whole time, even giving him the benefit of the doubt with the while Wright thing. Obama will get the nomination because Democrats know it will destroy the party now if he doesn't.
Ryu, what are you talking about? All Olbermann did was take the talking points the Clinton campaign has said during this race and show how ridiculous they are. And no, Obama hasn't gotten a "free ride" - they can't find any dirt on him because he doesn't have any. And OF COURSE giving Hillary the nomination will destroy the party - you can't give the nomination to someone who received the least amount of votes without causing problems.
Olbermann - FANTASTIC job. I couldn't stop laughing.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Least amount of votes? If you count Michigan and Florida, Clinton would have more votes, at least the last I heard. Those voters are being disenfranchised because of some stupid party rules. Secondly, there is plenty of dirt on Obama and when it has been brought up it has been swept under the rug and minimized. The problem here is that any attack on Obama is viewed as racist so the media has to tread lightly. I'm not a republican and will not vote for McCain.
Typical Hillary supporter - just not well educated enough to do even simple math - or understand simple rules. You wanna count Michigan? Fine - but hold an actual election - not one that had only one candidate on the ballot, violating the rules she signed up under. Wonder what else she'll violate?
As has been said before, Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, so regardless of the rules, if he had been on the ballot Michigan itself would have been a different issue. Also, you think 24/7 of Wright is sweeping things under the rug or minimized? It's simple mud-slinging and you know it.
You idiot THOSE STATES DO NOT COUNT, but if you want to change the rules why not count the popular votes in the caucus states. This will add minimum 1,000,000 net votes to Obama's total, so since this does not work in HRC favor OF COURSE this doesn't count. Right?
the way they keep changing the metrics reminds me of logrolling...or maybe wile e. coyote running over the end of the cliff--just don't look down and everything will be a-ok.
RyuHayabusa06: "...the media has to tread lightly."
Yeah, they've been giving Obama a free ride. Swept the Jeremiah Wright controversy right under the rug. Not like the drubbing they gave McCain over John Hagee.
dude so i had to look at the context of your comment because i saw it and i was like this guy typed this while on crack. then i saw the other guys comment. right on man, mccain hasnt had to denounce, renounce or anything like that. he went on george stephonopolis and said, i shouldnt have asked for his support, but im happy to have it. i disagree with anything negative he said. they should have nailed him
Queotic, I know right, I laughed so hard last night I hit the floor. I called everyone I knew last night to watch this, we laughed our butts off last night.
Are you kidding? The reason this race is still going on is that the media is giving HILLARY a pass on her mendacious "kitchen sink" approach...there's no talk about her lying to the people of IN about the likelihood of the oil producers actually passing on the savings from the gas tax to the consumer (and she knows it), no talk about the fact that she has been essentially mathematically eliminated from the nomination for weeks but continues to forge stupidly ahead doing whatever she wants...etc.
Since George Bush took office, the US Dollar has lost half its value against the Euro while the annual trade deficit doubled.
We cannot afford four more years of George Bush economics under John McCain.
Richardgwm 3 years ago
@Richardgwm
Bush obviously sucked, but the problem with the dollar goes way deeper.
I would suggest you research the value of the dollar since its inception to present, if you have not done so already.
There is a crystal clear trend not unlike that of Penny Stocks.
ThndersRage 1 year ago
great --- hey give the Clintons credit for creativity in changing the rules...imagine what Bush could say if he could come up with some many versions.
glxtokyo 3 years ago
I am an American who lives overseas, so this is my first exposure to Keith. I gotta say, this was hilarious!
rainadale 3 years ago 5
He's quite excellent. This is an example of his finer moments.
-Qes
QuasiEvilScott 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Keith Olbermann is a ridiculous posturing hack. He is no better than Bill O'Reilly. The two of them should be put in a burning boat and floated out to sea.
cythera4 3 years ago
you're a hillary supporter, eh?
intarwebzz 3 years ago
Whether you support OBAMA or CLINTON you should never accept the theory that some state dont count. How can you supporters of Mrs Clinton talk about states not counting while trying to get Michigan and Florida to count. Talk about talking out the side of your neck.
majixone77 3 years ago 4
The Clinton campaign employees such a pathetic group of people. Oh well. Slap some flag decals on the pig and call it presidential.
CHOZENProductions 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Olbermann you are a raving lunatic and a sexist pig. This is a democracy and we are not done voting. OBAMA CANNOT WIN WITHOUT THE SUPERDELEGATES (show that math) EITHER AND PEOPLE ARE STILL VOTING. The majority of the American people don't even know who Olbermann is. I vote in a caucus state and Obama thugs stole this election with the undemocratic caucuses.
ag763 3 years ago
Thank you ag763. I've been wondering what kind of drooling cretin would actually vote for Hillary. Now I know.
47f0 3 years ago
Why weren't the caucuses all that undemocratic when Hillary thought she was going to win Iowa?
commiepanda 3 years ago
You are SUCH a liar, I live in a caucus state also (state delegate for Obama) the HRC people TRIED to lock the door and one of them took off with the signup sheets (27 of them) for Obama. During the district delegate more than 65% of HRC delegates DID NOT SHOW UP, they tried to "change the rules" but was defeated.
Unlike HRC Obama follows the rules and does not try to change to STEAL this election or anything else.
You Idiot
kachfan 3 years ago 2
oh yes, the obama thugs....who's that again?
intarwebzz 3 years ago
SCORE!
dhendrix63 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Gee, I wonder who he wants to win? It would be nice if the media would get their lips of Obama's ass. He's gotten a free ride with the media this whole time, even giving him the benefit of the doubt with the while Wright thing. Obama will get the nomination because Democrats know it will destroy the party now if he doesn't.
RyuHayabusa06 3 years ago
Ryu, what are you talking about? All Olbermann did was take the talking points the Clinton campaign has said during this race and show how ridiculous they are. And no, Obama hasn't gotten a "free ride" - they can't find any dirt on him because he doesn't have any. And OF COURSE giving Hillary the nomination will destroy the party - you can't give the nomination to someone who received the least amount of votes without causing problems.
Olbermann - FANTASTIC job. I couldn't stop laughing.
queotic 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Least amount of votes? If you count Michigan and Florida, Clinton would have more votes, at least the last I heard. Those voters are being disenfranchised because of some stupid party rules. Secondly, there is plenty of dirt on Obama and when it has been brought up it has been swept under the rug and minimized. The problem here is that any attack on Obama is viewed as racist so the media has to tread lightly. I'm not a republican and will not vote for McCain.
RyuHayabusa06 3 years ago
Typical Hillary supporter - just not well educated enough to do even simple math - or understand simple rules. You wanna count Michigan? Fine - but hold an actual election - not one that had only one candidate on the ballot, violating the rules she signed up under. Wonder what else she'll violate?
47f0 3 years ago 4
As has been said before, Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, so regardless of the rules, if he had been on the ballot Michigan itself would have been a different issue. Also, you think 24/7 of Wright is sweeping things under the rug or minimized? It's simple mud-slinging and you know it.
technicschic 3 years ago 2
You idiot THOSE STATES DO NOT COUNT, but if you want to change the rules why not count the popular votes in the caucus states. This will add minimum 1,000,000 net votes to Obama's total, so since this does not work in HRC favor OF COURSE this doesn't count. Right?
kachfan 3 years ago 2
the way they keep changing the metrics reminds me of logrolling...or maybe wile e. coyote running over the end of the cliff--just don't look down and everything will be a-ok.
intarwebzz 3 years ago
RyuHayabusa06: "...the media has to tread lightly."
Yeah, they've been giving Obama a free ride. Swept the Jeremiah Wright controversy right under the rug. Not like the drubbing they gave McCain over John Hagee.
wildwilly1111 3 years ago 2
dude so i had to look at the context of your comment because i saw it and i was like this guy typed this while on crack. then i saw the other guys comment. right on man, mccain hasnt had to denounce, renounce or anything like that. he went on george stephonopolis and said, i shouldnt have asked for his support, but im happy to have it. i disagree with anything negative he said. they should have nailed him
mcalien24 3 years ago
Queotic, I know right, I laughed so hard last night I hit the floor. I called everyone I knew last night to watch this, we laughed our butts off last night.
kachfan 3 years ago
You don't have to be for anyone in this race to know that the campaign strategy of the Clintons is faulty, insane, and stupid.
PussycatGoGo 3 years ago 10
Are you kidding? The reason this race is still going on is that the media is giving HILLARY a pass on her mendacious "kitchen sink" approach...there's no talk about her lying to the people of IN about the likelihood of the oil producers actually passing on the savings from the gas tax to the consumer (and she knows it), no talk about the fact that she has been essentially mathematically eliminated from the nomination for weeks but continues to forge stupidly ahead doing whatever she wants...etc.
ACARook 3 years ago 6
Nice work by Keith and his staff
realbram 3 years ago 10