How is it that you can get 13 GB/s of throughput when the bus bandwidth available to two pcie 2.0 x8 cards is only 8 GB/s half duplex? Are you doing host side decompression?
@TheKarlsruheprotest You don't understand the question. They are either overclocking the pcie bus, doing host side decompression in order to squeeze more effective bandwidth out of the system, or something else. In either situation, the results are not generally replicable.
The cards has an x8 connector, and they are in RAID0. A single x8 slot theoretically supports up to 8GB/s. Add the two slots together and you end up with a maximum bandwidth of 16GB/s.
@MarTuv93 I understand what you're saying. PCI-E 3.0 is 8GB/s on a 3.0 x8 slot. but the cards are PCI-E 2.0 spec, PCI-E 2.0 is 4GB/s on an x8 slot. so either they can use the PCI-E 3.0 bandwidth with a 2.0 Spec connection then i have to re-learn all this. like putting a USB 2.0 flash drive in a USB 3.0 port won't go at 5Gbit/s, it'l still go 2.0 speeds. but a PCI-E 2.0 card in a 3.0 slot all of a sudden allows it to go at 3.0 speeds.. huh :|
@MarTuv93 Yes, but they are doing 100% reads per the IOMeter screen. That means they do not get the full duplex bandwidth of pcie. Looking at pictures of the RM1616 from elsewhere makes me think it is actually a x16 card, in which case these numbers are reasonable. That would also be consistent with their nomenclature: RM88 is 8 sandforce controllers and x8 pcie. RM1616 is 16 sandforce controllers and *likely* x16, despite the card on top of the system indicating x8.
Too bad that they still stick to stupid 40-60-80-120-240 GB SSD-s and they talking here about 16 TB. This is pitiful!!! Even i see that some other manafacturers talking about 40 TB SSD in Raids. I don`t need 40 TB for home but 1-2 TB SSD will be nice to have. not in 10 years, more like soon. 1-2 max.
I have only 1 SSD 40 GB for system for apps and some games and i`m NOT planing to buy any new SSD until they increase in size.
How is it that you can get 13 GB/s of throughput when the bus bandwidth available to two pcie 2.0 x8 cards is only 8 GB/s half duplex? Are you doing host side decompression?
samebradshaw 1 month ago
@samebradshaw RAID0
TheKarlsruheprotest 1 month ago
@TheKarlsruheprotest You don't understand the question. They are either overclocking the pcie bus, doing host side decompression in order to squeeze more effective bandwidth out of the system, or something else. In either situation, the results are not generally replicable.
samebradshaw 1 month ago
@samebradshaw
The cards has an x8 connector, and they are in RAID0. A single x8 slot theoretically supports up to 8GB/s. Add the two slots together and you end up with a maximum bandwidth of 16GB/s.
MarTuv93 1 month ago
@MarTuv93 I understand what you're saying. PCI-E 3.0 is 8GB/s on a 3.0 x8 slot. but the cards are PCI-E 2.0 spec, PCI-E 2.0 is 4GB/s on an x8 slot. so either they can use the PCI-E 3.0 bandwidth with a 2.0 Spec connection then i have to re-learn all this. like putting a USB 2.0 flash drive in a USB 3.0 port won't go at 5Gbit/s, it'l still go 2.0 speeds. but a PCI-E 2.0 card in a 3.0 slot all of a sudden allows it to go at 3.0 speeds.. huh :|
hl2ep3 1 month ago
@hl2ep3
No PCIe 2.0 supports 1GB/s of bandwidth per lane. PCIe 3.0 is 2GB/s of bandwidth. Look it up on pcisig dot com if you don't believe me.
MarTuv93 1 month ago
@MarTuv93 Yes, but they are doing 100% reads per the IOMeter screen. That means they do not get the full duplex bandwidth of pcie. Looking at pictures of the RM1616 from elsewhere makes me think it is actually a x16 card, in which case these numbers are reasonable. That would also be consistent with their nomenclature: RM88 is 8 sandforce controllers and x8 pcie. RM1616 is 16 sandforce controllers and *likely* x16, despite the card on top of the system indicating x8.
samebradshaw 1 month ago
lol, getting close to DDR3 RAM speeds.
bigdima3 1 month ago
show windows boot!
kevinsmammaxd 1 month ago 4
yeah il take 4 and raid em to get 52GB/s and then add them to my ivy bridge extreme
prankmypants 1 month ago
SH!T 13GB/s !!!!
wixx95 1 month ago
Wow...
murder00redrum 1 month ago
and again nonsense from ocz congrats!
Hackslashs0r 1 month ago
Sweet Jesus. Why do you need that much speed! I would do it if I won the lotto though. Lol
epeets 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Too bad that they still stick to stupid 40-60-80-120-240 GB SSD-s and they talking here about 16 TB. This is pitiful!!! Even i see that some other manafacturers talking about 40 TB SSD in Raids. I don`t need 40 TB for home but 1-2 TB SSD will be nice to have. not in 10 years, more like soon. 1-2 max.
I have only 1 SSD 40 GB for system for apps and some games and i`m NOT planing to buy any new SSD until they increase in size.
solarfox2010 1 month ago
Comment removed
solarfox2010 1 month ago
Damn it, now I rethink and save for my new SSD setup.
IROHINE 1 month ago
My 1 GB/s Agility 3 RAID 0 just got raped.
osx86touch 1 month ago
EL OH EL.
h4xmode 1 month ago