3% of your Representatives in Congress honors their Oath of Office to "...support and defend the United States..." 100% of the time in the 112th Congress:S Myrick NC, Ron Paul TX, P Roe TN, B Posey FL, C Mack FL, T McClintock CA, R Labrador ID, T Huelskamp KS, T Johnson IL, W Jones NC, A Harris MD, T Graves GA, John Duncan, JR TN, Jeffery Duncan SC, J Campbell CA, J Chaffetz UT, J Amash MI, Rand Paul KY (The Freedom Index 8-8-11 sans those who voted for ndaa) Restore America RON PAUL 2012
Facts: 1) night time temps are inc. faster than daytime temps. 2) winter temps are inc. faster than summer temps. 3) heating and expansion of troposphere and cooling of stratosphere measured. If you can explain these observations without the mechanism of IR radiation absorption without CO2 be my guest.The crisis is real and delay cannot be tolerated. If we reach 450 ppm threshold we are lost as permafrost will begin to out gas methane. Dust-bowlification->food insec.->riots and political instab
Read the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Federalist Papers, Bastiat's The Law. Know the history of USA or you can't support & defend it. Restore America 2012 Ron Paul RonPaul2012dotcom 1835 “Minute” on India written by Thomas Babington Macaulay; A government cannot be wrong in punishing fraud or force, but it is almost certain to be wrong if, abandoning its legitimate function, it tells private individuals that it knows their business better than they know it themselves.
The earth cannot fix itself until it stops producing millions of new consumers daily. The "balancing out" will occur when the earth's population contracts dramatically.
I typed wrong I left out "on it's way to be." Doesn't really matter anyway because they said when it closes it'll trap greenhouse gases and kill us, so either way we're screwed.
Who gives a crap? When there was a hole on the ozone we were in trouble and when the hole closed itself we were in trouble, so no matter what way we swing we're in deep crap. I think it's all bull and just another way for tree hugging liberals to impose their "expensive" life styles on the American public. Nature will heal itself. It did it before us and it will do it after us. One volcanic eruption puts more pollution in the air than 100 years worth of LA traffic.
@aquarianbabe The hole has not closed. The ozone layer is repairing itself because of the moratorium imposed on CFC's in aerosol sprays and other sources decided in the Montreal Protocol 24 years ago. Check your facts.
Do your own research, people! Don't read YouTube comments that try to explain shit, as 98% of them are their own, illogical opinions. There are the other 2%, though.
@TheSketchExpress I'm glad you can come up with such an astute evaluation of my IQ. In fact, I'm probably a lot smarter than you and YES, I do my research. Check it yourself. I didn't try to explain anything. I just know that the world's pollutant output is way more than humans and it manages to correct itself. If anything we're doing the earth a disservice by trying to fix and conserve everything. The earth was balancing before we got here and will be after we're gone.
This "man" is a vindictive and bad pilot that because of his error (pilot error) is using his legislative powers to draft a "pilots bill of rights" against the FAA that censored him for landing on a closed runway in Oct. of 2010 that was full of very frightened construction repair workers. What a horrible human and bad public servant. Most of all a terrible pilot!
now do you idiots get it? 300 tornadoes ripped though the Midwest is one 24 hour period. Jim the liar Imhoff is a thug baby killer in a suit. More than 500 people paid with their lives because of this lying coward. He makes me sick.
Lol @ you liberal idiots always resorting to the word "fascist." You don't even know what it means. Weren't the bailouts that Obama voted for "fascism"? I guess that Obama is a fascist then. Lol.
@Edgehead10075 The replies I get from right-wing trolls like YOU are amazing & so amusing! (Righties always resort to using the word "socialist" & have no idea what it means)
09-10 saw the reversal of several years of sea ice loss, as well as expansion of glaciers.
Just because there's a "scientific" consensus doesn't prove anything. Also, many of the IPCC's "scientists" were ECONOMISTS, NOT meteorologists, and NOT climatologists. Thus, you're referring to studies that are fallacious. Also, you have to remember there was a "scientific" consensus once that the world was flat.
@Slipknotyk06 Sorry that's not correct. The overwhelming consensus that (a) global warming is a fact, and (b) it is effected by human activity, is among climate scientists. While scientific consensus is not immune to mistake, it is not rational to hold another view at present because there is no other legitimate conclusion of equal weight, that isn't simply part of a politically, economically, or religiously motivated opposition. Anyone saying otherwise is lying to you.
@dtstrain - IT'S NOT A FACT. Your theory holds no real truth because the scientists that made your theory weren't even scientists in the proper field. Also, data collection methods of the UN IPCC have been determined to be incredibly poor. Sample sizes collected by the IPCC have been determined to be too small to determine climatological trends. IPCC also ignored studies with contradictory evidence to their own, even if the methodology was vastly superior to their own.
@dtstrain - CO2science released a great video series on here that determines the relationship of CO2 to life and to global temperatures. CO2 is actually shown to have nearly an inverse relationship to temperature versus that which is claimed by IPCC. CO2 concentrations peak 800 years into ICE AGES! There are many meteorologists and climatologists that believe in cyclical climate change and believe man-made global warming is a myth, but consensus DOES NOT MAKE A FACT!
@dtstrain - CO2science released a great video series on here that determines the relationship of CO2 to life and to global temperatures. CO2 is actually shown to have nearly an inverse relationship to temperature versus that which is claimed by IPCC. CO2 concentrations peak 800 years into ICE AGES! There are many meteorologists and climatologists that believe in cyclical climate change and believe man-made global warming is a myth, but consensus DOES NOT MAKE A FACT!
@dtstrain You remember that volcano that erupted some months ago in, I believe, it was Iceland? I think that's the correct country. Anyway, that one belch from the earth tore down what amounted to fifty years of clean and green air. Don't think humans are responsible. We're just caught in the middle of it. If you're for the green agenda and carbon credits...well...I hope you enjoy your communist government. I don't plan to see it.
Yes Inhofe, you won but then there's the science. Whatever the way you paint climate science as a conspiarcy, man-made climate change is real. The only conspiracy is with your bed-fellows, the oil and coal industry.
Inhofe is right. So called man made global warming is indeed the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on western people. Like the latest Great Lakes satellite fiasco (you know Egg Harbour 604 Fahrenheit and tens of other boiling places there up in Wisconsin) tells us - we can't anymore trust any measurements.
Man made global warming is just pure crap and wet dream of greenies for taxing people.
the hottest spring and summer on record in the history of time 2010 and the conservatives have their heads buried up each others asses , i think thats why they cant telll whats going on
In Germany, its a crime to deny the holocaust. Given what happened, its an understandable law. If only we had a way to transport people like James Inhofe into the future to see the holocaust that awaits our descendants, perhaps it would be possible to do the sensible thing now: outlaw denial of anthropogenic global warming.
I'm not saying that reasonable people can disagree on how best to address the problem. What I'm saying is that its criminal to deny that it exists.
@1776independent reasonable ppl can disagree.. but the right arent the ones talking about jailing ppl or making it a crime for ppl to disagree with anthropogenic global warming, something projected in the future. comparing it to the holocaust, something that is known in the past, better be careful lefty ur totalitarian roots r starting to show. dont disagree or we jail u, lol and well show r gw films to 6 yr old children who havent had a reasonable enough science class to even understand it.
@Illumified Apparently you failed to read what I wrote adequately. I made the comparison of the German holocaust and postulated equivalence in an imaginary world that included a time machine to verify the similar consequences of inaction on AGW.
You're making my point for me, 'righty,' when you start bringing 6 year olds into the discussion. Your argument is incoherent and has nothing to do with the topic.
You either trust overwhelming scientific consensus or you don't.
@1776independent "perhaps it would be possible to do the sensible thing now: outlaw denial of anthropogenic global warming." lol yeah and the reason I brought up 6 yr olds is because global warming films r being shown to grade school kids who havent even had an adequate class on science in order to comprehend it, thats an easy way to spot propaganda .as far as consensus there have been plenty of overwhelming consensuses in the past ud think ud learn better by now
Ah, English, spoken by a clown. I suppose your 'adequate class on science' in your world would be held at the Creationism Museum where one can find a giant plastic dinosaur with a saddle on its back.
So to your point about overwhelming consensuses in the past: which of these was proven incorrect? Cigarette smoking causes cancer? Gravity? E=MC2?
@1776independent lol down to the name calling already huh? well by science class I mean biology chemistry planetary and solar sciences, what would be involved in understanding a complex theory like anthropogenic global warming. teaching it to kids before they have had any of those classes is just ridiculous, as far as consensuses I was referring to things the church did in the middle ages but there are also plenty of modern ex. hole in the ozone, y2k, and in the 70's a terrible ice age was nigh
@Illumified Hole in the ozone consensus: Proven. Y2K: Not consensus at all, just some warnings about potential problems. The 70's time magazine ice age article: um, an article is not consensus.
@1776independent gravity is consensus ?? lol seriously, and for one consensus isnt an argument for or against a cause 51 % of ppl could believe the world is flat doesnt make it true 99% could believe it and it wouldnt make a difference, but lets keep talking about this and not hiding the decline or emails that show intention to manipulate the peer review process or destroy data, or how about the fact that co2( the thing plants breath) was declared a pollutant
@1776independent oh and btw there were more than one article, theres one from newsweek in 1975 and these journalist didnt just make this up they got it from "scientist"
@Edgehead10075 omg , a WWE fan , omg you are a MORON, hey here is a tidbit you might wana know, wrestling is fake, lol ,maybe thats why you think global warming is fake , lol, you FOOL. WWE and WRESTlING , OMG what are you 7?
Whats going on usa??, Fundamentalists drive politics.
Inhofe said (in senate!) "..I BELIEVE -VERY strongly- that we ought to support Israel; that it has a right to the land..because God said! so [..] it is at this place where GOD! appeared! to Abram! and SAID, "I am giving you this land — the West Bank. "
---
"...In recent years, the corporate PR campaigns has gone viral, spawning a denial movement that is distributed, decentralized and largely immune to reasoned response...."
The average American emits a ton of CO2e every 2 weeks.
A ton of CO2 is enough to fill: * 130,000 gallon milk jugs
or * An entire 2,200 square-foot house
Its emitted by: * Driving an average car about 2,000 miles * Heating, lighting, and powering the average home for a month * Sending 350 bags of trash to rot in a landfill * Running an average coal power plant for 9 seconds
Its saved by: * Taking sixty cars off the road for a day or * Growing 40 tropical trees for a year
No, natures balance become completely disturbed from our co2 emissions. Every kid knows that plants absorb co2 dude... but.. when we talk about our co2 emissions we talk about burned co2 from plants stored for hundreds of million years ..we pump that all in just 100years in the atmosphere.
Using the "plant food" phrase as argument.... makes science-deniers look even more naive. lol By the way,.. check greenmans movies, learn and support him!
Deny Science? No. Deny phony Science? Yes. If you and greenman want to believe in this, fine. It's your right too. But, don't try and foist your anxiety and arrogance on me. And don't ruin my country with your chicken little religion. As with every person that's tried to persuade me with his "facts". I don't believe you. You have the whole damn thing all wrong. But trying to convince you is like trying to convince a Christian that Christ wasn't the son of God. Good Day
(you)Deniers are the ones who (have to) "believe" -like a sick cult of mentally disordered sheeples. We dont call you "denier" because its bored, dude.
Btw i just investigated the freak called inhofe here.. and lol...?
Inhofes campaign ("God,Guns&Gays") donors represented the OIL&GAS ($446,900 in donations), leadership pacs ($316,720) and electric utilities ($221,654) industries/categories.
In 2010, his largest donors represented the OIL&GAS electric...
Cult? Sheeples? ROTFLMAO! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! Your science is all a lie and you still won't let go. Hey guess what, dude. This hoax is a lie and you bought it hook, line, and sinker. Don't you love living in a country that you've been made to hate? That's what I love about leftist zombies. They think they're doing good but the outcome is always bad. But hey, at least you "feel" good about it. No matter how many lives it ruins. I said Good Day!!
Denying reality will result in real shock when the truth does hit home. As for a"world government", well I'd like to see us pulling together to address the big global issues we face.The (leftism/nwo/lol) UN is powerless due to veto rights and we are obviously losing battles to save species, eradicate poverty and provide safe drinking water and sanitation. Our global population is expanding while resources are dwindling, especially energy, water and food.
People who make their living taking oil money are - by design compelled to lie on their behalf. It's such a simply concept. Temperature tracks CO2 level. My 6 year old cousin can understand that graph.
People who make their living taking government grant money are-by design, compelled to come up with whatever that government agenda is. It's so simple you don't see it. My graph shows the opposite. CO2 tracks temperature(I'll bet you who's right on this and you won't win because I have real science on my side. Not the faux science that your feeding your 6 year old cousin). Oh and by the way. STOP SCARING THE CHILDREN WITH YOUR BS.
Inhole needs to get a clue. Anthropolotical "GLOBAL WARMING" is turning out to be BS as I knew it always was. Global warming/cooling are natural. DUH.
Timothy McVeigh needs to come back from the dead and bomb the Oklahoma state house. It would be great if all the redneck politicians from that state like Inhofe would fucking die. FUCK OKLAHOMA!
EcrossH and jessie glad you guys could follow the link from Huffington Post and Moveon....have you got your recent mailing from Greenpeace lately? That tinfoil is not going to stop them from reading your mind be careful be very very careful they really are after you!!!!!
LOVE how Gore said that when we had really hot summer it was proof that Global Warming was occuring and then when it snowed oh thats weather don't you stupid doubters know the difference....lol what a fucking hypocrite and you morons follow everything he and his henchmen spew at you....while he is laughing all the way to the bank =P
You guys are just racist bigots.The KKK was a Democratic supported group and you still have one Representative that was or still is a member in Byrd...Also you have many members of the Black Panther movement another Racist group just like all you global warming/money realignment groupies...You deny that the facts are Global Warming is a natural event ..
The KKK was a Democratic supported group and you still have one Representative that was or still is a member in Byrd>>> So who cares? Both parties are vastly different today than back during the days of Reconstruction. And Byrd has apologized repeatedly for his KKK activities. You all have Trent Lott who, last I checked, never apologizes for being a racist.
Inhofe is owned by big oil. There is an extremely solid scientific consensus that climate change is real and human forced. To people skeptical of this, I say go read the published science itself and don't rely on the news to interpret the published science for you. By the way, scientists DO NOT peer review each other using "petitions", they do it using PUBLISHED, PEER-REVIEWED SCIENCE JOURNALS, and you'll see no modern "skeptic denier" that can make an argument that will pass peer review.
yes climate change is real and has been going on for millions of years. at one time the world was incredibly hot and soupy. and in another time period that we call the ICe Ages it was very cold. Inofe is owned by big oil but look at interest of al gore and kofi annan if cap and trade was put in place. "human force" what evidence proves this?
@tonylee1973 The oil industry now sits on trillions of dollars of an asset base... that is TRILLIONS of dollars that have YET to be made.
As far as "Al Gore" goes, I don't listen to him. I listen to published science, and Al Gore isn't a scientist. As far as evidence of the human forcing of climate change, all you need to look at is the characteristic length of time that the natural cycles obey and compare to the time scale of recent warming compared to time scale of human activities.
@pem82sox Let me help you out here. I don't agree with every position of Inhofe, and it is true that he represents the Oil & Gas industry, just like virtually EVERY senator is in the pocket of some special interest. However, he is a stalwart fighter against socialism, multiculturalism, & BIG-BROTHER government, and... the state that he represents has one of the strongest economies in the nation. As for the creation issue, I could care less--There are far more important issues to deal with now.
In what way did Inhofe "win" on global warming? You'd think that winning would qualify as disproving the concept of global warming -- except that it's not accepted all over the world as scientific fact.
So if Inhofe is bragging about undermining efforts in the direction of what science tells us... then yeah I guess he won in showing that his ass is on the next ticket out of office.
@Edgehead10075 really Einstein? I bet you couldn't convince a whole lot of people on the hot spots of this country, but hey trying selling your Republican bullshit to Europe and the rest of the world where there hitting record temperatures. LMAO....
Climategate revealed that climatologists hid the declining temperatures to mold their agenda, despite all the lib media bullshit about climategate exonerating everybody.
@Edgehead10075 And this is probably coming from someone typical of Inhofe's demographic: believes the Earth is 4000 years old, evolution doesn't exist, and so forth. Doesn't help your credibility much.
Global warming does occur in natural cycles. Except this "cycle" has seen an anomaly of a spike upwards; and we're yet to see it return. Hmmm... anthropogenic seems likely to me.
Global temperature decreased in recent years? That explains why the ice caps have melted significantly - _ -.
I don't believe in creationism. Liberals try to marginalize AGW skeptics by putting us in that category, but we don't all belong there. The polar ice caps are actually growing, not shrinking, and so is the polar bear population regardless of what Al Gore says.
@Edgehead10075 Except what I pointed out is not a fact exclusively reported by Al Gore. Al Gore is not a scientist, he is a politician. I'm very surprised that you are going to deny that the perma-ice regions of the world HAVE seen a decline in ice mass. Scientists agree unanimously. This is not rocket science; it's obvious just by putting together pictures of glacial mass in say Greenland from 1960 vs. 2008. Common sense.
@Edgehead10075 I just googled it. And the only "news article" I saw was 1 from Fox News with less than half a page of text and one source - _ -. Yeah... if Fox News is your only scientific source then I think I'm gonna go have a more productive argument elsewhere - _ -.
If you google "polar ice caps growing," you get a lot of shit. BTW, as far as Fox goes, they're known for having a right wing bias, but they're not known for simply making up shit. They're still considered to be a "reliable source." Obviously, they'd be one of the few guys reporting this because the other networks have a liberal bias and ignore news that contradicts said bias.
@Edgehead10075 P.S. The first half of 2010 has been the hottest on record (on average around the world) in a recent report by NASA.
I can link you real data from legitimate sources. Not sure if you can do the same (as you haven't so far but still make stipulations with nothing to back them up).
On the website you will also find info I was referring to about all the INDICATORS of global warming.
June the average sea ice extent in the Arctic was the lowest on record It´s tracked (by sat.) since 1979 with a DRAMATIC DECLINE over the last 30 years. Thicker ice now only makes up 10%! That's down from 30% to 40% in the 1980s and 1990s. (!)
er.
# In fact, 2008 and? 2009 were second and third in terms of ice loss.
# Greenland is losing ice mass and the rate is accelerating.
# Antarctica is losing ice mass and the rate is accelerating.
"Debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely NONexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. The challenge, rather, appears to be how to effectively communicate this fact to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists."
sure, like rush limbaugh, fred singer, marc morono, pinnochio, the epic mountain-man few rednecks and such "competent scientist" who indeed dont even "believe" in *provable facts*,scientific methods or well accepted and important standards like *honesty*. You know...these crusaders, uuhm "climate skeptics" just make things up..since 25yrs...have foX-noise+Co behind them. So real science is a waste of time.
Their insane mass confusion-tactic is obviously successful.
His name is Richard Siegmund Lindzen. He is an atmospheric physicist and Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT. He has published more than 200 scientific papers and books.
lindzen- well known and abused (by deniers) birdie
I can show you scientist opposing relativity, cancer, aids, evolution or the concept of gravity. Does this make you not visiting a cancer specialist if you(the whole world..) has cancer? ? ? ? (thats an analogy, k?)
Lindzen btw dont opposes the greenhouse effect... ok anyways: We dump about 90million tons(!) of CO2 every 24hours(!) in the atmosphere as if it were an open sewer.
@aerobique So I guess YOU of all people understand the "nuances" of climate matters better than the large group of experts that who maintain that global warming is a great threat. Wow, I'm honored to be writing on the same page as you, a genius!
@aerobique Here is the reason anyone can tell this argument is complete crap. When one uses the term "largely nonexistent" you know they are making crap up. Which is it, dedgehead, a little or largely nonexistent or if it doesn't exist, is it just plain nonexistent. The fact is, who cares if the world is heating up by natural causes or volcanic ash or "things man is doing" shouldn't the debate be about stopping the process or is your argument, get drunk and wait for the world to end?
You have to refer to insults because you're not confident in your own views. BTW, it's spelled "whose," IDIOT. Learn to spell before you call someone else a "moron." Google "polar ice caps warming." I don't listen to Rush. BTW, speaking of Rush, talk radio host Michael Savage, who's an actual scientist, is adamant in his belief that anthropogenic global warming is a pile of bullshit.
@Edgehead10075 awww , good little boy ,you know grammar , you must have been the one sitting at home on saturday nites reading, instead of going out and getting laid like the real men, lol,and michael savage , no we are talking about real scientists , not ones who play them on the radio you MORON, and remember G W the PUSSY his lawyers also played scientists with all the data and changed all the reports but i guess you didnt ever read that did you
Wait. You're against reading? I thought that you liberals were all intellectual bookworms.
Michael Savage is a scientist and a brilliant man. BTW, there are climatologists who disagree with the AGW agenda. The President of the Czech Republic, for one. Another happens to be a brilliant professor at MIT who has studied the data.
@Edgehead10075 no but im way more for getting laid , something you dont ever do , lol, and wait you found 3 , very good lil boy, lol , WWE fan ,omg you are a moron
@Edgehead10075 and im no liberal, i am an independent registered voter ,who hates illegal aliens ,wants a strong defense and a secure border ,which when g w and republicants had power, didnt secure but let all the illegal aliens in , so they could have cheap labor, so there goes your theory huh
It's a distinction without a difference. If you came to America illegally, you should barred for life from ever being allowed to return.
It's nice that you mentioned Reagan to make it look like Democrats are to the right of him on this issue; but the fact is that when Reagan granted amnesty, it was meant to be a one-time thing. You can't keep granting amnesty over and over again.
you may not be an ignorant inbred, but you are a very hateful person. i skimmed over some of your comments and found them to be rather childish. you do realize that hate is like drinking a bottle of poison and sitting back and hoping the other person is gonna die. kinda silly. your rants are exactly what is wrong with society. we've become so polarized that namecalling and backbiting are the status qou. you're obviously intelligent. try to conduct yourself accordingly.
You know whats even funnier than this video?....... whats gonna happen like 60 years from now....... when all of you climate deniers will be EATING YOUR OWN SHIT and people will be PISSING ON SENATOR INHOFE'S GRAVE
You are so frigan correct on this one Amyx28. This pig Inhofe is a lying sack of shit. He also lies about the Stimulus Package being a waste of money, but spent it happily. It brought roughly 21,000 jobs this year to his state. He continues to say it didn't work. I loathe people like him. He is unamerican and should be voted out. He is an embarrassment to this country, but hey, most of the Republicans are. Thanks for your clever insight of this abomination.
Michaelmann, not sure what your figure is? Are you saying the country is now at 12% or ? Let me know and I can give you a better rebuttal. Because CA went from 10 percent in Dec to 9.7 percent in Jan. Going down, down, down, and come November the Democrats will take over the world, aahhhhhhh!
@Edgehead10075 since you directed this intelligent statement to me, I'll answer you. You and your tweedle dees want us to pay for your babies that you want spit out even if they were raped or incest. Ya, you are real compassionate people. I feel the love bubba. Now go back to your trailer and drink your moonshine. :)
@Edgehead10075 I'll rewrite it, you ignoramus. I'll type slowly for ya okay? You and your tweedle dee's, want people like me, who are Pro Life to pay for your babies to be born. You don't give a shit if the woman is raped or has been a victim of incest. How about if the baby is deformed? Please do let us know your address Mr. Righteous to begin deliveries of these unwanted babies. Go pound your Bible you blowhard, better yet shove it up your ass. How's that English workin for ya?
No, I'm not an ignoramus. What you typed doesn't make sense. I want you to pay for MY babies? Huh? If the woman has been raped BY ME? Read what you said. You said MY BABIES, and then you said that the woman has been raped. I can only conclude that you're saying that I raped the woman who's having my baby. You make no fucking sense. Now type it over, dipshit. I won't answer you until you make sense, you fucking mentally retarded liberal. You're proof that our public schools fail.
@Edgehead10075 I'll type it over when you pull that big fat fairytale Bible out of your fat ass. Yes my little hillbilly, you are an ignoramus. Now take your Petri dish full of Embryonic stem cells, give them all their little bitty stem cell names, dress them up real pretty and enjoy your wonderful wittle family. I'm sure you'll have time in between peddling that good old book from door to door. You are why abortion is a necessity. Now be gone sheep your herder is calling you.
I don't believe in the Bible, dipshit. All of your assumptions about me just go to show what a big piece of shit you are.
Life begins at fertilization. Show me a science book that says different. You can't. You libs are such idiots. Evidently, all of you missed it when they taught it in biology class in high school.
Anyway, you've done a nice job of sidetracking. The original point that I made was that I shouldn't have to pay for some slut's abortion. Most Americans agree with me, and the Hyde amendment IS THE LAW. You lose. Stop forcing your beliefs on my wallet.
@Edgehead10075 you Neanderthal wanna be. The stone ages are over, no more dragging women into the cave and bending them over to get your rocks off. You sanctimonious asshole think you can tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her body. Ayn Rand "An embryo has no rights. Rights do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born. The living take precedence over the not-yet-living (or the unborn)." Now get some new material, bubba.
(Sigh) First of all, the topic that I originally brought up was taxpayer funded abortion, not whether abortion itself should be legal. The taxpayers shouldn't be forced to pay for something that is morally objectionable. Period, and that's the law, at least federal law. It has nothing to do with the "rights" of the unborn, dip shit.
@Edgehead10075 go to bed, you bore me and quite frankly kiddo, I think it's past your bedtime. If you don't want to pay too fucking bad. I also pay for shit that I don't want to pay for. Such is life, dingleberry, ugh!
Nope. Too bad for you. The Hyde amendment says I don't have to pay for it. You lose. "You're boring me" = code for "I give up. You just kicked my ass."
Once again, I don't give a rat's ass what Ayn Rand had to say about this issue, so your "get some new material, bubba" line doesn't work with me. I won't get new material because I'm right and don't need to change my views, moron.
@Edgehead10075 you have such a high respect for women. What if the woman is not a slut and didn't have the choice to wear protection because a piece of low life shit put a date rape drug in her glass? What fucking planet do you live on? Women are either sluts or they're the responsible for protection. Fuck that smart respectable man that can fuck her, wash his dick off and go on to his next prey. You're out of touch with life, now go find one. You get no more responses from me, lmao
Since you won't respond, I'll say what I want. Last time I checked, a woman has the right to say "No" to a guy who doesn't bring a condom with him, so I hardly feel sorry for a woman who gets pregnant in that circumstance. Besides, no one is forcing her to raise the kid. She can have the kid adopted.
rrsrichard = sissy feminist emo man. He thinks that it'll get him the babes, but women actually prefer real men.
The stimulus package was a waste of money that has piled on the debt. The GOP actually had a better stimulus that wouldn't have cost so much. The Dems are shit, and they're in deep doo doo this November, idiot.
Noone cares about the idiotic German payed Writers, what cant even ask simple silly Questons like, Why they elect a Finance Minister, what do forget about 100 000€ in his Drawer. They need a Dutch one, what ask that.
You're really boring me with your small vocabulary of empty insults. I've had this conversation with several other people who disagreed with me but for the most part it stayed civil. We disagreed without being maliciously disagreeable. You're very boring because your "Internet tough guy" posturing is extremely silly and you apparently don't have the intellectual fortitude to back up your position. Unlike the conservatives I talked to a few days ago.
I don't really care about being "smart" I care about a person being informed/aware. That counts most with me. Even a person who is not particularly smart will have the fortitude to back up their position if they're informed. My main problem with you, aside from your very unnecessary hostility (which just makes you come off as childish and makes you seem unintelligent), is that you don't back up what you say. You just assert.
I know you probably won't believe it, because anyone can lie over the Net, but it's actually 141. I found out when I was 21 when I got access to my last aptitude test from grade school. Don't really care if you believe it or not, I know what's what.
What does the black community have to do with climate change or drilling? I'm suspicious of your reasons for asking me this question but if you must know I blame both Republicans and Democrats.
That's a vast oversimplification and parts of it are not true.
1) Urban areas switch back and forth between Democratic and Republican leadership. Neither one have really done much for the black community since the late 70s/early 80s. The GOP abandoned black people in the late 60s and the Democrats abandoned black people in the 70s.
2) Most black Americans are better off today than 40 years ago. 23% of black Americans are middle class today compared to just 5% in 1964.
3) Not to mention African-Americans are now the third wealthiest 'racial' demographic in the US and the second largest consumer group. Adding over $1 Trillion of revenue in consumption annually.
"you lack sensible rationale"
So far you haven't proven what I just said wrong. You just swore and called me a communist. That's not a rebuttal. I very well could be wrong but so far you haven't followed through on proving it.
(dot) skepticalscience (dot) com / global - cooling (dot) htm
There have been a couple of cool years during the last 2 decades but that doesn't mean there is a general cooling trend. Cooling and heating are trends. Earth's planetary weather still varies greatly from month to month and year to year on different parts of the planet.
These decades have still been hotter than the earth was during the Medieval Warm Period.
Really I don't even see what the big deal is about this topic. We all know pollution is bad and that we're going to run out of oil eventually. This problem can be solved if we start trying to switch to alternative fuels and get rid of our addiction to oil. You'd think conservatives would be for this since conservatism is about "conserving" (at least that's what the name implies).
Conserving the environment seems pretty conservative to me.
The big deal is that there is a massive financial component to the entire scam that serves to redistribute wealth, and would be disastrous to the economy. do you not see this from your tunnel? you cannot prove that any changes in climate ARE NOT from factors other than man. were there no financial component, of course, knock yourself out with your stupid windmills. the fact is, were there efficient alternative fuels the free market would have seized on them decades ago.
This has been flagged as spam show
moron, did you see the record heat in texas and the rest of the country the last two years, look up texas
drought, new mexico wilfires, geogia drought with 2010 2011 in the search terms, fools!
NOAA: 2010 Tied For Warmest Year on Record
According to NOAA scientists, 2010 tied with 2005 as the warmest year of the global surface temperature record,
beginning in 1880. This was the 34th ...
NASA - NASA Finds 2011 Ninth Warmest Year on Record
livingproofof 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3% of your Representatives in Congress honors their Oath of Office to "...support and defend the United States..." 100% of the time in the 112th Congress:S Myrick NC, Ron Paul TX, P Roe TN, B Posey FL, C Mack FL, T McClintock CA, R Labrador ID, T Huelskamp KS, T Johnson IL, W Jones NC, A Harris MD, T Graves GA, John Duncan, JR TN, Jeffery Duncan SC, J Campbell CA, J Chaffetz UT, J Amash MI, Rand Paul KY (The Freedom Index 8-8-11 sans those who voted for ndaa) Restore America RON PAUL 2012
possumpistol 1 week ago
Facts: 1) night time temps are inc. faster than daytime temps. 2) winter temps are inc. faster than summer temps. 3) heating and expansion of troposphere and cooling of stratosphere measured. If you can explain these observations without the mechanism of IR radiation absorption without CO2 be my guest.The crisis is real and delay cannot be tolerated. If we reach 450 ppm threshold we are lost as permafrost will begin to out gas methane. Dust-bowlification->food insec.->riots and political instab
MrAluminous 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Federalist Papers, Bastiat's The Law. Know the history of USA or you can't support & defend it. Restore America 2012 Ron Paul RonPaul2012dotcom 1835 “Minute” on India written by Thomas Babington Macaulay; A government cannot be wrong in punishing fraud or force, but it is almost certain to be wrong if, abandoning its legitimate function, it tells private individuals that it knows their business better than they know it themselves.
possumpistol 2 months ago
The earth cannot fix itself until it stops producing millions of new consumers daily. The "balancing out" will occur when the earth's population contracts dramatically.
bruceduece1 3 months ago
I typed wrong I left out "on it's way to be." Doesn't really matter anyway because they said when it closes it'll trap greenhouse gases and kill us, so either way we're screwed.
aquarianbabe 6 months ago
Who gives a crap? When there was a hole on the ozone we were in trouble and when the hole closed itself we were in trouble, so no matter what way we swing we're in deep crap. I think it's all bull and just another way for tree hugging liberals to impose their "expensive" life styles on the American public. Nature will heal itself. It did it before us and it will do it after us. One volcanic eruption puts more pollution in the air than 100 years worth of LA traffic.
aquarianbabe 6 months ago
@aquarianbabe The hole has not closed. The ozone layer is repairing itself because of the moratorium imposed on CFC's in aerosol sprays and other sources decided in the Montreal Protocol 24 years ago. Check your facts.
squamish4244 6 months ago
@aquarianbabe Mars use to have an atmosphere too, it was liveable, is that your idea of nature healing itself?
Shyhalu 4 months ago
@aquarianbabe is retarded.
Do your own research, people! Don't read YouTube comments that try to explain shit, as 98% of them are their own, illogical opinions. There are the other 2%, though.
TheSketchExpress 4 months ago
@TheSketchExpress I'm glad you can come up with such an astute evaluation of my IQ. In fact, I'm probably a lot smarter than you and YES, I do my research. Check it yourself. I didn't try to explain anything. I just know that the world's pollutant output is way more than humans and it manages to correct itself. If anything we're doing the earth a disservice by trying to fix and conserve everything. The earth was balancing before we got here and will be after we're gone.
aquarianbabe 4 months ago
@aquarianbabe Apologies, you're right.
<3
TheSketchExpress 4 months ago
This "man" is a vindictive and bad pilot that because of his error (pilot error) is using his legislative powers to draft a "pilots bill of rights" against the FAA that censored him for landing on a closed runway in Oct. of 2010 that was full of very frightened construction repair workers. What a horrible human and bad public servant. Most of all a terrible pilot!
golden454 6 months ago
now do you idiots get it? 300 tornadoes ripped though the Midwest is one 24 hour period. Jim the liar Imhoff is a thug baby killer in a suit. More than 500 people paid with their lives because of this lying coward. He makes me sick.
roywesthouston 8 months ago 3
He won't be around in 20 or so years and when he's gone the whole hoax about climate change will be dead.
"Time fixes everything."
wangsta25 9 months ago
Boxer is a twat!!
vambo13257 10 months ago
Those who to take from Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul.
TerrierToughGuy 1 year ago
Anyone who doesn't see neandrathal Inhofe as an oil, gas & coal industry corporatist-fascist toad -- must be blind, deaf & dumb.. and a toad as well!
marcostar57 1 year ago 2
Lol @ you liberal idiots always resorting to the word "fascist." You don't even know what it means. Weren't the bailouts that Obama voted for "fascism"? I guess that Obama is a fascist then. Lol.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 The replies I get from right-wing trolls like YOU are amazing & so amusing! (Righties always resort to using the word "socialist" & have no idea what it means)
marcostar57 1 year ago 2
For a great expose of the Cap & Trade, which Gore & his Goldman Sachs shysters are set up to cash in on
Input youtube
"The Huge Mistake Climate Change Solutions 2009"
Help stop the Carbon tax fraud, call your Senators & say "NO" to Cap & Trade!
Also tell them you want a congressional/criminal investigation of GW as it is a racketeering operation
Thisawareness 1 year ago
This is making me think i just might want to add a dome to my wall..just in case.
MrMickyMouth 1 year ago
what a retard...
Revrebrent 1 year ago
Yes, Boxer is a retard. I agree.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago 20
@Edgehead10075 if you believe inhofe you the retard
doc1917 1 year ago
Stop speaking ebonics.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Global warming is a fact - period.
The fact that it is happening at an alarming rate because of human action is also a fact.
There is no serious scientific consensus to the contrary. The only people who say otherwise are either politically motivated or ignorant.
dtstrain 1 year ago
@dtstrain - Global Warming is a THEORY.
09-10 saw the reversal of several years of sea ice loss, as well as expansion of glaciers.
Just because there's a "scientific" consensus doesn't prove anything. Also, many of the IPCC's "scientists" were ECONOMISTS, NOT meteorologists, and NOT climatologists. Thus, you're referring to studies that are fallacious. Also, you have to remember there was a "scientific" consensus once that the world was flat.
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago 2
@Slipknotyk06 Sorry that's not correct. The overwhelming consensus that (a) global warming is a fact, and (b) it is effected by human activity, is among climate scientists. While scientific consensus is not immune to mistake, it is not rational to hold another view at present because there is no other legitimate conclusion of equal weight, that isn't simply part of a politically, economically, or religiously motivated opposition. Anyone saying otherwise is lying to you.
dtstrain 1 year ago
@dtstrain - IT'S NOT A FACT. Your theory holds no real truth because the scientists that made your theory weren't even scientists in the proper field. Also, data collection methods of the UN IPCC have been determined to be incredibly poor. Sample sizes collected by the IPCC have been determined to be too small to determine climatological trends. IPCC also ignored studies with contradictory evidence to their own, even if the methodology was vastly superior to their own.
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@dtstrain - CO2science released a great video series on here that determines the relationship of CO2 to life and to global temperatures. CO2 is actually shown to have nearly an inverse relationship to temperature versus that which is claimed by IPCC. CO2 concentrations peak 800 years into ICE AGES! There are many meteorologists and climatologists that believe in cyclical climate change and believe man-made global warming is a myth, but consensus DOES NOT MAKE A FACT!
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@dtstrain - CO2science released a great video series on here that determines the relationship of CO2 to life and to global temperatures. CO2 is actually shown to have nearly an inverse relationship to temperature versus that which is claimed by IPCC. CO2 concentrations peak 800 years into ICE AGES! There are many meteorologists and climatologists that believe in cyclical climate change and believe man-made global warming is a myth, but consensus DOES NOT MAKE A FACT!
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@dtstrain You remember that volcano that erupted some months ago in, I believe, it was Iceland? I think that's the correct country. Anyway, that one belch from the earth tore down what amounted to fifty years of clean and green air. Don't think humans are responsible. We're just caught in the middle of it. If you're for the green agenda and carbon credits...well...I hope you enjoy your communist government. I don't plan to see it.
chop98 1 year ago
Yes Inhofe, you won but then there's the science. Whatever the way you paint climate science as a conspiarcy, man-made climate change is real. The only conspiracy is with your bed-fellows, the oil and coal industry.
meercatdotcom 1 year ago
Inhofe is right. So called man made global warming is indeed the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on western people. Like the latest Great Lakes satellite fiasco (you know Egg Harbour 604 Fahrenheit and tens of other boiling places there up in Wisconsin) tells us - we can't anymore trust any measurements.
Man made global warming is just pure crap and wet dream of greenies for taxing people.
tranmere789 1 year ago
@tranmere789 are you joking or serius?
Revrebrent 1 year ago
the hottest spring and summer on record in the history of time 2010 and the conservatives have their heads buried up each others asses , i think thats why they cant telll whats going on
howardsten 1 year ago
Any important issue with Boxer as the advocate will fail based on her cuntiness and the merits of the issue won't be fairly considered.
Inhofe is an idiot, she's a scunny scunt but he's still the taller midget in that room of fuckheads.
SeymourButtz99 1 year ago
In Germany, its a crime to deny the holocaust. Given what happened, its an understandable law. If only we had a way to transport people like James Inhofe into the future to see the holocaust that awaits our descendants, perhaps it would be possible to do the sensible thing now: outlaw denial of anthropogenic global warming.
I'm not saying that reasonable people can disagree on how best to address the problem. What I'm saying is that its criminal to deny that it exists.
1776independent 1 year ago
@1776independent reasonable ppl can disagree.. but the right arent the ones talking about jailing ppl or making it a crime for ppl to disagree with anthropogenic global warming, something projected in the future. comparing it to the holocaust, something that is known in the past, better be careful lefty ur totalitarian roots r starting to show. dont disagree or we jail u, lol and well show r gw films to 6 yr old children who havent had a reasonable enough science class to even understand it.
Illumified 1 year ago
@Illumified Apparently you failed to read what I wrote adequately. I made the comparison of the German holocaust and postulated equivalence in an imaginary world that included a time machine to verify the similar consequences of inaction on AGW.
You're making my point for me, 'righty,' when you start bringing 6 year olds into the discussion. Your argument is incoherent and has nothing to do with the topic.
You either trust overwhelming scientific consensus or you don't.
1776independent 1 year ago
@1776independent "perhaps it would be possible to do the sensible thing now: outlaw denial of anthropogenic global warming." lol yeah and the reason I brought up 6 yr olds is because global warming films r being shown to grade school kids who havent even had an adequate class on science in order to comprehend it, thats an easy way to spot propaganda .as far as consensus there have been plenty of overwhelming consensuses in the past ud think ud learn better by now
Illumified 1 year ago
@Illumified "ud think ud learn better by now"
Ah, English, spoken by a clown. I suppose your 'adequate class on science' in your world would be held at the Creationism Museum where one can find a giant plastic dinosaur with a saddle on its back.
So to your point about overwhelming consensuses in the past: which of these was proven incorrect? Cigarette smoking causes cancer? Gravity? E=MC2?
Would you let your child smoke? Clown.
1776independent 1 year ago
@1776independent lol down to the name calling already huh? well by science class I mean biology chemistry planetary and solar sciences, what would be involved in understanding a complex theory like anthropogenic global warming. teaching it to kids before they have had any of those classes is just ridiculous, as far as consensuses I was referring to things the church did in the middle ages but there are also plenty of modern ex. hole in the ozone, y2k, and in the 70's a terrible ice age was nigh
Illumified 1 year ago
@Illumified Hole in the ozone consensus: Proven. Y2K: Not consensus at all, just some warnings about potential problems. The 70's time magazine ice age article: um, an article is not consensus.
Any other softballs?
1776independent 1 year ago
@1776independent gravity is consensus ?? lol seriously, and for one consensus isnt an argument for or against a cause 51 % of ppl could believe the world is flat doesnt make it true 99% could believe it and it wouldnt make a difference, but lets keep talking about this and not hiding the decline or emails that show intention to manipulate the peer review process or destroy data, or how about the fact that co2( the thing plants breath) was declared a pollutant
Illumified 1 year ago
@1776independent oh and btw there were more than one article, theres one from newsweek in 1975 and these journalist didnt just make this up they got it from "scientist"
Illumified 1 year ago
There are scientists who disagree with the so-called consensus, and I don't believe in creationism.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 omg , a WWE fan , omg you are a MORON, hey here is a tidbit you might wana know, wrestling is fake, lol ,maybe thats why you think global warming is fake , lol, you FOOL. WWE and WRESTlING , OMG what are you 7?
howardsten 1 year ago
I know that it's fake. Movies and sitcoms are fake, too, so what's your point?
Your s/n is one letter off from being "Howard Stern." You have about as much credibility as he does.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 who is howard stern ?
howardsten 1 year ago
You're from America, and you've never heard of him?
I don't listen to the man, but just about everybody knows who he is. You must live under a rock. He's a pervert with a radio show.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
In other words, you're a fascist who doesn't believe in freedom of speech.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Inhofe is a jerk in many ways, and this is typical. "I rule, you suck."
He's an azzhat. But he's well loved by the other azzhats in Oklahoma.
KrK007 1 year ago
@KrK007 And you're a complete moron.
jay5775 1 year ago
@jay5775 Ah, another stupid hick comment. Typical Republitard Okie Inhofe voter right here. Jay5775. Can't handle the truth.
KrK007 1 year ago
Haha, love it, put that stupid bitch in her place.
InternetSavage 1 year ago
Whats going on usa??, Fundamentalists drive politics.
Inhofe said (in senate!) "..I BELIEVE -VERY strongly- that we ought to support Israel; that it has a right to the land..because God said! so [..] it is at this place where GOD! appeared! to Abram! and SAID, "I am giving you this land — the West Bank. "
---
"...In recent years, the corporate PR campaigns has gone viral, spawning a denial movement that is distributed, decentralized and largely immune to reasoned response...."
aerobique 1 year ago
The average American emits a ton of CO2e every 2 weeks.
A ton of CO2 is enough to fill: * 130,000 gallon milk jugs
or * An entire 2,200 square-foot house
Its emitted by: * Driving an average car about 2,000 miles * Heating, lighting, and powering the average home for a month * Sending 350 bags of trash to rot in a landfill * Running an average coal power plant for 9 seconds
Its saved by: * Taking sixty cars off the road for a day or * Growing 40 tropical trees for a year
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique
And all the plants the world over thank you for it!:)
Miatacrosser 1 year ago
@Miatacrosser
No, natures balance become completely disturbed from our co2 emissions. Every kid knows that plants absorb co2 dude... but.. when we talk about our co2 emissions we talk about burned co2 from plants stored for hundreds of million years ..we pump that all in just 100years in the atmosphere.
Using the "plant food" phrase as argument.... makes science-deniers look even more naive. lol By the way,.. check greenmans movies, learn and support him!
watch?v=vFGU6qvkmTI
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique
Deny Science? No. Deny phony Science? Yes. If you and greenman want to believe in this, fine. It's your right too. But, don't try and foist your anxiety and arrogance on me. And don't ruin my country with your chicken little religion. As with every person that's tried to persuade me with his "facts". I don't believe you. You have the whole damn thing all wrong. But trying to convince you is like trying to convince a Christian that Christ wasn't the son of God. Good Day
Miatacrosser 1 year ago
@Miatacrosser
(you)Deniers are the ones who (have to) "believe" -like a sick cult of mentally disordered sheeples. We dont call you "denier" because its bored, dude.
Btw i just investigated the freak called inhofe here.. and lol...?
Inhofes campaign ("God,Guns&Gays") donors represented the OIL&GAS ($446,900 in donations), leadership pacs ($316,720) and electric utilities ($221,654) industries/categories.
In 2010, his largest donors represented the OIL&GAS electric...
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique
Cult? Sheeples? ROTFLMAO! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! Your science is all a lie and you still won't let go. Hey guess what, dude. This hoax is a lie and you bought it hook, line, and sinker. Don't you love living in a country that you've been made to hate? That's what I love about leftist zombies. They think they're doing good but the outcome is always bad. But hey, at least you "feel" good about it. No matter how many lives it ruins. I said Good Day!!
Miatacrosser 1 year ago
@miatacrosser
Denying reality will result in real shock when the truth does hit home. As for a"world government", well I'd like to see us pulling together to address the big global issues we face.The (leftism/nwo/lol) UN is powerless due to veto rights and we are obviously losing battles to save species, eradicate poverty and provide safe drinking water and sanitation. Our global population is expanding while resources are dwindling, especially energy, water and food.
aerobique 1 year ago
People who make their living taking oil money are - by design compelled to lie on their behalf. It's such a simply concept. Temperature tracks CO2 level. My 6 year old cousin can understand that graph.
ekkeman 1 year ago
@ekkeman
People who make their living taking government grant money are-by design, compelled to come up with whatever that government agenda is. It's so simple you don't see it. My graph shows the opposite. CO2 tracks temperature(I'll bet you who's right on this and you won't win because I have real science on my side. Not the faux science that your feeding your 6 year old cousin). Oh and by the way. STOP SCARING THE CHILDREN WITH YOUR BS.
Miatacrosser 1 year ago
Global warming is a Hoax. Inhofe did win. The USA did not sign the Koyto Protocol
expertbig 1 year ago
Inhole needs to get a clue. Anthropolotical "GLOBAL WARMING" is turning out to be BS as I knew it always was. Global warming/cooling are natural. DUH.
IrenicIronist 1 year ago
Stop joking around with our future Inhofe - you need to get a life and stop working against science and the whole planet
topologyrob 1 year ago
Timothy McVeigh needs to come back from the dead and bomb the Oklahoma state house. It would be great if all the redneck politicians from that state like Inhofe would fucking die. FUCK OKLAHOMA!
1OklahomaSucks1 1 year ago
@1OklahomaSucks1 You wish you lying moronic sack of fecal matter. Bring it boy. Pussy!
jay5775 1 year ago
EcrossH and jessie glad you guys could follow the link from Huffington Post and Moveon....have you got your recent mailing from Greenpeace lately? That tinfoil is not going to stop them from reading your mind be careful be very very careful they really are after you!!!!!
quixel12 1 year ago
LOVE how Gore said that when we had really hot summer it was proof that Global Warming was occuring and then when it snowed oh thats weather don't you stupid doubters know the difference....lol what a fucking hypocrite and you morons follow everything he and his henchmen spew at you....while he is laughing all the way to the bank =P
quixel12 1 year ago
You guys are just racist bigots.The KKK was a Democratic supported group and you still have one Representative that was or still is a member in Byrd...Also you have many members of the Black Panther movement another Racist group just like all you global warming/money realignment groupies...You deny that the facts are Global Warming is a natural event ..
quixel12 1 year ago
The KKK was a Democratic supported group and you still have one Representative that was or still is a member in Byrd>>> So who cares? Both parties are vastly different today than back during the days of Reconstruction. And Byrd has apologized repeatedly for his KKK activities. You all have Trent Lott who, last I checked, never apologizes for being a racist.
cajayson8301 1 year ago
Wait a minute... it's "get a life MA'AM!"
USA4July1776 1 year ago
Inhofe is owned by big oil. There is an extremely solid scientific consensus that climate change is real and human forced. To people skeptical of this, I say go read the published science itself and don't rely on the news to interpret the published science for you. By the way, scientists DO NOT peer review each other using "petitions", they do it using PUBLISHED, PEER-REVIEWED SCIENCE JOURNALS, and you'll see no modern "skeptic denier" that can make an argument that will pass peer review.
EcrossH 1 year ago
yes climate change is real and has been going on for millions of years. at one time the world was incredibly hot and soupy. and in another time period that we call the ICe Ages it was very cold. Inofe is owned by big oil but look at interest of al gore and kofi annan if cap and trade was put in place. "human force" what evidence proves this?
tonylee1973 1 year ago
@tonylee1973 The oil industry now sits on trillions of dollars of an asset base... that is TRILLIONS of dollars that have YET to be made.
As far as "Al Gore" goes, I don't listen to him. I listen to published science, and Al Gore isn't a scientist. As far as evidence of the human forcing of climate change, all you need to look at is the characteristic length of time that the natural cycles obey and compare to the time scale of recent warming compared to time scale of human activities.
EcrossH 1 year ago
Inhofe is an idiot.
jessie74 1 year ago
Inhofe=creationist....the guy's just stupid
pem82sox 1 year ago 2
@pem82sox Let me help you out here. I don't agree with every position of Inhofe, and it is true that he represents the Oil & Gas industry, just like virtually EVERY senator is in the pocket of some special interest. However, he is a stalwart fighter against socialism, multiculturalism, & BIG-BROTHER government, and... the state that he represents has one of the strongest economies in the nation. As for the creation issue, I could care less--There are far more important issues to deal with now.
bboucharde 1 year ago
Inhofe is an embarrassment to our state and to our country.
moor4348 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Inhofe is an embarrassment to our state and to our country."
Take it from a foreigner Barbara Boxer comes across as more of nitwit.
gerjanp 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck that bitch Fuckhead Boxer
brokenarrow357 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
rub it in on that liberal hag, she's about to lose her 'tenure'
Watch Out, mean faced clipped haired libtard women are the real terrorists
ripley450 1 year ago
Wait... wait a minute!
In what way did Inhofe "win" on global warming? You'd think that winning would qualify as disproving the concept of global warming -- except that it's not accepted all over the world as scientific fact.
So if Inhofe is bragging about undermining efforts in the direction of what science tells us... then yeah I guess he won in showing that his ass is on the next ticket out of office.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago 6
Inhofe is right. There's no anthropogenic global warming. In fact, the global temperature has DECREASED in recent years.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 really Einstein? I bet you couldn't convince a whole lot of people on the hot spots of this country, but hey trying selling your Republican bullshit to Europe and the rest of the world where there hitting record temperatures. LMAO....
rrsrichard 1 year ago
Climategate revealed that climatologists hid the declining temperatures to mold their agenda, despite all the lib media bullshit about climategate exonerating everybody.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 And this is probably coming from someone typical of Inhofe's demographic: believes the Earth is 4000 years old, evolution doesn't exist, and so forth. Doesn't help your credibility much.
Global warming does occur in natural cycles. Except this "cycle" has seen an anomaly of a spike upwards; and we're yet to see it return. Hmmm... anthropogenic seems likely to me.
Global temperature decreased in recent years? That explains why the ice caps have melted significantly - _ -.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
I don't believe in creationism. Liberals try to marginalize AGW skeptics by putting us in that category, but we don't all belong there. The polar ice caps are actually growing, not shrinking, and so is the polar bear population regardless of what Al Gore says.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 Except what I pointed out is not a fact exclusively reported by Al Gore. Al Gore is not a scientist, he is a politician. I'm very surprised that you are going to deny that the perma-ice regions of the world HAVE seen a decline in ice mass. Scientists agree unanimously. This is not rocket science; it's obvious just by putting together pictures of glacial mass in say Greenland from 1960 vs. 2008. Common sense.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
The ice caps are now growing. You can look it up anywhere.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 I just googled it. And the only "news article" I saw was 1 from Fox News with less than half a page of text and one source - _ -. Yeah... if Fox News is your only scientific source then I think I'm gonna go have a more productive argument elsewhere - _ -.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
If you google "polar ice caps growing," you get a lot of shit. BTW, as far as Fox goes, they're known for having a right wing bias, but they're not known for simply making up shit. They're still considered to be a "reliable source." Obviously, they'd be one of the few guys reporting this because the other networks have a liberal bias and ignore news that contradicts said bias.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 P.S. The first half of 2010 has been the hottest on record (on average around the world) in a recent report by NASA.
I can link you real data from legitimate sources. Not sure if you can do the same (as you haven't so far but still make stipulations with nothing to back them up).
On the website you will also find info I was referring to about all the INDICATORS of global warming.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
BTW, it's pretty common knowledge that the Antarctic ice cap has been growing for quite some time.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075
shameless lies
June the average sea ice extent in the Arctic was the lowest on record It´s tracked (by sat.) since 1979 with a DRAMATIC DECLINE over the last 30 years. Thicker ice now only makes up 10%! That's down from 30% to 40% in the 1980s and 1990s. (!)
er.
# In fact, 2008 and? 2009 were second and third in terms of ice loss.
# Greenland is losing ice mass and the rate is accelerating.
# Antarctica is losing ice mass and the rate is accelerating.
aerobique 1 year ago
Your source?
Google "polar ice caps growing." Even a BRITISH newspaper has reported on it.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075
My source? THE source: NASA sattelites.
"Debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely NONexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. The challenge, rather, appears to be how to effectively communicate this fact to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists."
climate . nasa . g ov
aerobique 1 year ago 8
Fair enough. That's their view, but I've heard competent scientists say otherwise.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@edgehead
sure, like rush limbaugh, fred singer, marc morono, pinnochio, the epic mountain-man few rednecks and such "competent scientist" who indeed dont even "believe" in *provable facts*,scientific methods or well accepted and important standards like *honesty*. You know...these crusaders, uuhm "climate skeptics" just make things up..since 25yrs...have foX-noise+Co behind them. So real science is a waste of time.
Their insane mass confusion-tactic is obviously successful.
Only in america..
aerobique 1 year ago
I've heard a professor from MIT say that it's all bullshit.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075
who? a climatologist? surely not- any sources? no?
aerobique 1 year ago
His name is Richard Siegmund Lindzen. He is an atmospheric physicist and Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT. He has published more than 200 scientific papers and books.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075
lindzen - lol
lindzen- well known and abused (by deniers) birdie
I can show you scientist opposing relativity, cancer, aids, evolution or the concept of gravity. Does this make you not visiting a cancer specialist if you(the whole world..) has cancer? ? ? ? (thats an analogy, k?)
Lindzen btw dont opposes the greenhouse effect... ok anyways: We dump about 90million tons(!) of CO2 every 24hours(!) in the atmosphere as if it were an open sewer.
aerobique 1 year ago
I don't remember saying that there's no greenhouse effect. The planet Venus certainly proves that it exists.
I'd like to see a scientist who opposes gravity. Anyway, Lindzen is not just some "C" student who got a college degree. He's a professor at MIT.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@aerobique So I guess YOU of all people understand the "nuances" of climate matters better than the large group of experts that who maintain that global warming is a great threat. Wow, I'm honored to be writing on the same page as you, a genius!
Loejyrrab 1 year ago 3
@aerobique Here is the reason anyone can tell this argument is complete crap. When one uses the term "largely nonexistent" you know they are making crap up. Which is it, dedgehead, a little or largely nonexistent or if it doesn't exist, is it just plain nonexistent. The fact is, who cares if the world is heating up by natural causes or volcanic ash or "things man is doing" shouldn't the debate be about stopping the process or is your argument, get drunk and wait for the world to end?
john48martin 11 months ago
@Edgehead10075 omg , you must have your head buried up your own ass, you MORON ,actually growing , by whos standards, rush the magic junkies? lol
howardsten 1 year ago
You have to refer to insults because you're not confident in your own views. BTW, it's spelled "whose," IDIOT. Learn to spell before you call someone else a "moron." Google "polar ice caps warming." I don't listen to Rush. BTW, speaking of Rush, talk radio host Michael Savage, who's an actual scientist, is adamant in his belief that anthropogenic global warming is a pile of bullshit.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 awww , good little boy ,you know grammar , you must have been the one sitting at home on saturday nites reading, instead of going out and getting laid like the real men, lol,and michael savage , no we are talking about real scientists , not ones who play them on the radio you MORON, and remember G W the PUSSY his lawyers also played scientists with all the data and changed all the reports but i guess you didnt ever read that did you
howardsten 1 year ago
Wait. You're against reading? I thought that you liberals were all intellectual bookworms.
Michael Savage is a scientist and a brilliant man. BTW, there are climatologists who disagree with the AGW agenda. The President of the Czech Republic, for one. Another happens to be a brilliant professor at MIT who has studied the data.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 no but im way more for getting laid , something you dont ever do , lol, and wait you found 3 , very good lil boy, lol , WWE fan ,omg you are a moron
howardsten 1 year ago
How do you know what I do and don't do?
Just because I sometimes watch wrestling doesn't make me a moron.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 and im no liberal, i am an independent registered voter ,who hates illegal aliens ,wants a strong defense and a secure border ,which when g w and republicants had power, didnt secure but let all the illegal aliens in , so they could have cheap labor, so there goes your theory huh
howardsten 1 year ago
Yes, Bush was weak on illegals, but the only voices against amnesty are from the GOP. Every Dem is for it.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 no... the dem. that are for it never make it past the primaries... path to citizenship is different than anmesty the Regan pushed for.
Revrebrent 1 year ago
It's a distinction without a difference. If you came to America illegally, you should barred for life from ever being allowed to return.
It's nice that you mentioned Reagan to make it look like Democrats are to the right of him on this issue; but the fact is that when Reagan granted amnesty, it was meant to be a one-time thing. You can't keep granting amnesty over and over again.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD He won!!! He succesfully screwed us lol.
Revrebrent 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Character assassination does not hide the fact that Inhofe was right. Boxer is history!
icsept 1 year ago
he's a child stuck in a 200 year olds body who happened to be stump dumb.
ArkansasFresh 2 years ago 2
Inhofe owned that bitch!!!!LOL!!!!
maximusdecimus888 2 years ago
Inhofe is FUCKED in the head
0synesthete0 2 years ago
Inhofe is a wingnut clown.
SventheCrusader 2 years ago
you may not be an ignorant inbred, but you are a very hateful person. i skimmed over some of your comments and found them to be rather childish. you do realize that hate is like drinking a bottle of poison and sitting back and hoping the other person is gonna die. kinda silly. your rants are exactly what is wrong with society. we've become so polarized that namecalling and backbiting are the status qou. you're obviously intelligent. try to conduct yourself accordingly.
kansascomet 2 years ago
You know whats even funnier than this video?....... whats gonna happen like 60 years from now....... when all of you climate deniers will be EATING YOUR OWN SHIT and people will be PISSING ON SENATOR INHOFE'S GRAVE
amyx28 2 years ago
You are so frigan correct on this one Amyx28. This pig Inhofe is a lying sack of shit. He also lies about the Stimulus Package being a waste of money, but spent it happily. It brought roughly 21,000 jobs this year to his state. He continues to say it didn't work. I loathe people like him. He is unamerican and should be voted out. He is an embarrassment to this country, but hey, most of the Republicans are. Thanks for your clever insight of this abomination.
rrsrichard 1 year ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
rrsrichard
If you correct about job's, why are we at 12% now and a year ago we were at 10%
MichaelMann007 1 year ago
Michaelmann, not sure what your figure is? Are you saying the country is now at 12% or ? Let me know and I can give you a better rebuttal. Because CA went from 10 percent in Dec to 9.7 percent in Jan. Going down, down, down, and come November the Democrats will take over the world, aahhhhhhh!
rrsrichard 1 year ago 4
Inhofe is right. Barbara Boxer is a loon who wants to force pro-life taxpayers to pay for sluts getting abortions. She's WAY out of the mainstream.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 since you directed this intelligent statement to me, I'll answer you. You and your tweedle dees want us to pay for your babies that you want spit out even if they were raped or incest. Ya, you are real compassionate people. I feel the love bubba. Now go back to your trailer and drink your moonshine. :)
rrsrichard 1 year ago
If the babies were raped or incest? Huh? I don't get WTF you just said there. Can you type that in English next time?
I'd rather pay for someone's baby than someone's abortion. Anytime. That's because I'm a compassionate person.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 I'll rewrite it, you ignoramus. I'll type slowly for ya okay? You and your tweedle dee's, want people like me, who are Pro Life to pay for your babies to be born. You don't give a shit if the woman is raped or has been a victim of incest. How about if the baby is deformed? Please do let us know your address Mr. Righteous to begin deliveries of these unwanted babies. Go pound your Bible you blowhard, better yet shove it up your ass. How's that English workin for ya?
rrsrichard 1 year ago
No, I'm not an ignoramus. What you typed doesn't make sense. I want you to pay for MY babies? Huh? If the woman has been raped BY ME? Read what you said. You said MY BABIES, and then you said that the woman has been raped. I can only conclude that you're saying that I raped the woman who's having my baby. You make no fucking sense. Now type it over, dipshit. I won't answer you until you make sense, you fucking mentally retarded liberal. You're proof that our public schools fail.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 I'll type it over when you pull that big fat fairytale Bible out of your fat ass. Yes my little hillbilly, you are an ignoramus. Now take your Petri dish full of Embryonic stem cells, give them all their little bitty stem cell names, dress them up real pretty and enjoy your wonderful wittle family. I'm sure you'll have time in between peddling that good old book from door to door. You are why abortion is a necessity. Now be gone sheep your herder is calling you.
rrsrichard 1 year ago
I don't believe in the Bible, dipshit. All of your assumptions about me just go to show what a big piece of shit you are.
Life begins at fertilization. Show me a science book that says different. You can't. You libs are such idiots. Evidently, all of you missed it when they taught it in biology class in high school.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Anyway, you've done a nice job of sidetracking. The original point that I made was that I shouldn't have to pay for some slut's abortion. Most Americans agree with me, and the Hyde amendment IS THE LAW. You lose. Stop forcing your beliefs on my wallet.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 you Neanderthal wanna be. The stone ages are over, no more dragging women into the cave and bending them over to get your rocks off. You sanctimonious asshole think you can tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her body. Ayn Rand "An embryo has no rights. Rights do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born. The living take precedence over the not-yet-living (or the unborn)." Now get some new material, bubba.
rrsrichard 1 year ago
(Sigh) First of all, the topic that I originally brought up was taxpayer funded abortion, not whether abortion itself should be legal. The taxpayers shouldn't be forced to pay for something that is morally objectionable. Period, and that's the law, at least federal law. It has nothing to do with the "rights" of the unborn, dip shit.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 go to bed, you bore me and quite frankly kiddo, I think it's past your bedtime. If you don't want to pay too fucking bad. I also pay for shit that I don't want to pay for. Such is life, dingleberry, ugh!
rrsrichard 1 year ago
Nope. Too bad for you. The Hyde amendment says I don't have to pay for it. You lose. "You're boring me" = code for "I give up. You just kicked my ass."
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Liberals are so full of crap. They support rights for animals but not unborn humans. Wait, I thought that liberals were for "the little guy." Lmao.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Not funding abortion with tax dollars is hardly telling a woman what she can do, you IDIOT.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
1. You're ignorant of science. It's not her body; it's another living human being inside of her.
2. I don't give a shit what Ayn Rand said.
3. "Potential human being" is a made up term with no scientific basis.
4. Funny how a child has no rights until he's born, yet late term abortion is mostly illegal. Guess you lose on that, moron.
5. "Not-yet-living" is scientifically incorrect. A fetus is clearly alive. Something can't grow unless it's alive, moron.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Once again, I don't give a rat's ass what Ayn Rand had to say about this issue, so your "get some new material, bubba" line doesn't work with me. I won't get new material because I'm right and don't need to change my views, moron.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
If a woman doesn't want to have a baby, she should either
A. not be a slut, or
B. use protection, for God's sake.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 you have such a high respect for women. What if the woman is not a slut and didn't have the choice to wear protection because a piece of low life shit put a date rape drug in her glass? What fucking planet do you live on? Women are either sluts or they're the responsible for protection. Fuck that smart respectable man that can fuck her, wash his dick off and go on to his next prey. You're out of touch with life, now go find one. You get no more responses from me, lmao
rrsrichard 1 year ago
Since you won't respond, I'll say what I want. Last time I checked, a woman has the right to say "No" to a guy who doesn't bring a condom with him, so I hardly feel sorry for a woman who gets pregnant in that circumstance. Besides, no one is forcing her to raise the kid. She can have the kid adopted.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
rrsrichard = sissy feminist emo man. He thinks that it'll get him the babes, but women actually prefer real men.
The stimulus package was a waste of money that has piled on the debt. The GOP actually had a better stimulus that wouldn't have cost so much. The Dems are shit, and they're in deep doo doo this November, idiot.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
Noone cares about the idiotic German payed Writers, what cant even ask simple silly Questons like, Why they elect a Finance Minister, what do forget about 100 000€ in his Drawer. They need a Dutch one, what ask that.
Those Sycophants
Jgo1704 2 years ago
Fuck off Inhofe! How can he actually be an "elected" official. I would REALLY like to personally meet the uneducated, rednecks that voted for him!
supreme475 2 years ago
AMEN!!!!!!!
SHAMSHAM1090 2 years ago
Comment removed
dubasher 2 years ago
Nice. No logical rebuttal. Just anger.
All you're doing is lending credence to the stereotype that conservatives have low IQ.
A86 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
dubasher 2 years ago
You're really boring me with your small vocabulary of empty insults. I've had this conversation with several other people who disagreed with me but for the most part it stayed civil. We disagreed without being maliciously disagreeable. You're very boring because your "Internet tough guy" posturing is extremely silly and you apparently don't have the intellectual fortitude to back up your position. Unlike the conservatives I talked to a few days ago.
A86 2 years ago
Comment removed
dubasher 2 years ago
"you're not nearly as smart as you think you are"
I don't really care about being "smart" I care about a person being informed/aware. That counts most with me. Even a person who is not particularly smart will have the fortitude to back up their position if they're informed. My main problem with you, aside from your very unnecessary hostility (which just makes you come off as childish and makes you seem unintelligent), is that you don't back up what you say. You just assert.
A86 2 years ago
Comment removed
dubasher 2 years ago
"what is your IQ anyways"
I know you probably won't believe it, because anyone can lie over the Net, but it's actually 141. I found out when I was 21 when I got access to my last aptitude test from grade school. Don't really care if you believe it or not, I know what's what.
What does the black community have to do with climate change or drilling? I'm suspicious of your reasons for asking me this question but if you must know I blame both Republicans and Democrats.
A86 2 years ago
Comment removed
dubasher 2 years ago
That's a vast oversimplification and parts of it are not true.
1) Urban areas switch back and forth between Democratic and Republican leadership. Neither one have really done much for the black community since the late 70s/early 80s. The GOP abandoned black people in the late 60s and the Democrats abandoned black people in the 70s.
2) Most black Americans are better off today than 40 years ago. 23% of black Americans are middle class today compared to just 5% in 1964.
A86 2 years ago
3) Not to mention African-Americans are now the third wealthiest 'racial' demographic in the US and the second largest consumer group. Adding over $1 Trillion of revenue in consumption annually.
"you lack sensible rationale"
So far you haven't proven what I just said wrong. You just swore and called me a communist. That's not a rebuttal. I very well could be wrong but so far you haven't followed through on proving it.
"your science is flawed"
Like what?
A86 2 years ago
you've already contended on multiple occasions that the earth is not in a cooling period, which is absolutely false.
dubasher 2 years ago
It's not false:
(dot) skepticalscience (dot) com / global - cooling (dot) htm
There have been a couple of cool years during the last 2 decades but that doesn't mean there is a general cooling trend. Cooling and heating are trends. Earth's planetary weather still varies greatly from month to month and year to year on different parts of the planet.
These decades have still been hotter than the earth was during the Medieval Warm Period.
A86 2 years ago
Really I don't even see what the big deal is about this topic. We all know pollution is bad and that we're going to run out of oil eventually. This problem can be solved if we start trying to switch to alternative fuels and get rid of our addiction to oil. You'd think conservatives would be for this since conservatism is about "conserving" (at least that's what the name implies).
Conserving the environment seems pretty conservative to me.
A86 2 years ago
The big deal is that there is a massive financial component to the entire scam that serves to redistribute wealth, and would be disastrous to the economy. do you not see this from your tunnel? you cannot prove that any changes in climate ARE NOT from factors other than man. were there no financial component, of course, knock yourself out with your stupid windmills. the fact is, were there efficient alternative fuels the free market would have seized on them decades ago.
dubasher 2 years ago