I've confronted the same problem below. I've just followed Prof. and I got in trouble. I'm not sure but the sigma matrix has to be sqrt(32) and -sqrt(18). Acutally (sigma1)^2=32 and (sigma2)^2=18 so that we cannot say sigma1=sqrt(32) and sigma2=sqrt(18) because they could be minus.
i had this problem with SVD, since v and -v is the same eigenvector my jacobi routine returned valid data but in SVD it does matter which one i'll use, so i ended up getting wrong decomposition (maybe that's the cause of the error in first example on that lecture) i ended up calculating only 'U' and finding 'V' from (U,S and M)
I've confronted the same problem below. I've just followed Prof. and I got in trouble. I'm not sure but the sigma matrix has to be sqrt(32) and -sqrt(18). Acutally (sigma1)^2=32 and (sigma2)^2=18 so that we cannot say sigma1=sqrt(32) and sigma2=sqrt(18) because they could be minus.
ysn1216 2 years ago
Comment removed
ysn1216 2 years ago
Comment removed
ysn1216 2 years ago
i had this problem with SVD, since v and -v is the same eigenvector my jacobi routine returned valid data but in SVD it does matter which one i'll use, so i ended up getting wrong decomposition (maybe that's the cause of the error in first example on that lecture) i ended up calculating only 'U' and finding 'V' from (U,S and M)
death0intj 2 years ago
SVD is so good. Sphere to ellipsoid, big pimpin. So many proofs become trivial if you just consider the SVD.
mazemaster225 3 years ago
Terrible camerawork (did they keep falling asleep?!) but great lecture!
itsthebrod 3 years ago
especially for nonsquare matrices, svd provides a better way to calculate pseudo inverse of the given matrix.
KurtlarOlmez 3 years ago
svd is a very important method
i have used this technique in calculating inertia matrices for a humanoid robot
thank you professor
KurtlarOlmez 3 years ago