Added: 4 years ago
From: MIT
Views: 8,521
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I've confronted the same problem below. I've just followed Prof. and I got in trouble. I'm not sure but the sigma matrix has to be sqrt(32) and -sqrt(18). Acutally (sigma1)^2=32 and (sigma2)^2=18 so that we cannot say sigma1=sqrt(32) and sigma2=sqrt(18) because they could be minus.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • i had this problem with SVD, since v and -v is the same eigenvector my jacobi routine returned valid data but in SVD it does matter which one i'll use, so i ended up getting wrong decomposition (maybe that's the cause of the error in first example on that lecture) i ended up calculating only 'U' and finding 'V' from (U,S and M)

  • SVD is so good. Sphere to ellipsoid, big pimpin. So many proofs become trivial if you just consider the SVD.

  • Terrible camerawork (did they keep falling asleep?!) but great lecture!

  • especially for nonsquare matrices, svd provides a better way to calculate pseudo inverse of the given matrix.

  • svd is a very important method

    i have used this technique in calculating inertia matrices for a humanoid robot

    thank you professor

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more