you must have some driver problems and stuff cause i have a pentium D930 at 3.5Ghz and a 6600gt at 580/1200 and my score is 73000 u need to find your sweet spot when i first build my rig i was getting 57000 but after a little playing around and twiks i got a wopping 73,000. i think i broke the world record for the 6600gt lol
ok i have a 1 geforce 7600gs by gigabyte 512mb of 266 and a athlon 64 3500+ at 2.2 ghz.. mine pcie x16 i hit about 65,000 so like.. in sli i can totaly beat your scores in sli wih this card.. somethings holding you back!
One might be a lil faster then the other even if they are both clocked the same cause its how the card got off the production line mainly. I hope this all helps.
So in other words the extra 4 pipes and the extra 256 mb of ram didnt do aything at all, in fear that is but in 3dmark 05 I belive is what I also tested it on, the score improved by couple hundred points. not much of a gain though. But even if you have 2 7800gt from evga for example at the same clock speed, no 2 cards are going to have same indentical performance.
So when everything was set at the same exact speed. I launched fear with the 7900gtx with max settings and 1600X1200 resolution. during the first level, next to the barrel with the fire, you will notice quite of bit fps dips. So I wanted to see if my fps would change from both cards. And guess what folks, even with both different cards, the fps stayed the same.
I wanted to do something very curious. Before I had a 7900gtx I had a 7800gt. I had the speed on my 7900gtx set at the same frequency as the 7800gt. both are evga cards. I wanted to see if the extra 4 pipes and the extra 256 megs of extra ram made any difference in fear,3dmark,etc.
All this experiment was doing everything on my own time. And I never knew about about this stuff until I did my own experiment. Never even researched about this stuff. Although when new cards comes out of course I look at the fps and stuff. Just to let everyone know I did this one experiment as I was very curious of what kind of performance I would get. I can only write so much per line so look at the next line.
Oh when I was mentioning about fear about staying at the same fps no matter what speed I was running it on with the amd 3700+ thats with ALL eye candy turned to the max. on with 1600X1200 resolution.
For example In Fear I had an amd 3700+ oced at 2.8ghz+ and my fps stayed the same as it did at 2.2ghz,all the way down to 800mhz. But like I said all games are going to run differently.
But some applications are different, take lineage2 mmorpg for example, even at 1600X1200 with 16Xaf 8Xaa I still get plenty of benefit from overclocking my cpu, I havent tried conroe with L2 yet going to soon though. some games like fear,oblivion,etc at 1600X1200 resolution with all eye candy turned on, cpu speed doesnt mean jack doodle doo. It will at very low poopie resolution.
now if you have your settings at 1600X1200+ resolution,16af 8X or more aa,image quality set to highest,etc. then sli will prove useful in this benchmark but at 1024X768 default resolution its morely cpu depedent then anything.
Sli is completely uselss with this benchmark at default resolution. At default settings this benchmark is highly cpu dependent. Just use one 7900gtx even though the 512mb goes to waste with this benchmark at default settings, alot of games dont use 512mb for that matter to begin with, and fire up a conroe e6600 oced to 3.6ghz+ and I bet your score will blow your mind out the water. Cpu in this benchmark makes a world of difference. Try it:one conroe cpu and a geforce 7 :).
SLI should be run at high resoultions 1280x1024,1600x1200, or higher. If you run at 1024x768 then you are basically wasting GPU resources. In other words you just spend a sh*tload of moolaa just for nothing.
good god i only get like 12000 with an nvidia geforce fx 5500 256mb pci 256bit with intel pentium 4 2.00ghz 400mhz fsb.. and 512mb of 266mhz ram.. GOOD GOD thats fast as fuck.. Mines slow now im sad!
i heard the ps3 will be using an nvidia chip called the RSX which is more powerful then 2 sli nvidia 6800 ultra...and it is fater then the 7800gtx....and by seeing the e3 videos of the next gen games ps3 showed i was shocked...and yet two 7800 must me atleast 20% stronger then the rsx yet the RSX looks much better...i say stop pc gaming and get a load of next gen consoles...even the 360 using an ATI chip called the xeon is stronger then a x1800 card...mightest well get the next gen consoles.
Also remember people can cheat on benchmarks with rivatuner. Alter the mip map lod bias. Mine is always in neutral when I do all of my benches. Also max frames to render ahead is always set at 255 with vsynch turned off when doing all graphic benchmarking.
I get about 106K with one 7900GTX. remember playing at that resolution 1024X768 with no quality settings is moving towards cpu favor then gpu. sli mode under 1024X768 with minimal quality settings is a waste. best thing to try for benchmarks is 3dmark05 or 3dmark06.
I dont get it, you got about 76000 on Aquamark3 w/ 2 7800GTXs in SLI, but I'm getting aobut 80000 with a single X1800XT out of the box. Are you sure you have this rig set up right? Maybe you're experiencing bottlenecking, because two 7800GTXs should be putting out much larger numbers than that.
WTF I got one 6800gt and get 65,486 on that you mean to tell me that with all that power thats all your getting? I know someone with one 7900gt and he gets 85,000 or so! Not bashing just wonderg.
i this a game
m14g 3 years ago
Aquamark ist CPU lastig ihr noops, da ist die Grafikkarte eher egal
tobias100 3 years ago
your comp sucks
Wujin88 4 years ago
u suck
gamerjinho 3 years ago 2
not as good as id expect, wat cpu u hav? and dat gfx score is freaking low, iv seen many pcs wid 8600gt score higher.
Gauntletbloggs 4 years ago
i have a ATI X1900XT and my score is 87.673
RulezXT 4 years ago
It also depends on wich CPU you have, not only the GPU. I reckon you have a better CPU and/or more RAM memmory. But you both have some nice score`s
Hawkwood777 4 years ago
you must have some driver problems and stuff cause i have a pentium D930 at 3.5Ghz and a 6600gt at 580/1200 and my score is 73000 u need to find your sweet spot when i first build my rig i was getting 57000 but after a little playing around and twiks i got a wopping 73,000. i think i broke the world record for the 6600gt lol
ArmenianLegend 4 years ago
My sons semperon get 67000 with an asus v9999 ultra deluxe.
My pc gets 183k but ive seen one here where someone gets 212k.
TheDADDY20007 5 years ago
thats terrable for 7800gtxs in sli!
sublime0 5 years ago
LOL? ahahhaa i get 77,540 w/ a SINGLE 7950GT vmodded...
pistolpete69916 5 years ago
wtf... i have a 2.8 ghz pent d with 512 ram and bfg a 7600gt oc and i got only 4.7k, how is that possible?
crazyaslovakian 5 years ago
*47k
crazyaslovakian 5 years ago
because pentium d's suck! :)
sublime0 5 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nigger NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGG NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER
crazyaslovakian 3 years ago
ich brauche das lied!!!
S11S2006 5 years ago
an my score is 96000
ryaniowa 5 years ago
and my score is 96000
ryaniowa 5 years ago
very bad. i have 6800 ultra sli wit an Amd athlon 64 3700+ @ 2,8ghz
ryaniowa 5 years ago
Ill still with 1 8800 LMFAO
irleet 5 years ago
i get 55,000 stcok and 70 to 75,000 ocd IM GOOD..<< HAS A 7600gs
sublime0 5 years ago
ok i have a 1 geforce 7600gs by gigabyte 512mb of 266 and a athlon 64 3500+ at 2.2 ghz.. mine pcie x16 i hit about 65,000 so like.. in sli i can totaly beat your scores in sli wih this card.. somethings holding you back!
sublime0 5 years ago
watch?v=cPVFtf2BkSU
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
Go to this link: Aquamark3 benchmark w/intel e6600@3.8GHZ
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
One might be a lil faster then the other even if they are both clocked the same cause its how the card got off the production line mainly. I hope this all helps.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
So in other words the extra 4 pipes and the extra 256 mb of ram didnt do aything at all, in fear that is but in 3dmark 05 I belive is what I also tested it on, the score improved by couple hundred points. not much of a gain though. But even if you have 2 7800gt from evga for example at the same clock speed, no 2 cards are going to have same indentical performance.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
So when everything was set at the same exact speed. I launched fear with the 7900gtx with max settings and 1600X1200 resolution. during the first level, next to the barrel with the fire, you will notice quite of bit fps dips. So I wanted to see if my fps would change from both cards. And guess what folks, even with both different cards, the fps stayed the same.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
I wanted to do something very curious. Before I had a 7900gtx I had a 7800gt. I had the speed on my 7900gtx set at the same frequency as the 7800gt. both are evga cards. I wanted to see if the extra 4 pipes and the extra 256 megs of extra ram made any difference in fear,3dmark,etc.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
All this experiment was doing everything on my own time. And I never knew about about this stuff until I did my own experiment. Never even researched about this stuff. Although when new cards comes out of course I look at the fps and stuff. Just to let everyone know I did this one experiment as I was very curious of what kind of performance I would get. I can only write so much per line so look at the next line.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
Now If I had my amd a64 speed at 600mhz now it was starting to lose some fps but not drastically.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
Oh when I was mentioning about fear about staying at the same fps no matter what speed I was running it on with the amd 3700+ thats with ALL eye candy turned to the max. on with 1600X1200 resolution.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
For example In Fear I had an amd 3700+ oced at 2.8ghz+ and my fps stayed the same as it did at 2.2ghz,all the way down to 800mhz. But like I said all games are going to run differently.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
But some applications are different, take lineage2 mmorpg for example, even at 1600X1200 with 16Xaf 8Xaa I still get plenty of benefit from overclocking my cpu, I havent tried conroe with L2 yet going to soon though. some games like fear,oblivion,etc at 1600X1200 resolution with all eye candy turned on, cpu speed doesnt mean jack doodle doo. It will at very low poopie resolution.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
now if you have your settings at 1600X1200+ resolution,16af 8X or more aa,image quality set to highest,etc. then sli will prove useful in this benchmark but at 1024X768 default resolution its morely cpu depedent then anything.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
Sli is completely uselss with this benchmark at default resolution. At default settings this benchmark is highly cpu dependent. Just use one 7900gtx even though the 512mb goes to waste with this benchmark at default settings, alot of games dont use 512mb for that matter to begin with, and fire up a conroe e6600 oced to 3.6ghz+ and I bet your score will blow your mind out the water. Cpu in this benchmark makes a world of difference. Try it:one conroe cpu and a geforce 7 :).
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
i get more points with a single 7800gt o.Ô
w3rw0lf 5 years ago
^yeah, ill just stick to Ati cards you get way 'more bang for you're buck' with them.
i mean with a 700 pro i ran COD 2 with HDR realy smooth.
stringslayer 5 years ago
SLI should be run at high resoultions 1280x1024,1600x1200, or higher. If you run at 1024x768 then you are basically wasting GPU resources. In other words you just spend a sh*tload of moolaa just for nothing.
clickclick111 5 years ago
i get like 100,000 lol but hey turn the aa off and find out how much better scores your get!
sublime0 5 years ago
good god i only get like 12000 with an nvidia geforce fx 5500 256mb pci 256bit with intel pentium 4 2.00ghz 400mhz fsb.. and 512mb of 266mhz ram.. GOOD GOD thats fast as fuck.. Mines slow now im sad!
sublime0 5 years ago
GEFORCE 7950 XTX WILL PWN ALL GFX CARDS
sicktricks 5 years ago
so is a ATI X1900XTX stronger or Nvidia Geforce 7800 GTX stronger
ryuarashi 5 years ago
i heard the ps3 will be using an nvidia chip called the RSX which is more powerful then 2 sli nvidia 6800 ultra...and it is fater then the 7800gtx....and by seeing the e3 videos of the next gen games ps3 showed i was shocked...and yet two 7800 must me atleast 20% stronger then the rsx yet the RSX looks much better...i say stop pc gaming and get a load of next gen consoles...even the 360 using an ATI chip called the xeon is stronger then a x1800 card...mightest well get the next gen consoles.
rahman212 5 years ago
whats better ati cards or nvidia.....SLI or Crossfire
rahman212 5 years ago
My cpu amd 3700+ 2.2ghz(stock) @ 2.90ghz(over fx57 speed)
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
Also remember people can cheat on benchmarks with rivatuner. Alter the mip map lod bias. Mine is always in neutral when I do all of my benches. Also max frames to render ahead is always set at 255 with vsynch turned off when doing all graphic benchmarking.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
I get about 106K with one 7900GTX. remember playing at that resolution 1024X768 with no quality settings is moving towards cpu favor then gpu. sli mode under 1024X768 with minimal quality settings is a waste. best thing to try for benchmarks is 3dmark05 or 3dmark06.
yourtubeyourass21 5 years ago
7950gtx is way faster than 7900gt
btw look at the date it posted it says november 08.2005, no 7900gt yet at that time....
ianlordwin 5 years ago
I dont get it, you got about 76000 on Aquamark3 w/ 2 7800GTXs in SLI, but I'm getting aobut 80000 with a single X1800XT out of the box. Are you sure you have this rig set up right? Maybe you're experiencing bottlenecking, because two 7800GTXs should be putting out much larger numbers than that.
cApNhOwDy 5 years ago
I agree w/ jackalopeater i get a bigger # with a single Evga 7900gt Super Clocked wtf????
pablonaranjo 5 years ago
The 7900GT is faster than the 7800GTX 256MB.
clickclick111 5 years ago
WTF I got one 6800gt and get 65,486 on that you mean to tell me that with all that power thats all your getting? I know someone with one 7900gt and he gets 85,000 or so! Not bashing just wonderg.
jackalopeater 5 years ago
dude my 6600gt pci-e got 91.654 oc'd with a64 3200+ at 2.1ghz
2fast4all 5 years ago
DAMN:( i wish i could afford high end cards
kevnca 5 years ago
man i can't wait till i get other 7800gtx...
arsis67 6 years ago
HOLY FUCK IM JELLOUS i only have a 6800gt 256mb i do have an SLI motherboard but even if i do get another one it wil only be as good as one 7800gtx
03hastingsa 6 years ago
niiiice...i wish i had me a rig like that
killuminati96 6 years ago
GTX 512? or 256?
Metallica 6 years ago