How to Make a Universe - Part 1

[yoda6523]

So, therefore Nicola Tesla was right all along! The Universe is not expanding! The light simply reverts back to the primal substance; The Enfolding Positron- Waves of the Quantum Anti-matter Astral Light. The same waves that forms our thoughts and feelings, and in turn; our "unfolding electron out-waves." An atom or group of atoms enfolding and unfolding moments of spacetime.

[nickharvey7]

It is a very beautiful theory, but could the flow of these EM waves form what we see and feel as the flow of time itself?

The absorption forming the future and the emission forming the past a process of continuous change or creation that we and can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

[97kevinhuanle]

How to make your own Universe:

1. Go to the store

2. Go buy the Universe-Making kit

3. Create it.

4. Stylize it.

Congratulations! You've made your own universe! Now enjoy your new universe, you jackass!

LMAO

[firepoi83]

hi my name is jason i have only watched a few minutes of your video and i already know you have come to the same conclusion i have i am dying to converse with someone who can conceptualize how everything we see before us is manifested in our consciousness will you please contact me email is firepoi83@yahoo.com thank you

[ssssaaafff]

Thank you for your view point, I learned this is a electric universe and not a gravity based one.This so much like the movie Matrix of a holographic vibrational made dimension. In the movie, man was harvested for their electric current. But if you study Jordan Maxwell studies of word use from ancient times you can see what they mean. The river has a current(energy) contained by its banks. Man is given paper money(currency) which he makes real energy by his labor which is kept in banksters banks

[granddad2002]

Relativity has flourished very well. What is wrong with 'BBT'? It's not just the interpretation, but the predictions that validate these theories. As far as 'making up' new features... new data comes in and theories are refined. QM and what science has discovered about the structure and forces of nature are born out of these inquiries.

[artynz]

@granddad2002 The BBT requires new parameters for every new type of observation. This is the statistical characteristic of something that is being fitted up rather than being real. Recently a very good peer-reviewed paper was published showing this to be so.

[granddad2002]

It's interesting. But I've heard the late Dr. Ivan Browning say the we still have an evolved version of 'Aether Theory', It's known as the 'Space/Time Continuum'

and 'The Vacuum' is one the the most complicated states in Nature. If you can tune a 'vacuum', I think that would be major evidence for another theory of the origin of the Universe.

[lilraskaln1]

eathor doesnt exist :D

[Atomraider]

I dont know what to think about this.

If the theory of the expanding space, big bang and dark energy is so obviously false, then why dont the scientific community realise it?

But if they dont accept it for some reason then you or someone else should explain it to them by scientific methods and experiments.

Please someone explain me why it isnt happening.

What I see is only a few people mostly only on the internet are talking about this theory without almost any kind of media, university backup.

[liteovershadows]

@Atomraider The reason is loss. Millions of careers/jobs are dependent on the big bang theory and evolution. I think it might be a matter of monetary issues rather than truth. It can be viewed as the collapse of one theory and going back to square 1 or 2(which would probably produce even more jobs).Then again i'm only 21 years old and probably don't really know. It just seems to me that the world is too reliant on the words any man that is socially accepted in the scientific world as credible

[hartejoseph]

in stairs out stairs

[hartejoseph]

And the question still is what is the medium of space

[MarcusCardiff]

My head hurts even trying to think down to your level

[Etimespace]

I know how visible universe born and how visible universe matter/energy really moving in space allready been there!

Check out my new Etimespace videos!

.

[Etimespace]

1. Scientific experiments

The argument about the expanding space is an empty argument! There is no way

to make scientific experiments with a space. The argument about expanding

space is not science. It is a religion!

The thing that particules radiate their energy is not an empty claim.

Particules can be examined and make scientifical experiment with them and

this way proof this claim to be true.

[Etimespace]

2. Let´s take long chutes from different materials into the space and place

telescopes to them to observe some known place of a star. If the energy that

comes to the chutes makes the photons moving in the chute to bend towards

the chute, we can this way observe that this star concerned seems to be in a

different place than it is known to be!

[Etimespace]

3. The sun does not curve the space. The energy coming towards the sun makes

photons passing by the sun to bend towards the sun, because the hot / thick,

small and little exterior surface possessing particules do not interact with

the photons passing by the sun!

[sasho54]

This is incredible! I have achieved nearly the same ideas through my education in physics. I'll be very gratefull if you can tell me if gravity is also a tension effect in the aether. Also why electron and positron pair occurs at energy (respectively frequency) of 2x511 keV: how exact should be dosed this energy (the lower level, for slow particles) and what do we know about the details of the anihilation proces? What about the spin? And are there vortices in aether except the standing waves?

[artynz]

In my view, gravity results from the imbalance between the in and out parts of the standing waves of matter. That in turn results form the non-linearity of waves which causes harmonic formation with energy always gradually moving to smaller scales.

[artynz]

If the aether were a fluid then there would be vortices, but I prefer the idea of "spherical rotation" (do a search) as an explanation as this works in a tensile aether. So e- e+ production requires sufficient incoming energy to create two such opposite standing waves and anihilation is the reverse.

[sasho54]

"So e- e+ production requires sufficient incoming energy"

But how exactly this energy has been measured to be?

[artynz]

This is well understood in standard theory to be the sum of the two particles energy.

[sasho54]

O. K. ,but how certain has to be dosed this energy to create a pair , for example if a pair of not moving (without kinetic energy) electron and positron ocurs at 2x511 keV, then could it ocur at 2x510.999 keV? How certainly that has been measured - the acuracy of the last experiment about this.

[artynz]

@sasho54 Sorry about slow response. Just found this. It can occur at 2x510.999 keV but not 2x510.998 keV.

[amazingindividual]

typically waves are waves 'in' something so for this theory to work you'd been some kind of base particle and matter, maybe aether or something, that these waves could behave as they do in. Or some kind of common medium throughout space, which could be the case if there are higher dimensions that intersect with our universe and create a tangible fabric.

[artynz]

I agree that waves are in something, which I prefer to call aether. I see no need for higher dimensions - recognizing that c varies with the local tension of the aether will produce the effects of general relativity.

[mikoden461]

I'd like to reproduce your vibrating water dish experiment. Can you provide details?

[artynz]

Links aren't possible here, so search "ray tomes cymatics" and you should find the page on my web site with the set up that I used. It is ray(dot)tomes(dot)biz/cymatics­(dot)htm

[YogiToad]

I enjoy your vids very much.

[MattBlytheTheOne]

the formula for the universe is simple....SPIRIT...the universe is made up of thoughts! "as a man thinketh so he shall be" same thing with the universe only we didn't think it up God did ;)

[artynz]

I don't disagree with you as far as this goes. Certainly what we think is behind our words and actions. Buddha taught this same thing. He said to guard our thoughts at all times and live in a state of love and compassion. Excellent advice.

From a physics point of view though, this doesn't help us to work out what happens in the wider universe. Maybe though we should give that up and meditate until we have pure minds.

[MattBlytheTheOne]

that's an excellent idea! when are minds are clear we can receive the answers through revelation...to analyse a problem is to resist The Solution :)

[FIGHTFANNERD3]

your stupid

[MattBlytheTheOne]

@FIGHTFANNERD3 hmmm

[jroubidoux]

Dear Artynz,

Checkout this MIT presentation! "The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces" presented by Frank Wilczek.

[artynz]

Thanks.

[Poetickc]

Thank you sir!

[vwguyaz87]

Whoa shit, I just accidently generated a universe

[nickharvey7]

Is electromagnetic radiation the medium for the propagation of these standing waves?

[artynz]

You can think of it either as e/m waves or as vibrations in an aether which are equivalent (as shown by Maxwell). However I would say "waves" rather than "radiation" just to be a little bit more inclusive.

[herrerik]

This guy looks a bit like god. Maybe HE did create the universe? It makes sense to me. I want easy answers.

[artynz]

Do you mean me? Well, if I made it I forgot about that! ;-)

[nickharvey7]

Harmonics Theory could explain why we have beauty in the Universe! the standing waves will create sets of fractal self-similarities. Waves by their nature have to move are standing waves moving through space but not time?

This is a very beautiful theory it will take a beautiful theory to explain our Universe.

[kamalmichael]

agree with you. love your work

[andy7666]

"G'day! - Heres one I made earlier.." I really wouldn't be supprised! ^_^ An excellent source of knowledge!

[genebeards12212012]

i agree with this, standing waves i find can intack large amounts of energy. were as waves that move left or right can not. i have been playing around with a signal genarater and a amp.

[toasted2009]

THANK YOU!

[brixism]

Thanks for the interesting concepts.

[marsCubed]

It's like you grasped a few big concepts but have yet to get some of the really significant subtleties. IT does not make sense to think of light, a photon, as either a particle or a wave, except they sometimes seem like those to our 'classical' senses. A photon is a quanta of action. it DEFINES time space, it is energy density as lenght. consider that for a photon, which is like a packet of distance and time, time and distance do not exist. waves and particles are what we measure it as.

[marsCubed]

we are not missing definitions of matter, we are missing a quantum gravity.

All other phenomena in nature are handled well within QM and modern physics.

Your video really speaks of a poverty of knowledge. There are many excellent lectures about physics at all levels on Berkeley, MIT and Stanford university channels on youtube, which I am sure will definitely help you a lot.

crackpot theories about quantum gravity welcome btw, someone needs to come up with some working mind experiments for this.

[artynz]

See my comment about 4 above here.

[marsCubed]

It is not that it is a wave or a particle. Measurement itself becomes part of the wave function and has meaning here.

Energy; the stuff we can measure, pops out in discreet packets.

think of it as a sphere, but you get a packet; a particle; climbing over a gradient then. a quanta of energy.

it is a fundamental property of matter that it is both depending on how you measure (or think of) it.

but the geometry can be much more complex than a single simple sphere.

electrons are spinors and solitons.

[artynz]

I am not sure what the "it"s that you are referring to. If it is photons, then what I am saying is that there is no such thing as "a photon in flight". The quantization exists only at the time of emission and absorption. It does not exist in flight as between the emission and absorption (which may be years apart) there is simply the continuous development of the e/m fields according to Maxwell's equations.

The discreteness is related to configurations of matter and how they change.

[marsCubed]

As I understand this, unless we are seeing energy then the existence of a particle has no physical meaning, the values are imaginary.

One way I have been advised to visualize this is that entanglement is a line in 4 dimensions.

[artynz]

You are right that what is described does not directly have physical meaning. This physics, as any other, is making a model which makes what we do observe easier to comprehend.

There is nothing mysterious in entanglement. It is simply that a single emission event produces waves that go in many directions so that the phase of the parts are related even after being refracted etc. The phase of multiple waves (from multiple emission events) are generally unrelated and so not entangled.

[BigNewGames]

Yes, they are related, maybe that is why full grown galaxies were found at the extents of our universe, 14bly away at the red shift end, instead of background radiation, see HST UDF images. Even though light travels at such distances, as a wave it has a timeless connection to the event, quantum entanglement, so we see the galaxies as they are now not 14 billion years ago. A physicist professor once said that he suspected light happened in an instant. No, but the quantum connection is timeless.

[YogiToad]

thanx ye for these truthful videos.

[streetcornerjames74x]

looking at recent video image of an electron immediately before watching this, I thought its a wave.

Its serendipitous to see this right after, and I think you might be right.

[weboh2]

Do you consider Einstein's photon particles to be part of the ether?

[artynz]

weboh2, sorry I missed this before.

Yes, photons are part of the electromagnetic field which is how we see the aether. However I think there is unclear thinking on photons. There is quantization only at emission and absorption by particle structures (ions, atoms and molecules) but in between the e-m field behaves continuously. Search "drip model of light".

[hollowquark]

Ray,

Great discussion. Here is proof that shows electrons are made of waves: an electric field will interfere with gamma rays of the same wavelength as compton wavelength of electron (.0024 nm) because the E-field is the result of many standing-wave electrons that interfere with the gamma rays of the same wavelength. The emitted gamma rays cross the E-field path and the geiger counter shows inteference (reduction in count). See signaldisplay dotcom (/)electric dot html

[artynz]

Thanks, nice reference.

[daveymilla]

top stuff. One can easily imagine amazing electrical experiments to control matter with those ideas.

Patterns of interference.Locus' of influence.

Holographic principles. The Gift of All. Forever mysterious. Existence. It Is.

[6thCreated]

yes standing waves are the key.

[artynz]

Welcome to the club. There are a number of people who arrived at this independently - they had to because they are not told about it at university or school. However with the internet there is a chance for another generation to build on what has been found.

IMO Schroedinger and de Broglie did understand this but they got over-ruled by Bohr etc.

[6thCreated]

Yes I find that your theories are spot on with mine. I am a sound engineer and not that great at higher math so my ideas were and are purely philosophical and theoretical. But your's and others equations and proofs really confirm that we are all on to something here. Frequency and amplitude seem to be the keys to all 3 dimensional matter. Really exiting stuff.

[tixch2000]

I have been a physicist (well you never stop to be anyway) that for a while and was quite disappointed by the increasing complexity of the actual models. I am like Einstein, Bohm, and others who like simplicity and dare to look at the things 'as they are' instead of looking down towards their ego.

Well to say, this wave theory is very nice and make full sense to me, while I still have many questions related to that.

Do you have a web site? Any publications? email?

Patrick

[artynz]

Good comments.

YouTube does not allow URLs in comments. You can find a lot of my stuff by putting "wobbly universe" into google. My main web site is ray(dot)tomes(dot)biz and my email ray(at)tomes(dot)biz but I have stuff all over that you can find from there. Web site, Blogs, StumbleUpon, Flickr and oh yes, YouTube.

[airc123]

Compton's experiment convinced physicists that light can behave as a stream of particles whose energy is proportional to the frequency. I still would like to know about charge in the standing wave theory.How do standing waves make charge!If mass is a standing wave packet how do they produce charge?

[artynz]

See my video on WSM. My cymatics experiments and other people's oscillon experiments pretty much convince me that charge is all to do with phase. Positive and negative charges are at opposite points in the cycle at any time.

It may well be that what quantum physicists call "colour" is also about phase, in which case there will be three phases 120 degrees apart.

[airc123]

Well Ray!

I Have been building lasers for over 40 years.

I have femto lasers that produce tera watts and nevre have I made particals with them. I do not no where you got that from but that is just not true.I have worked on projects at LLNL on the fusion project. Show me the math.

[artynz]

Well particles have huge energies even compared to powerful lasers, and much higher frequencies. If you reach a frequency equal to the Compton frequency of an electron I guarantee you will get particles or your money back.

[airc123]

Well getting back to a continuous medium. If you look throught a telloscope or a electron microscope, The medium will not be continuous.

If we take the vacuum of space and call it a space-time medium of Gravity waves. The black holes that rip that field and the stars may be floting in it will not make it continuous.

A EM wave needs no medium to radiate through.

At CERN the are looking for the HIGGS field. The HIGGS may be the medium you are assuming.

But that is not continuous.Nothing!?

[artynz]

The medium (aether) is taken to be continuous for the purposes of calculating how it distorts as waves pass through it or when matter makes standing waves in it. But of course the presence of that matter or those waves makes it APPEAR non-continuous.

(more to come)...

[artynz]

(cont)

The modern idea that "nothing waves" is pretty absurd if you think about it for a little while. But if you want to call the aether "nothing", go right ahead as long as you understand that it waves and is continuous. My suggestion is an alternative to Higgs, 10 or 26 space dimensions and all that other crazy stuff. These people have never made an accurate prediction - after the event is not a prediction. I have made many accurate predictions that standard theory cannot make.

[airc123]

Well the EM filed does not need a medium to pass through. The EM fild fall off with the distance it started from. There are only 4 dimension xyzT to specify a point in space. Wave do not interfere with each other. Only when you apply a probe at a point do you see the sum or diffrence of the waves at that point. What about charge!!? in standing wave theory how does that work?

[artynz]

I give some information about how I think charge works in "part 2" - it is probably phase.

While it is conventional wisdom that e/m waves do not interfere with each other, that is because in most cases the fields are very weak so that the terms x and y are far greater than x*y and the interaction term x*y is negligible. However at high energies such as lasers, there is interaction which in extreme cases can cause particle creation.

Without non-linearity of e/m it could never be observed.

[airc123]

Continuous would mean no particals. Just one lump of stuff1

[artynz]

Sorry, missed this earlier. Yes, one lump of continuous stuff. If we look an entirely new way at the universe as being a solid, then we find that what we previously thought to be solids are just standing waves in the real solid. We inhabit a world of aetherial forms.

[airc123]

String Theory is made of standing waves they are open loop vibrating or closed in a circule loop of standing waves. String theoy is about standing wave energy packets. Each string vibrates at a Harmonic standing wave. That is how it makes QM physics work. The word harmonic implies QM. Harmonic resonance energy weather it be a EM field or some other form are multiples of a standind wave. This is why the electrons can be in only certan orbits. QM works it is the theoy behind the Lasers process

[airc123]

continuation: So how do strings get together to make larger particals?,and what medium are they floting in? Maybe they are not floting at all. We just personify because we kind of flot in the air around us, in every day life and we can not visualise forms of space?

[artynz]

Strings?!? I think you are talking about some other theory :-)

There are no strings in Harmonics Theory. The universe has a continuous medium and particles are standing wave structures in that.

[airc123]

Continuation: What I mean is what is the Planks Lengths enterface that the stringe energy is resonating off of ?? As you no there are millions of radio waves but they do not interfere wiyh each other as they radiate through space. Only at a enterface do the respond to each other!

[airc123]

Continuation: When you have a standing wave there must be a interface between the two mediums that the wave is vibrating off of or in!So What Is it at the Planks length that strings are vibrating at??

Now is that not a whacky thought!!!

from David @ laser physics.

[airc123]

Continuation: It all looks good on paper but I do not think we have a clue!I think at High frequency above Gama rays. The EM energy is vibrating so tight it becomes mass like and maybe,it is the mass we see!I think there are only 4 dimentions xyz and time ! We just are not smart enough to get the correct math to express reality! Human thought waves need to be put into physics and may be a new force to be added to the atomic list!When you have a standing wave there must be a interface between the

[artynz]

Yes, it does become mass like as the Compton frequencies of particles are around 10^20 to 10^23 Hz for electrons and nucleons. That is high gamma frequency.

[airc123]

HI Ray!

OK is this where you want to chat!You no the string theory talks about closed loops!But what is vibrating! Is it a EM wave A GW or some other from of energy! The big Question what makes a vibrating string!!

[NWM11Bravo]

I AGREE TOTALLY!!!!

[artynz]

Thanks.

I suspect that there may be possible new energy sources from this. However I have avoided looking in to that because I think that humans burn too much energy already and we would just totally wreck our environment if we had "free energy".

[EthrFused]

Very sound theory, my fav so far! Excellent work, is it possible to use your theory to create a new energy source? perhaps some sort of frequency we can tap into? I have a theory on geometrics and its role in manipulating thermodynamic events but it can easily apply to harmonics too. Keep it up artynz!

[Saskachewan]

You're right that M&M experiment failed because it can't measure own Doppler effect in its own frame of reference. I've done calculations for that a few time ago, but noone take them seriously ;/

But why you're saying that WSM waves are like E-M waves? They're different, because quantum waves are scalar, and E-M waves are vector. In my opinion, E-M waves are "modulations" over carrier waves, which are quantum scalar waves. So E-M waves are vector transverse waves.

[michaeld009]

i think i will eat some nestle cereal

[artynz]

In my view the aether is a tensile medium that supports transverse waves and leads directly to E-M. There are others who think that WSM waves are scalar. They do find some ways to produce polarisation, so I cannot say that they are definitely wrong.

[artynz]

The magnetic field is the local rate of rotation of the aether while the electric field relates to acceleration. In my view the aether is a totally uniform continuous field without any finer composition. The wave velocity of the medium is the velocity of light. Gravity is the rate at which energy moves to harmonics of the matter waves. See the other parts 2, 3A, 3B.

[spacetimewarp]

The wave structure of matter cannot be disputed today. A totally "solid" particle cannot move, at all. So how are the electric and magnetic fields different from each other? Another question is what is it that composes the ether which supports the waves? What phenomenon of space restricts the velocity of light in a vacuum to the value of c? And how do these matter waves generate the force of gravity? I do not expect an answer to all of these as the answers are not yet known in all cases.

[Saskachewan]

"The WSM cannot be disputed today"

Why?

"how are the E and M fields different from each other?"

They differ by behaviour and interactions, but they're related by Maxwell's equations [especially by the A field, or magnetic vector potential], so they're two faces of the same medal.

"what is it that composes the ether"

Nothing. The space itself.

[Saskachewan]

Continued...

"What phenomenon of space restricts the velocity of light in a vacuum to the value of c?"

Because if the wave center moves, Doopler effect applies, the wave gets compressed and its frequency appears to increase [that's the increase of mass, because frequency is proportional to energy, and energy is proportional to mass, E=mc^2=hf]. It can't move quicker than c from the same reason that sound can't travel quicker than sound ;) [shockwave builds up].

[physics1philosophy]

Hi Ray,

Nice summary of the Wave Structure of Matter.

One thought.

The ancient Greeks also developed metaphysics. And this is founded on the existence of one substance that must cause and connect the many things we experience. They were correct - it is Space (ether).

They just did not realise that it was a wave medium!

Geoff