looks surprisingly good ... but, it probably doesn't have seatbelts, and certainly not pretensioners, inertia reels, or headrests, so everyone's just suffered caved-in foreheads followed by massive whiplash. Also it'd be interesting to see what the state of the footwell and steering column is like after that.
@s650bandit the 2CV was already designed before the war, but hardly any prototypes were not destroyed to prevent them falling into the hands of the germans
Now this is the way front-on crash tests SHOULD ALWAYS happen. Two of the same car, same orientation, same engine, same speed, same everything. Then, a seperate crash test with a bigger car, and a seperate crash test with a smaller one to even things out. :)
you might think if these had setbelts you would be ok you might but if that happens in that car, the steering wheel will crash into you're face, a bit like a KO punch from a professional boxer
I didn't actually believe you at first because the differences are so subtle and my brain/eyes were saying "2CV!" ... but the clue is in the bonnet line. 2CV has a higher bonnet and separate headlights in pods. Dyane is lower and slightly sleeker, and the lights are in the front. It's only visible for a second or two before they collide though.
@TahreyUK. Happy to help, I just stated they're both Dyanes, as two people had said red one was a 2cv.
Dyane, Ami, LNA, & Visa, were launched to replace 2cv, but 2cv continued to out sell all the supposed replacements, until 1991 when they didn't meet minimum safety standards.
Is the rear axles of these old Citroens actually attached to the car? Both the 2CV and the Dyane's axles end up near enough right underneath the body! Wierd, yet strangely "I want one" design! I wanted a Dyane since I was like, 3! lol. Now i'm 17 i'll make do with my VW Polo :P
They dont really have a rear axle. The rear suspension is just a single trailing arm each side. This is attached to the bodywork just in front of the rear wheel. Its similar to the rear suspension of a motorbike.
I own a Dyane 6 and i have refitted it completely: I hope you may enjoy the same experience-they're not easy to find, but they're fun and excellent to drive and maintin
@DSmaster99 It's probably a "stub axle", which is a fairly common thing on front wheel drive cars. Things like the 1980s Fiat Panda were notable for HAVING a full (but "dead") rear axle, so simple/sturdy/cheap was their design.
Stubs are perfectly fine if the vehicle is properly engineered - you don't see the wheels of a Golf GTi folding under when it becomes a tricycle with enthusiastic cornering - but if it's not attached properly it can be deadly...
@oiseautempete that's only ~17mph each?! OK, maybe it's not so brilliant a result in that case...
I'd be interested to see what the 65k (40mph) assymmetric test result is like, having seen a few of those recently - e.g. Fiat 500, Smart, and some Nissan SUV doing very well... Chinese saloons, VW Bus and tinpot Detroit 4x4s turning into highly efficient passenger execution devices...
What you say? the 2cv was built in serial in 1948 and never structural modified and you speak from 65km/h crash test? Be realistic...the 2cv resists at a 55kmH crast test, this is pretty good for a car that age...
@oiseautempete Oh no, don't get me wrong, it's pretty good for something of that era, particularly given it's cheap materials & construction. Seems to absorb the collision alright, at a fair proportion of it's top speed.
But most of the tests that are up on youtube for which this may be compared to are run at much higher speed. This is more like two cyclists colliding, or a particularly vicious coming-together in a parking lot. The resulting amount of damage vs the impact strength is quite high
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
a fairly good car
i owned a rolls royce phantom but unfortunately i crasehd when i was drunk and on acid.
poor unlucky me, a few weeks before i had already crashed my company's car, a mercedes e-class, against a concrete bridge because a business meeting was being cancelled so i had to hang around and got bored.
so i decided to buy an affordable car and switched to citroen 2cv (thew predecessor of this model)
of course, its technique is outdated but it is a car with a very unique appeal
not from steel, that´s why Mercedes is so expensive, and diane will probably wreck a tank lol
no wait, did you realize I was not talking of Smart car or A -Class, I was talking of a Mercedes Benz..., a real one..., if you just know what this means in weight and steel quality...
I hope you are not angry whith me when I think your posting is just a typical random youtube bullshit comment.
Mercedes will swallow most of the hit because its metal is softer than of that Citroen, so Mercedes will be wrecked and Citroen only a bit damaged. I already saw such a test.
am i right in saying although it looks funny when they bounce up, modern cars are designed to bounce up, and although the car crushed at the front the rear windows dint break untill it droped back down to the ground meening the struckture was still sollid back there :)
This is scary, I was driven 110mph (ish) in one of these a few months ago, slip streaming lorries to get extra speed. He left it until the last millisecond before swerving out. Also did 60 round corners, couldn't believe it didn't roll out.
crap crap crap. french cars are crap always have been always will be, ugly soft UNSAFE vehicles... why any1 wud buy such an ugly car is past me. there are a few that look nice i admit but on a whole, not a chance...
and thats coming from someone who drives a rover? what a fag. i hope your mum dosnt see all the shit covered condoms and wet towels on the back seats.
fuck you! you dont know anything about the A series citroens! yes they might look abit intimidating :P i own one! theyre absolutely amazing! not crap at all! these are early Dyane4s by the looks of it! and they arent crap either!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
French cars are works of "art", the may not start most of the time but at least they are good for a laugh when they do.. If you want a real car buy a German made car.
a SHIT CAR, i HAD ONE OF 1981,.....
Hatejews1 2 months ago
Looks like a scene in Cars 2.
Tunerdude94 5 months ago
at least the cars had crumble zones
Acara23 6 months ago
looks surprisingly good ... but, it probably doesn't have seatbelts, and certainly not pretensioners, inertia reels, or headrests, so everyone's just suffered caved-in foreheads followed by massive whiplash. Also it'd be interesting to see what the state of the footwell and steering column is like after that.
TahreyUK 7 months ago
great car
leksandar3 9 months ago
equipped with bounceback
ovidone1 9 months ago
creepy music *.*
BrunostNOR 10 months ago
2 ft air anyone ??
topger77 10 months ago
5 star
tuner1967 11 months ago
@.@ ?
xmadxxx 1 year ago
smooch!!!
mihax209 1 year ago
Niceee car
americanroute66 1 year ago
@americanroute66
WARFFFF
JOKE??
SaabisteALaRetraite 1 year ago
@SaabisteALaRetraite hahaha, is safer than some modern cars in China. And in 1968.
americanroute66 1 year ago
@americanroute66
Does it exist modern car in China ?!!!
The safety is my priority ;there are too many bad drivers !!
SaabisteALaRetraite 1 year ago
@SaabisteALaRetraite hahaha true! Happy holidays!
americanroute66 1 year ago
@americanroute66
TOO FOR YOU
AND
YOUR FAMILY !
SaabisteALaRetraite 1 year ago
let's try it with a real car against a diane! those test were real misleading
215alessio 1 year ago 2
yes. this is hilarious. i have a dyane for my first car, and it's fab. and it comes out quite well, which is goood :D
xxemililyxx 1 year ago
awwwww so cute
Jogonam 1 year ago
Salam
Jalebe! test zhiyan!
aidin594 1 year ago
they couldn't have crashed at 35mph....the drivers would've died from old age before that would've happened...
oldsoulyoungbody 1 year ago 3
this funny
Elizabethkeiraknight 1 year ago
However not bad for frames designed in 1948 (2cv).
s650bandit 1 year ago
@s650bandit the 2CV was already designed before the war, but hardly any prototypes were not destroyed to prevent them falling into the hands of the germans
Vallecrash 1 year ago
@Vallecrash I meant the year of start of production. I know well the history of the 2CV. Thank you.
s650bandit 1 year ago
like a miror
the same shit!
SuperNick134 1 year ago
Piątke sobie przybili oponami :D
fiaciorfl 1 year ago
Now this is the way front-on crash tests SHOULD ALWAYS happen. Two of the same car, same orientation, same engine, same speed, same everything. Then, a seperate crash test with a bigger car, and a seperate crash test with a smaller one to even things out. :)
Ptylersworld 1 year ago
@Ptylersworld Problem is only things like the 2CV are cheap enough for any manufacturer or government testing agency to even be able to consider it!
TahreyUK 7 months ago
you might think if these had setbelts you would be ok you might but if that happens in that car, the steering wheel will crash into you're face, a bit like a KO punch from a professional boxer
toyotaprius79 1 year ago
kjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
oxPYROxo 1 year ago
TWINS!
irvykinneas 1 year ago
damaged the same way^ ^ xD
Ballenylus 1 year ago
Jak na tamte czasy to nie jest tragicznie
MrMichal939 1 year ago
Looks like it crashed into a mirror
integraf40 1 year ago
Duck dance LOL
aloisbembel 1 year ago
LOOOL......absolutely great :'D
Arkadasch123 1 year ago
...yo tenia uno igual en amarillo......joder que pasada
moonchild883n 1 year ago
simply symetric :)
tincho92 1 year ago
Not bad for 60's cheap car! : )
Sitikkamies93 1 year ago 3
hahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahah
HokutoNoSandwich 1 year ago
Two people have said the red car is a 2 CV
They're both Dyanes
Hondaboy27160478 1 year ago 3
@Hondaboy27160478
I didn't actually believe you at first because the differences are so subtle and my brain/eyes were saying "2CV!" ... but the clue is in the bonnet line. 2CV has a higher bonnet and separate headlights in pods. Dyane is lower and slightly sleeker, and the lights are in the front. It's only visible for a second or two before they collide though.
TahreyUK 7 months ago
@TahreyUK. Happy to help, I just stated they're both Dyanes, as two people had said red one was a 2cv.
Dyane, Ami, LNA, & Visa, were launched to replace 2cv, but 2cv continued to out sell all the supposed replacements, until 1991 when they didn't meet minimum safety standards.
Hondaboy27160478 6 months ago
Is the rear axles of these old Citroens actually attached to the car? Both the 2CV and the Dyane's axles end up near enough right underneath the body! Wierd, yet strangely "I want one" design! I wanted a Dyane since I was like, 3! lol. Now i'm 17 i'll make do with my VW Polo :P
DSmaster99 2 years ago
@DSmaster99
They dont really have a rear axle. The rear suspension is just a single trailing arm each side. This is attached to the bodywork just in front of the rear wheel. Its similar to the rear suspension of a motorbike.
sparkygl0s 2 years ago
@sparkygl0s
Ahh, I understand, thanks for the explanation! Cheers buddy (Y)
DSmaster99 2 years ago
I own a Dyane 6 and i have refitted it completely: I hope you may enjoy the same experience-they're not easy to find, but they're fun and excellent to drive and maintin
mimiayuara 1 year ago 2
Yeah, would love to drive one, one day. Very classic. But they seem to be built out of Kitchen Foil! Haha ,, love Dyane's though
DSmaster99 1 year ago
well... yes, excellent driving experience, but we have to talk about metal shit, not metal sheet, truly. The body is made in rusty tinfoil.
mimiayuara 1 year ago
@DSmaster99 It's probably a "stub axle", which is a fairly common thing on front wheel drive cars. Things like the 1980s Fiat Panda were notable for HAVING a full (but "dead") rear axle, so simple/sturdy/cheap was their design.
Stubs are perfectly fine if the vehicle is properly engineered - you don't see the wheels of a Golf GTi folding under when it becomes a tricycle with enthusiastic cornering - but if it's not attached properly it can be deadly...
TahreyUK 7 months ago
i know! the rear wheels are practically floating around on their own! o_O
snowball1988 1 year ago
Absolutely mad, aint it snowball?!
DSmaster99 1 year ago
LOL!
an3torres 2 years ago 3
Red 2 CV won!!!!
The blue one rebounded backward while the red one remained in position!
cacaaleau 2 years ago 7
@cacaaleau neither are 2cv's, they are both Dyanes
SquareoftheyearFM 1 year ago
Springy!
ammca66564 2 years ago
Compact car ?
Alexvideoclip 2 years ago 2
this car rock :D fun to drive extreme motor power :P and the stearing is fun and its not even safe to crash i 10 km/p^^
kufenaut123 2 years ago
lol, duck jumping
toddi1971 2 years ago 3
At what speed they crashed? I guess at 10 miles per hour or something like that.
kanonekraftschuss 2 years ago 57
No, 10 kpm, which equates to a little over 6 mph.
mastashaker916 2 years ago
Something like 30 mph, i think.
swordfish1986 1 year ago
@kanonekraftschuss
the car was homologated at 55km/h crash test...(34 mph)
oiseautempete 8 months ago
@oiseautempete Is that both cars doing 55km/h each, or that each one contributes 27.5km/h to the total?
TahreyUK 7 months ago
@TahreyUK
In this test each car run at 27.5km/h, but the official UTAC test was 55km/h in a beton wall (not deformable).
Actualy the test is at 65km/h in a assymetric (only the half wide of the car) deformable obstacle (simulation of frontal collision in another car)
oiseautempete 7 months ago
@oiseautempete that's only ~17mph each?! OK, maybe it's not so brilliant a result in that case...
I'd be interested to see what the 65k (40mph) assymmetric test result is like, having seen a few of those recently - e.g. Fiat 500, Smart, and some Nissan SUV doing very well... Chinese saloons, VW Bus and tinpot Detroit 4x4s turning into highly efficient passenger execution devices...
TahreyUK 7 months ago
@TahreyUK
What you say? the 2cv was built in serial in 1948 and never structural modified and you speak from 65km/h crash test? Be realistic...the 2cv resists at a 55kmH crast test, this is pretty good for a car that age...
oiseautempete 7 months ago
@oiseautempete Oh no, don't get me wrong, it's pretty good for something of that era, particularly given it's cheap materials & construction. Seems to absorb the collision alright, at a fair proportion of it's top speed.
But most of the tests that are up on youtube for which this may be compared to are run at much higher speed. This is more like two cyclists colliding, or a particularly vicious coming-together in a parking lot. The resulting amount of damage vs the impact strength is quite high
TahreyUK 6 months ago
@kanonekraftschuss
This car was tested and UTAC 1968 test approved at 35mph (55km/h)
oiseautempete 8 months ago
xD
good crash :D
czesiosmok 2 years ago
What a high passion kiss!!!
beerdeddi 2 years ago 21
Looks like Esther Williams water ballet or whatever you call it, syncronised swimming.
Loretta2004 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
a fairly good car
i owned a rolls royce phantom but unfortunately i crasehd when i was drunk and on acid.
poor unlucky me, a few weeks before i had already crashed my company's car, a mercedes e-class, against a concrete bridge because a business meeting was being cancelled so i had to hang around and got bored.
so i decided to buy an affordable car and switched to citroen 2cv (thew predecessor of this model)
of course, its technique is outdated but it is a car with a very unique appeal
SatansFatUdder 2 years ago
pure simetri :)
niioniio 3 years ago
FU<K Mercedes Benz!!
Citroën for the win!
Xantialos2 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cv2 sucks.trabant ftw
t0xictreasure 3 years ago
I see. Mercedes is probably build from copper
not from steel, that´s why Mercedes is so expensive, and diane will probably wreck a tank lol
no wait, did you realize I was not talking of Smart car or A -Class, I was talking of a Mercedes Benz..., a real one..., if you just know what this means in weight and steel quality...
I hope you are not angry whith me when I think your posting is just a typical random youtube bullshit comment.
truthspeaker2000 3 years ago
@truthspeaker2000
1. who were you talking to?
2. copper? really? ... I mean REALLY?
TahreyUK 7 months ago
sincronizados..jaja
tioyis 3 years ago
funny how they fly back after crashing :D
QuickT538 3 years ago 3
let´s crash one of them with a mercedes benz
and then have a look what they look like
after this... :)
truthspeaker2000 3 years ago 3
Mercedes will swallow most of the hit because its metal is softer than of that Citroen, so Mercedes will be wrecked and Citroen only a bit damaged. I already saw such a test.
SEThatered 3 years ago
yeah
after the crash between mercedes and citron (-;
The driver of citroen has a chance after
the crash to be driven by the same mercedes from crash to the cimetery (-; !!!
edis23 2 years ago
they sould crash a dyane and a renault megane hahahaha
Punto9090 3 years ago
mi ez a zene ?
Predember 3 years ago
woow the do better then a tought.
moradwan 3 years ago
car for noobs
Chickenlool 3 years ago
A bump, a bounce and some nice music, all with perfect symmetry. Crashing is fun in a Citroen Dyane!
Futurebobbers 3 years ago 4
Let's make a commerical like that! :D
TehRunar 3 years ago 2
am i right in saying although it looks funny when they bounce up, modern cars are designed to bounce up, and although the car crushed at the front the rear windows dint break untill it droped back down to the ground meening the struckture was still sollid back there :)
willissofunny 3 years ago
aia
dra587 3 years ago
what is the speed of each vehicle?
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
hihi funny, They jump ^_^
timoulete76 3 years ago
i am just wondering, why do the bother? no one will ever buy that car again.
bullet50000 3 years ago
it's fun ^^
coogiez 3 years ago
true, true.
bullet50000 3 years ago
LOL.
This is scary, I was driven 110mph (ish) in one of these a few months ago, slip streaming lorries to get extra speed. He left it until the last millisecond before swerving out. Also did 60 round corners, couldn't believe it didn't roll out.
deathwishdorris 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
crap crap crap. french cars are crap always have been always will be, ugly soft UNSAFE vehicles... why any1 wud buy such an ugly car is past me. there are a few that look nice i admit but on a whole, not a chance...
checkerz18 4 years ago
Could you define "Unsafe" for me please when Renault have one of the best Euro NCAP ratings??
bratattack5 4 years ago 6
and thats coming from someone who drives a rover? what a fag. i hope your mum dosnt see all the shit covered condoms and wet towels on the back seats.
evan6969 3 years ago 5
fuck you! you dont know anything about the A series citroens! yes they might look abit intimidating :P i own one! theyre absolutely amazing! not crap at all! these are early Dyane4s by the looks of it! and they arent crap either!
hmm so what car do you have then?
JoMo91 3 years ago 4
boing!!
canonpowershotseries 4 years ago 78
This comment has received too many negative votes show
French cars are works of "art", the may not start most of the time but at least they are good for a laugh when they do.. If you want a real car buy a German made car.
dawnrun911 4 years ago
Did you see the rear pop open and bench eject? Chrysler minivanesque!
HighestRank 4 years ago
i laugh at the way they both jump up in excatly the same way.....XD
madmax678 4 years ago 2
Lol the drivelines snap and they bounce after the impact
cheese2507 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tuuuuuuuuuuuuuftttttrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrdddddddddddddryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
chayotero27 4 years ago
boing!!
nesmaddan 4 years ago 7
ha ha ha ha!!!
dannystanley 4 years ago
Amazing how the cabin "keeps alive" on such a plastic-and-cardboard car.
All passengers not fastened might jump out the sun roof canvas though...
Griffencph 4 years ago 3
Comment removed
swordfish1986 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey friends,
bang some local babes near you!.. i-fling * com (remove the * replace with . )
X72687895
platano4 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
O.M.G !!! OHH MY GOD !!!
ravivhaik 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WHAT YOU WOULD OF BEEN SAFE U NOOB
jolster999 4 years ago