it should not be called anti gravity for it still have weight in it while acting as a blade-less propellant within the atmospheric environment, in theory a device with super strong Repulsive Magnetic properties enough to counter react with the earth's geomagnetic properties is still subjected to Gravity, a so called anti gravity device is thought to neutralize it's bulk weight at the molecular level.
Not really anti gravity because there's barely any magnetism involved in here, the voltage is just sucking the air down so it appears to be floating.
Reversing the gravity pull would actually mean that the cealing would be the floor and the floor would be the cealing, but this device is just floating some feet in the air and not actually "falling" to the cealing.
Please find the NASA test series done in a vacuum chamber..... Remember- less than 80 years ago it was stated and believed cars would never exceed 25 mph. The "experts" , both medical and engineers said the human body could not withstand the g forces of a 25mph turn ! Open your minds! The first patents for gravity manipulation, thrust and inertia dampening were filed in 1952. Tech HAS to work in order to receive a patent. Check for yourself. Cheers.
@KryderExploration OH MY GOD DUDE, you are so full of it. It is proven to not work in a vacuum. If it did you could go to Sharper image, buy an Ionic Breeze machine and fly to jupiter. You are so full of it. Post your video of the vacuum chamber you built and show us. Seriously.
@shredderofmass Please find the NASA test series done in a vacuum chamber..... Remember- less than 80 years ago it was stated and believed cars would never exceed 25 mph. The "experts" , both medical and engineers said the human body could not withstand the g forces of a 25mph turn ! Open your minds! The first patents for gravity manipulation, thrust and inertia dampening were filed in 1952. Tech HAS to work in order to receive a patent. Check for yourself. Cheers.
it does not require any "air" to work. It is making something called ion wind. But it has nothing to do with 'air" wind. its just a name to quantify and relate the EFFECT. There is NO wind ! It is a field with "flow". This flow either inhibits or allows currents to pass through itself and draws it into a vortex around the ions in the primary field. Resulting in a secondary field kernel in which the primary field is now encapsulated, negating any outside effect, including gravity!.
IT DOES NOT WORK BY MOVING AIR. IN FACT, IT WONT MOVE AIR AT ALL (OR WE WOULD HAVE LOW DRAW FANS WITH NO BLADES.)
A 3LB ROLL OF COPPER WIRE WILL LIFT OFF THE TABLE AT 110V @ 3 A ! AND DO SO WITHOUT BLOWING ANYTHING AROUND. dO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH WIND IT TAKES TO LIFT A 3 LB ROLL OF WIRE ??? iT WOULD CLEAR THE ROOM BEFORE THE WIRE MOVED AT ALL !!!
IT DOES WORK IN A VACUUM. NAYSAYERS. BUT THEN YOU NEVER TRIED DID YOU?
Lifters such as this one are extremely common and absolutely nothing new. You can even find design competition for it on internet. It is so lame to try to make it look like a new technology.....
By the way Timmy here did not invent this... It has been around since before he was born. And we have knowen since before he was born that it is ion wind causing it to fly and not antigravity. If you like I have NASA documents to back this up. I would be more then happy to send you a copy all you have to do is ask.
Actually that's not reversing the pull of gravity. According to an episode of Mythbusters, it is creating lift from the high voltage being forced through the super tiny wires on the device, which makes it float, creating the ILLUSION of gravity reversal. There is really no way to reverse gravity's pull on us, unless we completely stop the earth's rotation, which would be irresponsible and stupid, because the atmosphere would no longer exist, and we would die
What happens is that the air gets ionized, and the corona wire pulls the iniozed air molecules downwards, creating a small, but big enough air flow, to counter the weight of the lifter.
Stick this thing in a vacuum, and it will do nothing.
What happens is that the air gets ionized, and the corona wire pulls the iniozed air molecules downwards, creating a small, but big enough air flow, to counter the weight of the lifter.
Stick this thing in a vacuum, and it will do nothing.
This guy didn't invent that. It was invented back in the 40s or 50s and classified by the military. The man that did invent this patented the air ionizers that are sold in stores today.
If these floaters were 'anti gravity' then they would
a) only get a force in the opposite diretion of gravity, which they don't.
b) would not have such a limited height of their thrust. The effect of gravity doesn't just drop off about a foot above the ground! so it would shoot up to the ceiling instantly.
c) would work in a vacuum (the supposed evidence for this remains to be seen, show me the paper!)
d) would not conform so well to the maths known forces and effects.
I wish I had more space to explain gravity, as it's theorized by Einstein. With only 500 characters to type, it is impossible to go into any kind of detail on this theory. It is the most logical theory yet presented. It's not some mysterious force shared by two objects that someday we will be able to overcome. It IS the bending of the space-time fabric by a mass. It has been tested and proven to be a very accurate theory. Search youtube on Einstein's theory of gravity. It's incredible.
@LMAO0O0O0 I think in due time we'll find out, but for now only a small model can show us. I think eventually we'd be able to make a spaceship of some sort, along the lines of the same science here. For now tho, ply wood is cool
@LMAO0O0O0 You miss the point. It's not anti-gravity, which they claim. It's only an electron thrust engine. It relies on air flow to make it work. It does not work in a vacuum. Mythbusters proved it.
@Scottcmilk To reverse gravity, you'd have to warp space in an opposite direction and in a greater field than the gravity well it is in.
Think of gravity as a spandex sheet. Objects placed on that sheet dents the sheet around the objects. The more massive the object the deeper the dent. That is gravity, pretty much. You'd have to un-dent the sheet to float, and make it dent in the opposite direction to raise up.
This is Einstein's theory on gravity, not yet disproven.
Anti gravity? No. Not even close. Its a fun little science experiment, nothing more. The high voltage power going through the fine wire around the top of the device ionizes the air around it, and the tinfoil attracts the ionized air to it, creating a downdraft. The device is light enough to allow it to be blown upwards by this draft. Simple enough to make, though I wont tell anyone how to do it, I dont want to be responsible for someone electrocuting themselves.
I think when real gravity manipulation comes there won't be any doubt about it. I want to see a true antigravity device that can generate energy from nothing, seemingly nothing, like a perpetual motion machine, cranking out more energy than put in, that would be something.
Its called ION Wind. It is not antigravity. The voltage between the wire and the foil draws air down. It requires a lot of electricity and must be vanishingly light compared to its energy source. No mystery. No magic. And no hope of a UFO from this plain jane, perfectly terrestrial technology.
He says "No one knows for sure" , actually we do. It has been proven to NOT work in a vacuum. So it is absolutely not anti gravity. It would never work outside an atmosphere. It is absolutely proven to be ion wind. Look up 'ion engines' on how things work and you can see that in a way the technology is already being used in space. An Ion engine brings its own gas (argon perhaps) along in a tank.
@shredderofmass It's a demonstration that it can be done...it's obviously not the exact form of anti-gravity as we think of in flying saucers,its a smaller version...it demonstrates what can be done. An ion is an atom or molecule where the total number of electrons is not equal to the total number of protons, giving it a net positive or negative electrical charge. An ion thruster is a form of electric propulsion used for spacecraft propulsion that creates thrust by accelerating ions.
@UnderManiac the common bond they all share are the "steps to anti-gravity" Understanding how to overcome gravity in different forms. The ion induced device utilizes air flow yes. The whole point is gravity is manipulated with no moving parts. No it isnt a warp drive machine but space IS manipulated and gravity overcome.
@LMAO0O0O0 Ah, but space is not manipulated. Space around the object stays the same. The claim is that the foil device is anti-gravity. It is not. Not as far as birds, airplanes, and balloons utilize anti-gravity techniques. Gravity is overcome, yes, but we hop and gravity is overcome for an instant.
They are holding to the false belief that their device IS anti-gravity. I'd concede if they would admit it's only a device to overcome gravity, in a different way. An electron thruster.
@LMAO0O0O0 Flying saucers? I've never seen one of these, nor has anyone else. If there were such things, they'd be suspended by other means than "anti-gravity". What most people don't understand, and some refuse to understand, is that gravity is not a force. Einstein even said so. I don't know how many times I explain gravity but you don't want to listen. You'd have to unbend space-time to achieve "anti-gravity".
which is wat saucers do...don't be one of those people who say the earth is flat before you literaly see it's round. Your smarter than that...that i can see.
@LMAO0O0O0 And, since you're so learned on the way flying saucers operate, tell me how do they manipulate space-time in order to achieve "anti-gravity".
Personally, I don't believe that flying saucers have ever visited earth. There'd be no reason for them to do so. Especially within the last 50 years or so. Astronomers would certainly have seen them, since they're always looking at the night sky. No alien craft would be able to elude the myriad of telescopes that are trained on the night sky
Research...The Disclosure Project..A ton of answers for you. Your smart enough to know Enstien was correct reguarding bending space time...so there must be a way to do it. If Einstein knew the answer on how to acheieve anti-gravity and you back that theory up...why shoot down the possibility?
@shredderofmass Your right this is terrestrial made...and thats the point. We humans are on that step and anti-gravity can be made once u know the formula. You say this isn't magic...but yet it is magical. you label it with words and deny it defies gravity, when right in front of your eyes it does just that. You know the formula and think that knowing makes this nothing special....when right in front of your eyes it is floating. Silently it hovers with no visable means of propulsion.
@shredderofmass News Flash!! It is not "ion wind" smoke tests have been done to prove that. mgcox is wrong also, it works even better in a vacuum since since the absence of oxygen reduces arcing which makes this "lifter" drop like a brick. The biggest drawback is it cannot lift itself and it's power supply. So it is only useful in a weightless environment. I have built one myself (really easy) no moving parts and it jumps up in a snap. note it must be tethered or it becomes a human bug zapper.
@72chevelle156 So it is anti -gravity that only works in a weightless environment? Thats a scream. Have you ever tried it in a vacuum? Yes, sorry, it is ion wind. Vacuum tests of these devices have been done, they sit there like a limp of stuff, no motion whatsoever.
@shredderofmass I don't think I use the term anti-gravity. Let me come at this a little different. Successful vacuum tests are horizontal. This has made me curious though you seem to be familiar with ion wind I was wondering if ion wind could make something move as fast as the lifter jumps when activated? I think I am going to make another one what the hay its fun.
Its been shown to NOT work in a vacuum. If you can do that you'll win the nobel. And yes Ion wind could cause it to jump. The proof is by removing the air (vacuum) . They have never worked in a vacuum. You can try this yourself. Like I said, get it to work in a vacuum and you win the nobel prize. Prove me wrong, I would truly like it.
@KryderExploration Again, you are completely and totally wrong. You say this with such strong caps but you have not tried it yourself . It has been done, it has been proven wrong. It is Ion wind, it does move the are, and it does not work in a vacuum. There are videos of them being tested in a vacuum and failing, which they have to because it is ion wind. Also there are smoke tests showing wind. Wishful thinking on your part.
This is fun. It reminds me of the experiments NASA did with 'flying capacitors'. Something like if you have a spinning particle in a gravity field it will produce it's own field according to its spin.
i think it levitates because there is a magnetic field in the top wire strong enough to attract the frame and since the frame can't get to the wire it pulls itself up and of the ground
I love how reporters confuse elementary terms, like measuring power in terms of volts. I think electronics should be a required course today, on par with English or Psychology. I mean, it's all around us. Check out Electrodynamic tether in wikipedia. It explains some of the recent electromagnetic thrust technology that NASA has been experimenting with in space.
If you look outside of the device, nearby in the room, you can see the electrostatic field generators (old tech) that are anchored to the floor and are not part of the levitating, aluminum/balsa device. This means the device is hopelessly dependent up the fixed, earth-borne electrostatic generators. Getting those to fly too is what one requires to have a truly flying device. And no one has shown incontrovertible evidence of having done that yet. In fact, when you think about it, it's needed.
Its NOT an electromagnetic field. It is electrostatic, so it produces a weak magnetic-field at best. A magnetic field reqires current-flow, but the Biefeld-Brown effet does not, jsut a decent enough potential to produce primary-ionisation.
Mythbusters botched the experiment, and are mistaken. Mythbusters also botched the Bedini motor, which many have replicated and have charging batteries as we speak. Mythbusters are corporate kiss-butts. The effect is 100-million times more powerful thrust than ion-wind, and works more efficiently in a vacuum.
i cant say one way or the other since i havent researched this myself.. but your definitely right and theres a few things i've seen on mythbusters that i dont agree with at all... i definitely know when they did the one on the moon landing that if they found it to be faked theres no way they'd be allowed to show it..
and i hate that someone gave me a thumbs down when i was just stating what was on mythbusters...
It is just one of many formerly CLASSIFIED electronic space drives, which are OVER-UNITY. The OIL companies would rather you not know about free energy devices and systems, their insane profits would plummet, and with that would also plummet sooty air-pollution and global warming.
definitely right about that one.. theres supposedly a device that puts out more energy than it takes to power which if true, defiyes the known laws of physics
Gravity is if the effect observed between two entities when the illusion of space apparently shrinks as the universe's entangled virtual plus and minus particles become more entangled due to precession eventually resolving back to zero, the more two entities are entangled the more similar they are and closer they appear to be. Gravity is not a force but a relative observational effect as is time and space, distance and speed. An entity affects another entity to the degree it is in tune and phase
It has been put in vacuum from 1930s to 2008 (TT Brown, HONDA R & D) Takaaki Musha-2007 AIAA, and it is seen that without the loses of corona in air, they work more efficiently for less-current in vaccum, and it has also been shown with anemometers (wind-speedometers) and simple algebra that the force is orders of magnitude greater than what Ion-wind can account for (there is a physical limit to ion-thrust). Thomas Townsend Brown called it ELECTROGRAVITY (artificial gravity).
I have to ask, Does this sort of technology offer any sort of applicable tasks other than gawking at a small aluminum foil model in your backyard or garage, I mean... Does it have forward thrust, not just the ability to hover in place, and does the hover height depend on the amount of current going through the wires?
If possible could we build a massive one with an internal generator and the ability to carry at least 1 human and some cargo? If it's possible are there any other apps for it?
I replicated the forward-thrust TT Brown saucer patent in 1990. The three-foot diameter saucers flew BACKWARDS, covered in plastic, in Reno, Nevada in the year 2000.
The Germans built manned and unmanned such craft starting in the 1930s and 1940s, sponsored by the VRIL and THULE German Alternative Energy societies. The German Rocket Society, heded by Hermann Oberth, and had a young Werner von Braun as a member, gave us ballistic missiles, and manned and unmanned space. With electrogravitics. the universe is open to humans from Sol III (Earth).
In this special he talks of how the germans made an anti gravity craft but during WW2 the united states found it and disessembled it and brought it back to the states. When they reessembled it, it didn't work
Disinformation. It worked. And may other systems as well. Many methods and systems of artificial gravity and gravity control. MOST of the UFOS seen and filmed are military. SOME are alien. That's the whole point!
This reverses NO gravity at all. It uses the same force that a helicopter does. Prove it?
Well like they even said in the video the electricity ionizes air around it and pushes it downward. Once there is enough air being pushed down the contraption rises. same thing happens with a helicopter when the blades rotating force the air down.
Enough lift to balance out the force of gravity and u go liftoff, but not anti gravity.
it only defeats gravity if you throw it up and it never comes back down, thats anti gravity. what that video is demonstrating is thrust, if you disconnect the electricity it falls or if you put it in a vacuum, nothing happens.
A helicopter or any wing traveling in air is sucked into the air by the partial-pressure created on the wing-upper surface; a helicopter is "sucked" into the air, and I have flown helis for nearly 24-years, and I can show you the formulae why this is so. Anemometer tests with the devices and the mesurement in dynes of the thrust generated, and operation in vacuum and under oil for 80-years have shon this to be an efficient DIPOLE space drive, that has no inertia, and should go almost c.
this is as much antigravity as you are experiencing while you jump. just a force temporarily working in the opposite direction of gravity. but not antigravity.
It would appear that we have finally seen the first stages of antigravity. I always related UFO's that people have seen to a magnetic field I would imagine that this is publicly the first sign of antigravity. However if you have seen a UFO you seen an array of lights this would be from the magnetic field conflicting with the atmosphere. Perhaps it is only a matter of time before governments admit to the tech they have had for many years. I doubt it though eventually it will be obvious though.
The UFO's People have been seeing appears to be antigravity tech from Governments the strange coloring in the sky is most likely from the electromagnetic field conflicting with the atmosphere. I would think it is only a matter of time before it comes out.
This is anti gravity the gov has had it for years People have been reporting these for years it is a matter of time before the world knows what they have been seeing. It works using a magnetic field that is why people report when seeing ufo's strange colored lights that is the magnetic field interacting with the atmosphere I have been waiting to see this it was surprising and it should be a matter of time until it is finally revealed about what a UFO is and how it is made. THis
Hip hip zakstop! I concur. However, SOMEBODY has really come up with it and my personal hero Nick Cook in this video needs to check her and him out ASAP before they dissapear into self-inflicted American Amnesia. Her name is Dr. Ning Li of UA d-o-t EDU and Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov of BAESYSTEMS d-o-t COM. Real BONA-FIDE anti-gravity not this ion wind foolishness.
BTW bigkillerjellibean94 its IONS not IRONS. B-I-G DIFFERENCE in mass!
it has nothing to do with gravity. your increasing the desinty of irons in the air, wich are draged down thru the gaps of the shape of the ship, which us triangular. and there for giving thrust. if you have it in any other shape, it will fail, if you put it in an air vacum, it will fail for there is no iron in the air for it to increase the desinity by! ^.^ hoped i helped
Who has decided gravity is a magnetic force? There is no known graviton to fit with the electron needed for electromagnetics. Nobody really understands what gravity is which is why nobody really has come up with anything close to an anti-gravity device.
it should not be called anti gravity for it still have weight in it while acting as a blade-less propellant within the atmospheric environment, in theory a device with super strong Repulsive Magnetic properties enough to counter react with the earth's geomagnetic properties is still subjected to Gravity, a so called anti gravity device is thought to neutralize it's bulk weight at the molecular level.
worldwildwest 10 months ago
Not really anti gravity because there's barely any magnetism involved in here, the voltage is just sucking the air down so it appears to be floating.
Reversing the gravity pull would actually mean that the cealing would be the floor and the floor would be the cealing, but this device is just floating some feet in the air and not actually "falling" to the cealing.
blizard0717 1 year ago
Search: "Gravitec testing at NASA LEEIF facility of asymmetric capacitor in vacuum"
KryderExploration 1 year ago
Please find the NASA test series done in a vacuum chamber..... Remember- less than 80 years ago it was stated and believed cars would never exceed 25 mph. The "experts" , both medical and engineers said the human body could not withstand the g forces of a 25mph turn ! Open your minds! The first patents for gravity manipulation, thrust and inertia dampening were filed in 1952. Tech HAS to work in order to receive a patent. Check for yourself. Cheers.
KryderExploration 1 year ago
yes we have tried this. it requires no atmosphere!
KryderExploration 1 year ago
@KryderExploration OH MY GOD DUDE, you are so full of it. It is proven to not work in a vacuum. If it did you could go to Sharper image, buy an Ionic Breeze machine and fly to jupiter. You are so full of it. Post your video of the vacuum chamber you built and show us. Seriously.
shredderofmass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shredderofmass Please find the NASA test series done in a vacuum chamber..... Remember- less than 80 years ago it was stated and believed cars would never exceed 25 mph. The "experts" , both medical and engineers said the human body could not withstand the g forces of a 25mph turn ! Open your minds! The first patents for gravity manipulation, thrust and inertia dampening were filed in 1952. Tech HAS to work in order to receive a patent. Check for yourself. Cheers.
KryderExploration 1 year ago
it does not require any "air" to work. It is making something called ion wind. But it has nothing to do with 'air" wind. its just a name to quantify and relate the EFFECT. There is NO wind ! It is a field with "flow". This flow either inhibits or allows currents to pass through itself and draws it into a vortex around the ions in the primary field. Resulting in a secondary field kernel in which the primary field is now encapsulated, negating any outside effect, including gravity!.
KryderExploration 1 year ago
IT DOES NOT WORK BY MOVING AIR. IN FACT, IT WONT MOVE AIR AT ALL (OR WE WOULD HAVE LOW DRAW FANS WITH NO BLADES.)
A 3LB ROLL OF COPPER WIRE WILL LIFT OFF THE TABLE AT 110V @ 3 A ! AND DO SO WITHOUT BLOWING ANYTHING AROUND. dO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH WIND IT TAKES TO LIFT A 3 LB ROLL OF WIRE ??? iT WOULD CLEAR THE ROOM BEFORE THE WIRE MOVED AT ALL !!!
IT DOES WORK IN A VACUUM. NAYSAYERS. BUT THEN YOU NEVER TRIED DID YOU?
KryderExploration 1 year ago
problem with this is the power source , this is the key to anti gravity.
diveplane 1 year ago
this won't work in a vacuum
DeaderNBetter 1 year ago
Lifters such as this one are extremely common and absolutely nothing new. You can even find design competition for it on internet. It is so lame to try to make it look like a new technology.....
DeusVivus 1 year ago
it's not "reversing" gravity.
it's countering the effects of gravity with thrust.
this show is being willfully ignorant in saying "nobody knows for sure".
=P
GodlessHippie 1 year ago
This only works in an atmosphere, it needs air to work
beakfast 1 year ago
Haha, he said aloominium!
cvela20032003 1 year ago
By the way Timmy here did not invent this... It has been around since before he was born. And we have knowen since before he was born that it is ion wind causing it to fly and not antigravity. If you like I have NASA documents to back this up. I would be more then happy to send you a copy all you have to do is ask.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
Ion wind... dummys.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
Would this work in a vacuum?
Pulsar205 1 year ago
Actually that's not reversing the pull of gravity. According to an episode of Mythbusters, it is creating lift from the high voltage being forced through the super tiny wires on the device, which makes it float, creating the ILLUSION of gravity reversal. There is really no way to reverse gravity's pull on us, unless we completely stop the earth's rotation, which would be irresponsible and stupid, because the atmosphere would no longer exist, and we would die
disciplerawks 1 year ago
What happens is that the air gets ionized, and the corona wire pulls the iniozed air molecules downwards, creating a small, but big enough air flow, to counter the weight of the lifter.
Stick this thing in a vacuum, and it will do nothing.
This has nothing to do with anti-gravity.
starport2010 1 year ago
What happens is that the air gets ionized, and the corona wire pulls the iniozed air molecules downwards, creating a small, but big enough air flow, to counter the weight of the lifter.
Stick this thing in a vacuum, and it will do nothing.
This has nothing to do with anti-gravity.
starport2010 1 year ago
IT IS ION WIND AND SMOKE TESTS DO PROVE THIS. IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT WORK IN A VACUUM. Stop lying.
miukotse 1 year ago
@72chevelle156 Please tell me that you are joking. It
miukotse 1 year ago
I thought gravity was the push of space, rather than the pull of the earth?
rocknhdsocal 1 year ago
This guy didn't invent that. It was invented back in the 40s or 50s and classified by the military. The man that did invent this patented the air ionizers that are sold in stores today.
evelmassa 1 year ago
If these floaters were 'anti gravity' then they would
a) only get a force in the opposite diretion of gravity, which they don't.
b) would not have such a limited height of their thrust. The effect of gravity doesn't just drop off about a foot above the ground! so it would shoot up to the ceiling instantly.
c) would work in a vacuum (the supposed evidence for this remains to be seen, show me the paper!)
d) would not conform so well to the maths known forces and effects.
Anti gravity indeed!
seansalvador1 1 year ago
so how would you provide 50000 volts in midair with no tethers?
what a loser. he did so not reverse the pull of gravity.
wowonice1 1 year ago
yeah myth busters did crack this one
bogdan1231 1 year ago
@bogdan1231 myth busters is bull shit
lane83180 1 year ago
J. L. Naudin. Google it.
wrb1957 1 year ago
Didnt myth busters crack this?
mikehall2221 1 year ago
but even einstein can err
MrOctaBass 1 year ago
Another video with great visualization: watch?v=AAqSCuHA0j8&feature=quicklist
UnderManiac 2 years ago
Check this out in regards to gravity: watch?v=LHPqhTY6dh0
UnderManiac 2 years ago
I wish I had more space to explain gravity, as it's theorized by Einstein. With only 500 characters to type, it is impossible to go into any kind of detail on this theory. It is the most logical theory yet presented. It's not some mysterious force shared by two objects that someday we will be able to overcome. It IS the bending of the space-time fabric by a mass. It has been tested and proven to be a very accurate theory. Search youtube on Einstein's theory of gravity. It's incredible.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
So, if this is a step toward the stars and the item lifts using Air molecules how does it maneuver once out of the atmosphere?
Magcomplex 2 years ago 2
@Magcomplex This is a small scale demo not a spaceship. It shows on a small scale what can be done.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@LMAO0O0O0 I think in due time we'll find out, but for now only a small model can show us. I think eventually we'd be able to make a spaceship of some sort, along the lines of the same science here. For now tho, ply wood is cool
Yessssssssss 2 years ago
@Yessssssssss the technology exsists...it just isnt at ur local home depot. check out the discloser project.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@LMAO0O0O0 You miss the point. It's not anti-gravity, which they claim. It's only an electron thrust engine. It relies on air flow to make it work. It does not work in a vacuum. Mythbusters proved it.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
wooooooooooo u rock....
killerhobo97 2 years ago
lol, as stupid as the SEARL .
sxdemon 2 years ago
would i be wrong saying that if you reverse gravity thing would keep going up? coz normal gravity keeps things down :o
Scottcmilk 2 years ago
@Scottcmilk To reverse gravity, you'd have to warp space in an opposite direction and in a greater field than the gravity well it is in.
Think of gravity as a spandex sheet. Objects placed on that sheet dents the sheet around the objects. The more massive the object the deeper the dent. That is gravity, pretty much. You'd have to un-dent the sheet to float, and make it dent in the opposite direction to raise up.
This is Einstein's theory on gravity, not yet disproven.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
Anti gravity? No. Not even close. Its a fun little science experiment, nothing more. The high voltage power going through the fine wire around the top of the device ionizes the air around it, and the tinfoil attracts the ionized air to it, creating a downdraft. The device is light enough to allow it to be blown upwards by this draft. Simple enough to make, though I wont tell anyone how to do it, I dont want to be responsible for someone electrocuting themselves.
1980MattZ 2 years ago 3
@1980MattZ Well said. I've researched this technology and you have it on the nose.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
very true. this same concept was shown on mythbusters during their antigravity episode.
defacedlawngnome 2 years ago
I think when real gravity manipulation comes there won't be any doubt about it. I want to see a true antigravity device that can generate energy from nothing, seemingly nothing, like a perpetual motion machine, cranking out more energy than put in, that would be something.
Jammieg001 2 years ago
its cool how british people say alaminion foil
nethdaniel552 2 years ago
Its called ION Wind. It is not antigravity. The voltage between the wire and the foil draws air down. It requires a lot of electricity and must be vanishingly light compared to its energy source. No mystery. No magic. And no hope of a UFO from this plain jane, perfectly terrestrial technology.
shredderofmass 2 years ago 20
point is...it floats
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
He says "No one knows for sure" , actually we do. It has been proven to NOT work in a vacuum. So it is absolutely not anti gravity. It would never work outside an atmosphere. It is absolutely proven to be ion wind. Look up 'ion engines' on how things work and you can see that in a way the technology is already being used in space. An Ion engine brings its own gas (argon perhaps) along in a tank.
shredderofmass 2 years ago
@shredderofmass It's a demonstration that it can be done...it's obviously not the exact form of anti-gravity as we think of in flying saucers,its a smaller version...it demonstrates what can be done. An ion is an atom or molecule where the total number of electrons is not equal to the total number of protons, giving it a net positive or negative electrical charge. An ion thruster is a form of electric propulsion used for spacecraft propulsion that creates thrust by accelerating ions.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@shredderofmass check out this profile and video.... Alienscientist - The Secret to Anti-Gravity REVEALED!
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@LMAO0O0O0 Points is, it's not antigravity. Balloons float, boats float, they aren't exhibiting antigravity.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
@UnderManiac the common bond they all share are the "steps to anti-gravity" Understanding how to overcome gravity in different forms. The ion induced device utilizes air flow yes. The whole point is gravity is manipulated with no moving parts. No it isnt a warp drive machine but space IS manipulated and gravity overcome.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@LMAO0O0O0 Ah, but space is not manipulated. Space around the object stays the same. The claim is that the foil device is anti-gravity. It is not. Not as far as birds, airplanes, and balloons utilize anti-gravity techniques. Gravity is overcome, yes, but we hop and gravity is overcome for an instant.
They are holding to the false belief that their device IS anti-gravity. I'd concede if they would admit it's only a device to overcome gravity, in a different way. An electron thruster.
UnderManiac 2 years ago
Flying saucers use a power source to"overcome" gravity as well. For every action there is a reaction.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@LMAO0O0O0 Flying saucers? I've never seen one of these, nor has anyone else. If there were such things, they'd be suspended by other means than "anti-gravity". What most people don't understand, and some refuse to understand, is that gravity is not a force. Einstein even said so. I don't know how many times I explain gravity but you don't want to listen. You'd have to unbend space-time to achieve "anti-gravity".
UnderManiac 2 years ago
which is wat saucers do...don't be one of those people who say the earth is flat before you literaly see it's round. Your smarter than that...that i can see.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@LMAO0O0O0 And, since you're so learned on the way flying saucers operate, tell me how do they manipulate space-time in order to achieve "anti-gravity".
Personally, I don't believe that flying saucers have ever visited earth. There'd be no reason for them to do so. Especially within the last 50 years or so. Astronomers would certainly have seen them, since they're always looking at the night sky. No alien craft would be able to elude the myriad of telescopes that are trained on the night sky
UnderManiac 2 years ago
Research...The Disclosure Project..A ton of answers for you. Your smart enough to know Enstien was correct reguarding bending space time...so there must be a way to do it. If Einstein knew the answer on how to acheieve anti-gravity and you back that theory up...why shoot down the possibility?
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@shredderofmass Your right this is terrestrial made...and thats the point. We humans are on that step and anti-gravity can be made once u know the formula. You say this isn't magic...but yet it is magical. you label it with words and deny it defies gravity, when right in front of your eyes it does just that. You know the formula and think that knowing makes this nothing special....when right in front of your eyes it is floating. Silently it hovers with no visable means of propulsion.
LMAO0O0O0 2 years ago
@shredderofmass News Flash!! It is not "ion wind" smoke tests have been done to prove that. mgcox is wrong also, it works even better in a vacuum since since the absence of oxygen reduces arcing which makes this "lifter" drop like a brick. The biggest drawback is it cannot lift itself and it's power supply. So it is only useful in a weightless environment. I have built one myself (really easy) no moving parts and it jumps up in a snap. note it must be tethered or it becomes a human bug zapper.
72chevelle156 1 year ago
@72chevelle156
The evidence for these working in a vacuum remains to be seen.
Even if it does, it doesn't only oppose in the direction of gravity, so whatever levitation it is, it certainly isn't antgravity.
seansalvador1 1 year ago
@72chevelle156
Plus, even if it did work in a vacuum it could be explained as action on virtual particles.
I'm not suggesting it is, but as i said before, the thrust is not only opposed to the direction of gravity. Therefore it is not anti gravity.
It may be a mystery how it works, but the mechanism has not yet been explained other than ion wind and the anti gravity claim also remains to be seen.
seansalvador1 1 year ago
@72chevelle156 So it is anti -gravity that only works in a weightless environment? Thats a scream. Have you ever tried it in a vacuum? Yes, sorry, it is ion wind. Vacuum tests of these devices have been done, they sit there like a limp of stuff, no motion whatsoever.
shredderofmass 1 year ago
@shredderofmass I don't think I use the term anti-gravity. Let me come at this a little different. Successful vacuum tests are horizontal. This has made me curious though you seem to be familiar with ion wind I was wondering if ion wind could make something move as fast as the lifter jumps when activated? I think I am going to make another one what the hay its fun.
72chevelle156 1 year ago
@72chevelle156
Its been shown to NOT work in a vacuum. If you can do that you'll win the nobel. And yes Ion wind could cause it to jump. The proof is by removing the air (vacuum) . They have never worked in a vacuum. You can try this yourself. Like I said, get it to work in a vacuum and you win the nobel prize. Prove me wrong, I would truly like it.
shredderofmass 1 year ago
@shredderofmass IT DOES NOT MOVE AIR AND DOES WORK IN A VACUUM. TRY IT BEFORE COMMENTING.
KryderExploration 1 year ago
@KryderExploration Again, you are completely and totally wrong. You say this with such strong caps but you have not tried it yourself . It has been done, it has been proven wrong. It is Ion wind, it does move the are, and it does not work in a vacuum. There are videos of them being tested in a vacuum and failing, which they have to because it is ion wind. Also there are smoke tests showing wind. Wishful thinking on your part.
shredderofmass 1 year ago
This is fun. It reminds me of the experiments NASA did with 'flying capacitors'. Something like if you have a spinning particle in a gravity field it will produce it's own field according to its spin.
BrianVandrian 2 years ago
i think it levitates because there is a magnetic field in the top wire strong enough to attract the frame and since the frame can't get to the wire it pulls itself up and of the ground
MrBoombam1 2 years ago
This isn't actually anti gravity ya know.
TokyoZeplin 2 years ago
I love how reporters confuse elementary terms, like measuring power in terms of volts. I think electronics should be a required course today, on par with English or Psychology. I mean, it's all around us. Check out Electrodynamic tether in wikipedia. It explains some of the recent electromagnetic thrust technology that NASA has been experimenting with in space.
themanyone 2 years ago
works by moving air... doesn't work in a vacuum... not anti gravity
mgcox 2 years ago 11
@mgcox IT DOES NOT MOVE THE AIR AND DOES WORK IN A VACUUM. TRY IT BEFORE YOU COMMENT.
KryderExploration 1 year ago
Oh, we're getting dumber than ever...
Anyone remembers Brown's work ?
So, if you do, what's new here ?
oztronix 2 years ago
Comment removed
HeavyMetal1981Fan 2 years ago
If you look outside of the device, nearby in the room, you can see the electrostatic field generators (old tech) that are anchored to the floor and are not part of the levitating, aluminum/balsa device. This means the device is hopelessly dependent up the fixed, earth-borne electrostatic generators. Getting those to fly too is what one requires to have a truly flying device. And no one has shown incontrovertible evidence of having done that yet. In fact, when you think about it, it's needed.
determinist48 2 years ago
Its NOT an electromagnetic field. It is electrostatic, so it produces a weak magnetic-field at best. A magnetic field reqires current-flow, but the Biefeld-Brown effet does not, jsut a decent enough potential to produce primary-ionisation.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
on mythbusters they showed that it was thrust and not anti gravity. They put it in a vacuum and it didnt work.
cbjewelers0com 2 years ago
Mythbusters botched the experiment, and are mistaken. Mythbusters also botched the Bedini motor, which many have replicated and have charging batteries as we speak. Mythbusters are corporate kiss-butts. The effect is 100-million times more powerful thrust than ion-wind, and works more efficiently in a vacuum.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
i cant say one way or the other since i havent researched this myself.. but your definitely right and theres a few things i've seen on mythbusters that i dont agree with at all... i definitely know when they did the one on the moon landing that if they found it to be faked theres no way they'd be allowed to show it..
and i hate that someone gave me a thumbs down when i was just stating what was on mythbusters...
jeeeeeeeeeeez
cbjewelers0com 2 years ago 3
It is just one of many formerly CLASSIFIED electronic space drives, which are OVER-UNITY. The OIL companies would rather you not know about free energy devices and systems, their insane profits would plummet, and with that would also plummet sooty air-pollution and global warming.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
definitely right about that one.. theres supposedly a device that puts out more energy than it takes to power which if true, defiyes the known laws of physics
cbjewelers0com 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Gravity is if the effect observed between two entities when the illusion of space apparently shrinks as the universe's entangled virtual plus and minus particles become more entangled due to precession eventually resolving back to zero, the more two entities are entangled the more similar they are and closer they appear to be. Gravity is not a force but a relative observational effect as is time and space, distance and speed. An entity affects another entity to the degree it is in tune and phase
spacedecoy 2 years ago
put it in a vacuum then see what happens. its just air thrust
groundfirez 2 years ago
It has been put in vacuum from 1930s to 2008 (TT Brown, HONDA R & D) Takaaki Musha-2007 AIAA, and it is seen that without the loses of corona in air, they work more efficiently for less-current in vaccum, and it has also been shown with anemometers (wind-speedometers) and simple algebra that the force is orders of magnitude greater than what Ion-wind can account for (there is a physical limit to ion-thrust). Thomas Townsend Brown called it ELECTROGRAVITY (artificial gravity).
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
I have to ask, Does this sort of technology offer any sort of applicable tasks other than gawking at a small aluminum foil model in your backyard or garage, I mean... Does it have forward thrust, not just the ability to hover in place, and does the hover height depend on the amount of current going through the wires?
If possible could we build a massive one with an internal generator and the ability to carry at least 1 human and some cargo? If it's possible are there any other apps for it?
unholydegas 2 years ago
I replicated the forward-thrust TT Brown saucer patent in 1990. The three-foot diameter saucers flew BACKWARDS, covered in plastic, in Reno, Nevada in the year 2000.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
The Germans built manned and unmanned such craft starting in the 1930s and 1940s, sponsored by the VRIL and THULE German Alternative Energy societies. The German Rocket Society, heded by Hermann Oberth, and had a young Werner von Braun as a member, gave us ballistic missiles, and manned and unmanned space. With electrogravitics. the universe is open to humans from Sol III (Earth).
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
In this special he talks of how the germans made an anti gravity craft but during WW2 the united states found it and disessembled it and brought it back to the states. When they reessembled it, it didn't work
Yessssssssss 2 years ago
Disinformation. It worked. And may other systems as well. Many methods and systems of artificial gravity and gravity control. MOST of the UFOS seen and filmed are military. SOME are alien. That's the whole point!
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
very interesting....
Yessssssssss 2 years ago
This reverses NO gravity at all. It uses the same force that a helicopter does. Prove it?
Well like they even said in the video the electricity ionizes air around it and pushes it downward. Once there is enough air being pushed down the contraption rises. same thing happens with a helicopter when the blades rotating force the air down.
Enough lift to balance out the force of gravity and u go liftoff, but not anti gravity.
poon5000 2 years ago
personally I believe if it floats without strings, it defeats gravity
Yessssssssss 2 years ago
it only defeats gravity if you throw it up and it never comes back down, thats anti gravity. what that video is demonstrating is thrust, if you disconnect the electricity it falls or if you put it in a vacuum, nothing happens.
groundfirez 2 years ago
if they never unplugged it, it wouldn't have come back down, as far as I'm concerned, this guy defeated gravity
Yessssssssss 2 years ago
A helicopter or any wing traveling in air is sucked into the air by the partial-pressure created on the wing-upper surface; a helicopter is "sucked" into the air, and I have flown helis for nearly 24-years, and I can show you the formulae why this is so. Anemometer tests with the devices and the mesurement in dynes of the thrust generated, and operation in vacuum and under oil for 80-years have shon this to be an efficient DIPOLE space drive, that has no inertia, and should go almost c.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
this is as much antigravity as you are experiencing while you jump. just a force temporarily working in the opposite direction of gravity. but not antigravity.
javajimmy1090 3 years ago
Are there air molecules in space? NOPE. Bose-einstine condensate is way more suseptable for space travel. (Fuck my spelling)
AlexIsonSanders 3 years ago
THis is no more anti gravity then the airplane is.
RagingCaveman 3 years ago
Ditto...
Kori114 3 years ago
It would appear that we have finally seen the first stages of antigravity. I always related UFO's that people have seen to a magnetic field I would imagine that this is publicly the first sign of antigravity. However if you have seen a UFO you seen an array of lights this would be from the magnetic field conflicting with the atmosphere. Perhaps it is only a matter of time before governments admit to the tech they have had for many years. I doubt it though eventually it will be obvious though.
Xc00lX8 3 years ago
The UFO's People have been seeing appears to be antigravity tech from Governments the strange coloring in the sky is most likely from the electromagnetic field conflicting with the atmosphere. I would think it is only a matter of time before it comes out.
Xc00lX8 3 years ago
This is anti gravity the gov has had it for years People have been reporting these for years it is a matter of time before the world knows what they have been seeing. It works using a magnetic field that is why people report when seeing ufo's strange colored lights that is the magnetic field interacting with the atmosphere I have been waiting to see this it was surprising and it should be a matter of time until it is finally revealed about what a UFO is and how it is made. THis
Xc00lX8 3 years ago
Hip hip zakstop! I concur. However, SOMEBODY has really come up with it and my personal hero Nick Cook in this video needs to check her and him out ASAP before they dissapear into self-inflicted American Amnesia. Her name is Dr. Ning Li of UA d-o-t EDU and Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov of BAESYSTEMS d-o-t COM. Real BONA-FIDE anti-gravity not this ion wind foolishness.
BTW bigkillerjellibean94 its IONS not IRONS. B-I-G DIFFERENCE in mass!
Spookysr 3 years ago
it has nothing to do with gravity. your increasing the desinty of irons in the air, wich are draged down thru the gaps of the shape of the ship, which us triangular. and there for giving thrust. if you have it in any other shape, it will fail, if you put it in an air vacum, it will fail for there is no iron in the air for it to increase the desinity by! ^.^ hoped i helped
bigkillerjellibean94 3 years ago
Precisely. Although gravity is merely a magnetic force, so we can reasonably that lift through an electrical field would be, indeed, defying gravity.
ORUPRANKSTAZ 3 years ago
Who has decided gravity is a magnetic force? There is no known graviton to fit with the electron needed for electromagnetics. Nobody really understands what gravity is which is why nobody really has come up with anything close to an anti-gravity device.
zakstop 3 years ago
i knew it had something to do with magnetic fields.
RyukoX 3 years ago
Very interesting.
ALIEN CASEBOOK - HOME <<<Google it.
blueyeswise 3 years ago