to my knowledge there is NO EVIDENCE that implies 9/11 was planned by our government. no confessions, (we're talking 1,000's of people here, all keeping their mouths shut.) no sightings of any passengers aboard the planes, no traces of any explosive substances (and there should be an abundance of it in order to bring down those buildings.) Just skepticism and a whole bunch of other nullified BS.
yes skepticism and nullified bs, and that's all that those people have brought to the table too.
now if you could show me a blueprint for the explosives set in the building, a soundbite of bush giving the military the green light to fly the "missles" into the towers, or any CONFESSIONS (which is what i meant when i was talking about people keeping their mouths shut.) i might jump on to your insane theory.
we can figure out who done it after we figure out how it was done. office fires DO NOT "collapse" steel buildings at or near free fall speed into their own footprint.
and i would have assumed that you were someone who believes the earth is flat, and that we didn't land on the moon and that the skipper from gilligan's island killed jfk.
gimme a break, NIST used "hot water over a tight jar lid" to explain a "new phenomena" now know as "thermal expansion" that caused the symmetrical, progressive (at free fall speed?) collapse of 7 World Trade and you bought that load of crap.
The official story is simply someone else's hypothesis (theory) and "some" people are gullible enough to believe it. "Some" people still believe the earth is flat too.
Fuel burns off very quickly. Office furniture and supplies do not creat the heat to weaken steel in that short of a time.
Take a cutting torch which burns far far hotter then the best open fuel fires can. See how long it takes you to cut thru just regular steel plating. And thats not structural steel with is stronger.
It takes a considerable amount of time with the cutting torch focused on a small area very slowly allowing you to cut thru.
while I was thinking about your video I had an idea:
to put in a public place a big fire burning not for minutes not for hours but for whatever time it will be necessary to convince the skeptics once for all that it is impossible to melt steel in this way.
Of course it could be a little difficoult to get the authorisation to do something like that but perhaps in some isolated place like where they do "the burning man" it could be done.
haha someone gave me a poor comment point because i'm right.
lordjared 3 years ago
hahaha wasnt me :o) if i was going to give you the thumbs down i would have started a long time ago. i dont fear debate
LOL ever consider the "poor" rating was based on some other form of reasoning? ;o)
ALITL8 3 years ago
what "evidence"?
to my knowledge there is NO EVIDENCE that implies 9/11 was planned by our government. no confessions, (we're talking 1,000's of people here, all keeping their mouths shut.) no sightings of any passengers aboard the planes, no traces of any explosive substances (and there should be an abundance of it in order to bring down those buildings.) Just skepticism and a whole bunch of other nullified BS.
lordjared 3 years ago
skepticism and nullified BS?
1550+ that arent keeping their mouths shut
140+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
600+ Engineers and Architects
130+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
300+ Professors Question 9/11
170+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals
210+ 9/11 "Survivors and Family Members"
ALITL8 3 years ago
yes skepticism and nullified bs, and that's all that those people have brought to the table too.
now if you could show me a blueprint for the explosives set in the building, a soundbite of bush giving the military the green light to fly the "missles" into the towers, or any CONFESSIONS (which is what i meant when i was talking about people keeping their mouths shut.) i might jump on to your insane theory.
lordjared 3 years ago
we can figure out who done it after we figure out how it was done. office fires DO NOT "collapse" steel buildings at or near free fall speed into their own footprint.
ALITL8 3 years ago
you sir, are a doofus.
lordjared 3 years ago
variables like a commercial airliner at 500 mph?
and i would have assumed that you were someone who believes the earth is flat, and that we didn't land on the moon and that the skipper from gilligan's island killed jfk.
lordjared 3 years ago
nope, earth is round (sorta) and to "assume" generally leads to making an Ass out of U and Me.
too much evidence completely omitted and not investigated, too many questions went unanswered.
there NEEDS to be an "independent" investigation. we were NOT attacked because are rich and/or free.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
ALITL8 3 years ago
"that's the PROOF right there." perfect.
only that you're missing about a million variables...
lordjared 3 years ago
variables like "the conservation of momentum"?
gimme a break, NIST used "hot water over a tight jar lid" to explain a "new phenomena" now know as "thermal expansion" that caused the symmetrical, progressive (at free fall speed?) collapse of 7 World Trade and you bought that load of crap.
The official story is simply someone else's hypothesis (theory) and "some" people are gullible enough to believe it. "Some" people still believe the earth is flat too.
ALITL8 3 years ago
Fuel burns off very quickly. Office furniture and supplies do not creat the heat to weaken steel in that short of a time.
Take a cutting torch which burns far far hotter then the best open fuel fires can. See how long it takes you to cut thru just regular steel plating. And thats not structural steel with is stronger.
It takes a considerable amount of time with the cutting torch focused on a small area very slowly allowing you to cut thru.
JasonBrumfeld 3 years ago
yea, especially "structural" steel... ever seen how they make that stuff??
ALITL8 3 years ago
common sense at last!
theonlyreallaz 3 years ago
thats really all it is... what's sad is that it appears no one has any :o/
ALITL8 3 years ago
while I was thinking about your video I had an idea:
to put in a public place a big fire burning not for minutes not for hours but for whatever time it will be necessary to convince the skeptics once for all that it is impossible to melt steel in this way.
Of course it could be a little difficoult to get the authorisation to do something like that but perhaps in some isolated place like where they do "the burning man" it could be done.
theonlyreallaz 3 years ago