dude we would if it wouldnt cause some other countrys like oh lets say china or russia to drop h bombs on us... eventually destroying the earth plus we wont thanks to brinksmenship and detente
You NEVER threaten to wipe out entire countries with nuclear weapons. That's simply immoral. You're threatening to murder billions of innocents under the excuse that they're the 'enemy'. That labels you as a genocidal monster who's no better than the 'evil ones' you say you want to kill. Don't be that one.
Hey I just thought about this, but doesn't that make the US genocidal monsters for murdering Japanese civilians with the A-bombs since they weren't part of the military?
fear is what drive's hate, people fear what they don't understand they hate it becuase they fear, nuclear weapon was made out of fear, russa and all other nation hate us because we have what they have, we are in a even battle ground and thats when fear and hate comes in, fearing who or when will strike first, and so they hate it because they don't whant to be known as the men who brought war world...
Actually, a hydrogen bomb uses a fission bomb (atom bomb) as its first stage. The fusing of hydrogen, in fact, doesn't contribute much to the overall power of the device: instead, it feeds and compresses the original fission reaction, ensuring greater efficiency, and more power, from the fission stage.
I read a book on this. They said if dropped on New York it would have obliterated all 5 Burroughs. The fire ball alone was 3.5 miles wide. It takes an atom bomb just to start the primary ignition on one of these things. That gets the deuterium fusing with each other then you have started the process of the Sun.
A shame humanity has to dream these nightmares up.
MDBurck: 50Mt is 3300 times more powerful than 15kt (approx. Little Boy yield). I don't know where you've got your 650'000 times figure from, but it's wrong.
why dont you all just shut up. Nuclear bombs were built for one thing, to whipe out people, and that it will. soon world war 3 will be upon your doorstep. just watch the B52's flying over.
You won't see B-52's flying over. They'll be going over Russia.
The Russian citizens won't see them either because the B-52s will launch long range cruise missiles from a few thousand miles away from their targets. Besides, the warheads that destroy cities will come from submarine launched missiles.
are you really so neive to think that the americans will dare to attack russia with atomic weapons? the russians have just as many as you and far bigger ones than u america will loose out a lot more than russia will
clsteele speaks the truth. Russia actually has more ICBMS then the US. They also developed much more powerful ones to compensate for their inaccuracy. Attacking Russia would be suicide.
exactly whilst their 50mt bomb was never put into production it was a very gd demonstration to the us that if they started a war russia would give them a hell of a battering to say the least!
Excuse me bubba, but the President of Iran is the only one threatening anyone with nuclear war. Just type it into the u-tube search and find out yourself. He says he sees a future without America and Israel. He says Israel should be wiped off the map and they are currently persuing atomic energy. All they will have to do then is get a cheap scud missle for under 100,000 dollars, put them together and fire. We are in the END TIMES.
actually, you're quoting a common misinterpretation. He never said Israel should be wiped off the map. And who's he threatening with nuclear war when they dont have any nuclear weapons?
I hope you realize, John, that it was the US that over through the democratic system of Iran in 1950, after Winston Churchill told us "Iran is on the thread of falling to Communism". So we went, invaded Iran, over through the government, and put in a dictator that would do what we want. And now you want to invade again? No wonder the entire world completely despises the US.
And lol, Iran is the only one threatening the world with nuclear war? They have about enough material to make 1 bomb. A weak fission bomb. While America and Russia have 10,000 nuclear missiles each, both aimed at each other, ready to launch them any minute. If one country makes a mistake, we all fucking die. Iran isn't a threat. As long as we stay out of their business, they won't do anything.
mmm very true russia would most likely come off better from a direct nuclear conflict with the states as its a far far bigger nation so harder to fully nuke :) iran there nuke would be more like a dirty bomb in all respects it was created from stolen intel from sum pakistani spy ^o)
but its mor elike 8000 missiles each lol well at least war heads nt sure bout the mssile part
You don't have to fully cover a country with missiles. All it takes is 10 missiles to cause serious damage. 1 missile to newyork, washington dc, detroit, chicago, atlanta, los angelos, houston, new orleans, miami, san fransisco. Do you know how many millions of lives that is, with 10 nuclear missiles? Russia has highly concentrated population.
That is a load of crap. The mount st. helens eruption alone was more powerful then a hydrogen bomb. Man can make some powerful explosions, but in the face of nature its nothing. Volcanoes have away more exposive power, and so do asteroids.
because it is powered by nuclear fusion AND fission. Fission makes the heat. Fusion makes a bigger explosion. And its not the atomic age after the hydrogen bomb, its the thermonuclear age
no mostly fission we rarely ever use fusion it's much more complicated, though lately we have been trying to stabilize fusion to create power. And you can't do fission and fusion at the same time it's one or another. U only have a certain amount of Uranium 238.
Nearly all the energy is fusion (thus thermonuclear and not atomic). A P-239 or U-235 "fuze" (using fission => atomic) is used to generate the initial heat to begin the fusion process btw H-3 and H-2. The fuze is essentially a small version of the atomic bomb.
if ur talking about a shock wave or blast they both have one, the hydrogen is much more powerful so the shock wave could be more defined. if thats what ur talkin about.
i wonder how many of you googled your answers for this video, yeah i know the yeild, you even know what a megaton stands for, hint it has to do with TNT. and not the channel. and the the only difference really is that the ussr just put alot more uranium 239 or 235 or whatever, all that matters is their contry is fucked. some super power.
It is your country that has developed Dirty Nuclear weapons, which can spread radioactive material over a significant portion of the planet. These weapons are designed with a half-life of five years. Five years of radiation would kill nearly all life in the affected area, and basically fuck the world.
Google for Cobalt Nuclear weapons to read more on these. Oh, and their country has been fucked since the 80's... their arms program is non-existent. They're not a superpower.
A neutron bomb is not a thermonuclear weapon. A neutron bomb is a weapon deployed at high altitudes that emits deadly radioactive particles that kill people but do not hurt things.
H bomb is not the stronger. N bomb has similar structure but more fusion radiation (fusion is stronger than fision). H-bomb is like 50-50. N-bomb is like 90fusion-10fision.
The H-bomb is the same thing as the nutron bomb. A nutron bomb is just a Thermonuclear weapon used at high altitudes. Also nuclear weapons have never been tested to cause that effect because it is imposible.
Yes, it is. Atomic is the weaker one. H-bomb is the strongest in design. But the actual strength of the detonation depends on the amount of fuel, measured in megatons, that the bomb had before it exploded.
10mt
sprengmeister00 3 months ago
Lets use these to wipe out North Korea and Iran!!!!
AmericanAirlinesRule 2 years ago
you are a dumb ass
winfriedstar 2 years ago
The only dumbass here is you.
AmericanAirlinesRule 2 years ago
No, you are the first dumbass of the world
winfriedstar 2 years ago
dude we would if it wouldnt cause some other countrys like oh lets say china or russia to drop h bombs on us... eventually destroying the earth plus we wont thanks to brinksmenship and detente
BBU4life 2 years ago
You NEVER threaten to wipe out entire countries with nuclear weapons. That's simply immoral. You're threatening to murder billions of innocents under the excuse that they're the 'enemy'. That labels you as a genocidal monster who's no better than the 'evil ones' you say you want to kill. Don't be that one.
HighwayNeptune 2 years ago
Hey I just thought about this, but doesn't that make the US genocidal monsters for murdering Japanese civilians with the A-bombs since they weren't part of the military?
UntamedWalrus 2 years ago
noob. think of all the free space
Desktop10101 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HighwayNeptune no its because other countries have nuclear weopens too
ilikebeubz 1 year ago
the first monster !
v3nuclear 2 years ago
No one wanna this in there backyards :P
ShidoBlue 2 years ago
fuck.
Dylanshreds1 2 years ago
fear is what drive's hate, people fear what they don't understand they hate it becuase they fear, nuclear weapon was made out of fear, russa and all other nation hate us because we have what they have, we are in a even battle ground and thats when fear and hate comes in, fearing who or when will strike first, and so they hate it because they don't whant to be known as the men who brought war world...
nuyorican7 2 years ago
Hehe, Tence...
But think...With all that...power :3
Oyiket 3 years ago
wow.................
WG23456 3 years ago
they should try make a sun bomb by making a atom bomb with a hydrojen bomb
PopeAssassins 3 years ago
Actually, a hydrogen bomb uses a fission bomb (atom bomb) as its first stage. The fusing of hydrogen, in fact, doesn't contribute much to the overall power of the device: instead, it feeds and compresses the original fission reaction, ensuring greater efficiency, and more power, from the fission stage.
nivikliriak 3 years ago
ok lol
PopeAssassins 3 years ago
I read a book on this. They said if dropped on New York it would have obliterated all 5 Burroughs. The fire ball alone was 3.5 miles wide. It takes an atom bomb just to start the primary ignition on one of these things. That gets the deuterium fusing with each other then you have started the process of the Sun.
A shame humanity has to dream these nightmares up.
roquefortfiles 3 years ago
MDBurck: 50Mt is 3300 times more powerful than 15kt (approx. Little Boy yield). I don't know where you've got your 650'000 times figure from, but it's wrong.
Karat6 3 years ago
Mike was about 10 megatons... The Tzar Bomba was 50 megatons. 50 megatons=650,000 Hiroshima bombs.
MDBurck 3 years ago
2012 is my guess for ww3
sabresdudeman61 4 years ago
WWIII will be our future! Bombs were made for warfare!
EmperorofDark 4 years ago
why dont you all just shut up. Nuclear bombs were built for one thing, to whipe out people, and that it will. soon world war 3 will be upon your doorstep. just watch the B52's flying over.
breezeer 4 years ago
You won't see B-52's flying over. They'll be going over Russia.
The Russian citizens won't see them either because the B-52s will launch long range cruise missiles from a few thousand miles away from their targets. Besides, the warheads that destroy cities will come from submarine launched missiles.
airraideagle 4 years ago
u re playing too much warfare games..
take a break..
baknedicem 4 years ago
are you really so neive to think that the americans will dare to attack russia with atomic weapons? the russians have just as many as you and far bigger ones than u america will loose out a lot more than russia will
clsteele 4 years ago
clsteele speaks the truth. Russia actually has more ICBMS then the US. They also developed much more powerful ones to compensate for their inaccuracy. Attacking Russia would be suicide.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
exactly whilst their 50mt bomb was never put into production it was a very gd demonstration to the us that if they started a war russia would give them a hell of a battering to say the least!
clsteele 4 years ago
fuck america and russia and every else state taht builds atomic weapons......u will destroy the earth in near future
ihr gottverdammten hurensöhne
have no fear for atomic energie
lordhelmchen5252 4 years ago
Excuse me bubba, but the President of Iran is the only one threatening anyone with nuclear war. Just type it into the u-tube search and find out yourself. He says he sees a future without America and Israel. He says Israel should be wiped off the map and they are currently persuing atomic energy. All they will have to do then is get a cheap scud missle for under 100,000 dollars, put them together and fire. We are in the END TIMES.
johnlewisbrooks 4 years ago
actually, you're quoting a common misinterpretation. He never said Israel should be wiped off the map. And who's he threatening with nuclear war when they dont have any nuclear weapons?
lilscottyurine 4 years ago
Hello? If they know how to make atomic energy, which they do, all they have to do is get a cheap 100,000$ scud missle, or make a dirty bomb!
johnlewisbrooks 4 years ago
I hope you realize, John, that it was the US that over through the democratic system of Iran in 1950, after Winston Churchill told us "Iran is on the thread of falling to Communism". So we went, invaded Iran, over through the government, and put in a dictator that would do what we want. And now you want to invade again? No wonder the entire world completely despises the US.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
And lol, Iran is the only one threatening the world with nuclear war? They have about enough material to make 1 bomb. A weak fission bomb. While America and Russia have 10,000 nuclear missiles each, both aimed at each other, ready to launch them any minute. If one country makes a mistake, we all fucking die. Iran isn't a threat. As long as we stay out of their business, they won't do anything.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
mmm very true russia would most likely come off better from a direct nuclear conflict with the states as its a far far bigger nation so harder to fully nuke :) iran there nuke would be more like a dirty bomb in all respects it was created from stolen intel from sum pakistani spy ^o)
but its mor elike 8000 missiles each lol well at least war heads nt sure bout the mssile part
clsteele 4 years ago
You don't have to fully cover a country with missiles. All it takes is 10 missiles to cause serious damage. 1 missile to newyork, washington dc, detroit, chicago, atlanta, los angelos, houston, new orleans, miami, san fransisco. Do you know how many millions of lives that is, with 10 nuclear missiles? Russia has highly concentrated population.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
Yep. It's official. In one sigular nucler strike, the whole world can be destroyed.
johnlewisbrooks 4 years ago
10 nuclear missiles each missiles carrys about to nuclear war heads now i think ^o) interesting haha
clsteele 4 years ago
waste of life
Prpht 4 years ago
they say when the hydrogen bomb was tested, that was the cause of the earth on a 48 degree axis is
smokenofire9 4 years ago
That is a load of crap. The mount st. helens eruption alone was more powerful then a hydrogen bomb. Man can make some powerful explosions, but in the face of nature its nothing. Volcanoes have away more exposive power, and so do asteroids.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
how powerful was mt st helens then?
clsteele 4 years ago
24 megatons, 9 MT more powerful then the largest hydrogen bomb ever detonated by the US.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
ooh ok lol russion nuke was twice as powerful as that then and would have been four times if they adnt have replaced the damper:)
clsteele 4 years ago
Also, when asteroids hit us, its way more powerful then a nuclear weapon.
mellowmaromi1 4 years ago
damn straight
FvckNvts 3 years ago
depends on how big the asteroid is.
Gazzy1500 3 years ago
Bet they didn't expect this shit for the first bomb test can you imagine the sound!!!
DieKantSeOu 4 years ago
kickass
peripatetikerQC 4 years ago
Mike didn't destroy Eniwetak but left a huge crater on its northern coast which is clearly visible in Google Earth
IanMathewson1 4 years ago
the power of that bomb is equivalent to a train stretching all the way from New York to Seattle loaded full with TNT.
That's a big boom
electioneer1313 4 years ago
because it is powered by nuclear fusion AND fission. Fission makes the heat. Fusion makes a bigger explosion. And its not the atomic age after the hydrogen bomb, its the thermonuclear age
Hypnotoad582 4 years ago
no mostly fission we rarely ever use fusion it's much more complicated, though lately we have been trying to stabilize fusion to create power. And you can't do fission and fusion at the same time it's one or another. U only have a certain amount of Uranium 238.
mikeatheman 4 years ago
Nearly all the energy is fusion (thus thermonuclear and not atomic). A P-239 or U-235 "fuze" (using fission => atomic) is used to generate the initial heat to begin the fusion process btw H-3 and H-2. The fuze is essentially a small version of the atomic bomb.
ikedasquid 4 years ago
point taken, i stand corrected.
mikeatheman 4 years ago
What is that circle that forms when the H-bomb explodes? And how come other nuclear bombs don't look like that?
crazydave55811 4 years ago
Because this one is the most powerful
Questpeace 4 years ago
if ur talking about a shock wave or blast they both have one, the hydrogen is much more powerful so the shock wave could be more defined. if thats what ur talkin about.
mikeatheman 4 years ago
i wonder how many of you googled your answers for this video, yeah i know the yeild, you even know what a megaton stands for, hint it has to do with TNT. and not the channel. and the the only difference really is that the ussr just put alot more uranium 239 or 235 or whatever, all that matters is their contry is fucked. some super power.
TheGodDamnedBatman 4 years ago
It is your country that has developed Dirty Nuclear weapons, which can spread radioactive material over a significant portion of the planet. These weapons are designed with a half-life of five years. Five years of radiation would kill nearly all life in the affected area, and basically fuck the world.
Google for Cobalt Nuclear weapons to read more on these. Oh, and their country has been fucked since the 80's... their arms program is non-existent. They're not a superpower.
ChazTheRipper 4 years ago
the tasar bomb had a yeild of 57 megatond... more than 5 times more powerful than the ivey mike which had only 10.5 megatons
KrazyJew109 4 years ago
A neutron bomb is not a thermonuclear weapon. A neutron bomb is a weapon deployed at high altitudes that emits deadly radioactive particles that kill people but do not hurt things.
13thframe 5 years ago
tasr bomba was bigger
mushroom cloud went 35 miles into the atmosphere and the shock wave was measurable on its third pass around the world in newyork
it also blew out windows in holland
lolwowarriors 5 years ago
very cool
videoviewer224 5 years ago
Yep. The neutron bomb is frightening. Like Chyrnoble but worse.
56BUICKRiviera 5 years ago
Thats not a neutron bomb 56BUICKRiviera.
gamefan1980 4 years ago
I know. I was commenting about the amount of radiation the N bomb puts out Gamefan. I don't think any footage of a N bomb exists.
56BUICKRiviera 4 years ago
You people see that "boreal" after the explosion?
Thats is the plasma state of the hydrogen, because of the high temperature.
jpaulom 5 years ago
scary
corrupt0 5 years ago
H bomb is not the stronger. N bomb has similar structure but more fusion radiation (fusion is stronger than fision). H-bomb is like 50-50. N-bomb is like 90fusion-10fision.
Scary.
corrupt0 5 years ago
The H-bomb is the same thing as the nutron bomb. A nutron bomb is just a Thermonuclear weapon used at high altitudes. Also nuclear weapons have never been tested to cause that effect because it is imposible.
mindlobster 5 years ago
At some points in this video, I didn't know what the hell I was looking at...
track000 5 years ago
Well navunit, it would seem so. Scary isn't it?
BtBaM8 5 years ago
can sombody tell me is the h-bomb the strongest in the world
navunit100 5 years ago
Yes, it is. Atomic is the weaker one. H-bomb is the strongest in design. But the actual strength of the detonation depends on the amount of fuel, measured in megatons, that the bomb had before it exploded.
SentientWolf 5 years ago
Yes, although the largest one built was 50 times more powerful than this. (bit late reply)
ChazTheRipper 4 years ago
Compare this bomb to Tsar
very scary and destructive
RevolverX10 5 years ago
"I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." ~the Bhagavad Gita
aallppiinnee 5 years ago
Awesome
PiccoloNamek 5 years ago
We are animals for the slaughter
HiLlSpEaKeR 5 years ago
my god
capnhands 5 years ago
Scary
WyattGuzman 5 years ago