Seeing as how China is the worlds biggest polluter and the amount of oil that is used to get goods from China to the USA is huge DO NOT BUY THINGS FROM CHINA!!!!
Try my channel for 2011 real climate science conference,It's called 6th International conference on climate change held in The US.Scroll down the uploads column,they are in no particular order however the Q&A videos should be watched after the others and do read my description of the video.Enjoy
Fred Bailey has discovered the underlying nataural mechanism that regulates Sunspot production and Climate Change, there is a connection between them but Sunspots have nothing to do with Climate Change, Google solarchords and you will see for yourself
There is a quick simple solution to global warming. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on by Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. WE NEED IT NOW. The source is deuterium from the World’s Oceans – virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce."..could cost as little as 0.9c per kilowatt" See blog "the Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post.
website “Star Scientific Limited”
Youtube video – “In the Footsteps of Fusion” + youtube channel
A new study in the peer-reviewed science journal "Remote Sensing" has found that United Nations computer models may be incorrect in overstating the amount of global warming that will occur in the future. James M. Taylor says it would be wise for the media, elected officials and climate scientists to recognize the “huge discrepancy” between global warming predictors and NASA’s satellite data.
These denialists hate freedom. Unless they support bombing the military prison that holds patriotic soldier Bradley Manning hostage and freeing him and supporting his and wikileaks' right to free speech, these hypocrite scum support the big-government control of citizens' lives that they have the nerve to accuse environmentalists and climate hawks of supporting.
@mphello I believe that it is you who activists who hate freedom. Why else would you attempt to shove your propaganda down our throats and force us to dump our hard earned cash into Al Gore's pockets, as this so-called climate change action does NOTHING to prevent climate change, as it is a massive hoax. Please recheck your facts and perhaps come up with some better arguments that actually have a hint of truth in them for once. I am sick you activists taking us all for a bunch of naive idiots.
@Recyclojunk64 You are the anti-marxists who put people in prison in American for censoring free speech about Marxism. You are the ones who force your pollution and damaging climate change upon the rest of humanity who does what it can do to conserve.
Clearly, you have no ability to logically calculate the consequences of your actions. That is because you are a stupid conservative. All conservatives are mentally inferior to liberals and radicals. That is a scientific FACT.
@mphello You are the pro-stoneage people who put people in prison in many countrys for making use of modern technology. You are the ones who force your 'lets all be vegetarian stone-agers' propaganda upon humanity who are trying to live life the way God designed it to be.
Clearly, you have no ability to logically calculate the consequences of your actions. That is because you are a stupid alarmist. All alarmists are mentally inferior to skeptics of global warming. That is a scientific FACT.
@Recyclojunk64 And you meat-eaters and anti-environmentalists force BILLIONS of innocent animals (cows, pigs, chickens) each year into the holocaust of factory farms, putting them in crates no larger than their bodies for their entire lives.
But, of course, you shitheads - since you NEVER did a day of work in your lives - REFUSE to acknowledge the hypocrisy of your claims of "loving freedom".
@mphello And you vegetarians and anti-technology activists force BILLIONS of dollars (from pensioners, single parents, farmers, ect.) each year into the black-hole of Al-Gore's pockets, putting them into vaults no larger than 10x10x2 meters for as long as Al-Gore pleases.
But, of course - since you NEVER did a day of real work in your lives - you REFUSE to acknowledge the hypocrisy of your claims "loving the environment"
@Recyclojunk64 And you AGW-deniers refuse to admit that you are all holocaust-deniers and Jew-haters, blaming and scapegoating innocent people (environmentalists, vegans, Jews, hippies) who have NOTHING to do with the current destruction of the world economy and ecology. You worship at the anus of Alex Jones like he's some sort of "god".
You are an embarrassment to 911truthers, who (on the issue of 911) at least have some respectability.
@mphello The very fact that you put the words AGW and Holocaust into one sentence clearly indicates that you are desperate to spread your propaganda that CO2 is a pollutant. I do not really consider myself an AWG denier since there is no need for me to deny it because it is simply a figure of your (and Al-Gore's) imagination. I have nothing against environmentalists (the ones who actually give a damn about the environment) and Jews, although I do question vegans and hippies sometimes.
@mphello It is becoming apparent that you are running out of scientific arguments to back up your view. So far, all that you have said are just accusations towards me that you have assumed.
Firstly, like I have already said, I do not force pollution on others. As you may or may not realise, Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant and is actually beneficial to the environment.
Also, Climate Change is not caused my Man and is only a harmless cycle that the earth goes through. Check your history.
@mphello Please come up with some realistic scientific claims if you wish to have a chance at convincing anyone of your little scam. But why would you waste your life trying to scare people about nothing real anyway? There are better things to do. I find it amusing, but also sad how someone can latch onto a belief that does not have a µBit of scientific fact to back it up and try to force this belief on other innocent people. Personally, I would recommend that you take a trip to the psychiatrist
@mphello How do you expect to fight back at our propaganda when we have none? You are just wasting your time. We fight lies and scams with the truth, and we want to give people the unbiased evidence and real facts, so that they can make their own choice. Whilst, you fight with just biased and altered facts that are designed to make people believe what you want them to believe. In the end, it is the people who determine who wins. Why not take a break from deceiving people and perhaps get a life.
@mphello It is becoming apparent that you may have been brainwashed by Al-Gore and the effects of it are most likely taking their toll on your thinking ability. You have still failed to even give me even one µBit of unbiased scientific information even though I have reminded you to several times. But rather, you are just using the CAPS LOCK key in a desperate effort to make us believe your 'facts'. I am amused by your lack of originality, and insulted that you expect to fool me with these lies.
@Recyclojunk64 AGW-deniers are so discredited these days. They still think the moon-landing was staged,
and that Al Gore either invented or caused the Holocaust.
They think vaccines contain nanobots that control people's minds that turn them gay.AGW-denialism all began with Alex Jones, who thinks 911 was a hologram.
Many AGW-deniers even lie about their USA citizenship, many coming here illegally.
AGW-deniers make millions off their oil-coal connections with the Taliban.
@mphello BTW, I love freedom, and that is why I use only GNU/Linux and other Free Software and I hate it when someone trys to remove my freedom by force. That's why I hate Microsoft and Apple, Adobe, Sony... I would also love to see Bradley Manning released and the governments stop censoring free speech.
@Recyclojunk64 Freedom only for yourself, of course. Or the virtual world.
Or those (like Manning) who don't have any immediate direct effect on your life.
But, when it is YOU who is the oppressor or unfairly negatively affecting others and thereby reducing THEIR freedom to survive and live well (by pollution, by global warming), then you're up in arms.
@mphello Let me get this straight, I never said anything about pollution. I believe that we should not be polluting the environment, (whether it be litter, toxic chemicals, smog, or any other pollutant) for many reasons. Please do not assume that I have no respect for the environment just because I do not believe in the Global Warming hoax. I can see what you mean by negatively affecting others, if it were true that man-made CO2 causes global warming, but fortunately, it does not.
@mphello Please recheck your sources of info. I understand how easy it can be to believe what everyone else says, but remember that just because a belief is mainstream or promoted by some of the worlds 'greatest' scientists, it does not mean that it is true. Remember the Y2K hoax? Everyone wasted money replacing electronic devices since they supposedly would not work in the next millennia. It was just a hoax, but many people were fooled. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
What a shithead: believes some HAARP conspiracies, made-up fairytales created on the internet. But he denies the proven FACT of anthropogenic global warming, proven by THOUSANDS of lines of evidence, published in peer-reviewed journals.
This posted video, “40 Years in 3 Minutes” takes a hard look at an environmental disaster towards the end, while synched to the beat of The Beatles’ GLASS ONION”.
"Perhaps because of its historic use of windmills, the Netherlands has invested heavily in modern wind power. It is now third in the world in offshore wind power generation - of course heavily subsidized by the government. But the new center-right government has decided that continuing the massive subsidies, which include the transfer of 4.5 billion Euros of Dutch tax dollars to a German engineering company to build and run new wind farms, is not, shall we say, defensible."
"The new Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, may have come up with the perfect epitaph for wind power. He reputedly said, "Windmills turn on subsidies." Soon fewer will be turning."
"The John Muir Trust - a "conservation charity," please note - commissioned an engineering study of wind power in the UK. The report is out, and it is revealing. While wind power farms are pitched to investors - really, lawmakers, since wind power only exists because of lavish subsidies from government - as generating, on average, 30% of their maximum output over time, in reality they average only 25%. So wind power delivers about one-sixth less electricity than promised."
Wind turbines are killing many thousands of bats contributing to a population decline that may be costing farmers millions, say researchers. Scientists found the blades of wind turbines were a major threat to bats particularly when they are migrating.
Bats are useful to farmers because they eat large numbers of crop damaging insects, reducing the amount of pesticides.
Writing in the journal Science, the researchers estimated that bats could be worth billions to agriculture around the world.
@PrairleDogged 1) More bats are killed by carsand habitat loss than turbines. 2) A new device is being developed using ultrasound which can be fitted to turbines that allows bats to avoid being hit and University of Aberdeen group recently suggested radar emissions might act as a "bat-scarer".3) If these were added, and turbines were sited at sea or in carefully selected areas then what is your issue with wind turbines?
@PrairleDogged Nope, I was making the point that you don't criticise cars or habitat loss but do criticise non fossil fuel energy sources. In addition if tech was used to protect the bats then what is your issue with wind power over fossil fuels?
Read the following which describes the effects of fossil fuel pollution on wildlife: Effects of industrial air pollution on wildlife .James R. Newman 1979
Air pollution and wildlife toxicology: An overlooked problem - 1988
Turbines at sea ??? yes a great idea ~ nobody can see the carnage below them as the tide washes away the corpses daily ~ it will be a matter of time before some unfortunate mariners die amongst the turbine towers but then you green gimps will say the storm that drove the ship there was due to AGW.
"The feed-in tariff mechanism is fast becoming a scandal. Those lucky enough to own buildings large enough on which to install solar panels or enough land for a wind farm have been receiving 30-40p per kwh, for electricity, which is retailed at only 11p."
" The loss is paid for by a levy on businesses and households. It is astonishing that the Liberals who attach such importance to fairness turn a blind eye to this transfer from poor to rich running to œbillions a year. If you live in a council tower block in Lambeth you don't have much opportunity to get your nose into this trough."
Yes checkyoursources i bet you do have a turbine cash converter ~ there is always a reason for you do gooders to be pushing the hype ~ follow the money.
@PrairleDogged Wow, you sound jealous that I no longer worry as much about oil prices as much you need to, you should get yourself a wind turbine too. I can give advice on where to get a good one. Are you unaware of the subsidies that oil companies get?
What do you have against subsidies going to wind power when it reduces reliance of imported fossil fuels, air pollution and encourages people to use energy more wisely?
The UK has three times the current wind energy needs of the nation.
Jealous? stealing money via subsidies off people who can least afford it to satisfy some crackpot theory is not something any rational person would be jealous of.
Just listen to your crap " encourages people to use energy more wisely"
Seeing as you like to check things out Google 'UK fuel poverty' and see the results of your foolish greed on the elderly ~ scared to put their heating on whilst you rake in a subsidy on their fuel costs.
Thanet wind farm recently opened amidst green hoorays
"Over the coming years we will be giving the wind farm's Swedish owners a total of £1.2 billion in subsidies. That same sum, invested now in a single nuclear power station, could yield a staggering 13 times more electricity, with much greater reliability."
"Fuel Poverty and Cold Will Kill More Elderly People in the UK This Winter"
@PrairleDogged While you criticise small wind power subsidies which help reduce the 2 million deaths worldwide from air pollution you ignore the money being pumped by subsidies into fossil fuels?! In 2009 alone developing countries spent $312bn subsidising coal oil, gas and coal!
p.s. I am not against nuclear power, but it is yet another example of a temporary fix just like oil.
Lord Stern estimated climate damages from fossil fuels of between 5 and 20% of GDP-BBC
Thank you for confirming that the lives of the sick and vulnerable are worth less than your getting a premium for your excess energy ~ you are no better than the Oil Sheiks you castigate for screwing the energy market ~ sleep well do you?
@PrairleDogged Sorry maybe you didn't read my comment : $312bn subsidising coal oil, gas and coal (that's just in developing countries, imagine how big it is developed countries!) vs £1.2 billion for wind, which is a greater number?
How do you sleep knowing you are promoting fossil fuels which kill 2 million prematurely every year through air pollution and fossil fuel prices will rise causing even more damage!
There are $5 of subsidies given to fossil fuels for every $1 for renewables- IEA
@checkyoursources Denialists do not have the mental capacity to do math.
That's because AGW-denialists, like all conservatives, get all their money handed to them from government bailouts and welfare. They never did a hard day of work.
Denialists are traitors, who should be locked up and/or tortured and executed for committing crimes against the state and crimes against humanity. Hypocritical scum have the nerve to attack the few people who actually TAKE ACTION and change their lifestyles.
@PrairleDogged Fuel poverty is primarily caused by greedy energy suppliers who hiked prices well above the actual rise in fossil fuel price and poor insulation in older homes. Despite this since 2003 those in fuel poverty in the UK dropped by 50% because the govt acted to reduce costs for those who could least afford it.Look up "Winter Fuel Payment", Warm Front and Carbon Emission Reduction Target.
At what level of certainty would you act on AGW or would no amount of evidence convince you?
|Energy Secretary Chris Huhne yesterday committed the UK to a legally binding 50 per cent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 in a move that will leave Britain £13.4billion-a-year worse off. The targets are the toughest of any country in the world and will come at a huge price for Britain’s struggling economy.
In contrast, the U.S. has pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions by only 3 per cent, while China – the world’s biggest polluter – expects its carbon dioxide emissions to rise."
@PrairleDogged You missed this bit of the daily mail quote you used "the UK would need to sacrifice 1 per cent of its gross domestic product to meet the target" 1% is not £500 per household, it's much, much less but i'm sure the mail knows that. p.s. I'm glad to see the UK leading the way on moving to renewables and nuclear, they will be ahead of the game when everyone else is scrabbling around for scraps of expensive fossil fuels. CBI: "We support a 50% emissions reduction target by 2025"
Besides temps there are other predicted aspects of climate change. For example, increasing wind speeds and wave height. Here's an article about a recent study.
Go to any library that has copies of old newspapers. Read up on the climate predictions of 15 to 20 years ago. Then read ALL 65 leaked pages of emails from the Uni of East Anglia which the government claims the scientists were genuine but naive. Then read up on the globalist agenda of population control including HAARP, banking, NLP. dumb down TV & education, food shortages ( next water) wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, Bilderbergers, Davos, social breakdown ect & then join all the dots together.
@ALBIONTYKE 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that 7 papers predicted global cooling. Significantly more papers,42 in total,predicted global warming (Peterson 2008).
The scientists involved were all cleared of any wrongdoing by 5 independent investiagtions which included skeptics on the investigation teams.
I lived in Australia in the early 90s.They said in 20 yrs crocs would be in Brisbane & the canal homes flooded, It never happened. I now live in the UK, they said 15 yrs ago that vineyards would be flourishing in Northern England by now, they said we would see a dramatic increase in cockroaches, Lincolnshire & Norfolk faced serious threats of flooding & farming would have to make serious adoptions as traditional vegetables would be only grown in the few fertile areas of Scotland yet nothing !
@ALBIONTYKE Ryedale (near Malton) in the North of England has a commercial vineyard actually plus several others a and a few going into production in Scotland this year. By "they" did you mean the media or scientific peer reviewed papers? you do understand that newspapers are not a very reliable source of information and are primarily concerned with selling papers with outlandish news stories.
@checkyoursources Vineyards are not flourishing in the north, there have always been a few scattered around. In Roman times vineyards were flourishing in the north as the climate then was much warmer than now. Yes I did mean newspapers, but they were articles written by the scientific community. Try looking up old National Geographic reports, it's amusing. 32,000 people holding science degrees including 9,000 professors derided the peer reviewed reports of only 2,300 govt selected scientists.
@ALBIONTYKE I suggest you look up Northern England vineyards, you will find many! In roman times: . Moberg, D.M. Sonechkin, K. Holmgren, N.M. Datsenko and W. Karlén (2005). , Nature, 443: 613-617 shows that temps were cooler than today globally. So does: P.D. Jones and M.E. Mann (2004). , Reviews of Geophysics, 42: RG2002. You seem to be referring to the Oregon petition, it's laughable and unverifiable, it included the spice girl gerri halliwell on the list as a scientist?! Look it up on wiki.
@checkyoursources Lol 9,000 professors & not one was a spice girl ! All the names you supplied were in the pockets of govt agencies. You need to study hard the political elements as to why many scientists are giving out misleading or completely false information. The biggest man made threat to our climate is HAARP. I originate from the north, these vineyards are small & scattered & as many close down as open. 1,200 yrs ago how did the Vikings grow sustainable crops in Greenland ? Clue Green !
@ALBIONTYKE Then man in charge of the oregon petition said: "When we're getting thousands of signatures there's no way of filtering out a fake", Of the signatories only 200 climate researchers were on the list acording to scientific american. If you want a psychologists or physiologists opinion on global warming then your petition is the place to find it. It is not the opinion of the majority of cliamtologists- See Doran 2009/Anderegg 2010.
@checkyoursources Was it cooler in Greenland 1200 years ago yes or no ? ( Greenland is a classed as a continent like Australia so it a big area of the planet. ) Are you worried about HAARP controlling the climate for the political gain of a few ? Are you concerned that one of the biggest backers of AGW is Nathan Rothschild ?
@ALBIONTYKE 1) Greenland (covering just 0.4% of the Earth's surface) is part of the N. American Plate/Continent so it is NOT a continent. 2) Parts of Greenland may have been warmer or cooler than today but this is irrelevant to whether globally it was warmer or cooler and this too is irrelevant to whether humans are causing the current rise as none of the natural factors that may or may not have caused a warmer/cooler greenland fit the fingerprint of the current warming trend since the 1970's.
@checkyoursources You have not responded to one of my questions. "Parts of it may have been warmer or cooler" is not an answer. The other 2 were completely ignored. Whether its a continent or not is not really relative. It was warmer & they did grow sustainable crops unlike today. The Vikings also made it to what is now south east Canada & NW USA. They called it Vinland because they discovered wild vines, impossible to grow there today due to the harsh winters. Now HAARP & Nathen Rothschild ?
@ALBIONTYKE Why are you focusing on just 0.4% of the planets surface?
My answer is: while the Medieval Warm Period saw unusually warm temperatures in some regions, globally the planet was cooler than current conditions. This has been confirmed by the National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions. On your other conspiracy theorist type questions, they don't need an answer because they are irrelevant, misleading and unrelated to the causes of climate change.
@PrairleDogged Your logic on the MWP is akin to saying that the plague was natural and people died so WW2 deaths where people died was natural too?!
Some peer reviewed links or some data from you for once would be nice. Here are mine showing a cooler global MWP plus a full dataset:1) Northern Hemisphere Temperature Reconstruction by Moberg et al. (2005), J. Esper, E.R. Cook, and F.H. Schweingruber(2002). Science, 295(5563). 2) National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions.
@PrairleDogged regions such as central Eurasia,northwestern North America, and the tropical Pacific were all significantly cooler than the 1961 to 1990 average let alone current temps. See:National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions or any of the papers I just gave you.Secondly of any regions that may have been similar to todays temps, the causes of Medieval warming are not the same as those causing late 20th century warming.Temperature Reconstruction by Moberg et al. (2005)
@PrairleDogged There is more warming than cooling overall so that means global temps on average are rising and humans are the most likely explanation for the majority of the warming since the 1970's.
Warming? how much ? including error margin ? is it worldwide or are there colder areas than normal ? as you have already dismissed the MWP as being a worldwide event because a 7 acre island in the South Pacific was colder than today *o)
@PrairleDogged On the MWP:During the MWP central Eurasia, northwestern North America, and the tropical Pacific were substantially cooler compared to the 1961 to 1990 average-See National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions. Global surface temperature increased by 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) in the 20thC. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade).
@PrairleDogged During the MWP central Eurasia, northwestern North America, and the tropical Pacific were substantially cooler compared to the 1961 to 1990 average-See National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions. Global surface temperature increased by 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) in the 20thC. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade).
Repeating your mistruth will NOT make it any more believable ~ are we to be subjected to your bullshit as it goes around the carousel on a regular basis sharkblubber?
It was BS 1st time around last week and I am sure things have not changed since.
@PrairleDogged Rather than present some disproof of the National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions you choose to attack my honesty. How unscientific. Try again. p.s. The rate of warming over the last half of the 20thC period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade).
Work out those temperatures within their error margins Mark ~ 0.13 ± 0.03 °C = possible 0.1°C then 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C = a possible 0.09 °C therefore within your own stated figures they could be within .01°C hardly an alarming scenario is it ?
Not a great lot of use without the margin of error is it Mark? that little ~ ± makes all the difference as my post to you that you ignored proved. * rolleyes * sigh.
@PrairleDogged i thought you might ask: Margin of Error just ±0.02. Also look up: An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 (Murphy 2009) and Waiting for Cooling (Fawcett & Jones 2008)
Is that ± 0.02 F or C or Kg ! ! ! if you are quoting these fantastic sources how about getting the details right !! As we all know with you warmists the Devil is in the detail.
*
You seem to have dropped the other BS you were referencing that showed the perceived warming could be as little as 0.01°C per decade ? why is that ?
*
I see you have Grasshoppered from degrees per Decade degrees per Century ~ makes the figures more scary ?
@PrairleDogged Seeing as I gave you the figures in °C/century do I really have to explain that the margin of error is in degrees C. You said "You seem to have dropped the other BS you were referencing that showed the perceived warming could be as little as 0.01°C per decade" Where exactly did I say that?
By the way will you discuss the oceans, land and atmosphereic rises or just the atmosphere? Have you read:An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 (Murphy 2009) yet?
@checkyoursources I was not referring to the Medieval warm period. Check yourself when the Medieval period was. You have ignored the Vinland comment also. The crux of the AGW scam is related to my last 2 questions. This is a common pattern amongst pro AGW people. They are not able to think out of the box & see the bigger picture & I assume wont bother to study it either. The corrupt & evil Globalists who really run this planet make it all relative, yet you are helping them destroy our world.
@frithwks At least your capable of independent thought,"gravity" is not a theory "photosynthesis" is not a theory "Newtons laws" are not a theory no matter who performs the they will get the same result absolute.Without doubt the Earths climate and water table have changed .......so what,the same changes could be happening without us,No control model is used,only poloticians are pushing it,sunspots,volcanoes,forest fires,china make climate pediction impossible,clean our waterways instead.
I saw the same kind of stuff back in the 70's and it was a wall of ice coming down from the poles covering the land causing the earth to topple over because the weight of ice "pulled the planet over. The consensus of scientist said that the Glaciers would be down to the Dakotas by the year 2000. Any warmers what to by a bridge? cash only
Scientific facts are to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome.Man made G.W. is a theory.
Hello! I am Miss Teen Earth Gulf Coast, Lauren Nicole Goodman. And I really want to raise an awareness, Please find me on facebook and become a fan! Thank you!
Notice the tricks , We are all now in a warfare type scenario to save the planet , because you will give up your freedoms to fight a war . Watch the media useing the key words over and over Sustainability , carbon foot print , etc , these are your new holy words . Its a soviet technique called psychic driving , you repeat over and over and drive the message into ones brain . There useing old formulas and propoganda to sell the scam of climate change , its all simple stuff if you can think .
Increased CO2 levels is natures way of increasing crop yields to feed the world’s growing population. Ask all them ignorant politicians and scientists why many greenhouse operators use CO2 generators inside greenhouses to increase their plant yield. Politicians believe CO2 is bad is so they can create new carbon taxes, and we all know how well politicians spend our tax money. Scientists believe CO2 is bad is so they can justify their existence and increase their research budget.
The same guy who is warning us about this 'global warming' BS, Al Gore, also warned the kids on an episode of "South Park" that 'man-bear-pig' would surely be the death of us all, but like global warming, it never happened! He also claimed he invented the internet, then gets a Nobel Peace Prize. What a joke!
Mt.St.Helens ALONE produced more 'greenhouse gasses' than mankind has, or ever will.
Let's kill all the evil people! That must surely be the answer! Let's start with leftist morons!!!
Nah, lets just destroy and kill everything and in the same time make some good profit on it all.. I mean, thats why we are here is'nt it? Is'nt that what life is all about?
A valid argument can be made that the environmental movement is racist and has killed more people, mostly those of colour (i.e. black,) than Stalin and Hitler combined killed anybody. The environmental agenda is there to impede the progress of mankind, to kill people and or to prevent them from being alive. Don't beleive their lies. Fight the AGW scam!!!
The "scam" deniers refer to is the disinformation campaign funded by vested corporate interests. They have no credible evidence but you buy it anyway? Why?
Global Warming doesn't just mean we're warming up, it means the current climate patterns will change. Read about one of the many negative effects coming our way.
Google: Report: Developing Nations Need To Diversify Water Supplies
It's time we changed the way we generate and use energy. Join us.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Impacts of climate change in the news...
.
Climate change: Implications of Bonn
. Particularly to the communities of our small low-lying countries where the effects of sea level rise and changing weather patterns are already creating social and economic disruption. All these impacts will affect the very fabric of island livelihoods.
Read big players books that fund the academics , fund the scientists own the media ect . They plant ideas, attitudes, cognitive strategies into you using professional methodology /authority figures , scary stories etc . It pains me to see how indoctrinated most people have become , only a domesticated animal is oblivious to whats realy going on . This global warming is a Scam to control your food water energy everything you need for life . Be very wary people .
Thru the media , hollywood etc scary propoganda is driven into your rip little minds . Notice the repetition or simple repeating of key words, within a sentence . carbon foot print , eco , Sustainability etc . This repetition is a soviet tatic ,they called mantras . . Children and none thinkers are so mesmerized and frightened by the climate monsters , because he or she would be offending the demons of green . They bow and grovel to there cults new bibles words as to a god .
I heard you and would like to report that I'm doing my part. Only two bags of garbage per year to the dump. We burn most of our garbage and the ashes are dumped in the swamp and covered with gravel to make trails. We heat entirely with wood from our 40 acres. The carbon dioxide created helps makes the trees grow, we could use more CO2 as we are in defiicit but we make do. We have a snowplow on the pickup and the SUV with 4 wheel drive gets us to town when the snow is 2 feet deep. We are greenies
Notice the tricks , We are all now in a warfare type scenario to save the planet , because you will give up your freedoms to fight a war . Watch the media useing the key words over and over Sustainability , carbon foot print , etc , thats a soviet technique called psychic driving . Its basicly brainwashing a message into you , thats how you remeber a song hook by repeating it over and over . There useing old old formulas and propoganda to sell the scam of climate change .
@ozzycriss you dont even realize how dumb you are. I learn environment protection at the local university and I know the truth but how can I convince you... I think noone can.
About 10 new gulf Mexico oil leaks in oceans will stop global warming by blocking sun light from heating oceans . Drill baby Drill my Hummer needs mega amounts of gasoline. Lets be real environmental destruction is the price for economic expansion and growth . Now grow up and pay tribute to those that butter your bread. And they are oil corporations , Goldman Sachs doing Gods work, and all the lovely congressmen and senators who vote and legislate you American citizens into gradual oblivion.
More PROPAGANDA. Everyone watch a movie called The Great Global Warming Swindle and research CLIMATE GATE. There are 3 times more Polar Bears then 10 yrs ago and the polar ice caps are not melting they are growing. Also the world is in a cooling cycle not a warming cycle. Its all a SCAM to get you to pay carbon taxes and empowering the corporations to buy carbon credits so they can pollute even more. Ask AL GORE why he never talks about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch? or real issues
A warmer world would disrupt agricultural production, shift the areas suitable for many tree species, and increase the range of pests and pathogens. And while beneficial plants may grow faster with increased carbon dioxide, so do weeds, allergens and invasive species.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Science news
FEDS TO STUDY ANIMAL CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS
-- The U.S. government says it is funding 17 projects to better understand future climate change conditions and their effects on fish and other wildlife.
Officials said the projects include studies of alterations in Florida's ecosystems, potential impacts on Great Lakes fish, sea-level rise impacts on San Francisco Bay marshes, and the effects of melting glaciers on Alaska's freshwater coastal systems.
Rafting, Fishing, Cabins, Outdoor Store Rentals Glacier National Park
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Glacier National Park has lost two more of its glaciers to climate change and many of the rest may be gone by the end of the decade, a US government researcher says.
Warmer temperatures have reduced the number of named glaciers in the northwestern Montana park to 25...
an engineering company in the uk is building clear tubes to hold co2 taken from the atmosphere at 100,000ppm, put on roofs of houses to heat the houses and reflect the heat back in, more cost effective than solar panels.
Omg...hot day = global warming, cold day = global warming, drought = global warming, flood = global warming, snow = global warming, cloudy day = global warming, decrease ice sheet = global warming, increase ice sheet = global warming,
Global warming is the hyped up version of the natural event called El Nino.
El Nino causes all the same things as they say global warming causes, and we have just come out of an El Nino cycle. Causes ice to melt, atmosphere to get warm, more rain & snow. Its all due to tropics air and water being moved due to slowing winds.
A real INCONVENIENT TRUTH to Gore & his Goldman Sachs partners & AGW Cult
Here's a great expose of what the GATT expansion to the WTO (orchestrated by Clinton/Gore) has produced in terms of environmental damage by moving manufacturing in the West that had Environmental laws to pollute with impunity in the Socialists/Limousine Liberals current favorite failed utopia, China
By 2100, at current rates of increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, average ocean pH will drop 0.3 - 0.4 and be @ 7.8 with an increase in acidic H+ ion concentration of 150-200%.
That will cause a 50% DECREASE of ocean carbonate ions (CO3).
Carbonate ions are needed for growth by plankton & corals at the base of the ocean's food chain.
It is a shame to say, that we are doomed!! few will listen,most will ignore in the name of pleasure. our local goverment dont care, why should we? we are killing the earth and there is no stopping it.
Top 10 pollutants: 1. Sulfur dioxide 2. Nitrogen oxides 3. Ammonia 4. Carbon monoxide 5. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 6. Ozone 7. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) 8. Airborne particles 9. Toxic metals 10. Radioactive pollutants Hmmm Co2 isnt even there... probably becasue it ISN'T pollution, since Co2 is required to sustain life on earth! LOL They want to tax Co2, becasue they say its hurting wildlife, what IS hurting wildlife is POLLUTION.
Dr Miskolczi showed that the solution to a differential equation for the greenhouse effect developed in 1922 by Arthur Milne, wrongly assumed an infinitely thick atmosphere. In re-solving this equation a new term and also a new law of physics have been proposed setting an upper limit to the greenhouse effect. Dr Miskolczis theory indicates that any warming from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide will eventually be offset by a change in atmospheric moisture content.
Dr Miskolczi showed that the solution to a differential equation for the greenhouse effect developed in 1922 by Arthur Milne, wrongly assumed an infinitely thick atmosphere. In re-solving this equation a new term and also a new law of physics have been proposed setting an upper limit to the greenhouse effect. Dr Miskolczis theory indicates that any warming from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide will eventually be offset by a change in atmospheric moisture content
Donald Trump is mad so he said Gore should have his Nobel taken from him. Then he said the Chinese think American politicians are the dumbest people in the world because he is a rasist!
poor animals lyke polar bears and penguins they will not survive b/c of human activities we are causing this to happen we are releasing too much carbon dioxide from our cars,power plants and airlplanes and all of that is going into our atmosphere and the temperatures are heating upp and causing everything to melt and we wont survive unless we do something about it
Very enjoyable thank you
bribribri56 1 week ago
some great inforamtion here thanks
willbirful 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
keep telling all we need .fix the world
ahmead9910 2 months ago
keep telling all we need .fix the world
Treeismable 2 months ago
white smoke from those factories is water vapor
leocade7 3 months ago
Seeing as how China is the worlds biggest polluter and the amount of oil that is used to get goods from China to the USA is huge DO NOT BUY THINGS FROM CHINA!!!!
kraigthorne 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HAIKU
"I, so long to be
As I was once, young and free
Unshackled from greed."
—Planet Earth
StephanieLisaTara 4 months ago
Please check out Save Planet Earth by Tokyo Rose. A Rock Anthem about Global Warming and Man's Greed
Tokyorosebiz 4 months ago
Try my channel for 2011 real climate science conference,It's called 6th International conference on climate change held in The US.Scroll down the uploads column,they are in no particular order however the Q&A videos should be watched after the others and do read my description of the video.Enjoy
2wheels88 5 months ago
Fred Bailey has discovered the underlying nataural mechanism that regulates Sunspot production and Climate Change, there is a connection between them but Sunspots have nothing to do with Climate Change, Google solarchords and you will see for yourself
howardsway782 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a quick simple solution to global warming. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on by Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. WE NEED IT NOW. The source is deuterium from the World’s Oceans – virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce."..could cost as little as 0.9c per kilowatt" See blog "the Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post.
website “Star Scientific Limited”
Youtube video – “In the Footsteps of Fusion” + youtube channel
2110kop 6 months ago in playlist global warming
This has been flagged as spam show
A new study in the peer-reviewed science journal "Remote Sensing" has found that United Nations computer models may be incorrect in overstating the amount of global warming that will occur in the future. James M. Taylor says it would be wise for the media, elected officials and climate scientists to recognize the “huge discrepancy” between global warming predictors and NASA’s satellite data.
vechorik 6 months ago in playlist global warming
These denialists hate freedom. Unless they support bombing the military prison that holds patriotic soldier Bradley Manning hostage and freeing him and supporting his and wikileaks' right to free speech, these hypocrite scum support the big-government control of citizens' lives that they have the nerve to accuse environmentalists and climate hawks of supporting.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello I believe that it is you who activists who hate freedom. Why else would you attempt to shove your propaganda down our throats and force us to dump our hard earned cash into Al Gore's pockets, as this so-called climate change action does NOTHING to prevent climate change, as it is a massive hoax. Please recheck your facts and perhaps come up with some better arguments that actually have a hint of truth in them for once. I am sick you activists taking us all for a bunch of naive idiots.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 You are the anti-marxists who put people in prison in American for censoring free speech about Marxism. You are the ones who force your pollution and damaging climate change upon the rest of humanity who does what it can do to conserve.
Clearly, you have no ability to logically calculate the consequences of your actions. That is because you are a stupid conservative. All conservatives are mentally inferior to liberals and radicals. That is a scientific FACT.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello You are the pro-stoneage people who put people in prison in many countrys for making use of modern technology. You are the ones who force your 'lets all be vegetarian stone-agers' propaganda upon humanity who are trying to live life the way God designed it to be.
Clearly, you have no ability to logically calculate the consequences of your actions. That is because you are a stupid alarmist. All alarmists are mentally inferior to skeptics of global warming. That is a scientific FACT.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 And you meat-eaters and anti-environmentalists force BILLIONS of innocent animals (cows, pigs, chickens) each year into the holocaust of factory farms, putting them in crates no larger than their bodies for their entire lives.
But, of course, you shitheads - since you NEVER did a day of work in your lives - REFUSE to acknowledge the hypocrisy of your claims of "loving freedom".
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello And you vegetarians and anti-technology activists force BILLIONS of dollars (from pensioners, single parents, farmers, ect.) each year into the black-hole of Al-Gore's pockets, putting them into vaults no larger than 10x10x2 meters for as long as Al-Gore pleases.
But, of course - since you NEVER did a day of real work in your lives - you REFUSE to acknowledge the hypocrisy of your claims "loving the environment"
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 And you AGW-deniers refuse to admit that you are all holocaust-deniers and Jew-haters, blaming and scapegoating innocent people (environmentalists, vegans, Jews, hippies) who have NOTHING to do with the current destruction of the world economy and ecology. You worship at the anus of Alex Jones like he's some sort of "god".
You are an embarrassment to 911truthers, who (on the issue of 911) at least have some respectability.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello The very fact that you put the words AGW and Holocaust into one sentence clearly indicates that you are desperate to spread your propaganda that CO2 is a pollutant. I do not really consider myself an AWG denier since there is no need for me to deny it because it is simply a figure of your (and Al-Gore's) imagination. I have nothing against environmentalists (the ones who actually give a damn about the environment) and Jews, although I do question vegans and hippies sometimes.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 If you love freedom, then blow up all the prisons and let out all the prisoners.
Until then, STFU.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello If you love freedom, then stop trying to force your unscientific claims of doom and destruction down our throats.
Until then, I rest my case.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 And if you love freedom, then stop forcing your pollution and climate change upon others.
Done. I win.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello It is becoming apparent that you are running out of scientific arguments to back up your view. So far, all that you have said are just accusations towards me that you have assumed.
Firstly, like I have already said, I do not force pollution on others. As you may or may not realise, Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant and is actually beneficial to the environment.
Also, Climate Change is not caused my Man and is only a harmless cycle that the earth goes through. Check your history.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@mphello Please come up with some realistic scientific claims if you wish to have a chance at convincing anyone of your little scam. But why would you waste your life trying to scare people about nothing real anyway? There are better things to do. I find it amusing, but also sad how someone can latch onto a belief that does not have a µBit of scientific fact to back it up and try to force this belief on other innocent people. Personally, I would recommend that you take a trip to the psychiatrist
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 It is time for the AGW proponents to fight back
against the flood of AGW-denying propaganda that infiltrates
the airwaves and internet and cable tv.
We need our viewpoint heard and acted on,
the way the denialists have been coddled
and have had politicians bending over backwards for them for centuries.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello How do you expect to fight back at our propaganda when we have none? You are just wasting your time. We fight lies and scams with the truth, and we want to give people the unbiased evidence and real facts, so that they can make their own choice. Whilst, you fight with just biased and altered facts that are designed to make people believe what you want them to believe. In the end, it is the people who determine who wins. Why not take a break from deceiving people and perhaps get a life.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 There is no point, because you fanatic extremist AGW-denier anti-vegans refuse to look at any proof and evidence put before you.
mphello 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Recyclojunk64 Check out these organizations that debunk the global-warming-denying crazies.
Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Brazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academié des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
mphello 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64
The Anthropogenic Global Warming AGW denialist = Holocaust denier
= Evolution denier nutjobs NEVER mention the loss of jobs to those
who want to work in the solar and wind field,
but these are not coddled and pampered the way the coal, oil,
nuclear industries have been coddled by politicians,
esp in the US, for over 200 years (starting with coal, obviously).
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello It is becoming apparent that you may have been brainwashed by Al-Gore and the effects of it are most likely taking their toll on your thinking ability. You have still failed to even give me even one µBit of unbiased scientific information even though I have reminded you to several times. But rather, you are just using the CAPS LOCK key in a desperate effort to make us believe your 'facts'. I am amused by your lack of originality, and insulted that you expect to fool me with these lies.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 Forget trying to convince AGW-deniers. They are fanatic extremists with a severe sexually-confused
homoerotic complex for Al Gore, but they are ashamed to say it.
So, in their sexual frustration and confusion, they lash out constantly at Al Gore,
who won't satisfy them, and make homophobic hate-filled outbursts.
mphello 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Recyclojunk64 Check out these organizations that debunk the global-warming-denying crazies:
US National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service
The National Academy of Engineering
The Institute of Medicine
UK Natural Environment Research
Council Office of Science and Technology Policy
Council on Environmental Quality National Economic Council
mphello 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Recyclojunk64 Check out these organizations that debunk the global-warming-denying crazies:
US National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service
The National Academy of Engineering
The Institute of Medicine
UK Natural Environment Research
Council Office of Science and Technology Policy
Council on Environmental Quality National Economic Council
mphello 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Recyclojunk64 Check out these organizations that debunk the global-warming-denying crazies.
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
mphello 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 AGW-deniers are so discredited these days. They still think the moon-landing was staged,
and that Al Gore either invented or caused the Holocaust.
They think vaccines contain nanobots that control people's minds that turn them gay.AGW-denialism all began with Alex Jones, who thinks 911 was a hologram.
Many AGW-deniers even lie about their USA citizenship, many coming here illegally.
AGW-deniers make millions off their oil-coal connections with the Taliban.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello BTW, I love freedom, and that is why I use only GNU/Linux and other Free Software and I hate it when someone trys to remove my freedom by force. That's why I hate Microsoft and Apple, Adobe, Sony... I would also love to see Bradley Manning released and the governments stop censoring free speech.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@Recyclojunk64 Freedom only for yourself, of course. Or the virtual world.
Or those (like Manning) who don't have any immediate direct effect on your life.
But, when it is YOU who is the oppressor or unfairly negatively affecting others and thereby reducing THEIR freedom to survive and live well (by pollution, by global warming), then you're up in arms.
Freedom WITH RESPONSIBILITY.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello Let me get this straight, I never said anything about pollution. I believe that we should not be polluting the environment, (whether it be litter, toxic chemicals, smog, or any other pollutant) for many reasons. Please do not assume that I have no respect for the environment just because I do not believe in the Global Warming hoax. I can see what you mean by negatively affecting others, if it were true that man-made CO2 causes global warming, but fortunately, it does not.
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
@mphello Please recheck your sources of info. I understand how easy it can be to believe what everyone else says, but remember that just because a belief is mainstream or promoted by some of the worlds 'greatest' scientists, it does not mean that it is true. Remember the Y2K hoax? Everyone wasted money replacing electronic devices since they supposedly would not work in the next millennia. It was just a hoax, but many people were fooled. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
Recyclojunk64 6 months ago
What a shithead: believes some HAARP conspiracies, made-up fairytales created on the internet. But he denies the proven FACT of anthropogenic global warming, proven by THOUSANDS of lines of evidence, published in peer-reviewed journals.
mphello 6 months ago
Come on, earthactivist: DELETE all the denialist crap on your channel.
I do on all of MY YT channels.
mphello 6 months ago
Global-warming denialists = Holocaust denialists.
Blah blah blah Al Gore blah blah Al Gore blah blah Al Gore controls the world.
Al Gore gave me herpes. Al Gore wants to destroy the world.
(sound familiar? Replace "Al Gore" with "Jews")
mphello 6 months ago
This global cooling is indeed an environmental disaster of epic proportions.
patioperson 8 months ago
This posted video, “40 Years in 3 Minutes” takes a hard look at an environmental disaster towards the end, while synched to the beat of The Beatles’ GLASS ONION”.
keetongeer 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The last decade was the hottest on modern record. - WMO
The benefits of a price on carbon outweigh the costs several times over. -Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
The warming trend over 1970 to 2001 is greater than warming from both 1860 to 1880 and 1910 to 1940. GISS/ NOAA
checkyoursources 8 months ago
We've seen the environment like this for hundreds of years.
Don't let some newly born, like from the '90s, just yesterday, try to scam you because he blows dope and listens to Al Gore and the other alarmists.
Nothing new in the climate today, nothing new in the last thousand years or more.
Just the same old climate, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, droughts, and assholes who think this is new.
patioperson 8 months ago
Checkyourshorts, what does the plant food carbon dioxide have to do with this global cooling?
I'm glad to see Canada leading the way with Harper calling Kyoto a disaster and global warming a lie.
Those aren't the exact words, but this globull worming bullshit isn't infecting the minds of the Canadian people.
The scam is over, pack your bags, especially with long underwear and parkas 'cause it's getting cold fast.
patioperson 8 months ago 2
"Perhaps because of its historic use of windmills, the Netherlands has invested heavily in modern wind power. It is now third in the world in offshore wind power generation - of course heavily subsidized by the government. But the new center-right government has decided that continuing the massive subsidies, which include the transfer of 4.5 billion Euros of Dutch tax dollars to a German engineering company to build and run new wind farms, is not, shall we say, defensible."
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
....cont
"The new Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, may have come up with the perfect epitaph for wind power. He reputedly said, "Windmills turn on subsidies." Soon fewer will be turning."
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
"The John Muir Trust - a "conservation charity," please note - commissioned an engineering study of wind power in the UK. The report is out, and it is revealing. While wind power farms are pitched to investors - really, lawmakers, since wind power only exists because of lavish subsidies from government - as generating, on average, 30% of their maximum output over time, in reality they average only 25%. So wind power delivers about one-sixth less electricity than promised."
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
"Organized Crime in Charge of EU Carbon Trade, Europol Says"
/watch?v=oL-e33oaI94&feature=channel_video_title
CRAPCANNONS 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The science is settled on carbon polution,Please watch this - Lord Christopher Monckton Speaking in St. Paul just copy and paste it in search box.
2wheels88 9 months ago
Global Warming... I bet this count more than a cow farts... try search:
How many nuclear tests have been done ಠ_ಠ
ravenwolfs 9 months ago
Wind turbines are killing many thousands of bats contributing to a population decline that may be costing farmers millions, say researchers. Scientists found the blades of wind turbines were a major threat to bats particularly when they are migrating.
Bats are useful to farmers because they eat large numbers of crop damaging insects, reducing the amount of pesticides.
Writing in the journal Science, the researchers estimated that bats could be worth billions to agriculture around the world.
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged 1) More bats are killed by carsand habitat loss than turbines. 2) A new device is being developed using ultrasound which can be fitted to turbines that allows bats to avoid being hit and University of Aberdeen group recently suggested radar emissions might act as a "bat-scarer".3) If these were added, and turbines were sited at sea or in carefully selected areas then what is your issue with wind turbines?
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Are you stupid ? so there is a toll for birds and bats by cars etc ~ so hey lets add to it? that seems to make sense ( NOT )
ps ~ i did not do the study, it was scientifically conducted so i thought it would satisfy your fussy criteria 8-}
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged Nope, I was making the point that you don't criticise cars or habitat loss but do criticise non fossil fuel energy sources. In addition if tech was used to protect the bats then what is your issue with wind power over fossil fuels?
Read the following which describes the effects of fossil fuel pollution on wildlife: Effects of industrial air pollution on wildlife .James R. Newman 1979
Air pollution and wildlife toxicology: An overlooked problem - 1988
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Turbines at sea ??? yes a great idea ~ nobody can see the carnage below them as the tide washes away the corpses daily ~ it will be a matter of time before some unfortunate mariners die amongst the turbine towers but then you green gimps will say the storm that drove the ship there was due to AGW.
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
@PrairleDogged The environmental impact of wind turbines is significantly less than fossil fuels.
checkyoursources 8 months ago
@checkyoursources
Unless you are a Bird or a Bat or are sensitive to low frequency noise pollution, or blind to their fuck ugly presence ~ jog on o blinkered one.
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
@PrairleDogged Ok, well you won't mind if we put a coal power station in your backyard then will you?
By the way I already have a turbine, it makes me money to spend on wildlife conservation and I like it.
checkyoursources 8 months ago
@checkyoursources
"The feed-in tariff mechanism is fast becoming a scandal. Those lucky enough to own buildings large enough on which to install solar panels or enough land for a wind farm have been receiving 30-40p per kwh, for electricity, which is retailed at only 11p."
...cont
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
....cont
" The loss is paid for by a levy on businesses and households. It is astonishing that the Liberals who attach such importance to fairness turn a blind eye to this transfer from poor to rich running to œbillions a year. If you live in a council tower block in Lambeth you don't have much opportunity to get your nose into this trough."
Yes checkyoursources i bet you do have a turbine cash converter ~ there is always a reason for you do gooders to be pushing the hype ~ follow the money.
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
@PrairleDogged Wow, you sound jealous that I no longer worry as much about oil prices as much you need to, you should get yourself a wind turbine too. I can give advice on where to get a good one. Are you unaware of the subsidies that oil companies get?
What do you have against subsidies going to wind power when it reduces reliance of imported fossil fuels, air pollution and encourages people to use energy more wisely?
The UK has three times the current wind energy needs of the nation.
checkyoursources 8 months ago
@checkyoursources
Jealous? stealing money via subsidies off people who can least afford it to satisfy some crackpot theory is not something any rational person would be jealous of.
Just listen to your crap " encourages people to use energy more wisely"
Seeing as you like to check things out Google 'UK fuel poverty' and see the results of your foolish greed on the elderly ~ scared to put their heating on whilst you rake in a subsidy on their fuel costs.
I pity you.
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
...
Thanet wind farm recently opened amidst green hoorays
"Over the coming years we will be giving the wind farm's Swedish owners a total of £1.2 billion in subsidies. That same sum, invested now in a single nuclear power station, could yield a staggering 13 times more electricity, with much greater reliability."
"Fuel Poverty and Cold Will Kill More Elderly People in the UK This Winter"
Robin Hood in reverse = the green in man.
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
@PrairleDogged While you criticise small wind power subsidies which help reduce the 2 million deaths worldwide from air pollution you ignore the money being pumped by subsidies into fossil fuels?! In 2009 alone developing countries spent $312bn subsidising coal oil, gas and coal!
p.s. I am not against nuclear power, but it is yet another example of a temporary fix just like oil.
Lord Stern estimated climate damages from fossil fuels of between 5 and 20% of GDP-BBC
checkyoursources 8 months ago
@checkyoursources
£1.2 BILLION for one farm small?
Thank you for confirming that the lives of the sick and vulnerable are worth less than your getting a premium for your excess energy ~ you are no better than the Oil Sheiks you castigate for screwing the energy market ~ sleep well do you?
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
@PrairleDogged Sorry maybe you didn't read my comment : $312bn subsidising coal oil, gas and coal (that's just in developing countries, imagine how big it is developed countries!) vs £1.2 billion for wind, which is a greater number?
How do you sleep knowing you are promoting fossil fuels which kill 2 million prematurely every year through air pollution and fossil fuel prices will rise causing even more damage!
There are $5 of subsidies given to fossil fuels for every $1 for renewables- IEA
checkyoursources 8 months ago
@checkyoursources Denialists do not have the mental capacity to do math.
That's because AGW-denialists, like all conservatives, get all their money handed to them from government bailouts and welfare. They never did a hard day of work.
Denialists are traitors, who should be locked up and/or tortured and executed for committing crimes against the state and crimes against humanity. Hypocritical scum have the nerve to attack the few people who actually TAKE ACTION and change their lifestyles.
mphello 6 months ago
@PrairleDogged Fuel poverty is primarily caused by greedy energy suppliers who hiked prices well above the actual rise in fossil fuel price and poor insulation in older homes. Despite this since 2003 those in fuel poverty in the UK dropped by 50% because the govt acted to reduce costs for those who could least afford it.Look up "Winter Fuel Payment", Warm Front and Carbon Emission Reduction Target.
At what level of certainty would you act on AGW or would no amount of evidence convince you?
checkyoursources 8 months ago
|Energy Secretary Chris Huhne yesterday committed the UK to a legally binding 50 per cent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 in a move that will leave Britain £13.4billion-a-year worse off. The targets are the toughest of any country in the world and will come at a huge price for Britain’s struggling economy.
In contrast, the U.S. has pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions by only 3 per cent, while China – the world’s biggest polluter – expects its carbon dioxide emissions to rise."
PrairleDogged 8 months ago
@PrairleDogged You missed this bit of the daily mail quote you used "the UK would need to sacrifice 1 per cent of its gross domestic product to meet the target" 1% is not £500 per household, it's much, much less but i'm sure the mail knows that. p.s. I'm glad to see the UK leading the way on moving to renewables and nuclear, they will be ahead of the game when everyone else is scrabbling around for scraps of expensive fossil fuels. CBI: "We support a 50% emissions reduction target by 2025"
checkyoursources 8 months ago
Besides temps there are other predicted aspects of climate change. For example, increasing wind speeds and wave height. Here's an article about a recent study.
Google: Study finds wind speeds on the rise
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
More on this topic at "overconsumpulation".
checkyoursources 10 months ago
Go to any library that has copies of old newspapers. Read up on the climate predictions of 15 to 20 years ago. Then read ALL 65 leaked pages of emails from the Uni of East Anglia which the government claims the scientists were genuine but naive. Then read up on the globalist agenda of population control including HAARP, banking, NLP. dumb down TV & education, food shortages ( next water) wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, Bilderbergers, Davos, social breakdown ect & then join all the dots together.
ALBIONTYKE 11 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that 7 papers predicted global cooling. Significantly more papers,42 in total,predicted global warming (Peterson 2008).
The scientists involved were all cleared of any wrongdoing by 5 independent investiagtions which included skeptics on the investigation teams.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
I lived in Australia in the early 90s.They said in 20 yrs crocs would be in Brisbane & the canal homes flooded, It never happened. I now live in the UK, they said 15 yrs ago that vineyards would be flourishing in Northern England by now, they said we would see a dramatic increase in cockroaches, Lincolnshire & Norfolk faced serious threats of flooding & farming would have to make serious adoptions as traditional vegetables would be only grown in the few fertile areas of Scotland yet nothing !
ALBIONTYKE 11 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE Ryedale (near Malton) in the North of England has a commercial vineyard actually plus several others a and a few going into production in Scotland this year. By "they" did you mean the media or scientific peer reviewed papers? you do understand that newspapers are not a very reliable source of information and are primarily concerned with selling papers with outlandish news stories.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Vineyards are not flourishing in the north, there have always been a few scattered around. In Roman times vineyards were flourishing in the north as the climate then was much warmer than now. Yes I did mean newspapers, but they were articles written by the scientific community. Try looking up old National Geographic reports, it's amusing. 32,000 people holding science degrees including 9,000 professors derided the peer reviewed reports of only 2,300 govt selected scientists.
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE I suggest you look up Northern England vineyards, you will find many! In roman times: . Moberg, D.M. Sonechkin, K. Holmgren, N.M. Datsenko and W. Karlén (2005). , Nature, 443: 613-617 shows that temps were cooler than today globally. So does: P.D. Jones and M.E. Mann (2004). , Reviews of Geophysics, 42: RG2002. You seem to be referring to the Oregon petition, it's laughable and unverifiable, it included the spice girl gerri halliwell on the list as a scientist?! Look it up on wiki.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Lol 9,000 professors & not one was a spice girl ! All the names you supplied were in the pockets of govt agencies. You need to study hard the political elements as to why many scientists are giving out misleading or completely false information. The biggest man made threat to our climate is HAARP. I originate from the north, these vineyards are small & scattered & as many close down as open. 1,200 yrs ago how did the Vikings grow sustainable crops in Greenland ? Clue Green !
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE Then man in charge of the oregon petition said: "When we're getting thousands of signatures there's no way of filtering out a fake", Of the signatories only 200 climate researchers were on the list acording to scientific american. If you want a psychologists or physiologists opinion on global warming then your petition is the place to find it. It is not the opinion of the majority of cliamtologists- See Doran 2009/Anderegg 2010.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Was it cooler in Greenland 1200 years ago yes or no ? ( Greenland is a classed as a continent like Australia so it a big area of the planet. ) Are you worried about HAARP controlling the climate for the political gain of a few ? Are you concerned that one of the biggest backers of AGW is Nathan Rothschild ?
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE 1) Greenland (covering just 0.4% of the Earth's surface) is part of the N. American Plate/Continent so it is NOT a continent. 2) Parts of Greenland may have been warmer or cooler than today but this is irrelevant to whether globally it was warmer or cooler and this too is irrelevant to whether humans are causing the current rise as none of the natural factors that may or may not have caused a warmer/cooler greenland fit the fingerprint of the current warming trend since the 1970's.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources You have not responded to one of my questions. "Parts of it may have been warmer or cooler" is not an answer. The other 2 were completely ignored. Whether its a continent or not is not really relative. It was warmer & they did grow sustainable crops unlike today. The Vikings also made it to what is now south east Canada & NW USA. They called it Vinland because they discovered wild vines, impossible to grow there today due to the harsh winters. Now HAARP & Nathen Rothschild ?
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE meant NE USA
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE Why are you focusing on just 0.4% of the planets surface?
My answer is: while the Medieval Warm Period saw unusually warm temperatures in some regions, globally the planet was cooler than current conditions. This has been confirmed by the National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions. On your other conspiracy theorist type questions, they don't need an answer because they are irrelevant, misleading and unrelated to the causes of climate change.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Well your sources have failed you once again, as you are well aware the MWP was global as the mountains of empirical evidence show.
New Zealand, Antarctica, Russia, China, Africa etc etc is hardly 0.4% of the planets surface.
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged Your logic on the MWP is akin to saying that the plague was natural and people died so WW2 deaths where people died was natural too?!
Some peer reviewed links or some data from you for once would be nice. Here are mine showing a cooler global MWP plus a full dataset:1) Northern Hemisphere Temperature Reconstruction by Moberg et al. (2005), J. Esper, E.R. Cook, and F.H. Schweingruber(2002). Science, 295(5563). 2) National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Your stupid analogies AGAIN tool !!! + faulty logic thrown in for good measure.
Once again i throw down the challenge ~ where in the world did the MWP NOT show ? your choice ~
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged regions such as central Eurasia,northwestern North America, and the tropical Pacific were all significantly cooler than the 1961 to 1990 average let alone current temps. See:National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions or any of the papers I just gave you.Secondly of any regions that may have been similar to todays temps, the causes of Medieval warming are not the same as those causing late 20th century warming.Temperature Reconstruction by Moberg et al. (2005)
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
You forgot that little 3 Acre island off the coast of North Africa dingbat and you took the piss out of that guy earlier 0.4% was it?
Q ~ is the WHOLE planet showing this imaginary warming at the present? or some areas warm and others a little chiller?
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged There is more warming than cooling overall so that means global temps on average are rising and humans are the most likely explanation for the majority of the warming since the 1970's.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Warming? how much ? including error margin ? is it worldwide or are there colder areas than normal ? as you have already dismissed the MWP as being a worldwide event because a 7 acre island in the South Pacific was colder than today *o)
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged On the MWP:During the MWP central Eurasia, northwestern North America, and the tropical Pacific were substantially cooler compared to the 1961 to 1990 average-See National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions. Global surface temperature increased by 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) in the 20thC. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade).
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Lifted from a leftwing blogsite you will have to get better than that Mark ~ very woolly.
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged Who is mark? Exactly which part of the comment do you disagree with? Or are you just making accusations?
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@SharkBlubber
*o)
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged During the MWP central Eurasia, northwestern North America, and the tropical Pacific were substantially cooler compared to the 1961 to 1990 average-See National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions. Global surface temperature increased by 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) in the 20thC. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade).
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Repeating your mistruth will NOT make it any more believable ~ are we to be subjected to your bullshit as it goes around the carousel on a regular basis sharkblubber?
It was BS 1st time around last week and I am sure things have not changed since.
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged Rather than present some disproof of the National Academy of Sciences Report on Climate Reconstructions you choose to attack my honesty. How unscientific. Try again. p.s. The rate of warming over the last half of the 20thC period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade).
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Work out those temperatures within their error margins Mark ~ 0.13 ± 0.03 °C = possible 0.1°C then 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C = a possible 0.09 °C therefore within your own stated figures they could be within .01°C hardly an alarming scenario is it ?
p.s
Why don't you post as sharkblubber anymore?
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged sharkkblubber? you called me mark earlier too?
1980–1989 0.176 °C (0.317 °F) above 1951–1980 mean
went up 0.137 to
1990–1999 0.313 °C (0.563 °F) above 1951–1980 mean
went up by 0.2 to
2000–2009 0.513 °C (0.923 °F) above 1951–1980 mean
Data from NASA.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Not a great lot of use without the margin of error is it Mark? that little ~ ± makes all the difference as my post to you that you ignored proved. * rolleyes * sigh.
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged i thought you might ask: Margin of Error just ±0.02. Also look up: An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 (Murphy 2009) and Waiting for Cooling (Fawcett & Jones 2008)
Hadley shows1.9°C/century for 1975-2005
Giss 1.82°C/century for 1975-2005
NOAA 1.87°C/century for 1975-2005
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources
Is that ± 0.02 F or C or Kg ! ! ! if you are quoting these fantastic sources how about getting the details right !! As we all know with you warmists the Devil is in the detail.
*
You seem to have dropped the other BS you were referencing that showed the perceived warming could be as little as 0.01°C per decade ? why is that ?
*
I see you have Grasshoppered from degrees per Decade degrees per Century ~ makes the figures more scary ?
*
Nice soft~shoe shuffle Comrade 8-)
PrairleDogged 10 months ago
@PrairleDogged Seeing as I gave you the figures in °C/century do I really have to explain that the margin of error is in degrees C. You said "You seem to have dropped the other BS you were referencing that showed the perceived warming could be as little as 0.01°C per decade" Where exactly did I say that?
By the way will you discuss the oceans, land and atmosphereic rises or just the atmosphere? Have you read:An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 (Murphy 2009) yet?
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources I was not referring to the Medieval warm period. Check yourself when the Medieval period was. You have ignored the Vinland comment also. The crux of the AGW scam is related to my last 2 questions. This is a common pattern amongst pro AGW people. They are not able to think out of the box & see the bigger picture & I assume wont bother to study it either. The corrupt & evil Globalists who really run this planet make it all relative, yet you are helping them destroy our world.
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE Are we discussing climate change or your progressively more loony conspiracy theories?
Nathan Rothschild is a major shareholder in one of the largest coal producers in the world, explain why he would jeopardise that?
As for your HAARP question, It's so scientifically laughable, it doesnt deserve an answer.
Lets get back to climate cahnge and the most likely current driver shall we?
checkyoursources 10 months ago
@checkyoursources Yet you guys were exalting him till he bought that coal mine in Russia. As for your other comments, I rest my case.
ALBIONTYKE 10 months ago
@ALBIONTYKE "you guys were exalting him"? You mentioned him, not me.
bye bye mr conspiracy theorist. p.s. the only case you should rest is your nutcase views.
checkyoursources 10 months ago
AL GORE and his RADIOACTIVE HORSE
The REAL SCAM concerning AGW.
watch?v=wBfMT3q6n9A
TheElasticJesus 11 months ago
@TheElasticAnus
Still floggin yer dead horse Mark you sad cunt?
PrairleDogged 11 months ago
@frithwks At least your capable of independent thought,"gravity" is not a theory "photosynthesis" is not a theory "Newtons laws" are not a theory no matter who performs the they will get the same result absolute.Without doubt the Earths climate and water table have changed .......so what,the same changes could be happening without us,No control model is used,only poloticians are pushing it,sunspots,volcanoes,forest fires,china make climate pediction impossible,clean our waterways instead.
davetileguy 11 months ago
Lousy theory started by Al Gore & othere leftists. Ted Danson warned us of just the opposite in the '80s & it never happened either!
Im4allguns 1 year ago
I saw the same kind of stuff back in the 70's and it was a wall of ice coming down from the poles covering the land causing the earth to topple over because the weight of ice "pulled the planet over. The consensus of scientist said that the Glaciers would be down to the Dakotas by the year 2000. Any warmers what to by a bridge? cash only
cupera1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cupera1
"The consensus of scientist said that the Glaciers would be down to the Dakotas by the year 2000. Any warmers what to by a bridge? cash only"
"I saw the same kind of stuff back in the 70's ..."
LOL again you weirdo
there was no "consensus of scientist" of a coming ice age. Thats the problem with you guys watching too much TV.
here is a good video on that issue called "In the 70s, They said there'd be an Ice Age": (lol..) /watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
aerobique 1 year ago
Scientific facts are to be independent of the observer: no matter who performs a scientific experiment, all observers will agree on the outcome.Man made G.W. is a theory.
davetileguy 1 year ago 2
Hello! I am Miss Teen Earth Gulf Coast, Lauren Nicole Goodman. And I really want to raise an awareness, Please find me on facebook and become a fan! Thank you!
whattaDANCER911 1 year ago
Good news everybody! Global Warming is a fraud. The little Animals will be safe. Watch this documentary on blip.tv. Climategate blip.tv/file/2946690/
FightTheNWOtv 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Notice the tricks , We are all now in a warfare type scenario to save the planet , because you will give up your freedoms to fight a war . Watch the media useing the key words over and over Sustainability , carbon foot print , etc , these are your new holy words . Its a soviet technique called psychic driving , you repeat over and over and drive the message into ones brain . There useing old formulas and propoganda to sell the scam of climate change , its all simple stuff if you can think .
ozzycriss 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want to see something interesting about Global Warming and James Cameron, watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=TKZ4RolQxec
noteviljustwrong 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Increased CO2 levels is natures way of increasing crop yields to feed the world’s growing population. Ask all them ignorant politicians and scientists why many greenhouse operators use CO2 generators inside greenhouses to increase their plant yield. Politicians believe CO2 is bad is so they can create new carbon taxes, and we all know how well politicians spend our tax money. Scientists believe CO2 is bad is so they can justify their existence and increase their research budget.
sarahpaylin 1 year ago
STUPID IS... AS STUPID DOES [ SAYS ]
GLOBAL Means... WORLD WIDE...! The EARTH is Covered with 73% Water... Where are the TEMERATURE MONITORING Stations WORLDWIDE...?
Where is the LONG TERM temp Data...? And the SOLAR PROMININCES... that Heat the Earth... from the SUN... that NO ONE has control Over...?
ROGER459 1 year ago
The same guy who is warning us about this 'global warming' BS, Al Gore, also warned the kids on an episode of "South Park" that 'man-bear-pig' would surely be the death of us all, but like global warming, it never happened! He also claimed he invented the internet, then gets a Nobel Peace Prize. What a joke!
Mt.St.Helens ALONE produced more 'greenhouse gasses' than mankind has, or ever will.
Let's kill all the evil people! That must surely be the answer! Let's start with leftist morons!!!
Im4allguns 1 year ago
Nah, lets just destroy and kill everything and in the same time make some good profit on it all.. I mean, thats why we are here is'nt it? Is'nt that what life is all about?
kaxitaksi 1 year ago
have you seen "overpopulation is NOT a myth?"
checkyoursources 1 year ago
man that was soooo intense
WhiteGangster400 1 year ago
A valid argument can be made that the environmental movement is racist and has killed more people, mostly those of colour (i.e. black,) than Stalin and Hitler combined killed anybody. The environmental agenda is there to impede the progress of mankind, to kill people and or to prevent them from being alive. Don't beleive their lies. Fight the AGW scam!!!
harbar3000 1 year ago
@harbar3000 .
.
The "scam" deniers refer to is the disinformation campaign funded by vested corporate interests. They have no credible evidence but you buy it anyway? Why?
Global Warming doesn't just mean we're warming up, it means the current climate patterns will change. Read about one of the many negative effects coming our way.
Google: Report: Developing Nations Need To Diversify Water Supplies
It's time we changed the way we generate and use energy. Join us.
UCSUSA(dot)org
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Impacts of climate change in the news...
.
Climate change: Implications of Bonn
. Particularly to the communities of our small low-lying countries where the effects of sea level rise and changing weather patterns are already creating social and economic disruption. All these impacts will affect the very fabric of island livelihoods.
.
Islands Business Fiji
Opinion
12 August 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Read big players books that fund the academics , fund the scientists own the media ect . They plant ideas, attitudes, cognitive strategies into you using professional methodology /authority figures , scary stories etc . It pains me to see how indoctrinated most people have become , only a domesticated animal is oblivious to whats realy going on . This global warming is a Scam to control your food water energy everything you need for life . Be very wary people .
ozzycriss 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thru the media , hollywood etc scary propoganda is driven into your rip little minds . Notice the repetition or simple repeating of key words, within a sentence . carbon foot print , eco , Sustainability etc . This repetition is a soviet tatic ,they called mantras . . Children and none thinkers are so mesmerized and frightened by the climate monsters , because he or she would be offending the demons of green . They bow and grovel to there cults new bibles words as to a god .
ozzycriss 1 year ago
I heard you and would like to report that I'm doing my part. Only two bags of garbage per year to the dump. We burn most of our garbage and the ashes are dumped in the swamp and covered with gravel to make trails. We heat entirely with wood from our 40 acres. The carbon dioxide created helps makes the trees grow, we could use more CO2 as we are in defiicit but we make do. We have a snowplow on the pickup and the SUV with 4 wheel drive gets us to town when the snow is 2 feet deep. We are greenies
patioperson 1 year ago
Notice the tricks , We are all now in a warfare type scenario to save the planet , because you will give up your freedoms to fight a war . Watch the media useing the key words over and over Sustainability , carbon foot print , etc , thats a soviet technique called psychic driving . Its basicly brainwashing a message into you , thats how you remeber a song hook by repeating it over and over . There useing old old formulas and propoganda to sell the scam of climate change .
ozzycriss 1 year ago
@ozzycriss you dont even realize how dumb you are. I learn environment protection at the local university and I know the truth but how can I convince you... I think noone can.
ultimateinvito 1 year ago
About 10 new gulf Mexico oil leaks in oceans will stop global warming by blocking sun light from heating oceans . Drill baby Drill my Hummer needs mega amounts of gasoline. Lets be real environmental destruction is the price for economic expansion and growth . Now grow up and pay tribute to those that butter your bread. And they are oil corporations , Goldman Sachs doing Gods work, and all the lovely congressmen and senators who vote and legislate you American citizens into gradual oblivion.
jobedied 1 year ago
Interesting short clip ! A little music video clip about ignorant people . environmental pollution..... , you can see in my channel .
Thank you
Mark
MySecretIsland 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GLOBAL WARMING IS AN IMPORTANT ISSUE. please help me with my commercial to raise awareness on global warming..
youtube.com/watch?v=JFR0y-bgMNM
swazzie95 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
More PROPAGANDA. Everyone watch a movie called The Great Global Warming Swindle and research CLIMATE GATE. There are 3 times more Polar Bears then 10 yrs ago and the polar ice caps are not melting they are growing. Also the world is in a cooling cycle not a warming cycle. Its all a SCAM to get you to pay carbon taxes and empowering the corporations to buy carbon credits so they can pollute even more. Ask AL GORE why he never talks about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch? or real issues
ArkDiscoverydotCOM 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A warmer world would disrupt agricultural production, shift the areas suitable for many tree species, and increase the range of pests and pathogens. And while beneficial plants may grow faster with increased carbon dioxide, so do weeds, allergens and invasive species.
MarkNobes 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Science news
FEDS TO STUDY ANIMAL CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS
-- The U.S. government says it is funding 17 projects to better understand future climate change conditions and their effects on fish and other wildlife.
Officials said the projects include studies of alterations in Florida's ecosystems, potential impacts on Great Lakes fish, sea-level rise impacts on San Francisco Bay marshes, and the effects of melting glaciers on Alaska's freshwater coastal systems.
UPI
RESTON, VIRGINIA
March 30, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Climate news...
GLACIERS GONE FROM GLACIER NATIONAL PARK
MATTHEW BROWN
April 8, 2010 - 9:59AM
Ads by Google
Glacier Outdoor Center
Rafting, Fishing, Cabins, Outdoor Store Rentals Glacier National Park
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Glacier National Park has lost two more of its glaciers to climate change and many of the rest may be gone by the end of the decade, a US government researcher says.
Warmer temperatures have reduced the number of named glaciers in the northwestern Montana park to 25...
Nightversionn 1 year ago
PEOPLE, we must stop breathing so much or mars will melt.
suicidalbunny1500 1 year ago
al gore is investing in -
an engineering company in the uk is building clear tubes to hold co2 taken from the atmosphere at 100,000ppm, put on roofs of houses to heat the houses and reflect the heat back in, more cost effective than solar panels.
laurelbush 1 year ago
Omg...hot day = global warming, cold day = global warming, drought = global warming, flood = global warming, snow = global warming, cloudy day = global warming, decrease ice sheet = global warming, increase ice sheet = global warming,
Ian7570 1 year ago
@Ian7570 i know, right?
ronny4ever123 1 year ago
Global warming is the hyped up version of the natural event called El Nino.
El Nino causes all the same things as they say global warming causes, and we have just come out of an El Nino cycle. Causes ice to melt, atmosphere to get warm, more rain & snow. Its all due to tropics air and water being moved due to slowing winds.
OZcheckm8 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A real INCONVENIENT TRUTH to Gore & his Goldman Sachs partners & AGW Cult
Here's a great expose of what the GATT expansion to the WTO (orchestrated by Clinton/Gore) has produced in terms of environmental damage by moving manufacturing in the West that had Environmental laws to pollute with impunity in the Socialists/Limousine Liberals current favorite failed utopia, China
Graphic pictures of the environmental horrors
chinahush(dot)com/2009/10/21/amazing-pictures-pollution-in-china
Thisawareness 1 year ago
Dissolved CO2 makes acid.
By 2100, at current rates of increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, average ocean pH will drop 0.3 - 0.4 and be @ 7.8 with an increase in acidic H+ ion concentration of 150-200%.
That will cause a 50% DECREASE of ocean carbonate ions (CO3).
Carbonate ions are needed for growth by plankton & corals at the base of the ocean's food chain.
Oops!!!
For info. on CO2 ocean acidification check:
Dr. Richard Feely, NOAA
Ocean Acidification Part 1 of 3
/watch?v=0KgRpJxWQDw&NR=1
goog2k 1 year ago
It is a shame to say, that we are doomed!! few will listen,most will ignore in the name of pleasure. our local goverment dont care, why should we? we are killing the earth and there is no stopping it.
shame on us.
MEGABOINK65 1 year ago
allanallanson 1 year ago
CO2 is innocent!
Dr Miskolczi showed that the solution to a differential equation for the greenhouse effect developed in 1922 by Arthur Milne, wrongly assumed an infinitely thick atmosphere. In re-solving this equation a new term and also a new law of physics have been proposed setting an upper limit to the greenhouse effect. Dr Miskolczis theory indicates that any warming from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide will eventually be offset by a change in atmospheric moisture content.
judomagyar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr Miskolczi showed that the solution to a differential equation for the greenhouse effect developed in 1922 by Arthur Milne, wrongly assumed an infinitely thick atmosphere. In re-solving this equation a new term and also a new law of physics have been proposed setting an upper limit to the greenhouse effect. Dr Miskolczis theory indicates that any warming from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide will eventually be offset by a change in atmospheric moisture content
macstone9 1 year ago
Gore is a jackass....and so is the bilderberg group!!!! a handfull of people telling ME to stop living? ( here's the midllefinger for them) ..I.
basmikiemike 1 year ago
The simple solution to most major problems in human society is to STOP THE RISE IN POPULATION.
Our current population doubling rate is 61 years. That is absurd.
Reijerkolle 1 year ago
It's not only global warming. It's all the destroying of the planet by humans.
We must stop this!
natija08 1 year ago
This just in....
Al Gore is the coolest nerd in the world.
Donald Trump is mad so he said Gore should have his Nobel taken from him. Then he said the Chinese think American politicians are the dumbest people in the world because he is a rasist!
Denialist Trump? = Rasist.
Nightverssion 1 year ago
I'm with you bro...
jeffty19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
STILL WARMING!
For an excellent new scientific YouTube investigating the COOLING claims on Global Temps. see:
Climate Change -- Has the Earth been cooling?
/watch?v=xvMmPtEt8dc&feature=sub
HOTTEST JANUARY in UAH satellite record
(UAH/Dr. Christy, renown denier)
"This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Search:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
goog2k 1 year ago
polar bears are assholes
f19r82b 2 years ago
poor animals lyke polar bears and penguins they will not survive b/c of human activities we are causing this to happen we are releasing too much carbon dioxide from our cars,power plants and airlplanes and all of that is going into our atmosphere and the temperatures are heating upp and causing everything to melt and we wont survive unless we do something about it
luzy8127 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch my video, it will blows your mind away! (strong, deep images and cool background music). Thanks!
fridaysabtu 2 years ago