Added: 3 years ago
From: TheRealNews
Views: 2,345
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (108)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Starcatcher is a blowhard. He's not here to add anthing coherent or intelligent to the debate. Ignore him. His intent is to disrupt and marginalize the topic by leading it into a tit for tat exchange of insults and irrevelant statements. Ignore him!

  • So now we're just kicking 'em out on the street with no place to go after arresting and torturing them for no reason?

    Way to reduce the terrorist treat guys! I'm sure this whole war didn't make anyone angry at all.

  • Starcatcher888,

    Why are you scared of legal proceedings?

    Do you believe in 'The Law'?

    Or do you prefer a lawless system for some?

    And when it's your turn in the legal system, shall "we" insist, "NIMBY"?

    Why is a Nation of Law an unacceptable concept for you?

    Why do you hate America?

    .

  • starcatcher888 says: "Islam is NOT what your OPINION is!"

    What star meant was: "Islam is what "I" say it is."

    .

  • hahahaha.....I too can type nonsense starcatcher =)

  • Everything extremists touch turns to shit. Same goes for America these days. The whole western civilization is built on exploiting less "civilized" societies. 50% of the worlds prisoners are held in American jails, and you talk of Russian labor camps! BTW, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin where not communists, they were zionist agents working for the Rothschild's, just like Hitler, Bush and all the other usurpers of power. Concentrated power has allways been the ennemy of freedom.

  • So are you.

  • SImple solution. Their country does'nt want them we don't want them. But I'll cut short the we. I'll take em'. I'll beat em' to death with a pigs leg, one at a time as the world watches. Seems fair better than getting your head cut off.

  • Did you say "S" in Nazi? You mean "S" in NSDAP I guess.

    However, NSDAP was a "national socialst worker's party". One would say a merger of the extreme right and the extreme left (brawlers and street preachers go together well).

    If you truly want to take a lesson out of the 30', you condemn the extreme political agenda of both sides. Most of all then, the attempts to impose that agenda with force.

    I reckon that it what the Realnews does.

  • point taken.

    But seriously, any american who isn't in prison should have the right to own guns. Otherwise the government will take advantage of us (like they are now).

  • How dare you call me a liberal! I am keeping my guns until the day that they are ripped from my fingers.

  • @starcatcher888

    No, Islam is NOT what my OPINION is, nor is it what YOUR OPINION is. We are both distorted, just like everyone else. The way you make such an illogical point sounds like you belong with those who feel that the moon landing never happened.

    Please, just take a step back and present a more moderated logical argument. Attacking my judgement in this way will not change my opinion, in fact, it is probably only enforcing it. Sound logical and I'll go away.

  • permanentpeace(.)org

  • There can be a moderate anything. your "us vs. them" complex is just too strong to realize it.

  • Have you ever actually looked at the world around you? Radical Islam exists, and so does radical christianity. Personally I find both equally repulsive.

    I've been threatened by both, but the christians were worse, they tried to burn me, in public no less! If you knew anything about other religions, you would find their leaders and figures just as grotesqe.

  • They know that 'unbelievers' are those who do not believe in god, which is not nesiccarily Allah. Get over it, my friends are good people, regardless of their faith.

  • Mohammed converted under threat of death. Mohammed killed for his faith(as have christians), and he encouraged his disciples to do the same. He was a man of war and battle. He lead his followers to shun, and kill, non-believers. He often used force for his goals. Mohammed called up his folowers to fight for their faith. And yet many Islamic people know that his rage and vengence was the only way for him to survive then.

  • @starcather888

    If you were more intellegent, people might just listen to you. You seem to be in such a huff because we are calling you on your stereotypes. While a usefull tool in certian instances, yours is much to generalized. Take a step back and look at this logicly.

    You're being outdone by a highschool student.

  • @starcatcher888

    Is there truely 'no such thing'? There is always an exception to a rule, especially when the rule is reached through false conclusions.

    As for a brand of stupid, you are mistaking your own stupidity for my own, so I cannot help you there.

    I do not agree with many of Mohammeds acts, mainly the murder of unbelievers. My 'friends' as you have labeled them, do ont believe that violence is the answer, and they believe that non-violent converstion is that was to unification.

  • @starcather888

    Religon doesn't matter in this context. I have ismalic friends who are fine upstanding people. I even have a friend who wears a burka! They are some of the nicest people you will ever meet. I have christian and jewish friends that are total wack jobs, and I have athestic and agnostic friends who swing both ways. Religon has nothing to do with the person, actions do.

  • Starcatcher888, the only rapid dog I know of is you! How you jump from allowing non citizens to vote from a discussion on the laws of this country in regard to torture is delusional. Parole standards are regulated by the state not the federal government. The hate you contain is not only dangerous to the yourself but to the general public. You should seek help.

  • No idiot, you have to be a US citizen to vote. But our Constitution has been the example that all new nations aspire to! Our rebellion from England inspired the French & Russian revolutions. Being civilized doesn't make us appear weak it show we have the strength to maintain morality.

  • Send them back to China.

    They have absolutely no right being sent anywhere else, that would threaten American Military Personal.

  • Send em home, they are being held illegally and wtf does china have to do with it anyway. Get the personel home then they wont have to worry about losing to these people.

  • Relisten to the video, the video is "only" talking about the detainees from China ... From"Western China". The video is not talking about any other detainees from any where else. They're only talking about detainees from Western China.

  • I hope they hand the entire area to cuba

  • you're fucking nutz, take a goddamn vicodin.

  • i never thought i'd see the day when any american would argue against habeus corpus. it's simply a day in court so that if sufficient evidence exists to charge a person with a crime the state can present it. this person would then know what he was being charged with and could obtain council. without something so basic as this a person could be held forever. imagine the outrage if americans were snapped up en masse in another country and treated this way. admit it, we'd go ballistic.

  • I answered it in no ambiguity. It makes no difference if he's a Muslim blowing up infidels or a non-Muslim killing whomever else. It's a crime to murder according to common sense.

    Haha, I get more ass than you old fucker, and I don't need a penis-pump either.

    Ok seriously this is my last comment. Go die.

  • I did.

  • It makes no difference his religion. What are you trying to prove to me? I'm not a Muslim, nor do I support Islam. What's your point? This is a worthless waste of time. This is my last comment.

    Go fuck yourself, fascist.

  • Did the U.S. Media said anything about Sami Haddad? HELL NO...

    and I wonder why!!!??

  • No he doesn't deserve the same rights, he's a criminal and he should be treated as such. Why do I have to answer these retarded questions? Oh yeah, because you're senile.

  • lol an old dude with wrinkly shriveled testicles and who needs a penis-pump is trying to "out-man" me. How pathetic.

  • Where have I ever suggested that? These straw-men and red herrings are really pathetic. I'm surprised that an old man such as yourself can have debate skills at the level of a third-grader.

  • Speaking from experience? Did somebody bitch-slap your fat wrinkly face?

  • Your time is nearly up. And good thing too, because you've offered nothing useful to this world.

  • The answer would be Yes, but I don't support Osama bin Laden.

  • Good thing you're a Christian, because that should mean you aren't afraid of death. This is good, because death is looming over you like a shadow.

    You start to feel older, you get fatter, your skin gets wrinklier, you become less sexually active, you get tired more often, and thoughts of death become more frequent. You are approaching the end. Please hurry up, your life here on Earth has been nothing but a waste of time and energy.

  • Holy fucking shit! All you are good at is changing the subject! That's all you can do.

    HAVE A STROKE ALREADY!

  • Damn! For an old man, you really are a fucking prick.

    Go fuck yourself and die you senile fascist.

    FASCIST FASCIST FASCIST!

  • If it is clear that they will attack to kill, then I have no problems with killing them first. That doesn't mean I can wantonly kill whomever based on economic interests or what have you, as the U.S. does.

    Apparently you've never read the New Testament. Christ says "turn thy other cheek," therefore one cannot be a Christian and believe in self-defense. Fortunately I'm not a Christian.

  • How is that even a relevant statement? You're the one who brought up Islam, not me.

    The only reason I continue to talk with you is the hope that the argument makes your blood pressure get too high so that you have heart failure or something.

  • I am not a Christian so I do believe in self-defense; and there's a vital difference between defending one's country and defending the interests of predator multinational corporations.

  • Is that all your good at? Changing the subject? Before we were talking about human rights and law in the United States, and all of a sudden you get tired of that (because you don't really have much of an argument), and so you want to go on about Islam and this and that.

    Why haven't you died yet? It seems like you're getting all roused up, I would've figured that you'd have had a stroke by now.

  • See? You had nothing to say about it, because it was an example against your argument.

    Geez how long is it going to take for you to get a fucking heart attack already?

  • Yeah whatever, grandpa. We all know you're senile and you have Alzheimer's. And unlike you, I actually don't want to rule the world. But of course, you were probably a bastard child born from the anus of Hitler's dog.

  • Let's take the example of Sami al-Hajj, the reporter who was wrongly imprisoned in Guantánamo and just recently released. He was never presented with any evidence against him and he could never challenge anything. What have you to say about this instance? Does the U.S. have the right to simply fuck with whomever for no reason? I imagine you'd say "yes" because you are a fascist pig.

  • You truly are an unabashed fascist.

    Don't you have more important things to be doing, like breaking your hip or dying from a heart attack?

  • It's only common sense that you don't hold people in detention without any evidence against them. Your logic is basically "guilty until proven innocent" which is fundamentally contrary to all notions of Justice and Democracy and Human Rights.

  • Are you anxious for one of them to rape your old wrinkly ass, huh?

  • If you don't respect Habeas Corpus, then don't ever pretend to value things like Democracy and Freedom and Justice.

    You are a fascist pig, or perhaps you're really senile (unless your channel is lying about your age). If you are indeed 66, I'll just say that I'm very glad that you don't have many days left on this Earth.

  • You are seriously fucked up.

    You didn't answer my question. DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF HABEAS CORPUS?

  • That's the thing, is that you can't determine if somebody is a terrorist or not if Habeas Corpus isn't respected. You do understand the concept of Habeas Corpus, right?

  • The right to a trial is on the UN charter when people are enemy combatants. The constitution also works on them because they are enemy combatants even if bushy doesn't call them that.

  • WTF this starcatch guy is a lunatic LOL.

  • You are a dumbass and I'm sure you don't know what the story is at all. They are not trying to become US citizens! They want to go to their own countries... Are you 4 years old starcatcher or are you another neocon?

  • Wtf is wrong with you starcatcher. They don't want to become your next door american neighbor idiot. They want to go home. Imprisoning people on suspicion like this is fascism.

  • You are the one without the moral compass starcatch. I can't even understand how you are making this shit up and let alone that you look like you comment only to tell us how much you hate everyone else.

  • Starcatcher888- WTF are you talking about?

  • Go watch Taxi to the Dark Side

  • So when we oppose our laws on other people they should have no rights?

  • As all religions (christianity included)... Religion is just a fear-mongering propaganda machine!

  • We are not talking about other countries we are talking about the rules and truths that this country was founded on, not only for its citizen but for all. We find these truths to be self evident, that ALL men are created equal . . ." The pledge of allegiance ends "with liberty and justice for ALL" Not all Americans. How can we be the great nation we are and resort the the tactics of barbarians?

  • You speak of things you know nothing about. Only wahabbi muslims are that hardcore. I remember a time not so long ago when good christians would burn innocent women at the stake for heresy. Fear is the problem and you, cammerade, are full of it!

  • "You mean because I find this intollerable?

    That makes me a bigot?"

    well yeah

  • Allright, Hitler!

  • You'd be really good as a German SS.

  • Sorry I guess bigot would be more accurate.

  • Starcatcher what are you doing here? Your a FOX News type of guy. You are here just to argue.

  • As for prisoners in Gitmo, each case is unique and carries with it its own set of circumstances. If there is sufficient evidence that the prisoner in question has committed any crimes, then charge them with said crimes and throw them on trial. We are over there in the Middle East under this guise of spreading democracy and proving that our system of government works. Why would we abandon our rule of law right in the middle of this effort?

  • Did you even watch the video... Sigh...

  • Name it the way you would like. Like the Native lands your grandparents stole from the Native Indians. But we will know what is what and who is who.

  • You want to about rule of law lets talk about how the United States supported Saddam and Chemical Ali! You want to talk about rule of LAW lets talk about how no WMD where found. Who here has no rule of law? Who here refuses to ban cluster bombs? Give no quarters to the inquisition and crusaders!

  • you are acting like a four year old. My very first comment was a question, you have replied several times but no answer.. That alone should clue you into how wrong you are. You only spout a bunch of narrow-minded BS. I'll give you one more try before I move on... you are wasting time.

  • That's Excellent and hope its true. Anytime any government can arrest anyone and hold them under suspicion without a hearing and a fair trial you are in a fasist state. my opinion the Supreme Court needs to order the overturning of every act this president and his nazi administration put together and wrote into acts of law since taking office...including the desolvation of Homeland Security, which is an unnecessay agency and most certainly overturn the patriot act!!!

  • Your Comment: "You want what you are not willing to give!"

    You just proved one of my points. "To NOT torture"

    Thanks.. now answer my question.

  • because i asked you with my very first comment and you still have not answered.

  • you are a sad human. I would have agreed with much of what you are saying had you answered my question. Unfortunately, you are incapable of honest debate.

    Again you make several false assumptions. (example: I said nothing about waterboarding or practically anything else you mentioned). I simply asked a question. If anyone here is a lying joke... readers will clearly see it is you. Your meager mind is clouded with hate which deprives you of freedom of thought. You = Waste of Freedom and time.

  • I condemn rape especially the women who where raped in Vietnam! When America invaded and dropped the rainbow of Agent colors on the people. Destroying the environment just like it continues its rampage across the globe. Destroying water and the beast lust for black oil. This nature of danger to human kind will disappear like boats in the Bermuda Triangle.

  • Your assumptions are way off. You are talking out your ass... you are incapable of answering a simple question.

  • First of "WE" the people Demand a social democratic society. Not this bullshit Plutocracy shit that both Obama and McCain represent. You want to talk about change, what change? Obama foreign policy makers where all part of the Clinton Administration. <---Is this change or a Monarchy? Or how about the other option people have McCain? O I am not even going to debate about that guy who thinks Hamas is in South Africa.

  • Communism has saved lives, Cuba on one hand creates doctors who go to other nations to help save lives. While capatilism goes to other nations to destroy them. To open their markets and to exploit their resources. Where in the world has capatilism strive at? Asia? Latin America? Where?

  • I don't understand racists it sounds to me that a lot of the time they're angry and fearful. I can't imagine that people like that are actually happy.

    I feel for these people sometimes.

    Well only sometimes. ;)

  • @starcatcher: I think your kind of picking and choosing how you see Islam. You see something that a Muslim did (or wrote) that was not very nice, and you choose to only see those things when you think of Islam. As a result you don't end up getting a realistic picture of the people or religion. Because when it comes to humanity the story is never that one sided.

    I suggest you have a more open minded attitude. I know many Muslims they are as diverse in their beliefs as anybody.

  • Your question is confused, society decides collectively what rape is. Consider that despite 2000 years of "christian values", it was still legal to rape your wife until only a few decades ago. Values are in flux, we decide what is right and what is wrong not some ancient book.

  • The important news is that a United States senator came out again against Cuba. While the critique Cuba they support Saudi Arabia monarchy which have men at the age of 70 marring girls at the age of 7 and younger. The United Nations has condemned the god damn sanctions on Cuba. Now that is something to talk about. Also how the U.S. talks about Human Rights when they are not even part of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Real Democracy for Puerto Rico! Not your implemented dictatorships!

  • I am not defending Islam. I am asking you personally (by your own values).

    "many rapists go unpunished... does that justify being a rapist?"

  • Apparently you can not answer the question?

    Give a honest answer to my question (a simple yes or no) and I will answer yours.

  • I did not ask if rape were a crime. I asked a simple question.

    "many rapists go unpunished... does that justify being a rapist?"

    Your false assumptions mean nothing. If you can not answer the question, don't reply.

    It is hard enough to read your prejudice comments because they are rightfully thumbed down by everybody.

    Tip: If everybody disagrees with you... you may be wrong.

  • It's not my job to condemn as much as I may want to.

    Pointless to condemn dead people, don't you think? ;)

    We are ALL disgraced and embarrassed by crimes of humanity. Have we come no further since those times?

    If we condemn them- mustn't we NOT repeat them? Mustn't we rise above and follow, say, a "Geneva Convention" despite that which our professed enemies do?

  • Agreed, then we show them how evolved we are as fighting only shows our ability to drop down to the level of those who are fearful, ignorant and violent.

  • Expletitives and caps do not make your arguments correct, logical, or worthwhile ;)

  • they should go after bush next. he is hiding behind his little made up rules to protect himself. he is going down.

  • I can name any number of Christians whose example I would not follow. I can name any number of self-described Buddhists whose example I would not follow.

    All I can follow is what I believe- not what anyone has tried to shove down my throat or spoon-fed me in mainstream media.

    Get to know a Muslim. Overcome your prejudices, reach out and become educated- you may be pleasantly surprised.

  • "Stupid fucks like you." Labeling and divisiveness does not peace promote. I have no obligation to advocate slaughtering of innocents to feel "safe." I feel less "safe" and "defended" knowing that wars are being waged, pre-emptively, in my name.

  • God didn't put a disclaimer in the Bible. I believe he said that under all occasions. Killing is wrong, don't do it. No, no one should feel obligated to save my silly ass. I don't welcome death but I'm not afraid of it. Death is inevitable one way or the other, and when I die, I know where my soul will go.

  • Comparing Muslim Societies:

    Knowledge and the State in a World Civilization

    Juan R. I. Cole (editor)

    The University of Michigan Press 1992

  • "You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. But if I do judge, My decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with The Father, who sent Me." (John 8:15-16)

  • Thou shalt not kill.

  • Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

  • They torture our soldiers because your war president, the commander and chief has authorized torture and lied to the rest of us about it.

  • It's the death nail for "enemy combatant" which is a contrived status to get around Geneva. I really hope it's the death nail for torture.

  • many rapists go unpunished... does that justify being a rapist?

  • The government is the government. So far they have gottent away with just about anything they wanted to as far as i can tell, including subverting democracy. All this is a little late unless they go ahead and install McCain as the next president. Fair and unbuggered elections has been only a dream since 2000. I don't think GeorgeWad was elected. Where are we at now? Something is beginning to change? Maybe and a little late as well. Maybe just another propaganda ploy?

  • Who will be held accountable and pay

    the price for the many people tortured to

    death, forced to suicide, raped and hurt in other ways if, in a how we know now illegal

    way ?

  • Bush should be tried for his war crimes. Authorizing torture should get him there.

  • This administration has been an unmitigated disaster for liberty in America and abroad. Whilst it is heartening to see the possible end of Gitmo, it is unclear if the next administration under Obama or McCain will be doing anything meaningful to remedy the situation. Going by the capitulation of the majority Democratic party on Capitol Hill, this is unlikely. It's so unfortunate that Ron Paul did not achieve a better result.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more