@HungarianHistory May I ask you about the Baltids ? are Lithuanians and Latvians mostly Baltid ? because the name kinda gives me that clue.If so how did 8 percent get to Hungary ? another nice little notice is our symbolism,we both use the double cross we on our "Vytis" and you on your national symbol the double cross on the crown. :)
scythians=huns from ruler lines, culture, style etc.
the different only the joined common people.
the 5 scythian folks were these: hun, chus, avar, daha, sabir.
these folks were from Subartu, Sumer and Elam. (Caspian expansions bc 3000-bc 2500?)
Sabirs and Huns migrated to East EU Steppe-Caucasus-Siberi Regio, Others and some huns too, migrated to Tatarian Steppe. The name hun is from Hunor (their leader) the common people was tatar.
we are savar hurrians and hun-onogurs. the savar or sabir magyar tribe was the "uralic" speaker the onogurs were ural-altaian lanmguage speakers. (huns) the hunnic language had uralic words too from scythian language(hurrian) and altaian too. read isfahan kodex named armanian-hunnic dictionary.
other folks in our ethnogenesis the alanians, sarmatian yaziges, palóc cumans, kipcak cumans, avars, székely huns, pannon parsi scythians from pamir, dahas (dacians) from Caspian regio.
Bulgarians are two part. One of them are Volga Bulgars they are Chuvash TURKs and the second part are Balkan Bulgars. They are the Bulgarians who were actually TURKs but later they have lost their identity and Slavieted and they believe they would be not TURK but Slavs after they were christianizied.
@Askar590
the turanian civilization werent born in asia, but in europe and middle east.
european ancestors: gravettian, kőrös, linear pottery, kurgan, trypillia, vinca cultures
middle easterns: catal hüyük, fertile cerscent, tell halaf, hasuna, subar and sumer.
the knowledge from the middle east, not form asia, asians are joined, ruled people in this story.
HungarianHistory 9 months ago
@Askar590
Atilla wasnt ugric, he was taurid from paternal line and maybee asian from maternal.
All hunnic rulers were from middle Eastern high cultures man, sumer, subartu and elam.
onogurs were the ural-altaians. I send a video im PM for You about Carpathian reconstructed faces! look some avars, huns, magyars.
HungarianHistory 9 months ago
hungarian types
34% turanid-alföldi (native carpathians and turanian mixture)
15% pamirid
8%taurid
8% baltid
4% nordid
others are dinaroid, alpin, mediterran, and mixtures.
HungarianHistory 9 months ago
@HungarianHistory May I ask you about the Baltids ? are Lithuanians and Latvians mostly Baltid ? because the name kinda gives me that clue.If so how did 8 percent get to Hungary ? another nice little notice is our symbolism,we both use the double cross we on our "Vytis" and you on your national symbol the double cross on the crown. :)
DelTevynes 8 months ago
@Askar590
The eurasian folks were from tribal unios.
Leaders were : taurid (middle eastern-persian faced)
others were :turanid, pamirid, nordid, and the small were mongoloid.
Attilas nation wasnt mongol.. He had :onogur-sabir-uze-german tribes XD. Genghis khan had mongol.
tatar=onogur
HungarianHistory 9 months ago
@Askar590
scythians=huns from ruler lines, culture, style etc.
the different only the joined common people.
the 5 scythian folks were these: hun, chus, avar, daha, sabir.
these folks were from Subartu, Sumer and Elam. (Caspian expansions bc 3000-bc 2500?)
Sabirs and Huns migrated to East EU Steppe-Caucasus-Siberi Regio, Others and some huns too, migrated to Tatarian Steppe. The name hun is from Hunor (their leader) the common people was tatar.
common people vs. ruler tirbes! Scythia-Tartaria.
HungarianHistory 9 months ago
*****
SzekelyBarnaAttiIaMG 10 months ago
bulgarians are not turkic they're indo-european.The turkic theory is a soviet propaganda
nemurad 11 months ago
Good video!
TheHunpower1 11 months ago
@Askar590
the xiongnu khanate was multinational, mongols, manchus, oghuzes, ogurs (tochar, yuezhi), assoi.
and spoke in : uralian, türkic, iranaian with common words to sumaerian language.
your knowledge is 50%, you forgot the other 50% evidences!
HungarianHistory 11 months ago
Hungarian people are in origin Cuman Turks and Bulgars are Turkic too Cuvash etc. and we TATARS are not Bulgar Turks we are kipcak(cuman)!
TatarTuruk 11 months ago
@TatarTuruk
we are savar hurrians and hun-onogurs. the savar or sabir magyar tribe was the "uralic" speaker the onogurs were ural-altaian lanmguage speakers. (huns) the hunnic language had uralic words too from scythian language(hurrian) and altaian too. read isfahan kodex named armanian-hunnic dictionary.
other folks in our ethnogenesis the alanians, sarmatian yaziges, palóc cumans, kipcak cumans, avars, székely huns, pannon parsi scythians from pamir, dahas (dacians) from Caspian regio.
HungarianHistory 11 months ago
@HungarianHistory
the pannons were illirians or celts, the scythians were iranians, etc. are aryan tales from german nationalists
HungarianHistory 11 months ago
Hungarian = Turkic nation not Bulgar Bulgar = Turkic !
TuranUlkucuGenc 11 months ago
Bulgarians are two part. One of them are Volga Bulgars they are Chuvash TURKs and the second part are Balkan Bulgars. They are the Bulgarians who were actually TURKs but later they have lost their identity and Slavieted and they believe they would be not TURK but Slavs after they were christianizied.
muratti05 11 months ago
@muratti05 only turk believe this bullshit.When there were bulgarians,turks didnt even existed.
sleeper7271 11 months ago
@muratti05 The world is TURK!!!!!!!!!!!
thracianglad 11 months ago
Comment removed
TatarTuruk 11 months ago
We are not Bolgar T. we are Kypcak Turkic....
Chuvas peeople are Bolgar
TatarTuruk 11 months ago