Halving that budget would be a step in the right direction.
The federal budget in 2001 was $1.85 trillion, roughly half of Obama's proposed budget. That includes off-budget appropriations.
I got that number from GPOacessDOTgov.
Heck, even the Democratic Party in 1932 stood for reducing the budget by 25%. Check out the 1932 platform. Too bad that's not what happened, though, hehe.
Chris Edwards got edited to sound like a Democrat.... hee hee
youneverheard 2 years ago
Halving that budget would be a step in the right direction.
The federal budget in 2001 was $1.85 trillion, roughly half of Obama's proposed budget. That includes off-budget appropriations.
I got that number from GPOacessDOTgov.
Heck, even the Democratic Party in 1932 stood for reducing the budget by 25%. Check out the 1932 platform. Too bad that's not what happened, though, hehe.
MooseOfReason 2 years ago
Just because the republicans have no credibility on spending restraint does not mean the democrats are vindicated.
It simply means they are both worthless.
FlailingJunk 2 years ago 12
I agree 100% with you
LeGioNoFZioN 2 years ago