Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Point in case? is for this experiment? you will have a center magnet on the axle that has two north poles or two south poles. And it will generate a huge Kinetic or static flux. This flux can be picked up with A set of ignition coils, hooked too a magneto winding placed around a Carbon rod.

  • Want a realy cool experiment? Take your spindle, and glue to magnets south pole to south pole, or north pole to north pole. you will get a magnet with only one pole. on it, now take two of these magnets and face the mono-pole out from the center of your coil and turn it on.

  • think about it like the experiment where you fill a 2 liter bottle and punch a nial hole in it drill it out too 1/4 inch, and take a second empty bottle and glue them cap to cap, when you spin it? the Hour glass shaped bottle assembaly?

    it makes a vissable whirl pool. These coils make a magnetic vortex.

    It is wide, like two wheel's of magnetic field spinning opposet each other around the center point. You want a realy cool experiment?

  • Magneto like a motor cycle or lawn mower.

  • It's not an ad hominem since I'm referring to your ethos. Walter Russell isn't in the same ballpark as Nikola Tesla, not even close. Philosophy is nothing more than conjecture and loose associations. I have never heard of Rodin talk about anything near a Planck length. There is lots of debate on multiple theories using Occam's razor. It is posited that in quantum mechanics that if something is repeated indefinitely, the event being searched for will happen. so...

  • @Peacemaker2027 ...one hypothesis states that there was something in another pocket in the 11th dimension that clashed together and chanced the creation of our universe.

  • This guy has never heard of thermodynamics, you can't get something for nothing.

  • @Peacemaker2027 Then how does the universe exist?

  • @CanadianStoner1001 That is a distracting question. Nobody has confirmed how the universe came to be. Read up on thermodynamics and singularities.

  • @Peacemaker2027 I understand thermodynamics, but you see my point. There is no such thing as "nothing" anyway because to label nothing is a contradictory statement because then it becomes something. I suggest reading some walter russell.

  • @CanadianStoner1001 First off, your user name does nothing for your credibility as a "scientist". Secondly I wouldn't waste my time reading that rubbish by Walter Russell when his "theories" are not even sourced correctly and verified. Thirdly philosophy and science do not mix well together, your statement about "nothing" being contradictory is called a red herring and a play on words. This man is a quack!

  • @Peacemaker2027 1st, great ad hominem. 2nd walter russell and nikola tesla had a much better understanding of the universe then most "scientists" today, "sourced and verified" or not. 3rd philosophy is a precursor to science, but forget all that. The problem becomes where did (all) energy come from if something can't come from nothing (or the concept of 'nothing')? Assuming the universe is an isolated system and that the big bang might of happened (its still a theory).

  • imo, the best twin opposing vortex writings come from Walter Russell. Read "A new concept of the Universe" and "The Secret Of Light". When you understand the mechanics of the REAL universe, then we can begin to make things that emulate natures clean engine technology and do away with this horrible Explodemia that infects mankind's mind with ONE WAY heat death big wank garbage...Check out "the secret of light dot com"

  • I understand exactly what they have done. They have actually replicated how the Earth works. The 'by product' of the two vortices of Earth is magnetism which radiates from the centre of the Earth from the joining of the top and bottom vortices of the planet (think star of david). 19.47 degrees is the location on every planet structure of the 2D entry point of these 2 centripetal forces and creates Earths gravity. This is also why it's cold at the poles as a by product of nature is cooling too

  • To make it a speaker is simple and I know what to do. It could fund the other work. Just removing the center won't do.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • This actually makes sense and I can see what is going on. He is genarating more 200% energy from a source that is only 1.5 % of the energy actually generated that is amazing. CAn you not see that?

  • What's odd is, Jamie Butruff disassociated himself with this project or at least removed the videos from his account. Not sure why.

    But what I do know is that there is a simple explanation for their 'magnetic monopole'. They magnetize asymmetrically shaped objects (which can weaken one of the poles by spreading it out more) and they use a simple non-numerical detector that beeps only when a threshold gauss is measured. I'm in no way saying they do it intentionally but that is what is going on.

  • This whole "Rodin" coil thing is complete and utter nonsense.

  • @User2718218 Random people say pointless things.

    One love, TheUMMCorg

  • @theUMMCorg Two years later and do you think that Marko and Jamie have made any progress? The whole speaker thing is nonsense and there is a ridiculously simple explanation for it. All that you need to know are the most basic fundamental concepts in electricity and magnetism to explain the speaker effect. So why is it being pitched by Jamie as something "special?"

  • @User2718218 you user obviously have trouble keeping up with the class

  • @Skryde I bet you neither Marko or Jamie are capable of telling you how an inductor really works. It's a complete farce.

  • @User2718218 maybe you should make one, i did

  • @Skryde Okay great you made one. What were your results, conclusions, etc? What did you do with it? What did you learn?

  • ummc, maybe this will help you and whoever understand what electricity and magnetism really is.

    einsteingravity(dot)com

  • ummc, maybe this will help you and whoever else understand what electricity and magnetism really is.

    einsteingravity(dot)com

  • A few questions, baring in mind i know very little :D

    How credible is this theory?

    How recent?

    If its breakthrough why isnt it all over the news?

    It seems poorly presented in terms of being long winded and unproffesional. Rodin himself seems quite unnerving/offputting, possibly why people arent following?

  • @PsyControL1 youtube search: Rodin coil , upload date, etc...

    thank you, The UMMC

  • i wanna help i need to help. this is the reason we need to wake from the cocoon and flourish! Lets wake them up.

  • I'd just like to point out, in response to scooterscottii in saying "because of the symmetry/polarity of the RODIN MATH, would it be advisable....." - since it is "Rodin Math" but it's also just the numbers 1 thru 9 and the 4 movements (times\divide\plus\minus), it is even more remarkable since everyone on the planet as far as I know, uses the base ten decimal system with 9 numbers and 4 directions. "Rodin maths" is really more like number theory where each have fundermental characteristics etc.

  • another thought ... because of the symmetry/polarity of the Rodin math would it be advisable when energising the coil to use pulsed DC instead (at a certain frequency) rather than AC? I assume you are using AC as in your other videos? Also just a thought ... magnetism/field energy are complimenting/assisting each other in the field patterns of the coil? Scott

  • Makro and Jamie ... perhaps try pulsing the Rodin coil with solfeggio frequencies using a signal generator or function generator. MARKO do any of these # sequences mean anything to you? 396 417 528 639 741 852 963 GOOD LUCK! Scott

  • excellent video jamie ive seen your wrapping videos and have been working on an automated winder to save time.hope you've seen my other post. maybe you can beat me to the end of developing the generator idea. goodluck

  • hula anyone an idea i'm working on with rodin coilscreate an internal spin with magnets inseide hula hoop with rodin coils standine on end to center magnetic field to the inside of hula hoop. where 1" long by 3/8" long rod magnets reside.

  • Hate to say it but I don't see anything here.

  • Try getting your you know what out of your you know what.

  • Thank You to jamie, Marko & the poster of this Vid

    Cant get enough of Markos theories...... It all makes so much sense

    Please keep up the good work to all involved :)

  • Freedom for the wires to move, in acoustic application, perhaps others.

    The toroid number series would be different, as the web would be layered 2D rather than spinning 3D.

    To me, the idea to creat space for the 3-6-9 of individual winds of wire seems interesting to explore, rather than stacking them first and then leave a gap. I think it could be done with the donut shape as well, by using a non-conducting 3rd wire.

    I may see thing too simplified, but hope I can offer smarter others a spark.

  • In stead of winding around the core...

    This of a tennis racket's lacing, but 3-D. The wires would loop through hooks or holes stacked vertically, to lay out a horizontal web of wiring. The 3-6-9 gaps would exist through-out the 3-D web. The layers of wire would be 100% vertically mirrored, not "cascading" as they are now.

  • could wrap the Rodin coil around an ICE toroid... and then melt the ice to end up with just the wire coil.

  • Thanx!!!

  • thank you for uploading!!!

  • i want to see the little generators taking advantage of the torsion b field!!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more