Bradley FV firing weapons

[seamarine1940]

Music to my ears ! love that 25mm and COAX !

[zerocker45]

BMP-2/3 and Puma's weapons are far superior to those on the Bradley. Bradley is not amphibious either is too heavy.

[billy1212ist]

The "Bradley" took 17 YEARS,to design and build a prototype.The cost was $ 14 BILLION DOLLARS which we,the Tax Payers paid.What do you think of that ?

[gregordiesel]

Save the shells and sell them on ebay!!!

[MsCasper2010]

i they kill someone in texas, they are murderer, but if they kill people on a poor country, they are Heroes

[ozzy1351]

@MsCasper2010 They're not heros for killing people........there SOLDIERS/MARINES/SAILORS protecting their brothers and following orders so they can come back home ALIVE! Some stupid motherfucker with an AK or RPG wants to prevent that......HE DIES! End of story.

[baileydogify]

@demosthenets

I assure you, the us marines are not undertrained. I know you are making fun of us but they do go through very intense training.

[ak907jk]

@baileydogify yea lol just hung out with my friend who just got out of the marines he wasn't that strong before basic and now he is fuckin ripped and was telling me about marine training and it is fucking hard core anyone who says it is easy are just fucking trolls and would probably pass out the first 10 minutes of training.

[billy1212ist]

@baileydogify * Google,...Money Machine,then Rothschild,Rockefeller,The Crown.You will learn that Wars,and "Their Outcomes" are all Planed.Rothschild,gave Millions,to BOTH sides,France,England,Telling both"You win,you pay the "losers" share.Rockefeller (Standard Oil) sold $20 Million in New Gas Additive,to Hitler,I.G.Farben was third party.Union Bank of NYC,got the cash.Prescott Bush the Broker,father and grandfather to two Presidents.Learn what is being done to you.

[30secondstomarscam]

keep jumping every time he fires lol

[GreenKillerPuppet]

Why are people bitching about the US taking over the world? Or accusing the US' policy of "policing the world," fake? US knows it's fake, or it has to at least benefit the US in some way.

You make it sound like Britain never did it, France never did it, Mongolia never did it, Russia never did it, Arabs never did it, Italians never did it, and China is not doing it right now.

Everyone wants to take down the king of the hill, and the king of the hill has to fight the hardest to stay up there.

[billy1212ist]

@GreenKillerPuppet - Washington DC,The Vatican,London City(1 sq.mi.)within London,are NOT PART of the Countries they are in.They are Separate Countries unto themselves,known as The Crown.They control the world.They OWN,the worlds Media,we are fed,what they choose.In 1735,The NWO was started.The worlds 30 wealthiest families,Rule.Google-Money Machine, Rothschild, Rockefeller, The Crown.LEARN what they DID NOT tell us in school.Hitler was given Millions,to start a world war,it was planed.The Banks

[swedishvolvo]

@GreenKillerPuppet You can still be the toughest guy on the block without having to go around and trying to start fights.

[Boonamal]

@TheGreatestVids I think he means technologically.

[MrHongKongBuffet]

As the owner of a few Chrysler products, I'm glad that Chrysler doesn't make our tanks anymore. I've had 2 Jeeps (ZJs) and they had very bad, very different problems, almost like they were built in two totally different factories. Chrysler, GM, and Ford made some sweet equipment and vehicles during WWII (often cheaper and better than dedicated military manufacturers), but I think that they've lost their touch. If Buick or Cadillac went back into building military vehicles, that would be cool.

[TwistedComplex]

ill never get used to the fact that crysler makes our tanks... it just feels wrong

[DonMeaker]

@TwistedComplex Chrysler sold their tank manufacturing plant to General Dynamics as part of the first Chrysler-Iacoccoa bail out in the 1980s. Now, with a second bail out they are on the frequent filer plan.

[WWS2286]

hahaha...... camera man's reaction on the first shot is priceless!!

[demosthenets]

Im not dissing America's army in any way but their marines are severely under trained compared to ours (Canada). Now i know some people are going to take this like im making fun of their army. Im not. For a Canadian soldier to go into a conflict zone, they require a minimum of 6 months of specific training to the environment on top of basic training. Please no one get mad... Brothers in Arms right?

[TwistedComplex]

@demosthenets we have too many people signing up for the military to spend too much time with them, our government just prefers to give them a gun and send them into the grinder. i guess they try to balance quality with quantity

[demosthenets]

@TwistedComplex i see your point. Canada in total has about 47,000 enlisted full time servicemen due to our small population so instead of having a large amount of people to spend so much money on training we can manage to train our troops longer and more effectively for a lower cost.

[intrax3000]

@demosthenets your totally wrong here my pal Marines do not TRAIN they UNTRAIN! to limit their awesome ubermesch powers.

[4thinfantry112]

@demosthenets Don't take this the wrong way but the Dutch took Hans Island away from you with a half a squad of unarmed marines. Sorry bro but American Marines would eat you guys for breakfast.

[nnixon6]

pobinr.

You are either from a country saved by the USA from it's own terror or are from a county beaten by the USA for promoting terror.

Either way, you, you children and your childrens children are our slaves.

Now just say "thank you" and STFU.

[stupidCIAagent]

@nnixon6 the typicall american badass they free the world from terrorists tyranny and communism i think the world should be free from you if you are against tyranny why didnt you come to Argentina in the 60s to the 80s to free us from the fucking military goverment that bathed inocent people in boiling water to torture them?and avoid that 1000 18 year old boys get their asses kicked by the english special forces?

[SATXDANCER]

@stupidCIAagent Why are we gonna help Argentina, a country that has expressed publically it's hate towards the US? Makes no sense at all. I'm just saying...

[stupidCIAagent]

@SATXDANCER not now asshole i mean in the 70s and 80s when your world freedom campaing was in its peak

[julian111993]

@stupidCIAagent i guess argentina problems war less worse than vietnam oder korea

[yourcomingoffstupid]

240 going off... very nice

[pobinr]

Reminds me of Himmler.'If we don't kill all the Jews including their children then they will grow up& kill us'.

Y don't u stupid yanks get on with the job properly&kill all Iraqis incase theyll kill u. In fact just kill all nonAmericans.Seems like you're God's chosen people.The land of the free.Free to be gay.Free to bear arms even if you're aburglar&murderer.Free2get shafted by yor government takingu in2pointless wars.God Bless Urmerica,shame bout yor pi55 for beer.USA laughing stock of world.

[seanson38]

@pobinr What shithole country are you from?

[4thinfantry112]

@pobinr Your just jealous. It shows man it really does. Now STFU and go get a big mac. The golden arch, we've planted all over the world.

[dontmakemeMAD1990]

is this the new version or the old version

[Pixelhate1]

i have one of that tank!!!!

[alexsully]

bradleys gettin phased out, afghan terrain not good for brads

[killerpups17]

best light Tank ever!

[thenoobfactor]

@killerpups17. Not a light tank, or a tank at all. Its an Infantry fighting vehicle, basicly a tracked personel carrier with more firepower.

[killerpups17]

@thenoobfactor ye but its something like a tank^^

[piperzdad]

19D--Scouts Out-OOHRAH

[DADDYDRAGONGIRL]

i am a bradley commander 19D cav scout 2 combat rotations in iraq and i can tell you that the brad, is pure gunfighter, i am now retired from the army 23 years + 19D all the way

[KewazingaBabinga]

I feel sorry for that nice palmtree

[pxdfover]

same here...

[weeruz]

@KewazingaBabinga Thats what you get for growin in the wrong place..

[Cobra666Commander]

Most variants of the Bradley carry 2 TOW missiles, more than enough for any anti-tank (or even anti-helicopter) threats.

[XultimateninjaX55]

@Cobra666Commander You make no sense.Anti-tank is a type of armor penatrating explosive.Not a type of threat if thats what your saying.

[spydernyne983]

@Cobra666Commander  True, the only one currently in sevice that doesn't have the TOW is the M7 BFIST

[yourcomingoffstupid]

25mm chain gun is hilarious to see firing... loud as shit. !!!

[huntwds]

Remember how this vehicle was trashed when it was first developed?

[Ialocin85]

youtube . com/watch?v=LKdwuOxYRI4

please watch! thats what a APC should be all about

[Ialocin85]

The swedish CV-90 40

40mm bofor auto-canon eats this apc for breakfast :P

[MorganKeyes]

Well, it's easy enough to get a 40mm on an IFV when you don't have to worry about transporting them overseas.

CV-90 is a nice vehicle that had 17 years to watch IFV development before work started. Is the Brad perfect? Nope. Is it good at it's job? Experience seems to bear out that it is. CV-90 a good track? I think so too. Sure it has it's own warts, but I ain't one to bash on an ally for no reason. Let's not be parochial.

[Haringetdjurepitet]

Hell yeah! :oD

[princeaferd]

take into consideration the hellfire missiles

[Ialocin85]

@princeaferd

The cv can fit both a 120mm gun and hellfire :)

[princeaferd]

lol the cv that fits the missiles is protype and non mass produced ty

[Ialocin85]

@princeaferd

? we have better rockets than the hellfire anyways.

[princeaferd]

hahhahah just give up

[Ialocin85]

@princeaferd

I dont get your point. So a APC is the shit only with hellfire?

The CV90 can fit more shit to it, than this vehicle can.

kiss my ass!

[princeaferd]

hahahah now your just getting frustrated, no the apc isnt the only one with missiles in main military use, but ur cv90 does not have a single vehicile in masin military production with a missile system, as much as u wana say it does, it doesnt and by saying the cv90 can fit more shit into it, well that was a desperate comment considering that the cv90 is smaller and less cargo room than a bradley, in fact a cv90 has smaller interior room than the bradley, bionix afv, warrior, and many bmps,

[princeaferd]

so yeah, i dont get your point hahahah, cuz its just made up bs with no facts just emotional support by you. im sorry you have some weird attachment to the cv90, which is funny cuz its has not been put on the field yet in combat so you have no expiernce with it on that level, so im guessing you are from a country like sweeden or close to there, makes it very obvious, hahah lets just say your a brand label guy and you will support anything made localy hahahahahahah peace out

[dietercav82]

no m242 bushmaster,

lay off the coax and lay some 25

[admiraljimmy]

recoil took you by surprise the first shot nice haha.

[scottstube247]

Wow, didn't realise how much sound the main cannon makes - that machine gun also seems pretty vicous. Nice video.

[bcat98pacbellnet]

Plus, I love that sweet sound of the gyros spinning. Really good demo.

[bcat98pacbellnet]

that is a good demo. most people don't realize just how much punch there is to that 'small' 25 mm chain gun.

Plus, I hear those Bradleys have TOW missiles attached too. Our old LAV's didn't have that.

[mgibbs88]

That m240 barrel is going to be HOT

[dammthedude]

Do you know if the USMC use Bradleys?

[mousehunter311]

nope, just the Army

[PolskaUrban]

bam bam bam....kill the muslims KILL! KILL! KILL!

[digisage57]

it owns hands down the crews are trained better they slaugter those guys in 73 easting bmp is a turkey hands down just copy the bradley comrad haaa lol

[pimpfang1]

im not too sure how much ammo they have bacause i was in the 82nd airborne 2nd platoon but i used the m-16 a3 m203 but i did see bradleys alot i once did ask how much but i forgot it was in training that i asked but o well

[spunts144]

I wonder how much ammo goes into just training...

[USFCARTWRIGHT]

a lot. why do you ask.?

[cory8791]

how much ammo do they have on them?

[eggysrun]

Around 800 rounds on the coax (7.62mm) and 300 (270 HE/ 70AP) 25mm. That's inside ready to fire. Additional ammo varies on unit SOP or crew preference.

[mousehunter311]

the cfv (cavalry fighting vehicle, basically the cavalry's version on the infantry fighting vehicle) caries 1200 rounds of 25mm, but can only transport 3 troops.

[SomRoxofAOT]

I LOVE the first shot - "Wow!"

[ltcurry]

IZ erevy one here,amrika dubm if face forcel of 10 ig givz up. we strong bear as/

diz u wonderz wy russian harware combat fale? iz sunds smarez on paig.

[ECWUSA1995]

the audios off a little

[bbwbb2]

sounded like the gunner, or the BC got a z pattern in with the 240 coax.

[BL3000]

Seriously russian stuff was awesome like 40-50years ago but let's face it they don't have the money to keep up with the west anymore. Yeah it's true that they've built new weapons that are better than some of the western stuff but they only produce insignificant amount of them.

[00Shinkar00]

only with they got russia today( and i not refere in SOVIET TIMES) in ARMORED, MECHANIZED infantry ,and airbrone mechanized forces, they can erase any groun force,in europe, to that times you got the same argument like in cold war? russian weapons are proved best functionary tahntn west weapons,you can see old AK47,dirty in sand,can shot and kill and defeat body armor,US M´s need clean before a single shot!

the best US weapons are MARKETING,for "real war" are russian weapons.

[masedama]

as far as i can tell, you never won a single war by yourselves the last century..

[TheGreatestVids]

The Pacific and Gulf war asshole.

[00Shinkar00]

pacific?

read about 1.000.000?¿ japanese troops in corea and manchuko,the bigest troops of Japan empire, US, dnt wont defeat the last forces, and dont wont invade Japan, becouse dnt can asimilate big losses in that operations, that are the reason for hiroshima and nagasaki.Soviets and Zukov exterminate the bigest and central trops of JAPANS empire.

I really wont see an americans won war against enemi in equal conditions, Vietnam? 500.000 US trops!!!!!!

[TheGreatestVids]

Know your history idiot, If the Americans Invade and defeat the forces in Japan, it would surely result to an unconditional surrender.The Us didn't give a fuck about the troops in korea and manchuko, they were stuck there and those places has no strategic importance what so ever. Again know ur history Japan was on the verge of surrendering anyways, so why did they chose to detonate. 2 reasons, They wanted to see the effect, and to mark they're power into the world, especially to the soviets.

[4thinfantry112]

@TheGreatestVids No you dipshit, we didn't see the need to lose anymore of our people when we could just drop a couple nukes. Japan shouldn't have started a war it couldn't win.

[TheGreatestVids]

Vietnam?? don't make me laugh, as I said know your history, Militarilly the U,s forces never lost a single key battle in Vietnam. Vietnam was a political loss more than a military collapse. Think about it if America lost Vietnam militarily we would all be speaking Russian by now.

[TheGreatestVids]

"I really wont see an americans won war against enemi in equal conditions"

Gulf war, In most conflcit cases the Us army were outnumbered 3 to 1 and they came out victorious evrytime.

[00Shinkar00]

YES haha, irak got a poooowerfull air army, WITH AWACS, AND ECM suport!!! armed with obsolete T72,and export models. and Migs29 export,with untrained crew,and with out modern russian misiles, that are your win! USA only got the best propaganda, not the best weapons,

[TheGreatestVids]

They had the 4th largest tank force in the world at the time, they're T72's outnumbered the M1 abrams 3 to 1. What they lack in quality they have in quantity. Untrained crew for their mig 29's? Um no.. the Iraq Air force actually kept their migs in tip top shape since its their only fighter that can actually match up with the usaf.They also only issued they're top ace pilots to fly the migs .Saying that Iraq discarded theyre only advantage in the air war is a pure blasphemy itself.

[00Shinkar00]

study forces, in gulf, irak, afganistan, etc and compare,what you talk abaut! US allwais got 2 to one more aicraft, etc etc, never in equal conditions!!!

[TheGreatestVids]

Well your partly right and partly wrong at this one. Well yes obviously the Us will always have 2 to 1 more aircraft theyre enemies, since they are the the most powerful air force in the world, this has always been the us' spearhead of any attack. Never in equal conditions? Think not, in Vietnam the Usaf was outnumbered 2 to 1 in the skies with some migs piloted by soviet aces, yet they gained superiority. In NK they were outnumbered on a staggering 5 to 1 and yet they maintained air superiority

[seka1986]

Winning wars is based on having unequal conditions.

[fipfapfallywap]

@TheGreatestVids

Reason: Technology.

But i highly doubt your stat is accurate.

[RedPower012]

@TheGreatestVids 3 to 1 in what? Heh the USA outnumbered the enemy 3 to 1 in tanks and a couple of thousand to zero aircraft during most of the campaign. It was all about air superiority in Desert Storm and the Iraqis simply did not have the numbers or the quality fo aircraft.

[Konaboy7]

@RedPower012

....well, if you make up your own facts, I guess you're correct.

War is not fair, nor should it ever be. End of story.

[julian111993]

@TheGreatestVids in most wars america had to fight against hostile inhabitants, like vietnam oder now afghanistan.

guerillia warfare is much harder and more dangerous then "normal" war

1. because you have now idea whos civilian and whos soldier

2. they now their country much better und are able to place airsftrikes and ambushes far better

3. even if you do have a clear line to define soldier and civilian its almost impossible to get the civilians as your allies

[dktnt]

@TheGreatestVids Numbers do not mean as much as they did until modern wars... US army may be outnumbered but it has technological resources to compansate for the lack of numbers.

[CORWERA]

@TheGreatestVids how was the gulf war equal conditions?

[CaptainAmerica322]

.............panama, Grenada, small wars, but both victoruie and no one has ever won a major war by themselves. WW1, WW2, Korea, Gulf War, all allied, coalition, whatever. band of nations working together. wars arnt won by single countries, nor are they fought between single countries. Wars are fought by teams.

[frisbeesman]

not isreal they take on multiple countries aat once with no allied force

[diveit]

the states back them up. frisbeebitch.

[sisutrucks]

but dont forgett that the usa is way behind eirope in weapones tech.

[NYCSKATER12]

thats nottrue america has the best military in the world and alot of european stuff is influenced by american weapons.

[sisutrucks]

america got good stuff too, but they use alot of crap like the abrams and the bradley who is sub standard in todays world. and they use much european weapons and ammo like the one thing that is good on the abrams, the gun.

[NYCSKATER12]

actually the abrams is one of the best tanks in the world

[sisutrucks]

it have the old version of the gun, a very bad engine and is lost in iraq in pleny off numbers. its good, but far from the best.

[Anarkyfox7]

backwards. american stuff is "mostly" inspire from european things. took technology from the V2 rocket to get to the moon. and as for "best military in the world". it might be, i'm not judging. but every country on the planet says their own military is the best in the world.

[NYCSKATER12]

with aamerica being the wealthiest country in the world i feel we have the best military and allies as well

[Anarkyfox7]

Im not sure if im correct on this, but ive heard the US is in a sort of financial crisis. not to mention you owe china trillions.

[NYCSKATER12]

similar crisis is going on all over the world not just america right now

[Anarkyfox7]

lol you got that right.

[TomVonSlayer]

Funny that the rest of the world is in the crisis BECAUSE of america

Atleast because of the crisis in america

which i believe was simply caused by american consumer lifestyle

[DTBroad]

And the Germans would not have created the V2 without using the technology that Robert Goddard "An American," created when he invented the first liquid fueled rocket in 1926. And he would not have invented that if it were not for someone in China in the 13th century inventing the solid fuel rocket. Every country takes existing technology from all over the world and it comes up with its own products.

[DTBroad]

Your comment on how people always say their countries military is the best in the world is true. If you talk to a real person in any military or veteran "and I am one," they will tell you that they have "one of the best," or "one of the top," services in the world. Being proud of your countries military is a good thing, but to say you are the best in the world is an arrogant statement. Several European countries have made this mistake in the past.

[DTBroad]

England made this mistake about 200 years ago when they took advantage of some colonies they had in the west and decided to impose ridiculous rules and taxes on the colonies without equal representation in their government from the colonies. Because they had the attitude "What can they do, they are just a bunch of colonist and we have the best army in the world. If they appose us we will just crush them into submission. Well we all know how that turned out.

[DTBroad]

I think Germany and a few other countries from Europe,and Asia made the same mistake about a half century ago. That they could take on the rest of the world because they were the best and the rest of the world and its' people were sub par. But we won't go into that. My point is, Have pride in your country and it attributes, but not arrogance. And that is for everyone be he European or North American or any region or country.

[Anarkyfox7]

thats the first time ive seen a youtube comment with some sence. its surprising how often you see an american citizen and a UK citizen arguing for 10 pages about polotics and military power.

[Jacquinot1982]

Bradely is a garbage! BMP1 or BTR70 better

[Leopardipzg]

lol you don't know what you're talking about.

[00Shinkar00]

OFF course!!! the BMP3 or BMP2 is far superior to Bradley!!!

[desertstorm1989]

You wish and of course its got to get past the A10's and M1A2's

[00Shinkar00]

why you compare an ANTI tank CAS AIRCRAFT, and MBT, against ifv??

but......BMP3 and BMP2 got antiaircraft capacity,with they 30mm canons can destroy a single A10, and off course BMPs got ATGM, it is posible tehy can destroy or disabled an one M1A2

[desertstorm1989]

U do know in desert storm the bradely got more tank kills than the abrams and thats a fact.

[kwest317]

you are a fucking moron, and you're ignorant. The A-10 has a titanium "tub" around the pilot which can withstand 37mm rounds. bmp's are fucking CRAP - nice job w/those in afghanistan...u don't see bradleys blown away by rpg's like ur shitty bmp's were - douche bag!

[00Shinkar00]

motherfuckerSTOP INSULT IGNORANT COWBOY...

1st stupid,only the pilot are protected?well ?stupid?not all of aircraft has made in titanium!you copy?and they are protected from 20mm not from 37mm!!Billy Joe!we can see you are stupid and ignorant, read more ,about losses in irak and they causes,you got a lot of models of RPG,s and munitions ,BRATLEY is a piece of shit,in´80US try made a conterpartof the 1st BMP made in´60,with greatproblems of design, and far less of functionary,Big piece of shit

[stg44rulz]

actually the a-10 is protected against up to 23mm rounds

[00Shinkar00]

stop talk stupidities and invent information billy joe!

[ECWUSA1995]

lol quire bag

[stg44rulz]

Don't you have a life? If you do, you need to live it instead of puting anti american bullshit

on american videos! ok? And you need to grow up!

[00Shinkar00]

well, i dnt got problems with american propaganda meapons!, but only call for information, and for stop dreams about US weapons,

[protfl]

get past buratino.

[gervart]

can anybody help me, i am looking for any pictures or videos of the gunner seat of a bradley fv for an animated film i am going to make? please reply to my comment if you can help

[Kopcokolis]

The BMP-3 uses 4 types of weaponry:100mm Gun(A/P use),30mm coax cannon(A/T and A/P use),3x7.62 mg s(1 coax),The 100mm Gun launchs long range A/T guided missile,equal to TOW.Both IFVs wouldn t stop 0,50 cal unless it s very long range shot.Both have no hope stopping 25-30mm APDS rounds no need to talk abt missiles.Bradley is more friendly to user while BMP-3 is more fast and amfibius!Both are among the best of the world!IT S ALL ABT THE CREW TRAINING!!!!

[Dudtz]

The BMP-3 can stop 30mm rounds in the front.

[Kopcokolis]

There is no chance stopping 30mm APDS,i seriusly doudt if it can stop 0,50.I ve seen 0,50 piercing 6 cm steel of M 24 tank armor.

[Dudtz]

The manufacturers claimed it can stop a 30 mm in the front.

The BMPs with Kontakt 5 can certainly stop a 30 mm.

[Kopcokolis]

Ah..am talking abt the standard version not upgraded ;-) Yes maybe with extra armor it can manage.

[Kopcokolis]

The piercing was achived with shot at abt 600-700 meters and trust me some went through even the angle of attack was like 45 degrees

[BFVBC]

The BMP-3 has a punch yes but that vehicle is Russian made and is way over rated. A good Bradley crew can do short work to any enemy IFV on the battlefield bar none. Anything built by the Russians, especially their IFV's are exactly that, garbage.

[wartmcbeighn]

A good bradley crew could watch the shots from its 25mm cannon bounce off he armour of the BMP-3 just before he BMp-3 fires its 100mm main gun, or the coaxial 30mm gun chewing through the weak aluminum armour that the Bradley posses.

[stg44rulz]

no cause the bradley would use a tow missle and destroy it

[Boinkmakr]

Russian Apcs armor could barely take 50cal rounds what makes you think that the Bmp3 wont stop 25mm ap rounds or the tow

[wartmcbeighn]

The Tow would go thourhg..duh. The 25mm cannon, not a hope

[MarNick82]

Actualy, That 25mm round pierce the BMP3 armor like paper in any place from 2km distance.

[wartmcbeighn]

Depends where you hit something doesnt it, in the flank, more than likely, in teh front..not very

[Kopcokolis]

not at 2 Km

[luckyhat4]

It's fourteen feet tall and the armor is actually just aluminium. yeah, I'd rather not.

[criticalpass]

actually it's 11ft tall and I witnessed a T-72 round get deflected off the front engine mount of one in the first gulf war. Alum or not,that crew walked away from soviet's main battle tank.

[luckyhat4]

The only problem with that is that the Iraqis don't use tanks anymore--they use IEDs. And aluminum is not going to stop a few kilograms of shaped charge explosive, especially if its under your APC.

[Kopcokolis]

deflecting a round can happen anytime it says nothing!And T-72 is not a Main Battle Tank any more....try it with Leo 2-chalenger-T-80 and u things will be tough,for any APC anyways!

[kgwisgod]

Yeah, I'd rather not myself but you can't call the shots when you're cruising down some Iraqi street. The good news is that the bradley is tough as nails and can take a beating, then turn around and kill motherfuckers. I know.

[haszK]

HOOOOAHHHH!!!!

[bittemeinrammstein]

i like the BMP-3 way better! but the M2A2 is still a pretty sweet vehicle

[stg44rulz]

hey why are you on here when you wrote in you're profile america's military is a joke monkey infested piece of crap?

[tkktkt]

how many rounds of 25mm does the typical bradley tout around?