Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (188)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I happen to be the owner of a venture capital firm that would gladly invest 1.3 billion dollars in this project, who can I get in touch with?

  • I may be plain stupid, but I do not see, how turning in tighter circles at higher speeds (due to thrust vectoring) would lessen the G load on the pilot.

    The G load comes from the acceleration as th plane switches direction at a speed. If the time spent to turn is less, then the G load should be higher...

  • Noob '' MAYA '' music -.-

  • this is no more stealthy than my grandmothers shopping cart.

  • get a grip on the eggs boys...this stuff here is SOO conventional. Ho hum. Airflow?

    Hahahahah. I like the machines that don't worry about airflow. Know what I mean? Even nuclear engines were in OUR craft out in the Nellis/Tonopah desert. We been the conventional route. You young folks born after 1980 just may find yourselves doing business elsewhere...and I don't mean China either, if you get my drift. We are there. Demand nothing less! Gravity Drive is your present and future!!!!

  • Oh..oh..someone needs to practice more..

  • 6:21 will not the air resistance rip the hole shit apart? o.0

  • Why do people put this BS up.

  • love the fact you stole the wing design from a stealth plane design that was supposed to use micro control surfaces controlled by conducting electricity in them, thus adding drag where it is needed for control, it was featured in a local (finnish) science magazine called tieteen kuvalehti years and years ago, and the sources for the story were even older. And yes the wing design is faulty in speeds over mach 1 if you couple with that much turbulence creating fins, there is a reason for it.

  • Scooby dooby doo

  • So what game is this video from? It looks some what old I think I played it on the PS2 I just cant think of the title?! To add a little power to my statement I am in college majoring in aerospace and electrical engineering, and a minoring in physics.

  • gayest music ever, you faggot.

  • @Zooligable you are faggot if u dont understand the music... the track is a sanskrit language verse which says... ASTOMA JYOTIRGAMAYA.. VIDYORMA AMRUTAM GAMAYa translating to "from the darkness of fear and misunderstanding take me to the enlightened light of knowledge. Take me away from death , take me away from dillusion.provide me the truth. Sanskirt is the mother of all European and Asian languages. Watch your words f**ker

  • isn't this "simulation" the game Rigs of Rods?

  • so what we got jets that fly too the moon in Canada.

  • GOOGLE EARTH !!! *FG

  • It's not as good as my helicoipter I got from Futurshop!

  • I don't care if you think democracy is another idea good on paper and not in practice or not, simple fact remains, that democracy puts the most power in the peoples hands then any other form of government system were the people (Who are ignorant in matters outside their walls) do not have total control. The statement I started was simply stating I rather the U.S. or it allies have these weapons then anyone else in this small blue marble in space.

  • By Questionable governments I mean things like nations that are fanatical, which literally means they will end up killing anything outside their belief within seconds of manifesting a weapon, or Totalitarian government where if the leader suffers brain damage the people still follow blindly and is a volatile, unpredictable nation.

    Conspiracies aside, the Government system of Democracy, whether perfect or not, is the best system to hold to weapons of incredible power over the given examples.

  • The fastest they go, the highest they fly... the harder they will crash. Use funds, science and imagination for peace not for destructive weapons.

  • I apollogize, I meant to also say this is a cool project you did!! :)

  • I have to ask and it may just be that the computer is not rendering it but why are the canards not holding a stable parallel to the ground during the low speed high alph demo? I am in no way an expert in any of this but do know that the canards are what hold the stability of the alpha and lift to prevent stall. Just wondering if it was just a rendering issue or it is meant to be that way???

  • fake

  • FINAL FANTASY!!! KKKkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkk

  • amazing aircraft, X-Plane everywhere ;) I wonder about how deep the study you conducted on the design goes. High angle of attack maneuvers could cause the intakes to stall and end up in engine´s destruction. Another thing I would like to ask you about is the characteristics of your aircraft, flight envelope, mission profiles, ascent rate, range, etc.

  • Is this song from the Matrix?

  • good song

  • oops! you're not an engineer. fail

  • @puddingfoot try doing this yourself then..

  • пизда вам

  • can u give me the link for this plane?! plz

    looks like its x-plane.. am i right??

  • Your elevators will not work above Mach 1 due to the turbulence over the flight surfaces..... You should take some fluid dynamics courses and maybe put a little thought into how things work.

  • @LegereBen

    well i thought i had some aero dynamics courses in my eduqation but i might be wrong since your are clearlly the expert here! one thing.. think about the concorde Why jump into conclusions if you dont know the methode of control and the level of participation of the tail, flaperons, and canards. There is absolutely no problem with this type of airfoil in this configuration with the combined flaperon, tail and canards configuration to work properly above mach 1.

  • @mountainLeader001 Where did you download this program because I was really interested

  • @mountainLeader001 He has an airfoil directing the air right over the control surfaces dipshit. What grade are you in, kindergarten? Go take your nap lil boy.

  • @BiccusD Oh, and can you say F22 Raptor?!? lmao

  • Comment removed

  • @LegereBen

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA ARE YOU STUPID?

    How the hell would a jet fly if control surfaces couldn't work past Mach 1?

  • @LegereBen What you mean by elevators i took fluid mechanics but that was in college

  • @LegereBen lmao thats kinda bullshit ur sayin elevators dont work at 700mph on a plane :L so why do all the worlds modern jet fighters manage to fly ?? O_o :L

  • @LegereBen it also depends ow much force your hydrolics system can produce to move the elevators against the air.

  • @davetonia1233 The elevators may move just fine, but the airflow over the surface will lose it's effect with increased airspeed. There is a reason that modern aircraft that fly above mach 1 have one piece elevators. I'm just stating facts. Even with canards it will still be an unstable platform with excessive surface area and drag. It would make a great low speed fighter though.

  • @LegereBen don't know much about canards do you....

  • so u can fly this or make it a UCAV

  • it looks exactly like the x 32 in janes fighters anthology

  • You must kill for peace. Some world we live in, eh?

  • the F-22 would kick that things ass

  • this is good song to play when your taking a huge shit.

  • Very cool design but if you want stealth, check YF 23 Black Widow. This has too many control surfaces on the rear situadet on different "planes" making too many "cavitation angles", therefore the radio waves are bounced back to the enemy radar instead of being deflected elsewere

  • A soldier has no say in whether or not they will go to war, that's up to the politicians who don't think they have to live with the consequences. Sun-Tzu described the battlefield as: "The ground of life and death." Not only the fate of the armies fighting is decided by battles, but also the fates of nations, and even civilizations.

    Show me a soldier who enjoys being shot at, I will show you a Section 8 discharge canidate. They fight because they believe our civiliation is worth protecting.

  • Would it be stealthy?

  • Clipp is absolute winning : ) Cool music and great plane : ) nice job : ))

  • Inspired by the Swedish fpl37 Viggen I see :)

  • fake

  • the X-37 launches in 31 days space flight.

  • I see, the U.S. Air Force wants to test dual Independent AI-Human piloting with this craft. They are going to start testing it without a crew, it could be the first full size aircraft flowned by remote control. If succesful it could replace the need for pilots in some missions. Was not there a movie about a computer plane coing rogue with some B-movie stars trying to stop it from attacking DC?.

  • "Stealth" was the name of the film i think ... and i believe it was going to attack Russia and start a Nuclear war is succeeded, and all it took was a couple of humans to sort it out. lol

  • @56LC

    independence day?

  • aw whatever the otter bush plan can also shoot it down if it carried any missiles.lol.lol..

  • A harrier jump jet would knock it out of the sky in seconds and the pilot wouldn't even see it coming.

  • a bug eye with microchip can still shoot it down.

  • Outdated tech.

    What is the songs name?

  • it's Matrix soundtrack

  • @Space0wl shit on a shingle by conrade burpee

  • fak ya mama

  • Unless it plugs in to your brain it ain't got nuthin'

  • @AliasUndercover it isnt Macross Plus lol

  • I long for the enlightenment of those who worship war.

  • if i punch you square in the nose would you respond with your own fist or ask me why i did it and see if you can talk it out? while you are trying to speak i will continue punching. you too will worship war at that point.

  • It's more like this...I own a weapons factory, and I convince you that you are under a threat...there is no threat...but if I convince you that there is....I sell more weapons.

  • You wouldn't understand.

  • see nytech,

    JOAPY agrees with me... you wouldn't understand.

  • How idealistic of you.. I can assure you the one's who have to fight in wars will be the last one's wanting to fight or kill another being if equipped with sufficient brainpower, memory, sanity, morality and integrity... So that makes a lot of people dumb, stupid, retarded, insane, immoral lying bastards!!!! especially the ones deciding where and when to unleash a war!!! and that makes us again very guilty because we choose these bastards to govern us... how fucking stupid is this!!!

  • I'm goin for my second deployment to that sandbox and trust me, I wouldn't want to kill, but if I have to I will.

  • That is the one and only true attitude

  • @mountainLeader001 Very true, video games make it easy to kill but real life is different, very different.

  • @yellowmetalcyborg Situations your put into make it easier... especially when faced with the question of your buddies life as well as your own or the life of your aggressor. But, there are a number of folks that look forward to it and then end up wondering why they did.

  • @adsensus END WAR NOW!

  • @yellowmetalcyborg War has its place in todays world. Simply demanding its end is rather ignorant of you. Maybe focus your capital letter efforts towards something more realistic, like ways to people together, stop corruption, end lobbyist influence, rigged elections, shady banks, hidden agendas, world hunger, rape of fossil fuels, oppression... I think you get the idea. Until we take a serious look at these issues armed conflict will continue to be a viable solution, period.

  • @adsensus I know that it's unrealistic to eliminate war, war is part of human nature it would just be great if you could end war anyway, do you know how many good lives have ended because of senseless war? Take a look at the war in Vietnam, and the war in Iraq and la guerre de cent ans in Europe and of course ww1 and 2.

  • @yellowmetalcyborg True, only reason i got on you in the first place is im tired of all the anti-war protests i see happening in my area... Signs of "PEACE NOW" "END WAR" "LEAVE AFGAN" and the like. Yet not one sign among the many with a viable solution or at the very least, a proposed solution. Politicians, in my opinion, tend to view these angry mobs and ignorant fools who dont understand the situation and thus dont take their stance seriously. My two cents anyway.

  • @JOAPY why go?

  • This is just a 3D render. what does this explain?

  • @smujismuj To worship war is one thing then to understand it's necessity... you know this right? If you know there will be someone willing to kill you, wouldn't you want to have the better weapons to make sure they never get the chance. Better to have the best then to allow someone who potentially will use it recklessly have it... don't you agree?

  • @Peacekeeper2403

    Who is threatening the u.s.?

    If you think we got the full story on 9/11, you need to take another look.

    ae911truth . org

    firefightersfor911truth . org

    stj911 . org

    pilotsfor911truth . org

  • @smujismuj I'm not going to get into another 911 truth debate, here nor anywhere else ok. I'm simply stating two Options. 1: A nation with a good system in place (Doesn't matter if it's imperfect) having super weapons or 2: A nation with a system that begs for the literal annihilation of everyone other then themselves having the weapon.

    The U.S. and it's allies or similar nations are the best fit to hold to these weapons whether they are 100% perfect or not vs the questionable governments.

  • @Peacekeeper2403

    What if we're the bad guys?

    Nicaragua, Panama, Chile, Columbia, Philippines, Haiti, Viet Nam, Cambodia...shall I continue?

    I shall: El Salvador, Argentina, Venezuela, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan....

    Back when most of these 'actions' took place, the u.s. govt. and military denied them.

    Thanks to FOIA we now know that we haven't always played fair much less nice.

    I wouldn't agree to becoming defenseless either, but that's hardly the case now, is it?

  • @smujismuj Go live in cuba for a day and tell me then what you think of the United States, go live in any of those places. You don't have to sit here and argue we maybe the bad guys, just expose yourself to the real life of daily life under any other government that's not similar to Democracy, it doesn't matter if we didn't play nice I never said about a perfect system but hell Democracy is as good as it gets. Know why, Cause without it You wouldn't be able to say the things you are saying now.

  • @Peacekeeper2403

    We don't live in a democracy in the u.s.

    It's not even a republic.

    You think voting every couple of years gives you any real say in how things are?

    Who do you get to vote for? How are they selected?

    And you're right, I wouldn't want to live in any of the countries I mentioned because the u.s. and it's allies have plundered them & established dictatorships that allow private interests to use the local populations as slave labor. Wake up and smell the fascism, state+corporate.

  • @smujismuj That's fine we all have the right to believe what we want. You are set on those ideas based on your... "facts" and I'm set in my ideas, based on my... "facts" in the end no one is here to set the law down. I feel bad for you feeling the world is more complicated and filled with little hope then I feel it really is. Ones own experiences are dictators of our own belief and you have a different one from mine, I just hope we both keep it from forcing others from choosing their own belief.

  • @smujismuj I don't care to sit here and argue the rights and wrongs of the U.S. I admit the US isn't perfect and has stuck their business in places they shouldn't but heck it's better then dropping nukes every square inch of land for saying U.S. stinks. USSR had nukes in their tank shells ready for a fight with the U.S. anyone in that government sneezed without the government wanting you to and your head was cut off, speak free here rant all you want cause your lucky we live in a democracy buddy

  • @smujismuj And if you don't like how the U.S. is or how it works. Then get involved, cause all these politics are there because the people that rant like you, me and everyone else don't give 3 flying sh1ts about going to vote and when business men looking for the best interest of their company go to the poles they put their 2 cents into someone that will create more benefit for them. Then everyone that didn't vote start complaining about how unfair these politics are. Get involved simple

  • @Peacekeeper2403

    How do you know what I do, or how I get involved?

    How odd that you call yourself "Peacekeeper".

  • @smujismuj ..Truly it IS the peacefull who maintain the peace. everybody likes the excitement of war until themselves or soemone they care about is hurt by it. I dont worship war, but I do like finely tuned machines..its like artwork. so I guess im an art fan. And the military usually has some nice machines, but certainly not the most creative. It never hurts to know how to defend yourself though, wich is the root of an uncorrupted military force. However most seem corrupt. :-(

  • bad choice for leading edge slats

  • it's eather leading edge flap or slats... not both!!!! and yes you are right however i can't change everyting in x-plane,, this is what you get and if you dont like it you get the fuck out

  • where do you get this plane from

  • the music is: Juno Reactor - Navras

  • I designed a plane simmilar to this a few months back except it was STOVL

  • F22s are too buggy. Their capabilities may be impressive, but it's all worthless if they break down too often, as they do.

    It's a boondoggle, but the propaganda of success is keeping the F22 look as it's the best ever.

  • @7941series The more complex something is the more prone it is to complications right? The only way to get around it is to use it more often and see what kind of problems come from every situation and improve from there. I'm sure the first house, versus living in a cave, wasn't successful under all weather conditions. After much trial and error and even deaths housing improved. If you say oh settle with the lesser one it works more often you never have the best or get close to it.

  • Phallanx Dragon final design...

  • Not a bad plane. looks pretty damn cool

  • What is the music?

  • It's from matrix Revolution

  • sweet song ese what s it called XD

  • The Us military has many secrets

  • re do that, why the f22 is NO longer being purchased

  • It is, they are just reducing the number that there buying by about a 3rd.

  • lmao, with the F-22 being so pricey its no wonder they cut its production, but I believe its a Temporary measure until we are out of rough water. I believe that money is being put towards the Successor of the F-16A.

  • no dude the us gov stoped buying the f-22's because of president obama forced lockheed to stop the production of the raptors.

    to cause"world peace"

  • Wrong, they just reduced the number of F-22 produced to 185 from something like 300. They also increased the production of the F-35 to over 3000. I do print work for Lockheed and they produce the F-22 right down the road from my shop. I see new ones doing there test fights every week. One more thing this was all done during the Bush administration, Obama had nothing to do with it.

  • 3000 of F-35? i suppose that USA wants to sell the F-35 in other countries as they did with F-16, i know that because i am from Romania (don't ask), we must buy a new fleet of planes, F-16 its an option for us, USA gives us F-16 for free with only condition that after 15 years to buy F-35...i don't know if my information is right but that's what i heard

  • Thats 3000+ F-35 just for the US, but yes there are plans to produce this plane for sale to other country's. However the F-35 is going to be replacing all or most of are F15,16, and 18.

  • i thought that F15 will be replaced by F22

  • The F35 is replacing all of are air to air and air to ground fighter, except for the A10. The F22 is basically become air to air support to the F35. The F22's role was changed during the Bush administration when they came up with some new air combat strategy that has not yet been implanted. I got to see it in a documentary it involves F22, F35, and combat drones. It was kind of interesting.

  • can you tell me the name of that documentary please?

  • I saw it like last year or the begging of this year sometime. I'm sure it was on the Military Channel, and I think it was called Air Combat. Don't hold me to it tho it was more thin a few months back.

  • Do you have a channel about army? Nice..., above all USA can be proud about its war technique...By the way thanx, i will search for that documentary

  • Wish I could have been more help.

  • They did not want to sell the F-35 outside of the US but lockheed argued with them to let them export it, there is one condition to the agreement they made and that is only some of the variants will be exported. (plus some other arrangements)

    Got to remember the US Air force funded the F-35 project hoping it would be US only.

    And to answer a question made down the page the F-35 is not just replacing "one" aircraft, it is also replacing AV-8 harriers and more., it comes in many variants..

  • @HeeroYuy911 its also a giant shithacker that has cost far more than they thought. various countries are not happy with its performance.

  • @ScoundrelzNTwK But it also does perform better than a lot of aircraft's as well each country has there own needs or criteria for what they think is good.

    The F22 cost more than was expected but that is a god (US only), prob the most deadly or one of the most deadly jets in the sky.

  • are there plans for real prototypes or actual production of this design? spectacular design.

  • Is this your own design?

    TWO THUMBS UP!!!

    GOOD JOB, BUDDY... IT'S AWESOME!!!

    ^^

  • THANX!!!

  • Thanks verry much. I hope you enjoyed.

  • Like the plane, like the animation, like the modelling... Looks as if you've crossed Eurofighter Typhoon, YF-23 Black Widow and the F-35... Nice work.

  • Thanks for the nice comment

  • thats tripn me out with the thrust vectoring and the arabian flute tunes

  • Comment removed

  • Wich Film? don't remember any type of music like this in matrix

  • Comment removed

  • I believe that it's at the end and titles of Matrix: Revolution.

  • To be exact it must be indian flute.. i'd say keep on trippin on the thrust vectoring and de indian flute..thanx for your comment.. it is nice to here you liked it!!!

  • so is your mamma!!

  • the song is based on indian classical music and vedic scripts...

  • Great plane!! Great song!! Great game!! Great video!!

  • Thanks for your comment

  • dude i bet they already made these planes the government probably hasnt said shit about it

  • ya.... these r those ufo's

  • Maybe we are the government :)))

  • This isnt anything like your Microsoft Flight Simulator.First of all Microsoft Flight Sim sucks. This is much better than that. This is X-Plane simulator. And we didnt do anything about the weight of the plane. And if jou did this already than show us your plane.

  • piss off moron!! no microsoft on my pc!!!

  • What is the name of the song???

  • I'm not sure the name of the song but it from the matrix revolution soundtrack

  • ya,It's called "Navras" from Matrix

  • cool video game

  • oh...sorry...i saw the name of the song at the end...BTW...i like your video

  • nice video...can u tell me what is the name of the song?

  • sup do you no the name of da sond dat is playin???

  • It's either you didn't watch the whole video or you can't read.... At 07:49 you'll see Juno Reactor & Don Davis title NAVRAS

  • Name of the Song?

  • what is this a online game, what is the website? So cute!

  • No its a Simulation Game ( X- Plane ) This is the plane i designed and my brother developed it, so this is the result of it :)

  • dude stop making fool of yourself here... lol

  • Dear tancology I'm sure your smart but why just blame? Ik ga blowen superduberjointen, VRIEEEND.

  • ok veel plezier :)

  • I hope your not in service or something????

  • Hahaha Yo Bro How are you? What kind a stupid questions you have to awnser :) i realy had to laugh when i saw these comments. I know the awnser. why wont we remove only the brain and put it in the cockpit full of blood and it wil fly the airplane no matter what the G-Force is hahaha... Dude come onnnn be reasonable....Dont awnser such crazy questions Bro :)

  • I studied your blood thing and yeah its right.G-force is effecting nomatter what.

    If HUMANs could do antigravity like in space, inside jet would G-force still effect?

  • if someone would have come up with antigravity the planes wouldnt need any wings or jet enginesand could have any other shape. It would stop in and turn in a blink of an eye. Still not possible yet!!!

  • Antigravity planes are a dificult thing indeed. Howver, a lower power system could be used to mitigate g-forces for the pilot, allowing a manned aircraft to maneuver much more strongly. Something like that with lower performance requirements would most likely appear first. Also, another thought for a low power system might be to reposition sattelites without the need for fuel, allowing indefinite service life. Not too bad an idea considering repositioning sattelites needs less exertion.

  • I think we should just move away from the need of an onboard piliot.

  • Computers can carry out actions, but they can't make decisions. You need a human being in the cockpit. Fact is, it'll be a long time before anybody comes up with a computer that'll compare to the human brain.

  • with hypersonic automated aircraft there would be little need for arial dogfights because there would be no human piliots that could engage them effectively enough to demand that kind of critical thinking.

  • That's a hundred years away. Besides, such an aircraft would be worthless defensively against conventional fighters and bombers. Thats like trying to use an F-22 against a bunch of low flying Spitfires. Too much of a good thing.

  • I can imagine something what I can´t build in words.Sorry if I write stupid stuff.I see your point, Newton was crazy when he figured out these laws, maybe some crazy HUMAN(s) can solve out this problem. Blood thing would be cool but it´s not "loyal" erhm.I think.

  • I think the blood changing machine is too risky.

    Why is it so hard to make own gravity and floating system inside the machine? Mmmm...something like in submarines, the surrounding pressure is not effecting inside the submarine. It´s so hard to explain ( my cabularity isn´t that good) and maybe I say things wrong way, so U don´t get my point OR is it really so that HUMANS can´t build inside (fast going /manouvering) machine its own gravity kinda thing? I see its future somehow.

  • submarines don't go mach 1+ in the water moron