This is one of the most ignorant close minded videos I have ever seen in my life because it is actually serious. There are so many of these things more of them you can use on a conservative.
I'm not offended I just think this video is a ignorant broad generalization of people. Those who can't think for themselves yell generalizations to get attention.
@szeilea hate to dissapoint but no liberals are killing this country......but you conservatives love bombing the shit out of countries with brown people in them.....and then you go to church and once againpray to those white staues of Jesus......
@szeilea a conservative gay would quietly lead his life???? wow, what does that mean? he has to keep it in the closet so his gay bashing friends dont find out, because the white jesus will be pissed? how freakin ignorant, I mean conservative.
This is obviously made by a conservative who is trying to put down Liberals. I agree some liberals are really that way. But Its far from the truth. Conservatives dont like change. They want to stay pushing their Christain ways on everyone, hating others cause their different, especially liberals who can be the most peace offering of any, who defend other people and who have empathy for others that have to deal with bad circumstances. Cant say the same for a conservative who enjoys war.
@palmbebe86 very well said,Palmbebe.....you will find conservatives to be the most prejudice also.....but they go to church and pray to Jesus, of course the statues of Jesus all depict him as a white person.....
If a conservative doesn't like the foul language on a television program or conatained in music on the radio, he cries and whines until it is censored.
If a conservative doesn't believe in abortion he demands it be outlawed.
If a conservative doesn't believe in gay marriage he demands it be outlawed.
If a conservative is racist he will make up ludicrous claims about how the president is a muslim anti-christ from Kenya.
Other than being incredibly stereotypical! I think very few people agree completely with one side of the other and surely most people’s views are a mix of the two (Well they seem to be in the UK). Why do we feel the need to fit everyone into groups... it bemuses me.
Conservatives are full of fear? Who are the ones who've said that republicans want to starve children? And kill the elderly? And poison the water? And dirty our air? It was a liberal democrat who said on the house floor that the republicans want us to die because they were against the health care bill. Fear mongering is right out of the liberals' play book.
Wow, what a moron who made this and morons who follow it. Conservatives are full of fear and who are only in it for themselves. There is no community goal and no environmental concerns.
with the exceptions that by definition you can't be both conservative and a homosexual at the same time, one precludes the other, and if a liberal is homosexual they want more than just legislated respect, they want legislated extra privileges just because of their personal choice to be one!
Love this video. I saw a comment just before mine who is a tree hugging liberal and he obviously needs to stop listening to Obama because this video, everything in it is true. Well done.
I'm sorry......you seem to have the words around the wrong way...what you say for Conservatives is actually true for True Liberals, and what you say for Liberalism is actually true for True Conservatives. If what you say were true on this I would be a Conservative, I am not.I am a True Liberal and the fact that the truth is that if you reversed your comments to make them true would actually be the accurate version shows why I am Liberal and not a lying Conservative - there are other Tories too.
good job, this video proves that he doesn't understand what liberal is. Liberalism is the belief in the importance of liberty and equal rights. General examples include, supporting ideas such as constitutionalism, liberal democracy, free and fair elections, human rights, capitalism, and freedom of religion. - Source Unknown
A liberal won't forward it not because he's offended...but because its full of stupid platitudes. The sources are "unknown" because the author just made them up...a common practice for conservatives who don't like how real facts conflict with their worldview.
i am a liberal and i am not offended and i will forward this to all my friends... to show them ignorance in its purest form. i'm not calling you ignorant for your beliefs your beliefs are very valid and SHOULD be heard but the way in which you present them is biased. 1. not all liberals are exactly the same 2. a lot of the things you say about liberals aren't true. also to use the same logic: A conservative doesn't like abortion he decides to out law it. A liberal lets them make the choice.sorry
You should do more research of what a liberal actually is and it seems to me you must watch Fox news. Fox news has horrible journalism and it promotes bias through the syphering of political opinions. Many of the pundants on the show are to one side of the spectrum.
With regard to Benjamin Franklin, all one has to do is look up his speech at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 to see he makes clear his belief that God "governs the affairs of men," which rules him out being a deist (look up the word "deist" while you're educating yourself on Franklin). Although early in his life Franklin may have indeed been a deist. But he no doubt was a Christian as he got older (with age comes wisdeom:)
Here is my Creed: I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by his Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we can render to him, is doing Good to his other Children…. I think the System of Morals [devised by Jesus] and his Religion as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw, or is likely to see;
@RepRedify but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have with most of the present Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity.
- Ben Franlin, letter to ezra styles, Mar 9, 1790, not long before his death
Clearly, he believes in God and in Jesus' morality but not his divintiy. He can't be called a Christian.
@RepRedify Also, can you cite where Adams regretted his statement, cause the premise to it was that he wanted to scream it 20 times. My bad about Barlow, i accidently said adams wrote it, I meant his administration ratified it and supported, as did all of congress. It was published in newpapers a recieved no major objections. I can't find the text of the 2nd treaty. If your referring to the arabic version of the treaty it was more likely a slip-up that it didn't get in the treaty.
@iron100159 "Seventy years ago ... Lemuel Bryant was my parish priest, and Joseph Cleverly my Latin school master ... The parson and the pedagogue lived much together, and were eternally disputing about government and religion. One day when the school master had been more than commonly fanatical and declared "if he were a monarch, he would have but one religion in his dominions;" the parson coolly replied, "Cleverly, you would be the best man in he world if you had no religion!"
Continuing Adams' letter: "Twenty times in the course of my late reading have I been on the point of breaking out, 'This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!!!' But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell."
--Letter from Adams to Thos. Jefferson, April 19, 1817 (Jefferson wrote back agreeing, by the way).
Regarding the Treaty of Tripoli, you conveniently (again) leave what comes after your quote:
"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion AS IT HAS IN ITSELF NO CHARACTER OF ENMITY AGAINST THE LAWS, RELIGION OR TRANQUILITY OF MUSSLEMEN..." In other words the Christianity in America, they were telling the Muslims, was not the same type of Christianty on which the governments in Europe were founded.
In addition, why do you secularists on the Left never discuss other founders such as Rush, Jay, or Webster? Seems you always revolve around three people--usually Franklin, Jefferson, and Paine--and by and large you misquote and twist their words!
@RepRedify I won't deny Webster, Jay, Rush or Henry were strong Christians. However they don't stand up to Washington, Jefferson, Adams,etc. and the constitution. All you've added to the Adams quote is that Adams, though he thought religion was not good, was neccesary to keep a civil world. That doesn't make him a christian, that makes him practical.
@iron100159 lol, now you've subtly dragged in Mr. Washington, who once said that religion and morality were the two pillars of good government. Apparently, you also haven't read "John Adams," by McCullough. Adams never said he didn't think religion was good. In fact, he was one of the most devout Christians of all the founding fathers. And Washington's own step granddaughter said to question Washington's religion would be akin to questioning his patriotism.
@RepRedify Thats a pretty big assertion concenring Washington nearly stopped attended Church, though his wife sometimes brought him. she went regularly. When he did go, he refused the eucharist. He refused last rites upon his deathbed. his friend Dr.Abercrombie said shortly after "Sir, Washington was a deist." in a letter a Dr. Wilson who inquired about Washington's beliefs.
@iron10015 So you place a "friend" of Washington above his own grandchildren. How convenient. Apparently you haven't read "Sacred Fire," which delves deeplly into Washington's religious faith.
@RepRedify Adams was at best a unitarian. He wrote to Jefferson in Sept 1816 "I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved — the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced! With the rational respect that is due to it, knavish priests have added prostitutions of it, that fill or might fill the blackest and bloodiest pages of human history."
@RepRedify "Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind" - Adams, Defense of Constitutions of Government of the United States.
@RepRedify "It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses." - John Adams, A Defense of Constitutions of Government of the united States
@RepRedify Clearly Adams was suspicious of religion(some more than others) and while he thought a religious/moral population could make for a healthier democracy, he didn't propose it as the basis of America, but reason and sense rather than a heavenly power. He also didn't typically mention Christianity in a good light. He once called it a revelation, but followed up with saying that it was mostly myth though. Washington mentioned god plenty, but never Jesus.
@iron100159 "You do well to wish to lean our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are. Congress will do everything they can do assist you in this wise intention."
--George Washington, to the Delaware Indian Chiefs, June 12, 1779
I have never heard of Washington resfusing last rites on his deathbed. I speak as someone who minored in history in college. But I do know that it was Washington who began the practice of placing his hand on the Bible while taking the oath of office, and he went as far as to kiss the Bible afterward. Odd behavior for someone who didn't believe in Jesus.
@RepRedify Concerning the treaty, there's no indication that there was a distinction between 'European Christianity' and 'American Christianity.' Either way, Im pretty sure "no pretext arising from religious opinion" would apply to both. Its a secular treaty. You're asserting that the US told Llibya that the USA was secular though it was actually Christian(a lie)?
As I said, the treaty was largely to appease Muslims to stop their pirating of American ships. As Adams was known for keeping peace between America and France, his administration certainly didn not wish to start a two-bit war with Muslims.
@RepRedify In the treaty, the clause ended with "it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries." which shows the point was that the treaty was not to be interpreted by religious views. It didn't have anything to do with which country the religion came from. And if they saw their faith as seperate from Europe, why did they refer to it as THE christian religion?
@iron100159 The point of the treaty was to appease Muslim fanatics in Tripoli by declaring that the Christian religion as practiced in the United States was not the same Christian religion that they had fought in Europe. In other words, they were trying to find a way to shut them up so they would leave us alone.
You have no argument on this point, except that the Muslims would have read it as a religious holy war declaration (they're apt to do that) had America not clarified that it was not to be read as such. What's more, Americans believed their practice of Christianity was THE best practice of Christianity, not the practice the Muslims had come to know while fighting holy wars with Europe. This has already been sufficiently explained to you.
John Jay called Christianity as practiced in America "enlightened." John Adams called it "rational." Daniel Webster: "The ecclesiastical establishments of Europe which serve to support tyrannical governments are not the Christian religion but abuses and corruptions of it." He went on to declare that American Christianity was "Christianity to which the sword and fagot are unknown--general tolerant Christianity is the law of the land!" --Noah Webster, "History of the United States" pg 339.
Also, Daniel Webster, "Mr. Webster's Speech in Defence of the Christian Ministry and In Favor of the Religious Instruction of the Young. Delievered in the Supreme Court othe United States, February 10, 1844, in the case of Stephen Girard's Will" pg 52
As with so many liberals, you refuse to look at the intent of the founders, and would rather twist words and phrases. Tisk, tisk.
@RepRedify The Washington quote was a follow up to an agreement between congress and the indians. part 5 of it read: That the said Delaware Nation have established a Town where numbers of them have embraced Christianity under the Instruction of the Reverend and worthy Mr David Ziesberger whose honest zealous Labours & good Examples have Induced many of them to listen to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which has been a means of introducing considerable order, Regularity and love of Peace into the
@RepRedify Minds of the whole Nation—the[y] therefore hope Congress will countenance & promote the Mission of this Gentleman, so far as they may deem expedient; and they may rely that the Delaware Nation will afford every encouragement thereto in their Power." - written by a Christian frontiers group. ALthough the Indians had been inviting the missionaries. Washington was being friendly and agreeing that this would be productive for the indians, which i will get the quote for in a moment.
@RepRedify "I was a little at a loss what answer to give and could have wished they had made their first application there. But as an answer could not be avoided, I thought it safest to couch it in general but friendly terms and refer them to Congress for a more particular one. Though there is reason to believe, they have not adhered very scrupulously to their pretended friendship, it appeared to me to be our present policy at least to conciliate;
@RepRedify and in this spirit my answer was conceived. I hope I may not have deviated from the views of Congress. I send a copy of my answer." - George Washington, delegation to the Congress, May 12, 1779. Clearly, he was just being agreeing and encouraging though he wasn't representing Congress and suspected that this may not represent their views. For his inagguration, the bible was a last minute addition grabbed from a masonic lodge to settle any disputes over what denomaination to represent
lol. It doesn't matter whether the Bible was "grabbed" at the last minute. It was still used, upon Washington's insistance. Also, Washington was a Mason--further proving Washington's requirement for a Bible. You have slowly evolved from declaring Washington and the selected founders you have attacked were non-religious to arguing about the denomination of Christianity in which they believed, read their Bibles and such. I'm glad I have helped you along, but you must continue your education.
@RepRedify first. holy shit your fast! lol let me finish my emails before you answer. With Adams, I'm going to continue saying he's a deist or at best unitarian, neither of which are christian, and that Washinton was a deist. Being a mason means he must believe in God, although the Masons were generally pro-secular govt. and so were most classical liberals, a term that generally applies to our founders. The bible doesn't 100% win me over but it is a good point I'll admit.
@iron100159 I think our original debate was concerning if the USA was secular or not and we've branched out from there. But I'll still stand up it being secular. In regard to credentials, you've probably studied more history than I have generally but I kinda take to looking a lot of this stuff up as a hobby. Not quite as credable as a college coarse, but I'm not making stuff up. Its good to find someone I can have an intellectual conversation with on youtube... finally
@iron100159 I'm not that fast. I always check my emails before heading off to work. But with regard to Adams: "The general principles on which the founders achieved independence were ... the general principles of Christianity ,,, Now I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God..." Letter to Jefferson, June 28, 1813
I confess I don't know very much about the Masons. But it seems that many secularists make the mistake of believing the founders must refer specifically to Jesus every time they speak of Christianity (and many did). I am a strong Christian, though I am not a churchgoer, nor can I remember the last time I specifically proclaimed Jesus as my savior. But He is, and I--like the founders--make the assumption that people understand that when speak of Christianity that includes the belief in Jesus.
@RepRedify He also didn't plan the ceremony himself, though he may have used this sort of bible in masonic ceremonies in DC. As far as the treaty goes, we're going no where with it. You seem to think the US told Libya we were a different christianity that wasn't pointed out in the treaty. I just don't see it. I'm not arguing that many Americans thought America practiced a better Christianity than Europe, but that wasn't referneced in the treaty. Webster and Jay included.
@RepRedify Jay was fairly important, but Webster not so much. I can't find that speech on the internet anywhere so I'll have to get back to that point at some other time. sorry. One thing I just remember concenrning the bible. Not fairly important but one president in the 19th century,(I don't remember which off of the top of my head) swore on a law book rather than any religious book. This may not PROVE, but definitely supports that the country is not based off of religion.
@12salem well what you said then is a lie, because liberals cant tell the truth nor comprehend factual statements like this one. so even if you told the truth saying the conservatives do not lie, in your own head you would still be lying lmao. I apologize though because liberalism is a mental disorder :(.
if you are non-religious, then you are perfectly capable of sustaining the american dream. but make sure to recognize our country as based off of christianity. religion had always been in our country until the progressive movement, which makes sure to recognize our country as secular. just because you can worship whatever you want here does not make it secular. we are, rather, we were, a christian nation, and nobody cared. no one complained about reading bibles in school.its part of US culture.
@fatty1443 Really? Because many of the founding fathers were deists. And how often does it mention God in the constitution. The only time it mentions religion is that it is separate from govt and can be chosen. If your not convinced, then tell me, which branch of christianity are we. Catholic? Evangelical? Episcopalien? Does mormonism count? After all it is centered around America and was founded in America.
@iron100159 First, point to the words "separation of church and state" in the Constitution. You can't because they're not there. Second, your ignorance of our founding fathers is comical. Of the founders, only Thomas Jefferson and perhaps Thomas Paine could legitimately be called "deists." But even Jefferson called himself a "Christian." Lastly, the First Amendment simply means that the Congress cannot establish an official national religion. End of story. Bibles in school, etc. are fine.
@RepRedify The 'wall of seperation is nickname' that Jefferson and Madison made up for atricles 6 and the first amendment.If you wanna be that guy that says just because it does not specifically mention religion in the const. then we must be a Christian nation, then check out what Adams wrote in the treaty of tripoli"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." Sorry but America was founded as a secular nation.
@RepRedify "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it." - John Adams, quoted from Charles Francis Adams, ed, Works of John Adams 1856, vol X, p. 254
"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation." - Treaty of tripoli, voted in uniaminously by the senate
Washington rarely went to church. He occasionaly went with his wife to an episcopalian church and when he did, he refused the eucharist. I have more for l8r.
@iron100159 My, my we don't know our history. Joel Barlow stuck the language into the Treaty of Tripoli, not John Adams. In fact, when the treaty was re-ratified a few years later, that language was removed. You conveniently fail to mention that. Washington's own peers and soldiers vouch for his strong Christian faith--it was Washington who REQUIRED them to attend church on Sundays. Their testimony outweighs your opinion. John Adams later said he regretted making the statement you alude to
Jesus was conservative--hes pro-life. in fact, i can make any joke slamming liberals at my catholic church, and not have to worry because we are true christians, that go to church every sunday because we put God first. and secondly, we dont try to cram religion down your throat. our country was based on judeo-christian values--values we wouldnt have if our founding fathers were atheist. our laws are base off the ten commandments. thats a fact.
Of course a conservative would get a good laugh. :P this is 100% bias. And I wouldn't consider myself either, but I certainly don't agree with a video that can't point out conservative flaws as well.
If a Conservative is a victim of gun violence he campaigns for more gun rights so that he may shoot back
If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host he whines about the Liberal Bias in the media
If a Conservative believes in God he tries to establish his own religion above all others
If a Conservative sees this comment he'll be offended and maybe consider that you can't make blanket statements criticizing others deeply held beliefs without offending them.
clearly someone who has a fox news or rush limbaugh view of liberals & has no clue what a liberal actually is. most of this video is wrong or an outright lie
I'm a liberal in most senses of that word, and I forwarded this to my friends to get a good laugh out of it too. Mosty because what it says is bullshit, which I can partially prove with just one example: what about all the arrogant conservatives who stand outside of Planned Parenthood offices and harass the women going inside? That seems to me to be a little bit invasive upon others, does it not?
Conservatives want to shove religion down my throat,I can't tolerate them for that alone.Leave it in churches and out of schools,court houses and such.Leave me alone with that stuff,I want no part of it yet I'm continually bombarded by it.Creationism in schools?Based on what facts?And which branch of Christianity would win that fight?Nah,I want no part of conservatives and their protection of the wealthy.It's laughable they even claim to be Christians,I think Christ would be unhappy with them.
@SteinUndStahl666 Ohhh, you're atheist. That's even worse. You don't even have religious bullshit to hide behind, you just have to come right out and admit you're a piece of shit human being with no concern for your fellow man. And anti-LGBT is a purely religious concept. It doesn't matter if you claim to be "atheist" if you just jump right in the flock with the rest of the religious sheep. Fail human being is fail.
lol, wow. By the way you talk, you must be pretty young.
Anti-LGBT is not "purely religious" at all. There are plenty of people against homosexuality for social and economic reasons, not religious ones. France, Estonia, and the Czech Republic are perhaps the three least religious countries in the world, and gay marriage is illegal in all three.
As for me jumping in the flock, that's silly. If I was a follower, wouldn't I believe in what the majority of Conservatives believe?
@SteinUndStahl666 Social and economic reasons? So let me get this straight, you want a segment of the population to remain marginalized and unequal because you think society as a whole would benefit? That's not humane. Also, allowing marriage equality stimulates the economy with more weddings and benefits society by allowing same-sex couples to create and maintain strong families. So what were those social and economic reasons you were blithering about?
I think both Conservatives and Liberals are STUPID IDIOTS with the Cons coming number 1 in that category and Libs coming in a close 2nd........A con would see this and say "YAY WE BEAT THEM AGAIN" LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! thumbs up for the vid though 0:53 is funnny, especially because this vid is supposed to offend them...what a set up LOL
Lol this video is so rediculous! Sure it's worded funny, but it doesn't describe conservatives any way near the truth. Conservatives are just as loud and obnoxious as liberals, if not more.
The economy must grow gracefully, like a tree. A tree follows the golden ratio as it grows horizontally and vertically towards the sun.
The American economy must balance horizontal (tradition) with vertical (new growth).
For example, traditional small businesses must be maintained as new industries surface.
To suppress new growth (ultra conservative) is to create a bonsai stunted economy. To dump tradition in favor of the new (ultra liberal) creates a top-heavy digger pine economy that topples.
Personally, I'm pro-choice and for limited government, but I don't think pro-life conservatives are hypocrites. They just feel that abortion is one of those rare cases where the government does need to step in to protect people.
@SteinUndStahl666 They have every right to voice their opinion on abortion. If they believe it should be illegal then their hypocrites. That's government involvement.
Yes, but conservatives believe in government involvement when it comes to protecting people's lives from forces not in their own control. Putting people in jail is government involvement too. We do it in order to protect the lives of other people.
Oh, that's ridiculous. Too much of either side of the political spectrum is unrealistic. Completely limited government would be anarchy. Completely powerful government would be fascism. I don't want to live under either.
READ THIS READ THIS IM A CONSERAL BOTH AND NETHER!!!!!!!
WOW u guys r cool trying to put this and the bible together.
well sloth is in the bible to .
now i am all about helping old and handy cap but not some druggy or lazy person looking for free money. u all need to know the world is not a good place its been this way for a long time
people have miss used the money thing people will miss use this money thing and people are miss using this money thing
@TheMasterReptile WELL YA DUDE BUT THINK OF THIS IF THAT HAPPEN ATHEIST STUFF WOULD COME IN SCHOOL MAKING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE LEAVE THE SCHOOL THEN THE TEACHERS ARE FUCK"T
"If a conservative is gay, he accepts his status as a second-class citizen and shuts up about it. If a liberal is gay, he demands equality under the law." THE NERVE.
@DeadProphetsFate And, when you give or if you gave freely of your own resources that is/would be fine that's even compassionate. It's when you mandate to others what their money is best used for that is a problem. Being compassionate is not gaining power so you can impose taxes and distribute it to the purposes and causes that you deem appropriate. That's tyrannical.
@DeadProphetsFate In addition, liberals like to "liberally" apply things like facts and laws based upon the situation. When it comes to others who they may oppose, they tend to want to hold their feet to the fire & hold them to the letter of the law. But, they don't want to have to be bothered by things like laws and facts unless it is convenient for them to do so--unless it serves them to use them in advancing their desires or their cause.
@DeadProphetsFate Yes the left has effectively hijacked the term liberal...of which one of the meanings is of and pertaining to freedom. Liberally applying things is another meaning though. And liberals (well, today's leftist liberals) tend to liberally apply things like laws...they circumvent things like the constitution when they deem it necessary since it is too hard to get an amendment like they should have to do.
@mcleanm54 I didnt judge anyone..just went by the true definition of the word liberal and conservative...clearly you are the "judgmental" one."Stop it"
@DeadProphetsFate Also, I believe that God uses situations in people's lives for his will--including some people being wealthy. He said it is hard for rich people to enter the kingdom of heaven. But, he didn't say it was impossible. In fact later in the passage I believe he said "but all things are possible in Christ." (after describing how hard it would be for a rich man to enter the kingdom.) At any rate God gives us all freewill. Conservatives nor liberals should impose their own will.
@DeadProphetsFate But, note that Jesus didn't say to go take control of the governments and make laws to force others to sell all that they have and give to the poor and whatever cause that you deem appropriate. Jesus gave the rich man a freewill choice. And, we all have a freewill choice. We should each be free to choose--not mandate of others what we personally believe.
@ronm192 I went by the definition of the words, not by what the government wants the words to mean..the government uses these terms to keep the people divided anyway because they fear a truly united people.
@DeadProphetsFate He did tell a rich person who asked him how to enter the kingdom of heaven to sell all that you have and give it to the poor. He may have been hitting at the heart of the matter for that particular person--that person's hold up in his own heart....the thing that he was idolizing that was keeping him from choosing the kingdom, choosing to follow Jesus.
This video is ridiculous. You really think a gay conservative wouldn't want to be recognized as legally married or be allowed to deserve in the military? How is that demanding "legislated respect"? And no, liberals (rational ones anyway) don't want any mention of God silenced. They just don't want it shoved down everyone's throats. Absolutely ridiculous video.
@scoopolard Read my comment again, look up the definition of liberal and conservative one or two times( or however many it takes for you to comprehend it) and tell me why im "very naive"... I'll FORGIVE you for that comment just to show you I understand the Bible very well.
@Stupideyez All political parties are heading that way my friend. The constituyion is mattring less and less everyday to our government. I hate to say it but america is heading down the pipes.
This is one of the most ignorant close minded videos I have ever seen in my life because it is actually serious. There are so many of these things more of them you can use on a conservative.
sk8chrissupras 2 weeks ago
LOL I love it!!
MrFelix35123 2 weeks ago
LOL I love it!
MrFelix35123 2 weeks ago
but the thing is, this is pretty spot-on accurate, i dont care who you are.
szeilea 3 weeks ago
I'm not offended I just think this video is a ignorant broad generalization of people. Those who can't think for themselves yell generalizations to get attention.
skeech15 1 month ago
just the word liberal sounds bad.
szeilea 1 month ago
@szeilea sorry my friend, but the conservative is a dying breed......
migo53333 3 weeks ago
@migo53333 better the dying breed than the breed that's killing america am i right?
szeilea 3 weeks ago
@szeilea hate to dissapoint but no liberals are killing this country......but you conservatives love bombing the shit out of countries with brown people in them.....and then you go to church and once againpray to those white staues of Jesus......
migo53333 2 weeks ago
@migo53333 okay terrorist, just gtfo lmao you know nothing. you damn blind fool
szeilea 2 weeks ago
@szeilea a conservative gay would quietly lead his life???? wow, what does that mean? he has to keep it in the closet so his gay bashing friends dont find out, because the white jesus will be pissed? how freakin ignorant, I mean conservative.
migo53333 2 weeks ago
@migo53333 you are a pathetic creature, you know nothing about what is right versus wrong, just leave.
szeilea 2 weeks ago
@szeilea no, its better you r a dying breed.........
migo53333 2 weeks ago
I smell a ressentful conservative kid over here.
Seriously, you are the King of Hasty Generalizations and Ignorance.
tecaltabiano 1 month ago
This is obviously made by a conservative who is trying to put down Liberals. I agree some liberals are really that way. But Its far from the truth. Conservatives dont like change. They want to stay pushing their Christain ways on everyone, hating others cause their different, especially liberals who can be the most peace offering of any, who defend other people and who have empathy for others that have to deal with bad circumstances. Cant say the same for a conservative who enjoys war.
palmbebe86 1 month ago 5
@palmbebe86 very well said,Palmbebe.....you will find conservatives to be the most prejudice also.....but they go to church and pray to Jesus, of course the statues of Jesus all depict him as a white person.....
migo53333 2 weeks ago
If a conservative doesn't like the foul language on a television program or conatained in music on the radio, he cries and whines until it is censored.
If a conservative doesn't believe in abortion he demands it be outlawed.
If a conservative doesn't believe in gay marriage he demands it be outlawed.
If a conservative is racist he will make up ludicrous claims about how the president is a muslim anti-christ from Kenya.
jimnihil 1 month ago 5
Other than being incredibly stereotypical! I think very few people agree completely with one side of the other and surely most people’s views are a mix of the two (Well they seem to be in the UK). Why do we feel the need to fit everyone into groups... it bemuses me.
geekyglassesguy 1 month ago
I have to agree with the religious Conservatives on putting prayer back in our schools. By the way, can you point which way is Mecca?
hourof10 1 month ago
Conservatives are full of fear? Who are the ones who've said that republicans want to starve children? And kill the elderly? And poison the water? And dirty our air? It was a liberal democrat who said on the house floor that the republicans want us to die because they were against the health care bill. Fear mongering is right out of the liberals' play book.
66limelight 1 month ago
Wow, what a moron who made this and morons who follow it. Conservatives are full of fear and who are only in it for themselves. There is no community goal and no environmental concerns.
ericjamesphotography 1 month ago
i love this vid this guy hit the nail exectly on the head. well done
WTFproductionsX 1 month ago
with the exceptions that by definition you can't be both conservative and a homosexual at the same time, one precludes the other, and if a liberal is homosexual they want more than just legislated respect, they want legislated extra privileges just because of their personal choice to be one!
dougsterz 2 months ago
Love this video. I saw a comment just before mine who is a tree hugging liberal and he obviously needs to stop listening to Obama because this video, everything in it is true. Well done.
MrDemonslayer2012 2 months ago
I'm sorry......you seem to have the words around the wrong way...what you say for Conservatives is actually true for True Liberals, and what you say for Liberalism is actually true for True Conservatives. If what you say were true on this I would be a Conservative, I am not.I am a True Liberal and the fact that the truth is that if you reversed your comments to make them true would actually be the accurate version shows why I am Liberal and not a lying Conservative - there are other Tories too.
Stepjer75 2 months ago
good job, this video proves that he doesn't understand what liberal is. Liberalism is the belief in the importance of liberty and equal rights. General examples include, supporting ideas such as constitutionalism, liberal democracy, free and fair elections, human rights, capitalism, and freedom of religion. - Source Unknown
ZAGGNUT1 2 months ago
A liberal won't forward it not because he's offended...but because its full of stupid platitudes. The sources are "unknown" because the author just made them up...a common practice for conservatives who don't like how real facts conflict with their worldview.
paulstu11 2 months ago
i am a liberal and i am not offended and i will forward this to all my friends... to show them ignorance in its purest form. i'm not calling you ignorant for your beliefs your beliefs are very valid and SHOULD be heard but the way in which you present them is biased. 1. not all liberals are exactly the same 2. a lot of the things you say about liberals aren't true. also to use the same logic: A conservative doesn't like abortion he decides to out law it. A liberal lets them make the choice.sorry
JonothenRicher 2 months ago
You should do more research of what a liberal actually is and it seems to me you must watch Fox news. Fox news has horrible journalism and it promotes bias through the syphering of political opinions. Many of the pundants on the show are to one side of the spectrum.
rachiesweet144 2 months ago
With regard to Benjamin Franklin, all one has to do is look up his speech at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 to see he makes clear his belief that God "governs the affairs of men," which rules him out being a deist (look up the word "deist" while you're educating yourself on Franklin). Although early in his life Franklin may have indeed been a deist. But he no doubt was a Christian as he got older (with age comes wisdeom:)
RepRedify 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is my Creed: I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by his Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we can render to him, is doing Good to his other Children…. I think the System of Morals [devised by Jesus] and his Religion as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw, or is likely to see;
iron100159 3 months ago
@RepRedify but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have with most of the present Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity.
- Ben Franlin, letter to ezra styles, Mar 9, 1790, not long before his death
Clearly, he believes in God and in Jesus' morality but not his divintiy. He can't be called a Christian.
iron100159 3 months ago
@RepRedify Also, can you cite where Adams regretted his statement, cause the premise to it was that he wanted to scream it 20 times. My bad about Barlow, i accidently said adams wrote it, I meant his administration ratified it and supported, as did all of congress. It was published in newpapers a recieved no major objections. I can't find the text of the 2nd treaty. If your referring to the arabic version of the treaty it was more likely a slip-up that it didn't get in the treaty.
iron100159 3 months ago
@iron100159 "Seventy years ago ... Lemuel Bryant was my parish priest, and Joseph Cleverly my Latin school master ... The parson and the pedagogue lived much together, and were eternally disputing about government and religion. One day when the school master had been more than commonly fanatical and declared "if he were a monarch, he would have but one religion in his dominions;" the parson coolly replied, "Cleverly, you would be the best man in he world if you had no religion!"
RepRedify 3 months ago
Continuing Adams' letter: "Twenty times in the course of my late reading have I been on the point of breaking out, 'This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!!!' But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell."
--Letter from Adams to Thos. Jefferson, April 19, 1817 (Jefferson wrote back agreeing, by the way).
RepRedify 3 months ago
Regarding the Treaty of Tripoli, you conveniently (again) leave what comes after your quote:
"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion AS IT HAS IN ITSELF NO CHARACTER OF ENMITY AGAINST THE LAWS, RELIGION OR TRANQUILITY OF MUSSLEMEN..." In other words the Christianity in America, they were telling the Muslims, was not the same type of Christianty on which the governments in Europe were founded.
RepRedify 3 months ago
In addition, why do you secularists on the Left never discuss other founders such as Rush, Jay, or Webster? Seems you always revolve around three people--usually Franklin, Jefferson, and Paine--and by and large you misquote and twist their words!
RepRedify 3 months ago
@RepRedify I won't deny Webster, Jay, Rush or Henry were strong Christians. However they don't stand up to Washington, Jefferson, Adams,etc. and the constitution. All you've added to the Adams quote is that Adams, though he thought religion was not good, was neccesary to keep a civil world. That doesn't make him a christian, that makes him practical.
iron100159 3 months ago
@iron100159 lol, now you've subtly dragged in Mr. Washington, who once said that religion and morality were the two pillars of good government. Apparently, you also haven't read "John Adams," by McCullough. Adams never said he didn't think religion was good. In fact, he was one of the most devout Christians of all the founding fathers. And Washington's own step granddaughter said to question Washington's religion would be akin to questioning his patriotism.
RepRedify 3 months ago
@RepRedify Thats a pretty big assertion concenring Washington nearly stopped attended Church, though his wife sometimes brought him. she went regularly. When he did go, he refused the eucharist. He refused last rites upon his deathbed. his friend Dr.Abercrombie said shortly after "Sir, Washington was a deist." in a letter a Dr. Wilson who inquired about Washington's beliefs.
iron100159 2 months ago
@iron10015 So you place a "friend" of Washington above his own grandchildren. How convenient. Apparently you haven't read "Sacred Fire," which delves deeplly into Washington's religious faith.
RepRedify 2 months ago
@RepRedify Adams was at best a unitarian. He wrote to Jefferson in Sept 1816 "I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved — the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced! With the rational respect that is due to it, knavish priests have added prostitutions of it, that fill or might fill the blackest and bloodiest pages of human history."
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify "Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind" - Adams, Defense of Constitutions of Government of the United States.
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify "It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses." - John Adams, A Defense of Constitutions of Government of the united States
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify Clearly Adams was suspicious of religion(some more than others) and while he thought a religious/moral population could make for a healthier democracy, he didn't propose it as the basis of America, but reason and sense rather than a heavenly power. He also didn't typically mention Christianity in a good light. He once called it a revelation, but followed up with saying that it was mostly myth though. Washington mentioned god plenty, but never Jesus.
iron100159 2 months ago
@iron100159 "You do well to wish to lean our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are. Congress will do everything they can do assist you in this wise intention."
--George Washington, to the Delaware Indian Chiefs, June 12, 1779
RepRedify 2 months ago
I have never heard of Washington resfusing last rites on his deathbed. I speak as someone who minored in history in college. But I do know that it was Washington who began the practice of placing his hand on the Bible while taking the oath of office, and he went as far as to kiss the Bible afterward. Odd behavior for someone who didn't believe in Jesus.
RepRedify 2 months ago
@RepRedify Concerning the treaty, there's no indication that there was a distinction between 'European Christianity' and 'American Christianity.' Either way, Im pretty sure "no pretext arising from religious opinion" would apply to both. Its a secular treaty. You're asserting that the US told Llibya that the USA was secular though it was actually Christian(a lie)?
iron100159 2 months ago
As I said, the treaty was largely to appease Muslims to stop their pirating of American ships. As Adams was known for keeping peace between America and France, his administration certainly didn not wish to start a two-bit war with Muslims.
RepRedify 2 months ago
@RepRedify In the treaty, the clause ended with "it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries." which shows the point was that the treaty was not to be interpreted by religious views. It didn't have anything to do with which country the religion came from. And if they saw their faith as seperate from Europe, why did they refer to it as THE christian religion?
iron100159 3 months ago
@iron100159 The point of the treaty was to appease Muslim fanatics in Tripoli by declaring that the Christian religion as practiced in the United States was not the same Christian religion that they had fought in Europe. In other words, they were trying to find a way to shut them up so they would leave us alone.
RepRedify 3 months ago
You have no argument on this point, except that the Muslims would have read it as a religious holy war declaration (they're apt to do that) had America not clarified that it was not to be read as such. What's more, Americans believed their practice of Christianity was THE best practice of Christianity, not the practice the Muslims had come to know while fighting holy wars with Europe. This has already been sufficiently explained to you.
RepRedify 2 months ago
John Jay called Christianity as practiced in America "enlightened." John Adams called it "rational." Daniel Webster: "The ecclesiastical establishments of Europe which serve to support tyrannical governments are not the Christian religion but abuses and corruptions of it." He went on to declare that American Christianity was "Christianity to which the sword and fagot are unknown--general tolerant Christianity is the law of the land!" --Noah Webster, "History of the United States" pg 339.
RepRedify 2 months ago
Also, Daniel Webster, "Mr. Webster's Speech in Defence of the Christian Ministry and In Favor of the Religious Instruction of the Young. Delievered in the Supreme Court othe United States, February 10, 1844, in the case of Stephen Girard's Will" pg 52
As with so many liberals, you refuse to look at the intent of the founders, and would rather twist words and phrases. Tisk, tisk.
RepRedify 2 months ago
@RepRedify The Washington quote was a follow up to an agreement between congress and the indians. part 5 of it read: That the said Delaware Nation have established a Town where numbers of them have embraced Christianity under the Instruction of the Reverend and worthy Mr David Ziesberger whose honest zealous Labours & good Examples have Induced many of them to listen to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which has been a means of introducing considerable order, Regularity and love of Peace into the
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify Minds of the whole Nation—the[y] therefore hope Congress will countenance & promote the Mission of this Gentleman, so far as they may deem expedient; and they may rely that the Delaware Nation will afford every encouragement thereto in their Power." - written by a Christian frontiers group. ALthough the Indians had been inviting the missionaries. Washington was being friendly and agreeing that this would be productive for the indians, which i will get the quote for in a moment.
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify "I was a little at a loss what answer to give and could have wished they had made their first application there. But as an answer could not be avoided, I thought it safest to couch it in general but friendly terms and refer them to Congress for a more particular one. Though there is reason to believe, they have not adhered very scrupulously to their pretended friendship, it appeared to me to be our present policy at least to conciliate;
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify and in this spirit my answer was conceived. I hope I may not have deviated from the views of Congress. I send a copy of my answer." - George Washington, delegation to the Congress, May 12, 1779. Clearly, he was just being agreeing and encouraging though he wasn't representing Congress and suspected that this may not represent their views. For his inagguration, the bible was a last minute addition grabbed from a masonic lodge to settle any disputes over what denomaination to represent
iron100159 2 months ago
lol. It doesn't matter whether the Bible was "grabbed" at the last minute. It was still used, upon Washington's insistance. Also, Washington was a Mason--further proving Washington's requirement for a Bible. You have slowly evolved from declaring Washington and the selected founders you have attacked were non-religious to arguing about the denomination of Christianity in which they believed, read their Bibles and such. I'm glad I have helped you along, but you must continue your education.
RepRedify 2 months ago
@RepRedify first. holy shit your fast! lol let me finish my emails before you answer. With Adams, I'm going to continue saying he's a deist or at best unitarian, neither of which are christian, and that Washinton was a deist. Being a mason means he must believe in God, although the Masons were generally pro-secular govt. and so were most classical liberals, a term that generally applies to our founders. The bible doesn't 100% win me over but it is a good point I'll admit.
iron100159 2 months ago
@iron100159 I think our original debate was concerning if the USA was secular or not and we've branched out from there. But I'll still stand up it being secular. In regard to credentials, you've probably studied more history than I have generally but I kinda take to looking a lot of this stuff up as a hobby. Not quite as credable as a college coarse, but I'm not making stuff up. Its good to find someone I can have an intellectual conversation with on youtube... finally
iron100159 2 months ago
@iron100159 lol. If only people in our government would take note of how to have a debate. What's say you and I--2020? lol
RepRedify 2 months ago
@iron100159 I'm not that fast. I always check my emails before heading off to work. But with regard to Adams: "The general principles on which the founders achieved independence were ... the general principles of Christianity ,,, Now I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God..." Letter to Jefferson, June 28, 1813
RepRedify 2 months ago
I confess I don't know very much about the Masons. But it seems that many secularists make the mistake of believing the founders must refer specifically to Jesus every time they speak of Christianity (and many did). I am a strong Christian, though I am not a churchgoer, nor can I remember the last time I specifically proclaimed Jesus as my savior. But He is, and I--like the founders--make the assumption that people understand that when speak of Christianity that includes the belief in Jesus.
RepRedify 2 months ago
@RepRedify He also didn't plan the ceremony himself, though he may have used this sort of bible in masonic ceremonies in DC. As far as the treaty goes, we're going no where with it. You seem to think the US told Libya we were a different christianity that wasn't pointed out in the treaty. I just don't see it. I'm not arguing that many Americans thought America practiced a better Christianity than Europe, but that wasn't referneced in the treaty. Webster and Jay included.
iron100159 2 months ago
@RepRedify Jay was fairly important, but Webster not so much. I can't find that speech on the internet anywhere so I'll have to get back to that point at some other time. sorry. One thing I just remember concenrning the bible. Not fairly important but one president in the 19th century,(I don't remember which off of the top of my head) swore on a law book rather than any religious book. This may not PROVE, but definitely supports that the country is not based off of religion.
iron100159 2 months ago
0:43 What is a foreign religion?
527rubbertoe 3 months ago
Seems like if it wasn't for the conservatives in this country we would still be under English rule.
JOHNBBAD100 3 months ago
Very dogmatic and generalized view of liberalism. The people that this video refers to are those on the extreme left.
liamstarwatcher 3 months ago
Lol yeah the person who posted this video is definitely objective in his/her analysis. Theres really nothing else to say about this garbage.
david3188col 3 months ago
biased
ArkLover27 3 months ago
You can tell this person is a conservative , he's very uneducated!
nashville1510 3 months ago
@12salem well what you said then is a lie, because liberals cant tell the truth nor comprehend factual statements like this one. so even if you told the truth saying the conservatives do not lie, in your own head you would still be lying lmao. I apologize though because liberalism is a mental disorder :(.
nvrlandranchsurviver 3 months ago
if you are non-religious, then you are perfectly capable of sustaining the american dream. but make sure to recognize our country as based off of christianity. religion had always been in our country until the progressive movement, which makes sure to recognize our country as secular. just because you can worship whatever you want here does not make it secular. we are, rather, we were, a christian nation, and nobody cared. no one complained about reading bibles in school.its part of US culture.
fatty1443 3 months ago
@fatty1443 Really? Because many of the founding fathers were deists. And how often does it mention God in the constitution. The only time it mentions religion is that it is separate from govt and can be chosen. If your not convinced, then tell me, which branch of christianity are we. Catholic? Evangelical? Episcopalien? Does mormonism count? After all it is centered around America and was founded in America.
iron100159 3 months ago
@iron100159 First, point to the words "separation of church and state" in the Constitution. You can't because they're not there. Second, your ignorance of our founding fathers is comical. Of the founders, only Thomas Jefferson and perhaps Thomas Paine could legitimately be called "deists." But even Jefferson called himself a "Christian." Lastly, the First Amendment simply means that the Congress cannot establish an official national religion. End of story. Bibles in school, etc. are fine.
RepRedify 3 months ago
@RepRedify The 'wall of seperation is nickname' that Jefferson and Madison made up for atricles 6 and the first amendment.If you wanna be that guy that says just because it does not specifically mention religion in the const. then we must be a Christian nation, then check out what Adams wrote in the treaty of tripoli"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." Sorry but America was founded as a secular nation.
iron100159 3 months ago
@RepRedify "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it." - John Adams, quoted from Charles Francis Adams, ed, Works of John Adams 1856, vol X, p. 254
"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation." - Treaty of tripoli, voted in uniaminously by the senate
Washington rarely went to church. He occasionaly went with his wife to an episcopalian church and when he did, he refused the eucharist. I have more for l8r.
iron100159 3 months ago
@RepRedify Oh ya, and don't get me started on Franklin
iron100159 3 months ago
@iron100159 My, my we don't know our history. Joel Barlow stuck the language into the Treaty of Tripoli, not John Adams. In fact, when the treaty was re-ratified a few years later, that language was removed. You conveniently fail to mention that. Washington's own peers and soldiers vouch for his strong Christian faith--it was Washington who REQUIRED them to attend church on Sundays. Their testimony outweighs your opinion. John Adams later said he regretted making the statement you alude to
RepRedify 3 months ago
Jesus was conservative--hes pro-life. in fact, i can make any joke slamming liberals at my catholic church, and not have to worry because we are true christians, that go to church every sunday because we put God first. and secondly, we dont try to cram religion down your throat. our country was based on judeo-christian values--values we wouldnt have if our founding fathers were atheist. our laws are base off the ten commandments. thats a fact.
fatty1443 3 months ago
If a conservative is a homosexual, he hides it for fear of judgement.
If a liberal is a homosexual, he demands equality and respect.
If a conservative needs healthcare, he seeks it out.
If a liberal needs healthcare, he does the same, but suggests that we all work together to provide for one-another.
Not all liberal views are evil, you just need to step down from your high horse and their suggestions for what they are.
ThinkSerious 3 months ago
Of course a conservative would get a good laugh. :P this is 100% bias. And I wouldn't consider myself either, but I certainly don't agree with a video that can't point out conservative flaws as well.
ThinkSerious 3 months ago
this is freakin stupid. im a liberal and i dont believe half that shit.
cyborganic99 4 months ago
If a Conservative is a victim of gun violence he campaigns for more gun rights so that he may shoot back
If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host he whines about the Liberal Bias in the media
If a Conservative believes in God he tries to establish his own religion above all others
If a Conservative sees this comment he'll be offended and maybe consider that you can't make blanket statements criticizing others deeply held beliefs without offending them.
VicariousViewer 4 months ago
who ever made this must be from western canada, and reads the edmonton sun everyday.
wizwow77 4 months ago
As an independent I see conservatives as evil and liberals as dumb, which is worse, I don't know.
motter28218 4 months ago
lol the like bar is like real life, clashing in the middle
101MUDman101 4 months ago
And when a conservative tries to make his case, he just flat out lies
12salem 4 months ago
clearly someone who has a fox news or rush limbaugh view of liberals & has no clue what a liberal actually is. most of this video is wrong or an outright lie
mrbarber1225 4 months ago
I'm not a liberal, and I don't agree with any of this. "Homosexual conservative" ? LMAO. This just shows how retarded some people can be.
jesse89LA 4 months ago
I'm a liberal in most senses of that word, and I forwarded this to my friends to get a good laugh out of it too. Mosty because what it says is bullshit, which I can partially prove with just one example: what about all the arrogant conservatives who stand outside of Planned Parenthood offices and harass the women going inside? That seems to me to be a little bit invasive upon others, does it not?
jerico641 4 months ago
So not true
YoungIvyScholar 4 months ago
this is retarded and false.
NotJustAnotherRogue 4 months ago
This was obviously made by a conservative
Wolverines457 4 months ago
This is just...awful.
funnipony 4 months ago
Conservatives want to shove religion down my throat,I can't tolerate them for that alone.Leave it in churches and out of schools,court houses and such.Leave me alone with that stuff,I want no part of it yet I'm continually bombarded by it.Creationism in schools?Based on what facts?And which branch of Christianity would win that fight?Nah,I want no part of conservatives and their protection of the wealthy.It's laughable they even claim to be Christians,I think Christ would be unhappy with them.
TerryTresner 5 months ago
@TerryTresner
And that's why I'm proud to be an Atheist Conservative.
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
@SteinUndStahl666 Ohhh, you're atheist. That's even worse. You don't even have religious bullshit to hide behind, you just have to come right out and admit you're a piece of shit human being with no concern for your fellow man. And anti-LGBT is a purely religious concept. It doesn't matter if you claim to be "atheist" if you just jump right in the flock with the rest of the religious sheep. Fail human being is fail.
gingerbreadcorpses 4 months ago
@gingerbreadcorpses
lol, wow. By the way you talk, you must be pretty young.
Anti-LGBT is not "purely religious" at all. There are plenty of people against homosexuality for social and economic reasons, not religious ones. France, Estonia, and the Czech Republic are perhaps the three least religious countries in the world, and gay marriage is illegal in all three.
As for me jumping in the flock, that's silly. If I was a follower, wouldn't I believe in what the majority of Conservatives believe?
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
@SteinUndStahl666 Social and economic reasons? So let me get this straight, you want a segment of the population to remain marginalized and unequal because you think society as a whole would benefit? That's not humane. Also, allowing marriage equality stimulates the economy with more weddings and benefits society by allowing same-sex couples to create and maintain strong families. So what were those social and economic reasons you were blithering about?
gingerbreadcorpses 4 months ago
I think both Conservatives and Liberals are STUPID IDIOTS with the Cons coming number 1 in that category and Libs coming in a close 2nd........A con would see this and say "YAY WE BEAT THEM AGAIN" LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! thumbs up for the vid though 0:53 is funnny, especially because this vid is supposed to offend them...what a set up LOL
plwpahi 5 months ago
Lol this video is so rediculous! Sure it's worded funny, but it doesn't describe conservatives any way near the truth. Conservatives are just as loud and obnoxious as liberals, if not more.
TheGrindsprint 5 months ago
lol this video makes me want to kill someone
CPRinfringer 5 months ago
@CPRinfringer
Then it has succeeded.
"conservative troll face*
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
Comment removed
adda241 5 months ago
@adda241 in this case, only little girls and DUMBASS Liberal 23 yo's listen to Justin Bieber ... you still seeing your Pediatric Dr. ?!?
SupaNami 5 months ago
This is true
thiguy 5 months ago
This was obviously written by a Conservative.
TheMattFillmore 5 months ago
Obviously written by some conservative who doesn't have a clue.
vonlossberg 6 months ago
The economy must grow gracefully, like a tree. A tree follows the golden ratio as it grows horizontally and vertically towards the sun.
The American economy must balance horizontal (tradition) with vertical (new growth).
For example, traditional small businesses must be maintained as new industries surface.
To suppress new growth (ultra conservative) is to create a bonsai stunted economy. To dump tradition in favor of the new (ultra liberal) creates a top-heavy digger pine economy that topples.
eastariel 6 months ago
Harper FTW
disturbedman360 6 months ago
1.If a conservative is black, he goes about his life bowing his head to the white man and dutifully serving him.
If a liberal is black he fights for his rights.
2.If a conservative thinks he's smart he's probably a redneck. If a liberal thinks he's smart he probably is.
GTR66960 6 months ago
@GTR66960 You just insulted conservatives by calling them rednecks, yet liberals are supposed to be tolerant.
Lolomoses 5 months ago
@Lolomoses I prefer the term progressive.
GTR66960 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GTR66960 You just insulted conservatives by calling them rednecks, yet progressives are supposed to be tolerant
Lolomoses 5 months ago
@GTR66960
If a conservative is black, he fights for equal rights.
If a liberal is black, he calls Al Sharpton so he can get more rights than white people.
SteinUndStahl666 5 months ago
@SteinUndStahl666 lol Sterotypes make you feel good, don't they.
GTR66960 5 months ago
I do everything the conservative does in the video before I even watched it trolol.
j03y2fly 6 months ago
Lol very funny video :p
j03y2fly 6 months ago
does anyone here honestly care?
TheJudge137 6 months ago
@redcoyte7 If a liberal doesn't believe in abortion he doesn't have one. If a conservative doesn't believe in abortion he makes it illegal.
pjmgame 6 months ago
@pjmgame its a moral issue
boddenoutdoors 6 months ago
@boddenoutdoors No if's or but's. If you are for a limited government then you should SUPPORT abortion. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.
pjmgame 6 months ago
@pjmgame
Personally, I'm pro-choice and for limited government, but I don't think pro-life conservatives are hypocrites. They just feel that abortion is one of those rare cases where the government does need to step in to protect people.
SteinUndStahl666 5 months ago
@SteinUndStahl666 They have every right to voice their opinion on abortion. If they believe it should be illegal then their hypocrites. That's government involvement.
pjmgame 4 months ago
@pjmgame
Yes, but conservatives believe in government involvement when it comes to protecting people's lives from forces not in their own control. Putting people in jail is government involvement too. We do it in order to protect the lives of other people.
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
@SteinUndStahl666 I still believe its a mother's choice
pjmgame 4 months ago
@pjmgame
I agree. Abortion is one of the few things I'm liberal on. I'm just saying I don't see pro-life conservatives as hypocrites.
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
@SteinUndStahl666 If you believe in limited government there should be no "if's" or "buts". You should stand by your position 100%.
pjmgame 4 months ago
@pjmgame
Oh, that's ridiculous. Too much of either side of the political spectrum is unrealistic. Completely limited government would be anarchy. Completely powerful government would be fascism. I don't want to live under either.
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
READ THIS READ THIS IM A CONSERAL BOTH AND NETHER!!!!!!!
WOW u guys r cool trying to put this and the bible together.
well sloth is in the bible to .
now i am all about helping old and handy cap but not some druggy or lazy person looking for free money. u all need to know the world is not a good place its been this way for a long time
people have miss used the money thing people will miss use this money thing and people are miss using this money thing
Z0mbiepaintball 6 months ago
We need an Atheist president so this bible stuff isn't brought up.
TheMasterReptile 6 months ago 4
@TheMasterReptile WELL YA DUDE BUT THINK OF THIS IF THAT HAPPEN ATHEIST STUFF WOULD COME IN SCHOOL MAKING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE LEAVE THE SCHOOL THEN THE TEACHERS ARE FUCK"T
Z0mbiepaintball 6 months ago
@redcoyote7 "If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect." BECAUSE HE MOTHER FUCKING DESERVES SOME LEGAL RESPECT.
AWesome61696 6 months ago
I have watch the video, I am not offended :D, but even more convinced that liberals have got it right.
Whisper88here 7 months ago
"If a conservative is gay, he accepts his status as a second-class citizen and shuts up about it. If a liberal is gay, he demands equality under the law." THE NERVE.
gingerbreadcorpses 7 months ago
@gingerbreadcorpses
Gays have equality under the law. Liberal gays want to change the law to accommodate them.
SteinUndStahl666 4 months ago
@redcoyote7 "The most innocent among us" Give me a fucking break.
gingerbreadcorpses 7 months ago
generalizing that a whole group of people are fucktards makes you one yourself. gods not real deal with it
harleyd089 7 months ago
it is not even that funny, but i do suppot war and i am a conservitive and liberals are fuck tards
kingroy97 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate And, when you give or if you gave freely of your own resources that is/would be fine that's even compassionate. It's when you mandate to others what their money is best used for that is a problem. Being compassionate is not gaining power so you can impose taxes and distribute it to the purposes and causes that you deem appropriate. That's tyrannical.
ronm192 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate In addition, liberals like to "liberally" apply things like facts and laws based upon the situation. When it comes to others who they may oppose, they tend to want to hold their feet to the fire & hold them to the letter of the law. But, they don't want to have to be bothered by things like laws and facts unless it is convenient for them to do so--unless it serves them to use them in advancing their desires or their cause.
ronm192 7 months ago
@ronm192 neither conservatives or liberals use the terms correctly..thats the point I was making.
DeadProphetsFate 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate Yes the left has effectively hijacked the term liberal...of which one of the meanings is of and pertaining to freedom. Liberally applying things is another meaning though. And liberals (well, today's leftist liberals) tend to liberally apply things like laws...they circumvent things like the constitution when they deem it necessary since it is too hard to get an amendment like they should have to do.
ronm192 7 months ago
@ronm192: Nope. If anything, the hard right has hijacked the term 'Conservative'. =)
MiracleMile90 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate Clearly you are not a christian. Clearly you haven't read the bible. Clearly you are judgmental. Stop it.
mcleanm54 7 months ago
@mcleanm54 I didnt judge anyone..just went by the true definition of the word liberal and conservative...clearly you are the "judgmental" one."Stop it"
DeadProphetsFate 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate Also, I believe that God uses situations in people's lives for his will--including some people being wealthy. He said it is hard for rich people to enter the kingdom of heaven. But, he didn't say it was impossible. In fact later in the passage I believe he said "but all things are possible in Christ." (after describing how hard it would be for a rich man to enter the kingdom.) At any rate God gives us all freewill. Conservatives nor liberals should impose their own will.
ronm192 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate But, note that Jesus didn't say to go take control of the governments and make laws to force others to sell all that they have and give to the poor and whatever cause that you deem appropriate. Jesus gave the rich man a freewill choice. And, we all have a freewill choice. We should each be free to choose--not mandate of others what we personally believe.
ronm192 7 months ago
@ronm192 I went by the definition of the words, not by what the government wants the words to mean..the government uses these terms to keep the people divided anyway because they fear a truly united people.
DeadProphetsFate 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate He did tell a rich person who asked him how to enter the kingdom of heaven to sell all that you have and give it to the poor. He may have been hitting at the heart of the matter for that particular person--that person's hold up in his own heart....the thing that he was idolizing that was keeping him from choosing the kingdom, choosing to follow Jesus.
ronm192 7 months ago
The end is true but rest is not.
zachgre1 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate O you poor mislead child You have no idea what the true meaning of being a conservative is.
Gerow100 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No "offended" like the video says. Find it hilarious at how biased it is.
Serpent541 7 months ago
Comment removed
Serpent541 7 months ago
Comment removed
Serpent541 7 months ago
This video is ridiculous. You really think a gay conservative wouldn't want to be recognized as legally married or be allowed to deserve in the military? How is that demanding "legislated respect"? And no, liberals (rational ones anyway) don't want any mention of God silenced. They just don't want it shoved down everyone's throats. Absolutely ridiculous video.
TreyParkersBitch 7 months ago
Clever video. Loved it
1RedshirtXLG 7 months ago
@DeadProphetsFate ur a very naive individual that has no understanding of the conservative viewpoint or the bible.
scoopolard 7 months ago
@scoopolard Read my comment again, look up the definition of liberal and conservative one or two times( or however many it takes for you to comprehend it) and tell me why im "very naive"... I'll FORGIVE you for that comment just to show you I understand the Bible very well.
DeadProphetsFate 7 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
What candidate doesn't participate in the, "Who is the best Christian contest?"
Christian, Ron Paul, who won the Values Summit poll 2012!
Want safety in America, protect Israel, wipe out Muslims?
MUST SEE VIDEO /watch?v=BHrkc6EB6h0
Gay marriage? Ron Paul says "Yes" /watch?v=l1gzs27HswQ
Ron Paul re: pot and black/Latino Americans and racism:
/watch?v=nhP5PwG5Sks
vechorik 4 months ago
@redcoyote7
I totally agree. I'm an Atheist Conservative, and I've always found Conservative "Christians" to be living examples of any oxymoron.
SteinUndStahl666 7 months ago
Haha this is hilarious. Good job making liberals sound like Nazis when your very own Republican party is almost there itself.
Stupideyez 8 months ago
@Stupideyez All political parties are heading that way my friend. The constituyion is mattring less and less everyday to our government. I hate to say it but america is heading down the pipes.
Gerow100 7 months ago