Added: 4 years ago
From: zoulkyud
Views: 1,181
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i got 5777 on my geekbenck on my mac pro

  • this video was old and so is my system

  • q6600

  • yea they are all really just 2 dual cores stuck in 1 cpu

  • ha i still love my good old AMD 3800+ singlecore 2.4 ghz 1 GB ram Gforce 7300GS....

    funney that i could run crysis in midium setting with out lag

  • BTW this it the lowest end quad core. The 2.4 ghz 6600. I could always buy a quad core extreme and throw it in there.

  • The quad-core extreme is not truly a quad-core processor.

  • Why do you keep commenting on old comments and trying to point things out. Yes its not truely a quad core in fact none of intels quad cores were truly quad cores. That includes the xeon.

  • Last time I checked, just because a comment was old didn't change the fact that you could reply to it...

  • Last I checked replying to old information with irrelevant data that may have changed does not have much of a point.

  • Wow. Do you have to be so touchy? Gosh...

  • Not touchy, just stating the facts. Neither CPU is a true quad core.

  • But I still love you, :D

  • overclock?

  • but dont you think its a shame you have t overclock to get a bechmark like a mac?

  • True. If it's overclocked, it ain't fair.

  • Technically if it was overclocked (which it wasnt) how would it be unfair? The mac can't overclock, thats the only way I I can see it being unfair.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more