Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Nice video!
adrianbrienautomotiv 1 year ago
Dude it's Chrysler that sucks. I own a 2004 Sebring, 2007 and 2010 Mustang V7 and V8. The Chrysler, endless problems and only has 58k miles. The Fords not a single problem and the 07 has 55k miles.
Chryser sucks period.
travisreck 1 year ago
@travisreck What the car that is 3 years newer has had less problems? NO WAY haha jk, but I don't like the Chrysler transmissions. Every other Chrysler or Dodge that is owned by people I know always end up with transmission problems and fairly early on in life (less than 100k). My Ford gave me a lot of problems too. I dumped just over 5k in random repairs before offloading it onto some kid after the slave cylinder went out who wanted a project car.
coninja2007 10 months ago
@coninja2007 Now I own a 4 door Grand Am because I needed a family car. I have done quite a few repairs, but I can afford it. I replaced the entire ignition system, coils, ICM, ALL IGNITION. Plus all sensors(except in wheel bearings) on the car for less than $300 The distributor on my Ford was $429 plus taxes. Just one item in the ignition system. The IAC valve was just under $250. When they go bad they will bring your wallet with you.I don't care what company I have, but these are my life facts
coninja2007 10 months ago
Comment removed
coninja2007 10 months ago
Please don't anyone buy this piece of crap. just google 2004 Chrysler Sebring LX and read about oil sludge problems. my 2004 chrysler sebring LX sucks bad. only 78,000 needs ball joints, needs rack and pinoins however you spell it.replaced water pump at 60,000. and a whole bunch of other crap. should have bought a toyota even if the gas pedal sticks. us americans in the USA cannot OK CAN NOT BUILD A decent car anymore. maybe back in 1955 but 2004 no good.
blueeyedzena 1 year ago