This is such a bad movie. Snot nose criminals getting their own command, a villain so dumb that he makes Bevies and Butthead look like Steven Hawking. A teacher sleeping with a student does not tolerate other students cheating on a no win test. The super ship can't take one tinny ship hitting it but can wipe out two armadas; AND Black holes that suck in everything but spits out ships into the past then just disappear. The characters are tipical Hollywood cliché. THIS IS A BAD MOVIE!
The music was good, but the film made me sad that Star Trek was rebooted, reenvisioned, reimagined, or whatever term they use. Star Trek is finally Dead!.
alexisnomad I am right with you I have see all the movies with the original cast several times and all the movies with the cast of TNG and they are all GRRRRRRRREAT but this new Star Trek movie that came out in 2009 was the best Star Trek yet to date I would love to see it again I like Lenord Niemoys Cameo in the movie were he is on the ice planet i wont give away any more of the movie in case some of you all havent seen it yet the original series is great along with TNG
When Nero's ship was drilling into Vulcan where were all the Vulcan ships? Surely at least one could have fired at the drilling platform cable and prevented Vulcan from being destroyed. At the end of movie Spock did just that and saved earth. I guess if Vulcan did not get destroyed the movie would have been quite short.
@hsharrott The Vulcan ships that do exist are primarily for scientific and research purposes, and did you see how the Narda (Nero's ship) took out a squad of Starfleet vessels?!? Sending unarmed civilian vessels into it's firing range would be like putting cookies within my arms reach!
For previous 10 Star Trek movies, the creators (including score composers) were trying to escape the "small" (TV) screen and GO BIG. Therefore, the music sounded more expansive and symphonic, like Star Wars. For JJ's Trek reboot, they wanted to recapture the original series "feel." Therefore, the music was less complex, less orchestral; it reminded me of the quirky music from the original Star Trek versus "classical" music by Goldsmith and Horner. I thought Giacchino's score was quite excellent.
@ken1w Don't you think it has a tinge of "nostromo" from the movie "aliens"?
The idea of planetary destruction is very well placed. War cannot be used to boost economic cycle when more than one planet is involved. The "cobal bombt" presently has the power to eliminate our biosphere. Star faring ships use a very high energy by means of total annihilation "fusion". War gamers do not understand this. Engaging in Interplanetary war would be using a-bombs to conquor Hawaii
certainly sounds alot like michaels other word, "up" is probably the most individuel thing he's done, however bravo! can't get enough of michaels music
also one thing i didnt like about the old series was its 2d characters everything was black and white but this new story arch makes everyone more believable as far as star trek can be made beliveable
well the entire movie was an alternate reality from the one in the tv series. if nero (niro?) and old spock hadnt come from the future, nothing would have changed
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
your theory is very flawed. in order to change the past you would have to go even farther into the past. to change the future you must go to the past. so to say by going to the past the events shifted is false. this movie was not very well thought out in my opinion. the only actors that were any good as of acting was leanard nimoy. i am sorry i didnt care for this movie much. it was too flasshy for 1, and
what are you talking about the movie made it work since almost ever ship and captain in star fleet was killed by Nero when the went to Vulcan it makes perfect sense
I thought Michael Giacchino's work on the film was genius because he WASN'T constantly blaring the TOS theme at us the whole movie and he had to come up with his own music to carry it. When it kicks in at the end is pretty nifty, but the movie is really about it's own musical experience (basically there's that music cue that starts in the Kelvin attack you see repeated throughout) which makes the film stronger.
@generalflood You cant get a copy unless you record it from the film yourself.
I work in the industry and have called many offices to get bits of music cut from movie soundtraks, the answer is always "no" unless you want to rent the writes for a production
If you just wont take no for an answer call the music producers office, his name will be on the CD case, google his office number and give him a call. Cant hurt. His secrotary will answer the phone just so you know who your talking to gl
Nice video, If you want to make money and earn free prizes, watch my videos. Anyone who comments them or rates them a 5 will get the same done to ALL their videos,
Nero's arrival wouldnt have changed a dang thing. Kirk's father was NEVER in Starfleet, therefore Kirk's mother never would've been on the Kelvin to even give birth to James T. They added more questions then they answered. Alternate reality or not, time travel is the biggest excuse in the book for fixing timeline/canon mistakes. But my biggest beef with the score is that The Trek theme appears...at the END of the movie? Lame. And only 40 minutes of the score were released on CD...
its only at the end of the movie that it takes on the Trek....so in essence its setting up the future....they werent gelled as a group yet...in the end they are kirks enterprise not pikes...its a subtlety i personally liked the change.
I didnt look at it that way....thats a good point. But being a hardcore Trek fan I was hoping for more of Courage's Trek fanfare throught the movie at random points
Im still wondering if the time line is fixed. In the origional star trek uiniverse,Vulcan is not blown up and Kirks father didnt die that way or that early. So as Trek fans are we supposed to just get used to this new time line or what?
yes and i was a hard core trek fan and as much as they goofed around with time travel in the shows why are you even questioning this one its the only time travel story arch they ever did that made any since
it's a different reality, so there's the normal star trek timeline, this one is completely separate. It's like the episode of TNG when Warf goes through all the different realities and in some the borg have taken over the ship and others the federation is destroyed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
blah.... I really don't like this score. I literally laughed out loud when the main title came across the screen. I mean seriously... is this what film scores are now? sad...
I liked the transition music he wrote... you'd hear it between big transitions... but past that...eh. The reprise of TOS title was nice too...
why are people so lame sometimes give credit where credit is do this was great possivebly the best you'll see all year for most part they got it right and I love the new main theme song it feels heroic and has a sense of hope which has always been one of star trek's running themes through out all the series NOUGH SAID
in many series and also films of star trek there is a special unit of the federation which repairs manipulatet timelines to save the future. why not at the end of this film? ^^. with the destruction of vulkan the timeline is heavily damaged ^^
well ok perhaps it would destroy the amtmosphere of the film but so big parts of the star trek we know never gonna happen! ^^
Yea it is. The new Star Trek movie time line does not effect the original Trek time line in any way. As stated by the creators. They did this so they could create a new separate Star Trek universe without destroying the old one. A clean slate.
Yes. It. Is. As confirmed by Paramount, JJ Abrams, Roberto Orci, Memory Alpha and the timeline posted on the Star Trek Online game website. The film takes place in a divergent timeline that splits from the "Prime Timeline" in 2233. The Prime Timeline, last seen in Spock's flashback sequence from 2387, continues on, unaffected. You may not like it, but that is what the people in charge of the franchise have decreed, and no amount of whining "no it's not! I don't like that!" will change it.
It's called being verbose. You should try it sometime. It's far preferable to simply making carte blanche four-word statements designed only to irritate and inflame people. You know, behavior generally reserved for 12-year-olds.
And most of those responses are to far earlier comments and shouldn't even be on the first page. It's not my fault YouTube's comment system is broken.
What did you call it "carte blanche four-word statements", well, it's sure is enough to get you to respond back, I'm aware of what I write no matter what. So don't you act like a child and pretend like Youtube doesn't post up our comments. Even though I'm aware that the host of the page has the option of controlling whats posted.
No... What I mean is, I responded to comments on pages two and three, not the front page, which should have been placed underneath them, indented, rather than at the top on the front page. YouTube's coding is lousy, and places comments randomly at times, then shifts them around. You implied I was attempting to flood the front page. This was not so. Case in point, this comment SHOULD appear underneath yours, slightly indented. Bet you anything it will appear directly at the top.
You're refering to the 29th Century time travelling Starfleet seen in Voyager, and Daniels' "faction" from the 31st Century seen in Enterprise, yes? They wouldn't change anything, since nothing changed from their point of view. They are from the future of the Prime Reality, which Nero's unique form of travel from 2387 to 2233 removes him and Spock from. It is left unchanged and intact. This new timeline is "virginal," skewing off the main timeline in 2233.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Im sorry but the name trekkie/trekker is trademarked for people who are fans of all 6 star trek shows and original 10 movies. You are not a trekkie, i am. and for likeing this movie that just Proves you dont understand the fundamentals of star trek. all you like is big Noises and big explosions that have no inelegant story.
Wow, I can see where you're coming from, but chill out...there's no better way to scare new comers away from a great show/culture than by telling them they basically have no right to like what you like.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I agree that the music was off a little. What disappointed me was that they hardly even had the actual enterprise theme in it (The Motion Picture theme, TNG theme)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
THE WORST Star Trek film score EVER. Horrible in every respect. Gianchino is a fine composer, I have loved his work on LOST, Speed Racer, The Incredibles and more.. but for Star Trek he was 100% WRONG.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
should have picked a better composer....doesn't even come close to be as good as the music from previous films....listening to it make me think of Jack and Kate running after John Locke. Toooo much like the LOST soundtrack. Just not as good as previous scores. Check out the main theme from the undiscovered country, now there is some great star trek music.
Holy... Really? All 737 hours? By 15! Damn... I thought I was bad. It took me until I was 25 to see it all, and not just because Enterprise ended right before I turned 25. I literally finally saw the one episode of TNG I had yet to see (the terrible "Sub Rosa") in 2005.
Yep and I started it over. I'm watching It all over again. It will take some time but I love star trek. I usually I watch 1 episode a day but sometimes I watch between 3 and 8 episodes a day. Some people think that I'm crazy. But i dont care. I just love to wacth star trek.
Star Trek Fan since 1966......thinks this is by far......the BEST star trek film.....better than ST2 Wrath of Khan, ST 4 the Voyage Home or ST 6 the Undiscovered Country or ST 8 First Contact
James T Kirk riding on his motorcycle through an Iowa cornfield......stopping.........to look at the shell of the starship under construction.....possibly the ENTERPRISE
i thought taht this movie was really well cast. it doesnt look like it in this video, but i thought that everybody looked just like younger versions of the original cast (except for checkof).
my favorite guy is scotty i mean, hes really funny "the future, brillant, do they still have sandwiches there". I really got a kick out of that one when I first heard it.
Yeah but Scotty was sentenced to that remote outpost for losing Admiral Archers dog? Wouldn't that make him well over one hundered years old? Continuity, continuity, continuity....
I actually had the same question, concerning Admiral Archer's age. One of the directors explained this by pointing out that it is, indeed, the future. One might expect longer life expectancies, then.
I just don't believe that archer can live that long. If he lived to the movie that makes him 148 years old. McCoy in TNG is said to be the oldest human alive at the age of 137.
Gonna have to poke some holes in your logic there. At no point in "Encounter at Farpoint" is it said McCoy is "the oldest human alive." His age is stated, that's all. It seems a bit strange that now, in 2009, people can live to 120, but by 2364 (when Farpoint took place), 137 is the limit? Just 17 more years? But they can go faster than light, cure almost all diseases, and replicate any food on a whim? Not bloody likely. Besides, "Archer" may be another person entirely.
well in some novels it's stated that mccoy is one of the oldest humans alive. However in those novels mccoy is 150. So that's pretty darn old. People can live to be 120 today but they aren't exactly lucid or mobile. McCoy can still walk, talk, eat, etc. There's only one archer. :)
Meeehhhhh... The books aren't canon the way they are for Star Wars. ...Unfortunately. There's a lot of good stuff in there (and, apparently, Orci is fond of them to the point of integrating some of their ideas into the new films; a lot of "Best Destiny" and "Enterprise: the First Adventure" is in the 2009 film).
The bigger continuity issue is this: during the library computer sequence of "In a Mirror, Darkly, Part II," Archer's ulimate fate is said to be death from natural causes in 2245.
Yeah I know. It's a pity because a lot of trek books are good. In my opinion archer lived too long. Trip, malcolm, travis, hoshi they all died long before archer did.
Of course, the screen was never meant to be seen that clearly, and we only know it said that because the original graphic was posted online, so it's a question if that's canon at all. ALSO, the timeline SKEWS (if you'll pardon the Doc Brown quotation) into this alternate tangent in 2233, which may very well have completely changed the circumstances of Arhcer's later life. Although I think we can all agree the "prized beagle" is not Porthos. Humas may live longer, but no dog will live to 110!
So nero affects archer's last 12 years of life big deal, it's not like archer will change that much. Maybe they have some kind of super dog food in the 22nd century. :) I mean come on in enterprise Porthos was like 14 years old.
well probably not she was a science officer half way across the ship from any escape pod so its unlikely in the 10 tops of 15 seconds to get there even though that seen was scary and where austin healey died =]
an absolutely amazing film..a MUST OWN on blu-ray or DVD.
ive grown up with star trek and hated how bland and boring it became the last 10 years, but JESUS CHRIST, i was not prepaired for what JJ Abrams was going to do.
this isnt just THE GREATEST STAR TREK MOVIE EVER, it might just be the best film of 2009.
a gripping non-stop action film that grabs you from the first scene and NEVER lets go.
SEE THIS MOVIE .
If this is any indication of the new series of films count me in.
Well there doing a trilogy of films with that cast so you'll see them on the enterprise again ut it would be hard to get hollywood actors to work on a tv show.
I agree with this, but not in a negative sense. Wrath of Khan is about growing old, while the new 'Star Trek' is reflective of more youthful passion. Kids are going to connect to it more than Wrath of Khan, while the older generation is, naturally, going to make fun of us (the youthful generation) for liking it more. I think both movies are fantastic, but I like this Trek more because it appeals more to me at my current point in life. Movies affect people at different points in their life.
@KagamiismyLover i saw The Wrath of Khan in the theaters when i was 9 years old … and knew instantly it was a great film THEN! a great story is a great story no matter what age group is portrayed . JJ needs to take a few directing lessons from Nick Meyer
I saw the movie twice as well and i have to that the movie is flawless! Stargate is way to cheesy for my taste.Battlestar Galactica will always be my show.
I too am a Stargate fan, althought I have watched the entire Voyager series, some of TNG and DS9 and also I have dabbled in Enterprise, but I have always thought that the original series was just too tacky and cheap. This film however is phoenominal and the visual effects are astounding. No wonder when they were done by ILM who did Jurassic Park. I am still more of a Stargate fan than I will ever be a Star Trek fan but this film has made me realise Star Trek is still alive and well.
AssWhooper I agree with you im a Stargate fan, and i watched the odd enterprise episode but when i saw this movie i was like "HOLY FUCK" I want this on dvd NOW! lol
I've never been a fan of "Star trek", I always refused to watch the T.V. show, but I must say that the movie was brilliant, I may give the T.V. show a chance now that I've watched the movie!
At start thought I was listening to LOST.
downunderdemocrat 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is such a bad movie. Snot nose criminals getting their own command, a villain so dumb that he makes Bevies and Butthead look like Steven Hawking. A teacher sleeping with a student does not tolerate other students cheating on a no win test. The super ship can't take one tinny ship hitting it but can wipe out two armadas; AND Black holes that suck in everything but spits out ships into the past then just disappear. The characters are tipical Hollywood cliché. THIS IS A BAD MOVIE!
Trekfreek 2 months ago
The music was good, but the film made me sad that Star Trek was rebooted, reenvisioned, reimagined, or whatever term they use. Star Trek is finally Dead!.
templerman1 2 months ago
I ,literally, get goosebumps every time I hear this ... and I <3 it :)
rachitsaran1987 4 months ago
James T Kirk has 3 ears, his right ear, his left ear.... and... The FINAL FRONTIER! :')
hannahc888 5 months ago
Space the final Frontier
83Toschi 7 months ago 3
alexisnomad I am right with you I have see all the movies with the original cast several times and all the movies with the cast of TNG and they are all GRRRRRRRREAT but this new Star Trek movie that came out in 2009 was the best Star Trek yet to date I would love to see it again I like Lenord Niemoys Cameo in the movie were he is on the ice planet i wont give away any more of the movie in case some of you all havent seen it yet the original series is great along with TNG
Cena44 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
got this on dvd yesterday, REALLY enjoyed it. best film Ive seen in awhile
MrHEC381991 7 months ago
Such a cool track.
RedEyesTakeWarning 9 months ago
@ken1w same composer
m4ntan 11 months ago
When Nero's ship was drilling into Vulcan where were all the Vulcan ships? Surely at least one could have fired at the drilling platform cable and prevented Vulcan from being destroyed. At the end of movie Spock did just that and saved earth. I guess if Vulcan did not get destroyed the movie would have been quite short.
hsharrott 1 year ago
@hsharrott The Vulcan ships that do exist are primarily for scientific and research purposes, and did you see how the Narda (Nero's ship) took out a squad of Starfleet vessels?!? Sending unarmed civilian vessels into it's firing range would be like putting cookies within my arms reach!
djbeadle95 11 months ago
Nice rendition of the theme. I like it...
hsharrott 1 year ago
For previous 10 Star Trek movies, the creators (including score composers) were trying to escape the "small" (TV) screen and GO BIG. Therefore, the music sounded more expansive and symphonic, like Star Wars. For JJ's Trek reboot, they wanted to recapture the original series "feel." Therefore, the music was less complex, less orchestral; it reminded me of the quirky music from the original Star Trek versus "classical" music by Goldsmith and Horner. I thought Giacchino's score was quite excellent.
ken1w 1 year ago
@ken1w Don't you think it has a tinge of "nostromo" from the movie "aliens"?
The idea of planetary destruction is very well placed. War cannot be used to boost economic cycle when more than one planet is involved. The "cobal bombt" presently has the power to eliminate our biosphere. Star faring ships use a very high energy by means of total annihilation "fusion". War gamers do not understand this. Engaging in Interplanetary war would be using a-bombs to conquor Hawaii
dynagravitomagnetic 1 year ago
@dynagravitomagnetic The excerpt in this video reminded my of some of the incidental music from "Lost."
ken1w 1 year ago
@ken1w ...
capitalsfan4ever 9 months ago
absolute garbage compared to Mr James Horner
joeylodes 1 year ago
brb gotta go kick some Romulan arse and save humanity.
*gets sucked into drill of fire*
"AUUUGGHHGHGHGGHGH!!"
Subtitles00 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This theme tune is called Hella Bar Talk by Michael Giacchino :)
eezZzee 1 year ago
This theme tune is called Hella BarTalk by Michael Giacchino :)
eezZzee 1 year ago
Gorgeous soundtrack. It really grows on you. Cracking movie as well.
jemimakahn 1 year ago
Sounds like: The pillar of Autumn from Halo: Reach.
The Star Trek soundtrack was perfect for the audience/emotion and atmosphere of the film. A true masterpiece.
Rich4rd1000 1 year ago
This is the theme that reminded me of Lost (this means I LIKED IT)
kranktank 1 year ago
is there any longer vresion of this soundtrack?
Levontc 1 year ago
great movie/series
noksinerate 1 year ago
Maybe not as epic as Wrath of Khan, or as sci-fi eerie as The Motion Picture, but this score is absolutely weighted with emotion.
hafabee 1 year ago 2
reminds me of halo...
Starverseful 1 year ago
LOST MUSICIAN
mikehtv 1 year ago
star trek è un ideale...una ragione di vita!! Ma qua nex k speak un fia de italiano?
4everSPQR 1 year ago
@4everSPQR hai ragione! è proprio un ideale, un film da rivedere fino all'infinito!!
toroclub96 1 year ago
this song is cool
MsNerfer 1 year ago
Good one.
MrRayD8 1 year ago
certainly sounds alot like michaels other word, "up" is probably the most individuel thing he's done, however bravo! can't get enough of michaels music
thisisqhuan 1 year ago
love the beat
preorder1 1 year ago
Awesome gotta love the theme its like totally awesome
Reggier2d2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I saw this movie and think it was no less impressive than Avatar - great acting, directing, magnificent visual effects.
Chris Pine, Winona Ryder, Eric Bana and Jennifer Morrison did a brilliant job!!!
DanikaK2 1 year ago
great music. it was a great film too
devastator06 2 years ago 5
I just dreamed about this music cuz I fell ashleep
oldParasiteSingle 2 years ago
@ciscokitty8 Who and what are you talking about?
Seniter 2 years ago
@gondfrank yeah and get like a million viruses from doing it. no thanks.
ciscokitty8 2 years ago
for some reason J.J. Abrahms likes alternate realities lol
ffinfinity1 2 years ago
For god sake's people. Take it for what it is. IT'S A FILM. Jesus get a life. I'm a star trek nut and i like all star treks.
steve101307 2 years ago 4
also one thing i didnt like about the old series was its 2d characters everything was black and white but this new story arch makes everyone more believable as far as star trek can be made beliveable
drewswift 2 years ago 2
well the entire movie was an alternate reality from the one in the tv series. if nero (niro?) and old spock hadnt come from the future, nothing would have changed
sprklgurl2324 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your theory is very flawed. in order to change the past you would have to go even farther into the past. to change the future you must go to the past. so to say by going to the past the events shifted is false. this movie was not very well thought out in my opinion. the only actors that were any good as of acting was leanard nimoy. i am sorry i didnt care for this movie much. it was too flasshy for 1, and
johnstmary1716 2 years ago
they even say in the movie that they created an alternate reality...
sprklgurl2324 2 years ago
what are you talking about the movie made it work since almost ever ship and captain in star fleet was killed by Nero when the went to Vulcan it makes perfect sense
drewswift 2 years ago
I thought Michael Giacchino's work on the film was genius because he WASN'T constantly blaring the TOS theme at us the whole movie and he had to come up with his own music to carry it. When it kicks in at the end is pretty nifty, but the movie is really about it's own musical experience (basically there's that music cue that starts in the Kelvin attack you see repeated throughout) which makes the film stronger.
ohsodreary 2 years ago 2
Anyone know where i can get the music where they are fighting on the platform?
generalflood 2 years ago
@generalflood You cant get a copy unless you record it from the film yourself.
I work in the industry and have called many offices to get bits of music cut from movie soundtraks, the answer is always "no" unless you want to rent the writes for a production
If you just wont take no for an answer call the music producers office, his name will be on the CD case, google his office number and give him a call. Cant hurt. His secrotary will answer the phone just so you know who your talking to gl
newm123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video, If you want to make money and earn free prizes, watch my videos. Anyone who comments them or rates them a 5 will get the same done to ALL their videos,
GamerNERD420 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey nice video, check out mine and learn how to get a free xbox or anything.
GamerNERD420 2 years ago
@ SlumberCats:
It's the 4th track on the soundtrack CD: Hella Bar Talk
theqwertzman 2 years ago
Comment removed
YouFailBigTime123 2 years ago
whats the name of this track?
SlumberCats 2 years ago
"sigh", trekkies... songs' still pretty cool though
YouFailBigTime123 2 years ago
Nero's arrival wouldnt have changed a dang thing. Kirk's father was NEVER in Starfleet, therefore Kirk's mother never would've been on the Kelvin to even give birth to James T. They added more questions then they answered. Alternate reality or not, time travel is the biggest excuse in the book for fixing timeline/canon mistakes. But my biggest beef with the score is that The Trek theme appears...at the END of the movie? Lame. And only 40 minutes of the score were released on CD...
bombarde1701a 2 years ago
its only at the end of the movie that it takes on the Trek....so in essence its setting up the future....they werent gelled as a group yet...in the end they are kirks enterprise not pikes...its a subtlety i personally liked the change.
ReAnimatedVision 2 years ago
I didnt look at it that way....thats a good point. But being a hardcore Trek fan I was hoping for more of Courage's Trek fanfare throught the movie at random points
bombarde1701a 2 years ago
Im still wondering if the time line is fixed. In the origional star trek uiniverse,Vulcan is not blown up and Kirks father didnt die that way or that early. So as Trek fans are we supposed to just get used to this new time line or what?
shocfacter 2 years ago
yes and i was a hard core trek fan and as much as they goofed around with time travel in the shows why are you even questioning this one its the only time travel story arch they ever did that made any since
drewswift 2 years ago
************* Nerd Alert!***********
it's a different reality, so there's the normal star trek timeline, this one is completely separate. It's like the episode of TNG when Warf goes through all the different realities and in some the borg have taken over the ship and others the federation is destroyed.
adamt4553 2 years ago
@adamt4553 Hey, absolutely no shame in being a nerd :)
FirebirdSinging26 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
blah.... I really don't like this score. I literally laughed out loud when the main title came across the screen. I mean seriously... is this what film scores are now? sad...
I liked the transition music he wrote... you'd hear it between big transitions... but past that...eh. The reprise of TOS title was nice too...
BrachioInGen 2 years ago
Warning: This video contains extract of pure awesomeness.
Solten132 2 years ago 69
lmao so true!!!!
I didnt like star trek before i saw this movie, it made stare trek cool/awesome!!!
markiee131 2 years ago
why are people so lame sometimes give credit where credit is do this was great possivebly the best you'll see all year for most part they got it right and I love the new main theme song it feels heroic and has a sense of hope which has always been one of star trek's running themes through out all the series NOUGH SAID
max2082 2 years ago 3
in many series and also films of star trek there is a special unit of the federation which repairs manipulatet timelines to save the future. why not at the end of this film? ^^. with the destruction of vulkan the timeline is heavily damaged ^^
well ok perhaps it would destroy the amtmosphere of the film but so big parts of the star trek we know never gonna happen! ^^
kcirtap86patrick 2 years ago 2
The movie takes place in a totally seperate universe. They can't ruin our Star Trek.
billyboyjennings 2 years ago
No it doesn't.
Gottahavemyricema 2 years ago
Yea it is. The new Star Trek movie time line does not effect the original Trek time line in any way. As stated by the creators. They did this so they could create a new separate Star Trek universe without destroying the old one. A clean slate.
billyboyjennings 2 years ago
No it's not.
Gottahavemyricema 2 years ago
Yes. It. Is. As confirmed by Paramount, JJ Abrams, Roberto Orci, Memory Alpha and the timeline posted on the Star Trek Online game website. The film takes place in a divergent timeline that splits from the "Prime Timeline" in 2233. The Prime Timeline, last seen in Spock's flashback sequence from 2387, continues on, unaffected. You may not like it, but that is what the people in charge of the franchise have decreed, and no amount of whining "no it's not! I don't like that!" will change it.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
You must feel good that your comments take up the entire page, good for you buddy. pat youself on the shoulder.
And I can whine all i want.
Gottahavemyricema 2 years ago
It's called being verbose. You should try it sometime. It's far preferable to simply making carte blanche four-word statements designed only to irritate and inflame people. You know, behavior generally reserved for 12-year-olds.
And most of those responses are to far earlier comments and shouldn't even be on the first page. It's not my fault YouTube's comment system is broken.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
What did you call it "carte blanche four-word statements", well, it's sure is enough to get you to respond back, I'm aware of what I write no matter what. So don't you act like a child and pretend like Youtube doesn't post up our comments. Even though I'm aware that the host of the page has the option of controlling whats posted.
Gottahavemyricema 2 years ago
No... What I mean is, I responded to comments on pages two and three, not the front page, which should have been placed underneath them, indented, rather than at the top on the front page. YouTube's coding is lousy, and places comments randomly at times, then shifts them around. You implied I was attempting to flood the front page. This was not so. Case in point, this comment SHOULD appear underneath yours, slightly indented. Bet you anything it will appear directly at the top.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
Yup. It did.
Gottahavemyricema 2 years ago
You're refering to the 29th Century time travelling Starfleet seen in Voyager, and Daniels' "faction" from the 31st Century seen in Enterprise, yes? They wouldn't change anything, since nothing changed from their point of view. They are from the future of the Prime Reality, which Nero's unique form of travel from 2387 to 2233 removes him and Spock from. It is left unchanged and intact. This new timeline is "virginal," skewing off the main timeline in 2233.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
MY Fellow Star Trekkies! To what has granted us with such an amazing movie?
And amazing movie maker....And to him, we thank him for Star Trek! So say with me!
HAIL STAR TREK!!!!
XlegendxsnipeX 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Im sorry but the name trekkie/trekker is trademarked for people who are fans of all 6 star trek shows and original 10 movies. You are not a trekkie, i am. and for likeing this movie that just Proves you dont understand the fundamentals of star trek. all you like is big Noises and big explosions that have no inelegant story.
venera13studios 2 years ago
Wow, I can see where you're coming from, but chill out...there's no better way to scare new comers away from a great show/culture than by telling them they basically have no right to like what you like.
ecthelion117 2 years ago 3
Yeah, okay. If you think so.
Gottahavemyricema 2 years ago
2009 star trek was the best
i thought it would be horrible but it was really good!!
debbiejonas 2 years ago 5
Yeah I think they should have added a little TNG but in the end they did the orgial theme for the credits
SniperCadett 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I agree that the music was off a little. What disappointed me was that they hardly even had the actual enterprise theme in it (The Motion Picture theme, TNG theme)
DarthNecros390 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THE WORST Star Trek film score EVER. Horrible in every respect. Gianchino is a fine composer, I have loved his work on LOST, Speed Racer, The Incredibles and more.. but for Star Trek he was 100% WRONG.
hollywoodsaloon 2 years ago
This soundtrack was ok. Definitely expertly done, but it has no timeless quality.
I think it's a lot like the movie in that way: well directed, but poorly written.
irreverentmoose 2 years ago
dumbass you don't even know what your talking about
IceStormGamer 2 years ago
booooooo
irreverentmoose 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
should have picked a better composer....doesn't even come close to be as good as the music from previous films....listening to it make me think of Jack and Kate running after John Locke. Toooo much like the LOST soundtrack. Just not as good as previous scores. Check out the main theme from the undiscovered country, now there is some great star trek music.
dragonfilm 2 years ago
The visual is half the experience...the music is the other half, that most people dont realize =) Very good movie!
Sinreck 2 years ago
ADORE the movie (seen 6 times and always fresh), LOVE the music also.
gilliegirl4 2 years ago 6
i´ve seen ALL Films
very c00l!!!
JulianHeil 2 years ago
Comment removed
alexisnomad1 2 years ago 2
Holy... Really? All 737 hours? By 15! Damn... I thought I was bad. It took me until I was 25 to see it all, and not just because Enterprise ended right before I turned 25. I literally finally saw the one episode of TNG I had yet to see (the terrible "Sub Rosa") in 2005.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
Yep and I started it over. I'm watching It all over again. It will take some time but I love star trek. I usually I watch 1 episode a day but sometimes I watch between 3 and 8 episodes a day. Some people think that I'm crazy. But i dont care. I just love to wacth star trek.
alexisnomad1 2 years ago 29
Star Trek Fan since 1966......thinks this is by far......the BEST star trek film.....better than ST2 Wrath of Khan, ST 4 the Voyage Home or ST 6 the Undiscovered Country or ST 8 First Contact
northshore7x 2 years ago 10
Oh yeah I've watched 20+ episodes of the orig Star Trek series.
A funny part was when in 1 episode Kirk slapped Spock like 6 times then Spock slapped Kirk a single time, and the Cap was almost thrown away :D
marcovaaa 2 years ago 2
James T Kirk riding on his motorcycle through an Iowa cornfield......stopping.........to look at the shell of the starship under construction.....possibly the ENTERPRISE
northshore7x 2 years ago
it was the enterprise...
zakyb1 2 years ago
i thought taht this movie was really well cast. it doesnt look like it in this video, but i thought that everybody looked just like younger versions of the original cast (except for checkof).
johnadams8000 2 years ago
my favorite guy is scotty i mean, hes really funny "the future, brillant, do they still have sandwiches there". I really got a kick out of that one when I first heard it.
demonguy1234 2 years ago
Yeah but Scotty was sentenced to that remote outpost for losing Admiral Archers dog? Wouldn't that make him well over one hundered years old? Continuity, continuity, continuity....
thanks51 2 years ago
I actually had the same question, concerning Admiral Archer's age. One of the directors explained this by pointing out that it is, indeed, the future. One might expect longer life expectancies, then.
Bushido215 2 years ago
Its also possible it is an entirely different person than the Archer on Enterprise.
p655321 2 years ago
I just don't believe that archer can live that long. If he lived to the movie that makes him 148 years old. McCoy in TNG is said to be the oldest human alive at the age of 137.
hoppers001 2 years ago
Gonna have to poke some holes in your logic there. At no point in "Encounter at Farpoint" is it said McCoy is "the oldest human alive." His age is stated, that's all. It seems a bit strange that now, in 2009, people can live to 120, but by 2364 (when Farpoint took place), 137 is the limit? Just 17 more years? But they can go faster than light, cure almost all diseases, and replicate any food on a whim? Not bloody likely. Besides, "Archer" may be another person entirely.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
well in some novels it's stated that mccoy is one of the oldest humans alive. However in those novels mccoy is 150. So that's pretty darn old. People can live to be 120 today but they aren't exactly lucid or mobile. McCoy can still walk, talk, eat, etc. There's only one archer. :)
hoppers001 2 years ago
Meeehhhhh... The books aren't canon the way they are for Star Wars. ...Unfortunately. There's a lot of good stuff in there (and, apparently, Orci is fond of them to the point of integrating some of their ideas into the new films; a lot of "Best Destiny" and "Enterprise: the First Adventure" is in the 2009 film).
The bigger continuity issue is this: during the library computer sequence of "In a Mirror, Darkly, Part II," Archer's ulimate fate is said to be death from natural causes in 2245.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
Yeah I know. It's a pity because a lot of trek books are good. In my opinion archer lived too long. Trip, malcolm, travis, hoshi they all died long before archer did.
hoppers001 2 years ago
Of course, the screen was never meant to be seen that clearly, and we only know it said that because the original graphic was posted online, so it's a question if that's canon at all. ALSO, the timeline SKEWS (if you'll pardon the Doc Brown quotation) into this alternate tangent in 2233, which may very well have completely changed the circumstances of Arhcer's later life. Although I think we can all agree the "prized beagle" is not Porthos. Humas may live longer, but no dog will live to 110!
DarthFastidious 2 years ago
So nero affects archer's last 12 years of life big deal, it's not like archer will change that much. Maybe they have some kind of super dog food in the 22nd century. :) I mean come on in enterprise Porthos was like 14 years old.
hoppers001 2 years ago
i went into the movie thinking it would be crap but i couldnt have been more wrong! a truly fantastic film!
Myamura 2 years ago
this movie is very geat...........very great
biolagia 2 years ago 3
well probably not she was a science officer half way across the ship from any escape pod so its unlikely in the 10 tops of 15 seconds to get there even though that seen was scary and where austin healey died =]
666DarkEgo 2 years ago
best movie score since Rudy!
plincoln21 2 years ago
So I'm assuming you haven't seen any films since Rudy.
thanks51 2 years ago
LOL
adwadle 2 years ago
i seen movie does that green lady die over vulcan where the fleet is destroyed??
666DarkEgo 2 years ago
maybe....
she could also get to an escapebot...
have sum fantasy man! =)
antiheld666 2 years ago
jj outdone it this time great movie
and brilliant song
gokiludo 2 years ago
I am lovingggg this soundtrack
best one since Carribean
stuipdthing 2 years ago
If you want to see Star Trek the movie for free, follow this link:
moviem*tv/action/star-trek/
replace * with dot
NeobuxAdvisor 2 years ago
search 'Star Trek 11 2009 OST #01 Star Trek' some guys uploaded the whole official theme album!
4instanceuk 2 years ago
Hes right up there with Jerry Goldsmith!!!
SonicFFCoCreator 2 years ago
an absolutely amazing film..a MUST OWN on blu-ray or DVD.
ive grown up with star trek and hated how bland and boring it became the last 10 years, but JESUS CHRIST, i was not prepaired for what JJ Abrams was going to do.
this isnt just THE GREATEST STAR TREK MOVIE EVER, it might just be the best film of 2009.
a gripping non-stop action film that grabs you from the first scene and NEVER lets go.
SEE THIS MOVIE .
If this is any indication of the new series of films count me in.
amazing film
erok8150 2 years ago 9
It has a sence of Halo in it! My God THIS MOVIE ROCKS THIS IS HOW THE STAR WARS PREQUELS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE!!!!!
SonicFFCoCreator 2 years ago 2
im with you count me in:)
gokiludo 2 years ago
i saw it twice. first, in amc then in imax
PichuPikaRai0001 2 years ago
I love this piece of music its sooo good!
collingsshow 2 years ago
Best star trek ever. i wasnt that much into it until i saw this one!! and what can i say i loved it! and not only chris pine was Fn HOT!!!! ahhh
sawatdeecaAZXD 2 years ago 4
best movie yet this year. LOVED IT!!! i heard rumors that the DVD comes out Septemberish. i really hope it comes sooner though.
capclub2124 2 years ago 3
the movie was completely amazing! the best one i've seen in a while....loved it! i totally want to see it again ;)
grilledpickles 2 years ago 5
Would be cool if they Started a New Series with the Cast from the Movie that would be awsome.
samusaran11 2 years ago 4
Yeah I totally agree with you :D
Serendis 2 years ago
Well there doing a trilogy of films with that cast so you'll see them on the enterprise again ut it would be hard to get hollywood actors to work on a tv show.
XtremeGoose 2 years ago
Well there they signed up for two more films :D
Bluestudiosuk 2 years ago 3
Yea but a New TV Series would draw in a New Crowd of Fans to the Series.
The Next Movie wont be until 2011 that i read on a Website.
samusaran11 2 years ago 2
The Greatest Star Trek movie ever!!!!!
SonicFFCoCreator 2 years ago
it was genius... but that title remains safetley in the hands of... Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!
TheDeistAngle 2 years ago
Only someone in their teens or early twenties would rank this film over Wrath of Khan.
thanks51 2 years ago
Wrath of Khan was hard to beat. This one came close though.
Stitchman3875 2 years ago 3
I agree with this, but not in a negative sense. Wrath of Khan is about growing old, while the new 'Star Trek' is reflective of more youthful passion. Kids are going to connect to it more than Wrath of Khan, while the older generation is, naturally, going to make fun of us (the youthful generation) for liking it more. I think both movies are fantastic, but I like this Trek more because it appeals more to me at my current point in life. Movies affect people at different points in their life.
KagamiismyLover 2 years ago 29
Well said!
ensignr 2 years ago
@KagamiismyLover i saw The Wrath of Khan in the theaters when i was 9 years old … and knew instantly it was a great film THEN! a great story is a great story no matter what age group is portrayed . JJ needs to take a few directing lessons from Nick Meyer
joeylodes 1 year ago
@KagamiismyLover I'm 45 and love this movie best of all. I can"t wait for more.
baalisgod666 1 year ago
Khan was THE BEST VILLAIN EVER. For me, Eric Bana's villain was the only weak part of this film.
blkchk 2 years ago 2
Khannn! Khannn! Khannn! LOL
IntermittentSprocket 2 years ago
In the movie, when Eric Banner is yelling "Spooooock! Spoooock!" it reminded me of that.
blkchk 2 years ago
the new BSG not the old one
stimpackjunky2 2 years ago
I saw the movie twice as well and i have to that the movie is flawless! Stargate is way to cheesy for my taste.Battlestar Galactica will always be my show.
stimpackjunky2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I too am a Stargate fan, althought I have watched the entire Voyager series, some of TNG and DS9 and also I have dabbled in Enterprise, but I have always thought that the original series was just too tacky and cheap. This film however is phoenominal and the visual effects are astounding. No wonder when they were done by ILM who did Jurassic Park. I am still more of a Stargate fan than I will ever be a Star Trek fan but this film has made me realise Star Trek is still alive and well.
Oriworshiper 2 years ago
Comment removed
Oriworshiper 2 years ago
Nero was a dick.
JannieRosen 2 years ago
AssWhooper I agree with you im a Stargate fan, and i watched the odd enterprise episode but when i saw this movie i was like "HOLY FUCK" I want this on dvd NOW! lol
bates1888 2 years ago
I've never been a fan of "Star trek", I always refused to watch the T.V. show, but I must say that the movie was brilliant, I may give the T.V. show a chance now that I've watched the movie!
AssWhoopper 2 years ago 2
Can't help but feel sorry for Nero at the end, all he wanted was his vengeance.
riptor3086 2 years ago
This Is One Of The Best Movies Made On This Planet. And It Has A Great Soundtrack To It
Jaymetal101 2 years ago
Cause you watched in theaters, wait till you watch it a second time, doesn't really have that much re watch value.
riptor3086 2 years ago
It depends on what type of person you are say you are like a person who can watch it over and over again like me
Jaymetal101 2 years ago
Then you suck !
riptor3086 2 years ago
Actually I've seen it twice now and it was as good the second time as the first.
quickbeamishasty 2 years ago
I love this new theme of all things I started humming it when I left theaters. Oh and the movie's fun too.
GeneralBulldog54 2 years ago 3
haha ^^ me too xD laaaalalalalaaaaaaa
quitschgelb 2 years ago
I know what you mean, I've been humming it ever since.
Phynkesia 2 years ago
The movie was fantastic. I'm proud to be a Trekkie.
besomethingmore 2 years ago 4
me too!
NiteOwl1224 2 years ago
i really really loved this movie even more after hearing this sound track in the movie's official website. :)