Added: 3 years ago
From: GerbilGod7
Views: 72,366
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (136)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At first i was like...hes fast at that rubiks...then i was like...oh...hes asian

  • its 7 sec the robot and the recort human is 5 so?

  • of couse hes Asian

  • Rubot is better. It scans itself and has better manipulators.

  • How did I know he was Asian before I saw his face....

  • Of course the actual guy that solves it is asian... typical....

  • @5thmsg AND makes the machine...

  • Funny, he looks just like Yu Nakajima, the 2007 Wold Champion.

  • @dethmetal134

    If you are counting each move the machine makes, It actually only takes 21 moves.

  • o well i could never beat him.... hes asian

  • @dethmetal134

    That's the exact reason why these machines are made, modified, copied, worked on every year. A computer, no matter how complicated, no matter what type of programming, no matter how much "power" is behind it, cannot begin to process data like the human mind can.

    Also, no computerized system or "AI" can develop its own original thought. Everything it knows and does, everything it spits out, it has been told. It cannot truly "learn" anything.

  • @i8246i You say that now, but just give these guys 50-100 years and they will invent something even more intelligent than you and me.

  • If you think that was quick, check out this Rubik's cube solver that I just found: watch?v=2_I3x_XF7Ss

  • All it did was undo it's movements.

  • @dethmetal134 Just in case you were wondering (you probs know by now) but the number at which a cube can be solved, or "God's Number" is 20.

  • @BpenguinFire it could be one if you only moved one section of the cube

  • @dethmetal134 The method for solving a rubik's cube is basically a equation, so input what colours you currently have and the equation tells you what to turn, so its the same with the robot, it scans the colours and just inputs it into a programmed equation, then it knows which way to turn, then it re scans and processes it again the same way we would if we knew the equation :D

  • I was like holy crap, a white guy that can do something quick and smart.... then the camera went up and he was asian....

  • wow even the guy looked like a robot when he was trying to solve it

  • omfg the robot has basic memory it just remebered where it was before oh wow.

  • never mind the fucking robot ,i carnt even do it like that person did ,ive had about 4 rubix cubes and never solved it not even close 

  • Wouldn't the robot just have to reverse what it did a little while ago when it scrambled the cube?

  • @dethmetal134 its 20 or less moves

  • lol new world record holder of the rubiks cube shelly the octopus

  • that robot can solve the cube just if it's sacramble that way!!!!!!!! great robot!!! hahaha

  • @dethmetal134 the robot did it in 21 moves.

    and any cube can be solved at 19 moves, so the robot wasn't far off.

  • "12 seconds not bad" i timed 18 buddy... learn to count.

  • @Mdaske The bloke said "about 12 seconds " it was actually 15 secs , so he was 3 seconds off without time to set his stop watch. lol .

  • Yeh, im not quite as fast but, im still asian!

  • WOOHOO GO CAL BERKELY!!!!!!!

  • It's a matter of algorhythms... funny, indeed.

  • Why do you people keep saying it doesn't solve the cube? It obviously does - you watch it scramble and unscramble.

  • it just does the scramble backwards! its not really solving it!

  • @TheGbpackr It's true, the computer arranges the cube just like the scrambled one, and basically rewinds. If the guy put the scrambled one inside the machine, and it solved it, maybe it'd be more impressive.

  • @kt2005 - insert a scambled cube into the machine? You mean like with "Yellow Cube Machine" "MultiCuber" and "CubeStormer" to mention a few... ;-)

  • @IAssemble Yah, this one isn't as impressive as the ones you named.

  • yea, but to figure out how to scramble it. granted, it could have just reverse what it did, but you watched the machine scan then scramble the cube, so it obviously needs algorithms to know how how to scramble it to match the original cube.

  • wow...the robot and the guys sure are very good in cubing

  • race the robot!!

  • cool

  • DANG THAT WAS AWSOME!!!

  • Awsome! Now try the Rubik 360 sphere!

    That looks great too. Gonna buy one when available.

  • very cool, but i like the "rubot" better.. it scans the unsolved cube on its own, then solves it

  • the robot solve isnt that fair D: all it has to do is play the unscramble backwords, just faster... it doesnt seem that hard..

  • funny, because first it has to figure out how to scramble the cube so it looks the same - sure needs some algorithms ;)

  • Jesus.... he can solve a Rubik's Cube pretty fast

    No not the robot but that guy

  • 22 moves is the current number

    (and still decreasing)

  • Pretty cool. But the robot kind of cheated... the original cube was solved. then he scanned in the mixed up cube. the computer did match the solved cube to the mixed up cube. but the "wow" of the machine was when it solved it... it already had the solve information in it... he just had to hit an undo button.

  • The orginal mixing it to match the hand held cube was very cool. but the solved was nothing impressive.

  • it's weird, ppl solve rubik's cube for FUN. And what, they build a robot to do it so the robot can have fun?

  • what?

    robots cant have fun too?

  • You just assumed the robots have emotion .

  • so?

    maybe they have emotions.

    we just don't know that they do........

  • Yeah, may be or may be not.

    So why work your butt off for something you are not even certain of? That just doesn't make sense. Plus, I don't think the Rubik's-cube-solving-robot would be very grateful as it has to solve rubik cubes24/7, admit it, it would become very annoying and boring; and the robot won't have fun too as the fun in solving rubik's cube is becoz its challenging, and obviously its not challenging for the computer program to solve it.

  • good point.........

  • Thats just insane,

  • Going from any configuration to a predefined one, whether it's One-Color-Per-Side or not, is hard. Still, it's only able to do it in so few moves so quickly because of the lethal combination of clever human-generated algorithms and rapid & accurate machine computing power.

    What I read was that it's proven you can go from any configuration to solved (or any other configuration of course) in 22 moves or less. And new mathematical proofs are still lowering that number.

  • lol once i scrambles it all it has to do is go in reverse of whit it just did so really its not solving it

  • No, it's a solve. A scramble is always 25 moves, whereas a computer can always solve the cube in 23 or less moves.

    So it's not going in reverse, and even if it was, it would still be solving as long as the scramble is unknown.

  • hehe haha 6 seconds, lolz no world record for you, to bad you have to count scan time to... took you like 26 seconds...

  • it cant turn the middle ones so it has to work diffrently.

  • omg that was realy dumb, the middle peaces CANT move -.-

  • no he means the middle layer, in notation its called M

    is where instead of l' L' you jut do M and its the same move

  • lol u tink dont know what a M is xD

  • omg they cant move on ANY RUBIKS CUBE.

  • lol on a 2x2,4x4 and 6x6 they move dumbass ;)

  • you cant turn the middle ones on any cube retard. Besides the 4x4,6x6, and 8x8, (even numbered cubes.)

  • o really.. why dont u think again noob...

    u just turn the top and bottom rows to the left or right then the middle column up..

    PWNED

  • Have you ever seen the core of a 3x3? Its fixed. You cant get 2 opposite colors next to each other. I dare you to try to get the red and orange centers next to each other. On even numbered cubes you can do that.

    PWNED

  • Comment removed

  • but you can tell he fixed it so he could solve it easy

  • damn he is fast

  • crap i just thought of an idea this second.....a fukin self solvin rubiks cube

  • done........

    -either rubiks touch (not sure that is the right namer)(in devolepment)

    - or clip motion.

    wright it on youtube.

  • It seriously did generate the sequence when it was inputting the muddled cube, then simply reversed that to 'solve' it, however the solving part was actually as it muddled.

  • That's a freaking epic robot.

  • its not fake theres a person walkinf forward when he does it

  • he had to be asian....

  • hey the robot cheated!, it just revers the sequence a lot faster

  • is it cheating to get the exact scramble right???

    sounds harder then solving the cube

  • but y niples?

  • thats our nipples when robots  start takeing over :I

  • HAHAHAA

  • bet it cant solve mine...

  • nice job, you flipped the stickers, or blocks, or whatever.Of course it can't solve you're because it's broken. retard.

  • actualy its a 3x5x7 so you fail. retard.

  • I am so sick of fucks like you. Why is it so hard for you to keep your ill informed comments to yourself?

  • likewise. reread you're comment

  • i see what your saying you mean rubik's revolution, but i think its just a rubik's cube with the middles removed

  • i know how it does it, when the computer is scanning the cube, the machine knows all the colors on all faces, it then scrambles it to look just like the other cube. When it scrambles it, the machine knows exactly what moves it did tho scramble, so it just reversed the scrambling to solve it. Therefore the most impressive thing this robot can do is scramble the cube to look exactly like the other cube.:P

  • heyy douche in essence that's still exactly like sovling it... *sigh..... think about it if the already unsolved cube was in (the machine) and the machine didnt have to unscramble it then it would still have the scans and use the same algorithms to solve it... nice try to sound smart though

  • cal

    i live near there

  • Well, it's pretty cool... but I have to wonder, if it took it a while to mix up, then a few seconds to solve, couldn't it just run the process it used to mix up the cube backwards?

    :D It's cool, though XD I need one...

  • that's pretty amazing. and pretty dorky.

  • are you kidding me it takes me like 3-5 min to solve one of those

  • Lol 3-5 min for like one side. then i fuck up and end up breaking it XD

  • Holy shit. Even the human's good

  • The human, lol.

  • @0onarcissisto0 but hes asain, so....

  • Crazy!

  • pwnage

  • he seems well educated and intelligent, but is he smart?

  • nice job

  • I've seen a simpler (and efficient) version of this robot at the "Festival della creatività" in Florence (Italy) in 2007...

  • lol of course no offense but hes asian asian ppl r good at things like tat

  • dude not cool that rasist!

  • how is that racist when it's a complement?

    (RACIST. Not RASIST.)

  • thats you noob

  • looks good but all computer has to do is reverse wot its just done.

  • The solution is always shorter than 25 move scramble, there's always a shorter solution than 25 moves ;)

  • wow the guy is fast

  • Do Asians always have to be the incredible people.

  • no..

  • Do people like you always have envy people rather then be happy for them?

    You (anyone) could be good at many things, if you just got your ass off your chair, and worked hard at something.

  • holy shit fucking asians

  • thx :)

  • uh...since he goes to the mixed up version, couldnt it just be that he just have a button that resets it to the original solved version?

  • wow! is cool

  • wow that's awesome!!!!

  • awesome 5/5

  • He went to a lot of trouble to build a machine to do a useless job that he is already amazingly good at- what a funny commentary about our obsession with technology.

  • He went through a lot of trouble to build a machine to do a job that he is already amazingly good at in about half the time.

    Or alternatively:

    He had a lot of fun building a machine on a topic he enjoys.

    Either way, it seems like the only funny commentary is yours.

  • That's not that crazy if you think about it.

    It already took a solved cube and scrambled it, all it has to do is make every move in reverse. the guy on the other hand was impressive.

  • actually, the algorithm doesn't begin by scrambling it randomly. it probably can solve for any arrangement, and just solves once for the "random" input, and once for the actual solved cube

  • woooo asian power

  • im more amazed at the guy lol

  • WORD! O_O

  • wow that is cool

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more