The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.
The universal attraction law of the Newton is the UNIFIED LAW because all those three fundamental interactions: the nuclear interaction, the electromagnetic(electron-proto¬n) interaction and the gravitational interaction are interactions produced through the ethereal matter, what bind the classical physics of the good part of the modern physics, but it bind and the ETHEREAL PHYSICS.
The UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION LAW it apply identically to the movement the atoms of the ethereal matters, identically to the movement the atoms of the chemical elements, identically to the movement the planets and stars of the one galaxy, because any body of any dimension possess a mass and thus is subdued the newtonian forces of interaction.
The INERTIAL MOVE from matter produce the gravitational field, and the gravity with her particles ties the macrocosmos with microcosmos and influenced all what exists sitting thus at the general existence basis. The UNIFIED LAW of matter's forces I can say with cetainly that it exists from some hundred years and is Newton's universal attraction law.
The “GRAVITY” is a radiation and an electromagnetic quadripolar field between two bodies. The gravity is not a chemical fixed bound, but is an elastic bound, which accompanys all those four states of aggregation of the matter: solid, liquid, gaseous and ethereal.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the STANDARD MODEL of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
Any body is accompanied of a personal ether.When it combine two substances, it combine and those two personal ethers, giving birth at another substances with another personal ether, which give body a certain colour and certain properties. Whole what is solid on Earth is impregnated with his personal ether with the more greatest density from the thousands of sorts of ethers.The liquids have them personal ether some rare and gases have them personal ether more rare and diaphanos
But the seen matter: gaseous, liquid and solid remain not single in her existence, but is dressed, interpenetrated and driven by ethereal matter. Neither an atom of the whose chemical element can exist not, without existence in each atom to one personal part of ethereal matter, which hold him concentrated, which active him and on which hold him in material exchenge with the environing medium, with the others bodies.
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
• In 1881, the physicist Joseph John Thomson discover the electromagnetic mass, whenever infer that the mass a one object it alter once with addition an one electrical load! In 1928, the physicist Arnold Sommerfeld discover that in a electrical conductor, the electrons it involves as a altered gas, and only a few electrons of great energy participate at electrical conduction.
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRICAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
D.I.Mendeleev had shown therough 1860 that the ether's matter - the ether's atoms - represent itself the primary matter, from which are formed all the chemical atoms. And that is possibly and necessary the elaboration and one another periodical system, for other order of dimension - more small, for the atoms of the ethereal substances. M.Faraday had the certitude that exist an incomplete vacuum to whose magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
Quantum mechanics goes directly to religious questions and makes the idea of Creator useless, because one of the conclusion of it states that things got created without any reason at any moment of the time... So author, kill yourself
All I see in this one is the Quantum Mechanics field theory. Maybe you should have named it that. As far as religion and science is concerned they both occupy two different places. One should not tell the other what to do or what is right or wrong unless one has a degree in that field. But neither field should infringe on the other's domain . This is a historical problem and is still one today. God does not teach us technology God teaches us what is the right thing to do morally.
the universe operate information and energy just like you computer does with electricity. there is no real difference between electrical signals in a computer and those in your brain. the only difference is that your brain operate high frequent pulses as hight voltage tesla discharges into an interference of plasma current. the same thing happen in the universe a a whole. deep down its just interference patterns of waves all of it. particles are needed to make the math work with constants.
if you want to have a true scientific discussion then don't through in the word God in your professional discussion unless you don't wan't people to look at you like you're a nut.
It's interesting to see a video stating observable facts and information, coupled with a well done presentation, being given a thumbs down. Perhaps the most humorous aspect of it all is that we haven't even gotten to the God part yet. Interesting. Thank you for this video. It is going in my favorites, hopefully to be accompanied by the rest of this series. Cheers.
@UNFFwildcard Right the Muslims have been brainwashed to believe all sorts of nonsense. That's why their countries are so backwards. This brainwash does not help them in the least. It's time to do some reality check if they want to join civilization.
@samgee2007 If Islam were so great, Islamic countries wouldn't be so backward. Christianity --especially starting at the time of the Reformation-- brought about by far the most advanced civilization the planet has ever known and by an extremely large margin, in terms of science, technology, social justice, etc. One must judge a tree at its fruit.
@AlloBruxelles you call us advanced, and yet, there are so many arguments against that. scientifically, we're finding out just how little we know about the universe. sure, we have some pretty good approximations of reality, but no theory is absolutely perfect. technologically, we're more advanced than we ever have been before, but this can be said of most points in history, but not all. ie dark ages. Social justice? you surely jest. our society is full of hypocrisy and injustice left and right.
@me835 You missed my point. It was all about relativity: "If Islam were so great, ISLAMIC COUNTRIES WOULDN'T BE SO BACKWRD. Christianity --especially starting at the time of the Reformation-- brought about by far the MOST advanced civilization the planet has ever known and BY AN EXTREMELY LARGE MARGIN, in terms of science, technology, social justice, etc. One must judge a tree at its fruit." It's a work in progress of course. The gap between the West and the Muslim countries is abysmal!
@me835 ... besides, we are in a post-Christian era in the West and it shows in many areas...
It seems also that we have gotten it wrong in theoretical physics e.g. judging how little fundamental progress has been made over the last decades... something fundamentally wrong with our assumptions probably...
You fucking barbaric assholes have nothing to do but to randomly waste internet space for your desperately shitty religion and can't even put a meaningful sentence together! LOL
This is very interesting in many levels, one because I've always been interested in the nature of the universe through Einstein's eyes. This does shead new 'light' on what was in his mind and my understanding. Keep it up!
It is interesting that we hear so much about the quest to achieve absolute zero, but so little about any efforts to achieve a maximum temperature. I would guess that a lot of mysterious (and perhaps useful) phenomena would occur at extremely high temperatures, just as superconductivity and superfluidity occur near absolute zero.
I think its because its easier, and because the resultant products are stable. You could perhaps get some interesting phenomena, but it gets hard to study it when the nuclei are breaking apart.
@thund3rCR4CK3R I'd say we're closer to being able to hit absolute zero than absolute maximum. God knows what absolute maximum even is haha. I'd imagine absolute maximum would trigger nuclear fission in every atom in its path starting a chain reaction that would wipe the whole planet out long before it died down. Then again what the hell would I know.
Max Planck is the genius behind the Quantum paradigm shift with his quantum theory and discovery of quanta, but I still argue that the discovery of Cathode rays by Michael Faraday and the beautiful equations of Maxwell are the foundation of quantum mechanics, or would you say the pre-foundation of quantum mechanics.
Who would you consider the founder of the paradigm shift, and who would you consider the person who most contributed to it?
While you're right that Maxwell and Faraday made important contributions to quantum mechanics, I said Planck started it simply because quantum mechanics is literally named after the light quanta that he proposed.
@ogirv101 Maxwell's equations are the foundation for Special Relativity, the pure classical shit, and I don't understand how you could make connection with quantum shits... Maybe you are just lack of knowledge. Your comment is 2 years old, hope you got smarter
that was pretty much the introduction to quantum mechanics I had in my physical chemistry class and you seen to understand it well enough to explain it.
Looking forward to the continuation of the series
I am doing my best to see the connection with quantum physics and God. I am by no way claiming I know, I just do not yet see what duality and particles physics has to do with God. Although I do like the direction this is heading. In search of the GOD particle, what ever that may be it's just a thought .
I don't exactly understand how this applies to anything regarding god and religion yet, but I'm sure you will get to it soon enough (assuming I haven't missed something).
All your points and arguments lean towards Deism and a Deist God. Yahweh is not God and his "holy word" is not consistent with the Creation. God's natural laws are all that is needed to govern the universe. God gave us reason, not religion!
Your made up God doesn't exist. Lacking a primary attribute, it has no identity, and cannot instantiate secondary or relational attributes, as it lacks kinetic actuality, and kinetic potentiality.
While I agree that god does not exist, I think it is wrong to attack someone like djarm67 for his belief. He, along with UNFFwildcard, accept all scientific proof. Their belief in a god is not harmful because they do not try to go against science. Along with people like Ken Miller, these are the people that need to be heard. Religion is not going away, so when they show that you can still accept science and believe in god, it is beneficial. They are not preaching, so what is so bad about it?
Which video did he insult you in? I'm subscribed to him and I don't recall it. I'd like to check your claim.
Even if it is true, I'd still advise against such a direct attack in this particular comment section as it seems misplaced and out of context. If you have a debate ongoing with Djarm67 on this topic I'd say keep it to the appropriate comment lists so people can follow it in it's entirity.
One final point, christian tenets are as diverse as christians themselves... ;)
A) He insulted me on a Knowntje video, calling me a spammer. Which, not only do I find insulting, but was a lie, since I didn't spam his videos, or channel,and he has no proof of such. Spamming is a subjective insult anyway. Any comment someone finds disagreeable, could be labelled "spam".
B) Your comment about "direct attack", was appallingly self-righteous and exaggerated. if you want to see a verbal attack, I'll give you one. That's not it.
A) I asked you which video, please be specific. You claim he insulted you - I want to see it. It's a positive claim so I'd like you to provide evidence of it. Not doing so will pretty much invalidate your claim, certainly in my eyes.
B) Your comment was a direct attack because all it did was attack djarm67's personal beliefs. It had nothing to do with the video or the comment posted. Was it vulgar? No. But it was a direct attack because it had no other purpose.
Okay I watched the video, which was a debunking of one of yours. Thus you were the topic at hand. I found DJarm67's comment in which he does indeed call you a spammer... He claims you spammed his channel comments several times. Looking through his channel comments back about eight months there are numerous posts by you to him and the vast majority are aggressive and insulting.
Now, that is no comment on the validity or not of the points you raised, merely on the way you raised them...
Your aggressive nature coupled with your inability to 'agree to disagree' could well bring you under the umbrella of a spammer. I don't mean that as an insult, merely an observation - as you say yourself, the status of spammer is a subjective one.
I find it odd that you would be so insulted by that word considering the vast amounts of insults you yourself use as a matter of course... In our short exchange you have called me self righteous and declared me beneath your insults...
I don't mind really, but it does seem to edge you towards the realm of hypocrite.
I also note that in the video you cite, Knowntje claims to have unblocked you. If this is the case, why not comment there? Why comment here instead on a video with the weakest of links to the topic you raise.
Also, why have that running exchange on DJ's profile comments rather than have it in PMs, which would provide you both with more space to flesh out your arguments and sources?
You can side with people who take away the free speech of others on subjective whim and petty disagreement all you want. Judging by what I've seen of you, it surprises me NONE.
This is what I was talking about when I mentioned your inability to 'agree to disagree'.
I went to the trouble of trying to verify your claim and on reflection, did not think it was warranted.
You could just accept that I don't, nor do I have to, agree with you and move on. You didn't though... and this is the kind of behaviour which, over a couple of weeks, would warrant the term spammer.
You claim DJ took away your free speech? Your comments are still up on his profile for all to see...
you are a pretentious hypocrite. I'm not saying that conclusively, but it looks that way. Since you are telling me to agree to disagree, you could do the same and stop replying to me. Not doing so, you are guilty of what you are accusing me of, which is not agreeing to disagree, and let it go.
B) When someone bans you, it doesn't automatically mean they also deleted your comments. What's wrong with you?
B) This is the first time you mentioned him banning you. You left a comment one day ago on his page... as far as I know you can't leave comments on profiles of people who've blocked you.
The point about agreeing to disagree would not have been raised if I had not posted.
But, in that mode, I agree to disagree with your claim that DJ insulted you and that you are not a spammer.
'djarm67 has insulted me on a prior video, and has engaged in subjective, Fascist censorship.'
You mean this? Point to the part in that sentence that says DJ banned you...
'^^^As far as I know, you can be unblocked,
after getting blocked. '
Unblocking some one is the act of a 'fascist censor'?
Really?
REALLY?
I notice you rejected my suggestion to move on... seems it doesn't matter if I want to agree to disagree or not... you are still going to spam my comments.
Considering the pendantic nature of so many of your comments, you don't get to be this fuzzy with your words... That would be hypocracy.
You say your blocking was unjustified. I disagree, from the evidence. Blocking has its place for getting rid of trolls and those who just throw insults.
Your continual insults are grounds enough to ban you from a channel.
One wonders why you feel the need to present such an aggressive persona.
Well, let's see. You have insinuated insults to me, that I'm a troll, a spammer,
insulting, and aggressive. So that's hypocritical on your part. You keep talking about agreeing to disagree, and moving on, but you refuse to move on, and seem insistent on getting in the last word. So you're being a hypocrite there.
Thanks for the series. It's nice to see a believer in god not resort to lies and distortions.
I am curious, however, what part a god does play in the universe. If, as you've mentioned, the big bang, abiogenesis, and evolution is true, it would appear that the universe is capable of managing itself without a god figure. So where does your idea of god come into play?
Again, thanks for this series. I've subscribed. :)
Someone mentioned on Agnosticman's channel that DonExodus recently claimed to be an agnostic on one of his videos in the comment section. That blew me away. Don't know if it's true though.
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The universal attraction law of the Newton is the UNIFIED LAW because all those three fundamental interactions: the nuclear interaction, the electromagnetic(electron-proto¬n) interaction and the gravitational interaction are interactions produced through the ethereal matter, what bind the classical physics of the good part of the modern physics, but it bind and the ETHEREAL PHYSICS.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION LAW it apply identically to the movement the atoms of the ethereal matters, identically to the movement the atoms of the chemical elements, identically to the movement the planets and stars of the one galaxy, because any body of any dimension possess a mass and thus is subdued the newtonian forces of interaction.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The INERTIAL MOVE from matter produce the gravitational field, and the gravity with her particles ties the macrocosmos with microcosmos and influenced all what exists sitting thus at the general existence basis. The UNIFIED LAW of matter's forces I can say with cetainly that it exists from some hundred years and is Newton's universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The “GRAVITY” is a radiation and an electromagnetic quadripolar field between two bodies. The gravity is not a chemical fixed bound, but is an elastic bound, which accompanys all those four states of aggregation of the matter: solid, liquid, gaseous and ethereal.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the STANDARD MODEL of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Any body is accompanied of a personal ether.When it combine two substances, it combine and those two personal ethers, giving birth at another substances with another personal ether, which give body a certain colour and certain properties. Whole what is solid on Earth is impregnated with his personal ether with the more greatest density from the thousands of sorts of ethers.The liquids have them personal ether some rare and gases have them personal ether more rare and diaphanos
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
But the seen matter: gaseous, liquid and solid remain not single in her existence, but is dressed, interpenetrated and driven by ethereal matter. Neither an atom of the whose chemical element can exist not, without existence in each atom to one personal part of ethereal matter, which hold him concentrated, which active him and on which hold him in material exchenge with the environing medium, with the others bodies.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
• In 1881, the physicist Joseph John Thomson discover the electromagnetic mass, whenever infer that the mass a one object it alter once with addition an one electrical load! In 1928, the physicist Arnold Sommerfeld discover that in a electrical conductor, the electrons it involves as a altered gas, and only a few electrons of great energy participate at electrical conduction.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRICAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
D.I.Mendeleev had shown therough 1860 that the ether's matter - the ether's atoms - represent itself the primary matter, from which are formed all the chemical atoms. And that is possibly and necessary the elaboration and one another periodical system, for other order of dimension - more small, for the atoms of the ethereal substances. M.Faraday had the certitude that exist an incomplete vacuum to whose magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
Quantum mechanics goes directly to religious questions and makes the idea of Creator useless, because one of the conclusion of it states that things got created without any reason at any moment of the time... So author, kill yourself
mappingtheshit 3 months ago
All I see in this one is the Quantum Mechanics field theory. Maybe you should have named it that. As far as religion and science is concerned they both occupy two different places. One should not tell the other what to do or what is right or wrong unless one has a degree in that field. But neither field should infringe on the other's domain . This is a historical problem and is still one today. God does not teach us technology God teaches us what is the right thing to do morally.
alaudun2 5 months ago
the universe operate information and energy just like you computer does with electricity. there is no real difference between electrical signals in a computer and those in your brain. the only difference is that your brain operate high frequent pulses as hight voltage tesla discharges into an interference of plasma current. the same thing happen in the universe a a whole. deep down its just interference patterns of waves all of it. particles are needed to make the math work with constants.
coldarc 7 months ago
information and energy are equivalent. mass is just information divided energy.
coldarc 7 months ago
Right on, Spot on, and Bring it on - Fantastic potential for the correlation between the Creation and the Creator- Mike Wood
MikeWood42 11 months ago
I thought this was a video on philosophy not on quantum mechanics.
natedaug1 1 year ago
E= MC^2 is not the full equation either and quit plagiarizing a god into science.
onthecuttingedge2005 1 year ago
if you want to have a true scientific discussion then don't through in the word God in your professional discussion unless you don't wan't people to look at you like you're a nut.
onthecuttingedge2005 1 year ago
It's interesting to see a video stating observable facts and information, coupled with a well done presentation, being given a thumbs down. Perhaps the most humorous aspect of it all is that we haven't even gotten to the God part yet. Interesting. Thank you for this video. It is going in my favorites, hopefully to be accompanied by the rest of this series. Cheers.
LucrativeLucius 1 year ago
turn down your mic. i dont wanna hear your saliva.
cosmosgod 1 year ago
Who the F#%$ are giving you so many thumbs down?
I thought your presentation was great and all based on facts!
jessica5666 1 year ago
Pretty good video.
BogMonkey53 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
muslim scholars already knew this idea long before christians come to know about it!..so this proves islamic greatness.
samgee2007 1 year ago
@samgee2007
Like who? Now you got me interested :)
UNFFwildcard 1 year ago
@UNFFwildcard ! hey ratard read al quran everything is there.I know you are trying to redicule islam!.....buzz off
samgee2007 1 year ago
@UNFFwildcard Right the Muslims have been brainwashed to believe all sorts of nonsense. That's why their countries are so backwards. This brainwash does not help them in the least. It's time to do some reality check if they want to join civilization.
AlloBruxelles 1 year ago
@samgee2007 If Islam were so great, Islamic countries wouldn't be so backward. Christianity --especially starting at the time of the Reformation-- brought about by far the most advanced civilization the planet has ever known and by an extremely large margin, in terms of science, technology, social justice, etc. One must judge a tree at its fruit.
AlloBruxelles 1 year ago 2
@AlloBruxelles you call us advanced, and yet, there are so many arguments against that. scientifically, we're finding out just how little we know about the universe. sure, we have some pretty good approximations of reality, but no theory is absolutely perfect. technologically, we're more advanced than we ever have been before, but this can be said of most points in history, but not all. ie dark ages. Social justice? you surely jest. our society is full of hypocrisy and injustice left and right.
me835 1 year ago
@me835 You missed my point. It was all about relativity: "If Islam were so great, ISLAMIC COUNTRIES WOULDN'T BE SO BACKWRD. Christianity --especially starting at the time of the Reformation-- brought about by far the MOST advanced civilization the planet has ever known and BY AN EXTREMELY LARGE MARGIN, in terms of science, technology, social justice, etc. One must judge a tree at its fruit." It's a work in progress of course. The gap between the West and the Muslim countries is abysmal!
AlloBruxelles 1 year ago
@me835 ... besides, we are in a post-Christian era in the West and it shows in many areas...
It seems also that we have gotten it wrong in theoretical physics e.g. judging how little fundamental progress has been made over the last decades... something fundamentally wrong with our assumptions probably...
AlloBruxelles 1 year ago
@samgee2007
Fuck off retarded illiterate shitlim!
You fucking barbaric assholes have nothing to do but to randomly waste internet space for your desperately shitty religion and can't even put a meaningful sentence together! LOL
jessica5666 1 year ago
@samgee2007 yeah, who and when??
kairon156 1 year ago
This is very interesting in many levels, one because I've always been interested in the nature of the universe through Einstein's eyes. This does shead new 'light' on what was in his mind and my understanding. Keep it up!
Eloeem 2 years ago
It is interesting that we hear so much about the quest to achieve absolute zero, but so little about any efforts to achieve a maximum temperature. I would guess that a lot of mysterious (and perhaps useful) phenomena would occur at extremely high temperatures, just as superconductivity and superfluidity occur near absolute zero.
thund3rCR4CK3R 2 years ago
@thund3rCR4CK3R
I think its because its easier, and because the resultant products are stable. You could perhaps get some interesting phenomena, but it gets hard to study it when the nuclei are breaking apart.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
@thund3rCR4CK3R I'd say we're closer to being able to hit absolute zero than absolute maximum. God knows what absolute maximum even is haha. I'd imagine absolute maximum would trigger nuclear fission in every atom in its path starting a chain reaction that would wipe the whole planet out long before it died down. Then again what the hell would I know.
BogMonkey53 1 year ago
Max Planck is the genius behind the Quantum paradigm shift with his quantum theory and discovery of quanta, but I still argue that the discovery of Cathode rays by Michael Faraday and the beautiful equations of Maxwell are the foundation of quantum mechanics, or would you say the pre-foundation of quantum mechanics.
Who would you consider the founder of the paradigm shift, and who would you consider the person who most contributed to it?
ogirv101 2 years ago 3
While you're right that Maxwell and Faraday made important contributions to quantum mechanics, I said Planck started it simply because quantum mechanics is literally named after the light quanta that he proposed.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
@UNFFwildcard I agree that Planck is the father of quantum mechanics. There is nothing quantized about cathode rays and Maxwell's electromagnetism.
AlloBruxelles 1 year ago
@ogirv101 Maxwell's equations are the foundation for Special Relativity, the pure classical shit, and I don't understand how you could make connection with quantum shits... Maybe you are just lack of knowledge. Your comment is 2 years old, hope you got smarter
mappingtheshit 3 months ago
Continued @AnonEyeMouse
Why don't you follow your own self-righteous verbiage, and stop responding back. If you respond back, you being a hypocrite, will be confirmed.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
I was working on a presentation on the time line of physics manly about quantum theory
Chill197 2 years ago
What does this have to do with God and Cosmology?
Loustrikesagain 2 years ago
That was very well done UNFF,
that was pretty much the introduction to quantum mechanics I had in my physical chemistry class and you seen to understand it well enough to explain it.
Looking forward to the continuation of the series
buzzausa 2 years ago
Dhorpaten : what does that mean the @xxxxxxxxxxx
help improve my tube etiquette .
alphadog7473 2 years ago
Comment removed
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
I am doing my best to see the connection with quantum physics and God. I am by no way claiming I know, I just do not yet see what duality and particles physics has to do with God. Although I do like the direction this is heading. In search of the GOD particle, what ever that may be it's just a thought .
alphadog7473 2 years ago
Rest assured. Everything in these videos has a future purpose.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
I don't exactly understand how this applies to anything regarding god and religion yet, but I'm sure you will get to it soon enough (assuming I haven't missed something).
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
i learned this in chemistry...
ritban 2 years ago
Chemistry? Really? I would have put it in physics myself...
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
It's both, really.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
All your points and arguments lean towards Deism and a Deist God. Yahweh is not God and his "holy word" is not consistent with the Creation. God's natural laws are all that is needed to govern the universe. God gave us reason, not religion!
Deisthorizon 2 years ago
In order to talk about a theistic god, you must first talk about a deistic god and establish the basics.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
Well said. Great video too btw.
Jestepher 2 years ago
Comment removed
Deisthorizon 2 years ago
Awesone vid UNFF
Great stuff. 5 star and fave
DJ
djarm67 2 years ago
@djarm67
Your made up God doesn't exist. Lacking a primary attribute, it has no identity, and cannot instantiate secondary or relational attributes, as it lacks kinetic actuality, and kinetic potentiality.
Your made up Christian God is disproved.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
While I agree that god does not exist, I think it is wrong to attack someone like djarm67 for his belief. He, along with UNFFwildcard, accept all scientific proof. Their belief in a god is not harmful because they do not try to go against science. Along with people like Ken Miller, these are the people that need to be heard. Religion is not going away, so when they show that you can still accept science and believe in god, it is beneficial. They are not preaching, so what is so bad about it?
mnsportfan28 2 years ago 2
@mnsportfan28
djarm67 has insulted me on a prior video, and has engaged in subjective, Fascist censorship.
Although I don't agree with your self-righteous labeling of my comment as an "attack", djarm67's behavior has been antithetical to Christian tenets.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Which video did he insult you in? I'm subscribed to him and I don't recall it. I'd like to check your claim.
Even if it is true, I'd still advise against such a direct attack in this particular comment section as it seems misplaced and out of context. If you have a debate ongoing with Djarm67 on this topic I'd say keep it to the appropriate comment lists so people can follow it in it's entirity.
One final point, christian tenets are as diverse as christians themselves... ;)
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
A) He insulted me on a Knowntje video, calling me a spammer. Which, not only do I find insulting, but was a lie, since I didn't spam his videos, or channel,and he has no proof of such. Spamming is a subjective insult anyway. Any comment someone finds disagreeable, could be labelled "spam".
B) Your comment about "direct attack", was appallingly self-righteous and exaggerated. if you want to see a verbal attack, I'll give you one. That's not it.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
A) I asked you which video, please be specific. You claim he insulted you - I want to see it. It's a positive claim so I'd like you to provide evidence of it. Not doing so will pretty much invalidate your claim, certainly in my eyes.
B) Your comment was a direct attack because all it did was attack djarm67's personal beliefs. It had nothing to do with the video or the comment posted. Was it vulgar? No. But it was a direct attack because it had no other purpose.
B.2) Yes, I'd love to see it...
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
A) watch?v=40Gj8j-UUbE&feature=channel_page
His insult of me being a spammer is in the comment section
B) My comment was about the Christian God. What does the title of this video say? If it says "God", then my comment was on-topic tangentially.
B.2) By your self-righteous ways, you're clearly not worth lowering oneself to immature barbarity.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Okay I watched the video, which was a debunking of one of yours. Thus you were the topic at hand. I found DJarm67's comment in which he does indeed call you a spammer... He claims you spammed his channel comments several times. Looking through his channel comments back about eight months there are numerous posts by you to him and the vast majority are aggressive and insulting.
Now, that is no comment on the validity or not of the points you raised, merely on the way you raised them...
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
Your aggressive nature coupled with your inability to 'agree to disagree' could well bring you under the umbrella of a spammer. I don't mean that as an insult, merely an observation - as you say yourself, the status of spammer is a subjective one.
I find it odd that you would be so insulted by that word considering the vast amounts of insults you yourself use as a matter of course... In our short exchange you have called me self righteous and declared me beneath your insults...
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
I don't mind really, but it does seem to edge you towards the realm of hypocrite.
I also note that in the video you cite, Knowntje claims to have unblocked you. If this is the case, why not comment there? Why comment here instead on a video with the weakest of links to the topic you raise.
Also, why have that running exchange on DJ's profile comments rather than have it in PMs, which would provide you both with more space to flesh out your arguments and sources?
Yours is curious behaviour.
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
I find it very disturbing you went through
that much effort, to verify Djarms's comment. It suggests you're biased towards him in some way, as in a friend or fan.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
That's an interesting way of looking at things...
I went to all that trouble to verify your claims...
I'm a sub to DJ, but not a fan or a friend except in the loosest sense of 'all folk on my side are my friends'.
I felt I had to follow up your claims to see if you were telling the truth, because that would inform my opinion of any future videos DJ makes.
Context is the key to understanding.
Sorry man, I call more on DJ's side in this than yours.
Thanks for the civil comment, though.
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
"Sorry man, I call more on DJ's side in this than yours.".
^^^I'm shocked. Totally shocked(sarcasm disengaged)
You can side with people who take away the free speech of others on subjective whim and petty disagreement all you want. Judging by what I've seen of you, it surprises me NONE.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
This is what I was talking about when I mentioned your inability to 'agree to disagree'.
I went to the trouble of trying to verify your claim and on reflection, did not think it was warranted.
You could just accept that I don't, nor do I have to, agree with you and move on. You didn't though... and this is the kind of behaviour which, over a couple of weeks, would warrant the term spammer.
You claim DJ took away your free speech? Your comments are still up on his profile for all to see...
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
A) It is starting to become evident that
you are a pretentious hypocrite. I'm not saying that conclusively, but it looks that way. Since you are telling me to agree to disagree, you could do the same and stop replying to me. Not doing so, you are guilty of what you are accusing me of, which is not agreeing to disagree, and let it go.
B) When someone bans you, it doesn't automatically mean they also deleted your comments. What's wrong with you?
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
A) I see we are back to personal attacks.
B) This is the first time you mentioned him banning you. You left a comment one day ago on his page... as far as I know you can't leave comments on profiles of people who've blocked you.
The point about agreeing to disagree would not have been raised if I had not posted.
But, in that mode, I agree to disagree with your claim that DJ insulted you and that you are not a spammer.
lets move on.
Take care, hope you have a good day.
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
"This is the first time you mentioned him banning you"
^^^Well, looking at the comment archives, it proves you're wrong, since I mentioned it to mnsportfan28.
"as far as I know you can't leave comments on profiles of people who've blocked you"
^^^As far as I know, you can be unblocked,
after getting blocked.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
'djarm67 has insulted me on a prior video, and has engaged in subjective, Fascist censorship.'
You mean this? Point to the part in that sentence that says DJ banned you...
'^^^As far as I know, you can be unblocked,
after getting blocked. '
Unblocking some one is the act of a 'fascist censor'?
Really?
REALLY?
I notice you rejected my suggestion to move on... seems it doesn't matter if I want to agree to disagree or not... you are still going to spam my comments.
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
"You mean this? Point to the part in that sentence that says DJ banned you"
^^^That's what I meant by Fascist censorship. His unjustified and subjective block.
"Unblocking some one is the act of a 'fascist censor'?"
^^^The initial blocking was.
"I notice you rejected my suggestion to move on"
^^^I notice you continued to lend credence to the notion that you are a pretentious hypocrite.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
"That's what I meant by Fascist censorship"
Considering the pendantic nature of so many of your comments, you don't get to be this fuzzy with your words... That would be hypocracy.
You say your blocking was unjustified. I disagree, from the evidence. Blocking has its place for getting rid of trolls and those who just throw insults.
Your continual insults are grounds enough to ban you from a channel.
One wonders why you feel the need to present such an aggressive persona.
Compensating?
AnonEyeMouse 2 years ago
@AnonEyeMouse
Well, let's see. You have insinuated insults to me, that I'm a troll, a spammer,
insulting, and aggressive. So that's hypocritical on your part. You keep talking about agreeing to disagree, and moving on, but you refuse to move on, and seem insistent on getting in the last word. So you're being a hypocrite there.
Continued....
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
rofl
Ah good one dor
djarm67 2 years ago
@djarm67
What's a "dor"?
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Bravo! Encore.
bamboo4tameshigiri 2 years ago
Thanks for the series. It's nice to see a believer in god not resort to lies and distortions.
I am curious, however, what part a god does play in the universe. If, as you've mentioned, the big bang, abiogenesis, and evolution is true, it would appear that the universe is capable of managing itself without a god figure. So where does your idea of god come into play?
Again, thanks for this series. I've subscribed. :)
Hikerpunk 2 years ago
"where does your idea of god come into play?"
I can't speak for UNFFwildcard, but many Christians believe that god guided these processes.
IceFire9yt 2 years ago
you are doing what DonExodus would never do when he was a Christian--make a simple video on God!!!
amazing
TheIrrationalAtheist 2 years ago 2
Is don an atheist now?
scotsocool 2 years ago
No, he's an "agnostic"--err, because he couldn't answer this question--not even kidding.
"why jesus over zeus"
Which he answered in his "Why I believe in God" series. Me and Kabane basically ripped him a new one--in love of course :P
TheIrrationalAtheist 2 years ago
Don also didn't seem very adept at history.
chert95 2 years ago
He wasn't interested in his faith, seemed like, I am no one to judge. But we must be active in God, and I think that's what happened.
TheIrrationalAtheist 2 years ago
It was only a matter of time for Don to deconvert.
Knowntje 2 years ago
@Knowntje
I am starting to suspect you secretly have Christian leanings, and God believing tendencies.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
@knowntje
nah I'm thinking more about scientology, I love science fiction
but yeah I regulary ejaculate on a crucifix, does that count?
Knowntje 2 years ago
@Knowntje
"but yeah I regulary ejaculate on a crucifix, does that count?"
^^^With sickening and profane comments like this, I should be wondering why YOU have as many subscribers as you do.
As usual, you never let me down in your disgusting ways Knowntje.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
I aim to please
Knowntje 2 years ago
the DonExodus2 channel is a science channel. He is a biologist.
He said he bases his faith on the New Testament and personal experiences. How do you know he's not active in his faith?
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
Someone mentioned on Agnosticman's channel that DonExodus recently claimed to be an agnostic on one of his videos in the comment section. That blew me away. Don't know if it's true though.
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
@HonestDiscussioner
Don't know if it's true though.
^^^It's true.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
He did say this, I read it and was floored by the comment. I guess the lure of the dark side is irresistable.....lol.
jdf088 2 years ago
If the lure of the dark side was irresistable he'd have become a Creationist.
Let's remember who the dark side really is here :-).
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
Great Sunday morning video.
PFTECHMETAL 2 years ago
Well done, keep em coming mate!
DarkTheAtheist 2 years ago
Another good video.
5 *'d and fav'd
dprjones 2 years ago