Can you please do more examples that are relatively more complex. I appreciate all the work you have done and indeed I am very grateful. I'm sure the 93,000 people who have watched this will feel the same way :)
Patrick, I can't thank you enough!!! English is not my mother language, but I can perfectly understand you. You helped me pass Calc I,,II,,III,,,,,,I never bought the book because x reasons but thanks to you I'm on my way.....NOW differential of equations, Thank you!!! I've told friends about you videos, and definitively will get you some donations when I graduate :)...YOU ROCK!!!
anybody could please tell me where i can find tables of integrals? my friend has this huge list with a bunch of integrals they're probably about 400 or maybe almost 500. and he won't pass me a copy. :(
Integrate (x^3 + 3xy^2)dx, which gives you x^4/4 + 3/2x^2y^2 + g(y), and then differentiate it with respect to y. This should give you
3x^2y + g'(y). That equation is a partial fraction with respect to y, just as the (3x^2 y + y^3)dy is; because of that you know that g'(y) is = to y^3, which means g(y) = y^4/4.
Substitute g(y) in to your x^4/4 + 3/2x^2y^2 + g(y), and you end up with
Hey you're the best, maybe one day you can have a website or video! You are really great at breaking things down! Only thing is I wish I would have discover these videos earlier during my differential equations class, I'll probably be kicking butt right now lol
What I usually do is watch a Khan lecture to get a good grasp on the "intuition" and then watch a Patrick video to solidify the process. Clear audio and great organization make your videos the cream of the internet crop.
I know you're focusing on teaching the method, not practicing, but I think it would be helpful if maybe you showed a few different types of problems. I understood this video perfectly, and was excited, thinking I had this under control. But I was not able to solve the simple equation (2x-y)dx+(2y-x)dy=0 using this method; I wound up with h'(y)=2y-x^2, and now since h(y) depends on x instead of just y alone, I am lost with what to do.
Just sent you a small donation. i'm a broke college kid but i hope you continue with what you are doing and maybe one day i will be able to help out people too just like you
What I really like about these videos is that the technique is shown really well. When I ever I am learning something new I always place emphasise on the technique and its done really well here.
It amazes me how you are able to write with your left hand on a dry erase board. I always struggle with that, even the old chalk boards gave me trouble.
That is why i hated to get called before the class and write something on the board. <.<
i know this doesnt really matter but where you see y prime i think you should of explained how that relates to the first order diffferential equations general form just saying even though it doesnt change the answer or solution
Since they're not equal you have to use an integrating factor. Khan Academy has a couple good videos on how to solve using an integrating factor. Another place you can look is sosmath(dot)com. Go to the differentiable equations section and read the section 'Integrating Factor Technique'.
Excellent once again, Mr. Patrick. Could you possibly make a video showing the process for using an integrating factor to "make" functions exact when M'(y) does not equal N'(x) in the original function? It's confusing the heck out of me, and I know you'd be able to explain it simpler than my prof....
@brco2003 he is doing great stuff and deserves every penny. i was only joking (although some have taken the comment a bit more seriously for whatever reason!)
@patrickJMT I was going through Khan's tutorial for exact equation. But after I found your's, it really helped me where I got stuck with Khan's. You are really gr8. you also deserve every penny because you are damn good in what you do.
@patrickJMT I wish Khan Academy would expand out more and bring in a few more tutors, including you, for video leactures. You're on par with Sal and your videos are easier to read (no mspaint!).
@321boileranimal MIT lectures and classes are difficult for nearly everyone, even the students who go there, partly due to the fact that they also develop intuition and not just how to do something. Patrick teaches you how to identify and solve these equations and sort of develops algebra and calculus skills through his many many examples, but goes over it so briefly that it best serves as a review before an exam and a tool to clear common confusion.
@mariomaruf With my Calc book, I felt that going to class, mostly in Calculus two; was a waste of time. because its so much easier to read the theorems do the problems, then ask questions later for 20 mins. and move on. However in my Diff EQ book, the examples and theorems are not written as fluently, or articulately , the therms are much harder to follow rather then being broken down like in the Algebra books and Calc books. Where there are many colorful examples.
@321boileranimal Is your book published by Dover? Those books are pretty hardcore compared to high school books, and while you could definitely learn Algebra and Calculus in a month with the books used in high school, 2nd year level math is a more full level of math which is usually taught in a completely "Theory --> Problem --> Repeat" sort of way that translates directly to most popular books including the cheap Dover line. I guess Patrick does well to get rid of that overly general fluff.
@321boileranimal He could easily be more intuitive but many people don't like that approach very much because the whys and theories behind things clutter understanding and can easily heighten one's confusion. I get really confused by those lectures too but the reason I understand them is because I use some additional supplements like a book or Patrick's videos, just to narrow down the absolutely necessary information or to set up the frame before I put in the picture..
It doesn't look like your video has been praised in over a month so I believe it is once again over due... If you do not already have a lucrative teaching job you should...
Can you explain why when you do the partial derivative of M and N you take the derivative with respect to X on the M equation and the derivative with respect to Y to the N equation. I don't see this algebraically. It makes sense to me when the equation were written as (M)dx + (N)dy) = 0 but here it's (M)+(N) Y' = 0 and I don't see how you get there algebraically. Thanks.
I have recommended you many times to my friends, I guess why professors aren't called teachers is because they cant teach! You are a saint in the world of mathematics, possibly a god.
if our derivative of the arbitrary constant is found to be equal to zero does that mean our constant is simply c and that our f(x,y) is therefore just the integral without the h(y) equal to a constant?
I have the exact same problem as an example in my book, but patrickJMT just explains it WAY more efficiently and is a lot easier to understand. THANKS!!!
They're partial derivatives. That means that you take the derivative with respect to a chosen variable while treating the other variable as a constant.
this is the by the book way. when you find out they're exact, you'll see that you can actually integrate them and piece them together straight down without all that variable crap. that gets confusing.
I understand the steps that were taken, but why is the final answer equal to C? I don't see how the final answer would be a solution to the initial problem.
because f(x,y)=K, where K is iqual to any Constant and thats why is a "C". in other words, thats by definition and in your exams try to put it like that because even though you have solved it properly, but if you dont put it like F(x, y)=C or K, its a bad answers.
Hi I found this video usefull but you need to improve the naming of your functions! if you think about what you are doing you are calling two distinct functions both f(x).
Can you please do more examples that are relatively more complex. I appreciate all the work you have done and indeed I am very grateful. I'm sure the 93,000 people who have watched this will feel the same way :)
zoom2121 6 days ago
Everybody, when you graduate and have an awesome job, remember how much patrickJMT helped you through university and donate! ...or just do it now.
MissChelsie24 1 week ago
Excellent, great vid!
BobblerBarnOwl 1 week ago
Patrick, I can't thank you enough!!! English is not my mother language, but I can perfectly understand you. You helped me pass Calc I,,II,,III,,,,,,I never bought the book because x reasons but thanks to you I'm on my way.....NOW differential of equations, Thank you!!! I've told friends about you videos, and definitively will get you some donations when I graduate :)...YOU ROCK!!!
phanelius 3 weeks ago
@phanelius happy i could help : ) thanks for telling your friends, it is appreciated!
patrickJMT 2 weeks ago
thanks sir , this is exactly the same example that my teacher solved in the class.. i couldnt ask more from you
malibu90 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
BrianEngineering2014 1 month ago
anybody could please tell me where i can find tables of integrals? my friend has this huge list with a bunch of integrals they're probably about 400 or maybe almost 500. and he won't pass me a copy. :(
martmelee 1 month ago
@martmelee any calculus book has them, usually at the end. you could probably just google it as well
patrickJMT 1 month ago
Plz can u solve more examples for Exact D.E..!!
(x^3 + 3xy^2)dx + (3x^2 y + y^3)dy = 0
plz solv this question 4 me... sir plz plz
dkdonster 1 month ago
@dkdonster
Integrate (x^3 + 3xy^2)dx, which gives you x^4/4 + 3/2x^2y^2 + g(y), and then differentiate it with respect to y. This should give you
3x^2y + g'(y). That equation is a partial fraction with respect to y, just as the (3x^2 y + y^3)dy is; because of that you know that g'(y) is = to y^3, which means g(y) = y^4/4.
Substitute g(y) in to your x^4/4 + 3/2x^2y^2 + g(y), and you end up with
x^4/4 + 3/2x^2y^2 + y^4/4 = C
as your final answer.
Is that right Patrick xD
McChickenn 1 month ago
h(y) means x??
dkdonster 1 month ago
Is exact the same thing as being conservative, or is that only for vector functions?
roflcopter2225 1 month ago
Patric this equation is for u
(sqrt(cos(x))*cos(200 x)+sqrt(abs(x))-0.7)*(4-x*x)^0.01, sqrt(9-x^2), -sqrt(9-x^2) from -4.5 to 4.5
copy paste it in google search...
dkdonster 1 month ago
@dkdonster ahahahhhaha awesome : )
patrickJMT 1 month ago
Do you have a video about not exact?? thnx =)
halflife1994 2 months ago
i like it
ur lvl of ques is higher than a average youtube uploader
keep it up and do some very hairy problems if u feel like doing
007abhinavagarwal 2 months ago
Hey you're the best, maybe one day you can have a website or video! You are really great at breaking things down! Only thing is I wish I would have discover these videos earlier during my differential equations class, I'll probably be kicking butt right now lol
jayjay71270 2 months ago
c going out with minece mate
bigaaal3marzooq 2 months ago
that is TOO MUCH integrating and differentiating. Lol, like seriously TOO MUCH. Back and Forth Back and Forth....
Anyway, appreciated !!! I watch your video before i study from the book to get an idea of the thing first
Thanks :)
pimpmymail 3 months ago
why we put solution equal to c at the end?
crossxinfinity 3 months ago
if there was a constant in fx(x,y) and you integrate it would it become x or y?
PianoManX2 3 months ago
Dude... you explain in 5 minutes what my proffessor can't in a semester, I swear...
hyperice98520 3 months ago
What I usually do is watch a Khan lecture to get a good grasp on the "intuition" and then watch a Patrick video to solidify the process. Clear audio and great organization make your videos the cream of the internet crop.
conglacious 3 months ago
probably just saved my diff eq grade!!!!
sharada10 3 months ago
I know you're focusing on teaching the method, not practicing, but I think it would be helpful if maybe you showed a few different types of problems. I understood this video perfectly, and was excited, thinking I had this under control. But I was not able to solve the simple equation (2x-y)dx+(2y-x)dy=0 using this method; I wound up with h'(y)=2y-x^2, and now since h(y) depends on x instead of just y alone, I am lost with what to do.
Still, great video, thanks! :D
ToyMachine22122 4 months ago
Great explanation, could you also show some that are not so pretty? Like one that isn't already set up?
jnolan2008 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
too fast .....
and please use printOut ,computer writing to made it more effective ..
saudisprince 4 months ago
@saudisprince no thanks
patrickJMT 4 months ago 19
Really Great explanation. Thanks so much!
risalvat 4 months ago
he is better than Servatius
godiegogo1991 4 months ago
@godiegogo1991 anything is better than servatius
wpi2992 4 months ago
Nice 1
LoveRockMe85 4 months ago
Holy shit, why aren't you a Nobel Peace Prize winner?
BoredAlways 4 months ago
Thanks much. This beats trying to understand it from the textbook by a long shot! (I hate math textbooks this is so much easier to understand)
XBLAQPHYREX 4 months ago
Just sent you a small donation. i'm a broke college kid but i hope you continue with what you are doing and maybe one day i will be able to help out people too just like you
kazmanX 4 months ago 9
@kazmanX super duper appreciated. if i got $.05 per view, i would be a super happy guy : )
patrickJMT 4 months ago 2
@patrickJMT
and a millionaire
JaktheAtheist 4 months ago
@JaktheAtheist this is true!
patrickJMT 4 months ago
What I really like about these videos is that the technique is shown really well. When I ever I am learning something new I always place emphasise on the technique and its done really well here.
southpawking1 5 months ago
nice video, I think you should give an example where My =/ Nx to highlight what happens if the conditions are not met
Cammie010 5 months ago
@Cammie010 THATS A HUGE BITCH!!!
Karestasse 5 months ago
Who in the world dislike this video? It CAN"T BE ANY CLEARER!!!
Pianoblacks 5 months ago
thank you so much sir!
MrPve123 5 months ago
Thanks so much man, you are a true pimp!
MakenX5 6 months ago
It amazes me how you are able to write with your left hand on a dry erase board. I always struggle with that, even the old chalk boards gave me trouble.
That is why i hated to get called before the class and write something on the board. <.<
plastefuchs666 6 months ago
super like :) it was really helpful :) \o/
sundaricoolgirl 7 months ago
I want to solve (e^(3x)sin(3y)+(1/(x^2-4x-5)))dx + (e^(3x)cos(3y)+e^(4y))dy = 0
Is there a way to check my work? Wolfram Alpha times out and I'm not sure how to use the TI-89 to check.
I got (e^(3x)sin(3y))/3 - (ln[(x+1)/(x-5)])/6 + (e^(4y))/4 = C
I found My and Nx. They are equal, which means it is an exact equation. Then I simply followed the process.
fingerboy18 7 months ago
u should try to get an endorsement from the markers or whiteboard company. that would b beast
doctorsanch 7 months ago
Good video....... this is the first time Im coming accross this type of differential equation and you just explained it amazingly... cheers
TheGarr123 8 months ago
great men!!!, you was a lot help for me..
greetings from colombia
carloznds1988 9 months ago
I was doing this along with you and just realised, not only are the videos amazing, We use the same markers.
hyracatherium 9 months ago
amazing ,thank you a lot
92310CAMILLE 9 months ago
In my book there is a dx after the M and a dy after the N.. you have y' notation. its just a little bit confusing.
tucense 10 months ago
Thank you so much
greetings from Cairo - Egypt ;)
ziadarwady 10 months ago
i know this doesnt really matter but where you see y prime i think you should of explained how that relates to the first order diffferential equations general form just saying even though it doesnt change the answer or solution
gopio9 10 months ago
thank you you are amazing
Blitzcrag18 10 months ago
Thank you so much for your help Patrick, because of you I am going to pass differential equations
Take care yourself and keep posting videos you are awesome dude¡¡¡
MKL131366 11 months ago
love ur handwriting...neat and small so u can fit in lots of stuff on a page unlike mine...gr8 job!
pohdohloh 11 months ago
u rock.... :P i passed my calculus paper evn still m learning frm ur vids :P ... best teacher ...*thumbs up*
000jawad 11 months ago
how would you differentiate: y' = 5t - 3(y^.5) y(0)=2 i cant seem to figure out what to do with the radical y
CGRLW 11 months ago
@CGRLW
Bring them over to the left side:
(3*y^.5 - 5t) + y' = 0
M = (3*y^.5 - 5t); N = 1
My = (3/2)*y^(-1/2) ; Nx = 0
Since they're not equal you have to use an integrating factor. Khan Academy has a couple good videos on how to solve using an integrating factor. Another place you can look is sosmath(dot)com. Go to the differentiable equations section and read the section 'Integrating Factor Technique'.
twirmd 11 months ago
@twirmd thanks alot, what about an ode where both M w.r.t. y and N w.r.t x are both 0? does it mean they are exact or they arent allow to equal zero?
CGRLW 11 months ago
@CGRLW Sorry for the really late reply. I didn't see your question in my inbox until just now. If M.y and N.x are both zero then they're still exact.
twirmd 8 months ago
im just noticing I've seen hours of this guy's videos and all i know about what he looks like is the back of his left hand...
Zadamanim 11 months ago 6
@Zadamanim that is just how i want it.
i tutored two girls for about a year before they realized they had been watching my videos. : )
one day, one of the girls was like: you sound just like this guy on the internet whose videos i watch. you even have the same name...
patrickJMT 11 months ago 48
@patrickJMT so you're not the guy in the background image of your channel?
TeshiKennedy117 8 months ago
@patrickJMT
Did you fuck said girls?
lazarpandar 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zadamanim check his site :)
youniabdul 8 months ago
Excellent once again, Mr. Patrick. Could you possibly make a video showing the process for using an integrating factor to "make" functions exact when M'(y) does not equal N'(x) in the original function? It's confusing the heck out of me, and I know you'd be able to explain it simpler than my prof....
mkinsel19 11 months ago
Khan Academy did this exact same example, but this was much neater.
brco2003 1 year ago
@brco2003 where is my $2,000,000 grant ? : )
patrickJMT 11 months ago 18
@patrickJMT LOL. Pat, you have heart and soul and that's all that matters. (Also, Khan has a large and diverse library and an educational vision.)
brco2003 11 months ago
@brco2003 he is doing great stuff and deserves every penny. i was only joking (although some have taken the comment a bit more seriously for whatever reason!)
patrickJMT 9 months ago 2
@patrickJMT I was going through Khan's tutorial for exact equation. But after I found your's, it really helped me where I got stuck with Khan's. You are really gr8. you also deserve every penny because you are damn good in what you do.
rajneeshdewan 6 months ago
@patrickJMT I wish Khan Academy would expand out more and bring in a few more tutors, including you, for video leactures. You're on par with Sal and your videos are easier to read (no mspaint!).
twirmd 11 months ago 2
what does the (x,y) mean?
ironicRON 1 year ago
Your video kicks the Instructor from MIT in his Pussy.
321boileranimal 1 year ago 42
@321boileranimal karate *KICK*
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@321boileranimal MIT lectures and classes are difficult for nearly everyone, even the students who go there, partly due to the fact that they also develop intuition and not just how to do something. Patrick teaches you how to identify and solve these equations and sort of develops algebra and calculus skills through his many many examples, but goes over it so briefly that it best serves as a review before an exam and a tool to clear common confusion.
mariomaruf 10 months ago
@mariomaruf With my Calc book, I felt that going to class, mostly in Calculus two; was a waste of time. because its so much easier to read the theorems do the problems, then ask questions later for 20 mins. and move on. However in my Diff EQ book, the examples and theorems are not written as fluently, or articulately , the therms are much harder to follow rather then being broken down like in the Algebra books and Calc books. Where there are many colorful examples.
Cheers!
321boileranimal 10 months ago
@321boileranimal Is your book published by Dover? Those books are pretty hardcore compared to high school books, and while you could definitely learn Algebra and Calculus in a month with the books used in high school, 2nd year level math is a more full level of math which is usually taught in a completely "Theory --> Problem --> Repeat" sort of way that translates directly to most popular books including the cheap Dover line. I guess Patrick does well to get rid of that overly general fluff.
mariomaruf 10 months ago
@321boileranimal He could easily be more intuitive but many people don't like that approach very much because the whys and theories behind things clutter understanding and can easily heighten one's confusion. I get really confused by those lectures too but the reason I understand them is because I use some additional supplements like a book or Patrick's videos, just to narrow down the absolutely necessary information or to set up the frame before I put in the picture..
mariomaruf 10 months ago
@321boileranimal
Same with my calc teacher at UPenn
ohhitsloveee 9 months ago
even though its hard , but you made it so easy !!
to HELL with my teacher!!
sbsaad 1 year ago
@sbsaad well, that may be a bit harsh : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
why does it seem so complicated in the class notes and textbooks :(
yyourfacee 1 year ago
@yyourfacee because they're getting paid
Zadamanim 11 months ago
@yyourfacee because they're getting paid regardless of if you learn it or not
Zadamanim 11 months ago
It doesn't look like your video has been praised in over a month so I believe it is once again over due... If you do not already have a lucrative teaching job you should...
Very well done sir
mclawson232 1 year ago
THANK YOU!!!
n0pr7 1 year ago
your steps are simple and clear, thanks a lot
marquelmah 1 year ago
Your teaching is clear and awesome. I learnt from you more than all my maths lecturer. Thank you so much!!!
Chris910817 1 year ago
Just five minutes to completely explain a thing that I've been struggling to understand from my lecture notes for the past 20 minutes.
Great thanks!
walcXP 1 year ago
You speak another language than me and you're clearer than my teachers. Thank you so much for the vids.
garnacov 1 year ago 4
@garnacov ha, happy to help : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
amazing~you save me!!!
wo0725 1 year ago
dude, you got what i need
sweatpants1212 1 year ago
did you miss the x' for the ycos(x) + 2xe^y . Should the question be (ycos(x)+sxe^y) x' ....ect
Bmsscott 1 year ago
Brilliant.
linkinwayne 1 year ago
undoubtedly the best teacher ever.
maksingh10 1 year ago
feels like I just came out of an hour of Diff EQ class, except I know what you were saying XD. This should make homework much easier.
jakbruce2008 1 year ago
Oh my god. Thank you.
from this one vid i've seen, you already make up for me not having the textbook and a lousy Prof
MistryWho 1 year ago
Patrick = Chuck Norris !
farshadguitar 1 year ago
Thank you so much. I can't believe a 6 minute youtube video cleared up confusion from an hour class and 2 hours of reading the textbook.
aaaraura 1 year ago
Dude, thank you sooo much. I spent five hours trying to figure out what to do after finding out that the equation is exact. Great presentation.
Crunchysann 1 year ago
Can you explain why when you do the partial derivative of M and N you take the derivative with respect to X on the M equation and the derivative with respect to Y to the N equation. I don't see this algebraically. It makes sense to me when the equation were written as (M)dx + (N)dy) = 0 but here it's (M)+(N) Y' = 0 and I don't see how you get there algebraically. Thanks.
nicholaschase29 1 year ago
@nicholaschase29 (M)+(N) Y' = (M)+(Y) dx/dy yes? Then multiplying by dy gives you (M) dy + (N) dx
MrRendellious 1 year ago
I have recommended you many times to my friends, I guess why professors aren't called teachers is because they cant teach! You are a saint in the world of mathematics, possibly a god.
wshark931 1 year ago
@wshark931 glad u think enough of the vids to recommend them to others : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
THANK YOU!!
bunny188 1 year ago
Thank you
Electrickl 1 year ago
if our derivative of the arbitrary constant is found to be equal to zero does that mean our constant is simply c and that our f(x,y) is therefore just the integral without the h(y) equal to a constant?
uchihaitachi33023 1 year ago
I spent half a day trying to understand this on my own.
God bless u.
tosyn33 1 year ago 3
@tosyn33 glad the vid helped : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT Dude your awesome at teaching, just wondering what qualifications do you have and what grades did you get in maths ? thanks
cobster123 1 year ago
you are the best sir. thank you so much ;)
djdoom99 1 year ago
it is very helpfull........
2821sunny 1 year ago
hi,
I first of all thank you for ur great help .
I have a question and i need its solution plz help me , the question is
y=(1+p)x +p^2 ; where p=y'
Thanks alot
styleguru1986 1 year ago
@styleguru1986 Do your own homework.
calculus89 1 year ago
Thanks a lot! That was fantastic
ravi2253 1 year ago
spent an hr reading a text book and cud not understand ...........looked at your video twice and i got it...YAY!!!!!!!!!!11
ar81rome 1 year ago
I have the exact same problem as an example in my book, but patrickJMT just explains it WAY more efficiently and is a lot easier to understand. THANKS!!!
tonyw1988 1 year ago
bad volume voice
BoobsVsBoobs 1 year ago
I love you.
SuBliMe420zzz 1 year ago
i have 1 question :
patrick why while u do derivative u did not use product role . i mean N , M
AreThereSexy 1 year ago
@AreThereSexy
They're partial derivatives. That means that you take the derivative with respect to a chosen variable while treating the other variable as a constant.
dramajoe 1 year ago
i think the equation is like that
h ̀(y)=-1
h(y)=-y+c
f(x,y)=y sinx+x^2 e^y-y+c
loly717 1 year ago
@loly717
Just set that equation equal to zero and move the c over, you'll get the same equation as him. :)
Gleeful90 1 year ago
where is non exact examples my teacher?
khalid97899789 1 year ago
this is the by the book way. when you find out they're exact, you'll see that you can actually integrate them and piece them together straight down without all that variable crap. that gets confusing.
JVinci16 1 year ago
thx man, trying to read that out of the book was a pain in the ass
cfl941 1 year ago
amazing
tennisIS4pussys 1 year ago
at 3:18 isnt its supposed to be -ysinx cuz the derivative of cos is -sin
comaster07 2 years ago
On this step he is integrating the function, not derivating.
IanFarias00 2 years ago
he didn't take a derivative he integrated.
scott01019 2 years ago
no he was integrating there
anti derivative of cos x is sin x
genomstic 1 year ago
@comaster07 he is integrating with respect to x so its positive sin.
555DarkLord555 1 year ago
what if it's not exact. is there anyway you could make it exact?
lifematch 2 years ago
sometimes you can with an integrating factor-
theonlyrealshark 2 years ago
Watch Khan Academy videos, most precisely the "Integrating Factors" ones. It tells you to multiply the whole first equation by an especific function.
IanFarias00 2 years ago
you could possibly mess around with trig identities if its sin and cos
genomstic 1 year ago
@lifematch yes, I cannot remember how to right now, but in some instances you can make it exact
tennisIS4pussys 1 year ago
you find the integrating factor
jomomaisamofo 1 year ago
would of know about these i would of never of dropped cal 2. well... maybe i would have anyway, who wants to learn cal 2 at 7 am. hehe
MrMasonMMA 2 years ago
Are you using the textbook by Boyce?
brco2003 2 years ago
Great Video man! It helped me out alot!!
me2kool4u 2 years ago
i "glazed"
lickachair4fun 2 years ago
No fan fare or fluff, precise, to the point, very clear in the presentation. In short, an excellent piece of work.
Thanks for posting this and I'll be checking out the rest of your videos and website as well.
Five Stars.
cochisewolf 2 years ago 20
You're a legend for posting all of these videos up!
musesparrow 2 years ago
Thanks for this JMT.
3lGranGon 2 years ago
fellow left hander! haha.
PostalTubeAlex 2 years ago 2
THANKS
97360401 2 years ago
What is the backwards "E" symbol in the start?
axelasdf 2 years ago
it means 'there exists'
jishuenkam 2 years ago
YOU SAVED MY LIFE!
electricsashimi 2 years ago
I understand the steps that were taken, but why is the final answer equal to C? I don't see how the final answer would be a solution to the initial problem.
jamesqwerty87 2 years ago
because f(x,y)=K, where K is iqual to any Constant and thats why is a "C". in other words, thats by definition and in your exams try to put it like that because even though you have solved it properly, but if you dont put it like F(x, y)=C or K, its a bad answers.
my opinion: its just an extra step. but do it.
ikarusbodom 2 years ago
can you make a video on how to find gradient of curves?
GMFroggy 2 years ago
Hi I found this video usefull but you need to improve the naming of your functions! if you think about what you are doing you are calling two distinct functions both f(x).
kipman725 2 years ago
So.... what if it's not exact?
Foaman 2 years ago 2
use another method
SquarangularPrism 2 years ago
If it isn't exact you should try to find an integrating factor that makes it work...but I'm not sure how to do that lol
daverandomster 2 years ago
If not exact, u may use the method of Seperation or use integration factor.
cwxzeng 2 years ago
please i need ur email
faheemafr 2 years ago
great, i missed class today and have a quiz tomorrow, you just saved my life for this section! hooray!
abarrien00 2 years ago 2
awesome
assblood1 2 years ago 5
Thanks Patrick! Finally, I understand and can solve exact differntial equations!
adhikarisubash 2 years ago 3
Forgive me but, are you missing a dx in the first function?
eznamee 2 years ago 2
u mean dx or x' on (ycosx+2xe^y) ?
DRCE777 2 years ago
My and Nx are equal to 0 is the equations still exact?
1950slollipop 2 years ago
bodoh....
bigheadbang 2 years ago
left handed people can either mean they're smart OR goodlooking. either one of both. la la la
bigheadbang 2 years ago
i dont think i am either... so too bad for me
patrickJMT 2 years ago
i bet you are both though
patrickJMT 2 years ago
thanks..
crownhellfire 2 years ago
Comment removed
aureusalioqui 2 years ago 2
yup
dunesandcoons 2 years ago
Comment removed
aureusalioqui 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your saving my ass, my prof likes to speak chinese, i dont speak chinese
stihl29 3 years ago
Comment removed
stihl29 3 years ago