BTW I believe Lincoln did NOT call up a force to invade Virginia, as Virginia was still part of the Union. Lincoln called for Virginia to invade South Carolina, 70,000 troops, when called to do so they refused and seceded as they then realized that the Union is overstepping beyond return.
This kind of blatant lying and misleading in the media really makes me angry. They will get away with it though, because what little education people are given in school is in line with what they say in the media. Unless a person goes out and does some research for themselves, they'll never KNOW that sharpton and schultz were fabricating the majority of what they said. Education is the biggest problem that I can see here. The Public School system has failed us and our children.
Al Sharpton @8:25 "Can you imagine anywhere in the world, that people would sit around a celebrate people that declared war and actually killed people, against their country?"
Um.... Yes Al, actually I can. We all do it... Every 4th of July. Classic hypocritical stuff..
@PSTripler Before the 7 years war control of the colonies was local the shift towards more and more centralized control to pay for the war is what caused the secession. Englishmen were trying to financially enslave other Englishmen.
@PSTripler There were two cultures. The northern states made up the majority of congress. Jefferson and all the founding fathers supported secession. They did it. Any state can leave at any time. We are all free if a group of us want a new government it is our right. If the people in power want to look at it as treason let them. The British look at American Secession as treason.
@PSTripler No it would make us pro American. We won the American Revolution to ensure control of our land remained in our hands. The war for Southern Independence was no different. The South was fighting so it's people could be free. So they could live under a Constitutional Government that represented them not one controlled by a Northern Majority. That is America. We are rebels. We believe in the people not the ones in power. Mel Gibson wasn't fighting the colonists.
@festdir Who was fighting for slavery? You have completely bought the Yankee myth of the war. Secession was in part motivated by the slavery question, though there are other major issues such as the tariff (the South was paying 80% of the Federal budget and most of the 4 was being spent on Northern project). But the people of the South (over 90% of whom owned no slaves) didn't fight so rich men could keep their slaves. They fought to protect their families and homes from an invasion.
Let's ask the VP of the CSA..."Our new govt is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition."
Lets ask South Carolina "election of a man to the high office of President of the US whose opinions and purposes are hostile to Slavery."
@festdir Now you have changed the subject. You're now talking about the opinions of the VP of the CSA gov't, not the reason people fought in the war. Stevens, like most White people in both the North and South did not believe in racial equality. But this has nothing to do with why people actually picked up guns and resisted the invasion of the Federal military. The average person had no slaves and fought because the South was invaded.
@SPQRomantic Good way of stating it. Yes they seceded over slavery to a point, but keep in mind even Lincoln promised a constitutional amendment to guarantee the right to own slaves! Only in return to stay in the union. so clearly it was beyond that issue. Then move on to the fact that Lincoln wanted to rid America to be deported to colonize Liberia...
I'm from Lyman South Carolina, u aware where thats at?
I live in Shelby North Carolina ATM.
I hate to say it man, but the carolinas will be overflooded with yankees if somthing doesn't happen.. Georgia/Florida/NorthCarolina/and SouthCarolina have rapid amounts of northerners moving here... South Carolina joined the list of fastest growing states in 2010..
If this keeps up, you will literally have no chance of secession with the majority of people living here aren't even natives.
@Hellzyeah1990 Well, it will be increasingly difficult the more time goes by. I'm not going to lie to you. Of course, I'm in contact and even friends with some Northerners who support secession and moved down here to get active for that purpose. I hope that as the dollar collapses and DC becomes more and more tyrannical that people will decide to break with the Feds. It may come down to a de facto secession even within the state - I just don't know. But I don't think it's good to lose all hope.
@PSTripler The states are America if the North seceded do you believe that would make them anti-american? If the southern democrats had won the presidency some of the northern republican states would have most likely left.
@m3i0wnu I'm not going to try and make any point or talk you or anyone else into understanding any point, quite frankly I could careless if you like it or not, I could careless what your opinion is or your thoughts on the subject.
1. Your friend in the hat called the protest 'fake'. What did he mean?
2. You remarked in the video, that since the protesters left it was "alot safer to be here". Did you feel threatened by the protest? If so, why? If not, why make the remarks?
3. Do you think other people might feel threatened at your own protests? Do you think it is safer for other people in the area, when your group finishes a protest and leaves?
On the video 'Secession Gala & NAACP Protest Against Southern Heritage' I posted 4 questions, under another account. You deleted the questions, and blocked the account. The questions were not abusive, aggressive or offensive.
They were reasonable, and delivered reasonably. They were honest inquiries.
Do you only allow comments you agree with on your videos?
I will repost the questions, with one more added, so viewers can answer them, or judge if they should have been blocked.
@PSTripler so you do not agree with his funding and isp service being cut off as soon as some juicy dirt on obama came out , right? or do you thin k he should expose obama's hypocrisy? you do know he has dirt on obama , dont you??
@PSTripler so you think the site should not be taken down even if it puts american lives in danger, if by nothing other that the justification jihadists will get to kill more americans? the soldier who leaked the classified info should be killed, the wikileaks asshole should be imprisoned for ignoriging the classified assignment of those documents. everyone knows what classified means and that there are consequences for not following the guidlines for an aussie rapist or anyone else
Post invasion they claim our government surrendered but we never did, they force economic poverty upon us and exploit the effects, inferring ignorance and stupidity and all this concealed in mis-truth and taught to our own children in schools our own tax's pay for, restricted from prayer but practiced in oath all meant to perpetuate in order to suppress.
Yankees have been suppressing the South ever since before the invasion of 1861, the South represented Christianity, Human Decencies, Pride and Strong Family values the south was where the Arts thrived our cotton industry created growth for the entire nation's economy in the antebellum we represented everything the North strive to be but never could achieved.
@WestTexasRebel Unfortunately, representing Christiantiy wouldn't be defined as a good thing by all people, mostly due to ridiculous bigotry on the part of fundamentalists. Also, "human decencies," such as what? Slavery? And i think you'll find the entire cotton industry in the south was entirely based on slavery, and as a result (although yes, partly due to the poor handling of Reconstruction) collapsed after the Civil War. Even had it been continued, the industry in the South was much weaker.
@WestTexasRebel "How in the hell could the war be about SLAVERY!!!!!"
B/c Lincoln was to "arrest the further spread of [slavery], & place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction."-Abe Lincoln, House Divided Speech, 1858.
"[CSA's] foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition."-VP of CSA
@festdir One word ...BULLSHIT! If the war was about slavery the abolishment would have been before April 12, 1861. You mean to tell me the North invaded my country when Slavery was constitutionally legal to free slaves to "stop the spread of slavery a constitutionally legal act in 1861, only 2% of the south even owned slaves!
@WestTexasRebel "One word..BULLSHIT" Regardless of such a well articulated and thought out response,
the VP of the CSA disagreed "[CSAs] cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition"-Alex H. Stephens Mar. 21, 1861
Also S.C.'s Declaration of Succeeding included the electing of a new president “whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery.”
@PSTripler I've heard rhetoric like that before. Let me see... didn't it go something like "Ein volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer"? (One people, one nation, one leader). This is the mentality of the US imperialists today. Welcome to fascist USA. Very strange mentality for people to have in a country that founded on secession and claims that it believes in self-government and independence. As everyone ought to be able to see, it's a lie.
My Lord, can someone be that stupid? Al Sharpton is a very dangerous person concerning freedom of assembly and speech. These individuals are counting on ignorance and emotion for their livelihood. I've never seen a more dangerous time in America.
@controversyking Nobody sees the white man as deserving of this inherent right of being able to preserve his own race if that is what he chooses. Nobody would deny blacks right to their neighborhoods and while others are welcomed people understand that their neighborhoods are essential for continued black existence. The are not seen as undeserving of this. Only whites are. They force us to see our neighborhoods as "equal" instead of white. Anyone's land
@controversyking This is not being hateful or intolerant it is reality. Whether we are talking about Nigeria or England as long as the vast majority remains the same the countries race will remain the same. Nature is competition. If everyone's numbers were equal and we were similar enough to each other to live under the same Government and every races inherent right of self preservation including their own land was aknowledged there wouldn't be any "racism".
@Luigi84289 The blacks and whites numbers being so similar in the south made the south one of the most peaceful places when it came to race relations. This is why blacks and whites in the south get along so well today. We aknowledge that the land belongs to one race just as much as the other and we both have a common culture and heritage that deserves preservation.
@controversyking Racism does not exist. The problem is that whites are the vast majority. If minorities consider themselves American and live in the same country eventually like with my native american grandmother the majorities race becomes the sole race of the region. What minorities are trying to do is curb our numbers because whether they realize it or not they all want to take control of America and make it theirs or take American land for themselves, for their nation.
I hope I won't be blocked from this channel over my comments. Even though I disagree with the South on some of what happened I still enjoy watching the videos on this channel.
I wanted to put this with my previous comment but I was over the character limit.
@nbenicewicz No, you certainly won't be blocked. I'm not a supporter of slavery and have never met anyone who does support it. One doesn't have to support slavery to be pro-secession or pro-South.
@RedShirtArmy I thank you for not blocking me. I've been visiting this channel for around two years but I still disagree with some things you say. From what I've found out the "Civil War" was fought for in "Part" over slavery, it may or may not have been "THE" reason but it was "A" reason. There were slave owners of the South (& North) who did not want to let go of what they considered their right, I have heard & seen quotes from people in that war that confuse to me as to which side was right.
@nbenicewicz Slavery was surely a major issue of the time & most Southern leaders wanted to maintain it, however, Lincoln promised them it would be maintained if they stayed in the Union. He primarily didn't want to see it spread to the Western States and he wanted a huge tariff to protect Northern industry from competition. If Southern leaders had wanted above all to protect slavery they would have stayed in the Union. But obviously other issues such as the tariff & independence mattered more.
@RedShirtArmy Didn't I also hear something to the effect that the CSA Constitution was set up to restart the slave trade, and I think I also heard that a state couldn't be part of the Confederacy if they wanted to be slave free? But I also heard that the Confederacy passed a law that banned the importation of slaves. Naturally I'm confused. I may not have supported the Confederacy back then but I think I could support what I call the "New South" today if its a society free of Racism and Slavery.
@nbenicewicz The constitution stipulates that the slave trade was not going to be apart of the new confederation. Slaves could be moved from state to state within the confederacy but they could not be brought in from anywhere else. The problem we have is the radicalism instilled in our school children towards this subject. What slavery actually was is never taught. Only lies and half truths. Slavery is dependence. It has never been taken care of just expanded upon since the war.
@nbenicewicz There is no instantaneous way to make a dependent independent. They have to have the proper education and the tools necessary to sustain themselves. What the abolitionists believed in was crazy because they knew what it took for the north to get to almost being rid of it and that all they were doing was stirring up trouble. The south was trying to maintain stability and keep as much liberty and freedom as it could to work towards one day being a confederation of free men.
What always amazes me is how proud the blacks are of the buffalo soldiers who went west after the South was defeated and helped run the Indians off their land.
Hilarious hypocrisy.
It will take more than a few election cycles to fix this mess if it can be fixed. Think Normandy.
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.
Schultz & Sharpton are total despicable assholes anyway, they try to insinuate that just conservatives, libertarians and members of the Tea Party movement are evil, racist and despicable. Even if they also disagree with the South. I've mentioned before on this channel that I somewhat disagree with the South. Slavery may or may not have been "THE" reason but it was "A" reason.
Peace can be found in the south. Hell and devil/debt can be found in the north. Wealth is in the East and slavery is in the west.
ED Shill, it in the name. ED U CAN`T(educate) lie to the American people, keep trying the citizen fool.Ed does look like a racist red neck roaster when he open is sh!thole,he must be looking to get his neck clip by AL boys.
It makes me furious beyond words. And I rarely lose my temper. Also, it is quite sad to see such a lack of education. As said, the victor writes history.... which leads me to wonder what else we "know" that is incorrect. At any rate, I am proud to be a Southerner.
Ed Schultz is an idiot, and I'm not saying that because of his views here. I had the unfortunate opportunity to listen to many of Ed Schultz's radio programs. The guy's just a plain ol' jerk! I can agree to disagree with someone, but Ed Schultz is just plain rude and loves to hear himself scream.
Ignorance personified in Mr. Shultz. Texas needs to secede. Our own governor, Rick. Perry, has said this. The federal government is not protecting out national borders from narco-terrorists and parts of Texas and Arizona are not controlled by our country and have signs posted to the effect that safety is not guaranteed. We have been attacked and the American Gov. has retreated. Good video. Preserve truth.
I'm reading a book on the southern secession. This is my third book on Lincoln & the south. I've read Di'lorenzo's books and watched countless hours of vids. but this is the most powerfull argument that I've heard regarding southern secession.
RSA, I highly recommend "Lincoln Uber Alles: Dictatorship comes to America" by John Emison. Its brand new & exposes Lincoln's marxist connections & illegitimacy. infact I just got my 2nd copy!
While you're at it, read the book "Bitterly Divided, The South's Inner Civil War", by David Williams...a Southern author.
Documents a different Southern perspective of the war.
Yes or No...if Southern states had the right to secede, without the consent of the rest of the nation, then portions of those states also had the right to vote to remain in the Union, and secede from the CSA?
@UnionStatesHeritage That's a consistent position, I think. As a libertarian I would support that. I'm happy being a South Carolinian but if some part of SC wanted to break away I would have no problem with that. I would dispute your use of the word "nation" to describe the USA though. This word isn't used in the Constitution. A nation signifies a single people, which the peoples of the US have never been. A nation is a distinct culture while the US has many national cultures.
Another question...New Mexico and Colorado territories deserved the right to decide whether or not to join the CSA, without military intervention (invasion) from the CSA?
Read up on the New Mexico Campaign...personally authorized by Jeff Davis. The
attempted invasion and annexation of two US territories that did not want to join the CSA.
"we will never submit to the enemy's military, or his slave despotism"...New Mexico Territorial legislature calling for volunteers.
@UnionStatesHeritage Yes, but the people of NM were Southern. They weren't allowed to be a State b/c of the Union's desire not to have another Southern State. That's why it took so long for the US to make them a State, long after the war's end. The CS sent troops into the area, but they were welcomed. The US then sent troops into the area & conquered it.
Another problem is WV. The US illegally made it a State even though the people were divided - pro-South folks weren't allowed to vote.
Having lived in the Southwest, and being familiar with some of the areas history, I can tell you that you don't know what you're talking about.
New Mexico had some people who were pro-CSA mainly in the Southern part of the Territory...most of whom were Texas transplants...the Confederate state which spearheaded the invasion.
"they were welcomed"...no they weren't. The New Mexico and Colorado Volunteers drove the Confederates back to TX, where they came from.
Before the war even started, while Jeff Davis was telling the world, that "The South just wanted to be left alone", CO Territorial Gov. William Gilpin correctly predicted that the CSA would invade CO & NM in attempt to conquer territory, and seize the mineral wealth in CO's gold fields.
"The US then sent troops into the area & conquered it."
No, the US sent most of its troops east. The West was left largely to fend for itself. That "invading" Union army was made up of VOLUNTEERS defending their homes from Confederate aggression.
@UnionStatesHeritage That's certainly a pro-Union take on the situation. Look, you can try to defend US aggression all you want. But what you're doing is dodging the fundamental issue that people should have the right to be independent. The US denied the South this right. If you want to defend what has today become an empire then feel free to do so. But what that amounts to is taking a position against self-determination. If you're comfortable with that, so be it. I'm not.
I like how you broke it down conversation to conversation that they had with each other and then your opinion afterwards.
Lets be honest...we knew this was going to happen and be the outcome especially dealing with Al Sharpton....its crazy that most Americans actually think that way and they don't know the truth because they refuse to do their own research and actually find out the truth.
I'm going to do my video on this subject very soon.
@TheMindFarter Absolutely! Did you know that Scots from N. Ireland were one of the largest ethnic groups in the Southern Army? US Senator Jack Webb wrote a book called "Born Fighting" that describes the role of the Scot-Irish in American culture and military history, which is a disproportionately large role.
@ohbobsagetpiss I generally don't talk about my religious views on here because it tends to divide the people I am attempting to reach. I just focus on Southern issues and the liberty/independence movement.
TO HELL with these DAMN YANKEES! Shultz is an uneducated imbecile, a perfect example of a carpet bagger.
miket1m 7 months ago
BTW I believe Lincoln did NOT call up a force to invade Virginia, as Virginia was still part of the Union. Lincoln called for Virginia to invade South Carolina, 70,000 troops, when called to do so they refused and seceded as they then realized that the Union is overstepping beyond return.
mugelerm 7 months ago
Al Sharpton is a joke, he clearly has no historical understanding of the United States and most definitely the War for Southern Independence.
mugelerm 7 months ago
This kind of blatant lying and misleading in the media really makes me angry. They will get away with it though, because what little education people are given in school is in line with what they say in the media. Unless a person goes out and does some research for themselves, they'll never KNOW that sharpton and schultz were fabricating the majority of what they said. Education is the biggest problem that I can see here. The Public School system has failed us and our children.
superbaron1 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thanks for your channel, one good thing Lincoln did was he went against the central banking to pay for the war, that was why he died
tylrjsph 11 months ago
thanks for your channel, one good thing about Lincoln was he went agains the central banks to pay for the war, that was he died
tylrjsph 11 months ago
Al Sharpton @8:25 "Can you imagine anywhere in the world, that people would sit around a celebrate people that declared war and actually killed people, against their country?"
Um.... Yes Al, actually I can. We all do it... Every 4th of July. Classic hypocritical stuff..
cwbuff44 1 year ago
Dixie haters prove that they don't know anything about us, and don't even want to know anything about us; why should we share a government with them?
Secession now, Freedom forever!
CelticSouthland 1 year ago
@PSTripler Before the 7 years war control of the colonies was local the shift towards more and more centralized control to pay for the war is what caused the secession. Englishmen were trying to financially enslave other Englishmen.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@PSTripler There were two cultures. The northern states made up the majority of congress. Jefferson and all the founding fathers supported secession. They did it. Any state can leave at any time. We are all free if a group of us want a new government it is our right. If the people in power want to look at it as treason let them. The British look at American Secession as treason.
Luigi84289 1 year ago 2
@PSTripler No it would make us pro American. We won the American Revolution to ensure control of our land remained in our hands. The war for Southern Independence was no different. The South was fighting so it's people could be free. So they could live under a Constitutional Government that represented them not one controlled by a Northern Majority. That is America. We are rebels. We believe in the people not the ones in power. Mel Gibson wasn't fighting the colonists.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@Luigi84289 "The South was fighting so it's people could be free."
Fighting for slavery is "fighting so ppl could be free"?!?
This is the GREATEST example of Southern 'intelligence' ever put into writing.
Thank you for this, really.
festdir 1 year ago
@festdir Who was fighting for slavery? You have completely bought the Yankee myth of the war. Secession was in part motivated by the slavery question, though there are other major issues such as the tariff (the South was paying 80% of the Federal budget and most of the 4 was being spent on Northern project). But the people of the South (over 90% of whom owned no slaves) didn't fight so rich men could keep their slaves. They fought to protect their families and homes from an invasion.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy "Who was fighting for slavery?"
Let's ask the VP of the CSA..."Our new govt is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition."
Lets ask South Carolina "election of a man to the high office of President of the US whose opinions and purposes are hostile to Slavery."
'Facts'-Not your style.
festdir 1 year ago
@festdir Now you have changed the subject. You're now talking about the opinions of the VP of the CSA gov't, not the reason people fought in the war. Stevens, like most White people in both the North and South did not believe in racial equality. But this has nothing to do with why people actually picked up guns and resisted the invasion of the Federal military. The average person had no slaves and fought because the South was invaded.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
Comment removed
FlashVirus 9 months ago
@festdir
Yes, just like the American colonists rebelled against British Empire for the sake of freedom, despite having slaves.
FlashVirus 9 months ago
@FlashVirus Was slavery the primary motivation for the war? NOPE!
Slavery was by far the most important issue to secessionists.
SPQRomantic 8 months ago
@SPQRomantic Good way of stating it. Yes they seceded over slavery to a point, but keep in mind even Lincoln promised a constitutional amendment to guarantee the right to own slaves! Only in return to stay in the union. so clearly it was beyond that issue. Then move on to the fact that Lincoln wanted to rid America to be deported to colonize Liberia...
mugelerm 7 months ago
Very well said! Everything that you said on this video is the TRUTH!
TexasRebel1965 1 year ago
I'm from Lyman South Carolina, u aware where thats at?
I live in Shelby North Carolina ATM.
I hate to say it man, but the carolinas will be overflooded with yankees if somthing doesn't happen.. Georgia/Florida/NorthCarolina/and SouthCarolina have rapid amounts of northerners moving here... South Carolina joined the list of fastest growing states in 2010..
If this keeps up, you will literally have no chance of secession with the majority of people living here aren't even natives.
Hellzyeah1990 1 year ago
@Hellzyeah1990 Yes, it's sad what is happening to us.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy Then how do you have any hope of secession when us natives are becoming the minority in our own homeland?
Hellzyeah1990 1 year ago
@Hellzyeah1990 Well, it will be increasingly difficult the more time goes by. I'm not going to lie to you. Of course, I'm in contact and even friends with some Northerners who support secession and moved down here to get active for that purpose. I hope that as the dollar collapses and DC becomes more and more tyrannical that people will decide to break with the Feds. It may come down to a de facto secession even within the state - I just don't know. But I don't think it's good to lose all hope.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
everybody loves to make fun of people from the south.....im from georgia and my accent turns on and off
charliezombie1 1 year ago
@PSTripler The states are America if the North seceded do you believe that would make them anti-american? If the southern democrats had won the presidency some of the northern republican states would have most likely left.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
i like your term "profesional victim", it describes Al Sharpton perfectly
blackraider777 1 year ago
@PSTripler stfu moron
blackraider777 1 year ago
An excellent video rebuttal! Good work RedShirtArmy. Keep it up.
Rbander1967 1 year ago
"...and died, duh some of them" What a douchebag...
AgenteMadreo 1 year ago
@m3i0wnu I'm not going to try and make any point or talk you or anyone else into understanding any point, quite frankly I could careless if you like it or not, I could careless what your opinion is or your thoughts on the subject.
If you don't agree, you can kiss my Southern ass!
WestTexasRebel 1 year ago
4 Why did you remark on the size of the protest? Why the laughter? Is the size relevant e to the importance of the issue?
Your own protests are much smaller, yet you hold the issue of secession as important.
5.Your compatriot w/out the hat was more conciliatory in tone,& I agree with some of his remarks.
Did the right of self-determination apply to negroes at the time of secession?
6. Why did you remove my questions previously?
(Again these relate to the Secession Gala video)
HioPojac 1 year ago
1. Your friend in the hat called the protest 'fake'. What did he mean?
2. You remarked in the video, that since the protesters left it was "alot safer to be here". Did you feel threatened by the protest? If so, why? If not, why make the remarks?
3. Do you think other people might feel threatened at your own protests? Do you think it is safer for other people in the area, when your group finishes a protest and leaves?
HioPojac 1 year ago
On the video 'Secession Gala & NAACP Protest Against Southern Heritage' I posted 4 questions, under another account. You deleted the questions, and blocked the account. The questions were not abusive, aggressive or offensive.
They were reasonable, and delivered reasonably. They were honest inquiries.
Do you only allow comments you agree with on your videos?
I will repost the questions, with one more added, so viewers can answer them, or judge if they should have been blocked.
HioPojac 1 year ago
Best one yet RedShirtArmy! keep them comming!
todddoom 1 year ago
amen to my southren brother from mississippi hill country!!!
1geared4hp 1 year ago
@PSTripler so you do not agree with his funding and isp service being cut off as soon as some juicy dirt on obama came out , right? or do you thin k he should expose obama's hypocrisy? you do know he has dirt on obama , dont you??
CANTWAIT42012 1 year ago
@PSTripler so you think the site should not be taken down even if it puts american lives in danger, if by nothing other that the justification jihadists will get to kill more americans? the soldier who leaked the classified info should be killed, the wikileaks asshole should be imprisoned for ignoriging the classified assignment of those documents. everyone knows what classified means and that there are consequences for not following the guidlines for an aussie rapist or anyone else
CANTWAIT42012 1 year ago
Post invasion they claim our government surrendered but we never did, they force economic poverty upon us and exploit the effects, inferring ignorance and stupidity and all this concealed in mis-truth and taught to our own children in schools our own tax's pay for, restricted from prayer but practiced in oath all meant to perpetuate in order to suppress.
DEO VINDICE!
WestTexasRebel 1 year ago 2
Yankees have been suppressing the South ever since before the invasion of 1861, the South represented Christianity, Human Decencies, Pride and Strong Family values the south was where the Arts thrived our cotton industry created growth for the entire nation's economy in the antebellum we represented everything the North strive to be but never could achieved.
WestTexasRebel 1 year ago
@WestTexasRebel Unfortunately, representing Christiantiy wouldn't be defined as a good thing by all people, mostly due to ridiculous bigotry on the part of fundamentalists. Also, "human decencies," such as what? Slavery? And i think you'll find the entire cotton industry in the south was entirely based on slavery, and as a result (although yes, partly due to the poor handling of Reconstruction) collapsed after the Civil War. Even had it been continued, the industry in the South was much weaker.
m3i0wnu 1 year ago
@m3i0wnu sick of Yankees alway bringing this up so I'll try and make it simple
1. In September 1862, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation the actual order was signed and issued January 1, 1863
2. Hostilities began on April 12, 1861
How in the hell could the war be about SLAVERY!!!!!
WestTexasRebel 1 year ago
@WestTexasRebel "How in the hell could the war be about SLAVERY!!!!!"
B/c Lincoln was to "arrest the further spread of [slavery], & place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction."-Abe Lincoln, House Divided Speech, 1858.
"[CSA's] foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition."-VP of CSA
festdir 1 year ago
@festdir One word ...BULLSHIT! If the war was about slavery the abolishment would have been before April 12, 1861. You mean to tell me the North invaded my country when Slavery was constitutionally legal to free slaves to "stop the spread of slavery a constitutionally legal act in 1861, only 2% of the south even owned slaves!
WestTexasRebel 1 year ago
@WestTexasRebel "One word..BULLSHIT" Regardless of such a well articulated and thought out response,
the VP of the CSA disagreed "[CSAs] cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition"-Alex H. Stephens Mar. 21, 1861
Also S.C.'s Declaration of Succeeding included the electing of a new president “whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery.”
'Facts'- Just not your style
festdir 1 year ago
@PSTripler what do you think of wikileaks?just wondering
CANTWAIT42012 1 year ago
@PSTripler I've heard rhetoric like that before. Let me see... didn't it go something like "Ein volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer"? (One people, one nation, one leader). This is the mentality of the US imperialists today. Welcome to fascist USA. Very strange mentality for people to have in a country that founded on secession and claims that it believes in self-government and independence. As everyone ought to be able to see, it's a lie.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
Michael I would like to speak to you my email is statesrights1861@yahoo.com Keep the heat on them.
sccavlady 1 year ago
Michael I would like to speak to youmy email is statesrights1861@yahoo.com Keep the heat on them.
sccavlady 1 year ago
@sccavlady The easiest way to speak to me is just to message me here on YouTube. Sound ok?
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
This is an excellent breakdown and analysis. God bless the South!
TheBullionBull 1 year ago
My Lord, can someone be that stupid? Al Sharpton is a very dangerous person concerning freedom of assembly and speech. These individuals are counting on ignorance and emotion for their livelihood. I've never seen a more dangerous time in America.
nomadak47 1 year ago
@controversyking Nobody sees the white man as deserving of this inherent right of being able to preserve his own race if that is what he chooses. Nobody would deny blacks right to their neighborhoods and while others are welcomed people understand that their neighborhoods are essential for continued black existence. The are not seen as undeserving of this. Only whites are. They force us to see our neighborhoods as "equal" instead of white. Anyone's land
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@controversyking This is not being hateful or intolerant it is reality. Whether we are talking about Nigeria or England as long as the vast majority remains the same the countries race will remain the same. Nature is competition. If everyone's numbers were equal and we were similar enough to each other to live under the same Government and every races inherent right of self preservation including their own land was aknowledged there wouldn't be any "racism".
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@Luigi84289 The blacks and whites numbers being so similar in the south made the south one of the most peaceful places when it came to race relations. This is why blacks and whites in the south get along so well today. We aknowledge that the land belongs to one race just as much as the other and we both have a common culture and heritage that deserves preservation.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@controversyking Racism does not exist. The problem is that whites are the vast majority. If minorities consider themselves American and live in the same country eventually like with my native american grandmother the majorities race becomes the sole race of the region. What minorities are trying to do is curb our numbers because whether they realize it or not they all want to take control of America and make it theirs or take American land for themselves, for their nation.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
I hope I won't be blocked from this channel over my comments. Even though I disagree with the South on some of what happened I still enjoy watching the videos on this channel.
I wanted to put this with my previous comment but I was over the character limit.
nbenicewicz 1 year ago
@nbenicewicz No, you certainly won't be blocked. I'm not a supporter of slavery and have never met anyone who does support it. One doesn't have to support slavery to be pro-secession or pro-South.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy I thank you for not blocking me. I've been visiting this channel for around two years but I still disagree with some things you say. From what I've found out the "Civil War" was fought for in "Part" over slavery, it may or may not have been "THE" reason but it was "A" reason. There were slave owners of the South (& North) who did not want to let go of what they considered their right, I have heard & seen quotes from people in that war that confuse to me as to which side was right.
nbenicewicz 1 year ago
@nbenicewicz Slavery was surely a major issue of the time & most Southern leaders wanted to maintain it, however, Lincoln promised them it would be maintained if they stayed in the Union. He primarily didn't want to see it spread to the Western States and he wanted a huge tariff to protect Northern industry from competition. If Southern leaders had wanted above all to protect slavery they would have stayed in the Union. But obviously other issues such as the tariff & independence mattered more.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy Didn't I also hear something to the effect that the CSA Constitution was set up to restart the slave trade, and I think I also heard that a state couldn't be part of the Confederacy if they wanted to be slave free? But I also heard that the Confederacy passed a law that banned the importation of slaves. Naturally I'm confused. I may not have supported the Confederacy back then but I think I could support what I call the "New South" today if its a society free of Racism and Slavery.
nbenicewicz 1 year ago
@nbenicewicz The constitution stipulates that the slave trade was not going to be apart of the new confederation. Slaves could be moved from state to state within the confederacy but they could not be brought in from anywhere else. The problem we have is the radicalism instilled in our school children towards this subject. What slavery actually was is never taught. Only lies and half truths. Slavery is dependence. It has never been taken care of just expanded upon since the war.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
@nbenicewicz There is no instantaneous way to make a dependent independent. They have to have the proper education and the tools necessary to sustain themselves. What the abolitionists believed in was crazy because they knew what it took for the north to get to almost being rid of it and that all they were doing was stirring up trouble. The south was trying to maintain stability and keep as much liberty and freedom as it could to work towards one day being a confederation of free men.
Luigi84289 1 year ago
What always amazes me is how proud the blacks are of the buffalo soldiers who went west after the South was defeated and helped run the Indians off their land.
Hilarious hypocrisy.
It will take more than a few election cycles to fix this mess if it can be fixed. Think Normandy.
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.
waypasthadenough 1 year ago
Schultz & Sharpton are total despicable assholes anyway, they try to insinuate that just conservatives, libertarians and members of the Tea Party movement are evil, racist and despicable. Even if they also disagree with the South. I've mentioned before on this channel that I somewhat disagree with the South. Slavery may or may not have been "THE" reason but it was "A" reason.
nbenicewicz 1 year ago 3
Al Sharpton is a professional retard.
pkpk5770 1 year ago
Another fine installment, Thanks, RedShirtArmy
JesusDillinger 1 year ago
al sharpton is an idiot
stud915 1 year ago
And people wonder why we southrons can't "get over it."
wobgnol74 1 year ago
Peace can be found in the south. Hell and devil/debt can be found in the north. Wealth is in the East and slavery is in the west.
ED Shill, it in the name. ED U CAN`T(educate) lie to the American people, keep trying the citizen fool.Ed does look like a racist red neck roaster when he open is sh!thole,he must be looking to get his neck clip by AL boys.
SteveXnycperformance 1 year ago
It makes me furious beyond words. And I rarely lose my temper. Also, it is quite sad to see such a lack of education. As said, the victor writes history.... which leads me to wonder what else we "know" that is incorrect. At any rate, I am proud to be a Southerner.
RiverBirch1967 1 year ago
Ed Schultz is an idiot, and I'm not saying that because of his views here. I had the unfortunate opportunity to listen to many of Ed Schultz's radio programs. The guy's just a plain ol' jerk! I can agree to disagree with someone, but Ed Schultz is just plain rude and loves to hear himself scream.
jmelkis 1 year ago
Amen Brother ! with you all the way. Ed Schultz is ignorant of the facts.
kurtusloew 1 year ago
the government media complex has to remind you the virtue and benevolence of the federal government.
abortabraham 1 year ago
The U.S media lies???shocker haha.
Deo Vindice
IslandersMets10 1 year ago
Wonder how he reacts fo Civil War reinactments... *facepalm* That fucktard is reciting government indoctrination.
Hey, if you send me a pm w/ an address you tust me to have, I'll see if I can find some marshmellow shnops to send you, and yes, I'm serious.
LiberAnarchy 1 year ago
@CarolinaCountryGuy the closest Census done by the United States before the war
JohnnyGuitar79 1 year ago
This was a fantastic video. very informative. faved.
return135 1 year ago
@return135 Thanks!
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@CarolinaCountryGuy I've read that in several history books actually. I'll see if I can't find a source for you.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
You should send him this video; he might watch it, you never know. Its worth a try.
return135 1 year ago
Ignorance personified in Mr. Shultz. Texas needs to secede. Our own governor, Rick. Perry, has said this. The federal government is not protecting out national borders from narco-terrorists and parts of Texas and Arizona are not controlled by our country and have signs posted to the effect that safety is not guaranteed. We have been attacked and the American Gov. has retreated. Good video. Preserve truth.
lonestarskywatcher 1 year ago
@lonestarskywatcher Free Texas, free the South!
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
This is top nosh education dude.
lucretiuscaro 1 year ago
@lucretiuscaro Appreciate it!
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
great video, just shows how ignorant most americans are becoming by thinking the media knows everything and when they dont even know our own history.
bigjames88 1 year ago 3
@bigjames88 Thanks!
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
WoW! what a line up!
Ed Sch(muck) and Al (not so) Sharp-ton!
I'm reading a book on the southern secession. This is my third book on Lincoln & the south. I've read Di'lorenzo's books and watched countless hours of vids. but this is the most powerfull argument that I've heard regarding southern secession.
RSA, I highly recommend "Lincoln Uber Alles: Dictatorship comes to America" by John Emison. Its brand new & exposes Lincoln's marxist connections & illegitimacy. infact I just got my 2nd copy!
joeymackaroni 1 year ago 2
@joeymackaroni
While you're at it, read the book "Bitterly Divided, The South's Inner Civil War", by David Williams...a Southern author.
Documents a different Southern perspective of the war.
Yes or No...if Southern states had the right to secede, without the consent of the rest of the nation, then portions of those states also had the right to vote to remain in the Union, and secede from the CSA?
UnionStatesHeritage 1 year ago
@UnionStatesHeritage That's a consistent position, I think. As a libertarian I would support that. I'm happy being a South Carolinian but if some part of SC wanted to break away I would have no problem with that. I would dispute your use of the word "nation" to describe the USA though. This word isn't used in the Constitution. A nation signifies a single people, which the peoples of the US have never been. A nation is a distinct culture while the US has many national cultures.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@joeymackaroni
Another question...New Mexico and Colorado territories deserved the right to decide whether or not to join the CSA, without military intervention (invasion) from the CSA?
Read up on the New Mexico Campaign...personally authorized by Jeff Davis. The
attempted invasion and annexation of two US territories that did not want to join the CSA.
"we will never submit to the enemy's military, or his slave despotism"...New Mexico Territorial legislature calling for volunteers.
UnionStatesHeritage 1 year ago
@UnionStatesHeritage Yes, but the people of NM were Southern. They weren't allowed to be a State b/c of the Union's desire not to have another Southern State. That's why it took so long for the US to make them a State, long after the war's end. The CS sent troops into the area, but they were welcomed. The US then sent troops into the area & conquered it.
Another problem is WV. The US illegally made it a State even though the people were divided - pro-South folks weren't allowed to vote.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy
Having lived in the Southwest, and being familiar with some of the areas history, I can tell you that you don't know what you're talking about.
New Mexico had some people who were pro-CSA mainly in the Southern part of the Territory...most of whom were Texas transplants...the Confederate state which spearheaded the invasion.
"they were welcomed"...no they weren't. The New Mexico and Colorado Volunteers drove the Confederates back to TX, where they came from.
UnionStatesHeritage 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy
Before the war even started, while Jeff Davis was telling the world, that "The South just wanted to be left alone", CO Territorial Gov. William Gilpin correctly predicted that the CSA would invade CO & NM in attempt to conquer territory, and seize the mineral wealth in CO's gold fields.
UnionStatesHeritage 1 year ago
@RedShirtArmy
"The US then sent troops into the area & conquered it."
No, the US sent most of its troops east. The West was left largely to fend for itself. That "invading" Union army was made up of VOLUNTEERS defending their homes from Confederate aggression.
There's a big difference.
UnionStatesHeritage 1 year ago
@UnionStatesHeritage That's certainly a pro-Union take on the situation. Look, you can try to defend US aggression all you want. But what you're doing is dodging the fundamental issue that people should have the right to be independent. The US denied the South this right. If you want to defend what has today become an empire then feel free to do so. But what that amounts to is taking a position against self-determination. If you're comfortable with that, so be it. I'm not.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
This is an excellent video man.
I like how you broke it down conversation to conversation that they had with each other and then your opinion afterwards.
Lets be honest...we knew this was going to happen and be the outcome especially dealing with Al Sharpton....its crazy that most Americans actually think that way and they don't know the truth because they refuse to do their own research and actually find out the truth.
I'm going to do my video on this subject very soon.
Thanks again!
OneWayRawk 1 year ago
@OneWayRawk Thank you, kindly. I'm glad you liked the video.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
Free Dixie!
Free Scotland!
Self determination is the right of every sovereign nation of people. The south will always have a friend in Scotland!
TheMindFarter 1 year ago
@TheMindFarter Absolutely! Scots and Southrons are cousins - and hopefully will remain close forever.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago 6
@TheMindFarter Absolutely! Did you know that Scots from N. Ireland were one of the largest ethnic groups in the Southern Army? US Senator Jack Webb wrote a book called "Born Fighting" that describes the role of the Scot-Irish in American culture and military history, which is a disproportionately large role.
TheBullionBull 1 year ago
Damn good video man. Keep fighting for our rights, you deserve a spot on tv more than that Schultz guy.
DustinCSA 1 year ago
@DustinCSA Thank you, Dustin!
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago
Do you hold religious views RSA? Just curious.
ohbobsagetpiss 1 year ago
@ohbobsagetpiss I generally don't talk about my religious views on here because it tends to divide the people I am attempting to reach. I just focus on Southern issues and the liberty/independence movement.
RedShirtArmy 1 year ago