i know this is a little cheap i pop the DVD into my computer when it's up to the scene that's been deleted i play it [which i previously downloaded better than buying it again{i want to kill whoever edited the film
Personally, I think they should have left the movie alone. I live in America, and they show more violence on the evening news than any other show. So, in America it's okay to show bloody and dead bodies, blown up cars from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but you can show two animated characters kissing? That's a bunch of BS!!!
Because that is the original name of the movie. Only the edited version used the title "The invisibles", and even there, that word is never used in the movie.
Besson commented that the Weinsteins thought, americans could not say "Minimoys"
I saw this movie at its theatrical release in Paris, in one of the only theaters where it was airing in English: and I swear to you: the very title written on the screen was ARTHUR AND THE MINIMOYS, not the Invisibles.
In the opening of the unmodified version, it was Arthur's grandpa you hear as the narrator: in the modified version, it's an unseen man with an English accent. And in the unmodified version, Arthur's phone conversation with his parents is not overdubbed by the narrator's comments
Wow. So many deleted scenes. I watched the europeon version... Whell I think the only scene, that should be deleted - is the one where he takes her bra`s lase.
What are the USA guys trying to do? They take out Love, violence, etc. What does that leave? Boring scenes.
In the book, it explains... "since she is only ten, there is actually nothing to see, but it is really a problem of protocol, princess do not go topless"
They BUTCHERED the N. American version! I guess it is the same thing as The Professional vs. Leon. Amazing how censored stuff is in America. Gross even.
Thank you for posting these! I am ordering the international version ASAP.
And for the record - the game KICKS BUTT! It is the best game based on a movie I have ever played.
The quote explains will why Arthur could get the Sword, and Selenia not.
Selenia hates Matlhazard, she wants revenge, Arthur feels sorry for him, he wants justice. In the books this is explained from the begining. Is strange why the phrase was cut.
really? so...thats why selenia didnt get the sword! i didn't know that! i live in the philippines i only saw the american version... that's why there are a lot of questions roaming around my mind!
Really? Well, it's not BAD, it's just not necessary. The guy has lost and in the version I had seen he just goes away. The whole thing with the gun and the complete explanation of his evil plan, and the tribe inside the house with their spears and the policemen paying no attention to them... I don't know. It's ok, just not one of the best scenes.
interesting. On my part i think it was necesary to explain why he was so obsessed to get the property. And also to show that to have a some two meter high warriors in your yard , could have some errrr.. utility.. :)
That scene was imported to the movie.
CommentFavsguy 2 years ago
i know this is a little cheap i pop the DVD into my computer when it's up to the scene that's been deleted i play it [which i previously downloaded better than buying it again{i want to kill whoever edited the film
plazcheetah 2 years ago
Personally, I think they should have left the movie alone. I live in America, and they show more violence on the evening news than any other show. So, in America it's okay to show bloody and dead bodies, blown up cars from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but you can show two animated characters kissing? That's a bunch of BS!!!
LadyJade28 2 years ago
what virsion is it! I NEED TO GET A COPY OF THE ONE THAT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE CRAP
CnCGman 2 years ago
err.. this is the mexican version...
Koolomassai 2 years ago
i knew i wasnt crazy i saw this movieback to france at the cinema then i bought the dvd in australia and allhe funny part of the movie was gone!!!
i definitly need to get the french dvd
frenchy4001 3 years ago
You can get any european version... since it will contain the unedited english version, plus the local version.
This scenes are from the mexican version... I has the mexican spanish version, plus the full english version.
Only the american version was cut, so it is the english version ditribuited by the Weinstein company.
Koolomassai 2 years ago
wait why is the title "minimoys" if its the english versison?
StRaWbErRy709 3 years ago
Because that is the original name of the movie. Only the edited version used the title "The invisibles", and even there, that word is never used in the movie.
Besson commented that the Weinsteins thought, americans could not say "Minimoys"
Koolomassai 3 years ago
oh i get it now. thanks!
StRaWbErRy709 3 years ago
the word invisibles is used at the end credits. It is sung by the kid raper. Just listin
GreenRey 2 years ago
Kid raper?!?! Oo
johananas 2 years ago
lolllllll
RaiderSelenia 2 years ago
I saw this movie at its theatrical release in Paris, in one of the only theaters where it was airing in English: and I swear to you: the very title written on the screen was ARTHUR AND THE MINIMOYS, not the Invisibles.
In the opening of the unmodified version, it was Arthur's grandpa you hear as the narrator: in the modified version, it's an unseen man with an English accent. And in the unmodified version, Arthur's phone conversation with his parents is not overdubbed by the narrator's comments
lolitaphile 2 years ago
Wow. So many deleted scenes. I watched the europeon version... Whell I think the only scene, that should be deleted - is the one where he takes her bra`s lase.
What are the USA guys trying to do? They take out Love, violence, etc. What does that leave? Boring scenes.
alexanderblums 3 years ago
In the book, it explains... "since she is only ten, there is actually nothing to see, but it is really a problem of protocol, princess do not go topless"
Koolomassai 3 years ago
srsly?
supertoastdemon 3 years ago
Probably because of the gun. Can't have our children knowing about those weapons. -.-'
SchokoladerJaeger 3 years ago 5
HAHAHA LOL good one
coconut769 3 years ago 4
This scene kinda sucks, I dont think the american version would've been any better with it.
Gokuromario 3 years ago
lol the movie gotta be like 10min with all that deleted stuff.....
SvuuPp 3 years ago 3
omg i luv his version best! so cool and it explains why she said only the first kiss of a princess can break malthzars spell!
Babiebutt666 3 years ago 2
çok güzelolmuş teprikler mehmet
bunebeea 3 years ago
Wut was wrong with that scene??? There wasnt even anything about Selena! *sigh of exasperation*
NewDawnAugust 3 years ago 2
They BUTCHERED the N. American version! I guess it is the same thing as The Professional vs. Leon. Amazing how censored stuff is in America. Gross even.
Thank you for posting these! I am ordering the international version ASAP.
And for the record - the game KICKS BUTT! It is the best game based on a movie I have ever played.
TrixNStix 4 years ago 5
Also another interesting fact: all the N. American voice actors SUCKED! Seriously! They changed them!
BlackCerberus 4 years ago
missed one scene I know of...well, it's more like a line...
American Version:
"I hope he burns"
"Let's go, Selenia"
Original:
"I hope he burns in hell..."
"He's already there, now let's go, Selenia"
BlackCerberus 4 years ago
Yes i remember that scene. I did not it was missing.. i will upload it too.
probably there are a lot of small cuts like that. The cut down film is shorter by 8 minutes.
Koolomassai 4 years ago
yeah...that was the best quote ever in the movie...also, can you get some clips of Mino...he was so cute <3
BlackCerberus 4 years ago
The quote explains will why Arthur could get the Sword, and Selenia not.
Selenia hates Matlhazard, she wants revenge, Arthur feels sorry for him, he wants justice. In the books this is explained from the begining. Is strange why the phrase was cut.
mhh, let me try get togheter some clips of Mino.
Koolomassai 4 years ago
omg! You're awesome! :D
BlackCerberus 4 years ago 2
really? so...thats why selenia didnt get the sword! i didn't know that! i live in the philippines i only saw the american version... that's why there are a lot of questions roaming around my mind!
crazybear048 4 years ago 2
There's something wrong with this scene. It works better as it is now.
Faunatik 4 years ago 2
What do you think is wrong?... after all, it was deleted only in the US
Koolomassai 4 years ago
Really? Well, it's not BAD, it's just not necessary. The guy has lost and in the version I had seen he just goes away. The whole thing with the gun and the complete explanation of his evil plan, and the tribe inside the house with their spears and the policemen paying no attention to them... I don't know. It's ok, just not one of the best scenes.
Faunatik 4 years ago
interesting. On my part i think it was necesary to explain why he was so obsessed to get the property. And also to show that to have a some two meter high warriors in your yard , could have some errrr.. utility.. :)
Koolomassai 4 years ago
Ok. If it's an important explanation for you and other fans, then I guess it has its utility... <:)
Faunatik 4 years ago
its an awkward scene tbh.
all the other scenes should have stayed in there.
chelanfarsight 4 years ago 2
This is the only scene that had even the smallest real reason to be removed from the movie that I can find, and that's because of the gun.
Still, I don't think kids would go insane and start shooting their parents just because they see a gun in a movie.
LordNerevar 4 years ago 3
i do not think the guns.. i am shure they see bigeest guns in the TV..
I really think it is because the spears, there are four big guys with spears.. and worst, they are the good guys...
elnauhual 4 years ago