One thing is that I'm so wondered why they could make so car sound so quiet??? Unlike the Ferrari or the Lamborghini which had pretty much less horsepower, Can somebody explain it to me, please??? :)
one more thing: that engine can develop 1001ps while keeping the reliability because it HAS MORE STRUCTURE THAN A SUPRA ENGINE. when you all will have this in mind? you can have a 1.8L 4-cyl with 1500HP, but it will last only a single fucking pull.
People don't understand what it would mean to drive a 1001 hp car, let alone a 3000 hp car on the road.. It cant be done; YOU WOULD CRASH! This car is an amazing technical accomplishment.
@Jyrki1964 Then explain to me why McLaren chose to use a BMW V12 in their F1 GT? Hmm, still the worlds fastest NATURALLY ASPIRATED car. BMW makes remarkable engines, Their L6 engines have always been bullet proof, and the V8's and V10's also very powerful. LOL Veyron has 16 cylinders, 4 turbochargers AND variable valve timing and STILL isn't that fastest production car in the world.
I am not mocking BMW or AMG motors. I'm just sayin that Volkswagen has proved the world it is capable of making a car that is awesome in any measures of a supercar. Actually all measures. It has air conditioning, good noise reduction, stereos and, lots of other amenities and is easy and comfortable to drive in every day use.
Yes it is built to last and with a warranty. That is amazing.
It is not really that hard to tickle 1500 hp from a big engine, but when you drive it a while, It breaks. Veyron engine is made to last. That's why it has at least ten radiators. It's brakes are made to last. etc.. It is a marvellous piece of engineering.
@328iKid it's faster than almost any production car...the only one which is faster on acceleration is the SuperSport...when you tell a car is the fastest, you have to consider also the acceleration, not just top speed!! veyron has much faster acceleration than this crapy american piece of junk(ssc ultimate aero)....
@konsextus Look up the Koenigsegg Agera R. Wait till they confirm the top speed. Don't be ignorant, sure the SSC is much less advanced in the driving aid and creature comfort areas but it is definitely an impressive car in terms or design, the frame is extremely stiff and it does what the Veyron was basically made for, only slightly better. The Supersport of course is a different story.
@328iKid On paper the agera r is a bit slower than the "simple" veyron to 200km/h.. just 2 tenths of a sec...but slower...I also wait for the top speed of agera r. but the thing I know is that the veyron is not just a bit better than the aero...it is a lot better...almost no big car journalist talks about the aero in such good words as for the veyron...veyron is just something from a different planet...when aero just sooo isn't...
All this bullshit about it "only" having 1000 horsepower.... This engine is sold with a warranty and is built to last, as well as be drivable in everyday driving situations. You probably could get 4000 horsepower out of a W16 8.0 quad turbo but it probably couldn't be packaged in a reliable everyday car. I'm sure none of you would be complaining it wasn't fast enough if you'd had a ride in one
well if you just want more cylinders put 2 v12s together and call it a w24! not a hard thing to do but why?! twin turbo v8s make more power than this quad turbo w16!!! just a name for selling this piece of crap!
@tuugfo The problem is that the Bugatti Veyron has to last 10 to 20 years, more if properly maintained. The engine's characteristics are meant so that the car can be driven like a normal car. Turbocharging a Supra to 1400 HP will drastically reduce the life of the engine, making it prone to break down. The engine will also be very violent and the turbo lag will be very long, making the car impractical for anything other than racing.
@EventisInnovations Yes, but in the meantime, you can buy 140 replacement engines for your Supra. But that wouldn't attract the same women as a Veyron.
And attracting women is what exotic cars are about. God knows it isn't about performance or reliability.
@EventisInnovations The question is if the Enine of the Veyron would last 10 or 20 Years.Consider some Lambos, which lost their life with 50, 60,000 Kilometers or even earlier because of engine faults (or other strange faults). It´s like "a Mercedes it the best what you can get", as it was true 30 years ago; now look at some 7,8 years old S-Classes or E-Classes/Vitos which start to rust or other problems. So for me it has to be proven if a W16 would last as long as a normal engine.
Bugatti reported they have Veyron with 500,000 km on their counter. The engine is still running without a single issue. They are built like an aircraft. You should check Bugatti Veyron Man Made. Each Veyron have 500 km before being shipped to their owners.
@EventisInnovations BullShit..... Underground racing TT Lambos are a perfect example of a STREET car that can be daily driven. Those lambo's are putting out 1500AWHP. If the engine is built correctly and PROPERLY MAINTAINED, then even a 1400+ HP engine can last a long time. The only time you crazy power being made and breaking all the time is when the compression ratio is way high (15:1). Also, 10 to 20 years has nothing to do if the motor only have 200 miles on it witt proper oil changes....
@bottlefedtsi It is funny how you talk smack on cars you can neither own nor afford. Go back to driving your 89 Corolla and delivering pizzas, redneck.
@EventisInnovations You get a lot more bang for buck though with a supra. Chances are, you're not getting a Bugatti to get the most comfortable or efficient ride on the streets nor would you take it out to go buy your groceries.
@qfanization cut your W in have and u get VV (V-V ) which is the proper way to name it, go to Wikipedia for the full response on w and vv (v-v) engines that are 16 cylinder.
It's a shame they can't take this CGI technology and integrate into HS automotive classes. It doesn't replace getting your hands dirty and actually rebuilding a block, but to be able to remove parts while the engine is reciprocating (with the computer generation) does a helluva lot more than any book can!
@xXEnkeixpressXx Except that this isn't Bugatti at all. This is Volkswagen using the Bugatti name because they learned from the Phaeton that people pay too much attention to the badge on the car.
@blockinater Turbosupercharger is actually the correct full name of turbocharger. A turbo is actually a type of supercharger. Have to admit though that they probably only bothered to say the whole name here to make it sound more cool.
@anasamla Because they want it to be efficient and durable and not too noisy and street legal. Without these restrictions it becomes much easier to make 1000hp. If someone was to hotrod one of htese engines, without changing the displacement or setup at all, they could probably make at least 1800hp and if they don't care about street legal then probably more like 4000hp.
@Dima1415 Yeah, until it wears out in 100,000 kms and has to be rebuilt. Rotary engines are a nice idea, but they just don't last. Plus they run dirty and will eventually be unable to meet emission standards.
@Dima1415 id hardly call the engine worthless...im sure these master engineers thought of a rotary engine,obviously it diddnt meet the standards of the bugatti.Perhaps it wouldnt be able to handle everything else they did to the bugatti?
Why not build a rotary engine? For a bugatti veyron 1001hp 16 cylinder engine, an equivalent rotor engine (1001hp) would be more efficient and much better...
its impossible to build a 3000hp engine and get it to do full power continually for years....W16, W20 , 30 cylinder or not.
Unless you use a turbine engine, which is far simpler, far more efficient, more eco friendly,and gets 3000hp from the engine size of roughly the mclaren f1s...
The next step forward in more powerful engines in cars is a turbine, not pistons.
@ASSHOLELA Turbine engines don't idle very well compared with a piston engine, so you'd end up using more fuel in normal traffic conditions with a turbine engine.
i was arguing with a friend of mine he was saying that to get the 16 cylinders they put two v8s side by side but i didnt think it was possible or at least enginerable... my question now, is it possible two make such an engine, if so it would probly take one hell of a transmision, am i right?
@xXxDylan8milkxXx No transmission was in production that could take it and keep taking it for years so they had to commission one to be engineered specifically for the Veyron's drivetrain.
I don't even wanna commend on stupid reactions here, I'm a master engine builder. You CANT compare this with a V8. Bugatti's purpose is to build a " life worthy " car that can do 400 km/h until it goes to the scrapyard. You can't compare this high tech euro stuff to american junk. Get a life.
1000hp 16 cyl. engine does sound cool but its not very impressive. cadillac made a 1000hp v16 and it was NA. it could get 20mpg easily too, it just wasnt put into production.
20 mpg for Callidac Sixteen was never proved, it is only a claim. Its engine is huge and longer: 11.3L compared to 8.0L Quad-Turbo W16 engine from Veyron. Be in mind Cadillac Sixteen is a limousine not a luxury sport car.
pathetic, thats only 1hp per cubic inch, with 4 turbos!!! that thing better be able to run non stop because there is nothing high performance about that engine. The engines in Ferrari's are nearly 2hp per cubic inch from the factory. No wonder this thing weighs so much, the engine is a massive waste of weight. i would give up a bit of reliability for performance anyday. Its not like this car is a daily driver.
Only a few races, this thing needs to last a lifetime. No need to tell me what F1 is. But it is not in comparisation with the Bugattie engine. totally differemt purpose.
these v8s can put out 10000rpm for hours straight. and can last more than 20 minutes at full throttle. those engines engineered are virtually perfect. some of the clearances do not exceed .00001 and the buggati are still production line built where all of the parts come from a pre-fabricated set. instead of parts engineered and fabricated for that one engine only.
@halosux4life The engine in the Bugatti Veyron is capable of sustaining 1001 HP FAR LONGER than some race car engine can. Think in HOURS to understand this concept. You can take any other race car engine that makes this power and they will fail long before this engine fails if you hold them 1001HP continuously.
if this thing were maxed tuned it would only last as long as a maxed tuned v-6 or v-8. Probably shorter because it has more things to go wrong. the rotating mass is staggering. Maxed tuned v-8 with 4 turbos could make a couple thousand horse on far less desplacement. it would push 3-4 hp/cu. in. whereas this bugatti engine is only a mere 1hp/cubic inch. something that high performance flat head motors can easily surpass.
juls yes your right. you can squeeze hp out of anything strong enough. What your forgetting is the behavior of this motor. They designed it to have faultless power. You stamp, you get a linear power curve. no lag, all torque. smooth and comfortable but super fast. The car is an engineering showcase which broke new ground. Not a numbers chaser. top speed is limited. It did everything without fault. Speed, luxury, safety, comfort, reliability and ease of use. No super hp v8 will be easy to drive.
@slickstrings if they were really worried about the no lag part why didn't they put a supercharger on it instead? Also, what new ground did it break? the engine is nothing but unique and it has huge displacement. chassis controls (ride height and auto wing/air brake) are nothing new. The only thing that stands out on this car is the price tag and the engine displacement.
@slickstrings my bad, idk what i was looking at but i was thinking this was almost 1000cubic inch, it is just short of 500, which makes it a little cooler but still not that neat for all the turbos. It is far from high performance by any standard nonetheless.
@JulsJunior you need to define hi performance. If high performance means huge hp for its capacity, then perhaps not. But in terms of relevance, it is extremely high performance. Im sure if the engineers wanted they could boost it up and get 3000 hp out of this engine. But this car is actually restrained to perform in a very particular way. Its not a track car. More hp in this car would be like wanting concorde to perform like a fighter jet. Its not intended to.
@slickstrings i would liken high performance to density, you don't say a huge piece of aluminum is dense, you say its heavy. Tungsten or Iridium would be dense. However I have my doubts they could get 3000hp out of it. Perhaps with some hefty modifications, I think the W16 would look fragile once you started making it really run. You would have to build it more like diesel and keep the RPM down. I think the crank would be first to break, thats alot to ask out of one crank.
@JulsJunior your still calling it bad for something it never intended to be. If they wanted 3000hp out of this motor, they would have designed it to do so. Thats the whole point and people seem to miss that. Ive never heard one person who has actually driven it say, gee i wish it had more power. Its not built for lap times or dyno bragging rights. Its a demonstration of technical wonders. A car that pushed boundaries. they arnt even selling it for profit.
@JulsJunior i agree. on top gear, they said that at full throttle, the motor would self-destruct in around 25 minutes. fortunatly, it will run out of fuel in 15 minutes!
the motors 1000hp is not a 1st. but its one of the 1st 1000hp cars that can be driven on the street with comfort!
Maxed out, better get materials that candles the heat. When it was tested for the first time, it nearly destroyed the building because the exhausts burned. Lets not forget that engine is built for torque rather than horsepower.
@Tippotipo anything with 1000 cubic inch is going to have gobs of torque. Best I can see is that it makes pretty close to 1000ft-lbs of torque as well, which is also pathetic. A good turbo charged engine (top end) should make around 5 ft-lbs of torque per cubic inch, as you can see this doesn't even beat a mild running naturally aspirated engine. The Enzo makes 1.35 ft-lbs per cubic inch naturally aspirated and it is built for hp (1.32 hp per cubic inch). Your argument holds no weight.
@Tippotipo my bad, idk what i was looking at but i was thinking this was almost 1000cubic inch, it is just short of 500. still that is only equivalent to a well tuned naturally aspirated motor. a v-12 or v-16 would have similar reliability for an engine of this order.
you obviously dont know about v8. i've seen 2500hp TT big block v8s that get tuned down to 1000hp just to be reliable. and can get back to 2500hp with just a few switch flips for the drag strip. its been that way for a while, the fastest cars are always gonna have v8s in them
the thing now is, now everyone is trying to get be like bugatti and become a masterpiece. I hear zonda want a car that will do 278PMH? and i have a feeling more will look at how Bugatti did it and add their touch to it..but initially looking at bugatti's
the buggati has a slow launch cuz of its weight but when it reaches a certain speed it would shit on the car badly, so consider ur self lucky in the launch but lucky just for a few seconds .
this is a W engine design in which 2 engines are connected in cross positions and deliver horsepower to crank in cross this can produce more power then a normal one row engine
.....the fuck are you talking about? this engine design is exactly the same as a V-16. The cylinders are in two banks, but the bores are staggered so the engines are shorter, more compact and therefore lighter in weight. This makes it look like the engine has four separate banks, but it doesnt.
i'm affraid that's a vw......
ciumilica 1 week ago
Where the engine is manufactured ?
LUKJ125 1 month ago
@LUKJ125 Germany
teesaccount 2 weeks ago
@teesaccount not all of them ... some are made in Hungary
blackknight3830 5 days ago
Basically 4 vw turbo engines straped together
SmuPet 2 months ago
i accept the 1,000,000+ price now.
xXCHICAGO71Xx 2 months ago
This engineers of this engine are supernatural ones
emercito 2 months ago
Sexy and horny aluminium´s no pin granade engine
emercito 2 months ago
Based on VW VR6 engine technology! VW rules!
AudiophileTubes 3 months ago
One thing is that I'm so wondered why they could make so car sound so quiet??? Unlike the Ferrari or the Lamborghini which had pretty much less horsepower, Can somebody explain it to me, please??? :)
minazmorgul 3 months ago
cant fill the fuel tank!!! :P
vaitheezlanka 3 months ago
3 women watched this
roO7412 3 months ago 2
@roO7412 pues contigo, tu mamá y tu hermana son ahora 6 pues pendejo jajaja
xxfcb88xx 1 month ago
@xxfcb88xx ajajajajajajajajajaj!! Eres tan cagado!! jaja dios mio pobre diablo
roO7412 3 weeks ago
whats the ponit of 4 intake slah outtake valves for faster gas and oxygen ?
baseballman1321 4 months ago
@baseballman1321 what?
j33p74 3 months ago
HOLY SHIT!
HaXardStudios 4 months ago
NOTHING BEATS THE CRAP WHEN IT COMES TO GERMAN ENGINEERING!
pogpog28 5 months ago
One hell of an oil change ha
Josh15935 5 months ago
cade os brasileiros??
rafaelfern 5 months ago
so one crankshaft and 4 camshaft? my first time to see engine like that... also 4 turbo nice video of bugatti mechanism :D
199jensen 5 months ago
@199jensen
Almost every modern V engine has 4 cams as standard.
4 cams or Double DOHC design is old about over 100 years.
2jzgtejza80 5 months ago
@2jzgtejza80
I'm most working on ship engine but never saw car engine that.... thanks info.
199jensen 5 months ago
OMG>>>>>! :O
bsharasexlover 6 months ago
vtec engines are better
gpower88 6 months ago
like this if u came here because of need for speed shit or need for speed hot pursuit
jaxonryder1 6 months ago
@jaxonryder1 i came here cuz of forza mortersport 3 :)
NinjaRuben 6 months ago
one more thing: that engine can develop 1001ps while keeping the reliability because it HAS MORE STRUCTURE THAN A SUPRA ENGINE. when you all will have this in mind? you can have a 1.8L 4-cyl with 1500HP, but it will last only a single fucking pull.
thdmtr 6 months ago
@EventisInnovations truly true.
thdmtr 6 months ago
Bugatti Thailand
ballwaramet 6 months ago
since when is it 'cubic' litre ???
netxposeidon 7 months ago
whos voice is this
nicenow25 8 months ago
waw
rahimi3 8 months ago
People don't understand what it would mean to drive a 1001 hp car, let alone a 3000 hp car on the road.. It cant be done; YOU WOULD CRASH! This car is an amazing technical accomplishment.
odessaboy 8 months ago
AMG and BMW motorsports division are baffled with a question.
Does VW have an edge in engine design?
They prppably do.
Jyrki1964 8 months ago
@Jyrki1964 Then explain to me why McLaren chose to use a BMW V12 in their F1 GT? Hmm, still the worlds fastest NATURALLY ASPIRATED car. BMW makes remarkable engines, Their L6 engines have always been bullet proof, and the V8's and V10's also very powerful. LOL Veyron has 16 cylinders, 4 turbochargers AND variable valve timing and STILL isn't that fastest production car in the world.
328iKid 7 months ago
@328iKid
I am not mocking BMW or AMG motors. I'm just sayin that Volkswagen has proved the world it is capable of making a car that is awesome in any measures of a supercar. Actually all measures. It has air conditioning, good noise reduction, stereos and, lots of other amenities and is easy and comfortable to drive in every day use.
Yes it is built to last and with a warranty. That is amazing.
Jyrki1964 7 months ago
@Jyrki1964
It is not really that hard to tickle 1500 hp from a big engine, but when you drive it a while, It breaks. Veyron engine is made to last. That's why it has at least ten radiators. It's brakes are made to last. etc.. It is a marvellous piece of engineering.
Jyrki1964 7 months ago
@328iKid it's faster than almost any production car...the only one which is faster on acceleration is the SuperSport...when you tell a car is the fastest, you have to consider also the acceleration, not just top speed!! veyron has much faster acceleration than this crapy american piece of junk(ssc ultimate aero)....
konsextus 4 months ago
@konsextus Look up the Koenigsegg Agera R. Wait till they confirm the top speed. Don't be ignorant, sure the SSC is much less advanced in the driving aid and creature comfort areas but it is definitely an impressive car in terms or design, the frame is extremely stiff and it does what the Veyron was basically made for, only slightly better. The Supersport of course is a different story.
328iKid 4 months ago
@328iKid On paper the agera r is a bit slower than the "simple" veyron to 200km/h.. just 2 tenths of a sec...but slower...I also wait for the top speed of agera r. but the thing I know is that the veyron is not just a bit better than the aero...it is a lot better...almost no big car journalist talks about the aero in such good words as for the veyron...veyron is just something from a different planet...when aero just sooo isn't...
konsextus 4 months ago
Man the 3d engine animations in this video are great! Buggati motors deserve much respect regardless if you like the car or not
APEZ94 9 months ago
All this bullshit about it "only" having 1000 horsepower.... This engine is sold with a warranty and is built to last, as well as be drivable in everyday driving situations. You probably could get 4000 horsepower out of a W16 8.0 quad turbo but it probably couldn't be packaged in a reliable everyday car. I'm sure none of you would be complaining it wasn't fast enough if you'd had a ride in one
joetol 9 months ago
well if you just want more cylinders put 2 v12s together and call it a w24! not a hard thing to do but why?! twin turbo v8s make more power than this quad turbo w16!!! just a name for selling this piece of crap!
TheXdmgx7 9 months ago
Is it a FOCK or a QOHC? As in over head cams
suzukiholdenman 10 months ago
The narrator reads everything wrong!
I has really awkward pauses inbetween words lol
revorocks123 10 months ago
16 cylinders and four turbos and only 1001 hp a supra with 6 cylinders and 1 turbo can make 14000hp, this bugatti should have 4000hp
tuugfo 10 months ago
@tuugfo The problem is that the Bugatti Veyron has to last 10 to 20 years, more if properly maintained. The engine's characteristics are meant so that the car can be driven like a normal car. Turbocharging a Supra to 1400 HP will drastically reduce the life of the engine, making it prone to break down. The engine will also be very violent and the turbo lag will be very long, making the car impractical for anything other than racing.
EventisInnovations 10 months ago 40
@EventisInnovations nelson racing engines f-bomb
shebz119125130 9 months ago
@EventisInnovations Yes, but in the meantime, you can buy 140 replacement engines for your Supra. But that wouldn't attract the same women as a Veyron.
And attracting women is what exotic cars are about. God knows it isn't about performance or reliability.
dinicthus 9 months ago
@EventisInnovations The question is if the Enine of the Veyron would last 10 or 20 Years.Consider some Lambos, which lost their life with 50, 60,000 Kilometers or even earlier because of engine faults (or other strange faults). It´s like "a Mercedes it the best what you can get", as it was true 30 years ago; now look at some 7,8 years old S-Classes or E-Classes/Vitos which start to rust or other problems. So for me it has to be proven if a W16 would last as long as a normal engine.
TheMCMXXL2 8 months ago
@TheMCMXXL2
Bugatti reported they have Veyron with 500,000 km on their counter. The engine is still running without a single issue. They are built like an aircraft. You should check Bugatti Veyron Man Made. Each Veyron have 500 km before being shipped to their owners.
Tippotipo 8 months ago
@EventisInnovations
You are so right.
Jyrki1964 7 months ago
@EventisInnovations BullShit..... Underground racing TT Lambos are a perfect example of a STREET car that can be daily driven. Those lambo's are putting out 1500AWHP. If the engine is built correctly and PROPERLY MAINTAINED, then even a 1400+ HP engine can last a long time. The only time you crazy power being made and breaking all the time is when the compression ratio is way high (15:1). Also, 10 to 20 years has nothing to do if the motor only have 200 miles on it witt proper oil changes....
bottlefedtsi 6 months ago
@bottlefedtsi It is funny how you talk smack on cars you can neither own nor afford. Go back to driving your 89 Corolla and delivering pizzas, redneck.
EventisInnovations 6 months ago
@EventisInnovations You get a lot more bang for buck though with a supra. Chances are, you're not getting a Bugatti to get the most comfortable or efficient ride on the streets nor would you take it out to go buy your groceries.
MrXorHomer 5 months ago
@EventisInnovations
But one could buy 40 moded supra for the price of one.
webdesign212 3 months ago
@webdesign212 but 40 modded supras still wudnt be worth one veyron XD
iaevilmonkey 3 months ago
@tuugfo no the bugatti veyron acctually make 3000 HP but 2000 HP dies just to make it to the wheel
TheJamacanman 10 months ago
@TheJamacanman yess the engine has 3000 hp but they reduce it cuz off the heat to 1001
MrMuscleMacho 8 months ago
@MrMuscleMacho
I can believe that. The heat is truly a major problem. Veyron has 10 radiators.
Jyrki1964 8 months ago
@tuugfo F1 Turbo engines in the 70's made 1400hp with just1.5L of displacement and 4 cylinders
logtothebase2 10 months ago
@tuugfo Well, and how long does that supercharged turbo V6 last? And I am not mentioning the consumption.
kriklan49 9 months ago
@tuugfo
Does it last even two 1/4 mile races?
Jyrki1964 7 months ago
What about the crankshaft? Is it forged? Or is it turned?
thanks
IronPump89 10 months ago
@IronPump89 It's forged mate
Such a nice crank, every bit of it is polished!
revorocks123 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
im going crazy
Sepuerto 11 months ago
good video, shame about the blokes voice..sounds like a knob
Davidsasuk 11 months ago
I love this video
cbrownie417 11 months ago
so 2 twin turbo charged V8 engine = EB16.4 engine
MegaReaper999 11 months ago
W is because it is in the shape of a cylinders w shaped
Mr2001hatem 1 year ago
The "nuclear bomb" of engines
driftsilvia16 1 year ago 26
@driftsilvia16 no, the Chuck Norris of engines.
TheFullyOmniscient 6 months ago
Can you plz tell me why its called W 16....i mean in V shaped cylinder block we see a V shape but i dont see a W shape anywhere? HELP!
qfanization 1 year ago
@qfanization cut your W in have and u get VV (V-V ) which is the proper way to name it, go to Wikipedia for the full response on w and vv (v-v) engines that are 16 cylinder.
luigi14444 1 year ago
@luigi14444 look at 2:20 I see a W there.......r u sure thats not the W? btw thanks for the reply...ur point is logical :D
qfanization 1 year ago
@qfanization if you see it more carefully you will see a V out of which \ is a V and the / is also a V because of the cylinder arrangement...
konsextus 4 months ago
When they say magnesium components, they mean mag alloy right? Not pure magnesium?
thekkl 1 year ago
Yeah that's nice, but still nothing beats cubic inches... a blown big block V8 will out torque and hp the complex bugatti engine.
barthoedemaker 1 year ago
2 tons of weight, that's not a sports car. Although the engine is a great achievement.
barthoedemaker 1 year ago
I think this engine can make 1600hp on pump gas. It can have 8 litres and 16 cylinders and 4 turbos, i would like to see this thing tuned to the top.
Chevymonster203 1 year ago
It's a shame they can't take this CGI technology and integrate into HS automotive classes. It doesn't replace getting your hands dirty and actually rebuilding a block, but to be able to remove parts while the engine is reciprocating (with the computer generation) does a helluva lot more than any book can!
rockguitarist4lyfe 1 year ago
This is superbly produced and explains the mechanical design very well
The engine designers have achieved a mechanical masterpiece. well done
ron8197 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
but a french engineer novia jeminge already use w16 yamaha for his car 12 yrs ago
wafi0123 1 year ago
but a frence engineer novia jeminge already use w16 yamaha for his car 12 yrs ago
wafi0123 1 year ago
What would have been the difference if it was a V16 not W16 ?!!
collamolla 1 year ago
@collamolla a long engine
oommggdude 1 year ago
@oommggdude
Thanks !
collamolla 1 year ago
@collamolla no prob haha
oommggdude 1 year ago
@collamolla 2 rows of 8 instead of 4 rows of 4.
drummerjack007 1 year ago
@drummerjack007
Thanks bro =)
collamolla 1 year ago
@collamolla It would have been twice as long to have the same displacement so the car would need a much longer engine bay.
thekkl 1 year ago
love the vid thanks
tonylovesjdmef9 1 year ago
Bugatti reeks of history & quality..
xXEnkeixpressXx 1 year ago
@xXEnkeixpressXx Except that this isn't Bugatti at all. This is Volkswagen using the Bugatti name because they learned from the Phaeton that people pay too much attention to the badge on the car.
thekkl 1 year ago
haha fail "turbo superchargers"
blockinater 1 year ago
@blockinater Not in the slightest, a turbo is a supercharger.
"When power comes from an exhaust gas turbine a supercharger is known as a turbosupercharger – typically referred to simply as a turbocharger."
theweekthatis 1 year ago
@theweekthatis Correct!
morpheus232001 1 year ago
@blockinater Turbosupercharger is actually the correct full name of turbocharger. A turbo is actually a type of supercharger. Have to admit though that they probably only bothered to say the whole name here to make it sound more cool.
thekkl 1 year ago
the grill of the old bugatti is the same as the new one o.o
Aqwert76 1 year ago
@Aqwert76 Which is a good thing!! ;)
convictedSTONNER 1 year ago
HENCE THE PRICE!
nandiito 1 year ago
same concept as VW's VR6. a combo of V-style and inline cylinders. after all, it IS a Volkswagen people!
fgonzales2001 1 year ago
@fgonzales2001 this man speaks the truth, the VR6 is the grandfather of the Veyron's engine.
akaDannylo 1 year ago
@fgonzales2001 yeah true.
barthoedemaker 1 year ago
BEAST!!!!
surferdude4261 1 year ago
ooooooooooh the world is moving fast...
TheDamnKewlTrAnE 1 year ago
this engine has so much more potential, i dont understand how they can only get 1000 hp out of it...
anasamla 1 year ago
@anasamla Because they want it to be efficient and durable and not too noisy and street legal. Without these restrictions it becomes much easier to make 1000hp. If someone was to hotrod one of htese engines, without changing the displacement or setup at all, they could probably make at least 1800hp and if they don't care about street legal then probably more like 4000hp.
thekkl 1 year ago
Where did you get the vid from?
achekyule 1 year ago
lol. and here i was thinking it had twin crank shafts.
kobukankingkona 1 year ago
rotor engine beats this worthless complex and inefficient engine
Dima1415 1 year ago
@Dima1415 Yeah, until it wears out in 100,000 kms and has to be rebuilt. Rotary engines are a nice idea, but they just don't last. Plus they run dirty and will eventually be unable to meet emission standards.
Toromont123 1 year ago
@Dima1415 id hardly call the engine worthless...im sure these master engineers thought of a rotary engine,obviously it diddnt meet the standards of the bugatti.Perhaps it wouldnt be able to handle everything else they did to the bugatti?
TheSoundzUK 1 year ago
Why not build a rotary engine? For a bugatti veyron 1001hp 16 cylinder engine, an equivalent rotor engine (1001hp) would be more efficient and much better...
Dima1415 1 year ago
I like how he says Veyro'n. .. with the accent on the O..
damianomigani 1 year ago
lol@ cubic liters
starfltcdrjr 1 year ago
turbosuperchargers? wtf
jcremeans11 1 year ago
@jcremeans11 thats what theyre called but every one just says turbos cuz its easier lol
PetrolDemon 1 year ago
must be a real bitch servicing those cylinder heads...
zx6rtt 1 year ago
@zx6rtt how about cleaning the valves 1 by 1 by hand...
weetnietgeen 1 year ago
2:42 Did he say 8 cubic litres? WTF is a cubic LITRE? I get cubic centimetres or just litres, but cubic litres!
fnorgen 1 year ago
@fnorgen as opposed to a square litre or a linear litre ;)
TheMarkus248 1 year ago
its impossible to build a 3000hp engine and get it to do full power continually for years....W16, W20 , 30 cylinder or not.
Unless you use a turbine engine, which is far simpler, far more efficient, more eco friendly,and gets 3000hp from the engine size of roughly the mclaren f1s...
The next step forward in more powerful engines in cars is a turbine, not pistons.
ASSHOLELA 1 year ago
@ASSHOLELA Turbine engines don't idle very well compared with a piston engine, so you'd end up using more fuel in normal traffic conditions with a turbine engine.
cookiehead2 1 year ago
@cookiehead2
thats not something id worry about coz the veyron itself is not very fuel efficient either.
ASSHOLELA 1 year ago
@ASSHOLELA , 10 miles per gallon on city, and 12 miles on highway :D
spearkill 1 year ago
i was arguing with a friend of mine he was saying that to get the 16 cylinders they put two v8s side by side but i didnt think it was possible or at least enginerable... my question now, is it possible two make such an engine, if so it would probly take one hell of a transmision, am i right?
xXxDylan8milkxXx 1 year ago
@xXxDylan8milkxXx No transmission was in production that could take it and keep taking it for years so they had to commission one to be engineered specifically for the Veyron's drivetrain.
thekkl 1 year ago
mamma mia a 16 pistoni,,ke mostro di macchina......:)
thesony88 1 year ago
рекламировать научились,чо
DeathFantazy 1 year ago
that's one hell of an engine.
Salutatorium 1 year ago
es un exelente video el motor es la raja es muy lindo
hugoautomotrtiz 1 year ago
I think i just saw the best movie on Youtube.... Great video!!! :D
yawn91 1 year ago
BEAST! Thats all i gotta say. Just BEAST!
isaiasf93 1 year ago
I don't even wanna commend on stupid reactions here, I'm a master engine builder. You CANT compare this with a V8. Bugatti's purpose is to build a " life worthy " car that can do 400 km/h until it goes to the scrapyard. You can't compare this high tech euro stuff to american junk. Get a life.
barthoedemaker 1 year ago
1000hp 16 cyl. engine does sound cool but its not very impressive. cadillac made a 1000hp v16 and it was NA. it could get 20mpg easily too, it just wasnt put into production.
pzpepsi 1 year ago
@pzpepsi
20 mpg for Callidac Sixteen was never proved, it is only a claim. Its engine is huge and longer: 11.3L compared to 8.0L Quad-Turbo W16 engine from Veyron. Be in mind Cadillac Sixteen is a limousine not a luxury sport car.
Tippotipo 1 year ago
whatever nig
pzpepsi 1 year ago
pathetic, thats only 1hp per cubic inch, with 4 turbos!!! that thing better be able to run non stop because there is nothing high performance about that engine. The engines in Ferrari's are nearly 2hp per cubic inch from the factory. No wonder this thing weighs so much, the engine is a massive waste of weight. i would give up a bit of reliability for performance anyday. Its not like this car is a daily driver.
JulsJunior 2 years ago
Only a few races, this thing needs to last a lifetime. No need to tell me what F1 is. But it is not in comparisation with the Bugattie engine. totally differemt purpose.
barthoedemaker 2 years ago
This 16 cylinder is built to last and put out a reliable 1000 hp. Can't say that of a max tuned 6 cylinder or V8 can ya?
barthoedemaker 2 years ago
@barthoedemaker ever hear of an f1 race!?
these v8s can put out 10000rpm for hours straight. and can last more than 20 minutes at full throttle. those engines engineered are virtually perfect. some of the clearances do not exceed .00001 and the buggati are still production line built where all of the parts come from a pre-fabricated set. instead of parts engineered and fabricated for that one engine only.
halosux4life 2 years ago
@halosux4life The engine in the Bugatti Veyron is capable of sustaining 1001 HP FAR LONGER than some race car engine can. Think in HOURS to understand this concept. You can take any other race car engine that makes this power and they will fail long before this engine fails if you hold them 1001HP continuously.
EETechs 1 year ago
the veyron might be strong enough to handle it but it over-heats medium and high rpm really quick.
pzpepsi 1 year ago
Comment removed
EETechs 1 year ago
Comment removed
EETechs 1 year ago
if this thing were maxed tuned it would only last as long as a maxed tuned v-6 or v-8. Probably shorter because it has more things to go wrong. the rotating mass is staggering. Maxed tuned v-8 with 4 turbos could make a couple thousand horse on far less desplacement. it would push 3-4 hp/cu. in. whereas this bugatti engine is only a mere 1hp/cubic inch. something that high performance flat head motors can easily surpass.
JulsJunior 2 years ago
juls yes your right. you can squeeze hp out of anything strong enough. What your forgetting is the behavior of this motor. They designed it to have faultless power. You stamp, you get a linear power curve. no lag, all torque. smooth and comfortable but super fast. The car is an engineering showcase which broke new ground. Not a numbers chaser. top speed is limited. It did everything without fault. Speed, luxury, safety, comfort, reliability and ease of use. No super hp v8 will be easy to drive.
slickstrings 1 year ago
@slickstrings if they were really worried about the no lag part why didn't they put a supercharger on it instead? Also, what new ground did it break? the engine is nothing but unique and it has huge displacement. chassis controls (ride height and auto wing/air brake) are nothing new. The only thing that stands out on this car is the price tag and the engine displacement.
JulsJunior 1 year ago
@slickstrings my bad, idk what i was looking at but i was thinking this was almost 1000cubic inch, it is just short of 500, which makes it a little cooler but still not that neat for all the turbos. It is far from high performance by any standard nonetheless.
JulsJunior 1 year ago
@JulsJunior you need to define hi performance. If high performance means huge hp for its capacity, then perhaps not. But in terms of relevance, it is extremely high performance. Im sure if the engineers wanted they could boost it up and get 3000 hp out of this engine. But this car is actually restrained to perform in a very particular way. Its not a track car. More hp in this car would be like wanting concorde to perform like a fighter jet. Its not intended to.
slickstrings 1 year ago
@slickstrings i would liken high performance to density, you don't say a huge piece of aluminum is dense, you say its heavy. Tungsten or Iridium would be dense. However I have my doubts they could get 3000hp out of it. Perhaps with some hefty modifications, I think the W16 would look fragile once you started making it really run. You would have to build it more like diesel and keep the RPM down. I think the crank would be first to break, thats alot to ask out of one crank.
JulsJunior 1 year ago
@JulsJunior your still calling it bad for something it never intended to be. If they wanted 3000hp out of this motor, they would have designed it to do so. Thats the whole point and people seem to miss that. Ive never heard one person who has actually driven it say, gee i wish it had more power. Its not built for lap times or dyno bragging rights. Its a demonstration of technical wonders. A car that pushed boundaries. they arnt even selling it for profit.
slickstrings 1 year ago
@JulsJunior i agree. on top gear, they said that at full throttle, the motor would self-destruct in around 25 minutes. fortunatly, it will run out of fuel in 15 minutes!
the motors 1000hp is not a 1st. but its one of the 1st 1000hp cars that can be driven on the street with comfort!
999benhonda 1 year ago
@JulsJunior
Maxed out, better get materials that candles the heat. When it was tested for the first time, it nearly destroyed the building because the exhausts burned. Lets not forget that engine is built for torque rather than horsepower.
Tippotipo 1 year ago
@Tippotipo anything with 1000 cubic inch is going to have gobs of torque. Best I can see is that it makes pretty close to 1000ft-lbs of torque as well, which is also pathetic. A good turbo charged engine (top end) should make around 5 ft-lbs of torque per cubic inch, as you can see this doesn't even beat a mild running naturally aspirated engine. The Enzo makes 1.35 ft-lbs per cubic inch naturally aspirated and it is built for hp (1.32 hp per cubic inch). Your argument holds no weight.
JulsJunior 1 year ago
@Tippotipo my bad, idk what i was looking at but i was thinking this was almost 1000cubic inch, it is just short of 500. still that is only equivalent to a well tuned naturally aspirated motor. a v-12 or v-16 would have similar reliability for an engine of this order.
JulsJunior 1 year ago
you obviously dont know about v8. i've seen 2500hp TT big block v8s that get tuned down to 1000hp just to be reliable. and can get back to 2500hp with just a few switch flips for the drag strip. its been that way for a while, the fastest cars are always gonna have v8s in them
pzpepsi 1 year ago
the thing now is, now everyone is trying to get be like bugatti and become a masterpiece. I hear zonda want a car that will do 278PMH? and i have a feeling more will look at how Bugatti did it and add their touch to it..but initially looking at bugatti's
SidneyXda 2 years ago
wow! thanks for this vid man! i really love the way it showed the engine and its W shape 16 cylinder. Whats the name of this program?
SidneyXda 2 years ago
yeah haha the veyrons a fucking ship meant for dominating the long roads f1 is a tottally different story no comaprence
artilistic 2 years ago
the buggati has a slow launch cuz of its weight but when it reaches a certain speed it would shit on the car badly, so consider ur self lucky in the launch but lucky just for a few seconds .
Rsx0typeS 2 years ago
Comment removed
Ycondaman 2 years ago
interesting would bugatti on 1\4 mile race line be faster than F1 car?
jarejeremap 2 years ago
the longer the race goes on... the better the bugatti will do. the distance gives the car the chance to giddyup all of its horsepower.
iami8yrsold 2 years ago
NO
F1 is lighter
Surferniels 2 years ago
i thought the cylinders would be one row vrtical and the other 2 diagonal. man i'm stupid.
yanzodadon 2 years ago 11
this is a W engine design in which 2 engines are connected in cross positions and deliver horsepower to crank in cross this can produce more power then a normal one row engine
xceptionel 2 years ago 4
@xceptionel
.....the fuck are you talking about? this engine design is exactly the same as a V-16. The cylinders are in two banks, but the bores are staggered so the engines are shorter, more compact and therefore lighter in weight. This makes it look like the engine has four separate banks, but it doesnt.
widowmaker95123 1 year ago
@yanzodadon me too
thefrank9413 1 year ago
great vid
asarvo09 2 years ago 10