Bases 6 Controlled Remote Viewing Briefing By Paul O'Connor

[sl8734]

I looked up the procedures they used to conduct the CRV experiments and found out that the training was not done double-blind, meaning the interviewer knows the target, and was supposed to give "immediate feedback" to the remote viewer. That sounds like leaking information to the viewer to me. Can anybody refute this?

[IGCentertainmentca]

project star gate i'll have to look that one up :)

[mrdrumsauce]

very nice, thanks for posting!

[isleofyew1]

What a load of horse shit. Weak minded people believe all these conjectures and lies.

[Greenhornet270]

Heavy subject...GREAT Post.....

[cyberduke23]

Keep up the good work!

[enjoixander]

Remote viewers victimized until they drop from the sky weak and emptied out of every spiritual possesion we have. Your accuracy will not prevent your kidnapping! And your kidnappings are often a means to force you to see! Who is the enemy? You don't get paid and you are continually abused. The handlers can all burn in HELL!

[Downbeatoff]

45:10 where he talks about the crashed craft on the moon... there's a movie coming out about that.

[alexeevic]

Biggest load of shit in the universe!

[TheGambler666]

great presentation thx

[rsouthern]

all government projects have one goal. To preserve itself and to destroy its enemies. The information received by the public is nothing but falsified information including truth and facts to confuse and misguide the general public. The world governments and unions are at war with each other and always have been until their is only one and its citizens will be sacrificed killed for the benefit.

[Tzimnewman3]

Most people at a car accident tend to give the same account and that's why Police take statements. Otherwise a Court would never be able to trial a case since the evidence would contradict itself.

[flowerbower]

@Tzimnewman3 That is generally untrue. I used to work on aviation accident investigation, which included the correlation of eye-witness statements. In the case of one particular crash (at an air-show), the 300 or so statements all disagreed (sometimes spectacularly) and none of them agreed with some cine film which later turned up.

Many psychological studies have also shown that humans make very bad eye-witnesses. Have you seen the gorilla/basketball video?

[Greenhornet270]

great posts...i am wondering if remote viewing has gone deeply black into the depths of the cia ?

[flowerbower]

@Greenhornet270 Don't you mean 'deeply BACK'? The CIA (never very bright and often failing to spot damaging spies in their midst) were conned into believing in RV by Harold Puthoff in the 70s, shortly after the magician Uri Geller fooled incompetent scientists with his age-old mentalism tricks.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower LOL. You dick.

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Tell me how Derren Brown how he does his tricks and I shall believe that the so-called researchers in this field are capable of spotting trickery.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower lol - he's a psyop. Just b/c he TELLS you repeatedly & plausibly over & over again (a technique known as 'psychic driving' ironically enough) that EVERYTHING he does is mere trickery doesn't make it so. The real 'con-fidence' trick is broadcasting to millions & having most believe against all logic that he's a stage act using smoke n mirrors lol. The U.S. has its own equivalents of Brown 'approved' at this time to discredit human potential. Use yr critical faculties if you have any.

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 So, you are claiming that he is really psychic, but pretending to be a mere conjuror. You know, that is exactly what Sir Arthur Conan Doyle said about Houdini! It is saddening how every generation makes the same mistakes, isn't it? But, hey, people are still patenting a type of perpetual motion machine which was already being laughed at 200 years ago. And just look at the 'energy from magnets' nutters on YouTube. You are not alone.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower You laugh at perpetual motion machines and magnetic energy but we know that anti-gravity technology requires their proper application. These are the ppl tinkering about in Matrix Level One -it's preposterous to judge the efficacy of a thing by the failed attempts of amateurs! You remind me of the religionists poring over ancient texts, one side convinced that it's all to be taken literally, the other side that it's all allegory, neither side realising that there are elements of both

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Except that one side has real evidence, which can be replicated anytime anywhere, given the correct apparatus and the ability to use it. The others just prattle ... don't you?

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower No - yr wrong b/c as in quantum physics where a similar principle applies, the very creation of laboratory (test) conditions will inevitably nullify results that would've occured without them - again, that's an empirical fact; has something to do with the removal of variables applying in the real world that don't come into effect in an artificially constructed environment, so yahboo sucks to you sunshine lol

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Don't attempt to lecture me on the basis of second-hand ideas that you have got out of the Boys' Big Book of Science. Interaction with measuring instruments is a universal phenomenon and is not restricted to quantum mechanics. But you wouldn't know that, because it is not 'spooky' enough for the purposes of science journalists and writers. No physicist finds QM spooky. That's a mere layman's assessment of counter-intuition or paradox.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower No, i developed those ideas myself actually & tutored Niels Bohr & David Bohm et al in them.."second hand ideas" ? Wha...? You cretin! LOL.As for physicists not finding it 'spooky', u clearly have no grounding WHATSOEVER in the history or current climate of this discipline & yet here you are pretentiously refering to a 'layman's assessment' thereof inferring that yr an expert while recklessly abandoning to my scorn yr demonstrative ignorance on EVEN THE RUDIMENTS OF ITS FOUNDATIONS

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower Allow me to turn the tables. YOU tell ME how he does his "tricks". Take the recent show he did over in the U.S. where he presents himself as this, that and the other to genuine this, thats' and others'. How do you - if you're going to have a decent fist at answering the question - propose that he smirkingly re-presented the images in the minds of the psychics in the other room (for example)?

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Why? I have friends in the Magic Circle, so I know that they are tricks (I am myself close to mastering his 'pick-a-card' stunt using an invisible deck). I would also be honour-bound not to tell you even if I knew. One thing is certain with Brown: he is a master of misdirection so, no matter how you think he might be doing it, the real method will be 'right out of left field'. I can tell you that the explanations of all magic tricks tend to be depressingly banal. 

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower Honour bound not to tell, yes, that's very convenient lol. Better than answering "i d/k" b/c it references secret knowledge not available to others. You'll recall that i implied that MOST of the things he does ARE mere conjuring tricks but it doesn't necessarily ensue that EVERYTHING he does is a trick. Yes, i've seen Penn & Teller and the explanations for most tricks ARE "depressingly banal" but using Ockam's Razor some of the results Brown attains are beyond the scope of trickery.

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Yeah, right: he has super-powers but still needs to earn a living like everybody else (or, at least, like everyone else in showbiz). Reminds me of what happens when one asks psychics why they don't just foretell the lottery numbers instead of working: the usual excuse is that their prophecies don't work for themselves. It is a little harder to fathom why they don't simply pair-up and predict for each other.

This entire discussion is moronic.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower the reason they don't predict the lottery numbers is b/c there's too much emotional interference, a veritable babble of it surrounding the event....you have a very simplistic mindset: you're now resorting to a strawman so you can knock it down lol but it just doesn't wash as psychic phenomena exists as a matter of fact and record so if the discussion IS moronic, then only from yr end. Again, just b/c end-of-the-pier Gypsy Rose Lee frauds exist doesn't mean genuine psychics don't

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 So, it is the usual excuse: psychic demonstrations don't work until any sort of scientific experimental control is removed and everybody is metaphorically looking the other way. Reminds me of when Uri Geller met Richard Feynman. Feynman pursued Geller and his fork around an appartment until Geller finally managed to bend it under the cover of washing his hands. Suddenly, Feynman's 'negative vibes' did not matter any more. How spooky.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower given yr less-than-honest track record i can't claim to 'know' anything about that incident with my 2nd fav pop sci writer even tho you've sketched out what allegedly happened b/c having caught you out several times already i'm now wise to yr blatant sleight-of-hand: forgive me if i remain skeptical lol. I've not made up my mind about the spoon bending but if he can - under laboratory conditions- 'fool' a bunch of PhDs at SRI it can't be such a bad "trick" after all, now can it lol?

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower "earn a living"? He doesn't need to earn a living at all, he's a millionaire several times over. Financial motivation isn't the only one, there's fame, pleasure etc....what a lame argument!

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Is there no end to your naivety? Expenses always rise to meet income. Tom Cruise has far more money and fame than Brown, but he keeps working (unfortunately). OTOH, perhaps he has to work to keep the scientologists going.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower "expenses always rise to meet income" LOL. Who are u trying to kid sunshine? Despite my previous st/ment of fact, do u still not ustand that most top footballers & film & TV stars & singers/musicians come to depend on the adulation of their audience & fans & that some take great pride & pleasure in their own skills & enjoy practicing them - doing so as often & for as long as they can? AGAIN, by imagining as you do, that it's all about the money YOU're the naive one, not me.

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Oh yes, I had forgotten all of those footballers from impoverished backgrounds who, upon being catapulted into the million-a-year bracket, continue to live with their parents, never buy a fancy car or attract the attention of models. I am beginning to see the problem: you live on another planet.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower LOL. If that's you're final word in response to my refutations then we'll leave it there i think. Job's a good 'un. Ciao (;-D

[TheGambler666]

*your

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 OK, here is one of his old tricks (which no longer works very well so nobody will mind its disclosure). Brown used to pick on random strangers, and ask them to take coins out of their pocket. He would choose one from a long distance away, and have them check the date before holding it tightly to their forehead. He would then tell them the date. He was over 90% correct. Try applying Occam's razor; it will give you the best solution immediately.

Or do you give up?

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower imprint?

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 Much simpler. Have you noticed how he often invites more subjects than he uses? In the coin trick, he would spot someone who had at least one 10 pence coin in their possession. He would choose that person and that coin for the trick.

Still not got it? Knowledge really is power! In this case, it was the knowledge that nearly all 10p coins in circulation at that time bore the same date (1982)! How's that for depressingly banal?

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower LOL. I think i need to remind you of my initial acknowledgement that MOST of the things performed by Brown are indeed conjuring tricks -that really ought've pre-empted this rather shallow attempt on yr part at cheap pointscoring

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 The fact that you think that any of his tricks are truly psychic marks you out as a sucker. May i remind you of my point about Doyle and Houdini. Some 40 years ago, Uri Geller was where Brown is now, and Geller did claim to be 100% psychic. But Geller's tricks have all been duplicated, or bettered. Don't be so naieve.

[TheGambler666]

@flowerbower Whoever "duplicated and bettered" Geller's "tricks" will be multi-millionaires then, b/c he's a proven psychic, the majority of whose wealth derives from oil drilling and gold prospecting companies and the like who've employed him time and time again for his ability to locate 'hotspots' pre-C-ALS. Are you so... naive...as to imagine that these hardnosed mercenary wideboys employ phoneys n fakes and pay them truckloads of cash? Don't be so...only one E in...'naive' (;-D

[flowerbower]

@TheGambler666 My own personal favourite trick is to have someone pick a small cloud. I then 'focus my mental energies on it', and make it disappear. I got that trick from a typical highstreet magic book for amateurs but, 60 years ago, it made someone front-page news and he was discussed at length in the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. Brown's current tricks will eventually become just as old-hat and well-known as that one.

[psychicphenomena]

Is the use of the term Controlled Remote Viewing  not merely a way of distancing this "set of protocols" from psychic abilities?

[megawatts1066]

We have 18 senses, not just 5, so one needs to playu witha full deck, before using old terms, which are derived from a lack of understanding of who we are in the first place.

Psychics are spontaneous "RVs" The whole point of this presentation is that it is Controlled.

[patpayne911]

Excellent Info !!! Thank You!!

[palecapulet]

56:10: what happened? mic battery died?

[sarahbird121]

@palecapulet Yes. It was a minor technical glitch.

[megawatts1066]

Ran out of tape, and had to switch to a different camera.

[TobiasBlass]

excellent vid - thanks for uploading!

[palecapulet]

1:00: (1 hour in) Did he just say that the military didn't develop the RV protocols?

[sarahbird121]

@palecapulet No, I said that 'remote viewing' is used to describe a lot of OBE and psychic clairvoyance, whereas the term for the military-developed protocols of 'Controlled Remote Viewing' is not. Hope that clarifies, and thanks fo r the question. Paul

[duffland09]

After checking out your stuff... It looks like you're the retard...UFO LOL!!!!

[the26thhour]

To b Psychically gifted & Spiritual gifted r 2 different things entirely

I could spend the rest of my life trying to explain the difference but simply,Psychic Awareness is to know 1's intimate connection to 1's multidimensional range of Physicality while Spiritual Awareness is to know 1's intimate connection to the root of all within Infinite Omnipotence, i.e.Consciousness,cause Spirit is the underline factor to Infinity while Physicality is only part there of & virtually all of it begins & ends

[the26thhour]

Dude,I appreciate u putting this vid up but u can go on all day about the difference between the physical attributes of "controlled remote viewing" & the physical attributes under the umbrella of psychic ability but everything u just described in ur premise of what controlled remote viewing is,other than the fact that a bunch of Scientists bothered to test it,is innate psychic ability that all human & indeed all life has always possessed

The only new knowledge,is that which was forgotten

5tars

[CanadianPatriot1973]

thank you

[algildea]

excellent thank you

[butlincat]

excellant - the "ship" at 48 m 37 sec is here - /watch?v=Y3X5oucqQe4

[Didyouknowthisstuff]

Awesome ,thanks for spreading this.

[MeDappaDonn]

great vid!