Added: 1 year ago
From: sgentlemanjack112
Views: 35,255
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (335)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I couldn't care less whether Wikileaks is CIA or not. I am only interested in what he leaks. Is it valid? Is it useful intel? That's what matters.

  • ANONYMOUS EXPOSED

    IN MORE THAN 300 PHOTOS

    SEARCH IN FACEBOOK:

    The Zeitgeist Skeptic Photo Archive

  • The moment I read about Assange saying 911 was not an inside job, I knew the fucker was an agent. Also WHY WOULD THE BIAS "government" controlled MEDIA show him on tv everyday exposing "secret u.s. archives" ? Think about it. Real Whistle blowers "commit suicide" or "disappear".

  • The internet has been making people smart. Authority hates smart sheeple. WikiLeaks had to be a Gov. headed operation, spreading misinformation and red herrings to keep the folks running in circles chasing bullshit. Nothing more than a smokescreen. Everyone know about the Bohemian Club's "Satanic Owl Rituals",. They were set up and purposely leaked make people think they were Religious nutfuckers. 9/11 was a US job and WTC7 HAD to come down. It held all the papertrails. NWO is coming.

  • i've said it in one of my video's before, but this whole wikileaks thing is going to cause the bill that is about to pass through congress causing our internet freedom..it's called a false flag op.. because of wikileaks soon we will no be able to download, or simply browse certain (harmless) websites anymore.. wake up people

  • @TheNWOtruth note to self causing=taking

  • no America is betraying America

  • K if wikileaks was part of the CIA why would the CIA be trying to shut them down?

  • @meg5730 Think critically. Why would the NY times promote wikileaks endlessly?

  • @meg5730 errrmm think about it.....it gives the propaganda credibility!

  • @meg5730 they want to shut down the internet.. haven't you seen the news about a new internet law? something about all the pages that hasn't copyright it will be shooted down

  • @meg5730

    best way to remove suspicion of your involvement = attack the thing your involved in publicly while supporting it privately.

  • Excellent vid thank you. Not going to conclude but wikileaks indeed seemed weird. The low level "embarrassment" and actual content and where it points is absolutely consistent with a CIA type psyops campaign.

  • When people claim a lot of these cables expose nothing shocking or ground breaking, it's just that it isn't deemed NewsWorthy. A skirmish where a civilian or two gets killed in the cross fire won't even get a mention in the papers/TV news cycle; but it's going on more often than we'd like to think, innocent people being killed in wars, carried out in the names of so-called Developed Nations.

    There are just wars. This isn't one of them anymore.

  • true shit

  • Hahhahaha youd be suprised what fits on a translfashcard 16 gig lmao months and months off recordings on a card thats the size off your pinky nail lmao.

    In documents its mindblowing

  • Like, what is a "humane" war? It is a scam people. And Wikileaks, transparency and "truthism" is such an effective tool, that the Republican party is using the same theme to promote their campaign... Doesn't anyone else see this? "Truthism" has become the slogan of right-wingers? How long are people going to fall for this? What have they done for you, besides accept your votes and donations? Has the world gotten any closer to peace or justice?

  • He is a fraud! His "information" is always something that has been told and told again... People just don't pay attention or read more than a headline. All of a sudden people act sooo surprised to hear about corrupt banks and war crimes. Had they read a book, they might know war crimes have been a necessity to our position in all of our wars. The CIA smuggling opium in body bags during nam...etc etc etc.

  • Assange is an obvious fraud.  Creepy looking thing too

  • @anastasia2657 nice argumentation there smartypants..just throw some allegations around with nothing to back it up

  • @anastasia2657 nice argumentation there smartypants..just throw some allegations around with nothing to back it up

  • if we ARE going to machine gun and bomb innocent people to death, steal their oil and sell their opium yes, it might as well you know, be humain....

    Retard Assange.

  • Assange, another product of MK:ULTRA

  • @EdBinx no.. Fail.

  • @MuseFromGallifrey yeah and you should know, WANKSTAIN

  • I don't say you aren't right, but is it realy the truth? Must of this not press released stories are based on speculation, not facts. If you're close to the real facts, then your life expectancy drops dramaticly. Just live you're life easy, don't listen to all press releases, don't buy everthing thats popular, don't enlist in the millitary, that almost solves all conspiracy theories. And if you find that life is to costly, get a crowd, and say we don't work anymore if you don't drop prices :D

  • @0cache Who is he then? The official story is horseshit.

  • @falsehopehero @0cache called people who believe Assange to be shilling which He is 100% fucking twits So You already know what He is about.

  • Please. Assange has been an ASIO agent since the 90s.

  • Gee I don't know, I'm just not getting Webster on this one. Wikileaks are most likely no different to any other "credible" reporters, they report. Why is there a need for them to be anti- or pro-anything, so long as they report the truth? Being pro- anti- is what gets the truth mired, because you are then trying to report "A Version" of the truth that "You" want to tell, not the "True" version that you should tell.

  • It has been said that there's 90% truth in every lie, which seems to hold true. Allot of the people here have huge trust issues; and for the most part, I don't blame them. Most of us are just trying to get at the truth the best way we can, but balance is important. Without balance this shit will end up ruling your life and the quality of it. We cannot fight every war but sadly we cannot avoid them all either. Stay strong and fight for peace truth freedom and respect.

  • WikiLeaks is an ZIONIST op , not CIA!!

  • Oh dear, the conspiracy inside the anti-conspiracy... Why not the conspiracy inside the anti-anti-conspiracy? I'm having a headache... Of course we have to be careful. And a partial truth is sometimes more dangerous than a lie... But F***, the bottom line of all this is STOP THE WAR (everywhere). End of story.

  • @OckhamSsword Lol, Like some super messed up version of Inception? I agree, end the wars, its insane what we are doing to each other. Its like the whole world is in the grips of panic.

  • I've really tossed the 9/ 11 thing around in my head. The core things that make me a truther are: building #7, the presence of super thermite and the profit motive. The 9/11 commission report didn't address these issues, publications like popular mechanics didn't address them. Just look at the footage of tower 7 for yourself, it is a demo. I almost wish that I didn't know the truth about 9/11 because then I wouldn't be afraid all the time.

  • Another thing clearly show how fraudulent they are..

    is that USA blocks wikileaks website from america ISPs in

    North america.... but yet their "leaks" are released non stop.. in the new york times.. and other major american news paper..which they have control.. you have no problems to read all their crap. if they really were really a major security problem for USA or european union as Obama and other politicians says their organization will have been shut down already and all in jail .

  • What's really interesting is that this stuff is no more than an ad hominem attack on Assange. I'm happy to listen to "evidence" but once I hear repeated attacks on a person's character I start to worry about the motives and credibility of the attacker. I see nothing odd about Assange's demeanor maybe Tarpley doesn't get around as much as he should. As far as the LSD is concerned all I can say is "so what?" millions have used it and are better for it.

  • What I found strange was the timing of the Pakistani leaks. The flack they got from Indian the UK & US, just after the alleged assignation of Bin Laden. It was a double hit against Pakistan & it also help to justify the drone attacks as well as the Osama Bin fiasco. I think China twigged on quick. I am still leaving an open mind, for the time being, all the best.

  • Wonders shall never end, just a second ago i called julian assange a HERO, well i stand corrected and say, you cant trust or believe anyone, question EVERYTHING & EVERYONE.

    question your job (dream/slavery?), your food (poison/healthy?) i mean everything.

    God bless

  • @1990banks your so correct, i thought he was a hero to...but now i think about it, its so true. you cant trust anyone...especially if they are "former cia". the government is corrupt and lieees.

  • If Wiki Leaks was real, it would have been all over 9/11, but not one article! What a joke. You even see shills on here who quote this to convince people of their ridiculous propaganda! It's not too hard to figure out that anyone who finds 9/11 Truth 'annoying' is not to be trusted.

  • Julian Assange is on of the biggest LIARS ever to come out of the CIA. Wake up sheeple.... NO ONE EVER could EVER EVER EVER have the ability to obtain and release over 250,000 "top secret" cables !!!!!! I cant believe the world fell for this bullsh** !!!! He supposedley wants to expose the truth but he calls people who research 9/11 "annoying" ????? Right......... F*** you "Ass"ange.... you CIA F***... 9/11 was an inside job and anyone with half a brain knows it.

  • @Construuct ...yeah.. wikileaks are full fake...

    They first release tons and tons of minor facts here or there.. but the BIG things

    they cover up.. either they are being used.. by CIA or they are on their payroll of some other agency. If USA was really worried about them.. they will have been in jail already.. but they are allowed to freely talk.. wich shows how much they care of wikileaks.

  • @Vann7 "Full fake" ? What language are you attempting to murder ? All you've done is to repeat what's said in the video. EVIDENCE is what's required, not the mindless parroting of what somebody else has said.

    Assange may well be what's claimed but you won't change anyone's mind with this drivel.

  • @Construuct YEAH AND THESE ARE THE BASTARDS THAT KILLED ELVIS. 

  • @Construuct aint that the truth, what a scumbag !!

  • @Construuct You curse a lot, but the core of your statemant is absolutely true. Maybe you should try to speak a little less cursing to be taking more seriously. It is a pity if such opinions would not be read because of faul language...

  • @Construuct assange doesn`t pursue any information or informants. he publish what people, whistleblowers.....give to him. people that for example, can not stand the atrocities usa have done in iraq killing millions of people there, whom 90% are normal innocent men, women and children in the pursuit of oilmoney and blood after 9/11. assange is the only media that is truly reliable that i know of. all the rest cnn, fox etc, including the british bbc are propaganda for the power. assange are a hero

  • @Construuct

    Well considering that the government classifies upwards of 16 million documents a year top secret and there are something like several hundred thousand private contractors working for the government, it would not be as hard as you think to get that many documents.

  • @Construuct If my memory serves me correctly, the cables were simply classified, not "top secret".

  • @Construuct what ever you say OFFICER

    =|

  • This video is very strange, this person has to be a total idiot. Nothing he says makes any sense. I don't think this idiot understands the importance of freedom of information.

  • @BikeRanger100 Whose truth? Stuff is leaked, he publishes this and that. Very controlled.

  • Yes, Wikileaks is controlled opposition...MOST of the so-called "Truth" movement is controlled opposition.

    Wikileaks is a CIA/MOSSAD operation...a USZOG operation.

  • bloodless? emotionless? wtf are you talking about? You sound like an idiot!

  • People please use your critical thinking skills and don’t be so quick to follow this guy like sheeple, they mainstream media has shoved Julian Assange right in our faces. Why would they give a “truther” so much publicity?

    Please question more. Don’t support Wikileaks, don’t support Zionism and another war.

  • @99N92 Are you fucking stupid? Do you follow every conspiracy theory that hits your web browser?

  • @GoodEvenings You idiot! Have you even read what Wikileaks "reveals"??? I use common sense... I don't follow Julian Assange like a sheep just becaus the media portrays him as a "hero" or "freedom fighter"

  • Ironic how many of the WikiLeaks supporters are anti-war…. WikiLeaks is clearly promoting war…it is promoting chaos. Don’t fall for it.

    Julian Assange is no hero to the oppressed people. Israel is behind WikiLeaks, Benjamin Netanyahu supports him.

  • @99N92 Are you insane, where did you get your facts, from a toilet bowl.

  • that guys describeing alex jones 

  • Funny watching a vid the other day they were saying that destablisation of pakisatan was about preventing Iran and China using the territory to run an oil pipeline through.

  • The Chinese and Russians must already have the information WL has released. Maybe it is some sort of disinformation operation.

  • Assange was part of ASIO (Australian intelligence), and listed in a terrorism committee advisory submissions list, no less! Google asio terror bill appendix b , and click the pdf (Appendix B: List of Submissions) that comes up. It's the official government site, so not a con. There he is, then: 154. Mr Julian Assange, President, Australian Institute for Collaborative Research.

  • @fledermaus81 not anymore.

  • EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!

    come on....

  • @sgentlemanjack112 Russian Television is CIA-run too.

  • @archdukemaximilian What evidence do you have to support this?

  • @sgentlemanjack112 Wikileaks Work Is real, And Yes the Govs will Try, But meh they dont have the power or the know how to Take it DOWN

  • @surrenderyourflesh absolutly TRUE!!! its sooo hillarious to say Wikileaks is a CIA thing....oh god people get a life and stop putting up these insane theories

  • I don't understand WikiLeaks, I downloaded a lot of torrent files, I simply found nothing special, and when I saw "Italy child porn" ooo-hoo... :D

  • @iPlayWithPhysics torrent anon hbgary emails

  • I'm glad people are beginning to wake up to the fact Wikileaks is 100% controlled opposition. I think it has already stepped into the realms of farce, in the way that is all over mainstream mass media (another 100% global elite controlled "institution") via revelations of absolutely nothing. We need to stop Wikileaks, not the Internet. Of course "they" want you to think Internet is dangerous because of Wikileaks. Absolute fucking farcical bullshit.

  • I have felt this in my gut from the beginning..........if all main media outlets are pushing and marketing something simultaneously..you know it`s bullshit. !

  • wikkie is part of the global agenda. this will trigger the Fear factor and people say YEAA lets restrict the internet. just the same like 9/11 and all the securety and wars.

    people have to start looking around the internet instead the meanstream media. Internet is Journalisme 2.0. there is a lot of real good information on it, but its somtimes hard to find, cause we may not no it.

    Wake up, start thinking what YOUR yourny would be on this plannet, u only life once.

  • Yeah, I kinda wondered if Wikileaks was a misinformation op. For what purpose, I have no clue.

  • love websters voice

  • The point of the gist (wikileaks) is once again put just enough truth in 10% - 15% then add at least 70% propaganda for future goals and or necessary reasons for pre-emtive aggressive warfare. Likely against the one Muslim Country (Pakistan) that possesses nuclear arms and the other Muslim Country that may obtain them in the near future (Iran). At the same time they are releasing supposed intimate details of peace talks between Israeli and Palestinian diplomats claiming PA betrayal

  • @odduck Very good point. I don't believe anything anymore.

  • he is unusual for sure...

  • These things are always sad.

  • @cinxanyo

    Yep agree with you.

  • Comment removed

  • Nonsense ! 

  • Comment removed

  • @Amhiro

    Tarpley is right, thats irrefutable.

    J.Assange and wikileaks have left too anomalies, he thought he fooled the world, but the pieces didnt match the puzzle thats where he failed.

  • Comment removed

  • @Amhiro

    Believing WikiLeaks to be true, is like believing a Judge, who was paid of by the defendant.

    Believe what you want, all im saying is that the info does not add up.

  • Comment removed

  • @Amhiro

    WikiLeaks, the freedom fighting internet site, that fights against the US. govt, hosted by US servers that are in then hosted by the US govt, in the united states.

    What separates wikileaks being a government job, is nothing more than delusion.

  • @ThePunisherNWO you fucktard, wikileaks has servers all over the world, it is a private entity. You haven't even read the leaks you toolbag, or done any research on world politics.

  • Comment removed

  • @762Fanatic2

    And lastly, it doesn't have servers all over the world.

    Jeez your a fucking retard, learn what your talking about.

    Its HOSTED by multiple servers, thats true.

    But THOSE servers are OWNED BY THE US GOVERNMENT, like all the OTHER servers in existence.

    Please, GTFO and take your fail with you.

  • @ThePunisherNWO lol you're a retard.. all servers owned by the US? LMFAO!

  • @762Fanatic2

    You dont know a lot about the internet do you :/. ?

    Keep shootin' your little AK-47's, leave the internet to people who know how to think, because you clearly cannot.

  • @ThePunisherNWO That's so funny coming from an adolescent kid that still plays his little video games. You're talking out of your ass kid, you don't know anything.

  • @762Fanatic2

    Lol an adolescent kid that knows more than you.

    You shouldn't have dropped out of school.

  • @762Fanatic2

    "Arguing with a fool, only makes two"

    So you win,since i don't think of myself as fool, but i do of you :P.

    Have fun with your little guns.

  • @762Fanatic2

    Who do you "think" owns servers ? Do you even know what a server is ?

    I love people who dont know what they're talking about, and think they know it all.

    Take your fail and fail somewhere else.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonkaTrainHonkHonk

    So to elaborate.

    Wikileaks, most likely is the CIA, because IF, they were independent, and posting "top secret" govt info, it wouldn't last, and the site and people behind it would be ded,

    I'm not sure as to if you mistake the US government for being "incompetant" if thats the case, then your more mistaken than the australians were in. gallipoli

  • @ThePunisherNWO

    Sorry for spamming this video gentlemanjack, i dont think i could have got my message/info accross with a few sentences, i barely got it accross with this essay i wrote as is.

    Anyways great upload =] !

  • Webstar Tarpley is such a Zionist shill it hurts. He never once discusses Israel and Zionism as the cause, but blames it on "the CIA" all the time. I wish Alex 'Sholom" Jones and Webster "Zionist" Tarpley would get exposed for the disinfo spreading fraudsters they are. Google "Brother Nathaniel Foundation"

  • @32GaugeSlug I couldn't agree more with your point; however, that brother nathaniel has all the symptoms of an agent provocateur himself.

  • If you understood he attacks those who are un-just, like Clinton, Military Generals, and the hypocracy of a democracy, then you would know why the government (Cia) want to stick him in gitmo, like other wistle blowers. Assange is un-bias, and Leaders are murderers. Fuck you guy, stop takin shit outta proportion.

  • Ofcourse wikileaks is all just false hope.

    ulian Assange is no "hero".

    If the wikileaks was really a "threat" the government would have had all ISP providers ban access to the site.

  • @ThePunisherNWO The goverment cant tell an ISP to block something and it has not happened in the past.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonkatrainHONKHONK

    They can easily do it, all ISPs are government regulated.

    Why would the govt such as the US, the strongest in the world, let "important" top secret info out to the public?

    If its top secret, trust me. we WONT know about it.

    Wikileaks is NOT displaying top secret info or even info with any credibility, THATS why we know about it.

    If this information on wikileaks actually posed a threat, then something would have been done about it.

    Thinking anything else is just ignorance.

  • @ThePunisherNWO Because information that people have access to can be leaked. I am sure there is much higher level "top secret" information that would not be easily leaked. Also wikileaks is high key enough if they did do something it would cause public outrage. By ignoring it people stop thinking about it quickly and end up more interested in paris hiltons latest shenanigans.

    I also know some sites have been blocked i the past. But it was only with a select few ISP's.

  • @TonkatrainHONKHONK

    That makes no sense, top secret info isnt like leaking a video game or music, its serious, if anyone leaked top secret info they'd be dead before it even happened.

    I've done a course with Cisco Systems for the CCSP qualification, which too put it in short is network security, if the government wants a site terminated or blocked then it would be, if wikileaks actually had info that could do damage they wouldnt exist

  • @ThePunisherNWO

    in a perfect world your description, is how the internet would work....but we dont live there, so for us thats NOT how it works, are you catching on?

    I suggest you watch part 2 and 3 to this video, to get a key indication of who the people are behind wikileaks, theres a former GOOGLE top official on WL's board of directors.

  • @ThePunisherNWO

    Now, continuing what i was saying to the blissful simpleton below.

    ALL websites, and everything else on the internet, is hosted by a server.

    These servers, are in then hosted by too put it in, short the government.

    You are hosted by whats called an ISP, Comcast, AT&T etc, they too are practically

    owned by the government.

  • @ThePunisherNWO

    This is what info picked up at Cisco, and at my computer systems engineering courses.

    the wikileaks fiasco is a puzzle, im just putting the pieces together.

    NO government, especially NOT the United States government, who are the strongest, and most technologically advanced, let a threat survive.

    IF wikileaks, actually posed a threat, then the site would be shut down, they would cease to being, hosted, and the people behind wikileaks, will vanish without a trace.

  • @ThePunisherNWO wikileaks had been damaging. a good example is that leaked gunship video. Also as a result of just that one video there are way more common everyday people aware that they are not being told the whole story about iraq.

  • @TonkatrainHONKHONK

    That's collateral damage not "top secret info"... its foolish to expect a war to be fought "fairly" hence, its war.

    War by itself is a disregard for humanity, always existed and always will be.

    Well if it takes wikileaks to wake someone up to whats going on in the world, then those people aren't that bright to begin with and would be worthless in the bigger fight, its not that hard to notice the corruption, and the anomalies around us.

  • SOO TRUE.

  • @sgentlemanjack112

    You Finisht realfantasies, FATALITYY!!

  • tarpley has high intelligence, but he is a control freak. he has stated many times that he would rather see the world controlled by a few people than seeing it "floating" without leadership.

    he probably dislikes wikileaks because it has no real hierarchy, and because right now it is not predictable.

  • Everyone wants to be heard, but, not thought of as just following the herd. Mispellings detract.

    I see the uploader's point here. The supposed leaked info does fit well with the point he makes with this question. Is it just CIA playing us for fools? They have done it so well, so many times.

  • Who is the speaker in the video?

  • @cytuber Assange has probably not written the material but he definitely chose to emphasis on the specific bits of the same information he chose to disclose. Exactly 100% of what main stream media yells 24.7. Now that doesn't define truth for me at least Limited disclosure of information is conspiracy, in-proportionate emphasis on selected parts information is conspiracy- its manipulation. Just because someone has access to info doesn't mean he has the right to play with it-

  • oh? it's only the plodding details of massacre and genocide

    -excuse me? thats insignificant??

  • Both the US govt & Tarpley are trying to smear Assange

    So who's working for the govt?

    The US govt is preparing to charge Assange but not Tarpley

    So who's working for the govt?

    Assange has had his account & funding stopped by Tarpley hasn’t.

    So who's working for the government?

    The govt want to shut down Wikileaks and Tarpley says it can’t be trusted

    So who's working for the govt?

    I'm not a fanatic Assange supporter. I simply believe Assange is innocent until PROVEN guilty. Radical isn't it?

  • @cytuber I dont like Tarpley myself and believe he is subtle controlled opposition despite him telling the truth about this subject. I used to be on wikileaks side too until I saw the following two links. Google "Who is Behind Wikileaks? by Michel Chossudovsky" and "Who's Who at Wikileaks?" The first link says that Assange had mainstream media like der speigal and NYT select and edit the leaks. That right there should be all you need to know that this controlled opposition.

  • Why does Tarpley use programming techniques when describing Assange? Why use satanic words like cults, LSD, dark rooms, 'bloodless... emotionless... frozen'? What has Assanges relatives or appearance got to do with the material that has been leaked to his website?

    This is a classic smear job. Tarpley is using innuendo, suggestion and programming techniques to destroy Assange and Wikileaks. Why?

    FOCUS ON THE MESSAGE, NOT THE MESSENGER.

    IF YOU WANT THE 'TRUTH', FOCUS ON FACTS NOT OPINIONS.

  • Dead wrong. He's saying end all war, not oh, Afghan sucks and PAkistans the cause, let's get Pakistan. These people are retarded. I don't get why they think this.

  • @chiefkyle1 but the mass media keeps talking about it. That in and of itself should toss up red flags as to the true intent of what wikileaks is all about.

  • I'm holding final judgement on Assange & Wikileaks until They reveal what they have on the American Banks. Assange said Wikileaks are going to release in 2011!...If it exposes more banking corruption & also damages the greedy, immoral 'fat cats'....Then I'll believe Wikileaks is independent of any government control!

  • Wikileak = Propaganda. Solved. Thank you.

  • Is it just me or does Assange look like the late (BBC) actor John Inman AKA Wilberforce Humfrey; Of "Are You Being Served".

    This guy servse the Israli/ AIPAC agenda: war in Iran.

  • "This list of grievances is fashioned to invoke

    the five criteria given by John Locke to demonstrate that a

    gov is tyrannical and revolution is justified" - A

    History of Freedom taught by Rufus J, Fears, U of Ok

    1-It substitutes arbitrary will for law

    2-It hinders the legislative powers from assembling in good time or acting freely

    3-It alters the mode of electing the legislative body

    4-It delivers the people into the jurisdiction of a foreign power

    5-It abandons the trust to govern the people

  • This is my message for WIKI leaks !!!

    All the people from WIKI are HERO'S. Although I don't know the names from each single one of you I still take a deep bow for each single of you and each person who joins this peaceful revolution of a true free and democratic world. This is the best thing that happened to mankind and democracy in more then 2000 years.

    TO ALL THE PEOPLE !!!

    Join me and let the people from WIKI know that they are HERO'S, spread your tag all over the Internet !!! COPY THIS

  • @Jafhful Well SUCKER,ya better take 2 bites from that "Sucker Sandwich" u are bein PLAYED.this is even better than they obama Shill,i think i'm gonna television and Cryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy right along side oprah winfrey and jesse jackson,change u can believe in Suckerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr­rrrrrrrrrrrr.

  • @Jafhful Well Sucker u better 2 bites of that "Sucker Sandwich". assange is another long term cultivated and nurtured "SHILL" . it's all well placed dis-info,right out of the CIA and MI6 spook houses.assange is a shill,they been building,as long as they were building Obama,sucker ya got played again,change u can believe innnnnnnnn i think i'm gonna go on television,and cryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy,with oprah winfrey and jesse jackson,Suckerrrrrrrrrrr. COPY THIS U ARE A SUCKER.

  • “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck” - the common human

    youtube.com/watch?v=pMszztZ3qd­8

  • Im just as sceptical about assange as the next guy, but somebody needs to deliver something concrete on him, not these wild cia hunches that are based on some sort of "vibe" he gives off. Give me something I can work with, gut feelings dont cut it.

  • @realfantasies Oh because asking questions is less manly than making statements now?

    real fantasies indeed...

  • @TekkGnosisProduction

    You can't even read what I'm saying to you.. I got enough prove for myself to tell Assange is no good.. and neither is the people working for, with and under him. All you're saying is what I'm saying.. and I got more information from myself and my family about this then you might even get in your hands.. facts. Now you're advertising on defending him and now saying most of these guys are scams, get the f*ck out of here. Now you deleted it.. two side talking asshole..

  • Tarpley is fucking stupid, putting "top secret" on a doc. just attracts attention, this is well know. less important sounding classes have as much legal baring, but don't raise a red-flag to a persons eyes.

    and it's well know that the biggest conspiracies are BLACK OPS, there are no documents, no paper-trail. so if you're expecting them to find a document which nicely sums the conspiracy up for you, ur gonna searching eternity, buddy.the real conspiracy exists as between relations those involved

  • the intelligence agencies are known to have infiltrated the truth movement, and have many connected people as "guest authorities" on all types of shows. they're mis-leaders, to lead people into the mist.and can you not see, who you're benefiting supporting this stupidity?do your own research, instead of being the same sheep you claim not to be.

    Tarpley likes to ramble on a lot, blaming liberals and this group,or that country.He does nothing to help truthers except make them look like KKK member

  • @TekkGnosisProduction

    EVERYONE GO TO fsilaw.com AND LOOK AT THE DAMN NWO EYES EVERYWHERE!!! JULLIAN IS A SNAKE!

  • @TekkGnosisProduction

    Men you work directly for the family that thinks there gods.. fuck off..

  • Great work , this is the sort of real information people need , Keep up ther great work and expose the Wikjileaks for what it relly is, nothing more than American CIA, plot .

  • I love how they pay people off to attack grammmmmmarrrrrrrrr and otherwise bad mouth people over nothing. Don't feed in people. Thats what they want. Please ignore bs posts where they blast you for shit not related to the topic at hand.

  • How dare you criticize my hero! hehehe!...

  • The media is NOT trying to build up Julian Assange! They are trying to take him down! This video and narrator are nuts! Julian is NOT connected to the CIA!!!!

  • erm, have any of you actually read alot of these documents?

    I'd say the biggest threat to world piece is the USA government, and all you sad as fuck americans do is sit at your computers and do this?. If I was American I would be fucking rioting, and rioting hard

  • This talkie lacks any reason. If US would want to wage war against Iran, why go to the trouble of setting up a fake leak organisation. Think about the hundreds, thousands of intelligent people you would have to involve, secretly, to pull something like this off. Don't listen to this nonsense, do some reading in serious media.

  • These videos are full of ad hominem attacks on Assange. "strange, bloodless, emotionless, psychologly very unusual specimen, frozen" no its called being calm. You don't seem to understand this word. Look up the word "calm"

    Wikileaks simply report, and nothing more. Wikileakes don't need to give opinions, the facts they leak speak for themselves.

    Wikileaks is funded by the public, also has many volunteers.

    Wikileaks can't be shut down in "one hour" because it has over 2000 mirror sites.

  • @AsuraShin Assange only leaked low level classified docs.Not secret or top secret but BS gossip and minor info.That's a fact you ignore.Assange did nothing but say what people knew already and he gave it to selected media he made a deal with."You will be given your heroes" but they aren't actual heroes to people who pay attention....I looked at many channel who support assange.All were channels with a few videos and no reality, seemed real shady.If yours is any differnet it'll be the first.

  • @alexjonesexposed1 So the US want to arrest Assange on charges of espionage and threats to national security because of gossip news? Classified docs isn't enough for you? The people know nothing for sure, they suspect many things but now there's proof. Proof is what we need not speculation. The leaks needed to be released to the public domain somehow, so those three major newspapers were selected from Germany, UK and US.

  • @alexjonesexposed1 So what if the supporters of Assange had few videos or even none? What has that got to do with the content of comments and responses videos? You'd give more credibility to a comment if the user had lost of videos? That's ridiculous. Shady channels?? Your channel was set up a few weeks ago. You've 3 videos uploaded and 10 favorites so you fall under your own definition of shady channels. I set up my channel in 2006 and only began uploading videos last year. You're talking crap.